DOCSLIB.ORG

ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email [email protected] Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email Nicolas.Lopez100@Mod.Gov.Uk Response Customer Ref: 01234 Response Ref: ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email [email protected] Response Type Developer / Landowner On behalf of: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Choice 1 A We want to connect our places, parks and green spaces together as part of a city-wide, regional, and national green network. We want new development to connect to, and deliver this network. Do you agree with this? - Select support / don't support Short Response Not Answered Explanation Choice 1 B We want to change our policy to require all development (including change of use) to include green and blue infrastructure. Do you agree with this? - Support / Object Short Response No Explanation The DIO is concerned about the requirement for changes of use to incorporate new blue and green infrastructure. As the Council will be aware, the Redford Barracks site incorporates a number of listed buildings that may be retained and converted to residential accommodation as part of a wider scheme to redevelop the site. It would be challenging to retro-fit new blue/green infrastructure for these buildings and in terms of drainage it would be much less invasive to continue to rely upon existing systems. This policy would also be incompatible with the conversion of buildings with constrained curtilages which have little or no space to install features like swales or rain gardens. These issues will be further compounded for buildings that are listed or within conservation areas where the retro-fitting of blue/green infrastructure on the building itself, such as a green roof, would not be feasible or indeed desirable from a built heritage perspective. The DIO therefore suggests that changes of use should not be subject to this requirement, or any policy should be carefully caveated to ensure that requirements for green/blue infrastructure would take account of site constraints. Customer Ref: 01234 Response Ref: ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email [email protected] Response Type Developer / Landowner On behalf of: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Choice 1 C We want to identify areas that can be used for future water management to enable adaptation to climate change. Do you agree with this? - Yes / No Short Response Not Answered Explanation Choice 1 D We want to clearly set out under what circumstances the development of poor quality or underused open space will be considered acceptable. Do you agree with this? - Yes / No Short Response Not Answered Explanation Customer Ref: 01234 Response Ref: ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email [email protected] Response Type Developer / Landowner On behalf of: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Choice 1 E We want to introduce a new ‘extra-large green space standard’ which recognises that as we grow communities will need access to green spaces more than 5 hectares. Do you agree with this? - Yes / No Short Response No Explanation The Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO), which is part of the Ministry of Defence (MOD), is generally supportive of the aims of the new policy but is concerned that the requirement for new communities to have access to a 5-hectare park is excessive. This requirement may impact upon the deliverability of large development sites and undermine the other aims of City Plan 2030, as set out in Choice 2, regarding higher development densities and the efficient and effective use of land. It is also unclear how the ongoing maintenance of any large new communal spaces created under this policy would be funded. If the cost of maintenance was passed to residents/proprietors of the private sector housing in the development, bearing in mind separate proposals to increase on- site affordable housing requirements, this may create a prohibitive ongoing financial burden that will reduce the attractiveness of new developments to prospective residents. This burden could also be further increased by the cost of maintaining the allotments/food growing areas proposed as part of Choice 1. In this context, it is considered that the existing policy on open space in new development should be maintained. Should City of Edinburgh Council wish to take the 5-hectare requirement forward, the DIO suggests that the policy should only apply to large greenfield urban extensions where providing open space of this this scale is more likely to be feasible. In contrast, if a 5-hectare open space was required to be accommodated within a constrained site within the existing urban envelope, such as at Redford Barracks, this could severely restrict development potential and undermine the future delivery of housing on the site. Choice 1 F We want to identify specific sites for new allotments and food growing, both as part of new development sites and within open space in the urban area. Do you agree with this? - Yes / No Short Response Not Answered Explanation See response to 1E Customer Ref: 01234 Response Ref: ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email [email protected] Response Type Developer / Landowner On behalf of: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Choice 1 F We want to identify specific sites for new allotments and food growing, both as part of new development sites and within open space in the urban area. Do you agree with this? - Upload (max size 3mb) Short Response No Explanation Choice 1 G We want to identify space for additional cemetery provision, including the potential for green and woodland burials. Do you agree with this? - Yes / No Short Response Not Answered Explanation Choice 1 H We want to revise our existing policies and green space designations to ensure that new green spaces have long term maintenance and management arrangements in place. Do you agree with this? - Yes/No Short Response Not Answered Explanation Customer Ref: 01234 Response Ref: ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email [email protected] Response Type Developer / Landowner On behalf of: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Choice 2 A We want all development (including change of use), through design and access statements, to demonstrate how their design will incorporate measures to tackle and adapt to climate change, their future adaptability and measures to address accessibility for people with varying needs, age and mobility issues as a key part of their layouts. - Yes / No Short Response Not Answered Explanation Choice 2 B We want to revise our policies on density to ensure that we make best use of the limited space in our city and that sites are not under-developed. Do you agree with this? - Yes / No Short Response No Explanation Again, the DIO is supportive of the principles set out in choice 2. However, setting a minimum density requirement for all development in the city would limit the delivery of larger family housing which there is considerable demand for. Sites in suburban or edge of city locations are well placed to meet these demands and the requirement for high density developments in these locations may push demand outside the city, to potentially less sustainable locations, and undermine housing delivery. It may also result in development that is out of context with its surroundings and which compromises the character and setting of built heritage assets including conservation areas and listed buildings. Furthermore, site constraints, and the green space requirement set out in choice 1, may make the target of 65 units per hectare difficult to achieve in some locations. In that regard it is welcomed that the ‘Housing Strategy’ paper that accompanies ‘Choices for City Plan 2030’ has proposed a site-specific density for Redford that takes account of the special characteristics of the site. However, it is suggested that this site-specific approach to housing density should not be limited to Redford, but rather should continue to be applied across the city as is done presently. Customer Ref: 01234 Response Ref: ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email [email protected] Response Type Developer / Landowner On behalf of: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Choice 2 C We want to revise our design and layout policies to achieve ensure their layouts deliver active travel and connectivity links. Do you agree with this? - Yes / No Short Response Not Answered Explanation Choice 2 D We want all development, including student housing, to deliver quality open space and public realm, useable for a range of activities, including drying space, without losing densities. Do you agree with this? - Yes / No Short Response Not Answered Explanation Customer Ref: 01234 Response Ref: ANON-KU2U-GFJG-5 Supporting Info Name Nicolas Lopez Email [email protected] Response Type Developer / Landowner On behalf of: Defence Infrastructure Organisation Choice 3 A We want all buildings and conversions to meet the zero carbon / platinum standards as set out in the current Scottish Building Regulations. Instead we could require new development to meet the bronze, silver or gold standard. Which standard should new development in Edinburgh meet? - Which standard? Short Response Not Answered Explanation Section 7 of the Building Standards Technical Handbook expressly excludes conversions and, given this, careful consideration should be given to the ramifications of requiring conversions to meet any of the standards, let alone the most stringent Platinum standard. The Platinum standard currently only covers carbon dioxide emissions and to meet it net emissions from new buildings requires to be zero. This would be extremely difficult to achieve for conversions, particularly for listed buildings where a conflict between requirements under this policy, and requirements under built heritage policies, is almost inevitable. These changes would also have a detrimental impact on the viability of conversion schemes which already tend to be more costly than new builds due to requirement for the use of traditional materials, specialist skills and the VAT that is applicable on building work and materials.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Referendum on Separation for Scotland
    House of Commons Scottish Affairs Committee The Referendum on Separation for Scotland Written evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence for the inquiry into the referendum on separation for Scotland are included. List of written evidence Page 1 Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent 1 2 Francis Tusa, Editor, Defence Analysis 8 3 Professor Jo Shaw, University of Edinburgh 14 4 Dr Phillips O’Brien, Scottish Centre for War Studies, University of Glasgow 21 5 Electoral Commission 24 6 Rt Hon Michael Moore MP, Secretary of State for Scotland 28 7 Ministry of Defence 29 8 Brian Buchan, Chief Executive, Scottish Engineering 46 9 Babcock 47 Written evidence from Professor Bernard Ryan, Law School, University of Kent Introduction If Scotland were to become independent, its relationship with the United Kingdom would have to be defined in the fields of nationality law and immigration law and policy. This note offers a summary of the relationship between the Irish state1 and the United Kingdom in those fields, and some thoughts on possible implications for Scottish independence. 1. Nationality Law 1.1 The Irish case A new nationality The nationality law of a new state must necessarily provide for two matters: an initial population of nationals on the date of independence, and the acquisition and loss of nationality on an ongoing basis. In the case of the Irish state, the initial population was defined by Article 3 of the Irish Free State Constitution of 1922. Article 3 conferred Irish Free State citizenship upon a person if they were domiciled in the “area of the jurisdiction of the Irish Free State” on the date the state was founded (6 December 1922), provided (a) they had been resident in that area for the previous seven years, or (b) they or one of their parents had been born in “Ireland”.2 A full framework of nationality law, covering all aspects of acquisition and loss of nationality, was not then adopted until the Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1935.
    [Show full text]
  • South Scotland Group Practice September 2018
    South (Scotland) Group Practice Quality report Date of inspection visits: MRS Edinburgh 7 June 2018 and 2 August 2018 Redford Barracks Edinburgh Date of publication: EH13 0PP 24 September 2018 This report describes our judgement of the quality of care at this hub and spoke Group Practice. It is based on a combination of what we found when we inspected both locations and information given to us by the services, patients and other organisations. Ratings Overall rating for this service Good Are services safe? Good Are services effective? Good Are services caring? Good Are services responsive to people’s needs? Good Are services well-led? Good 1 MRS Edinburgh and MOD Caledonia Medical Centre Group Practice Quality Report 2 August 2018 Chief Inspector’s Summary South (Scotland) Group Practice is rated as Good overall The key questions are rated as: Are services safe? – Good Are services effective? – Good Are services caring? – Good Are services responsive? – Good Are services well-led? - Good We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection of South (Scotland) Group Practice with MOD Caledonia Medical Centre inspected on 21 June 2018 and MRS Edinburgh inspected on 2 August 2018. Defence Medical Services (DMS) are not registered with the CQC under the Health and Social Care Act (2008) (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 and are not required to be. Consequently, DMS services are not subject to inspection by the CQC and the CQC has no powers of enforcement. This inspection is one of a programme of inspections that the CQC will complete at the invitation of the Surgeon General in his role as the Defence Authority for healthcare and medical operational capability.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward', Architectural Heritage, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward Citation for published version: Lowrey, J 2012, 'A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward', Architectural Heritage, vol. 23, pp. 57-74. https://doi.org/10.3366/arch.2012.0033 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3366/arch.2012.0033 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Architectural Heritage Publisher Rights Statement: © The Architectural Heritage Society. Lowrey, J. (2013). A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward. Architectural Heritage General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 John Lowrey A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward This paper considers the main characteristics of the Scottish formal landscape, as established by Sir William Bruce.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Jardine Request-417297-2D854d2c
    Secretariat Defence Infrastructure Organisation Kingston Road Sutton Coldfield B75 7RL E-mail: [email protected] www.gov.uk/DIO Thomas Jardine 24 July 2017 [email protected] Ref. FOI2017/06766 Dear Mr Jardine, Thank you for your email of 10 July 2017 requesting the following information: “Please list properties owned by the MOD in Scotland as of July 2017.” I am treating your correspondence as a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). A search for the information has now been completed within the Ministry of Defence (MOD) and I can confirm all the information in scope of your request is held. The information you have requested can be found below: ABERDEEN GORDON BARRACKS BRIDGE OF RAUXAF CENTRE EDINBURGH DON TA CENTRE FORFAR CASTLE STREET TA CENTRE TA CENTRE EDINBURGH (EAST CLAREMONT ST) DALBOG GLENESK WETC TA CENTRE EDINBURGH (MACDONALD ROAD) ARBROATH RED LION GARAGE TA CENTRE TA CENTRE EDINBURGH (GRANTON SQUARE) ARBROATH MONTROSE ROAD TA CENTRE TA CENTRE EDINBURGH (EAST CLAREMONT ST GARAGE) CARETAKERS FLAT (TA CENTRE EDINBURGH RM CONDOR EAST CLAREMONT ST) DUNOON HAFTON ESTATE TA CENTRE TA CENTRE EDINBURGH (ALNWICKHILL RD) LOCHGILPHEAD MANSE BRAE ACF WETC TA CENTRE EDINBURGH (LANARK ROAD) ARROCHAR ACF WETC TA CENTRE EDINBURGH (301 COLINTON RD) GARELOCHHEAD GREENFIELD CAMP ACF TA CENTRE EDINBURGH (REDFORD CAVALRY BARRACKS) BARONS POINT DREGHORN BARRACKS DM GLEN DOUGLAS REDFORD BARRACKS HMNB CLYDE (FASLANE) HQ 2 DIV CRAIGIEHALL TA CENTRE GLASGOW (HOULDSWORTH LOCH FYNE STREET)
    [Show full text]
  • Redford Barracks Stakeholder Workshop 01 5Th December 2018 0.0
    Redford Barracks Stakeholder Workshop 01 5th December 2018 0.0. List of Attendees Cllr Scott Arthur Mike Avery City of Edinburgh Council Cathy Bain Edinburgh Health & Social Care Partnership Eddie Banks Colinton Amenity Association David Bewsey Colinton Community Council Cllr Gavin Corbett John Corbett Craiglockhart Community Council Cllr Phil Doggart Julie Duncan City of Edinburgh Council Will Garrett City of Edinburgh Council Holly Gillingham Ministry of Defence Simon Innes 108th Pentland Scouts Cllr David Key Tim Lawson CAA & Merchiston Castle School Ruth MacDonald City of Edinburgh Council James F Napier Firrhill Community Council Andrew Paterson Colinton Community Conservation Trust Cllr Jason Rust Elaine Scott City of Edinburgh Council Chris Seiler Colinton Community Conservation Trust Michaela Smith City of Edinburgh Council Norman Tinlin Fairmilehead Community Council Facilitators Diarmaid Lawlor Architecture & Design Scotland Danny Hunter Architecture & Design Scotland Daniel McKendry Architecture & Design Scotland Steve Malone Architecture & Design Scotland 1.0 Introduction Background Workshop The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has stated that The aim of the placemaking workshop was to focus Redford Barracks is to close by 2022 as part of a wider on the surrounding communities of Redford, Colinton, rationalisation of the MOD estate. The nearby Dreghorn Oxgangs and Craiglockhart, and look at opportunities Barracks will remain open, with some of the functions which may arise from the redevelopment of Redford from Redford Barracks being relocated there. Council Barracks, seeking to agree a view on how this area officers from City of Edinburgh Council have been could be different. The workshop outcomes will inform engaging with the MOD to support the development future investment planning in the local area, including of a masterplan that could transform the Redford both the brief for the Redford Barracks site masterplan Barracks site into a successful, sustainable residential- and City of Edinburgh Council’s City Plan 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Lothians and Border Yeomanry) Squadron, the Scottish and North Irish Yeomanry
    THE HISTORY OF E (LOTHIANS AND BORDER YEOMANRY) SQUADRON, THE SCOTTISH AND NORTH IRISH YEOMANRY The full title of E Squadron is E (Lothians and Border Yeomanry) Squadron, The Scottish and North Irish Yeomanry. This title reflects the complicated history of the Sqn. This brief history is intended give an overview of the many tasks that this Sqn has been asked to do over the years. The other Sqns in The SNIY have equally varied histories and have had to prove just as adaptable. The Sqns of the SNIY are:- A (Ayrshire (Earl of Carrick’s Own) Yeomanry) Squadron, based in Ayr. B (North Irish Horse) Squadron, based in Belfast. C (Fife & Forfar Yeomanry/Scottish Horse) Squadron, based in Cupar, Fife. E (Lothians and Border Yeomanry) Squadron, based in Edinburgh. Regimental Headquarters is co-located with E Sqn at Redford Infantry Barracks in Edinburgh. E Sqn’s battle honours are recorded as in the photograph of the Regimental Standard, held in the HQ, Younger House. The Sqn’s predecessors most notably served in the Boer War and the First and Second World Wars. A memorial to the Lothians and Borders men who fell in the Boer War is located outside Dunbar Parish Church in East Lothian (in which the Regimental Standard is laid up); Dunbar is regarded as the historical home of the Sqn, having been home to the L&BH/Y through the late 19th and the early 20th Centuries. Today, this connection and that with the county town of East Lothian, is recognised through the naming of ‘Dunbar’ and ‘Haddington’ Troops and the SNIY ACF detachments.
    [Show full text]
  • Larbert's War Memorial
    129 Larbert and the Great War The Men of Larbert War Memorial Russell MacGillivray FALKIRK LOCAL HISTORY SOCIETY Larbert and the Great War published in 2017 by Falkirk Local History Society 11Neilson Street, Falkirk. ©Russell MacGillivray 2017 No part of this publication may be reproduced, or transmitted in any form, without the prior permission of Falkirk Local History Society ISBN 978 0 9560480 6 6 Falkirk Local History Society is very grateful to the Heritage Lottery Fund for the generous grant that has allowed the author to conduct his extensive research and the Society to publish the results. The grant is part of the national World War 1 project which was established to encourage the study of the impact of the Great War 1914-18 on local communities. Cover Design by James Hutcheson Printed in Scotland by Bell and Bain Limited, Glasgow Contents FOREWORD PREFACE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 Larbert in 1914 1 2 The Great War 2 3 Larbert’s War Memorial 7 4 War Medals 9 5 Western Front Memorials to the Missing 10 6 The Men of Larbert War Memorial 13 7 Deaths by Regiment 219 8 Deaths by Theatre 234 9 Calendar of Deaths 250 10 Larbert Officers 258 11 Morale and Discipline 260 12 The War Memorial 267 APPENDIX Analysis of the Men of Larbert War Memorial 270 ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY 273 BIBLIOGRAPHY 275 INDEX 279 Reverend John Fairley Minister of Larbert Parish Church (1902-1931) “Shall Larbert ever forget them? Should their names not be handed down to unborn generations as those who helped to save their nation in its hour of need.” August 1917 “Every man in the ranks who slowly climbed out of the protecting trench and at the bidding of his officer laboriously started on his journey across ‘no man’s land’ to attack an entrenched enemy deserved the highest honour his country could give him.
    [Show full text]
  • Hosehold Cavalry
    Changing the Guard, Guarding the Change of History 1. INTRODUCTION The Queen's Guard and Queen's Life Guard are the names given to contingents of cavalry and infantry soldiers charged with guarding the official royal residences in London. The British Army has had regiments of both Horse Guards and Foot Guards since before the restoration of King Charles II, and, since 1660, these have been responsible for guarding the Sovereign Palaces. The Queen's Guard and Queen's Life Guard is mounted at the royal residences which come under the operating area of London District, which is responsible for the administration of the Household Division; this covers Buckingham Palace, St James's Palace and the Tower of London, as well as Windsor Castle. The Queen's Guard is also mounted at the sovereign's other official residence, the Palace of Holyroodhouse, but not as regularly as in London. In Edinburgh, the guard is the responsibility of the resident infantry battalion at Redford Barracks. It is not mounted at the Queen's private residences at Sandringham or Balmoral. The Queen's Guard is the name given to the contingent of infantry responsible for guarding Buckingham Palace and St. James's Palace (including Clarence House) in London. The guard is made up of a company of soldiers from a single regiment, which is split in two, providing a detachment for Buckingham Palace and a detachment for St James's Palace. Because the Sovereign's official residence is still St James's, the guard commander (called the 'Captain of the Guard') is based there, as are the regiment's colours.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Development Plan (LDP) Provides a Clear and What This Plan Is For
    EDINBURGH LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOVEMBER 2016 The Local Development Plan sets out policies and proposals to guide development. Adopted 24 November 2016 The Action Programme sets out actions to deliver the Plan. The Report of Conformity explains how engagement informed the Plan. The Habitats Regulations Appraisal assesses the Plan’s impact on internationally important bird habitats. The Transport Appraisal identifies transport actions to support the Plan. The Education Appraisal identifies new and expanded schools to support the Plan. The Equalities & Rights Impact Assessment checks what impact the Plan will have on people. The Environmental Report assesses the impact of the Plan and explains the selection of new housing sites. The Housing Land Study sets out the assumption on housing land availability which inform the Local Development Plan. See the documents, supplementary guidance, and other information at: www.edinburgh.gov.uk/localdevelopmentplan www.edinburgh.gov.uk/supplementaryguidance Published in 2011 Published in 2013 Published in 2014 MAIN ISSUES REPORT OCTOBER 2011 Edinburgh Local Development Plan November 2016 Contents 1 Introduction 2 Appendix A Conservation Areas 136 Part 1 Strategy and Proposals Appendix B Shopping Centres 138 1 Aims and Strategy 7 Appendix C Table of Financial and Other Contributions 143 2 A Plan to Protect and Enhance the Environment 9 Appendix D CEC Land Ownership Schedule 144 3 A Plan to Provide Jobs, Homes and Services in the Right Locations 19 Appendix E Glossary 153 4 A Plan That Can Deliver 42 Appendix F Index of Policies 160 5 A Plan for All Parts of the City 43 Part 2 Policies 1 Delivering the Strategy 89 2 Design Principles for New Development 93 3 Caring for the Environment 99 4 Employment and Economic Development 108 5 Housing and Community Facilities 114 6 Shopping and Leisure 119 7 Transport 126 8 Resources and Services 132 1 Edinburgh Local Development Plan November 2016 Foreword 1 Introduction Edinburgh is a successful, growing city.
    [Show full text]
  • Delivering the Defence Estate
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts Delivering the defence estate Forty-seventh Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 March 2017 HC 888 Published on 22 March 2017 by authority of the House of Commons The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No. 148). Current membership Meg Hillier MP (Labour (Co-op), Hackney South and Shoreditch) (Chair) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Philip Boswell MP (Scottish National Party, Coatbridge, Chryston and Bellshill) Charlie Elphicke MP (Conservative, Dover) Chris Evans MP (Labour (Co-op), Islwyn) Caroline Flint MP (Labour, Don Valley) Kevin Foster MP (Conservative, Torbay) Simon Kirby MP (Conservative, Brighton, Kemptown) Kwasi Kwarteng MP (Conservative, Spelthorne) Nigel Mills MP (Conservative, Amber Valley) Anne Marie Morris MP (Conservative, Newton Abbot) Bridget Phillipson MP (Labour, Houghton and Sunderland South) John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Karin Smyth MP (Labour, Bristol South) Mrs Anne-Marie Trevelyan MP (Conservative, Berwick-upon-Tweed) Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 148. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website and in print by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward', Architectural Heritage, Vol
    Edinburgh Research Explorer A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward Citation for published version: Lowrey, J 2012, 'A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward', Architectural Heritage, vol. 23, pp. 57-74. https://doi.org/10.3366/arch.2012.0033 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.3366/arch.2012.0033 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Architectural Heritage Publisher Rights Statement: © The Architectural Heritage Society. Lowrey, J. (2013). A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward. Architectural Heritage General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 03. Oct. 2021 John Lowrey A Prospect on Antiquity and Britannia on Edge: Landscape Design and the Work of Sir William Bruce and Alexander Edward This paper considers the main characteristics of the Scottish formal landscape, as established by Sir William Bruce.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland's Future
    Scotland’s Future is in your hands. YOUR GUIDE T O A N Scotland’s Future is a comprehensive INDEPENDENT guide to an independent Scotland and SCOTLAND what it means for you. Scotland’s Future answers your questions about independence and sets out the facts and figures on: • How Scotland can afford to become independent. • Scotland’s economic strengths and how we can make the most of our potential. • How independence will help ensure that everyone in Scotland gets a fair deal. • The ways in which independence will strengthen Scotland’s democracy. • An independent Scotland’s place in the world. • Other issues important to you scotreferendum.com Scan here for videos related to Scotland’s Future. © Crown copyright 2013 ISBN: 978-1-78412-068-9 APS Group Scotland DPPAS20160 (11/13) SCOTREFERENDUM.COM 298070_Cover_38mm spine.indd 1 19/11/2013 17:18 © Crown copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos and images) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. The statistics in this document are up to date at the time of going to print. This document is available from our website at SCOTREFERENDUM.COM Scan here for videos related to Scotland’s Future. First published by the Scottish Government, November 2013 ISBN: 978-1-78412-068-9 ISBN: 978-1-78412-070-2 (epub) ISBN: 978-1-78412-071-9 (mobi) The Scottish Government St Andrew’s House Edinburgh EH1 3DG Produced for the Scottish Government by APS Group Scotland DPPAS20160 (11/13) Published by the Scottish Government, November 2013 298070_Cover_38mm spine.indd 2 19/11/2013 17:18 SCOTLANDʼS YOUR GUIDE TO AN FUTURE INDEPENDENT SCOTLAND Scotland’s referendum on 18 September 2014 is a choice between two futures.
    [Show full text]