DOCSLIB.ORG

Zero Waste Action Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Zero Waste Action Plan Zero Waste Action Plan For the City of Glendale, California Zero Waste Associates A partnership of Richard Anthony Associates and Gary Liss & Associates with Support from Hidden Resources and Earth Resource Foundation December 1, 2010 Zero Waste Action Plan for the City of Glendale, California 1 Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1A. EXISTING SYSTEM............................................................................................................................................................................ 4 1B. ZERO WASTE RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................................................................................................. 4 2. Background and Existing System ............................................................................................................................................ 7 2A. SCOPE OF WORK .............................................................................................................................................................................. 7 2B. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................................................................. 7 TABLE 1: BUSINESSES AND NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES BY SECTOR IN CITY OF GLENDALE ...................................................................... 7 2C. EXISTING RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, RECYCLING AND LANDFILLING SYSTEM ............................................................................... 8 3. Analysis ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 10 3A. EXISTING DISCARD STREAM IN MARKET CATEGORIES .................................................................................................................. 10 TABLE 2: COMMODITY BY PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL AND TONS ............................................................................................................ 10 3B. SERVICE OPPORTUNITIES ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................................................. 10 TABLE 3: PRODUCT AND MATERIALS MARKET INVENTORY ................................................................................................................ 11 3C. PROGRAM AND FACILITY ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................................................. 13 TABLE 4: CHALLENGES ASSOCIATED WITH MORE DIFFICULT TO HANDLE DISCARDS ......................................................................... 13 3D. COMMODITIES ANALYSIS .............................................................................................................................................................. 14 TABLE 5: ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE OF GLENDALE’S DISCARDS .................................................................................................... 14 3E. ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS FROM RECOVERY OF RESOURCES ...................................................................................................... 15 TABLE 6: EPA WARM MODEL SUMMARY: RECYCLING/COMPOSTING VS. LANDFILLING .................................................................. 15 3F. RESULTS OF STAKEHOLDER SURVEYS ........................................................................................................................................... 15 3G. OUTCOME OF WORKSHOPS TO ENGAGE STAKEHOLDERS ............................................................................................................. 17 4. Zero Waste Recommendations ............................................................................................................................................... 19 4A. ZERO WASTE POLICIES ................................................................................................................................................................... 19 4B.MANDATORY COMMERCIAL RECYCLING ......................................................................................................................................... 21 4C.RECOVERING ENERGY AND COMPOST FROM ORGANIC DISCARDS .................................................................................................... 23 TABLE 7: OVERVIEW OF TECHNOLOGY/HANDLNG OPTIONS AND BALLPARK COSTS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF COMPOSTING AND ENERGY GENERATION AT SCHOLL CANYON LANDFILL………………………………………………………………………………………….25 4D. COMMERCIAL WASTE REDUCTION INITIATIVE……………………………………………………………………………………..26 CHANGING THE CULTURE THROUGH OUTREACH AND EDUCATION ........................................................................................................ 27 HIERARCHY OF OPTIONS FOR FOOD SCRAPS .......................................................................................................................................... 30 TABLE 8: HIERARCHY OF OPTIONS FOR FOOD SCRAPS .......................................................................................................................... 31 SOURCE REDUCTION STRATEGIES FOR THE FOOD SERVICE INDUSTRY…………………………………………………………………31 4E. OTHER WASTE REDUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................................................................ 33 GREEN BUILDING REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................................................................................ 33 REUSE PROGRAMS ................................................................................................................................................................................ 33 REGULATED AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS HANDLING ........................................................................................................................ 34 DESCRIPTION AND FEASIBILITY OF A RESOURCE RECOVERY PARK ........................................................................................................ 35 5. Implementation ............................................................................................................................................................................. 37 5A. FISCAL IMPACT .............................................................................................................................................................................. 37 5B. FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE ....................................................................................................................................... 37 5C. BUDGET (SUMMARY OF COSTS AND REVENUE) ............................................................................................................................. 38 Appendices .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 40 APPENDIX A: SAMPLE ZERO WASTE RESOLUTION (FOR FORMAL ADOPTION) ...................................................................................... 40 APPENDIX B: SAMPLE PLASTIC BAG RESOLUTION............................................................................................................................... 42 APPENDIX C: DRAFT MANDATORY COMMERCIAL RECYCLING ORDINANCE ....................................................................................... 47 APPENDIX D: EXTENDED PRODUCER RESPONSIBILITY RESOLUTION ................................................................................................... 48 Zero Waste Action Plan for the City of Glendale, California 2 Supplemental Documents Included with this Zero Waste Action Plan Supplemental Document 1: Compostable Organic Discard Collection and Processing Evaluation Supplemental Document 2: Evaluation of Mandatory Recycling Ordinances Supplemental Document 3: Results of Stakeholder Surveys and Outcome of Workshops to Engage Stakeholders Analysis Zero Waste Action Plan for the City of Glendale, California 3 Executive Summary 1A. Existing System The City of Glendale (the “City”) provides collection services for all single-family residences (1-4 units), 80% of apartment buildings with 5 units or more, and 15% of businesses (mostly small ones). All 1-4 units have recycling. Only 45% of 5-unit multifamily dwellings (MFDs) have recycling bins. All recycling collection services are provided by Glendale for free. Sixty-two private haulers provide 85% of commercial collection within the City. This is an openly competitive system, with five large companies - Athens, Southland, Crown, Waste Management and Consolidated - possessing more than 80% of the business. Some provide recycling services for free, and some charge. The majority of refuse collected is hauled to the Scholl Canyon Landfill. In addition to Glendale, six other jurisdictions use Scholl Canyon. They include La Canada Flintridge, Pasadena, South Pasadena, San Marino, Sierra Madre, and the adjacent unincorporated parts of Los Angeles County. Tip fees are currently $48.99/ton, and estimated to increase to $90/ton after the Landfill closes and rail haul is established. Glendale’s Environmental Management Division estimates that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Attachment E Part 2
    Response to Correspondence from Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy Regarding the ArtCenter Master Plan Note that the emails (Attachment A) dated after April 25, 2018, were provided to the City after the end of the CEQA comment period, and, therefore, the emails and the responses below are not included in the EIR, and no response is required under CEQA. However, for sake of complete analysis and consideration of all comments submitted, the City responds herein and this document is made part of the project staff report. Response to Correspondence This correspondence with the Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy occurred in the context of the preparation of the EIR for the ArtCenter Master Plan. The formal comment letter from Arroyos & Foothills Conservancy included in this correspondence was responded to as Letter No. 6 in Section III, Response to Comments, of the April 2018 Final EIR for the ArtCenter Master Plan. The primary correspondence herein is comprised of emails between John Howell and Mickey Long discussing whether there is a wildlife corridor within the Hillside Campus, as well as emails between John Howell and CDFW regarding whether there is a wildlife corridor and whether CDFW will provide a comment letter regarding the ArtCenter Project for the Planning Commission hearing on May 9, 2018. Note that CDFW submitted a comment letter on May 9, 2018, after completion of the Draft EIR and Final EIR. The City has also provided a separate response to this late comment letter. This correspondence centers around the potential for the Hillside Campus to contribute to a wildlife corridor. The CDFW was contacted during preparation of the Final EIR to obtain specific mapping information to provide a more comprehensive description of the potential for wildlife movement within the Hillside Campus within the Final EIR.
    [Show full text]
  • 1239 S Glendale Ave
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM 1239 S GLENDALE AVE RARE BLOCK—TO—BLOCK SITE | “GLENDALE STUDIOS” This is a confidential Offering Memorandum intended solely for your limited use and benefit in determining whether you desire to express any further interest in the purchase of 1239 S Glendale Ave, Glendale, CA (“the Property”). This Offering Memorandum was prepared by Cushman & Wakefield of California, Inc. (“Cushman & Wakefield”) and has been reviewed by representatives of the owners of The Property (“the Ownership”). It contains selected information pertaining to the Property and does not purport to be all-inclusive or to contain all of the information that prospective purchasers may desire. It should be noted that all information provided is for general reference purposes only in that such information is based on assumptions relating to the general economy, competition, and other factors beyond the control of Ownership and, therefore, is subject to material variation. Additional information and an opportunity to inspect the Property will be made available to interested and qualified prospective purchasers. Neither Ownership nor Cushman & Wakefield nor any of their respective officers have made any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of this Offering Memorandum, any of its contents, or any other materials provided as a courtesy to facilitate prospective purchaser’s own investigations of the Property, and no legal commitments or obligations shall arise by reason of this Offering Memorandum, its contents or any further information provided by Cushman & Wakefield regarding the Property. It is essential that all parties to real estate transactions be aware of the health, liability and economic impact of environmental factors on real estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Calrecycle of Diversion
    RECEIVED January 16, 2015 Commission on BETIYT. YEE State Mandates California State Controller LATE FILING January 15, 2015 Heather Halsey Executive Director Commission on State Mandates 980 Ninth Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814 Re: Incorrect Reduction Claim (IRC) Integrated Waste Management, 14-0007-I-03 Public Resources Code Section 40418, 40196.3, and 42920-42928 Public Contract Code Section 12167 and 12167.1 Statutes of 1992, Chapter 1116 (AB 3521); Statutes of 1999, Chapter 764 (AB 75) Fiscal Years: 1999-2000, 2000-2001, 2003-2004, 2004-2005, 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007-2008, 2008-2009, 2009-2010, and 2010-2011 Citrus Community College District, Claimant Dear Ms. Halsey: The State Controller's Office is transmitting our response to the above-named IRC. If you have any questions, please contact me by telephone at (916) 323-5849. Sinc~rel~ ;tSPANt Mandated Cost Audits Bureau Division of Audits JLS/sk 14977 P.O. Box 942850, Sacramento, CA 94250 + (916) 445-2636 3301 C Street, Suite 700, Sacramento, CA 95816 + (916) 324-8907 901 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 200, Monterey Park, CA 91754 + (323) 981-6802 RESPONSE BY THE STATE CONTROLLER'S OFFICE TO THE INCORRECT REDUCTION CLAIM (IRC) BY CITRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Integrated Waste Management Program Table of Contents Description State Controller's Office (SCO) Response to District's Comments Declaration .................................... ~ .......................................................................................... Tab 1 SCO Analysis and Response .................................................................................................... Tab 2 Sacramento County Superior Court Judgment Granting Petition for Writ of Administrative Mandamus dated June 30, 2008 ...................................................... Tab 3 District's Waste Management Annual Reports to CalRecycle of diversion ............................ Tab 4 District's website information- Citrus College-Recycling Program ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • FRIENDS of the GLENDALE PUBLIC LIBRARY News JULY 2013 Vol
    FRIENDS OF THE GLENDALE PUBLIC LIBRARY news JULY 2013 Vol. 18, No. 3 Editor: S tanley L. Block, M.D. SPECIAL COLLECTIONS AT YOUR LIBRARY f one ascends the stairs of the Central Library to the second fl oor, turns right, walking past an area of study tables Iand chairs, you eventually fi nd yourself confronted by a pair of glass-paneled doors. The signage over the doors reads, “Special Collections”. Stepping over the threshold is a transforming experience. One enters a quiet room dominated by a huge library table surrounded by comfortable chairs. Wooden shelving lines all the walls. The contents of the shelves are visible through the metal mesh doors which cover the shelved cases. The shelves and the stacks in the adjoining room contain books, pamphlets, newspapers and news clippings, memorabilia, maps and atlases, documents from the world of politics, entertainment, law enforcement, etc. Here is an archive of Glendale and its environs. Overseeing the collection is Mike Shea, Special Collections Director. The following is an interview conducted with Mr. Shea by the Newsletter editor: First, Mr. Shea, tell us something about yourself: and magazine clippings covering a wide array of subjects My offi cial title is Librarian Specialist/Local History. I and Glendale residents, which benefi ts genealogists and have worked in the Reference Department at the Glendale historians alike. All of these materials help our patrons tell Central Library for the past 5½ years. the ongoing story of Glendale. I received my MLIS from San Jose State University in 2006. Of course, in every enterprise, there are challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-1681 Glendale OS.Xps
    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,510,000 CITY OF GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC REVENUE BONDS, 2013 REFUNDING SERIES MATURITY SCHEDULE Maturity Date Principal Interest CUSIP (February 1) Amount Rate Yield Number 2017 $ 900,000 4.00% 0.68% 378406LD2 2018 935,000 4.00 0.91 378406LE0 2019 975,000 4.00 1.23 378406LF7 2020 1,010,000 4.00 1.56 378406LG5 2021 1,055,000 4.00 1.80 378406LH3 2022 1,095,000 5.00 2.02 378406LJ9 2023 1,145,000 5.00 2.22 378406LK6 2024 1,210,000 5.00 2.37* 378406LL4 2025 1,265,000 5.00 2.50* 378406LM2 2026 1,330,000 5.00 2.63* 378406LN0 2027 1,395,000 5.00 2.72* 378406LP5 2028 1,485,000 5.00 2.82* 378406LQ3 2029 1,555,000 5.00 2.88* 378406LR1 2030 1,635,000 5.00 2.93* 378406LS9 2031 1,715,000 5.00 2.98* 378406LT7 2032 1,805,000 5.00 3.03 378406LU4 Priced to the first optional redemption date of February 1, 2023. CUSIP is a registered trademark of the American Bankers
    [Show full text]
  • 6.9 WATER QUALITY 6.9.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6.9.1.1 Regulatory
    Scholl Canyon Landfill Expansion EIR Section 6.0 6.9 WATER QUALITY The landfill design and operation are subject to substantial regulation to prevent degradation of water quality. In accordance with these regulations, the Scholl Canyon Landfill (SCLF) employs various measures to protect water quality including comprehensive monitoring and reporting programs. This section addresses potential water quality impacts of Variations 1 and 2 of the expansion of the SCLF and details the extensive water quality protection systems in place and planned for both variations. Potential water quality impacts on surface water and groundwater are assessed for both variations. 6.9.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6.9.1.1 Regulatory Setting Water quality protection at municipal solid waste landfill sites is governed by both federal and state regulations. At the federal level, the Water Pollution Control Act (also referred to as the Clean Water Act) requires surface water quality protection, and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act require groundwater quality protection. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgates regulations in Title 40 CFR. At the state level, water quality protection is specified in the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act. Regulations implementing both surface water and groundwater quality protection are contained in Title 27 CCR. The California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) has designated oversight responsibility for the implementation of these regulations to nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs). The SCLF is under the oversight of RWQCB, Los Angeles Region. Federal Regulations Relevant federal regulations to protect surface water and groundwater quality are discussed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Greener Glendale Plan
    Greener Glendale Plan Community Activities The City of Glendale’s Sustainability Plan Community Development Department Credits and Acknowledgments Funded by Glendale Water & Power and the United States Department of Energy Produced by the City of Glendale Community Development Department with Assistance from ICLEI (Local Governments for Sustainability), and the Statewide Energy Efficiency Collaborative. City Council and City Manager External Agencies and Partners Laura Friedman, Mayor Local Governments for Sustainability Rafi Manoukian, Council Member (ICLEI) Ara Najarian, Council Member Southern California Gas Company Frank Quintero, Council Member Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts David Weaver, Council Member California Energy Commission Scott Ochoa, City Manager California Air Resources Board Southern California Association of GWP Commission Governments Terry Chan, President Armen Adjemian, Commissioner Zanku Armenian, Commissioner Project staff: Cassandra Pruett, Planning Deborah Dentler, Commissioner Assistant; Laura Stotler, Principal Planner. Hugh Yao, Commissioner Planning Commission Greg Astorian, Commissioner Cover photo by Gary Edstrom, 2004. Stephanie Landregan, Commissioner Chang Lee, Commissioner Hank Scheetz, Commissioner A. Erik Yesayan, Commissioner This plan was adopted by the Glendale City Council on March 27, 2012. City Departments City Attorney City Clerk City Treasurer Community Development Community Services & Parks Finance Fire Glendale Water and Power Human Resources Information Services Library Management
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Annual Report
    Glendale, California Annual Report July 1, 2018 – June 30, 2019 GL GLENDALE C CITY HALL T HE ITY JEWEL C INCORPORATED 1906 City of Glendale, California CITY COUNCIL Ara Najarian Paula Devine Vartan Gharpetian Vrej Agajanian Frank Quintero MAYOR COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER COUNCILMEMBER Other Elected Officials Ardashes “Ardy” Kassakhian CITY CLERK Rafi Manoukian CITY TREASURER Appointed Officials Yasmin K. Beers CITY MANAGER Michael J. Garcia CITY ATTORNEY Acknowledgements Project Coordinators / Editors John Takhtalian – Project Coordinator/Editor Christine Powers, Eliza Papazian – Editors Annual Report Support Staff Aram Adjemian, Kathryn Engel, Michele Flynn, Atineh Haroutunian, Arsine Isayan, Jason Jacobsen, Jay Kreitz, Mirna Mejia, Julie Schaeffer, Judith Velasco, Celeste Wilson, Jay Wollenhaupt Graphics Section – Design and Printing About This Report The 2019 Annual Report highlights Glendale’s operations, programs, services, accomplishments, and future activities relative to the City’s ten guiding Council Table of priorities as follows: Contents 1. Fiscal Responsibility 6. Balanced, Quality Housing 2. Exceptional Customer Service 7. Community Services & Facilities 3. Economic Vibrancy 8. Infrastructure & Mobility Roster of City 4. Informed & Engaged Community 9. Arts & Culture Officials............. Inside cover 5. Safe & Healthy Community 10. Sustainability The first part of this report expands on each Council priority and the second Employee Code part provides a progress report for the City. This progress report is based upon a of Ethics............................... 1 set of established measures that are used as the basis for determining Glendale’s performance during the preceding and current fiscal years. About Our City.......................... 2 Employee Code of Ethics Community Profile................... 3 Purpose Fiscal Responsibility.................. 4 As City of Glendale employees, we are charged with the fundamental responsibility of safeguarding the public trust in local government.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year Ended June 30, 2012
    COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2012 city of About the Cover Americana at Brand Expansion The Americana at Brand opened in May 2008 and along with the Glendale Galleria, has been instrumental in creating a regional shopping district in the heart of the City. With 75 retail shops and a variety of dining options, the Americana is one of the premiere “lifestyle” centers in Southern California. The Americana also includes 100 condominiums and 238 apartments, and a 2-acre landscaped park, featuring an animated fountain centrally located within the project. In October 2011, the City approved a major expansion of the Americana, permitting the way for the relocation of Nordstrom into a new 120,000 SF anchor store. The new Nordstrom will sit on the site of a former motel and warehouse building and will seamlessly integrate with the larger center using a mixture of building finishes and colors that are complimentary to the original Americana design. Completion of the expansion is scheduled for October 2013, and once completed, will reaffirm Glendale as one of the region’s leading shopping destinations. Galleria Renovation One of the City’s first redevelopment projects, the Glendale Galleria opened its doors for business in 1976. Today, the Glendale Galleria draws over 26 million visitors a year, competing as a top Los Angeles area destination with the likes of Disneyland. With 250 of the country’s top specialty stores and four major department stores, Glendale Galleria is one of the premier brand-name shopping destinations in the Los Angeles area. In November 2011, the City approved a comprehensive renovation plan for the Galleria that includes new interior finishes, such as new stone and tile floors, façade improvements, and a new branding identity package, including new signage and graphics.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Turn Off Cellular Phones While Inside the Council Chamber
    A G E N D A GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBER, City Hall – 613 E Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206 Welcome to Glendale City Hall. Meetings are broadcast live on cable channel 6 (GTV6) and rebroadcast throughout the week. Call (818) 548-4013 for program schedules. DVDs of the proceedings are available for purchase in the City Clerk’s Office. Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at http://www.glendaleca.gov/government/agendas-minutes. If you have any question about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance, please contact the City Clerk at (818) 548-2090 during regular business hours. PLEASE TURN OFF CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE COUNCIL CHAMBER. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, auxiliary hearing aids, sign language translation, and Braille transcripts are available upon request. Assisted listening devices are available same-day upon request. At least 48 hours (or two business days) notice is required for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services. All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E. Broadway, RM 110, Glendale, CA 91206. Translation services are provided for meetings through the use of bilingual staff for speakers who wish to utilize the service as available. Speakers should state their request by contacting the City Clerk’s office at 818-548- 2090, at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Turn Off Cellular Phones While Inside the Council Chamber
    A G E N D A GLENDALE CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBER, City Hall – 613 E Broadway, 2nd Floor Glendale, CA 91206 Welcome to Glendale City Hall. Meetings are broadcast live on cable channel 6 (GTV6) and rebroadcast throughout the week. Call (818) 548-4013 for program schedules. DVDs of the proceedings are available for purchase in the City Clerk’s Office. Meetings are also archived on the City Website for viewing anytime at http://www.glendaleca.gov/government/agendas-minutes. If you have any question about matters on the agenda, or requests for assistance, please contact the City Clerk at (818) 548-2090 during regular business hours. PLEASE TURN OFF CELLULAR PHONES WHILE INSIDE THE COUNCIL CHAMBER. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, auxiliary hearing aids, sign language translation, and Braille transcripts are available upon request. Assisted listening devices are available same-day upon request. At least 48 hours (or two business days) notice is required for requests regarding sign language translation and Braille transcription services. All documents related to open session items on this agenda that are received less than 72 hours prior to this meeting, and are public records, will be available for review in the Office of the City Clerk, 613 E. Broadway, RM 110, Glendale, CA 91206. Translation services are provided for meetings through the use of bilingual staff for speakers who wish to utilize the service as available. Speakers should state their request by contacting the City Clerk’s office at 818-548- 2090, at least 24 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • J±24M^ [J Determined Eligible for the National Register G Sae Continuation Sheet
    (Oct. 1990) United States Department of the interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to. Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by rnariclhci *V in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not appticabte." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. Hotel Glendale historic name _ other names/site number Glendale Hotel 2. Location 701 2ast Broadway street & number D not for publication Glendale city or town __ _ D vicinity California cod8 _CA_ eoiuayLos Angeles code Q37 zipCOdfi 91206 3- State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, ! hereby certify that this & nomination G request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property 3 meets D does not meet the National Register criteria. 1 recommend that this property be considered significant G nationafiyJ-Zt statewide Q; locally. (D See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ——————— U, 'T i——————————————...———————————f~————-—————— Signature^ of certifying official/Title/ Date rvF_ "flistoiric PrQSQ-TVcttiiori ' State of Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property G meets G does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]