Boctor of $Litlo^Qpl)P in WILDLIFE SCIENCE

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boctor of $Litlo^Qpl)P in WILDLIFE SCIENCE STATUS, DISTRIBUTION AND SOME ASPECTS OF ECOLOGY OF CHEER PHEASANT Catreus wallichii IN HIMACHAL PRADESH, INDIA ABSTRACT THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF Boctor of $litlo^Qpl)P IN WILDLIFE SCIENCE BY JUNID NAZEER SHAH DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE SCIENCES ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY ALIGARH (INDIA) 2004 3 ! B is H T ABSTRACT The pheasants have been associated with the mankind since times immoral. They are known as game birds as they are hunted for sport as well as pot. They constitute most distinctive family of bird of the Himalayas and have most fascinating, spectacular and gorgeously plumaged birds of the world. The family phasianidae comprises of a group of 49 species of generally non-migratory and terrestrially adapted birds of moderately large size of which 17 species are found in India. There are seven species of pheasants found in Himachal Pradesh out of which two species have been put under threat category. There is lack of detailed ecological information on Cheer pheasant in Himachal pradesh. The study was taken to look at the status, distribution and some aspects of ecology of the Cheer pheasant. The study was conducted in Majathal-Harsang Wildlife Sanctuary of of 39 km2 area. The sanctuary lies to northwest of Shimla in the catchment of River Sutlej, situated in the districts of Shimla and Solan. The basic vegetation in the study area was classified as Chir pine Pinus roxburghii and Ban Oak Quercus lecotrichophora categories. The habitat was categorized into seven-habitat categories - a) Dense pine, b) Open pine, c) Oak. d) Scrub, e) Grassland, f] Degraded, g) Cultivation. The study was conducted for three seasons for two constitutive years, while call counts were done for three constitutive years. To find the status of Cheer pheasant, call counts were done at the cheer calling sites in the sanctuary. The mean density of cheer over the years was 5.612 ± 0.453 calling positions per square kilometer. The mean calling density in year 1999 was 3.289 ± 0.730 calling positions per square kilometer, while in year 2000 it was 4.448 i 0.560 calling positions per square kilometer and in year 2001 it was 5.162 ± 0.453 calling positions per square kilometer. The mean density index varied significantly across the years (F= 14.547, df =2, p < 0.01, One-way ANOVA). The mean density index in the month of April was 2.551 ± 0.808 calling positions per square kilometer, while in the month of May it was 8.241 ± 0.590 calling positions per square kilometer and in the month of June it was 4.034 ± 0.749 calling positions per square kilometer. The mean calling positions varied significantly across the months (F= 17.082, df = 2, p <0.01, One-way ANOVA). Six cheer sites were monitored for three years. Six new cheer sites were found in and around the protected area. One cheer site, Matrech was situated in the jurisdiction of Bilaspur district. There were no significant differences in the density indices at these new sites (F= 1.39, df = 5, p = 0.246, One-way ANOVA). The calling frequency at dawn varied from 44 to 75 % in the year 2000, while it varied from 22 % to 77 % in the year 2001. The calling frequency varied significantly across the months in year 2000 (F= 10.16, df = 2, p<0.05. One-way ANOVA) and also varied significantly in year 2001 (F= 30.81, df = 2, p <0.05, One-way ANOVA). At dusk, the calling frequency varied from 32 to 90 % in year 2000 and in it year 2001 it varied from 22 to 75 %. The calling frequency varied significantly across the months in year 2000 (F= 47.78, df = 2, p , 0.05, One-way ANOVA) and it also varied significantly across the months on the year 2001 (F=23.48, df = 2, One-way ANOVA). The birds were more vocal in the month of May in both the years and same at dawn as well as dusk. The mean duration of calling at dawn in year 2000 was 5.08 minutes (± S. E. 0.32). In the month of April, it was 2.12 minutes (± S.E. 0.24) while in the month of May it was 8.42 minutes (± S.E. 1.01) and in the month of June it was 2.15 minutes (± S.E. 0.32). The mean duration of calling varied across the months (F= 21.830, df =2, p <0.05, One­ way ANOVA). The mean duration of calling at dawn in year 2001 was 6.15 minutes (± S.E. 0.22). The mean duration of calling in at dawn in the month of April was 2.37 minutes (± S.E. 0.41), while the duration of calling in the month of May was 7.56 minutes (± S.E. 0.32) and in the month of June it was 6.35 minutes (± S.E. 0.36). The mean duration of calling varied across the months (F= 19.28, df = 2, p < 0.05, One-way ANOVA). The mean duration of calling at dusk in year 2000 was 4.16 minutes (± S.E. 0.20). The mean calling duration in the month of April was 3.12 minutes (± S.E. 0.35) while in the month of May it was 6.47 minutes (± S.E. 0.32) and the mean calling duration in the month of June was 1.07 minutes (± S.E. 0.20). The mean duration of calling at dusk varied significantly across the months (F=32.84, df = 2, p < 0.05, One-way ANOVA). The mean calling duration at dusk in the year 2001 was 3.10 minutes (± S.E. 0.16). The mean duration of calling in the month of April was 1.44 minutes (± S.E. 0.32) while in the month of May it was 4.30 (± S.E. 0.27 (and in the month of June it was 2.53 minutes (± S.E. 0.16). The mean duration of the calling varied significantly across the months (F = 9.62, df = 2, p < 0.05, One-way ANOVA). The duration of calling was longest in the month of May in both the years. The mean number of calls at dawn in year 2000 was 29.19 calls per calling day (± S.E. 1.65). The mean number of calls in the month of April was 21.07 calls per calling day (± S.E. 2.80) while in the month of May it was 44.2 calls per calling day (± S.E. 2.05) and in the month of June was 11.49 calls per calling day (± S.E. 1.94). The mean number of calls varied significantly across the months (F = 59.34, df- 2, p < 0.05, One-way ANOVA). In year 2001, at dawn, the mean number of calls was 32.60 calls per calling day (± S.E. 1.28). The mean number of calls in the month of April was 10.57 (± S.E. 1.28) per calling day, while in the month of May it was 43.68 (± S.E. 1.47) calls per calling day and in the month of June it was 33.32 (± S.E. 1.99) calls per calling day. The number of calls varied significantly across the months (F = 82.01, df = 2, p < 0.05, One-way ANOVA). The number of calls was maximum in the month of May in both the years. The mean numbers of calls at dusk in year 2000 were 18.09 (± S.E. 1.05) calls per calling day. The mean number of calls in the April was 13.35 calls (± S.E. 1.88) per calling day while in the month of May it was 29.14 calls (± S.E. 0.89) and in the month of June it was 4.37 (± S.E. 0.89) calls per calling day. The mean number of calls varied significantly across the months (F = 106.76, df = 2, p < 0.05, One-way ANOVA). In year 2001 the mean number of calls was 23.74 calls (± S.E. 1.30) per calling day. The mean number of calls in the month of April was 10.55 calls (± S.E. 2.04) per calling day, while in the month of May mean number of calls were 34.70 (± S.E. 1.67) per calling day and in June mean number of calls was 22.68 (± S.E. 2.17) calls per calling day. The mean number of calls varied significantly across the months (F = 38.41, df = 2, p < 0.05, One-way ANOVA). The mean number of calls was highest in the month of May in both the years. Sightings of Cheer pheasant in different habitat types was used to work out the habitat use pattern of this species in the area. At each bird plot both landscape and microhabitat variables were collected. To determine which particular habitat had been utilized by Cheer pheasant more or less than expected in proportion to its availability, Bonferoni 95% confidence intervals were used. Overall Cheer utilized open-pine , scrub and grassland were utilized more then the expected while oak, degraded and cultivation were utilized less then the expected. The seasonal sightings of cheer differed in different habitats. Scrub and grassland were utilized more then the expected in the post-breeding season, while dense-pine, oak, degraded and cultivation was utilized less then the excepted in this season. In winter season, dense-pine and open-pine was utilized more then the expected, while oak, cultivation and degraded were utilized less then the expected.
Recommended publications
  • A Comparative Study on the Populations and Habitats of the Grey Francolin Francolinus Pondicerianus and the Black Francolin Fran
    Populations and habitats of Grey and Black Francolins in Pakistan – S. Mahmood et al. A Comparative Study on the Populations and Habitats of the Grey Francolin Francolinus pondicerianus and the Black Francolin Francolinus francolinus in Lehri Nature Park, Punjab, Pakistan SAJID MAHMOOD1, TARIQ MAHMOOD1*, MUHAMMAD RAIS1, IRFAN ZIA 2 3 QURESHI & MUHAMMAD SAJID NADEEM 1. Department of Wildlife Management, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi 46300, PAKISTAN. 2. Department of Animal Sciences, Quaid-I-Azam University Islamabad, PAKISTAN 3. Department of Zoology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, 46300, PAKISTAN. * Correspondence Author. Email: [email protected] Received 28 April 2010; accepted 7 September 2010 Abstract: The population and habitat preferences of the Grey Francolin Francolinus pondicerianus and Black Francolin Francolinus francolinus were studied in three different habitats in Lehri Nature Park, Jhelum, Pakistan. The populations of the two species were estimated using direct (Line transect method) and indirect methods (“calls” of the two species). Data were collected monthly from September 2008 to July 2009. The results showed average population densities of 0.47±0.09/ha and 0.06±0.01/ha for Grey and Black Francolin, respectively. A noticeably higher population was found in the morning compared to that of the evening. Maximum densities at both morning and evening were found in October 2008 with significant differences (P<0.01). Maximum seasonal populations were recorded during autumn 2008 - 0.76±0.26/ha and 0.07±0.02/ha for Grey and Black Francolins, respectively. For an assessment of the habitat preferences of the two species, relative density, relative frequency and relative dominance were calculated for trees, shrubs and herbs species in the three selected habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Assessment Evaluation of the Field Efficacy Of
    Draft Environmental Assessment Evaluation of the field efficacy of broadcast application of two rodenticides (diphacinone, chlorophacinone) to control mice (Mus musculus) in native Hawaiian conservation areas Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office (PIFWO), Region 1 Cooperating Agencies: USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC), Hilo, Hawai’i; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Migratory Birds and Habitat Program, Pacific Region BACKGROUND In keeping with its mission, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is striving to recover and restore native species and their habitats in Hawai’i. To achieve this goal it is necessary to remove invasive rodents, including mice, from large geographic areas within the state. However, some of the scientific information needed to support removal of mice from the natural environment is currently lacking. Therefore, the Service, in cooperation with the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC) are proposing to conduct a study at the U.S. Army Garrison, Pōhakuloa Training Area, Hawai’i to determine the response of mice to different application rates of two rodenticides: diphacinone and chlorophacinone. The Service would provide the funding for the proposed project and the NWRC would conduct the proposed study. Currently, diphacinone is the only rodenticide labeled for conservation purposes in Hawai’i. The information from the study would, if warranted by results, also be used to pursue registration for a conservation label from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for chlorophacinone. Invasive1 house mice (Mus musculus) are abundant and widespread in Hawaiian ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • Captive Breeding and Reintroduction of Black Francolin, Grey Francolin and Chukar Partridge (2015-2020) in District Dir Lower, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
    CAPTIVE BREEDING AND REINTRODUCTION OF BLACK FRANCOLIN, GREY FRANCOLIN AND CHUKAR PARTRIDGE (2015-2020) IN DISTRICT DIR LOWER, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PAKISTAN Syed Fazal Baqi Kakakhel Naveed Ul Haq Ejaz Ul Haq European Journal of Biology Vol.5, Issue 2, pp 1-9, 2020 CAPTIVE BREEDING AND REINTRODUCTION OF BLACK FRANCOLIN, GREY FRANCOLIN AND CHUKAR PARTRIDGE (2015-2020) IN DISTRICT DIR LOWER, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PAKISTAN Syed Fazal Baqi Kakakhel¹*, Naveed Ul Haq², Ejaz Ul Haq³ ¹Conservator Wildlife Northern Circle Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Wildlife Department, Pakistan ²Deputy Conservator Wildlife Dir Wildlife Division Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Wildlife Department, Pakistan ³Sub Divisional Wildlife officer Dir Lower Wildlife Sub Division, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Wildlife Department Pakistan *Crresponding Author’s E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Purpose: The ex-situ conservation aims to discover new populations or supports the populations that yet survive in the wild. To breed animals in captivity and release them in their natural control habitats is one of the conservation methods. Amongst other species partridges also breed in captivity and can be release in the wild but presently data lacking, need to examine. Chukar partridge, Black francolin and Grey francolin are used for sports hunting in Pakistan. The available record on captive breeding of Chukar partridge, Black francolin and Grey francilin and their release in the wild for the years 2015-2020 was reviewed using a developed questionnaire. Methodology: Review record of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Wildlife Department Pakistan through a developed questionnaire Findings: It was found that the maximum number of chukar partridge breed was 36, Black francolin (6) and Grey francolin (24). Out of the breeding stock, Chukar partridges (44) and Grey francolin (28) were released in the wild to its natural habitat by hard release technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Online First Article Diversity and Abundance of Avifauna of Manglot Wildlife Park, Nowshera District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
    Pakistan J. Zool., pp 1-8, 2021. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20191101061139 Diversity and abundance of Avifauna of Manglot Wildlife Park, Nowshera District, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan Tariq Mahmood1*, Luqman Ullah Khan1 and Muhammad Naeem2 1Department of Wildlife Management, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan 2Department of Entomology, PMAS Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi 46300, Pakistan ABSTRACT Article Information Received 01 November 2019 Comprising about 13% of the world avian diversity, Indian sub-continent has approximately more than Revised 03 February 2020 2060 species of birds. In Pakistan, there are more or less 660 bird species belonging to 23 orders and Accepted 20 February 2020 74 families. The abundance and diversity of avian species in a specific habitat can serve as a useful Available online 11 September 2020 measure of their ecological status. In response to land use changes, 20-25% of pre-agricultural birds Authors’ Contribution have vanished. In the current study, we documented diversity and abundance of the avifauna occurring TM and LUK designed and planned at Manglot Wildlife Park, District Nowhere, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan from September 2017 to the study. LUK collected the field data. July 2018. Data were collected fortnightly applying Point Count Method. Visits to the study area were TM wrote the manuscript. FA and MN made in the morning (6:30 am to 9:30 am) and in the evening (3:30 pm to 6:30 pm). Results showed a analyzed the data. total of 51 bird species belonging to 10 orders and 27 families inhabiting the study area, including both summer and winter visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Food of Grey Francolin (Francolinus Pondicerianus Interpositus) With
    Pakistan J. Zool., vol. 44(4), pp. 1099-1109, 2012. Food of Grey Francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus interpositus) with Remarks on Competition with Black Francolin (Francolinus francolinus henrici) in Lal Suhanra National Park (Pakistan)* Waseem Ahmad Khan1 and Afsar Mian2 1F.G. Postgraduate College (Men), H-8, Islamabad 2Bioresource Research Centre, Islamabad Abstract.- Analyses of 31 crop contents of grey francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus interpositus) collected from Lal Suhanra National Park (Punjab, Pakistan) during different seasons (spring 7, summer 9, autumn 7, winter 8) contained 51 (35 plants, 16 insects) taxa, demonstrating the omnivorous and food generalist character of this species. The food was comprised of seeds (44%), leaves (7%), insects (34%), grit (11%) and unidentified material (5%). Relative representation of all food taxa remained low (>7%). Seeds were more frequent in autumn (49%) and winter (51 %) compared to spring (37%) and summer 40%), insects were in lower proportions in autumn (27%) and winter (28%) than in spring (40%) and summer (38%), and leaves were slightly higher in spring (9%) and summer (10%) than in autumn (5%) and winter (4%). Grit formed 11% of average content and exhibited significant positive regression with seed and significant negative regression with leaves and insects. Comparison of food of grey and black (F. francolinus henrici) francolins suggested similarity in types of food consumed with a group of 29 (22 plant, 7 animal) taxa consumed by both. However, 17 taxa (12 plants, 5 animals) were consumed exclusively by black francolin; and 23 (14 plants, 9 animals) were exclusively consumed by grey francolin, suggesting that these sympatric species avoid food competition under the Gause Principle.
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Bangladesh 2015
    Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt.
    [Show full text]
  • Francolinus Pondicerianus) in SALT
    HABITAT PREFERENCE AND BREEDING BIOLOGY OF GREY FRANCOLIN (Francolinus pondicerianus) IN SALT RANGE, PUNJAB SANGAM KHALIL 05-arid-334 Department of Wildlife Management Faculty of Forestry, Range Management and Wildlife Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan 2015 HABITAT PREFERENCE AND BREEDING BIOLOGY OF GREY FRANCOLIN (Francolinus pondicerianus) IN SALT RANGE, PUNJAB by SANGAM KHALIL (05-arid-334) A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Wildlife Management Department of Wildlife Management Faculty of Forestry, Range Management and Wildlife Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, Pakistan 2015 CERTIFICATION I hereby undertake that this research is an original one and no part of this thesis falls under plagiarism. If found otherwise, at any stage, I will be responsible for the consequences. Student Name: Sangam Khalil Signature: _______________ Registration No: 05-arid-334 Date: ________________ Certified that contents and form of thesis entitled “Habitat Preference and Breeding Biology of Grey Francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus) in Salt Range, Punjab” submitted by Sangam Khalil have been found satisfactory for the requirement of degree. Supervisor: ___________________________ (Prof. Dr. Maqsood Anwar) Member: _____________________________ (Prof. Dr. Iftikhar Hussain) Member: ____________________________ (Dr. Rahmat Ullah Qureshi) Chairman: _________________________ Dean, FRW: __________________________ Director Advanced Studies: __________________________ CONTENTS Page List of Tables vii List of Figures x List of Plates xiv List of Abbreviations xvi ACKNOWLEDEMENTS xviii ABSTRACT xx 1. INTRODUCTON 1 1.1 .GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1 1.2. ECOLOGY OF GREY FRANCOLIN 2 1.3. OBJECTIVES 9 2. REVIEW OF LITERATURE 10 2.1. HABITAT 10 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • In District Bhakkar, Punjab, Pakistan
    Pakistan J. Zool., pp 1-7, 2021. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.pjz/20191201141217 Impact of Feeding Habits on Population Ecology and Breeding Biology of Grey Francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus) in District Bhakkar, Punjab, Pakistan Aftab Raza Khan1, Azhar Abbas Khan2*, Javed Iqbal3, Arif Muhammad Khan4, Zeshan Hassan2, Hafiz Muhammad Aatif2 and Umbreen Shahzad2 1Department of Biological Sciences, Government Post Graduate College, Bhakkar, Pakistan. 2College of Agriculture, Bahauddin Zakariyya University, Bahadur Campus Layyah, Pakistan. 3Department of Biological Sciences, Government Degree College, Mankera, Pakistan. 4 Department of Biotechnology, University of Sargodha Main-Campus, Sargodha, Article Information Pakistan. Received 01 December 2019 Revised 22 May 2020 Accepted 07 July 2020 ABSTRACT Available online 14 January 2021 Human-mediated wildlife reshuffling has raised concerns over the conservation of insects and predatory Authors’ Contribution ARK performed the experiment, data birds. Globally the population of grey francolin Francolinus pondicerianus is the Least Concern in the analysis, wrote the manuscript. AAK Red List of Endangered Species of Fauna and Flora of the International Union for Conservation of Nature conceived and designed the study and (IUCN). However, its population has been significantly reduced in the desert ecosystem of Bhakkar wrote the manuscript. JI and AMK, (Punjab) Pakistan. The study was conducted to study the population ecology and breeding biology in conceived and designed the study, relation to feeding habits of grey francolin in 16 different stands in Bhakkar, Punjab, Pakistan. The line edited manuscript. ZH, HMA and transect data suggested grey francolin presence in 15 out of 16 stands (93.75%). An average density of US, formal data analysis, edited the grey francolins 13.01±6.39/km2 varying between 0.30±0.23 and 1.97±0.65/ km2 was recorded in different manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of Grey Francolin (Francolinus Pondicerianus) in Salt Range, Pakistan
    Pakistan J. Zool., vol. 48(1), pp. 115-123, 2016. Breeding Biology of Grey Francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus) in Salt Range, Pakistan Sangam Khalil,* Maqsood Anwar and Iftikhar Hussain Department of Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry, Range Management and Wildlife, Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Murree Road, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan A B S T R A C T Present study documented some aspects of breeding biology of grey francolin (Francolinus Article Information pondicerianus) such as breeding season, nest structure, clutch size, incubation period and hatching Received 27 July 2013 success in the Salt Range of Punjab, one of important area of grey francolin distribution in Pakistan. Revised 19 September 2015 Breeding season of grey francolin in the study area extended from mid March to end of July. All of Accepted 6 October 2015 its nests located during the study were found on the ground in natural vegetation consisting of Available online 1 January 2016 Acacia modesta, Acacia nilotica, Ziziphus mauritiana, Dalbergia sissoo, Desmostachia bipinnata Authors’ Contributions and Cynodon dactylon. Egg laying occurred mainly in the months of April and May, having mean SK, MA, IH conceived and designed egg laying span of 12.1±1.20 days (range 7-18 days) and a mean clutch size of 6.8±0.78 eggs per the experiment. SK, MA performed nest (range 4-12). Mean incubation period was 15.7±1.86 days (range 13-20 days). Out of a total of the experiments and analyzed the 68 eggs located in various nests, 53 hatched (74.80%) with a mean hatching rate of 5.3±0.85 eggs data.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial D-Loop Based Genetic Characterization of Two Francolin Species from a Part of Himalayan Foothills
    Asian Journal of Conservation Biology, July 2020. Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 107-112 AJCB: FP0127 ISSN 2278-7666 ©TCRP Foundation 2020 Mitochondrial D-loop based genetic characterization of two Francolin species from a part of Himalayan foothills Anand Kumar* and Dinesh Kumar Sharma Department of Zoology, HNB Garhwal University, SRT Campus, Badshahithaul, New Tehri, Uttarakhand, India (Received: February 14, 2020; Revised: April 10, 2020 ; Accepted: May 15 , 2020) ABSTRACT Genus Francolinus under the family Phasianideae of order Galliformes are important group of birds and among the largest genera in the class Aves, distributed throughout the world and occupying different habitats. This group has several IUCN red listed species undergoing population fragmentation, decline and habitat loss. So far only two species of genus Francolinus viz., Asian Black francolin (Francolinus francolinus asiae) and the North Indian Grey francolin (Francolinus pondicerianus interpositus) have been reported from Uttarakhand. Here we have characterized genetic-make up of these francolins using mitochondrial DNA marker i.e. D-loop or Control region. The genetic polymorphism pattern of the mitochondrial control region in Black and grey francolin, is described for the North Western Himalayan population in order to get some base line data about genetic diversity, possible population structure and demographic dynamics. Key words: Galliformes, Uttarakhand, mitochondrial DNA, control region, genetic diversity INTRODUCTION Grey francolin F. pondicerianus, Swamp francolin F.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Species Composition of Vertebrate Fauna of Orchha Wildlife Sanctuary, Central India
    International Journal of Int. J. of Life Sciences, 2018; 6 (2):357-364 Life Sciences ISSN:2320-7817(p) | 2320-964X(o) International Peer Reviewed Open Access Refereed Journal UGC Approved Journal No 48951 Original Article Open Access An exploration of species composition of vertebrate fauna of Orchha Wildlife Sanctuary, Central India Shrivastava Vineet K1*, Hore Upamanyu 2, Kala Jagdish C3, Srivastava Arpita4 1Amity School of Natural Resources & Sustainable Development, Amity University, Noida-201 303 India, 2Amity Institute of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Amity University, Noida-201 303 3Former Director General of Forests & Secretary, MoEF & CC, Govt. of India, New Delhi 4Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012 Email: [email protected]| +91-9911353907 Manuscript details: ABSTRACT Received : 01.03.2018 This research is an exploration of vertebrate fauna of the Orchha Wildlife Accepted : 14.04.2018 Sanctuary (OWS) in central India. The study consolidates information from Published : 25.04.2018 field surveys. A total of 15 fish (6 families), 6 amphibians (3 families), 13 reptile (9 families), 98 bird (43 families) and 19 mammal (15 families) Editor: Dr. Arvind Chavhan species are reported. It was found that the birds were the most dominant Cite this article as: vertebrates, followed by mammals, fishes and reptiles whereas amphibians Shrivastava Vineet K, Hore were represented least. Four species of turtle and rare species of vulture Upamanyu, Kala Jagdish C, including king vulture were present in the OWS. This is a first such Srivastava Arpita (2018) An extensive study for the Sanctuary and provides an initial baseline of exploration of species composition vertebrate species for future research in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Arabian Peninsula
    THE CONSERVATION STATUS AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE BREEDING BIRDS OF THE ARABIAN PENINSULA Compiled by Andy Symes, Joe Taylor, David Mallon, Richard Porter, Chenay Simms and Kevin Budd ARABIAN PENINSULA The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM - Regional Assessment About IUCN IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, helps the world find pragmatic solutions to our most pressing environment and development challenges. IUCN’s work focuses on valuing and conserving nature, ensuring effective and equitable governance of its use, and deploying nature-based solutions to global challenges in climate, food and development. IUCN supports scientific research, manages field projects all over the world, and brings governments, NGOs, the UN and companies together to develop policy, laws and best practice. IUCN is the world’s oldest and largest global environmental organization, with almost 1,300 government and NGO Members and more than 15,000 volunteer experts in 185 countries. IUCN’s work is supported by almost 1,000 staff in 45 offices and hundreds of partners in public, NGO and private sectors around the world. www.iucn.org About the Species Survival Commission The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions with a global membership of around 7,500 experts. SSC advises IUCN and its members on the wide range of technical and scientific aspects of species conservation, and is dedicated to securing a future for biodiversity. SSC has significant input into the international agreements dealing with biodiversity conservation. About BirdLife International BirdLife International is the world’s largest nature conservation Partnership. BirdLife is widely recognised as the world leader in bird conservation.
    [Show full text]