DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Wednesday Volume 558 13 February 2013 No. 116 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 13 February 2013 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2013 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 839 13 FEBRUARY 2013 840 Mr Mike Weir (Angus) (SNP): Why are this Government House of Commons determined to throw money at an industry that has never been economically viable, while refusing to set a Wednesday 13 February 2013 decarbonisation target to boost the renewables industry, which is already creating thousands of new jobs in Scotland? The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock Michael Moore: Through energy market reform, we are underpinning the renewables sector for a very long PRAYERS time to come. What I do not understand is how the Scottish National party can propose independence, when Scottish Renewables would end up losing the biggest [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] source of consumers who underpin the economics of that very important sector. Oral Answers to Questions Under-occupancy Penalty 2. Dr Eilidh Whiteford (Banff and Buchan) (SNP): What estimate he has made of the number of SCOTLAND households in Scotland affected by the under- occupancy penalty. [142161] The Secretary of State was asked— The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Scotland (David Mundell): In its impact assessment, published on Nuclear Power 28 June 2012, the Department for Work and Pensions estimates that 80,000 claimants of housing benefit in 1. Alun Cairns (Vale of Glamorgan) (Con): What the social rented sector in Scotland will be affected by recent assessment he has made of the contribution of the under-occupation measure. the nuclear power industry to the Scottish economy. [142160] Dr Whiteford: The Minister knows as well as I do that thousands of people in low-income households in Scotland The Secretary of State for Scotland (Michael Moore): who are going to lose out because of the bedroom tax There is currently just over 2 GW of installed and have no realistic prospect of moving to a smaller house. operational nuclear capacity in Scotland, split between According to that impact assessment, claimants in Scotland Torness and Hunterston B. In 2011, 33% of electricity will be disproportionately hit because of the mismatch generated in Scotland came from these two nuclear between the available housing stock and the needs of power stations. tenants, so will the right hon. Gentleman take this Alun Cairns: Is the Secretary of State aware that opportunity to distance himself from the shameful attempt Wylfa and Anglesey are about to benefit from a massive of this Government to stigmatise and penalise people investment in a new nuclear power station? Does he who live in council houses and need help with their share my disappointment in the attitude shown by the rent? Scottish Government, who reject any new nuclear investment? David Mundell: What is shameful is the way that the Scottish National party plays party politics with vulnerable Michael Moore: Clearly, there is a significant contribution people, pretending that there can be no welfare changes, to our current energy mix from nuclear. My hon. Friend yet putting forward nothing in their place and not will be aware that planning on these matters is devolved indicating how welfare would be paid for in an independent to Scotland. It is a matter, rightly, for the Scottish Scotland. Parliament to determine. For my part, I am delighted that we are seeing an increase in the proportion of 12. [142171] Graeme Morrice (Livingston) (Lab): The renewables in our energy mix as part of a sustainable, bedroom tax and other changes to housing benefit affordable energy supply in the UK. mean that millions of pounds will be removed from the Scottish economy and hundreds of jobs will be lost Fiona O’Donnell (East Lothian) (Lab): EDF Group’s across the country, according to the Fraser of Allander nuclear power stations, including Torness in my Institute. Can the Minister tell the House what constituency, produced their highest output for seven discussions he has had with the Chancellor about how years in 2012. Does the Secretary of State agree that to mitigate these losses to the Scottish economy? there is a continuing long-term role for nuclear in keeping the lights on in Scotland? David Mundell: The hon. Gentleman and his colleagues fail ever to mention the discretionary housing payments Michael Moore: I do not think that anybody can fund, which will support people in difficult situations. ignore the significant contribution that nuclear makes. He and his colleagues should be urging councils in Like the hon. Lady, I have many constituents who are Scotland to make use of that money. Scotland will get a employed at Torness. Nuclear power stations play an very good share of the £155 million being provided. important role in our local economies, but I want to see a sustainable mix across the energy supplies and generation Mr Brian H. Donohoe (Central Ayrshire) (Lab): Does sector, and with renewables and others in the mix, that the Minister not recognise the fact that there are people is a good thing too. crying as a result of being given notices right now that 841 Oral Answers13 FEBRUARY 2013 Oral Answers 842 tell them that they will have to get out of their house, or David Mundell: What this Government are doing is lose housing benefit as a result, come 1 April? That is engaging with the Scottish Government in a discussion, the reality of the situation. Can the Minister not waken and at the moment we are waiting to hear from them. up to that fact? Sir Alan Beith (Berwick-upon-Tweed) (LD): Does my David Mundell: I am surprised that the hon. Gentleman right hon. Friend recognise the importance to transport and others are not working with their local councils and links of dualling the A1, and will he continue to press housing associations to draw attention to the availability the case with Scottish Ministers and colleagues in the of the discretionary payments funds and the fact that UK Government? there will be an opportunity to support the most vulnerable. Mr William Bain (Glasgow North East) (Lab): As David Mundell: I welcome the Chancellor’s well as the bedroom tax, the Government are preparing announcement that the A1 will become a motorway to to tighten further the worst squeeze on ordinary people’s Newcastle. He made it clear, I think in response to my living standards in decades by cutting most benefits and right hon. Friend, that the Department for Transport tax credits by 4% in real terms over the next three years would look at the case for dualling the A1 to the in plans that hurt the poorest 40% in Scotland three and Scottish border. a half times harder than the wealthiest. Does the Minister not accept that, with 800,000 working-age couples and Mr Russell Brown (Dumfries and Galloway) (Lab): single people in Scotland losing up to £5 a week, those As chair of the all-party west coast main line group, I cuts are not just socially brutal, but disastrous for the wrote to a Scottish Government Minister to ask what Scottish economy? they were prepared to do with regard to investment for the HS2 route starting from the north. Is it not irresponsible David Mundell: What I accept is that the Labour that the Scottish Government will not answer that party put this country into the financial circumstances question on HS2, even though two city councils— we found after the 2010 election. It says it wanted to Edinburgh and Glasgow—will discuss it? reform welfare. It is quite happy to criticise individual measures, but it comes up with no proposals at all on David Mundell: I am disappointed that the hon. how to fund them and puts forward no alternative Gentleman, particularly in his capacity as chair of the proposals. all-party west coast main line group, has not had a response from the Scottish Government. As I indicated Transport Links in my earlier answer, the UK Government are waiting for a response from the Scottish Government. We have 3. Fiona Bruce (Congleton) (Con): What steps he is made it absolutely clear that we want to work with them taking to improve transport links between Scotland to ensure that the people of Scotland and the United and England. [142162] Kingdom benefit from HS2. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Scotland Mrs Cheryl Gillan (Chesham and Amersham) (Con): (David Mundell): I welcome the recent announcement I agree with earlier questioners and the Minister that by my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for HS2, if it is to go ahead, will be exceedingly important Transport on the planned extension of HS2 to Manchester to both the north of England and transport links between and Leeds. Journey times between Scotland and London Scotland and England. Can I therefore have his assurance will be significantly reduced as a result. that he and his right hon. Friend the Secretary of State will argue formidably for that in Cabinet and encourage Fiona Bruce: Does the Minister agree that there is a the Government to start HS2, if it goes ahead, in the strange irony in the fact that HS2 will bring our two north? nations closer together yet the Scottish Government are intent on driving a wedge between them and pushing David Mundell: I appreciate my right hon. Friend’s them further apart? question. As always, she has taken a keen interest in Scotland, but she knows as well as I do that the David Mundell: My hon.
Recommended publications
  • Poor Relief and the Church in Scotland, 1560−1650

    Poor Relief and the Church in Scotland, 1560−1650

    George Mackay Brown and the Scottish Catholic Imagination Scottish Religious Cultures Historical Perspectives An innovative study of George Mackay Brown as a Scottish Catholic writer with a truly international reach This lively new study is the very first book to offer an absorbing history of the uncharted territory that is Scottish Catholic fiction. For Scottish Catholic writers of the twentieth century, faith was the key influence on both their artistic process and creative vision. By focusing on one of the best known of Scotland’s literary converts, George Mackay Brown, this book explores both the Scottish Catholic modernist movement of the twentieth century and the particularities of Brown’s writing which have been routinely overlooked by previous studies. The book provides sustained and illuminating close readings of key texts in Brown’s corpus and includes detailed comparisons between Brown’s writing and an established canon of Catholic writers, including Graham Greene, Muriel Spark and Flannery O’Connor. This timely book reveals that Brown’s Catholic imagination extended far beyond the ‘small green world’ of Orkney and ultimately embraced a universal human experience. Linden Bicket is a Teaching Fellow in the School of Divinity in New College, at the University of Edinburgh. She has published widely on George Mackay Brown Linden Bicket and her research focuses on patterns of faith and scepticism in the fictive worlds of story, film and theatre. Poor Relief and the Cover image: George Mackay Brown (left of crucifix) at the Italian Church in Scotland, Chapel, Orkney © Orkney Library & Archive Cover design: www.hayesdesign.co.uk 1560−1650 ISBN 978-1-4744-1165-3 edinburghuniversitypress.com John McCallum POOR RELIEF AND THE CHURCH IN SCOTLAND, 1560–1650 Scottish Religious Cultures Historical Perspectives Series Editors: Scott R.
  • Tie Line 2 Business Case Final

    Tie Line 2 Business Case Final

    Document Status This document has been prepared at the request of the Private Bills Unit to provide the Committee of MSPs considering the Bill for Tram Line Two with an updated position relative to the equivalent version submitted in December 2003. This document should be regarded as a working draft as significant aspects of the business case are subject to continuing work and will be further developed in the Outline Business Case anticipated in summer 2005. This will be followed by a Formal Business Case in 2006 prior to financial commitment, all subject to the Bill receiving Royal Assent. tie limited 2 Edinburgh Tram Line Two - 2004 Preliminary Financial Case - Update September 2004 1 Executive Summary 8 1.1 Introduction 8 1.2 Risks 10 1.3 Key Procurement Issues 10 1.4 Programme risk 11 1.5 Service integration 12 1.6 Results of Financial Model 12 2 Introduction and Background 16 2.1 Introduction 16 2.2 Description of tie/City of Edinburgh Council Relationship 16 2.3 Outline of Previous Work 16 2.4 Description of Project Development 17 2.5 Summary of tie Advisors roles and functions and Working Groups 18 2.6 Summary 19 3 The Need for Tram 20 3.1 Tram in Edinburgh 20 3.2 The Justification for Tram: The Structure Plan 28 3.3 Overall Policy Context 29 3.4 Specific Tram Benefits 33 3.5 West Edinburgh 36 3.6 Why not other public transport modes instead of tram? 38 3.7 Conclusions 40 4 Summary of STAG Appraisal 42 tie limited 3 Edinburgh Tram Line Two - 2004 Preliminary Financial Case - Update September 2004 4.1 Introduction 42 4.2 STAG 2
  • Fraser of Allander Institute (2015) Fraser of Allander Institute : Economic Commentary [June 2015]

    Fraser of Allander Institute (2015) Fraser of Allander Institute : Economic Commentary [June 2015]

    Fraser of Allander Institute (2015) Fraser of Allander Institute : Economic Commentary [June 2015]. [Report] , This version is available at https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/62036/ Strathprints is designed to allow users to access the research output of the University of Strathclyde. Unless otherwise explicitly stated on the manuscript, Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any profitmaking activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute both the url (https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/) and the content of this paper for research or private study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Any correspondence concerning this service should be sent to the Strathprints administrator: [email protected] The Strathprints institutional repository (https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk) is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs. It has been developed to disseminate open access research outputs, expose data about those outputs, and enable the management and persistent access to Strathclyde's intellectual output. Fraser of Allander Institute Economic Commentary Vol 39 No. 1 In association with The Scottish economy Fraser of Outlook and appraisal .................................................................... 3 Allander Forecasts of
  • Ministerial Departments CABINET OFFICE July 2015

    Ministerial Departments CABINET OFFICE July 2015

    LIST OF MINISTERIAL RESPONSIBILITIES Including Executive Agencies and Non- Ministerial Departments CABINET OFFICE July 2015 LIST OF MINISTERIAL RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDING EXECUTIVE AGENCIES AND NON MINISTERIAL DEPARTMENTS CONTENTS Page Part I List of Cabinet Ministers 2 Part II Alphabetical List of Ministers 4 Part III Ministerial Departments and Responsibilities 8 Part IV Executive Agencies 64 Part V Non-Ministerial Departments 76 Part VI Government Whips in the House of Commons and House of Lords 84 Part VII Government Spokespersons in the House of Lords 85 Part VIII Index 87 Information contained in this document can also be found at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-ministers-and-responsibilities Further copies of this document can be obtained from: Cabinet Office Room 208 70 Whitehall London SW1A 2AS Or send your request via email to: [email protected] 1 I - LIST OF CABINET MINISTERS The Rt Hon David Cameron MP Prime Minister, First Lord of the Treasury and Minister for the Civil Service The Rt Hon George Osborne MP First Secretary of State and Chancellor of the Exchequer The Rt Hon Theresa May MP Secretary of State for the Home Department The Rt Hon Philip Hammond MP Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs The Rt Hon Michael Gove MP Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Justice The Rt Hon Michael Fallon MP Secretary of State for Defence The Rt Hon Iain Duncan Smith MP Secretary of State for Work and Pensions The Rt Hon Jeremy Hunt MP Secretary of State for Health The
  • Scotland in the European Union Table of Contents

    Scotland in the European Union Table of Contents

    Scotland in the European Union Table of Contents Contents i Foreword by the Deputy First Minister ii Executive Summary iv 1 Introduction 1 2 Why EU membership matters 5 3 The road to independent membership 11 4 Giving Scotland a positive voice in Europe 14 5 Promoting priorities and engaging partnership 18 6 Contributing to the EU reform agenda 22 7 Conclusion 27 ANNEX 1: The Scottish Government‟s economic strategy and the Europe 2020 agenda 28 ANNEX 2: Why Scotland, a wealthy and productive country, can be influential in EU decision making 39 ANNEX 3: The economics of European Union membership 53 ANNEX 4: Why the alternatives to membership are not attractive 69 ANNEX 5: Scotland‟s transition to EU membership 80 ANNEX 6: An independent Scotland and the Euro 90 ANNEX 7: Schengen and the Common Travel Area 96 Glossary 101 i Foreword by the Deputy First Minister On 18 September 2014 the people of Scotland will have the opportunity to decide if Scotland‟s future should be as an independent country, taking its own decisions on domestic, European and international affairs in its own Parliament, based on the aspirations of its own people. The alternative is to remain part of a Westminster system of government that has repeatedly failed to deliver for Scotland. If the people of Scotland do vote for independence in next year‟s referendum, one of the main benefits will be that Scotland will be able to take its place as an independent Member State within the European Union (EU). As such, the Government of Scotland will join the other 28 sovereign governments who collectively decide the scope and content of the various laws and policies that fall within the remit of the EU level of governance.
  • Business R&D in Scotland – a Missing Link

    Business R&D in Scotland – a Missing Link

    Business R&D in Scotland – A Missing Link SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING DELIVERING THE FUTURE AUGUST 2009 Business R&D in Scotland – A Missing Link © Crown copyright 2009 ISBN 978-0-7559-5922-8 Produced for the Scottish Science Advisory Council by RR Donnelley B58266 08/09 Published by the Scottish Science Advisory Council, August 2009 We gratefully acknowledge the contributions and inputs of former SSAC members, Professors Wilson Sibbett, Peter Grant, Geoffrey Boulton and Dr John Nicholls. scottish science advisory council Business R&D in Scotland – A Missing Link The Scottish Science Advisory Council The Scottish Science Advisory Council (SSAC) is Scotland’s highest level advisory body for science, engineering and technology. The SSAC is an independent advisory body providing advice and recommendations on science strategy, policy and priorities to the Scottish Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser (CSA). It is a broadly-based group, including both practitioners and users of scientific innovation. Terms of Reference The terms of reference for the Scottish Science Advisory Council are to: • Advise the Scottish Government’s Chief Scientific Adviser on a broad range of scientific issues and science-related policies that will grow our economy and raise our quality of life and will further enhance Scotland as a science nation. The SSAC will provide advice to the CSA on science strategy, policy and priorities to allow the Scottish Government to make effective use of available scientific advice, knowledge and techniques in formulating and implementing policies to support the full range of its objectives. The SSAC will take a medium- to long-term, horizon-scanning, strategic view in formulating its advice.
  • List of Ministers' Interests

    List of Ministers' Interests

    LIST OF MINISTERS’ INTERESTS CABINET OFFICE DECEMBER 2015 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Prime Minister 3 Attorney General’s Office 5 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 6 Cabinet Office 8 Department for Communities and Local Government 10 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 12 Ministry of Defence 14 Department for Education 16 Department of Energy and Climate Change 18 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 19 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 20 Department of Health 22 Home Office 24 Department for International Development 26 Ministry of Justice 27 Northern Ireland Office 30 Office of the Advocate General for Scotland 31 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 32 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 33 Scotland Office 34 Department for Transport 35 HM Treasury 37 Wales Office 39 Department for Work and Pensions 40 Government Whips – Commons 42 Government Whips – Lords 46 INTRODUCTION Ministerial Code Under the terms of the Ministerial Code, Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their Ministerial position and their private interests, financial or otherwise. On appointment to each new office, Ministers must provide their Permanent Secretary with a list in writing of all relevant interests known to them which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. Individual declarations, and a note of any action taken in respect of individual interests, are then passed to the Cabinet Office Propriety and Ethics team and the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests to confirm they are content with the action taken or to provide further advice as appropriate.
  • The Economic Impacts of Wind Farms on Scottish Tourism

    The Economic Impacts of Wind Farms on Scottish Tourism

    The economic impacts of wind farms on Scottish tourism A report for the Scottish Government March 2008 The economic impact of Wind farms on Scottish tourism 2 Executive summary 1. Background and Approach Over the last two decades Energy Policy has seen a marked shift towards renewables as part of the UK commitment to reduce green house gas emissions by 20% between 2000 and 2010. The policy was reinforced in November 2007 with a new target of 50 per cent of Scotland's electricity from renewables by 2020, and an interim milestone of 31 per cent by 2011. The 2011 target implies around 5,000 Megawatts of installed capacity almost double current levels. Given current technology and the time needed to plan and develop large projects such as storage hydro or offshore wind farms, the policy suggests a very significant increase in on-shore wind farms with associated impacts on Scotland’s landscape. Scottish tourism depends heavily on the country's landscape, with 92% of visitors stating that scenery was important in their choice of Scotland as a holiday destination, the natural environment being important to 89% of visitors (Tourism Attitudes Survey 2005). As part of the general policy to create a more successful country, with increasing sustainable economic growth, the Tourism sector has agreed a target of 50% revenue growth in the ten years to 2015 The potential problem is that many people find that man made structures such as pylons and wind turbines reduce the attractiveness of a landscape. It is logical to assume that reduced quality of an important feature could reduce demand to some degree which in turn may result in either reduced prices for tourism services or reduced numbers of tourists or both.
  • The Impacts of the Railways in Scotland

    The Impacts of the Railways in Scotland

    Rollins College Rollins Scholarship Online Master of Liberal Studies Theses Spring 2014 The mpI acts of the Railways in Scotland Isabella Katherine Stryker Rollins College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.rollins.edu/mls Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Stryker, Isabella Katherine, "The mpI acts of the Railways in Scotland" (2014). Master of Liberal Studies Theses. 52. http://scholarship.rollins.edu/mls/52 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Rollins Scholarship Online. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master of Liberal Studies Theses by an authorized administrator of Rollins Scholarship Online. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Impacts of the Railways in Scotland A Comparison of Glasgow and Edinburgh by Isabella Katherine Stryker May, 2014 Mentor: Dr. Paul Reich Reader: Dr. Patricia Lancaster Rollins College Hamilton Holt Master of Liberal Studies Program Winter Park, Florida 1 Table of Contents Introduction 2 Chapter I: Glasgow Railway History 17 Chapter II: Glasgow Cultural Impacts and My Experiences 29 Chapter III: Edinburgh Railway History 39 Chapter IV: Edinburgh Cultural Impacts and My Experiences 48 Conclusion 59 Bibliography 64 Appendix A: December Trip Journal 2011- Field Notes 68 Appendix B: May Trip Journal 2012- Field Notes 79 2 Introduction Throughout history, transportation aids in the growth and development of a city. From the Romans and their vast, complex roadways to the labyrinths of subways in New York City, transportation not only molds a city, it gives it its heartbeat. However, some areas in the world become over-dependent on their transportation.
  • Future Intelligent Transport System (ITS) Strategy

    Future Intelligent Transport System (ITS) Strategy

    transport.gov.scot Scotland’s Trunk Road and Motorway Network Future Intelligent Transport Systems Strategy 2017 Future Intelligent Transport Systems Strategy Transport Scotland CONTENTS Ministerial Forward ii Executive Summary iii Glossary viii Abbreviations x 1 Introduction 1 2 Core aim and structure of the strategy 5 3 An objective led strategy to meet the needs of our customers 11 4 The challenges ahead 17 5 Scotland’s strategic priorities 25 6 Monitoring, controlling and informing Scotland’s trunk roads 34 7 Our six strategic themes 41 8 Implementation and delivery 72 Appendix Sources of further information 76 i Future Intelligent Transport Systems Strategy Transport Scotland Ministerial Foreword Scotland has been at the forefront of the use of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) and related services as they have developed over the last 30 years. Our Traffic Scotland service contributes positively to the safe and efficient movement of people, goods and services across the country and supports key industries such as tourism and the food and drink sector. The Scottish Government has clear priorities for the sustainable growth of the country’s economy. Transport, the environment and the digital sector feature highly in the strategies for meeting these goals. ITS cut across all three and I am pleased to see Transport Scotland setting out its thinking in this Future ITS Strategy. The ITS Strategy is being developed to put the needs of our customers at the heart of what we do. This customer focus will be paramount in helping us to take strategic decisions on where to prioritise resources, what systems and services we need to provide, maintain and develop, what new technologies and innovations we need to invest in and develop, and tell us when it is right to move away from existing or obsolete ITS infrastructure and services ITS is a rapidly evolving field, with developments taking place in a wide range of areas, not least in communication of information to travellers via mobile devices, both at trip planning stage and during the journey itself.
  • Tourism Recovery Recommendations

    Tourism Recovery Recommendations

    TOURISM RECOVERY RECOMMENDATIONS A REPORT BY THE SCOTTISH TOURISM RECOVERY TASK FORCE TOURISM RECOVERY RECOMMENDATIONS | 2 CONTENTS PURPOSE 3 FOREWORD 4 THE SCOTTISH TOURISM RECOVERY TASK FORCE 6 STRT MEMBERSHIP 9 OVERVIEW 10 IMMEDIATE ACTIONS 11 TOURISM IN SCOTLAND 12 THE COVID-19 IMPACT 12 SECTOR IMPACT 14 IMMEDIATE BUSINESS OUTLOOK 16 CHALLENGES AFFECTING TOURISM RECOVERY 16 PLANS FOR RECOVERY 16 A COMMON PURPOSE AND FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION 17 PRIORITISED ACTIONS 18 OUTCOME 1 18 OUTCOME 2 20 OUTCOME 3 24 OUTCOME 4 25 A NEW SECTOR INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP 28 NEXT STEPS 30 APPENDIX 32 3 | TOURISM RECOVERY RECOMMENDATIONS PURPOSE To provide recommendations for Scottish Ministers and the UK Government on the essential actions to support tourism and hospitality recovery in Scotland. TOURISM RECOVERY RECOMMENDATIONS | 4 FOREWORD The COVID-19 pandemic is presenting an For that reason, we set up the Scottish unprecedented challenge for Scotland’s health Tourism Recovery Task Force in June. The Task and wellbeing and its economy, the scale of Force’s remit was to advise on recovery plans, which most of us have not seen in our lifetime. and to deliver a set of recommendations At the forefront of this is our tourism and for Government, both in Scotland and hospitality industry. Westminster, to consider – recommendations which not only look at the immediate effects Back in March, when we launched the new of Covid on the industry but which also national tourism strategy, Scotland Outlook deliver on the key themes of the new tourism 2030, with its fresh and collaborative approach strategy around sustainable businesses, the to responsible and sustainable tourism which importance of people and communities, and benefited communities and visitors alike, our green tourism.
  • Scotland's Future

    Scotland's Future

    Scotland’s Future is in your hands. YOUR GUIDE T O A N Scotland’s Future is a comprehensive INDEPENDENT guide to an independent Scotland and SCOTLAND what it means for you. Scotland’s Future answers your questions about independence and sets out the facts and figures on: • How Scotland can afford to become independent. • Scotland’s economic strengths and how we can make the most of our potential. • How independence will help ensure that everyone in Scotland gets a fair deal. • The ways in which independence will strengthen Scotland’s democracy. • An independent Scotland’s place in the world. • Other issues important to you scotreferendum.com Scan here for videos related to Scotland’s Future. © Crown copyright 2013 ISBN: 978-1-78412-068-9 APS Group Scotland DPPAS20160 (11/13) SCOTREFERENDUM.COM 298070_Cover_38mm spine.indd 1 19/11/2013 17:18 © Crown copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. The statistics in this document are up to date at the time of going to print. This document is available from our website at SCOTREFERENDUM.COM Scan here for videos related to Scotland’s Future. First published by the Scottish Government, November 2013 ISBN: 978-1-78412-068-9 ISBN: 978-1-78412-070-2 (epub) ISBN: 978-1-78412-071-9 (mobi) The Scottish Government St Andrew’s House Edinburgh EH1 3DG Produced for the Scottish Government by APS Group Scotland DPPAS20160 (11/13) Published by the Scottish Government, November 2013 298070_Cover_38mm spine.indd 2 19/11/2013 17:18 SCOTLANDʼS YOUR GUIDE TO AN FUTURE INDEPENDENT SCOTLAND Scotland’s referendum on 18 September 2014 is a choice between two futures.