Freedom House Monthly Newsletter

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freedom House Monthly Newsletter FREEDOM IN THE WORLD 2021 United Kingdom 93 FREE /100 Political Rights 39 /40 Civil Liberties 54 /60 LAST YEAR'S SCORE & STATUS 94 /100 Free Global freedom statuses are calculated on a weighted scale. See the methodology. Overview The United Kingdom (UK)—which includes the constituent countries of England, Scotland, and Wales along with the territory of Northern Ireland—is a stable democracy that regularly holds free elections and is home to a vibrant media sector. While the government enforces robust protections for political rights and civil liberties, recent years have seen concerns about increased government surveillance of residents, as well as rising Islamophobia and anti-immigrant sentiment. In a 2016 referendum, UK voters narrowly voted to leave the European Union (EU), through a process known colloquially as “Brexit,” which will have political and economic reverberations both domestically and across Europe in the coming years. Key Developments in 2020 • In January, the regional government of Northern Ireland resumed after a hiatus of nearly three years, in a wide-ranging deal backed by the UK and Irish governments. • In December, the UK and the EU finalized an agreement to govern their future relationship and finalize the UK’s departure from the bloc. Under its terms, UK travelers to EU member states will need visas in more circumstances, while EU citizens in the UK are required to seek settled status with the authorities. • The government instituted a nationwide COVID-19-related lockdown in March before loosening some restrictions in May, though another lockdown was reimposed in England in late October and stricter restrictions were instituted throughout Great Britain in December. Police forces were criticized for using new and existing powers to disproportionately target racial and ethnic minorities throughout the crisis. The World Health Organization recorded 2.4 million cases and nearly 72,600 deaths at year’s end. Political Rights A. Electoral Process A1 0-4 pts Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 Executive power rests with the prime minister and cabinet, which must have the support of the House of Commons. The leader of the majority party or coalition usually becomes prime minister, and appoints the cabinet. A snap general election was held in December 2019, where a majority Conservative government, led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson, was elected. A2 0-4 pts Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 The UK has a bicameral Parliament. The more powerful lower chamber, the House of Commons, has 650 members directly elected to serve five-year terms. Members of the unelected House of Lords are appointed by the monarch. There were 793 members in December 2020. The body largely plays an oversight role in reviewing legislation passed by the House of Commons. A general election was not due until 2022, but Prime Minister Johnson, who led a minority government after winning the premiership in July 2019, secured a new election from Parliament. The Conservatives, who focused their campaign on their intention to stop further delays to the Brexit process, won 365 seats in the December election, up from 318 in the last Parliament, and secured an 81-seat majority. The opposition Labour Party won 203 seats, down from 262 in the last Parliament. The Scottish National Party, which campaigned to remain in the EU and advocates for Scottish independence from the UK, remained the third-largest party in the House of Commons, gaining 13 seats over its 2017 result and winning 48 of Scotland’s 59 parliamentary seats. The Liberal Democrats, the fourth-largest party, won 11 seats nationwide. Elections for some local councils, police commissioners, and mayoralties in parts of England and Wales were scheduled for May 2020, but were delayed to May 2021 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. A3 0-4 pts Are the electoral laws and framework fair, and are they implemented impartially by the relevant election management bodies? 4 / 4 The UK’s electoral framework is robust and well implemented, though a limited Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe mission that observed the 2017 election urged lawmakers to boost transparency surrounding campaign financing. Despite this recommendation, no individual donation caps currently exist. In September 2020, the Electoral Reform Society (ERS), a nongovernmental organization (NGO), called for the regulation of internet-based campaign and financing activities. Parliament maintains a direct role in electoral management, notably through its involvement in the seat boundary drawing process. The Parliamentary Constituencies Act 2020, which was enacted in December, will limit its future involvement. The Fixed- term Parliaments Act 2011, meanwhile, limits a prime minister’s ability to force a snap election, but the government introduced a bill to repeal it in December 2020. Conservative governments have moved towards requiring voters to produce identification in order to vote. In August 2019, the ERS noted that 2,000 prospective voters living in English authorities participating in a pilot voter identification scheme were turned away from polling stations in that May’s local elections, and that a permanent requirement would disproportionately impact Black, Asian, and minority ethnic (BAME) voters. The UK’s electoral infrastructure has contended with Russian interference dating back to the 2016 referendum on EU membership. In July 2020, a parliamentary intelligence committee criticized the government’s inability to investigate potential Russian interference in the referendum. B. Political Pluralism and Participation B1 0-4 pts Do the people have the right to organize in different political parties or other competitive political groupings of their choice, and is the system free of undue obstacles to the rise and fall of these competing parties or 4 / 4 groupings? Parties do not face undue restrictions on registration or operation. The Conservative and Labour parties have dominated politics for decades, though other parties regularly win seats. B2 0-4 pts Is there a realistic opportunity for the opposition to increase its support or gain power through elections? 4 / 4 Opposition parties operate freely, and have a realistic opportunity to increase their support and gain power through elections. B3 0-4 pts Are the people’s political choices free from domination by forces that are external to the political sphere, or by political forces that employ 4 / 4 extrapolitical means? People’s political choices are generally free from domination by groups using extrapolitical means. B4 0-4 pts Do various segments of the population (including ethnic, racial, religious, gender, LGBT+, and other relevant groups) have full political rights and 4 / 4 electoral opportunities? Under the UK’s system of devolution, Parliament has granted different degrees of legislative power to the Northern Ireland Assembly, the Welsh Assembly, and the Scottish Parliament, augmenting the political representation of regional populations. Women, LGBT+ people, and members of racial and ethnic minority groups are active in UK politics. After the December 2019 general election, a record 220 members of Parliament (MPs), representing 34 percent of the lower house, are female. LGBT+ and BAME representation also improved. C. Functioning of Government C1 0-4 pts Do the freely elected head of government and national legislative representatives determine the policies of the government? 4 / 4 Freely elected officials can generally make and implement national policy without significant influence from actors who are not democratically accountable. Parliament approved the Coronavirus Act 2020, which includes a two-year sunset clause and is subject to parliamentary review, to initiate a COVID-19 lockdown in March 2020. Elections to the Northern Ireland Assembly took place in March 2017, but legislators did not form a functioning government for a record-breaking 1,045 days after that poll. An agreement, which was facilitated by the UK and Ireland, was finalized in January 2020. Score Change: The score improved from 3 to 4 because Northern Irish legislators agreed on the formation of a regional government in January after a deadlock lasting nearly three years. C2 0-4 pts Are safeguards against official corruption strong and effective? 3 / 4 Large-scale official corruption is not historically pervasive, and anticorruption bodies are generally effective. However, the UK government issued numerous COVID-19- related tenders to politically connected recipients or to firms without relevant experience according to a December 2020 New York Times report examining $22 billion worth of contracts. A National Audit Office report issued in November highlighted conflict-of-interest and bias concerns in the tender process. Politically connected firms also received tenders for other purposes; in March 2020, a firm connected to Conservative minister Michael Gove and then staffer Dominic Cummings received £840,000 ($1.04 million) to conduct Brexit-related focus group research without a public bidding process. The UK faces scrutiny for the ways in which its banking and financial sectors, property market, and offshore services in overseas territories enable money laundering and facilitate corruption globally. Score Change: The score declined from 4 to 3 due to reports of firms and individuals connected to the governing Conservative Party receiving
Recommended publications
  • A Short Guide: the NAO's Work on HM Treasury
    1 The NAO’s work on HM Treasury A ShoRT GUIDE The NAO’s work on HM Treasury June 2010 2 The NAO’s work on HM Treasury Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. We apply the unique perspective of public audit to help Parliament and government drive lasting improvement in public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending on behalf of Parliament. The Comptroller and Auditor General, Amyas Morse, is an Officer of the House of Commons. He is the head of the National Audit Office which employs some 900 staff. He and the National Audit Office are totally independent of Government. He certifies the accounts of all Government departments and a wide range of other public sector bodies; and he has statutory authority to report to Parliament on the economy, efficiency and effectiveness with which departments and other bodies have used their resources. Our work leads to savings and other efficiency gains worth many millions of pounds: £890 million in 2009-10. Contents Introduction 5 About the Department 6 The Department’s responsibilities 6 Where the Department spends its money 7 Financial management 10 Financial governance and reporting 10 Financial management across government 10 Efficiency 11 Use of information 12 Testing the reliability of performance data across government 12 Use of information by HM Treasury 13 Our audit of the budget assumptions 13 Service delivery 14 Financial stability measures 14 Procurement across government 15 Appendices 18 5 The NAO’s work on HM Treasury This short guide is one of 17 we have produced covering our work on each major government department.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime on Public Transport March 2016
    Police and Crime Committee Crime on public transport March 2016 ©Greater London Authority March 2016 Police and Crime Committee Members Joanne McCartney (Chair) Labour Jenny Jones (Deputy Chair) Green Caroline Pidgeon MBE (Deputy Chair) Liberal Democrat Tony Arbour Conservative Jennette Arnold OBE Labour Kemi Badenoch Conservative Andrew Dismore Labour Len Duvall Labour Roger Evans Conservative Role of the Police and Crime Committee The Police and Crime Committee examines the work of the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (MOPAC) and reviews the Police and Crime Plan for London. The Committee can also investigate anything that it considers to be of importance to policing and crime reduction in Greater London and make recommendations for improvements. Contact Janette Roker, Scrutiny Manager Email: [email protected] Contact: 020 7983 6562 For media enquiries: Mary Dolan, External Relations Email: [email protected] Contact: 020 7983 4603 2 Contents Chair’s foreword ................................................................................................. 4 Executive summary ............................................................................................. 5 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 8 2. Types of crime committed on public transport .......................................... 9 3. Tackling crime and anti-social behaviour on public transport ................. 13 4. Policing the 24 hour city ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE GREEN BOOK Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government
    THE GREEN BOOK Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government Treasury Guidance LONDON:TSO CONTENTS Page Page Contents iv Annex 1 Government intervention 51 Introduction 51 Preface v Economic efficiency 51 Chapter 1 Introduction and background 1 Equity 52 Introduction 1 Additionality 52 When to use the Green Book 2 Regeneration 54 Chapter 2 Overview of appraisal and Annex 2 Valuing non-market impacts 57 evaluation 3 Introduction 57 Introduction 3 Valuing non-market impacts 57 The appraisal and evaluation cycle 3 Current research/plausible estimates 59 The role of appraisal 3 Valuing environmental impacts 63 Process for appraisal and evaluation 4 Annex 3 Land and buildings 69 Presenting the results 6 Introduction 69 Managing appraisals and evaluations 7 Acquisition and use of property 69 Frameworks 8 Leases and rents 71 Issues relevant to appraisal and evaluation 9 Disposal of property 72 Chapter 3 Justifying action 11 Cost effective land use 72 Introduction 11 Annex 4 Risk and uncertainty 79 Reasons for government intervention 11 Introduction 79 Carrying out research 11 Risk management 79 Chapter 4 Setting objectives 13 Transferring risk 82 Introduction 13 Optimism bias 85 Objectives, outcomes, outputs and targets 13 Monte Carlo analysis 87 Irreversible risk 88 Chapter 5 Appraising the options 17 The cost of variability in outcomes 88 Introduction 17 Creating options 17 Annex 5 Distributional impacts 91 Valuing the costs and benefits of options 19 Introduction 91 Adjustments to values of costs and benefits 24 Distributional analysis 91
    [Show full text]
  • Policing the Bridges Appendix 1.Pdf
    Appendix One NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED Policing the Bridges and allocation of costs to the Bridge House Estates OPINION Introduction 1. This Opinion considers the nature and extent of the City's obligations as to the policing of the City's bridges and the extent to which those costs may be attributed to the Bridge House Estates. It focuses on general policing responsibilities rather than any specific project, although the issue has recently received renewed attention as the result of a project to install river cameras at the bridges. Issues concerning the quantum of any contribution and a Trustee‟s general duty to act in the best interests of Trust are not dealt with in this Opinion. 2. In order to provide context and to inform interpretation, some historical constitutional background is included. This has however been confined to material which assists in deciding the extent of the obligations and sources of funding rather than providing a broader narrative. After a short account of the history of the „Watch‟, each bridge is considered in turn, concluding, in each case, with an assessment of the position under current legislation. Establishment of Watches and the Bridges 3. In what appears to be a remarkably coordinated national move, the Statute of Winchester 1285 (13 Edw. I), commanded that watch be kept in all cities and towns and that two Constables be chosen in every "Hundred" or "Franchise"; specific to the City, the Statuta Civitatis London, also passed in 1285, regularised watch arrangements so that the gates of London would be shut every night and that the City‟s twenty-four Wards, would each have six watchmen controlled by an Alderman.
    [Show full text]
  • An Affront to Dignity, Inclusion and Equality: Coronavirus and the Impact of Law, Policy and Practice on People with Disabilities in the United Kingdom
    Report Recommendations - An Affront to Dignity, Inclusion and Equality: Coronavirus and the impact of law, policy and practice on people with disabilities in the United Kingdom In the following areas our Report urges the government to: On reforming the Coronavirus Act 2020, disability rights and mitigating effects of the pandemic 1. Undertake an immediate review of legislation passed during the coronavirus crisis and communication thereof. In doing so, we ask that the government change this legislation and all related policymaking to meet its duties under the Equality Act 2010, and commitments to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and take steps to avoid or mitigate any potential disadvantage for disabled people. 2. Implement recommendations made by the 2016 House of Lords Select Committee Report on the Equality Act 2010 and Disability, and by the Women and Equalities Committee, on enhancing the enforcement of the Equality Act 2010, both by removing deterrents to individuals bringing disability discrimination cases; and by measures which embed the monitoring and enforcement of relevant duties in the work of regulatory and inspection bodies. 3. Undertake an inquiry on the impact of COVID-19 on disabled people to examine why this group has carried such a heavy burden for the pandemic, including the scale of Covid-19 related deaths. 4. Establish a Covid-19 Disability Inclusive Response and Recovery Group, of experts by experience with disabilities and Disabled People’s Organisations, to ensure disabled people are central to decision-making on the economic and social recovery to the pandemic and guidance. 5.
    [Show full text]
  • City of London Police National Fraud Intelligence Bureau
    1 CITY OF LONDON POLICE: OFFICIAL - RECIPIENT ONLY City of London Police National Fraud Intelligence Bureau Coronavirus fraud core script – updated 28 May 2020 (Update 5) This script has been approved by the National Economic Crime Centre, Home Office and National Cyber Security Centre. Page 2 – Key messages and protection advice Page 4 – Agreed lines on specific issues Page 10 – Latest update from NFIB CITY OF LONDON POLICE: OFFICIAL - RECIPIENT ONLY 2 CITY OF LONDON POLICE: OFFICIAL - RECIPIENT ONLY Key messages 1) Criminals will use every opportunity they can to defraud innocent people. They will continue to exploit every angle of this national crisis and we want people to be prepared. 2) We are not trying to scare people at a time when they are already anxious. We simply want people to be aware of the very simple steps they can take to protect themselves from handing over their money, or personal details, to criminals. 3) Law enforcement, government and industry are working together to protect people, raise awareness, take down fraudulent websites and email addresses, and ultimately bring those responsible to justice. 4) If you think you’ve fallen for a scam, contact your bank immediately and report it to Action Fraud on 0300 123 2040 or via actionfraud.police.uk. If you are in Scotland, please report to Police Scotland directly by calling 101. 5) You can report suspicious texts by forwarding the original message to 7726, which spells SPAM on your keypad. You can report suspicious emails by forwarding the original message to [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 and the Use and Scrutiny of Emergency Powers
    HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on the Constitution 3rd Report of Session 2021–22 COVID-19 and the use and scrutiny of emergency powers Ordered to be printed 2 June 2021 and published 10 June 2021 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 15 Select Committee on the Constitution The Constitution Committee is appointed by the House of Lords in each session “to examine the constitutional implications of public bills coming before the House; and to keep under review the operation of the constitution and constitutional aspects of devolution.” Membership The Members of the Constitution Committee are: Baroness Corston Baroness Fookes Lord Sherbourne of Didsbury Baroness Doocey Lord Hennessy of Nympsfield Baroness Suttie Baroness Drake Lord Hope of Craighead Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Chair) Lord Dunlop Lord Howarth of Newport Lord Faulks Lord Howell of Guildford Declarations of interests A full list of Members’ interests can be found in the Register of Lords’ Interests: https://members.parliament.uk/members/lords/interests/register-of-lords-interests/ Publications All publications of the committee are available at: https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/172/constitution-committee/ Parliament Live Live coverage of debates and public sessions of the committee’s meetings are available at: http://www.parliamentlive.tv Further information Further information about the House of Lords and its committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords Committee staff The current staff of the committee are Michael Torrance (Clerk), Ava Mayer (Policy Analyst) and Dan Weedon (Committee Assistant).
    [Show full text]
  • City of London Policing Plan
    City of London Police Policing Plan 2020-23 2020 - CITY OF LONDON POLICING 2023 PLAN Supporting the Police Code of Ethics by policing with professionalism, fairness and integrity City of London Police Policing Plan 2020-23 Foreword from the Commissioner and Chairman of the Police Authority Board I am pleased to present to you our plan for policing the City of London Together, the Police Authority and the City of London Police have over the next 3 years. developed priorities that reflect the policing and crime issues that you told us are important to you, that respond to the current threats and also Policing has faced many difficult challenges over recent years, which has deliver on our commitment as national lead force to tackle economic included delivering services with fewer officers and significant constraints crime and fraud. on budgets. I am pleased to report that this Plan presents for the first time since 2011 a significant increase in the number of officers for the City of Whilst, the City of London remains one of the safest places to live, the London, which will enhance our ability to meet those challenges head on. challenges of persistent crime along with new and emerging crime threats Today, there is no greater challenge than the threat we face from are always present and the Police Authority is determined to ensure that terrorism and increasing levels of violent crime. My primary aim is to we have a service that continues to make the City safe and secure. The protect the people and infrastructure of the City of London, ensuring the recent increase in funding for police officers is a major boost in enabling Square Mile remains a safe and vibrant place to live, work and visit.
    [Show full text]
  • US/UK Government and Politics
    GNICSDAITINLPORSTEDNU Understanding US/UK government and politics DUNCAN WATTS UNDERSTANDING US/UK GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS UNDERSTANDING POLITICS Series editor DUNCAN WATTS Following the review of the national curriculum for 16–19 year olds, UK examining boards introduced new specifications, first used in 2001 and 2002. A-level courses are now divided into A/S level for the first year of sixth-form studies, and the more difficult A2 level thereafter. The Understanding Politics series comprehensively covers the politics syllabuses of all the major examination boards, featuring a dedicated A/S-level textbook and four books aimed at A2 students. The books are written in an accessible, user-friendly and jargon-free manner and will be essential to students sitting these examinations. Already published Understanding political ideas and movements Kevin Harrison and Tony Boyd Understanding British and European political issues Neil McNaughton Understanding American government and politics Duncan Watts Understanding A/S level government and politics Chris Wilson Understanding US/UK government and politics A comparative guide DUNCAN WATTS Manchester University Press Manchester and New York distributed exclusively in the USA by Palgrave Copyright © Duncan Watts 2003 The right of Duncan Watts to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Published by Manchester University Press Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9NR, UK and Room 400, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10010,
    [Show full text]
  • Science & Analysis Assurance Review of Her Majesty's Treasury
    Science & Analysis Assurance Review of Her Majesty’s Treasury Government Office for Science Science Review of HMT Contents Foreword .............................................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... ii 1. Science and Analysis Review of The Treasury...................................................................... 1 2. Macroeconomic Analysis......................................................................................................... 4 3. Distributional Analysis ........................................................................................................... 10 4. Public Spending Control ........................................................................................................ 14 5. Staff Turnover and Institutional Memory.............................................................................. 20 6. Transparency, Engagement and Capability Management .................................................. 26 Annex A: List of interviews conducted .......................................................................................... 30 Annex B: Bibliography..................................................................................................................... 32 Annex C: Methodology ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Suffrage in Ontario the Beginning of Women’S Suffrage Movements
    LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY an educational resource OF ONTARIO MESSAGE TO TEACHERS This educational resource was developed to compliment the documentary Women Should Vote: A Short History of how Women Won the Franchise in Ontario (www.ola.org/en/visit-learn/ about-ontarios-parliament/womens-suffrage-ontario), A NOTE ON LANGUAGE which tells the story of the struggle for women’s Some historical terms used in this resource are suffrage in Ontario at the turn of the 20th century. no longer in common use. First Nations peoples in Canada were initially called “Indians” by colonial It invites students to deepen their understanding of Europeans. This term is no longer used, though gender equality and democracy through examining and “Status Indian” is still a legal definition and is analyzing the suffrage movement, and facilitates mentioned throughout this guide. “Status Indian” engaging discussions and activities. Students will does not include all Indigenous peoples – for examine issues of identity, equity, activism and example, Métis and Inuit are excluded (see the justice in historical and contemporary contexts. Glossary on Page 22 for more information). CONTENTS The Suffrage Movement in Running the Good Race ............. 9 Glossary ......................... 22 Ontario: Votes for Women ............ 2 Indigenous Suffrage ............... 11 Activities The Beginning of Women’s Clues from the Archives Suffrage Movements ................ 3 Final Reflections ..................13 (Designed for Grades 8-12) .......23 Should I Support the Vote? The Long Road Timeline of Women’s Suffrage (Designed for Grades 4-7) ........24 to Women’s Suffrage ................ 4 in Ontario and Canada ............. 14 Our Rights Today ................25 A New Century ..................... 5 Feature Figures Appendix A ......................
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of London Annual Report and Financial Statements Year Ended 31St March 2012
    Registered Charity No: 1139250 MUSEUM OF LONDON Governors’ Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 31 March 2012 Museum of London Annual Report and Financial Statements Year Ended 31st March 2012 CONTENTS Reference and administrative details 2 - 4 Annual Report 5 – 23 Independent Auditors’ Report 24 – 25 Consolidated Statement of Financial Activities 26 Consolidated Balance Sheet 27 Museum of London Balance Sheet 28 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 29 - 30 Notes to the Financial Statements 31 - 52 1 Museum of London Annual Report and Financial Statements Year Ended 31st March 2012 REFERENCE AND ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS Name Museum of London Address 150 London Wall London EC2Y 5HN Board of Governors A Board of Governors, consisting of 18 members of whom the Greater London Authority (GLA) (prior to April 2008: the Prime Minister) and the City of London Corporation (COL), each appoints 9 members, is responsible for the general management and control of the Museum. The following Governors served throughout the financial year, except where indicated. Appointed by the Kenneth Ayers (ceased to be a Trustee 22 March 2012) City of London Rt Hon the Lord Boateng P.C. D.L. Corporation Sir Steve Bullock (appointed 20 April 2011) Michael Cassidy CBE Rev Dr Martin Dudley Robert Dufton Tom Hoffman Julian H Malins QC John Scott (appointed 21 June 2012) Michael Welbank Appointed by the GLA Jennette Arnold (prior to April 2008 : by the Blondel Cluff Prime Minister) Rosemary Ewles Gillian Day (appointed 5 October 2011) Andrew Macdonald Camilla Mash Mark Palmer-Edgecumbe Eric Reynolds Eric Sorensen Administration Under the Museum of London Acts 1965 and 1986, the Board is required to appoint a Director of the Museum to be responsible to the Board for: .
    [Show full text]