Mahdolliset Maailmat Signs of the Times -Possible

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mahdolliset Maailmat Signs of the Times -Possible Ajan merkit mahdolliset maailmat Signs of the times possible worlds 5.-6.3.2015 Helsingissä Helsingin yliopisto Abstraktikooste / Abstract book Sisällys 1 Crossing boundaries when making sense of agency: room for new possibilities .................... 4 2 Ehdollinen ja moniselitteinen toimijuus ................................................................................... 7 3 Elämä tietokannoissa .............................................................................................................. 16 4 From welfare to workfare- labour and precarity in a mobile world ................................................. 19 5 Hyvinvoinnin ja eriarvoisuuden mekanismit .......................................................................... 26 6 Hyvinvoinnin määrittelyt ja käytännöt ................................................................................... 34 7 Immigrant integration trajectories, community formation and social theory ....................... 40 8 Instituutioiden mahdolliset lapsuudet .................................................................................... 43 9 Isät ja äidit arjessa ja ihanteissa .............................................................................................. 47 10 Juhlimiskulttuurien tutkimuksen työryhmä / Sociology of celebration ................................. 51 11 Jätteen yhteiskunta ................................................................................................................. 55 12 Kasvatussosiologia ja koulutuspolitiikka ................................................................................. 61 13 Kaupunkitutkimus ................................................................................................................... 69 14 Kolmannen sektorin muutos ja hybridiorganisaatiot ............................................................. 75 15 Kulttuuri ja kulutus .................................................................................................................. 84 16 Kulttuurin rahoitus ja ohjaus suomessa – trendit ja skenaariot ............................................. 93 17 Lasten ja nuorten mahdolliset maailmat ................................................................................ 95 18 Luokka laadullisessa tutkimuksessa ...................................................................................... 106 19 Läheissuhteet sosiaalisina sidoksina ..................................................................................... 111 20 Marx ja ajan merkit ............................................................................................................... 118 21 Millaista on sisäilmaongelmien yhteiskuntatieteellinen tutkimus? ..................................... 122 22 Neoinstitutionalism and world society theory ..................................................................... 125 23 Oikeussosiologia .................................................................................................................... 129 24 Political sociology and transnational ethnography............................................................... 133 25 Rikollisuuden, kontrollin ja väkivallan tutkimuksen työryhmä ............................................. 139 26 Sosiaalinen eriarvoisuus / Social inequality .......................................................................... 152 27 Sosiologiaa kädet savessa ..................................................................................................... 157 28 Sotilassosiologia .................................................................................................................... 162 29 Terveyssosiologia .................................................................................................................. 166 30 Turvallisuuden sosiologia ...................................................................................................... 172 31 Työ, perhe ja sukupuoliroolit ................................................................................................ 176 32 Valuation in practice: exploring processes of ordering and selection .................................. 180 33 Vuorovaikutuksen sosiologia ................................................................................................ 187 34 Yhteiskunnalliset ilmiöt ja sosiaaliset ongelmat ................................................................... 196 35 Yhteiskunnan rakenne ja sukupuoli ...................................................................................... 203 36 Yhteiskuntateorian työryhmä ............................................................................................... 205 1 CROSSING BOUNDARIES WHEN MAKING SENSE OF AGENCY: ROOM FOR NEW POSSIBILITIES Coordinators: Jose Cañada, University of Helsinki ([email protected]), Satu Venäläinen, Uni- versity of Helsinki ([email protected]), Miira Niska, University of Helsinki ([email protected]) & Antero Olakivi, University of Helsinki ([email protected]) Agency is not only a key concept in the social sciences but also an object of vast political interest. The concept is widely discussed, for instance, by political scientists, economists, sociologists and social psychologists. Furthermore, agency is examined from various meta-theoretical, theoretical and methodological perspectives. This workgroup discusses agency in relation to several sets of so- cietal and scientific boundaries. We are especially interested in discussing the ways in which bound- aries, such as those between human–nonhuman, individual–collective, micro–macro, national– transnational, discursive–material and personal–political, are handled when making sense of agency. In the spirit of interdisciplinarity, we welcome presentations that either cross, or discuss, boundaries between different disciplines in the social sciences. ABSTRACTS: The labour of boundary-keeping and the absence of boundaries Hanna-Mari Ikonen, University of Tampere ([email protected]) In this presentation, I examine the boundary work done by self-employed people. Entrepreneurs make use of their own abilities and personality, and they often work from home or on premises carefully modified for entrepreneurial purposes. Their place of business can thus be an emotionally meaningful place that becomes opened up to the public. Boundary work concerns situations in which boundaries between domains such as private–public or work–other life are blurred, perme- ated and crossed; consequently, boundary work also deals with the individuals’ subsequent prac- tices and emotions. My case entrepreneurs – six self-employed individuals working either with others or alone – operate in the Finnish countryside and serve dog owners in one way or another: some offer accommodation (for dog hobbyists especially), while others are coaches of different dog sports. Once a person has transformed a hobby into a livelihood and a livelihood into a lifestyle, it is clear that the boundaries between work and other life (home, family, leisure time) become less clear. In the case of self-em- ployed people, working with “a personal touch”, investing “the self” in the work, standing out from competitors, and pleasing customers all necessitate blurring boundaries, and these features form the core of their work. Often at the beginning of one’s entrepreneurial career, this conscious open- ing of public-private boundaries does not cause ambiguous feelings; instead, it results in a sense of agency. However, a more nuanced analysis reveals that such individuals conduct boundary-keeping work that protects the self when family time, free time and entirely private space become threat- ened. In this presentation, I depict the techniques through which work and other domains of life are kept separate, on the one hand, and, on the other hand, the methods used to bind the domains together due to the support they offer each other. 4 Agency and obedience: re-thinking Milgram’s experiment Kari Mikko Vesala, University of Helsinki ([email protected]) Milgram’s experiments on obedience to authority is undoubtedly one of the most widely known and celebrated achievements in social psychology. Most often Milgram’s study is mentioned as a testi- mony of human susceptibility and the power of social structural and situational forces over individ- ual agency. Indeed, a key point in Milgram’s own theorizing was the absence of independent agency among obeying subjects, induced through the experimental setting. Recent work on Milgram’s set- ting and the data generated by his team, however, give good grounds for re-thinking the interpre- tations of agency in his experiments. Interestingly, these new studies have taken, for example, neo- Meadian, rhetorical, and conversation analytical approaches to the issue, thus teasing out dialogue across the contested and defended boundary between mainstream substantialist social psychology and relational and constructionist approaches. The presentation discusses agency theorizing in as- sociation with Milgram’s experiments in the light of these new contributions. Representations of agency in media texts Liisa Tuomi, University of Helsinki ([email protected]) Music making is traditionally understood as masculine whereas listening is considered passive and feminine (Leppänen, 2003). Agency in music has been largely approached as an institutional action rather than to do with individuals (Aho, 2003). My approach to female music makers is that of indi- vidual agents
Recommended publications
  • Tilinpäätös 1.1.2019 – 31.12.2019
    Vihreä liitto rp Fredrikinkatu 33 A 00120 HELSINKI Y-tunnus: 0771677-3 Tilinpäätös 1.1.2019 – 31.12.2019 Tase 1 Tuloslaskelma 2-3 Liitetiedot 4-5 Hallituksen allekirjoitukset 6 Tilintarkastusmerkintä 6 Luettelo käytetyistä kirjanpitokirjoista 6 Liitteet: Tase-erittelyt 7-12 Pitkä tase 13-14 Pitkä tuloslaskelma 15-18 Tilinpäätösasiakirjat on säilytettävä vähintään 10 vuotta tilikauden päättymisestä. Tilikauden kirjanpitoaineisto on säilytettävä vähintään 6 vuotta sen vuoden lopusta, jona aikana tilikausi on päättynyt. Tilinpäätöksen laati: Blond Accounts Oy, Merja Hiltunen Electronically signed / Sähköisesti allekirjoitettu / Elektroniskt signerats / Elektronisk signert / Elektronisk underskrevet https://sign.visma.net/fi/document-check/bd1608d5-c5e9-4110-a232-b8659f5d9573 www.vismasign.com Vihreä liitto rp TASE 1 Fredrikinkatu 33 A 2 krs 00120 Helsinki Y-tunnus 0771677-3 31.12.2019 31.12.2018 V a s t a a v a a PYSYVÄT VASTAAVAT Sijoitukset Muut osakkeet ja osuudet 157 275,37 157 275,37 Sijoitukset yhteensä 157 275,37 157 275,37 Pysyvät vastaavat yhteensä 157 275,37 157 275,37 VAIHTUVAT VASTAAVAT Saamiset Pitkäaikaiset Lainasaamiset 22 947,71 34 083,57 Pitkäaikaiset yhteensä 22 947,71 34 083,57 Lyhytaikaiset Myyntisaamiset 173 284,42 78 257,53 Lainasaamiset 16 621,23 12 956,43 Muut saamiset 5 626,50 999,13 Siirtosaamiset 23 384,85 6 529,88 Lyhytaikaiset yhteensä 218 917,00 98 742,97 Rahat ja pankkisaamiset 111 116,46 363 465,94 Vaihtuvat vastaavat yhteensä 352 981,17 496 292,48 V a s t a a v a a y h t e e n s ä 510 256,54 653 567,85 V a s t a t t a v a a OMA PÄÄOMA Toimintapääoma (ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Vuosittainen Maahanmuutto- Ja Turvapaikkaraportti
    Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti SUOMI 2020 EU:n AMIF-rahaston rahoittama Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti – Suomi 2020 Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti – Suomi 2019 2 3 Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti Suomi 2020 Julkaisija: Euroopan muuttoliikeverkosto 2021 Tutkimuksesta vastaavat henkilöt: Erityisasiantuntija Tuukka Lampi (EMN Suomi) Koordinaattori Rafael Bärlund (EMN Suomi) Raportti on julkaistu ja painatettu suomen- ja englanninkielisenä seuraavilla ISBN-tunnuksilla: ISBN 978-952-7427-12-5 (PDF) ISBN 978-952-7427-14-9 (Nid.) Ulkoasu ja taitto: OSG Viestintä © kannen kuva: Kirijaki Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti – Suomi 2020 Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti – Suomi 2019 2 3 Sisällys Tiivistelmä .............................................................................................................................. 5 Kokonaiskuva 2020 ................................................................................................................ 6 1. Johdanto ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1. Suomen maahanmuuttohallinnon rakenne ............................................................................. 8 2. Maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikka-asioihin liittyvä yleinen kehitys vuonna 2020 ................. 12 2.1. Maahanmuuttopolitiikka .....................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Meetin on Mi Ration and Inte Ration January , Paris WHO's
    Ministerial Meetin on Miration and Interation January , Paris WHO’S WHO Contents Chair ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 Vice-Chairs .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Participating countries ............................................................................................................................ 5 European Union .................................................................................................................................... 36 International Organisations .................................................................................................................. 37 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) ................................................... 41 Chair Switzerland Ms. Karin Keller-Sutter Federal Councillor, Chair of the Ministerial Copyright: KEYSTONE Christian Beutler. KEYSTONE Copyright: Federal Councillor Karin Keller-Sutter was born in 1963 and is from the canton of St. Gallen, Switzerland. She attended school in Wil and Neuchâtel. Karin Keller-Sutter is a trained translator/interpreter and secondary school teacher. Between 1989 and 2000, she worked as a freelance translator and also taught at a vocational school. Karin Keller-Sutter began her political career in 1992 as a member of Wil town Council and was elected to the cantonal
    [Show full text]
  • Vuosittainen Maahanmuutto- Ja Turvapaikkaraportti
    Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti SUOMI 2020 EU:n AMIF-rahaston rahoittama Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti – Suomi 2020 2 Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti Suomi 2020 Julkaisija: Euroopan muuttoliikeverkosto 2021 Tutkimuksesta vastaavat henkilöt: Erityisasiantuntija Tuukka Lampi (EMN Suomi) Koordinaattori Rafael Bärlund (EMN Suomi) Raportti on julkaistu ja painatettu suomen- ja englanninkielisenä seuraavilla ISBN-tunnuksilla: ISBN 978-952-7427-12-5 (PDF) ISBN 978-952-7427-14-9 (Nid.) Ulkoasu ja taitto: OSG Viestintä © kannen kuva: Kirijaki Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti – Suomi 2020 Vuosittainen maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikkaraportti – Suomi 2019 3 Sisällys Tiivistelmä .............................................................................................................................. 5 Kokonaiskuva 2020 ................................................................................................................ 6 1. Johdanto ............................................................................................................................ 7 1.1. Suomen maahanmuuttohallinnon rakenne ............................................................................. 8 2. Maahanmuutto- ja turvapaikka-asioihin liittyvä yleinen kehitys vuonna 2020 ................. 12 2.1. Maahanmuuttopolitiikka .....................................................................................................12 2.2. Maahanmuutto julkisessa keskustelussa ja mediassa .............................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • City of Helsinki Annual Report 2020
    Annual Report 2020 City of Helsinki Founded 1550 Capital of Finland since 1812 Population (2020) 657,700 Total area 719 km2 Land area 217 km2 Shoreline 123 km Helsinki was founded in 1550 by King Gustav Vasa of Sweden. Helsinki was moved from its original location at the mouth of the Vantaa river to its present-day location in the 1640s during the reign of Queen Christina of Sweden. Alexander I, Emperor of Russia, named Helsinki the capital of Finland in 1812, three years after Finland became an autonomous Grand Duchy of the Russian Empire. Finland became an independent nation in 1917, and Helsinki remains the Finnish capital. Helsinki is today the hub of an economic area of about 1.5 million people and more than 700,000 jobs. 2 — City of Helsinki City of Helsinki Annual Report 2020 Contents 4 Message from the Mayor 11 City Manager’s overview 13 City Executive Office 17 Education Division 21 Urban Environment Division 25 Culture and Leisure Division 29 Social Services and Health Care Division 33 City of Helsinki organisation 35 City decision-making 37 City Council 38 City Board and Sub-committees 41 Committees and boards 42 Brief facts about Helsinki 45 City of Helsinki financial statement 2020 47 Operating expenses and revenue 48 Key indicators 2020 49 City of Helsinki income statement, cash flow statement and balance sheet 53 Personnel 54 Helsinki City Group operations and financial performance 55 Consolidated income statement, cash flow statement and balance sheet City of Helsinki — 3 Message from the Mayor The year 2020 will go down in history as an exceptional year during which many previously set plans and goals were not attained.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mind of Care Responding Ethically to COVID-19
    LAURA HELLSTEN A mind of care Responding ethically to COVID-19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30664/ar.91843 Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) his article approaches issues arising out of matter and ethics, as well as post- being in the middle of the first wave of the humanist views on agency. However, COVID-19 pandemic in Finland in March T adopting these views had never ‘mat- 2020, both from the point of view of the lived experience of caring for people in our conference tered’ as they did now. In essence, this setting, and through analysing the statements way of perceiving the world had been and actions of the Finnish government from the transformed overnight from being my point of view of an Ethics of Care. It argues that preferred way of reasoning to being an ethics of care approach is better equipped at dealing with thinking about and understanding one of the few narrative frameworks complex life situations such as the spread of the left that could make sense of the world pandemic than what the standardised taxonomy order that all of us now need to deal approaches offer. It further states that an ethics with. of care not only provides concepts and frame- works that help people grapple with challenging situations in an ethical manner, it also enables us In this article, I will explore how what has to imagine how hospitality and solidarity can be been called the standardised taxonomy envisioned anew. (mainly pertaining to deontology and utili- tarianism, from now on ST) of moral rea- Returning from Helsinki, on Thursday soning and ethical thinking falls short of 12 March 2020, I receive first a letter addressing the challenges that governments, from my university stating that confer- people and communities are facing due ences, such as our NSU Winter Sym- to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    [Show full text]
  • Update on the Corona Pandemic in the Republic of Finland August 17, 2020
    Update on the Corona Pandemic in the Republic of Finland August 17, 2020 As of today, the Finnish Public Health Authorities announced that 1 new death have been confirmed within the last 24 hours due to the Coronavirus. Since Covid-19 reached Finland the total mortality rate is now 334 people. 7 752 people have been confirmed infected and 0 people are in intensive care. Due to the deteriorating corona situation in many parts of the world, including Europe, the Finnish government will review the current travel recommendations. The government has stated that there may be a maximum of 8 corona cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 14 days for a country to be counted as a green country and that no quarantine is needed after returning from such a country. At present, 17 countries in Europe are classified as green - but the situation has deteriorated in recent weeks in several of them so that they no longer meet the criteria. Of the 17 countries, 12 should be moved to the yellow or red category. The government will therefore meet on Wednesday to discuss possible changes in the recommendations and possibly introduce new restrictions in travel. Interior Minister Maria Ohisalo says that the government also has discussed a possible interruption in air traffic between the city Skopje in the Republic of Macedonia and Finland, reports Yle Uutiset. Many cases of covid-19 have been found in travelers who have flown to Finland from Skopje. “According to THL, the infected people have had Finnish social security numbers and that border restrictions are not the most effective way to prevent the spread of infection”.
    [Show full text]
  • Update on the Corona Pandemic in the Republic of Finland July 9, 2020
    Update on the Corona Pandemic in the Republic of Finland July 9, 2020 As of today, the Finnish Public Health Authorities announced that 0 new deaths have been confirmed within the last 24 hours due to the Coronavirus. Since Covid-19 reached Finland the total mortality rate is now 329 people. 7 273 people have been confirmed infected and 2 people are in intensive care. The Finnish government has published new, eased travel restrictions. Corona infection has decreased in many places, which means that Finland can open up to both tourists and guest workers. On Wednesday evening July 8, 2020, the government held a press conference on open borders with new countries and on the possibility for berry pickers from Thailand to come to Finland. In many European countries, the corona situation has now fallen to the same level as in Finland. Therefore, the border can be opened to the Netherlands, Belgium, Italy, Greece, Austria, Malta, Germany, Slovakia, Slovenia, Hungary, Liechtenstein, and Switzerland. Travelers from Cyprus, Ireland, Andorra, San Marino and the Vatican City are also allowed. Finland also follows the EU's "green list" and allows necessary travel to and from Japan, China, Australia, Thailand, South Korea, Georgia and Tunisia, among others. However, the travel restrictions remain in force for Sweden, Spain, Portugal, Luxembourg, Poland, France and the Czech Republic. Tourists from Bulgaria, Croatia, Great Britain and Monaco are not allowed to come to Finland at the moment either. Ministers Haavisto and Ohisalo regretted once again that the infection situation is so different in Sweden and Finland. “However, we can consider regional openings later on,” said Maria Ohisalo.
    [Show full text]
  • Töölöntorinkatu 2 B +358 41 708 1928 FI-00260 HELSINKI [email protected] 1 / 1
    The Parliament of Finland and the Political Parties of Finland for Democracy – Demo Finland have the pleasure to invite you to the 10th Anniversary Seminar of Demo Finland ”Dialogue as a means of reconciliation” on the occasion of the International Day of Democracy on the 15th September Keynote speech will be given by Richard Youngs, an expert on democracy support and the European Union’s foreign policy (Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Europe). Other invited speakers include president Tarja Halonen and politicians from Demo Finland’s partner countries (Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Tunisia) and Finland. Tuesday 15th September, 8:30 – 12:45 Venue: Auditorium, Annex of the Parliament, Arkadiankatu 3, 00100 Helsinki 8:30 Arrivals and morning coffee 9:00 Opening remarks Mr. Mauri Pekkarinen, I vice-speaker of the Parliament (Centre) 9:15 Keynote speech Dr Richard Youngs, Carnegie Europe & University of Warwick 9:45 Democracy and the role of political parties in Finnish development policy Ms Lenita Toivakka, Minister for International Trade & Development (National Coalition Party) 10:00 Parties and the Parliament as supporters of democracy Mr Eero Heinäluoma, Member of Parliament (Social Democrats) 10:15 Panel discussion I on the political participation of youth Mr Simon Elo, Member of Parliament (The Finns), Ms Maria Ohisalo, Vice-president of the Party (Greens) and young MPs from Tunisia and Sri Lanka Comments by Mr Roel von Meijenfeldt Moderated by Ms Sari Varpama, Special Adviser (Demo Finland) 11:00 Break 11:15 Panel discussion II on
    [Show full text]
  • Lot of Hopes for New Government in Finland
    Lot of hopes for new government in Finland di Jukka Pietiläinen di Jukka Pietiläinen (Left Forum Finland) – A combined meeting of the party council and parliamentary group of Left Alliance decided unanimously to participate in five party coalition government led by Social Democratic prime minister Antti Rinne on Wednesday evening 5 June. Government was nominated on Thursday 6 June. Before decision Left Alliance asked the opinion of the members if the party should participate in this coalition after the negotiations on government programme were finalised on 3 June. The voting took place by internet, and a possibility to vote in paper was organised in party district offices. The voting took place from Monday afternoon to Tuesday midnight and resulted a total of 97,2% of party members approving the participation in government, 0,3% voted blanc and 1,5% opposed the participation in government. Turnout was 33,7% out of 11,000 party members. The formation of government started after parliamentary elections on 14 April with the chairperson of the largest party, SDP. After collecting answers from all parties in parliament SDP chairperson Antti Rinne made decision that five parties SDP, Centre, Greens, Left Alliance and Swedish People’s Party could form a best coalition. The Centre party had asked in opinion poll the opinion of party elite and local activists, if the party should start negotiations or remain in opposition after a huge loss of support and the worst result in elections in 100 years. Approximately 80% of around 300 activists approved the participation in coalition. Centre party which represents interests of countryside and Northern and Eastern regions has been one of the cornerstones of Finnish political system, but in 2019 it got only 13.8% of votes and 31 MPs (-18), and in Helsinki it lost even its only MP.
    [Show full text]
  • The Finnish Breadline: Stigmatisation and the Social Power Struggle of Space
    Master’s Thesis Division of Urban Geography and Regional Studies Urban Geography The Finnish Breadline: Stigmatisation and the Social Power Struggle of Space Sara Anne Haapanen 2017 Supervisors: Venla Bernelius Mari Vaattovaara HELSINGIN YLIOPISTO MATEMAATTIS-LUONNONTIETEELLINEN TIEDEKUNTA GEOTIETEIDEN JA MAANTIETEEN LAITOS MAANTIEDE PL 64 (Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2) 00014 Helsingin yliopisto Tiedekunta/Osasto Fakultet/Sektion – Faculty Laitos/Institution– Department Faculty of Science Department of Geosciences and Geography Tekijä/Författare – Author Sara Anne Haapanen Työn nimi / Arbetets titel – Title The Finnish Breadline: Stigmatisation and the Social Power Struggle of Space Oppiaine /Läroämne – Subject Urban Geography Työn laji/Arbetets art – Level Aika/Datum – Month and year Sivumäärä/ Sidoantal – Number of pages (with appendix) Master’s Thesis May 2017 127 Tiivistelmä/Referat – Abstract This thesis calls to question what impact the public nature of the Finnish breadline has on the levels of stigmatisation, in combination with the socio and spatial impacts. The effects are concerned predominately with those that use the breadline, but also the general public and those that provide the aid. Areas studied looked at how those using the food aid felt they were perceived by people around them and how it affected behaviour and emotions. Did it have any effect on the local social relations and class and how those with perceived higher status acted in return? Finally how did the queue directly impact the area? The breadline studied was in Kallio, Eastern Helsinki; a mixed area known for being a traditional working class area with a reputation for being slightly rough, but also a trend setting area with low level gentrification.
    [Show full text]
  • Matrikkeli Matrikel Riksdagens Kanslis Publikation 5/2019
    eduskunnan kanslian julkaisu 5/2019 matrikkeli 2019 matrikel matrikkeli 2019 riksdagens kanslis publikation 5/2019 matrikkeli huhtikuussa 2019 valituista kansanedustajista matrikel över riksdagsledamöter invalda i april 2019 5 /2019 isbn 978-951-53-352-8 (sid.) isbn 978-951-53-353-5 (pdf) issn 1239-1638 (painettu) issn 1795-7230 (verkkojulkaisu) suomen eduskunta valittu 2019 finlands riksdag vald 2019 Toimittanut eduskuntatiedotus Redigerad av riksdagsinformationen Eduskunnan kanslian julkaisu 5/2019 Riksdagens kanslis publikation 5/2019 ISBN 978-951-53-3752-8 (sid.) ISBN 978-951-53-3753-5 (pdf) ISSN 1239-1638 (painettu) ISSN 1795-7230 (verkkojulkaisu) Grano Oy Helsinki 2019 ALKUSANAT Tämä on matrikkeli kansanedustajista kuluvalta vaalikaudelta 2019–2022. Huhtikuun 2019 eduskuntavaaleissa sai Suomen Sosialidemokraattinen Puolue 40 kansanedustajaa, Perussuomalaiset 39 edustajaa, Kansallinen Kokoomus 38 edustajaa, Suomen Keskusta 31 edustajaa, Vihreä liitto 20 edustajaa, Vasemmistoliitto 16 edusta- jaa, Suomen ruotsalainen kansanpuolue 9 edustajaa ja Suomen Kristillisdemokraatit 5 edustajaa. Liike Nyt sai yhden kansanedustajan. Ahvenanmaalta valittiin yksi kansan- edustaja, joka liittyi Ruotsalaiseen eduskuntaryhmään. Tässä matrikkelissa on tietoja 202 kansanedustajasta. Tämä johtuu siitä, että touko- kuussa 2019 toimitetuissa Euroopan parlamentin vaaleissa tuli valituiksi kaksi kan- sanedustajaa, Teuvo Hakkarainen ja Laura Huhtasaari. Heidän edustajantoimensa on keskeytyneenä Euroopan parlamentin jäsenyyden johdosta. Keski-Suomen vaalipiiristä
    [Show full text]