Scotland's Future
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Poor Relief and the Church in Scotland, 1560−1650
George Mackay Brown and the Scottish Catholic Imagination Scottish Religious Cultures Historical Perspectives An innovative study of George Mackay Brown as a Scottish Catholic writer with a truly international reach This lively new study is the very first book to offer an absorbing history of the uncharted territory that is Scottish Catholic fiction. For Scottish Catholic writers of the twentieth century, faith was the key influence on both their artistic process and creative vision. By focusing on one of the best known of Scotland’s literary converts, George Mackay Brown, this book explores both the Scottish Catholic modernist movement of the twentieth century and the particularities of Brown’s writing which have been routinely overlooked by previous studies. The book provides sustained and illuminating close readings of key texts in Brown’s corpus and includes detailed comparisons between Brown’s writing and an established canon of Catholic writers, including Graham Greene, Muriel Spark and Flannery O’Connor. This timely book reveals that Brown’s Catholic imagination extended far beyond the ‘small green world’ of Orkney and ultimately embraced a universal human experience. Linden Bicket is a Teaching Fellow in the School of Divinity in New College, at the University of Edinburgh. She has published widely on George Mackay Brown Linden Bicket and her research focuses on patterns of faith and scepticism in the fictive worlds of story, film and theatre. Poor Relief and the Cover image: George Mackay Brown (left of crucifix) at the Italian Church in Scotland, Chapel, Orkney © Orkney Library & Archive Cover design: www.hayesdesign.co.uk 1560−1650 ISBN 978-1-4744-1165-3 edinburghuniversitypress.com John McCallum POOR RELIEF AND THE CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1560–1650 Scottish Religious Cultures Historical Perspectives Series Editors: Scott R. -
Tie Line 2 Business Case Final
Document Status This document has been prepared at the request of the Private Bills Unit to provide the Committee of MSPs considering the Bill for Tram Line Two with an updated position relative to the equivalent version submitted in December 2003. This document should be regarded as a working draft as significant aspects of the business case are subject to continuing work and will be further developed in the Outline Business Case anticipated in summer 2005. This will be followed by a Formal Business Case in 2006 prior to financial commitment, all subject to the Bill receiving Royal Assent. tie limited 2 Edinburgh Tram Line Two - 2004 Preliminary Financial Case - Update September 2004 1 Executive Summary 8 1.1 Introduction 8 1.2 Risks 10 1.3 Key Procurement Issues 10 1.4 Programme risk 11 1.5 Service integration 12 1.6 Results of Financial Model 12 2 Introduction and Background 16 2.1 Introduction 16 2.2 Description of tie/City of Edinburgh Council Relationship 16 2.3 Outline of Previous Work 16 2.4 Description of Project Development 17 2.5 Summary of tie Advisors roles and functions and Working Groups 18 2.6 Summary 19 3 The Need for Tram 20 3.1 Tram in Edinburgh 20 3.2 The Justification for Tram: The Structure Plan 28 3.3 Overall Policy Context 29 3.4 Specific Tram Benefits 33 3.5 West Edinburgh 36 3.6 Why not other public transport modes instead of tram? 38 3.7 Conclusions 40 4 Summary of STAG Appraisal 42 tie limited 3 Edinburgh Tram Line Two - 2004 Preliminary Financial Case - Update September 2004 4.1 Introduction 42 4.2 STAG 2 -
Platform for Success: Final Report of the Scottish Broadcasting Commission
PLATFORM FOR SUCCESS Final report of the Scottish Broadcasting Commission PLATFORM FOR SUCCESS Final report of the Scottish Broadcasting Commission © Crown copyright 2008 ISBN: 978-0-7559-5845-0 The Scottish Government St Andrew’s House Edinburgh EH1 3DG Produced for the Scottish Broadcasting Commission by RR Donnelley B57086 Published by the Scottish Government, September, 2008 Further copies are available from Blackwell's Bookshop 53 South Bridge Edinburgh EH1 1YS Scottish Broadcasting Commission : 01 CONTENTS Foreword 2 Executive Summary 3 Chapter 1 Introduction 13 Chapter 2 Our Vision for Scottish Broadcasting 15 Chapter 3 Serving Audiences and Society 19 Chapter 4 A Network for Scotland 32 Chapter 5 Broadcasting and the Creative Economy 39 Chapter 6 Delivering the Future 51 Annex 56 02 : Scottish Broadcasting Commission FOREWORD In its short existence, the Scottish Broadcasting Commission has triggered a wide-ranging and frequently passionate debate about the future of the industry and the services it provides to audiences in Scotland. We intended from the beginning to make an impact which would lead to action, and there have been some encouraging early results in the form of new commitments from the broadcasters. But this is only a start. In publishing our final report and recommendations, we hope and expect that the debate will become even more visible and audible – with particular focus on the key opportunities and challenges we have identified in broadcasting and the new digital platforms. What has been refreshing is the extent to which both the industry and its audiences are at least as excited about the future as they are critical of some of the weaknesses of the past and present. -
Annual Report on the BBC 2019/20
Ofcom’s Annual Report on the BBC 2019/20 Published 25 November 2020 Raising awarenessWelsh translation available: Adroddiad Blynyddol Ofcom ar y BBC of online harms Contents Overview .................................................................................................................................... 2 The ongoing impact of Covid-19 ............................................................................................... 6 Looking ahead .......................................................................................................................... 11 Performance assessment ......................................................................................................... 16 Public Purpose 1: News and current affairs ........................................................................ 24 Public Purpose 2: Supporting learning for people of all ages ............................................ 37 Public Purpose 3: Creative, high quality and distinctive output and services .................... 47 Public Purpose 4: Reflecting, representing and serving the UK’s diverse communities .... 60 The BBC’s impact on competition ............................................................................................ 83 The BBC’s content standards ................................................................................................... 89 Overview of our duties ............................................................................................................ 96 1 Overview This is our third -
Fraser of Allander Institute (2015) Fraser of Allander Institute : Economic Commentary [June 2015]
Fraser of Allander Institute (2015) Fraser of Allander Institute : Economic Commentary [June 2015]. [Report] , This version is available at https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/62036/ Strathprints is designed to allow users to access the research output of the University of Strathclyde. Unless otherwise explicitly stated on the manuscript, Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any profitmaking activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute both the url (https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/) and the content of this paper for research or private study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the Strathprints administrator: [email protected] The Strathprints institutional repository (https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk) is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs. It has been developed to disseminate open access research outputs, expose data about those outputs, and enable the management and persistent access to Strathclyde's intellectual output. Fraser of Allander Institute Economic Commentary Vol 39 No. 1 In association with The Scottish economy Fraser of Outlook and appraisal .................................................................... 3 Allander Forecasts of -
Scotland in the European Union Table of Contents
Scotland in the European Union Table of Contents Contents i Foreword by the Deputy First Minister ii Executive Summary iv 1 Introduction 1 2 Why EU membership matters 5 3 The road to independent membership 11 4 Giving Scotland a positive voice in Europe 14 5 Promoting priorities and engaging partnership 18 6 Contributing to the EU reform agenda 22 7 Conclusion 27 ANNEX 1: The Scottish Government‟s economic strategy and the Europe 2020 agenda 28 ANNEX 2: Why Scotland, a wealthy and productive country, can be influential in EU decision making 39 ANNEX 3: The economics of European Union membership 53 ANNEX 4: Why the alternatives to membership are not attractive 69 ANNEX 5: Scotland‟s transition to EU membership 80 ANNEX 6: An independent Scotland and the Euro 90 ANNEX 7: Schengen and the Common Travel Area 96 Glossary 101 i Foreword by the Deputy First Minister On 18 September 2014 the people of Scotland will have the opportunity to decide if Scotland‟s future should be as an independent country, taking its own decisions on domestic, European and international affairs in its own Parliament, based on the aspirations of its own people. The alternative is to remain part of a Westminster system of government that has repeatedly failed to deliver for Scotland. If the people of Scotland do vote for independence in next year‟s referendum, one of the main benefits will be that Scotland will be able to take its place as an independent Member State within the European Union (EU). As such, the Government of Scotland will join the other 28 sovereign governments who collectively decide the scope and content of the various laws and policies that fall within the remit of the EU level of governance. -
Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward', Architectural Heritage, Vol
Edinburgh Research Explorer A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward Citation for published version: Lowrey, J 2012, 'A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward', Architectural Heritage, vol. 23, pp. 57-74. https://doi.org/10.3366/arch.2012.0033 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3366/arch.2012.0033 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Architectural Heritage Publisher Rights Statement: © The Architectural Heritage Society. Lowrey, J. (2013). A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward. Architectural Heritage General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 John Lowrey A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward This paper considers the main characteristics of the Scottish formal landscape, as established by Sir William Bruce. -
Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
Wednesday Volume 558 13 February 2013 No. 116 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 13 February 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 839 13 FEBRUARY 2013 840 Mr Mike Weir (Angus) (SNP): Why are this Government House of Commons determined to throw money at an industry that has never been economically viable, while refusing to set a Wednesday 13 February 2013 decarbonisation target to boost the renewables industry, which is already creating thousands of new jobs in Scotland? The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Michael Moore: Through energy market reform, we are underpinning the renewables sector for a very long PRAYERS time to come. What I do not understand is how the Scottish National party can propose independence, when Scottish Renewables would end up losing the biggest [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] source of consumers who underpin the economics of that very important sector. Oral Answers to Questions Under-occupancy Penalty 2. Dr Eilidh Whiteford (Banff and Buchan) (SNP): What estimate he has made of the number of SCOTLAND households in Scotland affected by the under- occupancy penalty. [142161] The Secretary of State was asked— The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Scotland (David Mundell): In its impact assessment, published on Nuclear Power 28 June 2012, the Department for Work and Pensions estimates that 80,000 claimants of housing benefit in 1. Alun Cairns (Vale of Glamorgan) (Con): What the social rented sector in Scotland will be affected by recent assessment he has made of the contribution of the under-occupation measure. -
ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email [email protected] Response
Customer Ref: 01234 Response Ref: ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email [email protected] Response Type Developer / Landowner On behalf of: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Choice 1 A We want to connect our places, parks and green spaces together as part of a city-wide, regional, and national green network. We want new development to connect to, and deliver this network. Do you agree with this? - Select support / don't support Short Response Not Answered Explanation Choice 1 B We want to change our policy to require all development (including change of use) to include green and blue infrastructure. Do you agree with this? - Support / Object Short Response No Explanation The DIO is concerned about the requirement for changes of use to incorporate new blue and green infrastructure. As the Council will be aware, the Redford Barracks site incorporates a number of listed buildings that may be retained and converted to residential accommodation as part of a wider scheme to redevelop the site. It would be challenging to retro-fit new blue/green infrastructure for these buildings and in terms of drainage it would be much less invasive to continue to rely upon existing systems. This policy would also be incompatible with the conversion of buildings with constrained curtilages which have little or no space to install features like swales or rain gardens. These issues will be further compounded for buildings that are listed or within conservation areas where the retro-fitting of blue/green infrastructure on the building itself, such as a green roof, would not be feasible or indeed desirable from a built heritage perspective. -
Business R&D in Scotland – a Missing Link
Business R&D in Scotland – A Missing Link SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING DELIVERING THE FUTURE AUGUST 2009 Business R&D in Scotland – A Missing Link © Crown copyright 2009 ISBN 978-0-7559-5922-8 Produced for the Scottish Science Advisory Council by RR Donnelley B58266 08/09 Published by the Scottish Science Advisory Council, August 2009 We gratefully acknowledge the contributions and inputs of former SSAC members, Professors Wilson Sibbett, Peter Grant, Geoffrey Boulton and Dr John Nicholls. scottish science advisory council Business R&D in Scotland – A Missing Link The Scottish Science Advisory Council The Scottish Science Advisory Council (SSAC) is Scotland’s highest level advisory body for science, engineering and technology. The SSAC is an independent advisory body providing advice and recommendations on science strategy, policy and priorities to the Scottish Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser (CSA). It is a broadly-based group, including both practitioners and users of scientific innovation. Terms of Reference The terms of reference for the Scottish Science Advisory Council are to: • Advise the Scottish Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser on a broad range of scientific issues and science-related policies that will grow our economy and raise our quality of life and will further enhance Scotland as a science nation. The SSAC will provide advice to the CSA on science strategy, policy and priorities to allow the Scottish Government to make effective use of available scientific advice, knowledge and techniques in formulating and implementing policies to support the full range of its objectives. The SSAC will take a medium- to long-term, horizon-scanning, strategic view in formulating its advice. -
Media Nations 2020: Scotland Report
Media Nations 2020 Scotland report Published 5 August 2020 Contents Section Overview............................................................................................................ 3 The impact of Covid-19 on audiences and broadcasters .................................... 5 TV services and devices.................................................................................... 12 Broadcast TV viewing ....................................................................................... 16 TV programming for and from Scotland ........................................................... 26 Radio and audio ............................................................................................... 34 2 Overview This Media Nations: Scotland report reviews key trends in the television and audio-visual sector as well as in the radio and audio industry in Scotland. The majority of the research relates to 2019 and early 2020 but, given the extraordinary events that surround the Covid-19 pandemic, Ofcom has undertaken research into how our viewing and news consumption habits have changed during this period. This is explored in the Impact of Covid-19 on audiences and broadcasters section. The report provides updates on several datasets, including bespoke data collected directly from licensed television and radio broadcasters (for output, spend and revenue in 2019), Ofcom’s proprietary consumer research (for audience opinions), and BARB and RAJAR (for audience consumption). In addition to this Scotland report, there are separate -
The Economic Impacts of Wind Farms on Scottish Tourism
The economic impacts of wind farms on Scottish tourism A report for the Scottish Government March 2008 The economic impact of Wind farms on Scottish tourism 2 Executive summary 1. Background and Approach Over the last two decades Energy Policy has seen a marked shift towards renewables as part of the UK commitment to reduce green house gas emissions by 20% between 2000 and 2010. The policy was reinforced in November 2007 with a new target of 50 per cent of Scotland's electricity from renewables by 2020, and an interim milestone of 31 per cent by 2011. The 2011 target implies around 5,000 Megawatts of installed capacity almost double current levels. Given current technology and the time needed to plan and develop large projects such as storage hydro or offshore wind farms, the policy suggests a very significant increase in on-shore wind farms with associated impacts on Scotland’s landscape. Scottish tourism depends heavily on the country's landscape, with 92% of visitors stating that scenery was important in their choice of Scotland as a holiday destination, the natural environment being important to 89% of visitors (Tourism Attitudes Survey 2005). As part of the general policy to create a more successful country, with increasing sustainable economic growth, the Tourism sector has agreed a target of 50% revenue growth in the ten years to 2015 The potential problem is that many people find that man made structures such as pylons and wind turbines reduce the attractiveness of a landscape. It is logical to assume that reduced quality of an important feature could reduce demand to some degree which in turn may result in either reduced prices for tourism services or reduced numbers of tourists or both.