Whole Day Download the Hansard
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Vision for Social Housing
Building for our future A vision for social housing The final report of Shelter’s commission on the future of social housing Building for our future: a vision for social housing 2 Building for our future: a vision for social housing Contents Contents The final report of Shelter’s commission on the future of social housing For more information on the research that 2 Foreword informs this report, 4 Our commissioners see: Shelter.org.uk/ socialhousing 6 Executive summary Chapter 1 The housing crisis Chapter 2 How have we got here? Some names have been 16 The Grenfell Tower fire: p22 p46 changed to protect the the background to the commission identity of individuals Chapter 1 22 The housing crisis Chapter 2 46 How have we got here? Chapter 3 56 The rise and decline of social housing Chapter 3 The rise and decline of social housing Chapter 4 The consequences of the decline p56 p70 Chapter 4 70 The consequences of the decline Chapter 5 86 Principles for the future of social housing Chapter 6 90 Reforming social renting Chapter 7 Chapter 5 Principles for the future of social housing Chapter 6 Reforming social renting 102 Reforming private renting p86 p90 Chapter 8 112 Building more social housing Recommendations 138 Recommendations Chapter 7 Reforming private renting Chapter 8 Building more social housing Recommendations p102 p112 p138 4 Building for our future: a vision for social housing 5 Building for our future: a vision for social housing Foreword Foreword Foreword Reverend Dr Mike Long, Chair of the commission In January 2018, the housing and homelessness charity For social housing to work as it should, a broad political Shelter brought together sixteen commissioners from consensus is needed. -
'Squatting Is a Part of the Housing Movement'
'Squatting Is A Part OF The HousinG Movement' PRACTICAL SQUATTING HISTORIES 1969 - 2019 'Squatting Is Part Of The Housing Movement' ‘...I learned how to crack window panes with a hammer muffled in a sock and then to undo the catch inside. Most houses were uninhabit- able, for they had already been dis- embowelled by the Council. The gas and electricity were disconnected, the toilets smashed...Finally we found a house near King’s Cross. It was a disused laundry, rather cramped and with a shopfront window...That night we changed the lock. Next day, we moved in. In the weeks that followed, the other derelict houses came to life as squatting spread. All the way up Caledonian Road corrugated iron was stripped from doors and windows; fresh paint appeared, and cats, flow- erpots, and bicycles; roughly printed posters offered housing advice and free pregnancy testing...’ Sidey Palenyendi and her daughters outside their new squatted home in June Guthrie, a character in the novel Finsbury Park, housed through the ‘Every Move You Make’, actions of Haringey Family Squatting Association, 1973 Alison Fell, 1984 Front Cover: 18th January 1969, Maggie O’Shannon & her two children squatted 7 Camelford Rd, Notting Hill. After 6 weeks she received a rent book! Maggie said ‘They might call me a troublemaker. Ok, if they do, I’m a trouble maker by fighting FOR the rights of the people...’ 'Squatting Is Part Of The Housing Movement' ‘Some want to continue living ‘normal lives,’ others to live ‘alternative’ lives, others to use squatting as a base for political action. -
Annex E2 Visit Reports.Pdf
Annex E2 Final Report Working Group 1 – Engineers WG1: Report on visit to the Ledbury Estate, Peckham, Southwark November 30th 2018. The Ledbury Estate is in Peckham and includes four 14-storey Large Panel System (LPS) tower blocks. The estate belongs to Southwark Council. The buildings were built for the GLC between 1968 and 1970. The dates of construction as listed as Bromyard (1968), Sarnsfield (1969), Skenfrith (1969) and Peterchurch House (1970). The WG1 group visited Peterchurch House on November 30th 2018. The WG1 group was met by Tony Hunter, Head of Engineering, and, Stuart Davis, Director of Asset Management and Mike Tyrrell, Director of the Ledbury Estate. The Ledbury website https://www.southwark.gov.uk/housing/safety-in-the-home/fire-safety-on-the- ledbury-estate?chapter=2 includes the latest Fire Risk Assessments, the Arup Structural Reports and various Residents Voice documents. This allowed us a good understanding of the site situation before the visit. In addition, Tony Hunter sent us copies of various standard regulatory reports. Southwark use Rowanwood Apex Asset Management System to manage their regulatory and ppm work. Following the Structural Surveys carried out by Arup in November 2017 which advised that the tower construction was not adequate to withstand a gas explosion, all piped gas was removed from the Ledbury Estate and a distributed heat system installed with Heat Interface Units (HIU) in each flat. Currently fed by an external boiler system. A tour of Peterchurch House was made including a visit to an empty flat where the Arup investigation points could be seen. -
TALL BUILDINGS BACKGROUND PAPER 1 1.2 Scope of Background Paper This Paper Covers the Entirety of the London Borough of Southwark, As Seen in Figure 2
NEW SOUTHWARK PLAN BACKGROUND PAPER TALL BUILDINGS JUNE 2020 Contents 1 Executive Summary 1 1.1 Purpose of Background Paper 1 1.2 Area Scope 2 1.3 Approach to Tall Buildings 3 1.4 Tall Buildings Definition 3 1.5 Areas Identified as most appropriate for tall buildings 3 2 Current Policy Context 5 2.1 National Planning Policy and Guidance 5 2.1.1 National Planning Policy Framework 2019 5 2.1.2 Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government National Design Guide 2019 5 2.2.3 Historic England Advice Note 4 2015 and Draft 2020 6 2.2 Regional Planning Policy and Guidance 6 2.2.1 London Plan 2016 and Emerging London Plan 2019 6 2.2.2 London View Management Framework (LVMF) Supplementary Planning Guidance 2012 6 3.8 Evolution of Southwark’s Local Plan Tall Building Strategy 7 3 Existing Context of Tall Buildings 8 3.1 Tall Buildings in London Borough of Southwark 8 3.2 Tall Buildings in Surrounding Area 10 4 Analysis: Most Appropriate Locations for Tall Buildings 12 4.1 Proximity to Existing Major Transport Nodes 12 4.2 Gateways, junctions of major roads, town centres and points of civic or local significance 14 4.3 Potential for New Open Space and Public Realm 15 4.4 Focus for Regeneration and New Large Scale Development and Investment 15 5 Analysis: Considerations for Tall Buildings 19 5.1 Topography 19 5.2 Borough Views 19 5.3 Strategic Views 21 5.4 Settings and Views of World Heritage Sites 22 5.5 Settings and Views of Heritage Assets 22 5.5.1 Conservation Areas 22 5.5.2 Listed Buildings 24 5.6 Thames Policy Area 24 5.7 Historic Parks -
Tees Valley Combined Authority Agenda
Tees Valley Combined Authority Agenda www.stockton.gov.uk Date: Monday, 4th April, 2016 at 11.00am Venue: The Curve, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BA Membership: Councillor Bill Dixon (Leader of Darlington Borough Council) Councillor Christopher Akers-Belcher (Leader of Hartlepool Council) Mayor David Budd (Mayor of Middlesbrough Council) Councillor Sue Jeffrey (Leader of Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council) Councillor Bob Cook (Leader of Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council) Paul Booth (Chair of Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) Associate Membership: Phil Cook (Member of Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) Paul Croney(Member of Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) Ian Kinnery (Member of Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) Alastair MacColl (Member of Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) Naz Parkar (Member of Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) Nigel Perry (Member of Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) David Robinson (Member of Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) David Soley (Member of Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) Alison Thain (Member of Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) AGENDA 1. Confirmation of Membership:- 1. To note the constituent Tees Valley Council Members appointed to the Tees Valley Combined Authority 2. To agree the nomination from the Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership (The Chair of the Tees Valley Local Enterprise Partnership) 3. To agree the Associate Membership of the Tees Valley Combined Authority 2. Appointment of Chair To appoint a Chair for the period up until the date of the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Tees Valley Combined Authority 1 Tees Valley Combined Authority Agenda www.stockton.gov.uk 3. Apologies for absence 4. Appointment of Vice Chair To appoint a Vice Chair for the period up until the date of the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Tees Valley Combined Authority 5. -
Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Appeal Under Section 78 by Emery Planning on Behalf of Glennmark Trading Ltd
TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 APPEAL UNDER SECTION 78 BY EMERY PLANNING ON BEHALF OF GLENNMARK TRADING LTD. HIGH PEAK REFERENCE: HPK/2015/0471 PLANNING INSPECTORATE REFERENCE: APP/H1033/W/16/3155484 PROOF OF EVIDENCE OF MELISSA KURIHARA MLPM, MRTPI 1 Proof of Evidence on behalf of High Peak Borough Council Brown Edge Road, Buxton Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Planning Policy 4 3. The Case for High Peak Borough Council 9 4. Conclusions 19 Appendix 1: Appeal decision Land off Craythorne Road, Stretton APP/B3410/W/15/3134848 Appendix 2: Appeal decision Land between Ashflats & A449, Mosspit, Stafford APP/Y3425/A/14/2217578 Appendix 3: Appeal decision Land bounded by Gresty Lane, Crewe APP/R0660/A/13/2209335 Appendix 4: Deliverable supply tables (large sites and allocations) Appendix 5: Proof of Evidence of A G Massie APP/H1033/W/16/3147726 Appendix 6: Rebuttal Proof of Evidence of A G Massie APP/H1033/W/16/3147726 2 1. Introduction 1.1. This Proof of Evidence has been prepared by Melissa Kurihara, Principal Planning Consultant at Urban Vision Partnership Ltd, a multi disciplinary planning consultancy based in Salford. 1.2. I am a chartered town planner with significant professional experience in housing land supply. I hold a Masters in Landscape, Planning and Management from University of Manchester and I am a member of the Royal Town Planning Institute. Prior to joining Urban Vision I worked in various planning policy teams within local government. 1.3. I have experience of all stages in Local Plan production from initial evidence gathering and the establishment of the correct OAN, through to submission, independent examination and adoption. -
Southwark Council Ledbury Estate Structural Robustness Assessment for Large Panel System Tower Blocks with Piped Gas
Southwark Council Ledbury Estate Structural Robustness Assessment for Large Panel System Tower Blocks with Piped Gas Issue 2 | 30 August 2017 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 245112-05 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Southwark Council Ledbury Estate Structural Robustness Assessment for Large Panel System Tower Blocks with Piped Gas Contents Page 1 Introduction and Brief 1 2 The Buildings 3 2.1 Description of Building 3 2.2 History of Ledbury Estate and LPS buildings 5 3 Investigations 7 3.1 Description of investigations 7 3.2 Findings of investigations 8 3.3 Limitations of investigations 17 4 Assessment 18 4.1 Assessment Criteria 18 4.2 Assessment Discussion 19 5 Future actions 23 6 Conclusions 24 7 References 25 Appendix A TWA buildings with ‘Type B’ H2 Joint | Issue 2 | 30 August 2017 1 Introduction and Brief In July 2017, Arup was appointed by Southwark Council to carry out a visual investigation into the structure of four tower blocks on the Ledbury Estate, after residents reported cracks appearing in the ceilings, floor and walls. This investigation concluded that these cracks were gaps between the non-load bearing concrete panels. No gaps were found between load-bearing elements and therefore the loadpath as intended by the original design is unchanged. The Estate comprises of four geometrically identical 14-storey precast concrete Large Panel System (LPS) tower blocks. -
National Comparative Audit of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding and the Use of Blood
National Comparative Audit of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding and the Use of Blood Results from a National Audit May 2016 This report has been endorsed by NHS Blood and Transplant, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, the British Society of Gastroenterology and the British Society of Interventional Radiology. The project has been funded by NHS Blood and Transplant and the Bowel Disease Research Foundation. Foreword This Audit, funded by NHS Blood and Transplant and the Bowel Disease Research Foundation, represents a tremendous amount of hard work and has produced data of the utmost importance for the development of a safe and efficient lower GI bleeding service. On behalf of ACPGBI I should like to pay tribute to everyone who participated in this project especially those who are mentioned in the Acknowledgements and the List of Participating Sites across the UK. Although lower GI bleeding rarely presents as major haemorrhage it is clear that many hospitals are not adequately set up to provide safe acute haemorrhage control. In addition, it appears that many patients admitted with lower GI bleeding are not investigated but are often transfused inappropriately. The recommendations stemming from this audit are practical, sensible and potentially lifesaving, and are fully endorsed by the ACPGBI. Professor Bob Steele President ACPGBI Table of Contents Acknowledgements 3 Executive Summary 4 Recommendations 7 Definitions and Abbreviations 9 1. Introduction 10 2. Methods 12 3. Audit Standards 16 4. Participation Results 18 5. Principal Findings 18 6. Audit Results: Patient Specific Data 26 Clinical Examination and Investigations Laboratory Tests Medicines Management Red Cell Transfusion Platelet and Fresh Frozen Plasma Transfusion Inpatient Investigation Surgery Summary of Key Findings 7. -
Download (2586Kb)
A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick Permanent WRAP URL: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/81943 Copyright and reuse: This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. For more information, please contact the WRAP Team at: [email protected] warwick.ac.uk/lib-publications Engaging Individuals to be Effective Collectives: A Ganzian Analysis of Leader/Follower Relationships in Times of Challenge. Clare Alexina Holt, MSc Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) University of Warwick Warwick Business School June 2016 1 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 7 ACRONYMS 8 ABSTRACT 10 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 11 Scotland Bucks the Trend 18 Indifference – The Directly Elected Mayors 21 Referenda 2002 and 2012 How do Leaders Engage and Improve 24 Relations? The Chapters Ahead 25 Contribution to Academia 30 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 31 Theory of Leadership: An Individual Hero or 31 a Relational Process? Social Movement Theory and Collective 55 Identity Stories in Organizations 62 Emotion, Trust and Transparency 73 Human Error and Prozac Leadership 79 A Ganzian Analysis 86 SUMMARY 108 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY 110 INTRODUCTION 110 Research Strategy 112 2 Researching Strategies in the Field of 114 Leadership Research Design 117 Methodology for the Commission Report 126 Grounded Theory: It is not a Theory, but a 132 -
BRUTAL LONDON Robin Hood Gardens CONSTRUCT YOUR OWN CONCRETE CAPITAL Space House ZUPAGRAFIKA, with CONTRIBUTIONS by JOHN GRINDROD and PETER CHADWICK
Appealing to fans of architecture, this ingeniously designed book lets you build replicas of some of London’s iconic post-war concrete structures while learning about their place in the city’s architectural history. Featured buildings: Alexandra Road Estate Alton Estate Aylesbury Estate Balfron Tower Barbican Estate Ledbury Estate National Theatre BRUTAL LONDON Robin Hood Gardens CONSTRUCT YOUR OWN CONCRETE CAPITAL Space House ZUPAGRAFIKA, WITH CONTRIBUTIONS BY JOHN GRINDROD AND PETER CHADWICK In this fun and intellectually stimulating book, readers can recreate a number of London’s most renowned Brutalist buildings. Opening with an informative history of the origins and philosophy of Brutalist architecture, the book then focuses on 9 buildings, including the Barbican Estate, Robin Hood Gardens, Balfron Tower and the National Theatre. The first part of the book looks at the significance of each of these buildings, with a short chapter on each, complete with texts and images. The second part of the book consists of a series of 9 pre-cut and folded buildings, printed on heavy card stock, that readers can detach and construct with easy-to- follow instructions. At once fun and informative, this unique book offers a challenging and entertaining approach to architecture. ZUPAGRAFIKA is a creative design studio based in Poland, founded by David Navarro and Martyna Sobecka. The studio originates, illustrates, designs, and publishes their own award-winning, architecture-related objects. JOHN GRINDROD is an author and journalist. He wrote the book Concretopia: A Journey Around the Rebuilding of Postwar Britain and has contributed to The Guardian, the Financial Times, C20 magazine and The Modernist. -
Old Kent Road Characterisation Study
OLD KENT ROAD CHARACTERISATION STUDY November 2015 Allies and Morrison Urban Practitioners CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 5 4 OVERALL CHARACTER 49 1.1 Introduction and Purpose 7 4.1 Overarching Character Description 51 1.2 Approach 7 4.2 Area description 63 1.3 Report Structure 7 4.3 Western Area 64 1.4 Strategic Context 9 4.4 Northern Area 70 1.5 Best Practice Guidance 9 4.5 Southern Area 76 1.6 Consultation 11 4.6 The Old Kent Road 82 2 HISTORICAL SUMMARY 13 5 CONCLUSIONS 85 2.1 Overview 14 2.2 Key periods 14 2.3 Evolution 17 APPENDIX A - CHARACTER AREAS 3 AREA WIDE ANALYSIS 21 APPENDIX B - CONSULTATION SUMMARY 3.1 Built Form 23 APPENDIX C - DESIGNATED HERITAGE STRUCTURES 3.2 Evolving Street Form 24 3.3 Heritage Designations 27 3.4 Movement 29 3.5 Land use 37 3.6 Social Housing Estates 39 3.7 Public Space 41 3.8 Building Height 43 3.9 Block Size 45 3.10 Socio-economic Character 46 Photo: Old Kent Road, 1905 OLD KENT ROAD Characterisation Study November 2015 3 INTRODUCTION 1 AND CONTEXT central activity zone opportunity areas tall building cluster preferred industrial location industrial business park study area boundary Strategic context of the Old Kent Road Opportunity Area 6 1 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 1 INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT 1.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE 1.2 APPROACH 1.3 REPORT STRUCTURE The characterisation study has involved extensive This characterisation study report is divided into the 1.1.1 Introduction and role 1.1.2 Background survey work - both reviewing existing data and following sections: This characterisation study comprises part of The Old Kent Road area has a remarkable past: undertaking site visits - to establish a detailed the urban design evidence base which informs Roman Watling Street, the medieval Pilgrim route understanding of the area. -
Tees Valley Devolution Deal
Tees Valley Devolution Deal 1 2 Cllr Bob Cook Leader, Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council ……………………………………… Cllr Sue Jeffrey Leader, Redcar and Cleveland Council ……………………………………… Cllr Christopher Akers-Belcher Leader, Hartlepool Borough Council ……………………………………… Mayor Dave Budd Mayor of Middlesbrough ……………………………………… Cllr Bill Dixon Leader, Darlington Borough Council ……………………………………… Paul Booth OBE Chair, Tees Valley Unlimited Local ……………………………………… Enterprise Partnership The Rt.Hon. George Osborne Chancellor of the Exchequer ……………………………………… The Rt. Hon. Greg Clark Secretary of State for Communities and ……………………………………… Local Government Lord O’Neill of Gatley Commercial Secretary to the Treasury ……………………………………… James Wharton Minister for Local Growth and the Northern ……………………………………… Powerhouse 3 4 Summary of the Devolution Deal agreed in principle by the Government and Tees Valley Shadow Combined Authority Leadership Board The Tees Valley Shadow Combined Authority Leadership Board and the Government have agreed in principle a radical devolution of funding powers and responsibilities. A Combined Authority will be created as soon as possible and a directly elected Mayor for Tees Valley will be established from May 2017. The Mayor will work as part of the Combined Authority subject to local democratic scrutiny, and in partnership with business, through Tees Valley Unlimited, the Local Enterprise Partnership for Tees Valley. This agreement will be conditional on the legislative process, agreement by the constituent councils, and formal endorsement by the Tees Valley Combined Authority Leadership Board (which currently exists in shadow form). The deal provides for the transfer of significant powers for employment and skills, transport, planning and investment from central government to the Tees Valley. It paves the way for further devolution over time and for the reform of public services to be led by Tees Valley.