DOCSLIB.ORG

LAA Refresh 2009 Greater Peterborough Partnership Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LAA Refresh 2009 Greater Peterborough Partnership Final Peterborough City Council Town Hall Bridge Street Peterborough PE1 1QT 01733 747474 Mike Barnes Head of Sustainable Development Government Office for the East of England Eastbrook Shaftesbury Road Cambridge CB2 8DF March 2009 Dear Mike The Local Area Agreement for Peterborough 2008/ 2011 Refresh Please find attached Peterborough’s refreshed Local Area Agreement for submission to Ministers. As you know our ambition for the future of Peterborough is set out in the Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) 2008/21, which was itself refreshed last year as part of the development of the latest LAA. We remain committed to using the LAA process to drive improved and accelerated delivery of the key outcomes of the SCS and continue to invest in the development of our partnership structures, including a single performance management framework and Solution Centre. The Solution Centre has been a particularly innovative development that uses a 12-week intensive framework to tackle difficult cross-cutting issues through a partnership based approach. Initial programmes have addressed Teenage Pregnancy, Theft from Motor Vehicles and Childhood Obesity. In considering the basis for the refreshed targets it is worth considering the recent review of Peterborough’s Local Area Agreement which said: Peterborough has made good progress with developing and embedding a strong delivery focus as a partnership. It is well positioned for driving improvement through the LAA having invested in a genuine partnership approach to performance management for its LSP, the Greater Peterborough Partnership (GPP). This has real potential to achieve significant results and is helping mainstream the LAA and challenge existing delivery. Whilst we were pleased to see our progress recognised in this way, we are also aware that there is no room for complacency and that we still have a lot to do to meet targets in a number of areas. This was the focus of the recent GPP Executive development session on 12 February 2009, which sought to develop a stronger emphasis across all our partnerships on robust performance management that encourages greater innovation and better use of resource to effect real step change in delivery. A main focus of the refresh has been in developing the targets for those National Indicators that are based on the Place Survey. The absence of these targets has been a serious drawback in our ability to evaluate progress in these key areas of work, so the refresh should help us to refocus our efforts in these areas over the remaining two years of the Local Area Agreement. On reflection we have decided not to refresh the majority of the National Indicators that are most linked to the current economic downturn, namely NIs 151, 152, 153, 155, 166 and 171. Our view is that it would be impossible to predict meaningful targets for these indicators with any degree of accuracy at this point in the economic cycle. This does mean that these targets (as set in early 2008) will have a red status throughout the coming year. We assume that GO-East recognises this and we will be focusing our efforts on putting in place actions that mitigate the impact of the economic downturn and looking at innovative ways in which we can stimulate sustainable growth, which remains at the heart of our strategy for Peterborough. We will then take the opportunity in early 2009 to set meaningful targets for the final year of this Local Area Agreement. We have taken the opportunity to refresh NI154 (Net Additional Homes Provided) on the basis of evidence collected including a completions count, discussions with local developers and a review of initiatives in place to maintain and improve housing delivery. NI112 (Underage Conception Rate) was the focus of our pilot work for the Solution Centre and a significant amount of effort and resource has been focused on delivery in this area. A number of solutions are being taken forward and although it is anticipated that Peterborough will significantly improve its position, it is the view that the 2010/11 target of -55% remains unachievable and our expected improvement in Year 3 of the LAA will be nearer -43%. The partnership based approach to delivery in Peterborough continues to develop. Close working with partner authorities (both statutory & non-statutory) is a key focus of our ongoing LAA action planning and we held a specific Partner Delivery Summit in November 2008. Examples of statutory partner authorities have been included in the information relating to each National Indicator but it should be stressed that these are indicative – a comprehensive list of statutory & non-statutory partner authorities is available from individual Outcome Lead Officers. Our Outcome Lead Officers are continually developing links with the Voluntary & Community Sector (VCS) to ensure that maximum benefit is achieved for Peterborough’s people and communities. The refreshed targets have been developed with input from all relevant partners and have been presented and discussed at Peterborough City Council’s Scrutiny Committee on 09 March 2009. We can confirm that we have delegated authority to sign-off the details which the document contains, as agreed at Full Council on 09 April 2008. We are particularly pleased to have continued to develop a strong relationship with Peterborough’s Whitehall Champion, Peter Unwin , through the first year of this Local Area Agreement and his input into our Partner Delivery Summit event in November 2008 was evidence of the support that we have received. In addition, we have continued to develop excellent working relationships with colleagues from GO-East and this has been critical to the ongoing ‘good progress’ that is being experienced within Peterborough. Yours sincerely Councillor John Peach, Cons Ben Ticehurst Leader, Peterborough City Council Deputy Chief Executive, Peterborough City Council Local Area Agreement 2008 - 2011 (2009 Refresh) LAA Refresh Submission as at 26 March 2009 Greater Peterborough Partnership The table of indicators for the Peterborough Local Area Agreement, 2008-2011 is shown over. The table is in the required format for the submission of the LAA. Key: 1. indicators highlighted in red are those for which data has been updated as part of the LAA Refresh 2009 submission 2. indicators highlighted in green are those for which data has been updated since the previous LAA submission 3. indicators highlighted in orange are those for which data is still required and this will be included as part of a future submission Outcome National Indicator Baseline LAA Improvement Target Lead Partners, Statutory Designated indicators are Partner Authorities & marked with * 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Outcome Lead Officers (OLO) Creating Strong & Supportive Communities Greater Peterborough Partnership (GPP) 23 April 2009 Local Area Agreement 2008 - 2011 (2009 Refresh) SSC01: Making Peterborough Safer NI16 Serious acquisitive crime 30.454 29.235 28.016 26.797 Cambridgeshire – so that people of all ages and rate* Constabulary abilities can live, work and play in (rate per 1,000 (rate per 1,000 (rate per 1,000 (rate per 1,000 Peterborough City a prosperous and successful population) population) population) population) Council Peterborough without undue fear Cambridgeshire Fire & 2007/08 baseline of crime and supporting people to Rescue data based on resist engaging in crime and anti- Highways Agency March 2008 data social behaviour from iQuanta Peterborough Probation Board Rates are calculated using OLO: Steve Welby mid 2006 population figures (iQuanta) Outcome National Indicator Baseline LAA Improvement Target Lead Partners, Statutory Designated indicators are Partner Authorities & marked with * 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Outcome Lead Officers (OLO) NI17 Perceptions of anti-social Place Survey 20.05% N/A 17% Cambridgeshire behaviour* Constabulary Peterborough City Council Sport England Peterborough Probation Board OLO: Steve Welby Greater Peterborough Partnership (GPP) 23 April 2009 Local Area Agreement 2008 - 2011 (2009 Refresh) NI30 Re-offending rate of For 2008/09 (Oct 22% reduction in 20% reduction in The target will Cambridgeshire prolific and priority offenders* 06-Sept 07 = 384) offences from offences from be arrived at by Constabulary 384 baseline 316 baseline applying the Peterborough City For 2009/10 (Oct (no more than (no more than common ratio Council 07-Sept 08 =316) 300 offences) 252 offences) 1.17 to the performance OLO: Steve Welby For 2010/11 ceiling % target (baseline year to identified after be confirmed) the cohort has been refreshed. NI40 Drug users in effective 728 users 764 users 808 users 895 users Cambridgeshire treatment* (+5% against (+11% against (+23% against Constabulary 07/08 baseline) 07/08 baseline) 07/08 baseline) Peterborough City Council NHS Peterborough Peterborough & Stamford Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust OLO: Steve Welby NI 111 – First Time Entrants into Baseline (DCSF) 297 291 285 Cambridgeshire the Youth Justice System 303 (-2%) (-2%) (-2%) Constabulary aged 10-17 (PSA 14)* Peterborough City Council Peterborough Probation Board OLO: Steve Welby Outcome National Indicator Baseline LAA Improvement Target Lead Partners, Statutory Designated indicators are Partner Authorities & marked with * 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 Outcome Lead Officers (OLO) Greater Peterborough Partnership (GPP) 23 April 2009 Local Area Agreement 2008 - 2011 (2009 Refresh) NI32 Repeat incidents of 42% 28% TBD Cambridgeshire domestic violence* Constabulary Peterborough City Council NHS Peterborough Peterborough & Stamford Hospitals
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Short Guide: the NAO's Work on HM Treasury
    1 The NAO’s work on HM Treasury A ShoRT GUIDE The NAO’s work on HM Treasury June 2010 2 The NAO’s work on HM Treasury Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. We apply the unique perspective of public audit to help Parliament and government drive lasting improvement in public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending on behalf of Parliament. The Comptroller and Auditor General, Amyas Morse, is an Officer of the House of Commons. He is the head of the National Audit Office which employs some 900 staff. He and the National Audit Office are totally independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of all Government departments and a wide range of other public sector bodies; and he has statutory authority to report to Parliament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies have used their resources. Our work leads to savings and other efficiency gains worth many millions of pounds: £890 million in 2009-10. Contents Introduction 5 About the Department 6 The Department’s responsibilities 6 Where the Department spends its money 7 Financial management 10 Financial governance and reporting 10 Financial management across government 10 Efficiency 11 Use of information 12 Testing the reliability of performance data across government 12 Use of information by HM Treasury 13 Our audit of the budget assumptions 13 Service delivery 14 Financial stability measures 14 Procurement across government 15 Appendices 18 5 The NAO’s work on HM Treasury This short guide is one of 17 we have produced covering our work on each major government department.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GREEN BOOK Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government
    THE GREEN BOOK Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government Treasury Guidance LONDON:TSO CONTENTS Page Page Contents iv Annex 1 Government intervention 51 Introduction 51 Preface v Economic efficiency 51 Chapter 1 Introduction and background 1 Equity 52 Introduction 1 Additionality 52 When to use the Green Book 2 Regeneration 54 Chapter 2 Overview of appraisal and Annex 2 Valuing non-market impacts 57 evaluation 3 Introduction 57 Introduction 3 Valuing non-market impacts 57 The appraisal and evaluation cycle 3 Current research/plausible estimates 59 The role of appraisal 3 Valuing environmental impacts 63 Process for appraisal and evaluation 4 Annex 3 Land and buildings 69 Presenting the results 6 Introduction 69 Managing appraisals and evaluations 7 Acquisition and use of property 69 Frameworks 8 Leases and rents 71 Issues relevant to appraisal and evaluation 9 Disposal of property 72 Chapter 3 Justifying action 11 Cost effective land use 72 Introduction 11 Annex 4 Risk and uncertainty 79 Reasons for government intervention 11 Introduction 79 Carrying out research 11 Risk management 79 Chapter 4 Setting objectives 13 Transferring risk 82 Introduction 13 Optimism bias 85 Objectives, outcomes, outputs and targets 13 Monte Carlo analysis 87 Irreversible risk 88 Chapter 5 Appraising the options 17 The cost of variability in outcomes 88 Introduction 17 Creating options 17 Annex 5 Distributional impacts 91 Valuing the costs and benefits of options 19 Introduction 91 Adjustments to values of costs and benefits 24 Distributional analysis 91
    [Show full text]
  • US/UK Government and Politics
    GNICSDAITINLPORSTEDNU Understanding US/UK government and politics DUNCAN WATTS UNDERSTANDING US/UK GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS UNDERSTANDING POLITICS Series editor DUNCAN WATTS Following the review of the national curriculum for 16–19 year olds, UK examining boards introduced new specifications, first used in 2001 and 2002. A-level courses are now divided into A/S level for the first year of sixth-form studies, and the more difficult A2 level thereafter. The Understanding Politics series comprehensively covers the politics syllabuses of all the major examination boards, featuring a dedicated A/S-level textbook and four books aimed at A2 students. The books are written in an accessible, user-friendly and jargon-free manner and will be essential to students sitting these examinations. Already published Understanding political ideas and movements Kevin Harrison and Tony Boyd Understanding British and European political issues Neil McNaughton Understanding American government and politics Duncan Watts Understanding A/S level government and politics Chris Wilson Understanding US/UK government and politics A comparative guide DUNCAN WATTS Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Duncan Watts 2003 The right of Duncan Watts to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010,
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Analysis Assurance Review of Her Majesty's Treasury
    Science & Analysis Assurance Review of Her Majesty’s Treasury Government Office for Science Science Review of HMT Contents Foreword .............................................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... ii 1. Science and Analysis Review of The Treasury...................................................................... 1 2. Macroeconomic Analysis......................................................................................................... 4 3. Distributional Analysis ........................................................................................................... 10 4. Public Spending Control ........................................................................................................ 14 5. Staff Turnover and Institutional Memory.............................................................................. 20 6. Transparency, Engagement and Capability Management .................................................. 26 Annex A: List of interviews conducted .......................................................................................... 30 Annex B: Bibliography..................................................................................................................... 32 Annex C: Methodology ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Government's Response to the Science and Technology Committee Report – CP
    The Government’s Response to the Science and Technology Committee report: The UK Response to Covid-19: Use of Scientific Advice Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care by Command of Her Majesty May 2021 CP 432 The Government’s Response to the Science and Technology Committee report: The UK Response to Covid-19: Use of Scientific Advice Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care by Command of Her Majesty May 2021 CP 432 © Crown copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at COVID- [email protected]. ISBN 978-1-5286-2505-0 CCS CCS0321245842 05/21 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office The Government’s Response to the Science and Technology Committee report: The UK Response to Covid-19: Use of Scientific Advice Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary of Committee Recommendations ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Home Office Guide to Living in Asylum Accommodation – English
    A Home Office Guide to Living in Asylum Accommodation English Purpose of this guide This guide is for asylum seekers staying in temporary accommodation while their claim for asylum is assessed. It contains important information about: • the housing and services you can expect to receive from us • the organisations that provide and deliver these services • what we expect from you • where to report problems, concerns and change in circumstances How should I use this booklet? Please read this booklet carefully. Highlight any information important to you and your family. There is a lot of information in this booklet so please keep it in a safe place, so you can refer to it later. What can I expect as part of induction? You will be given keys to the property, and a detailed induction from your accommodation provider. You will get information about appliances and utilities in a language you understand. You will also get: • information about your accommodation provider and what to expect from them • information about Migrant Help and what to expect from them • information about local services that you can use, for example health, education, local authority (local government) and support services • the ‘Home Office Guide to Rights and Expectations in the UK’ booklet, which includes information on UK culture and services available to you while in the UK If you have not got any of these services or resources, please ask your housing officer for them. Keep booklets in a safe place to read again later. You can access the information in this booklet online as well on: www.gov.uk/government/publications/ living-in-asylum-accommodation 2 Immediately tell your housing officer if you believe that the accommodation isn’t suitable for a specific need you have, for example, a need due to a disability.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Identifiers in Understanding Society Version 1 Birgitta Rabe Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex
    Understanding Society Working Paper Series No. 2011 – 01 March 2011 Updated November 2011 Geographical identifiers in Understanding Society Version 1 Birgitta Rabe Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex Geographical identifiers in Understanding Society Version 1 Birgitta Rabe Non-Technical Summary Understanding Society opens a range of new opportunities for local area research. These arise because geographical identifiers are being made available at different geographical levels which enable researchers to merge a wealth of data on area characteristics to individual’s responses. Many of these are freely available for download from the internet. This paper provides a brief introduction to UK geography, gives an overview of the geo-codes available for use with Understanding Society and provides documentation of the available variables. Geographical identifiers in Understanding Society Version 1 Birgitta Rabe Abstract A range of geographical identifiers are being made available for Understanding Society which allow researchers to merge external data at different geographical levels to individual’s responses. Examples of geographical identifiers at higher level include country and Government Office Region; at medium level Local Authority Districts and Travel to Work Areas; at lower level Lower Layer Super Output Areas. This paper provides a brief introduction to UK geography, gives an overview of the geo-codes available for use with Understanding Society and provides documentation of the variables. Keywords: Geographical identifiers; Data linkage; Understanding Society JEL Classifications: C81, Y20 Contact: [email protected] Acknowledgements: The work reported in this paper is part of the Understanding Society programme, funded by the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Selection and Portfolio Allocation in the Cameron Government
    This is a repository copy of Ministerial selection and portfolio allocation in the Cameron Government. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/82698/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Ministerial Selection and Portfolio Allocation in the Cameron Government Dr Timothy Heppell Associate Professor of British Politics School of Politics and International Studies Introduction: The power to appoint and dismiss is one of the most important powers at the disposal of the UK Prime Minister (Allen and Ward, 2009, p. 238). It is through their powers of patronage that they shape, and reshape through reshuffles, their government. It is this power that gives them political leverage and ensures their dominance over their ministerial and party colleagues. All Prime Ministers ‘wield this instrument with strategic effect’ (Berlinski et al, 2012, p. 2). The rise of the career politician would appear to intensify the significance of this power (King, 1981, pp. 249-85) as ministerial office represents the ‘height of ambition’ for most contemporary parliamentarians (Berlinski et al, 2007, p. 245). Most of them ‘passionately want to be ministers’ and ‘if they are already ministers, they want to be promoted in the ministerial hierarchy’, and above all else ‘they certainly do not want to be demoted or dismisse identifying ministerial suitability does remove a significant proportion of the parliamentary party from consideration. An additional question to ask would be whether certain parliamentarians are unsuited to ministerial office for reasons other than competence. Some will have to be discounted due to the fact that their personal behaviour or political attitudes could make them a liability if a minister.
    [Show full text]
  • MERSEYSIDE Single Programming Documen 1994-99 Objective 1 : Structural Development and Adjustment of Regions Whose Development Is Lagging Behind
    EC Structural Funds MERSEYSIDE Single programming documen 1994-99 Objective 1 : Structural development and adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind European Commission The Objectives of the Structural Funds Objective 1 (1994-1999) Objective 2 (1994-1996) Objective 5b (1994-199) New members (1.1.95) Economic adjustment of regions Economic conversion of declining Economic diversification of rural Information on the eligible areas in whose development is lagging behind. industrial areas. areas. Austria, Finland and Sweden will be available shortly. v^z?¿> The lists of areas eligible under the Structural Funds are published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This map gives only general guidance. EC Structural Funds MERSEYSIDE Single programming document 1994-99 Objective 1 : Structural development and adjustment of regions whose development is lagging behind European Commission Series of 'Community support frameworks 1994­99 — Objective 1' Neue Lander—Gemeinschaftliches Förderkonzept Catalogue No: CX­85­94­276­DE­C Italia—Quadro comunitario di sostegno Catalogue No: CX­85­94­284­IT­C Ireland—Community support framework Catalogue No: CX­85­94­107­EN­C Portugal—Community support framework Catalogue No: CX­82­94­771 ­EN­C Portugal—Quadre communautaire d'appui Catalogue No: CX­82­94­771­FR­C Portugal—Quadro comunitário de apoio Catalogue No: CX­82­94­771­PT­C España—Marco Comunitario de Apoyo Catalogue No: CX­85­94­292­ES­C Ελλάδα—Κοινοτικό πλαίσιο στήριξης Catalogue No: CX-85-94-462-GR-C Greece—Community support framework Catalogue No: CX-85-94-462-EN-C Series of 'Single programming documents 1994-99 — Objective 1' France Martinique, Guyane, Guadeloupe, Réunion— Documents uniques de programmation.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    UK Housing Review 2004/2005 9 Introduction Introduction The six chapters of Section 2: Commentary are primarily as a result of changes in definitions. A The primary objective of this, the 13th edition of the available on this website and offer a brief cross check of the data for those years still published UK Housing Review (initially called the Housing introduction to and discussion of the key in the current edition of the Review will generally Finance Review), remains simply to draw together developments in policy, financial provision and indicate whether or not this is an issue. key current financial and related data about both output, that are reflected in the tables and figures in public and private housing in the United Kingdom, the main Compendium of tables. It also provides a Regions and rapidly assemble them in a coherent and reference to other publications and data that offer The Review contains several tables providing data for accessible format. further useful insights into current policy issues. the regions of England. Many of those tables provide data for the long established standard statistical To that end the Review draws on a wide range of A longer perspective regions. Government statistics are, however, now Expenditure Plans and Departmental Reports, as well Many of the tables in the Review provide data over a being published primarily on the basis of as statistical volumes, survey reports, and other more long time period. Wherever possible those tables government office regions. This presents difficulties occasional research reports. The Review also includes start in 1970, providing data at five year intervals for in providing a consistent long run of regional data.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Mobility: Governance of UK Transport Infrastructures
    Governance of UK Transport Infrastructures Future of Mobility: Evidence Review Foresight, Government Office for Science Governance of UK Transport Infrastructures Governance of UK Transport Infrastructures Professor Greg Marsden, Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds Professor Iain Docherty, Adam Smith Business School, University of Glasgow January 2019. This review has been commissioned as part of the UK government’s Foresight Future of Mobility project. The views expressed are those of the author and do not represent those of any government or organisation. This document is not a statement of government policy. Acknowledgements This report has been made possible through the contributions of a number of subject experts. In particular Dr Lucy Budd (Loughborough University) on Aviation, Professor Peter White (University of Westminster) on Buses, Professor Alf Baird (Independent) on Maritime, Nigel Foster and Emma Roberts (Fore Consulting) on regional decision- making and various colleagues from the Institute for Transport Studies at the University of Leeds (Professor Chris Nash (Rail), Dr Phillip Wheat (Road), Dr Tony Whiteing (Freight), Professor Oliver Carsten (Automation) and Dr John Nellthorp (Future Funding)). The contributions of each of these experts from which this report draws are included in the Technical Annex. We are also grateful to Gerard Whelan at KPMG for hosting a workshop on future funding and for the more than 35 professionals who took part in our two workshops. This report has an information cut off date of May 2018. 2 Governance of UK Transport Infrastructures Executive Summary Transport plays a vital role in every day life. The efficient movement of people and goods is an essential part of a productive economy as well as being important for social cohesion, health and well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • New Statistical Regions Research Paper 97/67
    The New Statistical Regions Research Paper 97/67 22 May 1997 In April 1997 the Government Statistical Service adopted the Government Office Regions (GORs) for the standard presentation of regional data for England. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland continue to be standard areas for statistical output. This paper describes the new areas and provides some statistical comparisons between them. Robert Twigger Bryn Morgan Economic Policy & Statistics Social & General Statistics Section Section House of Commons Library Library Research Papers are compiled for the benefit of Members of Parliament and their personal staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. CONTENTS Page I Introduction 5 II The new regions 6 III Some basic statistics 11 A Population and vital statistics 11 B Labour market 13 C Unemployed claimants 15 D Regional accounts 15 Appendix 1: SSRs and GORs in terms of pre-1997 counties 18 Research Paper 97/67 I Introduction In 1994 ten Government Offices for the Regions were established to integrate the regional operations of four departments: Environment, Trade and Industry, Employment (now Education and Employment) and Transport. From April 1997 the Government Statistical Service has adopted these Government Office Regions (GORs) for the standard presentation of regional statistics for England. Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland continue to be standard areas for statistical output. The GORs replace the standard statistical regions (SSRs) which have been in use since local government reorganisation in the 1970s and, with small changes, since the 1960s. This change was prompted by a number of factors: • some change was necessary due to the re-organisation of local government in England, Wales and Scotland; • the standard statistical regions are of very different sizes.
    [Show full text]