DOCSLIB.ORG

Twin Falls County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Twin Falls County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan TWIN FALLS COUNTY MULTI-JURISDICTION ALL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN AUGUST 2013 Twin Falls Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan August 23, 2013 Executive Summary The Twin Falls County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan 2013 is a complete revision of the 2008 Twin Falls County All Hazard Mitigation Plan. The entire Hazard and Vulnerability Assessment was updated. The hazard ranking was changed a new format deployed that ranks the hazards according to five indices, 1) historical occurrence, 2) probability, 3) vulnerability, 4) spatial extent, i.e, the extent impact based on geography, and 5) the magnitude which looks specifically at the loss of life, injuries, and economic impact. The Plan format was changed to match the FEMA Local Plan Crosswalk Guidance. The figure below contains the revised risk ranking for Twin Falls County. Historical Spatial Hazard Probability Vulnerability Magnitude Total Rank Occurrence Extent Drought 3 4 4 4 3 18 H Wildfire 3 4 2 3 4 16 H Severe Weather 3 4 3 3 3 16 H Severe Winter Storms 3 4 2 4 2 15 H Communicable 2 3 3 3 3 14 H Diseases Structural Fire 3 4 1 1 4 13 M H5N1 Bird Flu 0 1 4 4 4 13 M West Nile Virus 3 4 1 1 3 12 M Hazardous Materials 3 4 2 1 2 12 M Terrorism 0 1 4 3 4 12 M Vesicular Stomatitis 2 4 1 1 3 11 M Flood 2 4 1 1 3 11 M Flash Flood 2 4 2 1 2 11 M Canal Failure 2 4 1 1 2 10 M Lyme and Other Tick- 1 4 1 1 3 10 M Borne Diseases Nuclear Event 0 1 3 3 3 10 M Burrowing Rodents 1 4 1 1 2 9 L Earthquake 0 2 1 2 2 7 L Landslide 1 2 1 1 1 6 L Dam Failure 0 1 1 1 3 6 L The Twin Falls County Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Planning Project was led by Ms. Jackie Frey, Coordinator, Twin Falls County Department of Emergency Services, who, under the direction of the Twin Falls County Commissioners, is responsible for implementing the mitigation actions recommended in this Plan. 1 Twin Falls Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan August 23, 2013 The Twin Falls County All Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee was comprised of members of the Twin Falls County LEPC. Community involvement took two forms, 1) an electronic based community questionnaire, and 2) invitation to attend the local elected officials’ briefings. There was excellent community participation for a county of this size. While the focus of this Plan is on County-wide mitigation activities, it was developed through an integrated effort by representatives from many County jurisdictions. The following Cities and taxation districts have also participated in the development of this Plan: City of Buhl City of Castleford City of Filer City of Hansen City of Hollister City of Kimberly City of Murtaugh City of Twin Falls Buhl Highway District Filer Highway District Murtaugh Highway District Twin Falls Highway District Twin Falls County Pest Abatement District Twin Falls Canal Company Three Creek Rangeland Fire Protection Association, Inc. Saylor Creek Rangeland Fire Protection Association, Inc. Mitigation Actions have been reviewed and a status provided by the Mitigation Committee. Goals and Objectives, as developed in the initially planning process, were maintained and additional mitigation actions added to the Plan. The mitigation actions were reviewed and analyzed using the STAPLEE Method with each action given a H, M, or L ranking. Twin Falls County Projects STAPLEE Score Ranking Install High Wind Warning devices at the entrances of 150 H the Hansen and Perrine Snake River Bridge Organize a group to jointly apply for grants and other funding avenues to implement WUI Fire Mitigation 148.5 H Actions. Emergency Power for Relocation Centers 146 H Maintain the “Fight the Bite” program with the Health 144 H District. Develop an agreement with developers and private landowners for access to and use of water sources for 143 H fire protection. Incorporate new developments and structures into 142 H existing fire protection districts. 2 Twin Falls Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan August 23, 2013 Twin Falls County Projects STAPLEE Score Ranking Establish a National Flood Insurance Program for areas 139 M prone to flash flooding in Buhl and Castleford Develop an ordinance which establishes the road widths, access, water supply, and building regulations 136.5 M suitable to ensure new structures can be protected. Identify all Critical Infrastructure and Facilities in the County and participate with the new BHS Critical 132.5 M Infrastructure Protection Program. Develop a listing of roads, bridges, cattle guards, culverts, and other limiting conditions and incorporate 130 M improvements into the Highway District Transportation Plans. Develop a standard practice for roadside vegetation 126 M management in the Mellon Valley Area. Conduct a Hazardous Materials Commodity Flow 124.5 M Study for the County. Plant Wind Breaks along Highway 93 between 115 M Hollister and Rogerson Develop an ordinance that restricts building on the 107 L Snake River Canyon Rim. Post Evacuation Route Signs directing evacuees to 102 L Relocation Centers Work with the Idaho Department of Agriculture to develop protection measures for livestock from 99.5 L Biological Threats. Publish a special section in newspapers about the actual level of earthquake risk identified in the 2013 97.5 L update. Conduct a Law Enforcement Public Education 88 L Campaign on Civil Disobedience. The Plan as developed is much more user friendly, and designed specifically to enhanced implementation. The jurisdictions have completed many of the mitigation actions and as funding is available, additional mitigation actions will be addressed 3 Twin Falls Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan August 23, 2013 This Page Intentionally Blank 4 Twin Falls Multi-Jurisdiction All Hazard Mitigation Plan August 23, 2013 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................ 5 Section 1 Planning Process ............................................................................................................. 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 9 Participating Jurisdictions ......................................................................................................... 10 Twin Falls County All Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee .............................................. 11 AHMP Committee Meetings .................................................................................................... 13 Update Process .......................................................................................................................... 17 Participating Jurisdictions ......................................................................................................... 23 Public Meetings ........................................................................................................ 23 Stakeholder Participation .......................................................................................... 32 Participating Twin Falls County Public Safety Agencies ......................................... 32 Participating Taxation Districts ................................................................................ 36 Participating Private Entities..................................................................................... 37 Public Participation ................................................................................................................... 40 Public Questionnaire ................................................................................................................. 40 Continued Public Participation ................................................................................................. 43 Plan Monitoring and Review .................................................................................................... 43 Section 2 Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment ................................................................. 45 Section 2.1 Weather Hazards .................................................................................................... 46 Severe Weather ......................................................................................................... 46 Severe Winter Storms ............................................................................................... 62 Drought ..................................................................................................................... 68 Section 2.2 Flooding ................................................................................................................. 76 River or Stream Flooding.......................................................................................... 78 Flash Flood................................................................................................................ 80 Dam Failure .............................................................................................................. 84 Canal Failure ............................................................................................................. 89 Section 2.3 Geologic Hazards ................................................................................................... 94 Earthquake ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Photo Courtesy of Idaho Tourism Shoshone Falls
    PHOTO COURTESY OF IDAHO TOURISM SHOSHONE FALLS Located at the edge of Twin Falls, Shoshone Falls is a natural beauty on the Snake River. At 212 feet, the falls are higher than Niagara and put on a show in spring and early summer, when water flows are at their peak PHOTO COURTESY OF IDAHO TOURISM after winter snowmelt. During high water years, the falls attract thousands of out-of-town spectators who KNOW BEFORE come to witness nature’s awesome power. YOU GO: Shoshone Falls access Even when the falls aren’t at their peak, they’re still an is available from 7 a.m. to dusk. Entry fees are inspirational sight. Make a day — or even a weekend! $3 per car and $20 per — of it by taking advantage of the hiking trails, tour bus. Season passes are $25 and can be playgrounds, picnic areas, boat ramps, and swimming purchased at the holes that surround the falls. You can rent a stand-up park entrance. paddleboard from the AWOL Dive & Kayak stand and get an up-close view of Shoshone Falls from below — an experience that visitors say they’ll never forget. VISITSOUTHIDAHO.COM TWIN FALLS ©BLIPPRINTERS The city of Twin Falls took its name from these two waterfalls in the Snake River Canyon. So why is only one waterfall visible today? A dam along the Snake River, which uses water for hydroelectricity throughout the year, diverted water away from the second KNOW BEFORE waterfall. However, Twin Falls still remains a beautiful YOU GO: The best time to see landmark in spring and early summer, when thousands Twin Falls is from March upon thousands of gallons of water plummet 125 feet through early June, to the river below.
    [Show full text]
  • FMC Travel Club
    FMC Travel Club A subsidiary of Federated Mountain Clubs of New Zealand (Inc.) www.fmc.org.nz Club Convenor : John Dobbs Travel Smart Napier Civic Court, Dickens Street, Napier 4110 P: 06 8352222 F : 06 8354211 E : [email protected] 2nd July to 5th August 2016, 35 days $8995^^ San Francisco to San Francisco Leader : Phillip Donnell ^^ This is an estimated price only as at June 2015 An accurate price will be established once the 2015 trip has concluded and reviewed with any adjustments that need to be made Based on a minimum of 7 participants, and subject to currency fluctuations Any payments by Visa or Mastercard adds $250 PRICE INCLUDES : All accommodations – mix of hostels, cabins, lodges, motels etc inclusive of compulsory taxes Transports – hired minivan for the trip duration along with dedicated transport for other inclusions i.e. Alcatraz day trip, Lake Tahoe cruise and Silverton-Durango train excursion The services of a very experienced and knowledgeable Kiwi leader throughout, supported by an assistant if numbers warrant a second minivan 34 dinners and 34 breakfasts – includes many restaurant meals inclusive of compulsory tips National park fees and inclusions as indicated in the itinerary PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE : Flights to/from San Francisco Lunches Any optional activities or choices made within the itinerary Travel insurance Personal expenses outside of the inclusions Trip Leader Phillip Donnell lives in sunny Tauranga with his wife Katrina. He has three married children and eight grandchildren. He has been involved in outdoor activities for more than 40 years, leading hundreds of tramping expeditions in New Zealand and overseas, as well as extensive involvement in kayaking and mountain-biking.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (3-82) Exp. 10-31-84 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form Bee instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections____________________________________ 1. Name_____________________________ historic Milner Dam and the Twin Falls Main Canal and/or common___N/A______________________________________________________ 2. Location____________________________ street & number N/A_____________________________________N/A_ not for publication city, town Murtaugh JL vicinity of (see Verbal Boundary Description) state Idaho code 016 county S ee item 10 code see item 10 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district public occupied X agriculture museum building(s) X private AY unoccupied commercial park X structure (s) both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object N/A in process yes: restricted government scientific N_/A_ being considered X yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military 4. Owner of Property name_________Multiple ownership (see continuation sheet) street & number N/A city, town_______N/A______________N/A_ vicinity of______________state Idaho__________ 5. Location of Legal Description______________ courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. See continuation sheet_______________________________ street & number___________N/A______________________________________________ city, town_______________N/A__________________________state
    [Show full text]
  • Burley Field Office Business Plan Lud Drexler Park and Milner Historic Recreation Area
    U.S. Department of the Interior | Bureau of Land Management | Idaho Burley Field Office Business Plan Lud Drexler Park and Milner Historic Recreation Area June 2020 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Twin Falls District Burley Field Office 15 East 200 South Burley, ID 83318 Burley Field Office Business Plan Milner Historic Recreation Area and Lud Drexler Park I. Executive Summary The following document introduces a proposed fee increase by the Burley Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management for the recreation fee areas it manages in southern Idaho. The need for this action as well as the history of the fee program, expenses generated by the recreation sites and plans for future expenditures are outlined and explained in the pages below. The BLM Twin Falls District has two recreation fee sites, Milner Historic Recreation Area and Lud Drexler Park, both located in the Burley Field Office. The sites are the most popular recreation sites within the District hosting 40,000 plus people annually per site, with visits steadily increasing every year. This visitor increase along with aging infrastructure is contributing to resource damage and decreasing visitor safety and experiences, while budgets are stretched to keep up with maintenance and growing needs for improvements. Milner Historic Recreation Area The Milner Historic Recreation Area (MHRA) is situated along the Snake River, 9 miles west of Burley, Idaho. Both primitive and developed camp sites and boating facilities dot the 4.5-mile shoreline. The area’s basalt cliffs, sagebrush, and grasslands provide habitat to a variety of songbirds and waterfowl.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twin Falls Water Story: More Growth, Less Use
    The Twin Falls Water Story: More Growth, Less Use In 1746 among the pages of Poor Richard’s Almanac, Benjamin Franklin noted astutely, “When the well is dry, we know the worth of water.” Those who are intimately involved in city planning can agree it’s best to not wait until the well is dry before understanding the many ways water sustains industry, commerce and the well-being of a population. The City of Twin Falls, Idaho, has made water management a priority for decades. As a result, groundwater consumption has gone down even as their population growth continues at a steady pace. The History of Twin Falls Water When exploring the dozens of waterfalls in the Magic Valley including the sprawling, thundering Shoshone Falls, it’s difficult to imagine the area as a parched desert. “The building of Milner Dam around 1900 is really what brought the City of Twin Falls to life,” said Brian Olmstead, general manager of the Twin Falls Canal Company. “It turned what was once a desert into the rich farmland that it is now.” The implementation of the Milner Dam and the subsequent canal system were an early result of the Carey Act of 1894. Also known as the Federal Desert Land Act, the act promoted cooperative ventures with private companies to establish irrigation systems that would allow large areas of semi-arid federal land to become agriculturally productive. The Milner Dam project provided water to nearly 200,000 acres on the south side of the Snake River. “The initial setup included irrigation shares and ditches that flowed to nearly every lot in town until about the 1960s,” Olmstead said.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the 1984 Swan Falls Settlement
    UNDERSTANDING THE 1984 SWAN FALLS SETTLEMENT CLIVE J. STRONG & MICHAEL C. ORR FULL CITATION: Clive J. Strong & Michael C. Orr, Understanding the 1984 Swan Falls Settlement, 52 IDAHO L. REV. 223 (2016). This article Copyright © 2016 Idaho Law Review. Except as otherwise expressly provided, permission is hereby granted to photocopy this article for classroom use, provided that: (1) Copies are distributed at or below cost; (2) The author of the article and the Idaho Law Review are properly identified; (3) Proper notice of the copyright is affixed to each copy; and (4) Notice of the use is given to the Idaho Law Review. UNDERSTANDING THE 1984 SWAN FALLS SETTLEMENT CLIVE J. STRONG & MICHAEL C. ORR TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 224 II. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 226 III. THE SWAN FALLS CONTROVERSY AND SETTLEMENT ....................... 230 A. The Lawsuits ............................................................................................ 231 B. The Legislative Subordination Battle ....................................................... 234 C. The Negotiations ...................................................................................... 235 D. The Settlement “Framework” ................................................................... 237 E. The “Trust” Concept ................................................................................. 239
    [Show full text]
  • Snake River Flow Augmentation Impact Analysis Appendix
    SNAKE RIVER FLOW AUGMENTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX Prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Walla Walla District’s Lower Snake River Juvenile Salmon Migration Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Statement United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Region Boise, Idaho February 1999 Acronyms and Abbreviations (Includes some common acronyms and abbreviations that may not appear in this document) 1427i A scenario in this analysis that provides up to 1,427,000 acre-feet of flow augmentation with large drawdown of Reclamation reservoirs. 1427r A scenario in this analysis that provides up to 1,427,000 acre-feet of flow augmentation with reservoir elevations maintained near current levels. BA Biological assessment BEA Bureau of Economic Analysis (U.S. Department of Commerce) BETTER Box Exchange Transport Temperature Ecology Reservoir (a water quality model) BIA Bureau of Indian Affairs BID Burley Irrigation District BIOP Biological opinion BLM Bureau of Land Management B.P. Before present BPA Bonneville Power Administration CES Conservation Extension Service cfs Cubic feet per second Corps U.S. Army Corps of Engineers CRFMP Columbia River Fish Mitigation Program CRP Conservation Reserve Program CVPIA Central Valley Project Improvement Act CWA Clean Water Act DO Dissolved Oxygen Acronyms and Abbreviations (Includes some common acronyms and abbreviations that may not appear in this document) DREW Drawdown Regional Economic Workgroup DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane EIS Environmental Impact Statement EP Effective Precipitation EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act ETAW Evapotranspiration of Applied Water FCRPS Federal Columbia River Power System FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission FIRE Finance, investment, and real estate HCNRA Hells Canyon National Recreation Area HUC Hydrologic unit code I.C.
    [Show full text]
  • County Comprehensive Plan
    JEROME COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Revised 11/13/2015 Section Page I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1 A. Setting ................................................................................................................................1 B. Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................2 C. Private Property Rights ......................................................................................................4 D. Plan Structure ....................................................................................................................6 E. Plan Adoption and Review ................................................................................................8 II. Population ....................................................................................................................................9 A. Existing Conditions ...........................................................................................................9 1. 1990 Census Characteristics ...................................................................................10 a. Geographic Distribution ..............................................................................10 b. Age ..............................................................................................................10 c. Race and Hispanic Origin ...........................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Quality Assessment of the Upper Snake River Basin, Idaho and Western Wyoming Environmental Setting, 1980-92
    WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE UPPER SNAKE RIVER BASIN, IDAHO AND WESTERN WYOMING ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, 1980-92 By MOLLY A. MAUPIN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4221 Boise, Idaho 1995 FOREWORD The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey Describe how water quality is changing over time. (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the Improve understanding of the primary natural and earth resources of the Nation and to provide informa­ human factors that affect water-quality conditions. tion that will assist resource managers and policymak- ers at Federal, State, and local levels in making sound This information will help support the develop­ decisions. Assessment of water-quality conditions and ment and evaluation of management, regulatory, and trends is an important part of this overall mission. monitoring decisions by other Federal, State, and local agencies to protect, use, and enhance water resources. One of the greatest challenges faced by water- resources scientists is acquiring reliable information The goals of the NAWQA Program are being that will guide the use and protection of the Nation's achieved through ongoing and proposed investigations water resources. That challenge is being addressed by of 60 of the Nation's most important river basins and Federal, State, interstate, and local water-resource aquifer systems, which are referred to as study units. agencies and by many academic institutions. These These study units are distributed throughout the Nation organizations are collecting water-quality data for a and cover a diversity of hydrogeologic settings. More host of purposes that include: compliance with permits than two-thirds of the Nation's freshwater use occurs and water-supply standards; development of remedia­ within the 60 study units and more than two-thirds of tion plans for a specific contamination problem; opera­ the people served by public water-supply systems live tional decisions on industrial, wastewater, or water- within their boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Secrets of the Magic Valley • the Devi I'5 Backbone •
    102 Secrets of the Magic Valley • The Devi I'5 Backbone • The Devi 104 Secrets of the Magic Valley "Strait is the gate and narrow is the way which leadeth unto life," wrote Applegate in 1914, near death and quoting from Scripture. "Wide is the gate and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction. But this Devil's Backbone was worse than either, for it was both narrow and crooked, and it was hard to tell where it might lead to. " Often the road beyond Hagerman led to a West of graver hazards; it led, in Applegate's recollections, to a swollen ford of the Snake at Three Islands, a scaffoldlike tomb of hanging corpses near Fort Boise, a near-fatal fall under a wagon wheel in Oregon's Malheur Desert, a rock-and-spear­ throwing brawl with Indian youths outside Fort Walla Walla, an early snowfall in the Blue Mountains, and then calamity at The Dalles of the Columbia where a skiff disappeared in a whirlpool, killing three Shrouded in lore and idealization, the trai I led also to myth. Oregon in the 1840s was national wish fulfillment. God's Country A window on the Pacific. A pastoral Eden beyond the Indian country where righteous yeomen staked claim to the ferti le Northwest. "Oregon," said the Alton Telegraph, "would contribute to our national honor. " It w ould "connect the North with the South, Narrow and steep, the and the East with the West, so firmly well-rutted Devil's that nothing but the power of Backbone led to a west of graver I1dzards.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Special Sites
    JEROME COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I 2018 Chapter 3 HISTORY AND SPECIAL SITES Jerome County has a rich heritage. This legacy is evident in a variety of special sites, including: Oregon Trail ruts and the Wilson Butte Cave--a world known archeological site. The enjoyment and protection of these special sites will be through environmentally responsible management. The National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) is an official list of the Nation’s historic places generated by the National Park Service. The NRHP can be found at https://npgallery.nps.gov/nrhp. Indeed, the County’s history has shaped the form and design of its landscape. This component concerns itself with Jerome County's identity and the design features that present an attractive appearance for the County. A brief background on the County’s formation and a presentation of the existing condition of special sites, as well as future potentials of various sites, are presented in this chapter. Special areas of Jerome County include the individual cities of Jerome, Eden, and Hazelton—as well as the Snake River Canyon, the public lands of the BLM, and Interstate-84 interchanges and highway corridors. Information on the cities of the County are located in the individual city comprehensive- plan documents. The significant landscapes of the Snake River Canyon are reviewed in Chapter 11: Parks, Recreation, and Tourism. The BLM oversees most natural resource management activities and establishes management standards for the federal land in Jerome County. The State of Idaho Department of Lands oversees and manages state land in Jerome County. BACKGROUND Jerome County was created by the Idaho Legislature on February 8, 1919--taking parts of Lincoln, Gooding, and Minidoka counties.
    [Show full text]
  • All Hazard Mitigation Plan Twin Falls County, Idaho
    2008 TWIN FALLS COUNTY ALL HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN OCTOBER 15, 2008 Preface The Twin Falls County All Hazard Mitigation Plan was developed in late fall of 2006 through the spring of 2008. It contains information pertaining to the hazards and hazard vulnerabilities faced by Twin Falls County. This Plan is designed to interface with the State of Idaho Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan published in November 2004 and updated in November 2007. This Plan has been developed as the Twin Falls County All Hazards Mitigation Plan (AHMP) however; the Plan was developed by an integrated effort from representatives from many of the jurisdictions in Twin Falls County. Each City will therefore be asked to endorse the AHMP and in turn participate in implementation of the Plan as it applies to the hazards in their respective jurisdictions. Further updates of this Plan will seek to increase multi-jurisdiction involvement. Twin Falls 1 All Hazard Mitigation Plan October 15, 2008 This Page Intentionally Blank Twin Falls 2 All Hazard Mitigation Plan October 15, 2008 Twin Falls 3 All Hazard Mitigation Plan October 15, 2008 This Page Intentionally Blank Twin Falls 4 All Hazard Mitigation Plan October 15, 2008 Twin Falls 5 All Hazard Mitigation Plan October 15, 2008 This Page Intentionally Blank Twin Falls 6 All Hazard Mitigation Plan October 15, 2008 This Page Intentionally Blank Twin Falls 7 All Hazard Mitigation Plan October 15, 2008 This Page Intentionally Blank Twin Falls 8 All Hazard Mitigation Plan October 15, 2008 Twin Falls 9 All Hazard Mitigation Plan October
    [Show full text]