A Community of Communities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Community of Communities A Community of Communities Report of the Commission on Representation of the Interests of the British Jewish Community March 2000 2 Adar 5160 The lnstitute for Jewish Policy Research (JPR) is an independent think-tank which informs and influences opinion and decision-making on social, political and cultural issues a{fecting Jewish life. The Commission on Representation of the lnterests of the British Jewish Community was established as an independent working party in 1998 by JPR, which provlded the secretariat and a home for the Commission. Members were drawn on an ad personam basis from a cross-section of Britlsh Jewry in terms of gender, region and rellgious outlook. The Commission's task was to examine how the interests of the Britlsh Jewlsh community are represented at various levels-withln the community, to Jewish communities abroad and in the wider UK soclety. The Commission was also asked to make recommendations on how the representation of these interests can best be organized for the twenty-first century. JPR pledged to publish the report of the Commission Members of the Commission / Report a uthors Davrd Blackburn Lucie Hass Stephen Chelms Maurlce Helf gott Adrian Cohen Proiessor Ba rry Kosmin Ruth Deech Dr Mary Rudolf Krom Jean Gaffln, OBE Melanie Ph llips Professor IVargaret Harris Carolyn Taylor Secretariat Antony Lerman Dr Winston Prckett Andrea Margolit Lena Stanley-Clamp Contents Summary 1 Recommendations 3 l lntroduction I 2 For What Sort of British Jewry ls Representation Being U n derta ken? 13 3ln What Kind of Britain ls Representation Taking Place? 15 4 The Current Pattern of Representation 19 5 Gathering ldeas: The Consultation Exercise 23 Appendix 1 Jewish Communal Organizations Engaged in Representation 34 Appendix 2 Representation in Five Jewish Communities- France, the Netherlands, Australia, Canada and the USA by Daniel E lazar 44 Appendix 3 United Kingdom Legislation Concerning Jews by His Honour Judge Aron Owen and Sheriff G. H. Gordon, OC, LLD 50 Appendix 4 Gathering the Evidence Consultations via Town Meetings, lnterviews and Ouestionna- ires 54 Summary degree of growth in the last decade. Setting the stage: reasons for the Recent studies on issues oflewish identity have Comm ission's establ ish ment shown a trend towards non-synagogal modes of Over the past 300 years BritishJews have affiliation and a rising number of marriages with established well-developed representative non-Jews. Yet, paradoxically, at the same time there structures. However, there is an increasing is greater confidence among the strictly Orthodox, recognition that we are in a period of rapid change. a huge investment and expansion inJewish The pace of this change has placed considerable education and a stronger sense of British Jewish stmin on the historic centml representative identity structures: the Board of Deputies of BritishJews and the Chief Rabbinate. Vocal andvariegated Finally British Jews increasingly regmd rhemselves interest groups, ranging from the strictly Orthodox in ethnic terms. Alongside religion, culture and to the progressive, claim that the current modes of language, their ethnicity includes feelings of kinship representation fail to include them or speak for and belonging, and a desire for group continuity In their interests. practice, however, most British Jews presently regard the synagogue as the only practicable way Questions have been raised as to whyJewish open to them to identifywith and belong to representative institutions have been unable to somethingJewish. defuse tensions and resolve disputes that frequently surface in the public sphere. In addition, new Changing Britain organtzations are continually emerging to address In what kind of Britain, then, is representation the wider society on matters ofJewish interest. taking place? Finally many individuals particularly women, the Britain has become more diverse in terms of younger generation and -the unaffiliated-feel religion, ethnic origin, culture and lifestyle. It is now disenfranchised. Aware that decisions taken by often referred to as a multicultural society Ethnic, othens affect them, they do not believe that they regional and other differences are increasingly have the means of influencing those decisions. They portrayed as requiring not merely toleration, but also do not feel the present representational also acknowledgement, respect, resources and structures meet thet needs. representation. Changing British Jewry The most significant changes are structural, affecting The Commission asked: 'For what sort of British the various tiers of government to whichJews have Jewry is representation being undeftaken?' The traditionally made representations. The changes answer was: a communiry in transition. under way that are akeady affecting Britain's central political institutions promise to alter significantly the In terms of demography, there has been a pattern of power, leading to new challenges and significant decline in the estimatedJewish opportunities for representational activiry They population, which now numbers under 300,000 include reform of the House of Lords, devolution people. Despite the fact that today approximately 70 and regionalization, changes in local government, per cent of the population, of UKJews are formally including a London mayor and Greater London linked to a synagogue, approximately one third of Authority and closer integration into the European the population is religiously unaffiliated. Union. Moreover, those BritishJews who are affiliated to a Mapping current representation synagogue are increasingly diverse and are The Commission identified thoseJewish communal segmented across the following groupings: organizations that carry out representation, together with their main target audiences: .60.7 per cent belong to central Orthodox government and Padiament, local authorities, synagogues (Ashkenazi and Sephardi); international and European organrzations, foreign governments, international Jewish organizations, . 2B.B per cent belong to progressive q,nagogues Israel, Diaspora communities, European Jewish (Reform, Liberal and Masorti); organzations, other-faith minority groups, the . 10.5 per cent belong to strictly Orthodox (llaredi) voluntary sector, the media and other opinion synagogues, which have shown the greatest formem. This information is discussed in Section 4 and ha-s representation, representation abroad and internal been produced in diagrammatic form. The Jewish divisions. organrzational map seryed a^s the starting point for analysing Jewish representation, revealing in stark Among the key questions surrounding the current relief its multi-faceted, diverse and complex nature. state of representational activity, the following emerged: Gathering ideas: the consultation exercise For more than eighteen months the Commission . Do the multiple layers of special interest and carried out its research and deliberations on a representation constitute needless duplication or variery of levels. It canvassed zLS many people as strength through diversiry? possible within theJewish community, together . Should there be one or manyvoices? with those in the wider society who are the main target audiences ofJewish representation. V4-nt is the role of religious representation? . Do theJewish media have a role in A detailed questionnaire on the scope, subject representation? matter and comprehensiveness ofJewish representation was compiled, and copies were sent . V4rat is the place of informal representation? to more than 2,000Jewish organizations and r How is theJewish community regarded by the individuals. Advertisements were placed in the targets of representation-as a religious or an national andJewish press inviting people to request ethnic group? a questionnaire, and a special web-site was established to allow respondents to submit their . V{hen is collective representation necessary? answers on-line. Through the Commission's wide-ranging Seven'town meetings'were held in Central consultations with every sector of theJewish London, Redbridge, Golders Green, Brighton, community an overridin g leitmotif began to Manchesteq Glasgow and Ieeds. Smaller focus emerge: a growing realization that a means of groups and discussions were also held. Finally the representation regarded as effective in the past or Commission conducted in-depth interviews with even today may not be adequate in the future. more than seventy key informzurts, both inside and outside the British Jewish community The Commission obseled that, while people were quick to express their concerns and extensive During the Commission's evidence-gathering, criticisms of existing representative structures, they certain recurring themes emerged: questions of were less willing, initizrlly, to posit solutions. leadership, consultation, professionalism, Nevertheless, a number of solutions were put networking and coordination, reaching the forward and subsequently seffed as a basis for the unaffiliated, internal, informal and religious Commission's recommendations, which follow. Recom mendations The following section is in two pafts: 'Principles for action' and 'Implementation of principles'. Both grew out of a consideration of the evidence, ideas and suggestions expressed during the consultative process. Together they constitute a strategic direction that we believe will meet the current and emerging representational needs of the BritishJewish community Principles for action 1 For the purposes of representation we should adopt aninclusiue d.eftnition of the
Recommended publications
  • Antisemitism in the Radical Left and the British Labour Party, by Dave Rich
    Kantor Center Position Papers Editor: Mikael Shainkman January 2018 ANTISEMITISM IN THE RADICAL LEFT AND THE BRITISH LABOUR PARTY Dave Rich* Executive Summary Antisemitism has become a national political issue and a headline story in Britain for the first time in decades because of ongoing problems in the Labour Party. Labour used to enjoy widespread Jewish support but increasing left wing hostility towards Israel and Zionism, and a failure to understand and properly oppose contemporary antisemitism, has placed increasing distance between the party and the UK Jewish community. This has emerged under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, a product of the radical 1960s New Left that sees Israel as an apartheid state created by colonialism, but it has been building on the fringes of the left for decades. Since Corbyn became party leader, numerous examples of antisemitic remarks made by Labour members, activists and elected officials have come to light. These remarks range from opposition to Israel’s existence or claims that Zionism collaborated with Nazism, to conspiracy theories about the Rothschilds or ISIS. The party has tried to tackle the problem of antisemitism through procedural means and generic declarations opposing antisemitism, but it appears incapable of addressing the political culture that produces this antisemitism: possibly because this radical political culture, borne of anti-war protests and allied to Islamist movements, is precisely where Jeremy Corbyn and his closest associates find their political home. A Crisis of Antisemitism Since early 2016, antisemitism has become a national political issue in Britain for the first time in decades. This hasn’t come about because of a surge in support for the far right, or jihadist terrorism against Jews.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections
    Anti-Zionism and Antisemitism Cosmopolitan Reflections David Hirsh Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths, University of London, New Cross, London SE14 6NW, UK The Working Papers Series is intended to initiate discussion, debate and discourse on a wide variety of issues as it pertains to the analysis of antisemitism, and to further the study of this subject matter. Please feel free to submit papers to the ISGAP working paper series. Contact the ISGAP Coordinator or the Editor of the Working Paper Series, Charles Asher Small. Working Paper Hirsh 2007 ISSN: 1940-610X © Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy ISGAP 165 East 56th Street, Second floor New York, NY 10022 United States Office Telephone: 212-230-1840 www.isgap.org ABSTRACT This paper aims to disentangle the difficult relationship between anti-Zionism and antisemitism. On one side, antisemitism appears as a pressing contemporary problem, intimately connected to an intensification of hostility to Israel. Opposing accounts downplay the fact of antisemitism and tend to treat the charge as an instrumental attempt to de-legitimize criticism of Israel. I address the central relationship both conceptually and through a number of empirical case studies which lie in the disputed territory between criticism and demonization. The paper focuses on current debates in the British public sphere and in particular on the campaign to boycott Israeli academia. Sociologically the paper seeks to develop a cosmopolitan framework to confront the methodological nationalism of both Zionism and anti-Zionism. It does not assume that exaggerated hostility to Israel is caused by underlying antisemitism but it explores the possibility that antisemitism may be an effect even of some antiracist forms of anti- Zionism.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture-Sensitive Counselling, Psychotherapy and Support Groups in the Orthodox-Jewish Community: How They Work and How They Are Experienced
    1 International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 50, 227-240. Culture-sensitive counselling, psychotherapy and support groups in the orthodox-Jewish community: How they work and how they are experienced. Kate Miriam Loewenthal and Marian Brooke Rogers Psychology Department Royal Holloway University of London Egham Surrey TW20 0EX 01784 443601 [email protected] 2 Culture-sensitive counselling, psychotherapy and support groups in the orthodox-Jewish community: How they work and how they are experienced. Abstract Background: There is political and scientific goodwill towards the provision of culture-sensitive support, but as yet little knowledge about how such support works and what are it strengths and difficulties in practice. Aims: To study groups offering culture-sensitive psychological and other support to the strictly- orthodox Jewish community in London. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with service providers, potential and actual users from the community, and professionals serving the community. Interviews asked about the aims, functioning and achievements of 10 support groups. Results: Thematic analysis identified seven important themes: admiration for the work of the groups; appreciation of the benefits of culture-sensitive services; concerns over confidentiality and stigma; concerns over finance and fundraising; concerns about professionalism; the importance of liaison with rabbinic authorities; need for better dissemination of information. Conclusions: The strengths and difficulties of providing culture-sensitive services in one community were identified. Areas for attention include vigilance regarding confidentiality, improvements in disseminating information, improvements in the reliability of funding, and attention to systematic needs assessment, and to the examination of efficacy of these forms of service provision. 3 Culture-sensitive counselling, psychotherapy and support groups in the orthodox-Jewish community: How they work and how they are experienced.
    [Show full text]
  • Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003
    Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003 Based on information by the National Focal Points of the RAXEN Information Network Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 – 2003 Based on information by the National Focal Points of the EUMC - RAXEN Information Network EUMC - Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 - 2003 2 EUMC – Manifestations of Antisemitism in the EU 2002 – 2003 Foreword Following concerns from many quarters over what seemed to be a serious increase in acts of antisemitism in some parts of Europe, especially in March/April 2002, the EUMC asked the 15 National Focal Points of its Racism and Xenophobia Network (RAXEN) to direct a special focus on antisemitism in its data collection activities. This comprehensive report is one of the outcomes of that initiative. It represents the first time in the EU that data on antisemitism has been collected systematically, using common guidelines for each Member State. The national reports delivered by the RAXEN network provide an overview of incidents of antisemitism, the political, academic and media reactions to it, information from public opinion polls and attitude surveys, and examples of good practice to combat antisemitism, from information available in the years 2002 – 2003. On receipt of these national reports, the EUMC then asked an independent scholar, Dr Alexander Pollak, to make an evaluation of the quality and availability of this data on antisemitism in each country, and identify problem areas and gaps. The country-by-country information provided by the 15 National Focal Points, and the analysis by Dr Pollak, form Chapter 1 and Chapter 2 of this report respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour, Antisemitism and the News – a Disinformation Paradigm
    Labour, Antisemitism and the News A disinformation paradigm Dr Justin Schlosberg Laura Laker September 2018 2 Executive Summary • Over 250 articles and news segments from the largest UK news providers (online and television) were subjected to in-depth case study analysis involving both quantitative and qualitative methods • 29 examples of false statements or claims were identified, several of them made by anchors or correspondents themselves, six of them surfacing on BBC television news programmes, and eight on TheGuardian.com • A further 66 clear instances of misleading or distorted coverage including misquotations, reliance on single source accounts, omission of essential facts or right of reply, and repeated value-based assumptions made by broadcasters without evidence or qualification. In total, a quarter of the sample contained at least one documented inaccuracy or distortion. • Overwhelming source imbalance, especially on television news where voices critical of Labour’s code of conduct were regularly given an unchallenged and exclusive platform, outnumbering those defending Labour by nearly 4 to 1. Nearly half of Guardian reports on the controversy surrounding Labour’s code of conduct featured no quoted sources defending the party or leadership. The Media Reform Coalition has conducted in-depth research on the controversy surrounding antisemitism in the Labour Party, focusing on media coverage of the crisis during the summer of 2018. Following extensive case study research, we identified myriad inaccuracies and distortions in online and television news including marked skews in sourcing, omission of essential context or right of reply, misquotation, and false assertions made either by journalists themselves or sources whose contentious claims were neither challenged nor countered.
    [Show full text]
  • Anglo-Jewry's Experience of Secondary Education
    Anglo-Jewry’s Experience of Secondary Education from the 1830s until 1920 Emma Tanya Harris A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements For award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Hebrew and Jewish Studies University College London London 2007 1 UMI Number: U592088 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592088 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract of Thesis This thesis examines the birth of secondary education for Jews in England, focusing on the middle classes as defined in the text. This study explores various types of secondary education that are categorised under one of two generic terms - Jewish secondary education or secondary education for Jews. The former describes institutions, offered by individual Jews, which provided a blend of religious and/or secular education. The latter focuses on non-Jewish schools which accepted Jews (and some which did not but were, nevertheless, attended by Jews). Whilst this work emphasises London and its environs, other areas of Jewish residence, both major and minor, are also investigated.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared by the European Jewish Congress, Secretariat and Member of the Advisory 2016 Board of the European Parliament Working Group on Antisemitism (WGAS)
    Prepared by the European Jewish Congress, Secretariat and Member of the Advisory 2016 Board of the European Parliament Working Group on Antisemitism (WGAS). Page 1 of 40 TABLE OF CONTENT I. REPORTS & POLLS .......................................................................................................... 6 AUSTRIA................................................................................................................................ 6 Antisemitic incidents in Austria up by more than 80% ........................................................... 6 FRANCE ................................................................................................................................. 6 Large dip in French Jewish emigration to Israel ..................................................................... 6 Huge fall in number of antisemitic attacks in France .............................................................. 6 Hate crimes in France down 80% this year ............................................................................. 7 Most French believe Jews responsible for rise in antisemitism................................................ 7 SPCJ statistics and analyses on antisemitism in France in 2015 .............................................. 7 More than 40% of French Jews considering “Aliyah”............................................................. 7 GERMANY ............................................................................................................................. 8 Germany to force Facebook,
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Health Technology Assessment in the European Union
    European on Health Systems and Policies ENSURING VALUE FOR MONEY IN HEALTH CARE The role of health technology assessment in the European Union Corinna Sorenson, Michael Drummond, Panos Kanavos Observatory Studies Series No 11 Ensuring value for money in health care The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies supports and promotes evidence- based health policy-making through comprehensive and rigorous analysis of health systems in Europe. It brings together a wide range of policy-makers, academics and practitioners to analyse trends in health reform, drawing on experience from across Europe to illuminate policy issues. The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies is a partnership between the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, the Governments of Belgium, Finland, Greece, Norway, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, the Veneto Region of Italy, the European Investment Bank, the Open Society Institute, the World Bank, the London School of Economics and Political Science and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Ensuring value for money in health care The role of health technology assessment in the European Union Corinna Sorenson Michael Drummond Panos Kanavos Keywords: TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL – organization and administration OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE) EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE DECISION MAKING COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS EUROPEAN UNION © World Health Organization 2008, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies All rights reserved. The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Address requests about publications to: Publications, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Scherfigsvej 8 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
    [Show full text]
  • I I I !
    c><^!^<c><><>e>e<><><><><>0<><^^ I 1 INDEX % 4 I I% i% I I I I I ! ! ! '5*3K>^00<><><><3><3><3><><><3><><^^ <^^^^^><^><^><£^><^^ Index Aascher, Abraham, 290 Aleman, Miguel, 201 Abbreviations, list of, 452 Alexander Kohut Memorial Foundation, Abdullah, King of Hashemite Jordan, 179, 454 405, 410 Algeria, 425, 432-34 Aberg, Einar, 62, 296 Ail-American Conference against Com- Abrahams, I., 269 munism, 84 Abrevaya, Dr., 303 Allgemeine Wochenzeitung der Juden in Academic Council for Hebrew Univer- Deutschland, 321 sity, 463 Alliance Israelite Universelle, 278, 387, Acheson, Dean, 116, 117, 375 412, 418, 420, 440, 428, 429, 430, Achron, Joseph, 186 431-32, 435 Actions Committee of the Labor Zionist Alliance Israelite Universelle, American Movement in Canada, 466 Friends of, 455 Actors' Equity Association, 60 Alliance Voice—Farband Shtimme, 485 Adato, Salomon, 302 Alpha Epsilon Phi Women's Fraternity, Adenauer, Konrad, 313, 319 459 Adler, Nettie, 250 Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity, 459 Adler, Robert, 186 Alpha Omega Fraternity, 459 Afghanistan, 406-07 Alpha Zeta Omega, 460 Africa, population, 197, 199 L'Amandier Fleuri, 280 Africa (see also North Africa, South Ambijan Bulletin, 335, 336 Africa) American Academy for Jewish Research, Aged, care of, 136-37, 156 Inc., 179, 454 ' Agudas Achim, 291 American Association of English-Jewish Agudas Israel World Organization, 444, Newspapers, 454 447, 448, 456 American Association for Jewish Educa- Agudath Israel of America, Inc., 87, 121, tion, 99, 109, 122, 456. 131, 456 American Association of School Ad- Agudath Israel of America, Inc. Chil- ministrators, 75 dren's Division—Pirchei Agudath American Association of University Israel, 456 Women, 81 Agudath Israel of America, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • In an Academic Voice: Antisemitism and Academy Bias Kenneth Lasson University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected]
    University of Baltimore Law ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law All Faculty Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 2011 In an Academic Voice: Antisemitism and Academy Bias Kenneth Lasson University of Baltimore School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/all_fac Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the First Amendment Commons Recommended Citation Kenneth Lasson, In an Academic Voice: Antisemitism and Academy Bias, 3 J. Study of Antisemitism 349 (2011). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@University of Baltimore School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. In an Academic Voice: Antisemitism and Academy Bias Kenneth Lasson* Current events and the recent literature strongly suggest that antisemitism and anti-Zionism are often conflated and can no longer be viewed as distinct phenomena. The following paper provides an overview of con- temporary media and scholarship concerning antisemitic/anti-Zionist events and rhetoric on college campuses. This analysis leads to the con- clusion that those who are naive about campus antisemitism should exer- cise greater vigilance and be more aggressive in confronting the problem. Key Words: Antisemitism, Higher Education, Israel, American Jews In America, Jews feel very comfortable, but there are islands of anti- Semitism: the American college campus. —Natan Sharansky1 While universities like to nurture the perception that they are protec- tors of reasoned discourse, and indeed often perceive themselves as sacro- sanct places of culture in a chaotic world, the modern campus is, of course, not quite so wonderful.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamie Stern-Weiner Tis Ebook Edition Published by Verso 2019
    anti-semitism and the labour party Anti-Semitism and the Labour Party Edited by Jamie Stern-Weiner Tis ebook edition published by Verso 2019 All rights reserved Te moral rights of the authors have been asserted Verso UK: 6 Meard St, London, W1F 0EG US: 20 Jay St, Suite 1010, Brooklyn, NY 11201 versobooks.com Verso is the imprint of New Lef Books ISBN-13: 978-1-78960-671-3 ‘Corbyn Under Fire’ and ‘Te Never Ending Story’, © Daniel Finn 2018, frst appeared in Jacobin. ‘Jeremy Corbyn is an Anti-Racist, Not an Anti-Semite’ © Jospehn Finlay, 2019, frst appeared in Times of Israel. 'Smoke Without Fire: Te Myth of the 'Labour Antisemitism Crisis’ © Jamie Stern-Weiner and Alan Maddison, 2019. ‘Te Chimera of British Anti-Semitism (and How Not to Fight It if it Were Real)’, frst appeared on Verso Blog © Norman Finkelstein, 2019; ’60 Times Jeremy Corbyn Stood with Jewish People’ © @ToryFibs; ‘Briefng for Canvassers: Challenging false allegations of antisemitism’ and ‘Te Riverside Scandal’ with permission from Jewish Voice for Labour; ‘A Disinformation Campaign’ © Media Reform Coalition, 2019; ‘Te Fake News Nazi: Corbyn, Williamson and the Anti-Semitism Scandal’ from Medians © David Edwards, 2019; ‘Is the Guardian Institutionally Antisemitic?’ and ‘Labour Party Conference or Nuremberg Rally? Assessing the Evidence’ from author’s blog, © Jamie Stern-Weiner 2019; ‘Hue and Cry over the UCU’ © Richard Kuper 2019; with permission of OpenDemocracy; ‘Why the Labour Party Should Not Adopt the IHRA Defnition or Any Other Defnition of Antisemitism’ from author’s
    [Show full text]
  • The Labour Party
    The Labour Party Head Office Southside, 105 Victoria Street, London SW1E 6QT Labour Central, Kings Manor, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 6PA 0345 092 2299 | labour.org.uk/contact Dr Moshe Machover, zzzzzzzzzzzz BY EMAIL ONLY: [email protected] 30 November 2020 Ref: L1627330 Case No: CN-4925 Dear Dr Machover, Notice of administrative suspension from membership of the Labour Party Allegations that you may have been involved in a breach of Labour Party rules have been brought to the attention of national officers of the Party. These allegations relate to your conduct online and offline which may be in breach of Chapter 2, Clause I.8 of the Labour Party Rule Book. It is important that these allegations are investigated and the NEC will be asked to authorise a full report to be drawn up with recommendations for disciplinary action if appropriate. We write to give you formal notice that it has been determined that the powers given to the NEC under Chapter 6 Clause I.1.A* of the Party’s rules should be invoked to administratively suspend you from membership of the Labour Party, pending the outcome of an internal Party investigation. The administrative suspension means that you cannot attend any Party meetings including meetings of your own branch, constituency, or annual conference; and you cannot be considered for selection as a candidate to represent the Labour Party at an election at any level**. In view of the urgency to protect the Party’s reputation in the present situation the General Secretary has determined to use powers delegated to him under Chapter 1 Clause VIII.5 of the rules to impose this suspension forthwith, subject to the approval of the next meeting of the NEC.
    [Show full text]