JAMES METZEN MIGHTY DUCKS Ice Arena Grant Program Information and Guidelines

Home , The Mighty Ducks

AGENDA OF THE CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS TUESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2020 – 5:00 PM

CALL TO ORDER:

CALL OF ROLL:

DETERMINATION OF A QUORUM:

1. Request to Apply for Mighty Duck Grant – Reid Huttunen

2. Consider 2025 Transportation Alternative Program Application for SafeKids – Nancy Ellis

3. Discussion on 2021 Budget – Karla Anderson

ADJOURN:

Upcoming Meetings Regular Council Meeting – Tuesday, December 17, 2020 – 5:00 PM Organizational Meeting – Tuesday, January 5, 2021 – 5:00 PM Regular Council Meeting – Tuesday, January 5, 2021 – Following the Organizational Meeting Work Session – Tuesday, January 12, 2021 – 5:00 PM

Individuals with disabilities, language barriers or other needs who plan to attend the meeting and will need special accommodations should contact Nancy Ellis, ADA Coordinator at (218)-773-2208. Please contact us at least 48 hours before the meeting to give our staff adequate time to make arrangements. Also, materials can be provided in alternative formats for people with disabilities or with limited English proficiency (LEP) by contacting the ADA Coordinator (218)-773-2208 five (5) days prior to the meeting.

1 AGENDA ITEM #______1 Request for Council Action

Date: December 8, 2020

To: East Grand Forks City Council Mayor Steve Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Vice- President Chad Grassel; Council members Clarence Vetter, Dale Helms, Tim Riopelle, Tim Johnson, and Marc DeMers.

Cc: File

From: Reid Huttunen, Parks & Recreation

RE: Request to apply for Mighty Ducks Grant for R22 replacement at Civic Center

Background: In the recent bonding bill passed by the MN State Legislature, $2 Million dollars was allocated to the Mighty Ducks Grant program, administered by Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission. This is the first time since 2016 that the grant has been funded. Of the $2 Million available, it is expected that $1 Million will be awarded to Greater MN communities, and the other $1 Million to metro communities.

There are three types of grants to assist Minnesota communities in: 1. Eliminating R-22 refrigerant for direct systems, up to $500,000 per award 2. Eliminating R-22 refrigerant for indirect systems, up to $250,000 per award 3. Improving indoor air quality, up to $25,000 per award.

This is a one to one dollar matching grant with local source matching funds. Grant applications are due by January 11, 2021, and all awarded projects must be completed by February 28, 2022.

I do not have a final proposal yet, but am expecting that I will have suggested improvements and budget proposal for ice plant improvements and R-22 conversion at the Civic Center before the January grant application deadline. My expectation is that this price proposal would fit within the allotted grant award for replacement of an indirect R22 system. The suggested conversion being reviewed by the NHL and its Ice Industry partners is to make use of some components of our current system, replace some that need to be improved upon, and remove the R-22 refrigerant with Opteon XP40 (R-449A) refrigerant. R-449A is a non-ozone depleting, low global warming potential replacement for R-22.

Budget Impact: Total impact unknown at this time. I hope to have preliminary budget numbers available for the meeting on Tuesday, December 8th. Local Matching dollars to be used in the grant application would include the $30,000 prize from Kraft Hockeyville and potentially could also include Sales Tax revenue surplus from the Swimming Pool tax which was collected through September, 2020. There is about $400,000 available in additional sales tax revenue.

2 AGENDA ITEM #______

Recommendation: Looking for discussion on preparing an application for the Mighty Ducks Grant and using the referenced local funds as a match. Final resolution of local support with commitment of matching funds would be presented for approval at the January 5, 2021 meeting.

Enclosure: Mighty Ducks Grant Information & Guidelines Sample Resolution of Local support Opteon XP40 Product info.

3 JAMES METZEN MIGHTY DUCKS Ice Arena Grant Program Information and Guidelines

WELCOME The Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission is pleased to announce that the James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program was funded by the Minnesota Legislature through a bonding bill in October of 2020. We look forward to receiving your applications and thank you for the work you do to improve the quality of facilities that Minnesota’s youth experience with ice sports. On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission ,welcome. ~Todd Johnson, Executive Director

GENERAL INFORMATION

The State of Minnesota, acting through its agency, the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission (MASC), is seeking proposals from interested communities to improve ice arenas. Minnesota communities will be eligible to be awarded grants for improving indoor air quality in ice arenas or eliminating R-22 refrigerant.

Grant applications must come from a local government unit (LGU), a political subdivision of the State. The LGU will be the fiscal agent for the grant funds and will execute the application form and resolution. Other entities can be the owner and/or operator of the ice arena, thus the beneficiary of the grant award. The grants are for reimbursement of costs for completed projects.

The MASC reserves the right to cancel or amend this solicitation if it is considered to be in its best interest.

Grant Types There are three types of grants to assist Minnesota communities in:

1. Eliminating R-22 refrigerant for direct systems; 2. Eliminating R-22 refrigerant for indirect systems; and 3. Improving indoor air quality.

The result of a successful grant shall be to establish and improve ice arenas capable of hosting all ice sports competitions and training as well as maximize the community’s ability to generate economic benefits by promoting ice sports programming for females and males.

4 Goals The MASC intends for this grant program to accomplish the following goals:

1. Encourage communities and organizations to work in partnership to develop and operate ice arenas. 2. Where possible, to encourage communities and organizations to develop arenas with multiple sheets of ice in order to reduce both construction and operating costs. 3. Provide increased opportunities for female ice sports participation. 4. Encourage the development of ice arenas that serve community sport and non-sport needs and ensure non-hockey groups will also have adequate access to the arenas.

Tasks Respondents are asked to complete the following tasks:

1. Complete responses to the content sections of the application, including addressing the evaluation criteria. 2. Respondent may submit additional information and documentation if they enhance the goals of the project. 3. Successfully comply with the grant terms and complete the project on a timely basis.

Agency Contacts Prospective responders who have questions regarding this application may contact:

Spencer Arvold Jayme Murphy Lynda Lynch Program Director Program Director MASC Fiscal Administrator [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Other agency personnel are NOT allowed to discuss the proposal with anyone, including responders, before the proposal submission deadline. Interested applicants can review and complete an application on the agency’s website: www.mnsports.org/mighty_ducks.stm or request an application from the above contact.

Deadline All applications must be received no later than Monday, January 11, 2021. Send three physical copies and one electronic version (to the email above) of the application to:

MASC – Mighty Ducks Grant 1750 105th Avenue NE Blaine, Minnesota 55449

5 A complete application will include:

1. Application Form 2. Resolution of LGU 3. Responses to content sections of the three specific types of grants and the evaluation criteria for that type of grant.

Grant Amount The MASC is authorized by the 2020 Legislature to appropriate up to $2,000,000 for this program, with limitations on each individual grant amount listed below. Respondents must demonstrate how they intend to augment the state grant with matching funds.

1. Direct R-22 Refrigerant Elimination. Communities may apply for up to $500,000 per arena to replace an existing R-22 direct refrigeration system with a minimum one-to-one dollar match from non-state sources. 2. Indirect R-22 Refrigerant Elimination. Communities may apply for up to $250,000 per rink to replace an existing R-22 indirect refrigeration system with a minimum one-to-one dollar match from non-state sources. 3. Indoor Air Quality Improvement. Communities may apply for up to $25,000 per arena for the replacement, renovation, or addition of automated systems controls for HVAC systems to improve indoor air quality and reduce energy costs. A minimum one-to-one dollar match from non-state sources is required. Electric ice resurfacers are NOT eligible to receive funding through the 2020 grant program.

Project Completion For 2020 grant award recipients, the project must be completed by February 28, 2022.

APPLICATION FORM

1. Enter the name of the Local Government Unit (LGU) responsible. This is the agency with whom the grant agreement will be executed. 2. The LGU Application Contact is an official that can legally sign agreements and will receive all official communications. 3. Project name and physical address. 4. The Primary Contact is an individual who will have direct responsibility for the day-to-day activities of the project and to whom project inquiries can be directed (e.g. Director of the Parks and Recreation Department, Mayor, City Manager, County Engineer, President of the Youth Hockey Association, etc.). 5. Minnesota Tax ID Number of the LGU. Federal Employer ID Number. List the federal employer identification number assigned to the LGU by the Internal Revenue Service. 6. Minnesota House of Representative District Number where the facility is located. See gis.leg.mn/OpenLayers/districts/

6 7. Signature of authorized official of the LGU, such as Chairperson of the County Board, Mayor, or other person as authorized by resolution from the LGU.

RESOLUTION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT

The LGU is required to execute a resolution which authorizes filing of the application and the execution of final agreements with the MASC if their project is selected.

7 GRANT 1: ELIMINATING R-22 REFRIGERANT FOR DIRECT SYSTEMS GRANT 2: ELIMINATING R-22 REFRIGERANT FOR INDIRECT SYSTEMS

Local Financial Commitment. The LGU is required to provide either documentation of funds secured or demonstrate how it intends to fundraise for the local financial commitment. All awards must be matched by non-state funds equal to or greater than the award amount.

Description of Project. Indicate whether the project will replace a direct or indirect refrigeration system and what the new refrigerant will be.

Project Budget. Submit a complete budget for the project.

Operating Budget. Describe the annual operating costs of the current refrigeration system and compare it to the annual operating cost for the new system.

Response to Evaluation Criteria. Either within the above sections or in a separate section, provide material responsive to the Evaluation Criteria listed here:

1. Demonstrated financial need. 2. Partnerships between and among local government units and/or private non-profit groups. 3. Increases in operating efficiency, both monetary and environmental.

GRANT 3: IMPROVING INDOOR AIR QUALITY

Description of Project. Describe the project and how it will improve indoor air quality, and by how much it will improve. If the project includes adding electronic control/monitoring systems, describe the anticipated energy savings in addition to the improvement to air quality.

Project Budget. Submit a complete budget for the project.

Operating Budget. Describe the annual operating costs of the current system and compare it to the annual operating costs after the improvement.

Response to Evaluation Criteria. Either within the above sections or in a separate section, provide material responsive to the Evaluation Criteria listed here:

1. Expected amount of indoor air quality improvement. 2. Ratio of matching funds. A higher than 1-to-1 ratio will be favored.

8 LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES

Applicants should note the specific statutory priorities found in Minnesota Statutes Section 240A.09, as amended in 2020. Specifically, priority will be given to:

 Replacement of ice-making systems in existing public facilities that use R-22 as a refrigerant with systems that use an alternative non-ozone-depleting refrigerant.  Indoor air quality improvements: o Renovation or replacement of heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems in existing indoor ice arenas whose ice resurfacing and ice edging equipment are not powered by electricity in order to reduce concentrations of carbon monoxide and nitrogen dioxide. The new or renovated systems may include continuous electronic air monitoring devices to automatically activate the ventilation systems when the concentration of carbon monoxide or nitrogen dioxide reaches a predetermined level  Proposals that come from more than one local government unit.

DISTRIBUTION OF AWARDS

To the extent possible, the MASC Board of Directors will attempt to balance awards between the Minneapolis-St. Paul metro area and greater Minnesota.

The MASC Board will make final determinations for grant awards. The MASC will prioritize the grant awards based on satisfying the goals of the program as stated above, the legislative requirements expressed in statute, and the specific criteria for each grant type listed above.

STATE CONTRACT RULES

State of Minnesota contract rules will apply to this project.

Updated: November 20, 2020

9 Resolution of LGU James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Application (Sample)

Required content of resolution authorizing filing of application and commitment to execute the grant agreement if funds are awarded:

WHEREAS, the Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission (MASC), via State Bonding funding, provides for general funds to assist political subdivisions of the State of Minnesota for the fulfillment of the purpose and goals of the James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program, and

WHEREAS, the _____(city/county/school district/state agency)_____ desires to complete its project named _____(name of project)_____ at _____(name of facility)_____ located at ____(physical address of facility)_____.

RESOLVED:

1) That the total cost of completing the project shall be $______and ____(city/county/school district/state agency)______is requesting $______from the James Metzen Mighty Ducks Grant Program and will assume responsibility for a matching contribution of $______.

2) _____(city/county/school district/state agency/non-profit corporation)_____ agrees to own, assume 100 percent operational costs for the facility or equipment, and will operate the facility or equipment for its intended purpose for the functional life of the facility or equipment which is estimated to be ______years.

3) _____(city council/county board/school board/state board)_____ agrees to enter into necessary and required agreements with the MASC for the specific purpose of completing the project.

4) That a request for reimbursement be made to the MASC for the amount awarded after the completion of the project.

5) That _____(authorized representative)_____ of _____(city/county/school district/state agency)_____ is authorized and directed to execute said application and serve as the official liaison with the MASC.

CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution presented to and adopted by the ______at a duly authorized meeting thereof held on the _____ day of ______, 20__, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession.

____(signature block of authorized official)______

10 Opteon™ XP40 Refrigerant

Product Information

Opteon™ XP40 (R-449A) is a non-ozone depleting, low Benefits global warming potential (GWP), hydrofluoro-olefin (HFO)- • Low GWP: 67% reduction compared to R-404A/R-507(1) based refrigerant with an optimal balance of properties to replace R-404A/R-507, R-22, or R-407 series in positive • Up to 12% lower energy consumption compared to displacement, direct expansion, low- and medium- R-404A/R-507 temperature commercial and industrial applications. • Safe and nonflammable (ASHRAE(2) A1)

Opteon™ XP40 is suitable for new installations, as well as • Approved by major equipment and component for retrofit of existing systems, offering improved energy manufacturers efficiency and environmental properties. • Alternative to R-407 series low- and medium- temperature refrigerants (equivalent capacity) Applications • Can be topped off after leaks Low- and medium-temperature commercial and industrial DX refrigeration • Extensively field tested and proven

• Supermarkets – No lubricant or seal changes required when retrofitting from R-404A/R-507. Superheat – Centralized rack systems adjustments likely. – Distributed systems – Compatible with existing R-22/R-407 series – Walk-in coolers/freezers, prep rooms, etc. equipment. For R-22 retrofits, oil change and seal replacements are recommended. • Food service (e.g., condensing units)

• Cold storage

• Self-contained systems (1)According to Assessment Report 5 (AR5) (2)American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers • New equipment/retrofit of existing systems

11 Opteon™ XP40 Refrigerant

Opteon™ XP40 Properties ASHRAE Number R-449A Composition R-32/R-125/HFO-1234yf/R-134a Weight % 24.3/24.7/25.3/25.7 Molecular Weight 87.2 g/mole (87.2 lb/lb mole) Boiling Point at 101.3 kPa (1 atm) –46.0 °C (–50.7 °F) Critical Pressure 4447 kPa [abs] (655.0 psia) Critical Temperature 81.5 °C (178.7 °F) Liquid Density at 21.1 °C (70 °F) 1113.3 kg/m3 (69.5 lb/ft3) Ozone Depletion Potential (CFC-11 = 1.0) 0 AR5 Global Warming Potential 1282 ASHRAE Safety Classification A1 Temperature Glide ~4 K (~7 °R)

What to expect after retrofitting The data below was obtained from a display case/condensing unit converted to Opteon™ XP40 from R-404A with only adjustments to the EEV (updated for R-449A PT curve) during low- and medium-temperature operation at indoor conditions specified by AHR Standard 1200. Test setup was in accordance with ASHRAE Standard 72-2005.(4)

Medium Temperature Low Temperature Ambient Temperature 28 °C (82 °F) 35 °C (95 °F) 28 °C (82 °F) 35 °C (95 °F) Energy Consumption –8% –12% –3% –4% Relative Mass Flow –16% –17% –19% –21% Suction Pressure -27.5 kPa (-4.0 psi) -31.0 kPa (-4.5 psi) -8.0 kPa (-1.2 psi) -11.7 kPa (-1.7 psi) Discharge Pressure –48.2 kPa (–7 psi) -34.5 kPa (–5 psi) –31 kPa (–4.5 psi) –37.2 kPa (–5.4 psi) Discharge Temperature +3 K (+5.4 °R) +2 K (+3.6 °R) +5 K (+9 °R) +5 K (+9 °R)

+ is an increase, - is a decrease relative to R-404A (4)Actual performance for a specific system depends on a number of factors, including equipment conditions and operating environment. For more information on the Opteon™ family of refrigerants, or other refrigerants products, visit opteon.com or call (800) 235-7882.

The information set forth herein is furnished free of charge and based on technical data that Chemours believes to be reliable. It is intended for use by persons having technical skill, at their own risk. Because conditions of use are outside our control, Chemours makes no warranties, expressed or implied, and assumes no liability in connection with any use of this information. Nothing herein is to be taken as a license to operate under, or a recommendation to infringe, any patents or patent applications. © 2018 The Chemours Company FC, LLC. Opteon™ and any associated logos are trademarks or copyrights of The Chemours Company FC, LLC. Chemours™ and the Chemours Logo are trademarks of The Chemours Company. Replaces: K-28827 C-10021 (1/18)

12 AGENDA ITEM #______2

Request for Council Action

Date: December 8, 2020

To: East Grand Forks City Council Mayor Steve Gander, Council President Mark Olstad, Council Vice-President Chad Grassel, Council members Clarence Vetter, Dale Helms, Tim Riopelle, Tim Johnson, and Marc DeMers.

Cc: File

From: Nancy Ellis, Community Development Director

RE: 2025 Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) Application for SafeKids programming

BACKGROUND AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION OF REQUEST:

In October, SafeKids submitted a Letter of Intent to apply for the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funding for the year 2025. They are requesting non-infrastructure dollars for safe routes to school programming in East Grand Forks and surrounding northern communities. The funds would be a critical part in continuing to fund SafeKids; as they have been a valuable resource for our schools, public safety departments, parks and recreation and transportation planning and implementation.

In order for them to submit a full application, they must have the City act as the sponsoring agency for their application. SafeKids provides continuing education to our students as to how to walk or bike safely to school and are a necessary function for our community’s safety. They have received TAP and/or SRTS grants in the past and I feel that we should continue to support SafeKids with our sponsorship.

Currently, the TAP project (if awarded); is funded at an 80/20 split minus engineering costs. The total project cost is: $41,727 for the Safe Kids work = 80% grant funding of $33127 with $8600 required in local match. This work is normally funded out of our General Fund, however, they are working with Altru, the school district, and the other communities to help with the local share.

RECOMMENDATION:

I am asking City Council to approve submitting the non-infrastructure grant application for Safe Kids and approve the resolution to act as sponsoring agency.

- 1 - 13 Greater Minnesota Transportation Alternatives Solicitation

2020/21 Full Application

Funding in year 2025

Full Application 1 14 Overview

For the 2020/21 application cycle, MnDOT is conducting a solicitation for Transportation Alternatives (TA) projects. Important eligibility requirements to be aware of are noted below.

 The TA funding available through this solicitation is for project construction in fiscal year 2025. TA funding requires a 20 percent local match. Only projects located outside of the seven-county metropolitan area are eligible for TA funding. Maximum funding awards are set by each Area Transportation Partnership.

See the TA Solicitation Guidebook for more information about the program and additional eligibility requirements. 2020/21 Solicitation Timeline

 Thursday, October 1st, 2020 – Announce TA solicitation. Open letter of intent period.  Friday, October 30th, 2020 – Deadline for applicants to submit letters of intent.  Friday, November 13th, 2020 – Deadline for RDO/MPO/district review of letters of intent. Recommendation to proceed forward with full application given to applicants.  Monday, November 16th, 2020 – Official start of full application period.  Friday, January 8th, 2021 – Deadline for applicants to submit full applications.  Thursday, April 15th, 2021 – Deadline for ATPs to select TA projects.

Full Application 2 15 Transportation Alternatives Full Application

General Information

Notes:

 If the overall project contains ineligible elements, please mention the entire project in the brief project description but concentrate the application and budget on the elements that are eligible for the funding you are seeking.

 Sponsoring Agencies, if sponsoring for another project applicant, are advised to have dialog with the project applicant to ascertain the level of commitment by the applicant to follow through on delivery of the project, including the potential use of eminent domain.

Project Information

Name of project: East Grand Forks & NW MN Safe Routes to School Program Coordination

Project is located in which county(ies): Polk County, Marshall County, Roseau County

Brief project description: Safe Kids Grand Forks would like to continue with SRTS activity coordination and add additional components to this program that will encourage walking / biking activities. Our primary focus area will be on East Grand Forks, MN but we will also coordinate and carry out programming in Crookston, Oslo, Roseau, Greenbush and Warroad, MN

Project applicant: Safe Kids Grand Forks – City of East Grand Forks, MN

Contact Information

Contact person (from applicant agency/organization): Carma Hanson

Mailing address: 607 DeMers Avenue

City: East Grand Forks State: MN Zip: 56721

Phone: 701.739.1591 Fax: 218.773.2994 Email: [email protected]

Sponsoring agency (if different than applicant): City of East Grand Forks

Contact person (from sponsoring agency, if different than applicant): Nancy Ellis

Full Application 3 16 Project Budget

Notes:

 Please identify what costs will be incurred to carry out the proposed project, using the following budget categories as a guideline. Where appropriate, break down your costs by units purchased. For example: number of acres, cubic yards of fill, etc. Attach additional sheets if necessary.

 Cost estimates are to be submitted in current year dollars1.

Table A – Eligible Items

Eligible work/construction item Estimated quantity Unit cost Total cost SRTS Coordination and 530 Hours $32 $16,960 Programming Salary (see additional budget detail further into this application) SRTS Program Supply Costs N/A N/A $16,167 (see additional budget detail further into this application) Grant Administration Costs 40 hours $45 $1800 Office Space / IT Services / Phones 12 months $400 $4800 Bike storage facility space 10 months $200 $2000

Table B – Ineligible Items2

Ineligible work/construction item Estimated quantity Unit cost Total cost

1 Grant recipients will need to provide a match based on the year of construction estimate developed when the grant is awarded. 2 Includes Right of Way or Land Acquisition (e.g. appraisal fees, legal fees), Administrative Costs (e.g. preliminary and construction engineering and contingencies)

Full Application 4 17 Total Project Budget 1. Total cost of proposed project (Total Table A + Total Table B): $41,727 2. Items not eligible for TA funding (Total Table B): $ 0 3. Total eligible costs – recommended range $100,000 to $1 million3 (Total Table A): $41,527 4. Applicant’s contribution toward the eligible alternative project costs – minimum 20% match required: $8600 5. Total amount requested in transportation alternatives funds (#3 minus #4): $33,167

ATP Project Evaluation

Each ATP is responsible for developing this section of the TA application. This section should include the additional information and questions required in order to implement the specific project selection process and criteria developed by each ATP. The information requested in this section should be above and beyond what is already asked for in the previous pages of this document, not duplicated.

3 See the ATP Project Evaluation section of this document for any additional requirements related to project costs.

Full Application 5 18 MPO Project Evaluation

For projects in MPO areas, the MPO may have its own ranking criteria. Each MPO is responsible for developing this section of the TA application. This section should include the additional information and questions required in order to implement the specific project selection process and criteria developed by each MPO. The information requested in this section should be above and beyond what is already asked for in the previous pages of this document, not duplicated.

Full Application 19 6 Sponsoring Agency Resolution

Notes:

 A resolution of sponsorship from the sponsoring agency is required for each project. The resolution must be approved by an eligible sponsoring agency. Please attach an original signed copy of the resolution. An example of sample language which can be used by a sponsoring agency is listed below.

Sample Resolution Language

Be it resolved that [city, county or agency name] agrees to act as sponsoring agency for the project identified as [project name] seeking [type of funding seeking] and has reviewed and approved the project as proposed. Sponsorship includes a willingness to secure and guarantee the local share of costs associated with this project and responsibility for seeing this project through to its completion, with compliance of all applicable laws, rules and regulations.

Be it further resolved that [sponsoring agency contact person name] is hereby authorized to act as agent on behalf of this sponsoring agency.

Certification

I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by [city, county or agency name] on this [date] day of [month], [year].

SIGNED: WITNESSED:

(Signature) (Signature)

(Title) (Title)

(Date) (Date)

Full Application 20 7 Resolution Agreeing to Maintain Facility

Notes:

 A Resolution agreeing to maintain the facility for its useful life is also required for each project. The resolution must be approved by an eligible sponsoring agency. Please attach an original signed copy of the resolution. An example of sample language which can be used by a sponsoring agency is listed below.

Sample Resolution Language

WHEREAS: The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requires that states agree to operate and maintain facilities constructed with federal transportation funds for the useful life of the improvement and not change the use of right of way or property ownership acquired without prior approval from the FHWA; and

WHEREAS: Transportation Alternatives projects receive federal funding; and

WHEREAS: the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has determined that for projects implemented with alternative funds, this requirement should be applied to the project proposer; and

WHEREAS: [city county or agency name] is the sponsoring agency for the transportation alternatives project identified as [project name].

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT: the sponsoring agency hereby agrees to assume full responsibility for the operation and maintenance of property and facilities related to the aforementioned transportation alternatives project.

Certification

I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted by [city, county or agency name] on this [date] day of [month], [year].

SIGNED: WITNESSED:

(Signature) (Signature)

(Title) (Title)

(Date) (Date)

Full Application 21 8 Application Checklist

Each ATP is responsible for developing a checklist for as a tool for the applicant to ensure all the required information and documentation has been included prior to submittal. The checklist should reflect both the standard application components as well as the information requested specific to each ATP.

Full Application 22 9 Signatures

Notes: Signatures are required from the following – project applicant; sponsoring agency engineer, if different than the project applicant; a representative of the local unit of government in which the project is located; and the MPO Executive Director, if the project is located in a MPO area.

(Applicant Signature) (Date)

(Sponsoring Agency Engineer Signature) (Date)

(Local Unit of Government Signature) (Date)

(If in MPO area, signature of MPO Executive Director) (Date)

Full Application 23 10 Project Information

1. Amount of funding requested: $33,127 Number of Number Total Activity Location Occurrences of Hours Hours Education Programming Safety on Wheels Presentation to 3rd Grade Classes / Prep time for packets and presentation 1 6 6 Fisher, MN Safety on Wheels Presentation to 3rd Grade Classes / Prep time for packets and Roseau, Warroad, presentation 1 8 8 Greenbush, MN Safety on Wheels Presentation to 3rd Grade Classes / Prep time for packets and presentation 1 6 6 Oslo, MN Safety on Wheels Presentation to 3rd Grade Classes / Prep time for packets and Crookston, MN - 2 presentation 2 6 12 elementary schools Safety on Wheels Presentation to 3rd Grade Classes / Prep time for packets and 2 4 8 presentation South Point Elementary Safety on Wheels Bike Helmet New Heights 1 4 4 Distributions Elementary

"Getting to School Safely " Pedestrian 32 hours Safety Presentations - Done in K - 5th per grade with each classroom (1 gym class 4 8 person x 2 per session, x 2 staff/1 for bike and one South Point Elementary people = for pedestrian, CPS and Bus safety / New Heights 64 hours covered by other volunteer folks) Elementary South Point Elementary Back-to-School Open House Orientation 2 4 8 / New Heights (Parents and students) Elementary 3 locations BTS Community Event (Parents, students, x 8 hours 3 locations 8 community members) x 3 people Grocery Store locations = 72 in EGF, Crookston, hours Roseau

Safety Patrol Orientation and South Point Elementary 20 20 Coordination and regional schools

Full Application 24 11 Incentive and Encouragement Campaigns Wheeling Wednesday Fall Event (6-8 weeks) 8 3 24 South Point Elementary Wheeling Wednesday Spring Event (6-8 weeks) 8 3 24 South Point Elementary

Fire Up Your Feet Friday Coordination and New Heights Events 12 3 36 Elementary

South Point Elementary Caught in the Crosswalk Incentive / New Heights Program 4 2 8 Elementary

South Point Elementary I Got Caught (Bike/Helmet Incentive / New Heights Program) Coordination 1 8 8 Elementary / Crookston

Bike To School Day Coordination and 4 (2 spring - South Point Elementary Event 2 fall) 4 16 and regional schools International Walk To School Day 4 (2 spring - South Point Elementary Coordination and Event 2 fall) 4 16 and regional schools

Bike Fleet Management South Point Elementary & Potentially Central Bike Fleet Coordination 20 20 Middle School South Point Elementary & Potentially Central Bike Fleet / Gym Class Programming 20 20 Middle School South Point Elementary Teacher Training for Bike Fleet Education & Potentially Central 4 staff 8 32 Middle School Program Communication School Newsletter Material Preparation (Fall - BTS bike and pedestrian safety, South Point Elementary Winter - winter pedestrian safety, Spring - / New Heights bike safety, Summer - summer biking, Elementary / Regional wheeled sports and pedestrian safety) 4 1 4 Schools South Point Elementary Back-to-School PSA creation and / New Heights distribution 1 2 2 Elementary / Regionally

Full Application 25 12 South Point Elementary / New Heights BTS radio interviews 1 2 2 Elementary / Regionally South Point Elementary / New Heights Winter walking safety radio interview 1 2 2 Elementary / Regionally South Point Elementary / New Heights Spring biking safety radio interview 1 2 2 Elementary / Regionally South Point Elementary Safe Kids Grand Forks Quarterly / New Heights Newsletter 4 2 8 Elementary / Regionally South Point Elementary Social media / New Heights education/campaign/management 30 0.5 15 Elementary / Regionally

Program Administration Monthly MN Safe Routes to School Conference Calls 12 1 12 School administration meetings / planning 15 National SRTS Monthly Training Sessions 12 1 12 Monthly Reporting 12 1 12 National SRTS Conference Attendance 4 8 32 530 Hours x $32.00 (hourly salary + Total benefits) $16,960

Safe Routes to School Program Supplies Item Cost Quantity Total Printer certificates / forms / Training supplies for Safety on Wheels flyers $1 200 $200 SOW Bike Training supplies for Safety on Wheels Books $1.25 200 $250

Full Application 26 13 Helmets for low-income clients Bike helmet $12.00 30 $360 Getting to School Safely Program Flyers / Materials props $100 $100 Display and printed BTS Open House Display Materials materials $100 2 $200 Event Supplies / BTS Community Event FB Boosting $200 $200 Snacks for the Safety Patrol Orientation Supplies Patrollers $20 $20 End of year Safety Patrol thank you $15 12 $180 Granola bars, orange juice, fruit, or yogurt, Wheeling Wednesday Supplies etc. $50 16 $800 End of campaign prize Wheeling Wednesday Supplies drawings $50 4 $200 Granola bars, orange juice, fruit or yogurt, Fire Up Your Feet Friday etc. $50 12 $600 End of campaign prize Fire Up Your Feet Friday drawings $50 4 $200 Caught in the Crosswalk Incentive Incentive Campaign Items $120 4 $480 Bike Fleet Supplies Bicycles $120 30 $3,600 Bike Fleet Supplies Locks $12 30 $360 Bike Fleet Supplies Racks $500 4 $2,000

Miscellaneous Supplies (tire Bike Fleet Supplies pumps, etc.) $150 $150 Radio Ads x Back-to-School PSA 2 weeks $750 $750

Full Application 27 14 Television Ads x 2 Back-to-School PSA weeks $750 $750 Social media content boost Boost funds $200 $200 Community Education flyers / ads $500 $500 Cones / vest / STOP paddles / No crossing signs $750 $500 Reflective items $1 1000 $1,000 (131 miles 1 way) x 2 Mileage - Roseau / Warroad / Greenbush) trips = 525 x 2 miles $0.575 525 $301.88 (25 miles 1 way) x 2 trips = 100 Mileage Crookston x 2 miles $0.575 100 $57.50 (27 miles 1 way) x 1 tips Mileage - Oslo x 1 - 54 miles $0.575 54 $31.05

(14 miles 1 way) x 1 trip Mileage - Fisher x 1 = 28 miles $0.575 28 $16.10 Conference National SRTS Conference Registration $500.000 1 $500.00 Airline National SRTS Conference Ticket $600 1 $600.00 National SRTS Conference Hotel $300 3 $900.00 National SRTS Conference Meals $40 4 $160 Total $16,167

Salary Total $16,960 Supply Total $16,167 Total Budget Request $33,127

We will obtain the 20% match from our lead agency for Safe Kids Grand Forks which is Altru Health System, the EGF Public School District, and/or the City of East Grand Forks.

2. Project request type (capital, planning, both): Planning

Full Application 28 15 Project Plan to Include Additional SRTS Activities and Communities (Amended from when LOI was completed with new information highlighted in red.)

Describe the work you want to do for which you are seeking support. Include a description of the project development activities for this project completed to date:

Safe Kids Grand Forks has been involved in providing safe routes to school education and planning for East Grand Forks and their two elementary and one middle school for several years. We have also done extensive work in this area on the North Dakota side of the river, but the work of our coalition has expanded to include numerous new partners on the Minnesota side as well. As our coalition and capacity has grown, we have fostered new initiatives in the area of child passenger safety. Those partners have also translated into additional people to assist with and engage in pedestrian safety initiatives that could enhance the health and safety of students in our Minnesota service area (including northwest MN). Much of our work focuses on education of students, parents and the community, creating for a safer environment to get kids to school whether they walk, bike or ride in a car or bus. With this grant funding, we will provide education via a variety of interventions (newsletters, back-to-school open houses, radio commercials, social media, television commercials, in-class education, etc.). This education will be enhanced with encouragement activities that promote the behavior we are looking for in those getting to and from school (crosswalk use, helmet use, etc.) The funding will also provide support for supplies needed for the education and creation of a safer environment (cones, crossing guard and safety patrol supplies, etc.). Added to this school district and community’s SRTS plan will be the addition of a bike fleet to be used for bike-to-school and “Takin’ It To the Streets” activities. This was added as many of the kids live too far from the schools to actually ride their bikes to school. We will purchase a bike fleet (30 bikes total) that will be used as part of the physical education program at the upper level elementary school and the middle school in East Grand Forks. Safe Kids Grand Forks has created a program called “Takin’It To the Streets”. Through our “Safety on Wheels” program, students in third grade, receive a head injury and bike helmet presentation and distribution of helmets from Safe Kids Grand Forks. Following that education, a bike rodeo is conducted in the school’s parking lot. The “Takin’ It To the Streets” program is geared for 5th or 6th graders and is held during gym class. On day one of the program, Safe Kids provides a presentation on the benefits of biking, a review of how to properly fit and wear a helmet and instructions on the rules of the road. We discuss the differences/benefits of trail riding vs. street riding and prepare the students for a bike adventure the following day. Day two consists of a guided bike ride on a route that allows students to not only ride on the streets, but access trails and bike paths as well. Because of the large size of the EGF School District, many students are not be able to ride a bike to school to facilitate doing this without bike accessibility. Therefore, having access to a bike fleet will allow us to carry out this program as part of the physical education classes. Our plan is to purchase a bike fleet and share it amongst the elementary school and middle school students to be used in their gym classes.

Full Application 29 16 Over the years, Safe Kids Grand Forks has worked with the East Grand Forks School System, the MPO, the City Community Development Department and the City Engineering Department to create safer environments around the schools. This has included installation of sidewalks, pedestrian islands, improved signage, enhanced crosswalks and changes to roadways to include marked turn lanes, etc. While we are aware that engineering changes can greatly affect the safety of the area, we also know that education is critical to a comprehensive injury prevention program. Our hope is that this grant will continue to support our efforts in that area. In addition to covering East Grand Forks with our injury prevention programming, we have expanded this grant request to include our additional coverage area and continue our work in Crookston, Fisher, Roseau, Warroad, Greenbush and Oslo, MN. In the past, time for this work was covered by the lead agency of Safe Kids Grand Forks which is Altru Health System. In 2020, the program was tasked with finding additional partners to assist with the on-going operational costs of Safe Kids Grand Forks’ injury prevention work. Should funding for this work not be secured, the efforts we have started and hope to continue will be in jeopardy for northwest Minnesota.

Describe how your project meets a transportation purpose:

There are generally four ways in which kids get to and from school: walking, biking (or some other type of wheeled transportation), motor vehicles or on the bus. This project provides the education about the importance of safe behaviors in these transportation modes, especially the ones in which they have the most control over their decisions: walking/biking. Getting to and from school safely is important not only to the school district, but to parents and community. These on-going education and encouragement activities surrounding desired behaviors is an ever-present need as new students enter into the school system annually.

I would like to expand upon how our proposed work meets the four defined objectives articulate for the Greater Minnesota Transportation Alternatives Solicitation Statewide Program:

1. Promote Projects Identified through a Planning Process ______Safe Kids Grand Forks has been in existence for nearly 30 years and we have extensive experience in working with injury prevention program creation, implementation and evaluation. Our member network consists of many partners that come to the table and say, “what can we do better together than any one of us could do alone?”. That team of folks sets out to plan strategies that we know are cost effective and proven to work, not only in our community but around the country. Our team works hard to stay current in the best practices and networks with others doing like-type projects so we can provide a quality plan.

Full Application 30 17 The work we are proposing in East Grand Forks and northwestern Minnesota has been put together with other players on our team (as articulated in the letters of support and expanded below).

As mentioned in our Letter of Intent, some of this work is outlined in the following plans and is also a part of our Safe Kids Grand Forks Action Plan: 2018 City Sub Target Funds and Pedestrian Improvements, Bygland Road Study, New Heights, South Point and Central Middle School Safe Routes to School Studies, ADA Transition Plan (including work around our public and private Schools), EGF Public School's Facility Reconstruction Plan (New Heights, South Point and Central Middle School)

2. Support Safe Routes to School ______As you can see from our proposed action steps, this plan is all about supporting the SRTS programming that has been funded in the past by other SRTS grants or the lead agency of Safe Kids Grand Forks, Altru Health System. While some programs have a completion date, we know that the school system has new students entering into it year after year. While we have done work to train others within the school system to carry out some of the pedestrian and wheeled sports work (safety patrollers, crossing guards, service club, etc.), we know that there is an element of coordination that is best served by our organization. We also know that the schools don’t currently have the bandwidth to take on all the work that is being done by Safe Kids Grand Forks. Should the support of Safe Kids Grand Forks and this grant not be provided, many, if not most of these programming and injury prevention strategies would fall by the wayside for future kids in these schools around our region. We will continue to “train the trainer” and delegate projects as we are able, but also serve as a catalyst for many of these interventions to be launched and/or sustained.

3. Serve a Transportation Purpose

As noted previously, many of the students in the East Grand Forks School District live a considerable distance from the schools as there is only one K-2nd grade elementary school, one 3rd – 5th grade elementary school and one middle school for the entire community. That said, many kids arrive at the K-2 school by car or bus since they live too far to walk or bike. When they do transition to South Point (3rd – 5th grade), they are in a more residential neighborhood where walking and biking would be more feasible. However, they also have had little experience with getting to school in this manner so providing them with support for that would be part of our plan (Fire Up Your Feet Fridays, Wheeling Wednesdays, etc.).

We also know that in order to incorporate biking into the gym curriculum, the school would have to provide the bikes as many students live too far away to feasibly ride their bike to school for an activity such as this. There are also students that due to their financial status, are not able to afford a bike for their personal or school use. However, providing the bikes will allow the school to show kids how to ride bike on streets, trails and the Greenway paths. This in turn should open-up the opportunity for students to use this type of transportation as an option, not only for getting to and from school but in other facets of their life.

Full Application 31 18 4. Ensure Project Delivery

Safe Kids Grand Forks has been in existence for nearly 30 years and we have a long-standing reputation of being a “go-to” source for injury prevention programming and implementation. The Safe Kids Grand Forks Coordinator has extensive experience and has been with the team for 25 years and has a capable team working with her. The coalition also has a Pedestrian and Wheeled Sports Safety Subcommittee that assists with project planning and implementation. The funding that we are asking for will support work that we have a long-standing history of carrying out in both North Dakota and Minnesota. While many of these action steps will remain the same over time since they are proven effective (bike helmet use, etc.), our coalition is always working to bring about new and creative strategies to prevent injuries and death and to promote biking, walking and a healthy lifestyle.

While we won’t rearticulate our history of delivering federally funded projects since that was done in the Letter of Intent, we will assure you that we have the team and expertise in place to carry out the outlined tasks of this proposal. We thank you for your consideration of this grant request and thank you in advance for placing your trust in our work and in our team. We have listed some of our planning partners below:

Planning Partners: Earl Haugen – Executive Director, GF-EGF MPO has provided us with encouragement to apply and is aware of the LOI being submitted. Nancy Ellis – EGF City Planner is a member of our coalition and has provided us with assistance in the LOI and planning for this grant application. Dr. Jim Torkelson – Director of Operations, New Heights Elementary and South Point Elementary Schools, East Grand Forks, MN Stephanie Halford – City Planner, Grand Forks and Chairperson for our Safe Kids Grand Forks Pedestrian and Wheeled Sports Safety Subcommittee Julie Pederson – Principal, New Heights Elementary School, East Grand Forks, MN Chad Grassel – Principal, South Point Elementary School, East Grand Forks, MN Paula Hedlund – Health Coach, Roseau, MN ______- Crookston Public School

Full Application 32 19 RESOLUTION NO.

RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESPONSIBILITY AS THE SPONSORING AGENCY

Council Member , supported by Council Member, introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:

BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of East Grand Forks act as sponsoring agency for a Safe Routes to School project identified as SafeKids East Grand Forks & NW MN Safe Routes to School Program Coordination (noninfrastructure Safe Routes to School programming and materials) and is seeking Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) funding. The City of East Grand Forks has reviewed and approved the project as proposed. Sponsorship includes a willingness to secure and guarantee the local share of costs associated with this project and responsibility for seeing this project through to its completion, with compliance of all applicable laws, rules and regulations.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Nancy Ellis, Community Development Director, is hereby authorized to act as agent on behalf of this applicant.

Voting Aye: Voting Nay: Absent:

The President declared the resolution.

Passed:

Attest:

______City Administrator President of Council

I hereby approve the foregoing resolution this 8th day of December , 2020.

______Mayor

33 #3

DATE: 12/4/2020 TO: Council FROM: Karla Anderson

 No increase or decrease in FT position from the 2020 Budget to the 2021 Budget.

 COLA-Cost of Living Adjustment for 2021 1.5%

 Reduction in LGA from 2020 to 2021 $ 88,750 Here is a list of items that have changed from the 2020 Budget to the 2021 Budget:  Increase in Wages/Benefits (Including insurance) $250,471 4% o Insurance amount of increase alone was $154,406 4%  Legal costs $35,000  Election Savings ($18,000)  City Engineer $10,000  Transit transfer Savings ($106,000)  Snow Removal OT $18,000  Street Light Utilities Savings ($10,000)

DEPT SUPPLIES/OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES INCREASES  Police (misc small tools, uniforms, software) $18,000  Library (small tools and equipment) $2,600  Planning, zoning (Prof Services) $3,050  Public Works (Central Equip-payloader payment) $26,377  Parks (small tools) $2,000

Budgeted Travel Expenses for 2020 and no increase in 2021 $77,571

CAPITAL ITEMS FOR 2021:  Police SUV $50,000  Fire 4 door pickup $43,000  Parks Dump Truck $50,000  Public works Street Reconstruction $250,000  Public Works Tool Cat $39,410

34 Changes in budget since November 24, 2020 Savings:  Police SUV $50,000  Parks Pickup $45,000  Parks Playground Equip $30,000  Public Works mower with cab $80,000  Payroll spreadsheet correction $39,000  Public works tool cat trade $20,590

Increases:  Police/ K-9 OT $9,000  Adjustments for payroll/insurance $3,723

35 CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS, MINNESOTA GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SUMMARY December 8, 2020

CHANGE OVER Actual Actual Actual Budget Budget 2020 BUDGET 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 AMOUNT %

REVENUES/SOURCES Property Tax Levy* $ 4,453,551 $ 4,815,813 $ 5,069,878 $ 5,442,241 $ 5,714,353 $ 272,112 5.0% Franchise & Other Taxes 1,574,633 1,661,882 1,664,056 1,553,307 1,529,431 $ (23,875) -1.5% Licenses & Permits 141,454 110,686 119,969 98,925 98,325 $ (600) -0.6% Intergovernmental 2,894,461 2,971,572 2,914,670 2,661,609 2,586,434 $ (75,175) -2.8% Charges for Services 1,140,451 1,297,919 1,243,177 1,273,442 1,261,469 $ (11,973) -0.9% Fines & Forfeits 143,477 120,626 155,567 118,000 118,000 $ - 0.0% Other Revenues 118,197 112,939 334,980 77,400 73,600 $ (3,800) -4.9% Other Financing Sources 288,154 111,392 123,194 182,987 232,695 $ 49,708 27.2% Total Revenues/Other Sources$ 10,754,376 $ 11,202,828 $ 11,625,492 $ 11,407,910 $ 11,614,307 $ 206,397 1.8% Reserved Used/Excess - Total Available Resources $ 10,754,376 $ 11,202,828 $ 11,625,492 $ 11,407,910 $ 11,614,307 $ 206,397 1.8%

EXPENDITURES/USES Current: General Government $ 1,077,051 $ 1,191,741 $ 1,290,029 $ 1,283,228 $ 1,328,042 $ 44,813 3.5% Police 2,625,964 2,684,692 2,891,136 2,902,590 2,994,455 $ 91,866 3.2% Fire 1,391,253 1,403,965 1,438,294 1,458,313 1,485,825 $ 27,512 1.9% Other Public Safety 198,220 188,476 174,890 194,079 195,360 $ 1,281 0.7% Public Works 1,187,342 1,284,693 1,394,133 1,527,792 1,675,906 $ 148,114 9.7% Recreation & Culture 1,584,977 1,637,177 1,789,177 1,926,135 1,921,558 $ (4,577) -0.2% Community Development 49,937 72,015 64,477 67,987 77,695 $ 9,708 14.3% Library 576,476 636,442 667,322 716,377 753,556 $ 37,179 5.2% Senior Center 124,817 112,862 121,242 134,054 137,328 $ 3,274 2.4% Other Expenditures 308,171 288,801 321,110 305,860 329,300 $ 23,440 7.7% Capital Outlay & Other Uses: General Government - - - - - Police 153,421 153,107 76,056 92,000 50,000 $ (42,000) -45.7% Fire 21,949 - 54,374 - 43,000 $ 43,000 Public Works 59,287 59,761 28,908 35,000 39,410 $ 4,410 12.6% Street Reconstruction 250,000 252,001 172,647 250,000 250,000 $ - 0.0% Recreation & Culture 47,083 106,381 150,492 56,000 50,000 $ (6,000) -10.7% Other Expenditures 47,000 192,286 168,307 149,000 189,000 $ 40,000 26.8% Debt Service 105,217 105,217 108,157 88,051 89,836 $ 1,785 2.0% Other Financing Uses 219,392 221,366 228,200 403,671 257,812 $ (145,859) -36.1% $ 10,027,557 $ 10,590,982 $ 11,138,951 $ 11,590,137 $ 11,868,084 $ 277,947 2.4%

Fund Balance Increase 32% $ 477,179 0

Revenues/Sources Over (Under) Expenditures and chg Fund Balance$ 249,640 $ 611,847 $ 486,541 $ (182,227) $ (253,777) $ (71,550)

36 CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS, MINNESOTA

GENERAL FUND

Change ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Over Classification 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2020

Personnel Services $ 6,353,291 $ 6,396,135 $ 6,849,382 $ 7,106,944 $ 7,390,609 4.0% Supplies 297,874 427,140 466,291 514,746 525,896 2.2% Other Charges 2,411,664 2,649,253 2,772,750 2,864,726 2,952,521 3.1% Capital Outlay 590,781 638,962 570,678 578,000 617,410 6.8% Transfers Out 371,609 479,492 447,357 525,722 381,648 -27.4%

TOTAL $ 10,025,218 $ 10,590,982 $ 11,106,459 $ 11,590,137 $ 11,868,084 2.4%

Expenditures by Classification 2021 General Fund Budget

Capital Outlay 5% Transfers Out 3% Other Charges 25% Personnel Services 62%

Supplies 5%

37 CITY OF EAST GRAND FORKS, MINNESOTA

GENERAL FUND SUMMARY OF PERSONNEL SERVICE EXPENDITURES

Change % of ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET BUDGET Over Total Classification 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2020 Personnel

General Government$ 604,315 $ 637,836 $ 669,365 $ 688,215 $ 699,622 1.7% 9.5% Public Safety 3,588,921 3,611,016 3,827,647 3,834,098 3,938,091 2.7% 53.3% Public Works 647,198 635,454 673,973 779,555 909,004 16.6% 12.3% Recreation & Culture 980,248 965,537 1,091,833 1,173,975 1,172,548 -0.1% 15.9% Library 441,780 467,100 504,864 534,737 568,916 6.4% 7.7% Senior Center 86,783 76,364 76,018 92,004 96,628 5.0% 1.3% Other Expenditures 4,046 2,828 5,683 4,360 5,800 33.0% 0.1%

TOTAL $ 6,353,291 $ 6,396,135 $ 6,849,382 $ 7,106,944 $ 7,390,609 100.0%

Personnel Services General Fund by Function

$4,000,000

$3,500,000

$3,000,000

$2,500,000

$2,000,000

$1,500,000

$1,000,000

Public Safety $500,000 Recreation & Culture

$0 Public Works

2017 General ACTUAL 2018 ACTUAL 2019 Government ACTUAL 2020 BUDGET 2021 BUDGET