Office of Space Launch Program Overview for California Space Authority

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Office of Space Launch Program Overview for California Space Authority National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Office of Space Launch Program Overview for California Space Authority Col Mick Hatch 27 March 2003 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Agenda ! Office of Space Launch Mission ! Organization ! Programs ! Manifest ! Launch in Transition OvervieCSP - 2 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch OSL Mission ! Single NRO interface for all launch activities " NRO Mission Director has clear responsibility, accountability, authority for NRO missions from inception through launch " Provides independent Mission Assurance Team reviews for launch vehicles " Provides centralized control for launch vehicle hardware, launch services, integration, and operations " Integral part of NRO “Cradle-to-Grave” philosophy for all mission areas " Principal external interface with industry, AF, NASA " NRO satellite program offices have “one stop shopping” for launch support ! NRO launch model validated by Space Launch Broad Area Review ! Work jointly with Air Force Space Command and NASA for Mission Success OvervieCSP - 3 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch OSL Priorities ! Successful extended fly-out of legacy systems " Transition Titan fly-out effort to NRO contract 1 October 2003 ! Successful transition to EELV " Preparing next two EELV acquisitions " First NRO EELV mission is from Vandenberg in April 2004 • New satellite, new booster, new launch complex, new satellite processing facility ! Transition from government facility to commercial facility for satellite processing at Vandenberg Mission Success! OvervieCSP - 5 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Agenda ! Office of Space Launch Mission ! Organization ! Programs ! Manifest ! Launch in Transition OvervieCSP - 6 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch OSL Operating Locations VANDENBERG AFB, CA NRO HQ, VA CAPE CANAVERAL AFS, FL LOS ANGELES AFB, CA SCHRIEVER AFB, CO OvervieCSP - 7 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch OSL Organization Director, Office of Space Launch NRO Mission Director Staff Offices Director’s Staff Deputy Director CITO Office of Space Launch Chief of Staff Contracts Director’s Action Group Mission Assurance Executive Services Advanced Programs Infrastructure Acquisition Program Control Safety Launch Management Communications Security Cape Canaveral AFS Vandenberg AFB OvervieCSP - 8 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch OSL Interfaces DNRO/DDNRO NASA NRO Satellite SPOs Facilities Space Vehicle Contractors Requirements Titan IV SPO HQ USAF Launch Vehicle Integration Contractors HQ AFSPC Air Force Planning Space Command HQ NASA Requirements & $$$ Atlas II SPO EELV SPO Delta SPO OvervieCSP - 9 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Agenda ! Office of Space Launch Mission ! Organization ! Programs ! Manifest ! Launch in Transition OvervieCSP - 10 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Titan IV ! Current heavy lift capability for National Security Payloads ! Configuration: " Core: Lockheed Martin " Centaur: Lockheed Martin " Solid Rocket Motor: Alliant " Payload Fairing: McDonnell Douglas (Boeing) " Liquid Rocket Engine: Aerojet ! Capability (weight to orbit) " Centaur to GEO 12,700 " Centaur to HEO 14,500 " NUS to LEO Polar 38,800 OvervieCSP - 11 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Titan IV ! Facilities: " Cape Canaveral: SLC-40 " Vandenberg: SLC-4 East ! Flown To Date " 30 of 34 successful launches ! 2 AF Missions Remaining ! 3 NRO Missions Remaining OvervieCSP - 12 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Atlas IIAS ! Current medium lift capability " Supports both government and commercial requirements ! Configuration: " Core: Lockheed Martin " Centaur: Lockheed Martin " Payload Fairing: Lockheed Martin " Booster Engine: Rocketdyne ! Capability (weight to orbit) " Centaur to LEO: 19,000 " Centaur to LEO Polar: 15,900 " Centaur to GTO: 8,150 OvervieCSP - 13 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Atlas IIAS ! Facilities: " Cape Canaveral: SLC-36A " Vandenberg: SLC-3E ! NRO Flown To Date: Four ! NRO Remaining: One ! Contract Status: " Atlas IIAS follow-on buy is on contract " Includes production, storage, launch processing, launch site support and logistics OvervieCSP - 14 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Atlas IIIB ! Transitional medium lift capability " Supports both government and commercial requirements ! Configuration " Core: Lockheed Martin " Centaur: Lockheed Martin " Payload Fairing: Lockheed Martin " Booster Engine: Energomash ! Capability (weight to orbit) " Centaur to LEO: 23,630 " Centaur to LEO Polar: N/A " Centaur to GTO: 9,920 ! Facilities: " Cape Canaveral: SLC-36B ! NRO Flown To Date: None ! NRO Remaining: Two OvervieCSP - 15 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Delta II " Configuration: (7925) • Stage 1: Rocketdyne • Stage 2: Aerojet • Stage 3: STAR 48 Boeing/Thiokol • 9 GEM Solid Rocket Boosters " Capability (weight to orbit): • GTO: 4,120 • Final orbit achieved by S/V propulsion " Facilities: • Cape Canaveral: SLC-17 • Vandenberg: SLC-2W " Contract structure: • Commercial launch service acquired through SMC/CL OvervieCSP - 16 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) ! Next Generation Family of Launch Vehicles " Provide a medium and heavy space launch capability " Support government and commercial requirements " Reduce cost for assured access to space " Improve operability and capability " Standard Interface ! USAF awarded two Development Agreements " The Boeing Company (Delta IV) " Lockheed Martin Corporation (Atlas V) ! Initial Launch Service contracts awarded for 28 missions " Boeing awarded 21 missions (18 AF, 3 NRO) " Lockheed Martin awarded 7 missions (6 AF, 1 NRO) ! Purchasing a launch service, not specific hardware OvervieCSP - 17 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) ! Facilities " Cape Canaveral • SLC-37 (Delta IV) • SLC-41 (Atlas V) " Vandenberg • SLC-6 (Delta IV) ! Schedule " Delta IV • First Flight MLV – November 2002 • First Government Mission – 10 Mar 2003 (DSCS) • First Flight HLV – September (TBD) 2003 • First NRO Mission – April 2004 " Atlas V • First Flight MLV – August 2002 • First NRO Mission – October 2006 OvervieCSP - 18 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Agenda ! Office of Space Launch Mission ! Organization ! Programs ! Manifest ! Launch in Transition OvervieCSP - 19 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Agenda ! Office of Space Launch Mission ! Organization ! Programs ! Manifest ! Launch in Transition OvervieCSP - 21 UNCLASSIFIED SECRET//BYE/SI/TK//X1 National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Launch in Transition Legacy Era EELV Transition Era Goals: • Lower Cost • Reduce Time on Pad • Improve Business Practices • Leverage -- Commercial -- DoD Legacy Launch Vehicles New family of boosters • Atlas • Evolved Expendable • Titan Launch Vehicles (EELV) High Cost Lower Cost Commercial Leverage Commercial Leverage Measurable Risk Measurable Risk OvervieCSP - 22 UNCLASSIFIEDSECRET//BYE/SI/TK//X1 National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Launch in Transition – Challenges ! Near term heavy dependence on legacy launch systems " Extended flyout of Titan IV due to satellite program delays " Aging Titan launch base infrastructure ! EELV transition " Government is the primary EELV customer, including many “firsts” " Foreign technology dependency " New main engine engine development " Sole source dependence • West Coast, heavy lift, upper stage engine " Risk • Higher for last legacy flights, first EELV flights • Aggressive mission assurance program in place for legacy and EELV OvervieCSP - 23 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch Risk to Mission Success (Notional Data) Launch RISK Human Interaction Harshness of Satellite Environment Operational Launch Pad First Time Events Early Ops k s i R Pack & Ship g n i Program Test s a e Start Normal Ops r c n I 4 Years 1 yr 6 Mo 4-15 Years Time OvervieCSP - 24 UNCLASSIFIED National Reconnaissance Office UNCLASSIFIED Office of Space Launch This is Rocket Science ! OvervieCSP - 25 UNCLASSIFIED.
Recommended publications
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas Launch System Mission Planner's Guide, Atlas V Addendum
    ATLAS Atlas Launch System Mission Planner’s Guide, Atlas V Addendum FOREWORD This Atlas V Addendum supplements the current version of the Atlas Launch System Mission Plan- ner’s Guide (AMPG) and presents the initial vehicle capabilities for the newly available Atlas V launch system. Atlas V’s multiple vehicle configurations and performance levels can provide the optimum match for a range of customer requirements at the lowest cost. The performance data are presented in sufficient detail for preliminary assessment of the Atlas V vehicle family for your missions. This guide, in combination with the AMPG, includes essential technical and programmatic data for preliminary mission planning and spacecraft design. Interface data are in sufficient detail to assess a first-order compatibility. This guide contains current information on Lockheed Martin’s plans for Atlas V launch services. It is subject to change as Atlas V development progresses, and will be revised peri- odically. Potential users of Atlas V launch service are encouraged to contact the offices listed below to obtain the latest technical and program status information for the Atlas V development. For technical and business development inquiries, contact: COMMERCIAL BUSINESS U.S. GOVERNMENT INQUIRIES BUSINESS INQUIRIES Telephone: (691) 645-6400 Telephone: (303) 977-5250 Fax: (619) 645-6500 Fax: (303) 971-2472 Postal Address: Postal Address: International Launch Services, Inc. Commercial Launch Services, Inc. P.O. Box 124670 P.O. Box 179 San Diego, CA 92112-4670 Denver, CO 80201 Street Address: Street Address: International Launch Services, Inc. Commercial Launch Services, Inc. 101 West Broadway P.O. Box 179 Suite 2000 MS DC1400 San Diego, CA 92101 12999 Deer Creek Canyon Road Littleton, CO 80127-5146 A current version of this document can be found, in electronic form, on the Internet at: http://www.ilslaunch.com ii ATLAS LAUNCH SYSTEM MISSION PLANNER’S GUIDE ATLAS V ADDENDUM (AVMPG) REVISIONS Revision Date Rev No.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas As a Human Rated LV
    AtlasAtlas As As A A Human Human RatedRated LV LV STAIF Conference 2006 Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company Atlas for Human Spaceflight 15 Feb 2006 1 © 2006 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved Reliable and Versatile Launch Vehicle Family Atlas I Atlas II Atlas IIA Atlas IIAS Atlas IIIA Atlas IIIB Atlas V-400 Atlas V-500 AC-69 AC-102 AC-105 AC-108 AC-201 AC-204 AV-001 AV-003 Jul 1990 Dec 1991 Jun 1992 Dec 1993 May 2000 Feb 2002 Aug 2002 Jul 2003 8/11 10/10 23/23 30/30 2/2 4/4 4/4 3/3 Legend: First Flight X/Y X successes in Y flights •8 of 8 First Flight Successes •78 Consecutive Successful Atlas Centaur Flights •100% Mission Success Atlas II, IIA, IIAS, III & V Families •487 Total Launch Successes Since Atlas Program Inception Mission Success—One Launch at a Time Atlas for Human Spaceflight 15 Feb 2006 2 AV-010 Launch • January 19, 2006 • NASA Pluto New Horizons Spacecraft • First 551 configuration • First Block 2 Fault Tolerant Avionics • First Block B SRB • Nuclear certified • Nominal flight profile • Injection conditions well within 1 sigma – C3, RLA, DLA Fastest Spacecraft Ever Launched Atlas for Human Spaceflight 15 Feb 2006 3 Atlas Evolution History Atlas I/II Family Atlas III Family Atlas V Family 5-m PLF ) 30 GSO Kit T m ( y 26 t i l Avionics i Single Common Upgrade b Engine a 22 Centaur Centaur p a C 3.8-m . Common c 18 r LO2 Core i Tank Booster C Stretch ) 14 m n 0 2 10 Liquid 2 SRBs ( Strap-ons m RD-180 SRBs k 6 Engine 7 0 Atlas I Atlas IIAS Atlas IIIA Atlas IIIB Atlas V Atlas V Atlas V 4 2 Atlas II (SEC) (DEC)
    [Show full text]
  • SPACE NUCLEAR THER4. PROPULSION Progrth Conpilation of New Releases, News Clippings, and Journal Articles
    ,SPACE NUCLEAR THER4. PROPULSION PROGRth Conpilation of new releases, news clippings, and journal articles DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL EXCELLENCE (AFCEE) BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS 78235-5000 INEL Technical Library (PRR) Attn: Gail Willmore 1776 Science Center Drive Idaho Falls, ID 83415 Dear Ms Willmore Per our telephone conversation on 23 March, 1992, I am enclosing a compilation of news releases, news clippings, and journal articles on the Space Nuclear Thermal Propulsion program. Request you make these available to the general public through your reference desk (along with this letter), and suggest-a-3=74 31- hour--tinte---1-inti-t—on-ch-eekeut so all interested parties have the- opportunity to view-it7 All of this material is in the public domain and may be reproduced. Our intent in making this available is to provide an understanding of the technology and why it is being studied. However, since much of this consists of media articles, we cannot guarantee its accuracy. Decisions yet to be made about this program include whether to proceed with the technology development and if so, where to conduct ground testing. These decisions will be based in part on an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that we are preparing. Since two sites at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory are under consideration, we will be conducting a scoping meeting in Idaho Falls on Thursday, 9 April, 1992. It will be held at the Bonneville High School Auditorium at 7:00 PM. This meeting is open to the general public, and will assist us in determining the scope of environmental issues to be analyzed in the EIS.
    [Show full text]
  • N AS a Facts
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Launch Services Program he Launch Services Program (LSP) manufacturing, launch operations and rockets for launching Earth-orbit and Twas established at Kennedy Space countdown management, and providing interplanetary missions. Center for NASA’s acquisition and added quality and mission assurance in In September 2010, NASA’s Launch program management of expendable lieu of the requirement for the launch Services (NLS) contract was extended launch vehicle (ELV) missions. A skillful service provider to obtain a commercial by the agency for 10 years, through NASA/contractor team is in place to launch license. 2020, with the award of four indefinite meet the mission of the Launch Ser- Primary launch sites are Cape Canav- delivery/indefinite quantity contracts. The vices Program, which exists to provide eral Air Force Station (CCAFS) in Florida, expendable launch vehicles that NASA leadership, expertise and cost-effective and Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB) has available for its science, Earth-orbit services in the commercial arena to in California. and interplanetary missions are United satisfy agencywide space transporta- Other launch locations are NASA’s Launch Alliance’s (ULA) Atlas V and tion requirements and maximize the Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, the Delta II, Space X’s Falcon 1 and 9, opportunity for mission success. Kwajalein Atoll in the South Pacific’s Orbital Sciences Corp.’s Pegasus and facts The principal objectives of the LSP Republic of the Marshall Islands, and Taurus XL, and Lockheed Martin Space are to provide safe, reliable, cost-effec- Kodiak Island in Alaska. Systems Co.’s Athena I and II.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Invisible Visible: a History of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003)/ by Renee M
    MAKING THE INVISIBLE A History of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003) MONOGRAPHS IN AEROSPACE HISTORY, NO. 47 Renee M. Rottner MAKING THE INVISIBLE VISIBLE A History of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003) MONOGRAPHS IN AEROSPACE HISTORY, NO. 47 Renee M. Rottner National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Communications NASA History Division Washington, DC 20546 NASA SP-2017-4547 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Rottner, Renee M., 1967– Title: Making the invisible visible: a history of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003)/ by Renee M. Rottner. Other titles: History of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003) Description: | Series: Monographs in aerospace history; #47 | Series: NASA SP; 2017-4547 | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2012013847 Subjects: LCSH: Spitzer Space Telescope (Spacecraft) | Infrared astronomy. | Orbiting astronomical observatories. | Space telescopes. Classification: LCC QB470 .R68 2012 | DDC 522/.2919—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2012013847 ON THE COVER Front: Giant star Zeta Ophiuchi and its effects on the surrounding dust clouds Back (top left to bottom right): Orion, the Whirlpool Galaxy, galaxy NGC 1292, RCW 49 nebula, the center of the Milky Way Galaxy, “yellow balls” in the W33 Star forming region, Helix Nebula, spiral galaxy NGC 2841 This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks. ISBN 9781626830363 90000 > 9 781626 830363 Contents v Acknowledgments
    [Show full text]
  • Space Transportation Atlas V / Auxiliary Payload Overview Space
    SpaceSpace TransportationTransportation AtlasAtlas VV // AuxiliaryAuxiliary PayloadPayload OverviewOverview LockheedLockheed MartinMartin SpaceSpace SystemsSystems CompanyCompany JimJim EnglandEngland (303)(303) 977-0861977-0861 ProgramProgram Manager,Manager, AtlasAtlas GovernmentGovernment ProgramsPrograms BusinessBusiness DevelDevelopmentopment andand AdvancedAdvanced ProgramsPrograms 33 AugustAugust 20062006 1 Video – Take a Ride 2 ReliableReliable && VersatileVersatile LaunchLaunch VehicleVehicle FamilyFamily RReettiirreedd RReettiirreedd Atlas I AC-69 RReettiirreedd Jul 1990 Atlas II AC-102 RReettiirreedd 8/11 Dec 1991 Atlas IIA 10/10 AC-105 RReettiirreedd Jun 1992 • Consecutive Successful Atlas CentaurAtlas Flights: IIAS 79 Retired • First Flight Successes: 823/23 of 8 AC-108 Retired • Mission Success: 100% Atlas II, IIA, IIAS,Dec 1993 IIIA, IIIB, and V Families Atlas IIIA First Flight • Retired Variants: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H,30/30 I, II, IIA, IIAS,AC-201 IIIA, IIIB May 2000 Atlas IIIB X/Y AC-204 2/2 X Successes / Y FlightsFeb 2002 Atlas V-400 AV-001 4/4 Mission Success: One Launch at a Time 4/4 Aug 2002 Atlas V-500 AV-003 4/4 Jul 2003 3/3 3 RecentRecent AtlasAtlas // CentaurCentaur EvolutionEvolution Atlas I / II Family Atlas III Family Atlas V Family dd dd iirree iirree eett eett RR RR 5-m PLF 30 GSO Kit 26 Single Avionics Engine Common Upgrade 22 Centaur Centaur 3.8-m 18 Common LO2 Core Tank Booster Stretch 14 10 Liquid SRBs Strap-ons RD-180 SRBs 6 Engine Atlas I Atlas IIAS Atlas IIIA Atlas IIIB Atlas V Atlas V Atlas V 407
    [Show full text]
  • Information Summary Assurance in Lieu of the Requirement for the Launch Service Provider Apollo Spacecraft to the Moon
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s Launch Services Program he Launch Services Program was established for mission success. at Kennedy Space Center for NASA’s acquisi- The principal objectives are to provide safe, reli- tion and program management of Expendable able, cost-effective and on-schedule processing, mission TLaunch Vehicle (ELV) missions. A skillful NASA/ analysis, and spacecraft integration and launch services contractor team is in place to meet the mission of the for NASA and NASA-sponsored payloads needing a Launch Services Program, which exists to provide mission on ELVs. leadership, expertise and cost-effective services in the The Launch Services Program is responsible for commercial arena to satisfy Agencywide space trans- NASA oversight of launch operations and countdown portation requirements and maximize the opportunity management, providing added quality and mission information summary assurance in lieu of the requirement for the launch service provider Apollo spacecraft to the Moon. to obtain a commercial launch license. The powerful Titan/Centaur combination carried large and Primary launch sites are Cape Canaveral Air Force Station complex robotic scientific explorers, such as the Vikings and Voyag- (CCAFS) in Florida, and Vandenberg Air Force Base (VAFB) in ers, to examine other planets in the 1970s. Among other missions, California. the Atlas/Agena vehicle sent several spacecraft to photograph and Other launch locations are NASA’s Wallops Island flight facil- then impact the Moon. Atlas/Centaur vehicles launched many of ity in Virginia, the North Pacific’s Kwajalein Atoll in the Republic of the larger spacecraft into Earth orbit and beyond. the Marshall Islands, and Kodiak Island in Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts
    Federal Aviation Administration 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts May 2013 FAA Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) • i • 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover: The Orbital Sciences Corporation’s Antares rocket is seen as it launches from Pad-0A of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, Sunday, April 21, 2013. Image Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 COMSTAC 2013 COMMERCIAL GEOSYNCHRONOUS ORBIT LAUNCH DEMAND FORECAST .
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    THE CAPE Military Space Operations 1971-1992 by Mark C. Cleary 45th Space Wing History Office Table of Contents Preface Chapter I -USAF Space Organizations and Programs Table of Contents Section 1 - Air Force Systems Command and Subordinate Space Agencies at Cape Canaveral Section 2 - The Creation of Air Force Space Command and Transfer of Air Force Space Resources Section 3 - Defense Department Involvement in the Space Shuttle Section 4 - Air Force Space Launch Vehicles: SCOUT, THOR, ATLAS and TITAN Section 5 - Early Space Shuttle Flights Section 6 - Origins of the TITAN IV Program Section 7 - Development of the ATLAS II and DELTA II Launch Vehicles and the TITAN IV/CENTAUR Upper Stage Section 8 - Space Shuttle Support of Military Payloads Section 9 - U.S. and Soviet Military Space Competition in the 1970s and 1980s Chapter II - TITAN and Shuttle Military Space Operations Section 1 - 6555th Aerospace Test Group Responsibilities Section 2 - Launch Squadron Supervision of Military Space Operations in the 1990s Section 3 - TITAN IV Launch Contractors and Eastern Range Support Contractors Section 4 - Quality Assurance and Payload Processing Agencies Section 5 - TITAN IIIC Military Space Missions after 1970 Section 6 - TITAN 34D Military Space Operations and Facilities at the Cape Section 7 - TITAN IV Program Activation and Completion of the TITAN 34D Program Section 8 - TITAN IV Operations after First Launch Section 9 - Space Shuttle Military Missions Chapter III - Medium and Light Military Space Operations Section 1 - Medium Launch Vehicle and Payload Operations Section 2 - Evolution of the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System and Development of the DELTA II Section 3 - DELTA II Processing and Flight Features Section 4 - NAVSTAR II Global Positioning System Missions Section 5 - Strategic Defense Initiative Missions and the NATO IVA Mission Section 6 - ATLAS/CENTAUR Missions at the Cape Section 7 - Modification of Cape Facilities for ATLAS II/CENTAUR Operations Section 8 - ATLAS II/CENTAUR Missions Section 9 - STARBIRD and RED TIGRESS Operations Section 10 - U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Space Launch Vehicles Used by The
    Current Space Launch Vehicles Used by the HEET United States S Nathan Daniels April 2014 At present, the United States relies on Russian rocket engines to launch satellites ACT into space. F The U.S. also relies on Russia to transport its astronauts to the International Space Station (as the U.S. Space Shuttle program ended in 2011). Not only does this reliance have direct implications for our launch capabilities, but it also means that we are funding Russian space and missile technology while we could be investing in U.S. based jobs and the defense industrial base. These facts raises national security concerns, as the United States’ relationship with Russia is ever-changing - the situation in Ukraine is a prime example. This paper serves as a brief, but factual overview of active launch vehicles used by the United States. First, are the three vehicles with the payload capability to launch satellites into orbit: the Atlas V, Delta IV, and the Falcon 9. The other active launch vehicles will follow in alphabetical order. www.AmericanSecurityProject.org 1100 New York Avenue, NW Suite 710W Washington, DC AMERICAN SECURITY PROJECT Atlas Launch Vehicle History and the Current Atlas V • Since its debut in 1957 as America’s first operational intercon- tinental ballistic missile (ICBM) designed by the Convair Divi- sion of General Dynamics, the Atlas family of launch vehicles has logged nearly 600 flights. • The missiles saw brief ICBM service, and the last squadron was taken off of operational alert in 1965. • From 1962 to 1963, Atlas boosters launched the first four Ameri- can astronauts to orbit the Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • What Makes an Affordable and Reliable Launch System 2006-7210
    What Makes An Affordable and Reliable Launch System? Corresponding Author Last Name: Holguin AIAA-2006-7210 Session: 49-SE-3 The Space Operations Community: Other Views and Experiences The Atlas and Centaur Programs have enjoyed a rich history as the trusted vehicle of choice for America’s satellite programs. During that course of space launch development, the Atlas Expendable Launch vehicles have matured in both reliability and cost of operation of the system, due to evolutionary improvements that factored in all aspects of the mission, from design to manufacturing (including subcontractors) to assembly and test to operational launch. Launch costs have been reduced by over 50% from heritage Atlas, and launch turnaround from months to weeks. The flight proven Atlas has successfully launched payloads 79 consecutive times to their earth-synchronous or solar system bound trajectories, with increasing accuracy and reliability, lower cost and improved launch on time records. During the maturation from Atlas I to Atlas V, 8 evolutionary Atlas first flight vehicle configurations on 3 new or significantly modified launch pads provided a pathway to reduce cost and improve operational aspects of the launch system as a whole. Atlas I Atlas II Atlas IIA Atlas IIAS Atlas IIIA Atlas IIIB Atlas V-400 Atlas V-500 AC-69 AC-102 AC-105 AC-108 AC-201 AC-204 AV-001 AV-003 The Atlas Evolutionary approach has successfully proven all 8 of 8 first flight vehicle configurations, with a current flight record of 77 consecutive successes. This paper will address the evolutionary path that the Atlas Centaur program took to accomplish the goals of significantly reduced cost while improving all other aspects of the launch system.
    [Show full text]