Status Seekers Deborah Welch Larson and Chinese and Russian Responses Alexei Shevchenko to U.S
Status Seekers Status Seekers Deborah Welch Larson and Chinese and Russian Responses Alexei Shevchenko to U.S. Primacy Since the end of the Cold War, scholars and foreign policy analysts have debated the type of world order that the United States should strive to create—a hegemonic system, a multilateral institutional system, or a great power concert.1 Initially, a major is- sue was whether attempts to maintain U.S. primacy would stimulate counter- balancing from other states.2 But since the 2003 Iraq War, a new consideration has emerged—how to persuade other states to cooperate with U.S. global gov- ernance.3 States that do not oppose efforts by the United States to maintain sta- bility may nonetheless decline to follow its leadership. This is a matter for concern because although the United States can act alone, it cannot succeed on such issues as controlling terrorism, curbing proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), rebuilding failed states, or maintaining economic stability without help from other states. Among the states whose support is critical are China and Russia. China, which in modern times has never been accorded great power status, has expe- Deborah Welch Larson is Professor of Political Science at the University of California, Los Angeles. Alexei Shevchenko is Assistant Professor of Political Science at California State University, Fullerton. The authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions. They also thank Colin Elman, Yoshiko Herrera, David Kang, Christopher Layne, Richard Ned Lebow, and Richard Rosecrance for comments and discussion. 1. For an inºuential argument in favor of multilateralism, see G.
[Show full text]