Damnatio and Interpretatio Christiana
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Antiquity in plaster : production, reception and destruction of plaster copies from the Athenian Agora to Felix Meritis in Amsterdam Godin, F.T.J. Publication date 2009 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Godin, F. T. J. (2009). Antiquity in plaster : production, reception and destruction of plaster copies from the Athenian Agora to Felix Meritis in Amsterdam. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:23 Sep 2021 3. CLASSICAL ART IN MEDIEVAL COLLECTIONS Damnatio and Interpretatio christiana Whatever the individual collector selects any ‘thing’ is ultimately destined to constitute an unconscious prophylactic device to assist the owner in mastering a feeling of threat and to control a sense of helpless frustration. Werner Muensterberger262 1. Christian versus pagan art, salvage or destruction? The controvercy of Christian versus pagan art is a relevant side-theme of copying, because it determined the fate of ancient classical artforms. However, the dualism was not always as rigorous as the literary sources, first and foremost the Church fathers, suggest. A lot was derived of Greco-Roman imagery, but also from Classical architecture.263 Early Christian churches imitated the Roman basilica and often spolia were incorporated, most conspicuously the antique columns. The art forms themselves remained unchanged, for one continued to illustrated manu- scripts, carve stone relief's (sarcophagi and architectural decorations), create mosaics, wall paintings and wood panel-paintings. Ancient gemstones were admired and, occasionally with small alterations, icorporated into liturgical objects. Overall there was a generally accepted structure, which was (subconsciously?) accepted. From this perspective it is not surprising that to medieval man Greco-Roman imagery was regarded as Christian, for it all looked very similar. This symbiosis or coexistence was a general phenomenon and not an exception.264 During the medieval period large freestanding Classical sculpture was the subject of a comprehensive controversy. No other genre was more appealing or was discussed with greater intensity. The Bible after all encouraged the destruction of pagan sculpture. Deuteronomy verse 7:25 reads: 262. Muensterberger 1994, 170. To shed more light on the phenomena of collecting from a psychoanalytical perspective Muensterberger examined the underlying driving factors of collectors, while taking into account the cultural influence on human behaviour. 263 See: Grabar 1969, Engelmann 1976, Kaiser-Minn 1981. 264. Ramsay MacMullen (1997) refuted the traditional view of a victorious Christendom that prevailed on all fronts as one-sided and false. A distorting factor is the way in which historians dealt with literary sources. One has to keep in mind that the Church fathers did not recoil from manipulating history. An illustration of this is a statement of one of the great church historians of the 4th century, Eusebius of Caes- area, who stated that historiography should be limited to that which was profitable for the spreading of the Christian faith. His successors adopted this attitude, as a result details were bent out of shape or passed over and some events were entirely suppressed (Euseb., Hist.eccl., 8.1 ; quoted by MacMullen 1997, 4). Later historians never questioned these literary sources and regarded them as truthful beyond any doubt. Whereas from early on all the books of pagan writers were considered heretical, were destroyed and disappeared from the libraries and therefore also from history (see: MacMullen 1997, 3.). Additional arguments in this context came from Robin Lane Fox (1986, especially chapt. 13), who made a study of religious life in declining years of the Roman Empire. Lane Fox opposed the persisting theory of Edward Gibbon (1776) and followers who believed that Christianity evolved in a decaying pagan culture. For more recent studies on the Fall of Rome, see: Smith 2005; Ward-Perkins 2005; Heather 2006. 41 ‘The graven images of their [the gentiles] gods shall ye burn with fire (..) for it is an abomination to the Lord thy God’. Such medieval controversies opposing Classical Antiquity actually functioned as a kind of bridge towards the Renaissance.265 In the intellectual realm the attitude of the Church Fathers toward ancient philosophy - little distinction was made between philosophy and theology- is determined by synthesis on the one side and antithesis on the other. Tertullian (c.160-c.230) regarded pagan philosophy as the foolishness of this world and the philosophers as mere patriarchs of the heretics.266 Clement of Alexandria (c.150-219) sought to develop the systematic presentation of the Christian wisdom in a true, as opposed to a false, gnosis (Greek: insight).267 He believed, like Justin (c.100-c.165) before him, that Plato had borrowed his knowledge from Moses and the prophets.268 In the end the neo-platonic ideas as formulated by Clement and after him Augustine (354-430) prevailed. A Greek philosopher that fitted well in this ideology was Socrates. A passage in the 10th chapter of Justin's Second Apology is eloquent: (..)’Our doctrine, then, appears to be greater than all human teaching. Those who by human birth were more ancient than Christ, when they attempted to consider and prove things by Logos were brought before the tribunal (..) And Socrates, who was more zealous in this direction than all of them, was accused of the very same crimes as ourselves’.269 Nevertheless, the dogmatic tenets held by the Church rejected pagan idol worship and polytheistic myth. Clement’s Protrepticus or Exhortation to the Gentiles exemplifies this attitude. In line with the tradition of apologetic writing it is entirely directed against image worship of all kinds, from primitive xoana (ancient wooden idol statues) to Serapis and the statues of the emperor.270 He believed that all pagan gods were representatives of demons, in opposition to the one Christian God who created the heavens and all that is in it.271 Marcianus Aristides wrote an Apology (c.140 A.D.) addressed to the emperor Antoninus Pius. A good deal of it is devoted to an attack on the pagan deities of Greece and Egypt.272 Hippolytus, a learned presbyter of Rome who lived in the 3rd-century, wrote about the screening of candidates for instruction prior to baptism. He gave these directives among others: (..)’If a man were a sculptor or a painter, he shall be charged not to make idols. If he does not desist, he must be rejected. (..) A heathen priest or anyone who tends idols must desist or be rejected’.273 265. Gramaccini 1996, 11. 266. Tert. De anim, 3. 267. Copleston 1993, 26. 268. Clem.Al., Strom., I, 5. 269. As quoted by Hannestad 1994, 156. The art historian William Heckscher (1939, 205) argued that the idea of a concordance between Paganism and Christianity was quite common and anything but heretical. The archaeologist Glen Bowersock (1990, 13) explained this as the need of rising Christianity for cultural legitimacy: acculturation rather than confrontation would have been the determining factor. 270. Clem.Al., Protr.: Against image worship in general, see: 47,1. Against xoana (primitive wooden idols), see: 51,3. Against Serapis, see: 48,1-4,6 / 50,3 / 52,4 / 53,2. 271. Clem.Al., Protr., 62, 4. 272. Copleston 1993, 15ff. 273. Hippol., Apost. Trad. 16. 11. 16. 42 Attitudes such as these determined the fate of classical sculptures, which were regarded as repulsive idols only good for sending to the limekiln or to the forge. Despite their rejection of any idolatry whatsoever, Tertullian, Origin and Clement of Alexandria never ordered the destruction of pagan works of art.274 Neither is their any direct evidence that Christians publicly insulted or destroyed pagan shrines or idols or any specific occasion before the end of the 3rd- century A.D. 275 The apostle Paul, in his Letter to the Romans (mid-first century A.D.), likewise condemned the robbing of pagan temples: ‘Thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege?’276 Renewed persecution of Christians under Emperor Diocletian in 303 A.D. seems to mark a change in attitude. In his History of the Martyrs of Palestine Eusebius, bishop of Caesarea, recorded several violent acts of sacrilege committed by Christians under the strains and stresses of persecution in the days of Maximian and Galerius (292-311), although this did not involve the destruction of idols.277 The change of attitude was further stimulated by the Edict of Milan where Constantine and his co-emperor in the East, Licinius, agreed on a policy of religious freedom for all, Christians and pagans alike. This meant that Christianity now earned official approval and support throughout the Roman empire. The recently persecuted Church shifted from defence to attack. Eusebius, who wrote a biography of Constantine- had high hopes; he described the emperor as a destroyer of idols and as a suppressor of pagan worship.278 Eusebius also stated that Constantine issued a law that prohibited all pagan sacrifices.279 Although this statement is highly disputable and this law was certainly not put into motion.280 In the same year, Constantine issued, joint by Licinius, a decree proclaiming tolerance for all religions of the empire including Christianity.