Fordham Law Review Volume 77 Issue 4 Article 20 2009 The Lawyer's Role in a Contemporary Democracy, Tensions Between Various Conceptions of the Lawyer's Role, Lawyering at the Extremes: The Representation of Tom Mooney, 1916-1939 Rebecca Roiphe Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Rebecca Roiphe, The Lawyer's Role in a Contemporary Democracy, Tensions Between Various Conceptions of the Lawyer's Role, Lawyering at the Extremes: The Representation of Tom Mooney, 1916-1939, 77 Fordham L. Rev. 1731 (2009). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol77/iss4/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. The Lawyer's Role in a Contemporary Democracy, Tensions Between Various Conceptions of the Lawyer's Role, Lawyering at the Extremes: The Representation of Tom Mooney, 1916-1939 Cover Page Footnote Associate Professor of Law, New York Law School; J.D., 2000, Harvard Law School; Ph.D, 2002, University of Chicago. I am grateful to Molly Beutz, Doni Gewirtzman, James Grimmelmann, and Benjamin Gruenstein for their thoughtful comments on earlier drafts. This article is available in Fordham Law Review: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol77/iss4/20 LAWYERING AT THE EXTREMES: THE REPRESENTATION OF TOM MOONEY, 1916-1939 Rebecca Roiphe* INTRODUCTION In 1916, America, unhinged by its own labor disputes, fought bitterly over the question of whether to enter the war in Europe.' At a prowar rally in San Francisco, the two issues (which were never completely separate) collided when a bomb went off, killing nine people and wounding many others.