Making the Invisible Visible: a History of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003)/ by Renee M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Making the Invisible Visible: a History of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003)/ by Renee M MAKING THE INVISIBLE A History of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003) MONOGRAPHS IN AEROSPACE HISTORY, NO. 47 Renee M. Rottner MAKING THE INVISIBLE VISIBLE A History of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003) MONOGRAPHS IN AEROSPACE HISTORY, NO. 47 Renee M. Rottner National Aeronautics and Space Administration Office of Communications NASA History Division Washington, DC 20546 NASA SP-2017-4547 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Rottner, Renee M., 1967– Title: Making the invisible visible: a history of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003)/ by Renee M. Rottner. Other titles: History of the Spitzer Infrared Telescope Facility (1971–2003) Description: | Series: Monographs in aerospace history; #47 | Series: NASA SP; 2017-4547 | Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: LCCN 2012013847 Subjects: LCSH: Spitzer Space Telescope (Spacecraft) | Infrared astronomy. | Orbiting astronomical observatories. | Space telescopes. Classification: LCC QB470 .R68 2012 | DDC 522/.2919—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2012013847 ON THE COVER Front: Giant star Zeta Ophiuchi and its effects on the surrounding dust clouds Back (top left to bottom right): Orion, the Whirlpool Galaxy, galaxy NGC 1292, RCW 49 nebula, the center of the Milky Way Galaxy, “yellow balls” in the W33 Star forming region, Helix Nebula, spiral galaxy NGC 2841 This publication is available as a free download at http://www.nasa.gov/ebooks. ISBN 9781626830363 90000 > 9 781626 830363 Contents v Acknowledgments vii List of Figures and Tables xi Introduction 1 CHAPTER 1 Ancient Views 13 CHAPTER 2 Getting Infrared Astronomy Off the Ground 29 CHAPTER 3 Making the Case for SIRTF 41 CHAPTER 4 SIRTF as a Shuttle-Based Infrared Telescope 61 CHAPTER 5 Selling It 83 CHAPTER 6 Out of Step 101 CHAPTER 7 From Orphan to Poster Child 117 CHAPTER 8 Constructing SIRTF 137 CHAPTER 9 Making the Invisible Visible 153 APPENDIX A Contributors to SIRTF 159 Bibliography 173 The NASA History Series 183 Index iii Acknowledgments ver a thousand people helped make the the Ames archives, especially Glenn Bugos and OSpace Infrared Telescope Facility (SIRTF) April Gage, and the staff of the Headquarters a reality. Dozens more helped make this mono- Historical Reference Collection, especially Colin graph a reality. But one person stands out—nei- Fries and Jane Odom, all of whom helped me ther this monograph nor SIRTF would have been find—and make sense of—the mountains of possible without the unflagging support of Mike materials available on a major telescope project. Werner (Jet Propulsion Laboratory)—I dedicate Many thanks to the people who helped me this monograph to him. to reduce that mountain of material into a read- I would like to express my gratitude to able manuscript: Sara Lippincott (Pasadena), the people who gave of their time to be inter- editor and fact-checker extraordinaire; Julia Kim viewed for this history: Fred Witteborn (Ames) (New York University) for archive assistance; and imagined SIRTF before the technology existed, the anonymous peer reviewers who commented while Giovanni Fazio (Harvard-Smithsonian on early drafts. At the NASA History Division, Astrophysical Observatory), Jim Houck thanks to Chief Historian Bill Barry, former (Cornell), and George Rieke (Arizona) made that Chief Historian Steve Dick, and Steve Garber for technology real. shepherding this project through to completion. Bob Gehrz (Minnesota), Lawrence “Larry” To guide my efforts in crafting a history, Manning (Ames), and Charlie Pellerin and Harley I thank David DeVorkin (National Air and Thronson (NASA Headquarters) went above and Space Museum), Patrick McCray (University beyond, being incredibly generous with their of California [UC], Santa Barbara), and Robert time and contacts. Martin Harwit (Cornell) and Smith (University of Alberta) for writing other Dan Weedman (Penn State) provided extremely books that were not only valuable secondary useful historical perspective. source materials, but excellent models. And I Although many more people helped make thank my colleague, Kenji Klein (UC Irvine/ SIRTF possible, I’d like to thank a few who California State University, Long Beach), who agreed to be interviewed. From Ames: Michael showed me the possibilities of history as a tool Bicay, Craig McCreight, Ramsey Melugin, and for social science research. Lou Young. From JPL: Dave Gallagher, Bill Thanks are also due to a number of talented Irace, Johnny Kwok, Charles Lawrence, Larry professionals who helped bring this project from Simmons, and Bob Wilson. From Headquarters: manuscript to finished publication. Editors Nancy Boggess, Lawrence “Larry” Caroff, and Emily Dressler and Yvette Smith did excellent Frank Martin. From outside of NASA: Eric work preparing the manuscript for publica- Becklin (University of California, Los Angeles), tion. In the Communications Support Service Tim Kelly (Ball Aerospace), Marcia Rieke Center (CSSC), Mary Tonkinson, Lisa Jirousek, (Arizona), and Tom Soifer (Caltech). Chinenye Okparanta, and J. Andrew Cooke care- Monographs are not just written by those fully copyedited the text; Michele Ostovar did an listed as the author. I am grateful to the staff of expert job laying out the beautiful design and v vi Making the Invisible Visible creating the e-book version; Kristin Harley thor- (UC-Irvine/University of Maryland) for guiding oughly indexed our work; and printing specialist this project as a dissertation and monograph, as Tun Hla made sure the traditional hard copies well as Barbara Lawrence (UCLA) for introduc- were printed to exacting standards. Supervisors ing me to the SIRTF project team and Cristina Barbara Bullock and Maxine Aldred helped by Gibson (UC-Irvine/University of Western overseeing all of this CSSC production work. Australia) for introducing me to Barbara. Thank Last but certainly not least, I thank my aca- you so much for all your mentorship. demic colleagues, especially Christine Beckman List of Figures and Tables Figure 1.1. In Johannes Hevelius’s Firmamentum Figure 1.8. The spectroscopy experiment and Sobiescianum sive Uranographia (Gdansk, rocket (The Jesse Greenstein Papers, Caltech 1690), the figure of Orion is drawn as if look- Archives, Photo ID JLG50.9-1). ing from the heavens toward Earth. Thus, the Figure 1.9. Jesse L. Greenstein in front of the stars appear as mirror images of ground-based Palomar Observatory, 1965 (Leigh Wiener, observations. For more details, see Nick Kanas, Caltech Archives, Photo ID 10.12-13). Star Maps: History, Artistry, and Cartography, Figure 2.1. Dr. Nancy Grace Roman, NASA’s first 2nd ed. (New York: Springer, 2009). Chief of Astronomy, with a model of the Figure 1.2. The Constellation of Orion (Akira Orbiting Solar Observatory, c. 1963 (NASA Fujii, Space Telescope Science Institute for 63-OSO-1). NASA, Photo ID STScI-2006-01). Figure 2.2. Experiments on the OSO-1 mission, Figure 1.3. “Messier Object 42,” illustration of reproduced from J. Lindsay et al., Orbiting Orion Nebula published in an addition to Solar Observatory Satellite OSO I: The Project the first version of the Messier Catalog in Summary (Washington, DC: NASA SP-57, the Mémoires de l’Académie Royale for 1771 1965), p. 2, Fig. 1.2. (Paris, 1774), pp. 460–461. The image has Figure 2.3. Comparison of wavelengths in the been rotated; the original orientation can be electromagnetic spectrum, reproduced here viewed online at http://messier.seds.org/xtra/ from http://science.hq.nasa.gov/kids/imagers/ems/ history/m-m31_42.html (accessed 30 August ems_length_final.gif (accessed 30 August 2016). 2016); see also http://messier.seds.org/m/m042. Table 2.1. Coolants used in infrared astronomy html and http://messier.seds.org/. were compiled by the author. The values for Figure 1.4. “M42: The Orion Nebula (widefield),” each chemical are from P. J. Linstrom and W. 2004 (A. Block and R. Steinberg, National Mallard (2014). NIST Chemistry WebBook, Optical Astronomy Observatory, Photo ID NIST Standard Reference Database Number NOAO-m42steinberg). 69 (National Institute of Standards and Figure 1.5. “The Infrared Hunter,” 2006 (Tom Technology, Gaithersburg MD, 2014). Megeath, University of Toledo for NASA/ Available online at http://webbook.nist.gov/ JPL-Caltech/Spitzer Science Center, Photo chemistry/ (accessed 30 August 2016). ID ssc2006-16c). Figure 2.4. The telemetry van constructed by Figure 1.6. The Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, Giovanni Fazio and Henry Helmken of the reproduced here from “Life Cycles of Stars” Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (EG-1997(09)-004-GSFC), available at and used during the 1960s at the National http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/educators/lifecycles/ Scientific Balloon Facility in Palestine, TX, Imagine2.pdf (accessed 30 August 2016). to record data from their high-altitude, Figure 1.7. Yerkes Observatory staff, May 1946. balloon-borne gamma-ray telescope. Fazio This photograph is reproduced by permission presented this photograph from his personal from the University of Chicago. files at the 37th Committee on Space Research vii viii Making the Invisible Visible Scientific Assembly in Montreal, Canada, drawing notes that helium gas vents, a remov- in a lecture titled “Flying High-Altitude able vacuum cover, and a ‘finder scope with Balloon-Borne Telescopes 50 Years Ago,” TV’ are not shown.” delivered on Tuesday, 15 July 2008, in session Figure 4.2. Specification of possible SIRTF design PSB1 (Scientific Ballooning: Recent Devel- and instrument suite, c. 1973, reproduced opments in Technology and Instrumentation: from the Final Report of the Space Shuttle Reminiscences). Payload Planning Working Groups, Volume 1: Table 2.2. Reproduced from U.S. Space Science Astronomy (Greenbelt, MD: NASA Goddard Board, Space Research: Directions for the Space Flight Center, 1973), p. 8. Future. Report of a Study by the Space Science Figure 4.3. Design for SIRTF as a Shuttle-attached Board, Woods Hole, MA, NRC Pub. 1403 payload, c. 1980, reproduced from Fred C. (Washington, DC: National Academy of Witteborn, Michael W. Werner, and Lou S. Sciences, 1966), pp. 346–347. Young, “Astrophysics Near-Term Program.
Recommended publications
  • 2016-2017 Year Book Www
    1 2016-2017 YEAR BOOK WWW. C A R N E G I E S C I E N C E . E D U Department of Embryology 3520 San Martin Dr. / Baltimore, MD 21218 410.246.3001 Geophysical Laboratory 5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. / Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8900 Department of Global Ecology 260 Panama St. / Stanford, CA 94305-4101 650.462.1047 The Carnegie Observatories 813 Santa Barbara St. / Pasadena, CA 91101-1292 626.577.1122 Las Campanas Observatory Casilla 601 / La Serena, Chile Department of Plant Biology 260 Panama St. / Stanford, CA 94305-4101 650.325.1521 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism 5241 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. / Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8820 Office of Administration 1530 P St., N.W. / Washington, DC 20005-1910 202.387.6400 2 0 1 6 - 2 0 1 7 Y E A R B O O K The President’s Report July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2017 C A R N E G I E I N S T I T U T I O N F O R S C I E N C E Former Presidents Daniel C. Gilman, 1902–1904 Robert S. Woodward, 1904–1920 John C. Merriam, 1921–1938 Vannevar Bush, 1939–1955 Caryl P. Haskins, 1956–1971 Philip H. Abelson, 1971–1978 James D. Ebert, 1978–1987 Edward E. David, Jr. (Acting President, 1987–1988) Maxine F. Singer, 1988–2002 Michael E. Gellert (Acting President, Jan.–April 2003) Richard A. Meserve, 2003–2014 Former Trustees Philip H. Abelson, 1978–2004 Patrick E.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Galactic Center
    Exploring the V Galactic Center Goinyk/Shutterstock.com olodymyr A case study of how USRA answered a question posed by James Webb in 1966. On 14 January 1966, NASA (5) C r e Administrator James Webb (1906-1992) wrote a letter d i Should we change the t : N to the prominent Harvard physicist, Professor Norman A orientation of some of S F. Ramsey Jr. (1915-2011), asking him to establish an A our NASA Centers? advisory group that would: (6) What steps should Review the resources at our NASA field centers, and James Webb be taken in scientific such other institutions as would be appropriate, staffing, both inside and against the requirements of the next generation of outside NASA, over the next few years to assure that space projects and advise NASA on a number of key we have the proper people at the proper places to do problems, such as: the job? (1) How can we organize these major projects so that (7) How can we obtain the competent scientists to the most competent scientists and engineers can take the key roles in these major projects? 1 participate? Ramsey assembled his advisory group, and they (2) How can academic personnel participate and at worked through the spring and summer on their report, the same time continue in strong academic roles? which they delivered to the Administrator on 15 August 1966. Their first recommendation was that the NASA (3) What mechanism should be used to determine Administrator appoint a General Advisory Committee the scientific investigations which should be to bring to bear “maximum competence” on “the conducted? formulation and execution of long-term programs of NASA.”2 (4) How does a scientist continue his career development during the six to eight years it requires This recommendation, and many of the others in the to develop an ABL [Automated Biological Laboratory] report, were not what NASA was looking for, and so or a large astronomical facility? the Administrator turned to the National Academy of Sciences to find answers for at least some of the Infrared radiation gets Cr ed i t: A questions posed to Ramsey.
    [Show full text]
  • To Serve at the Pleasure of the President
    2 Update Endeavour Vol.33 No.1 publishing, church reform, professionalization, gender into the world of Victorian science publishing offer import- dynamics, visual spectacle and social change, and he ant lessons for our own era’s continuing struggle with the makes substantial contributions to understanding the question of scientific authority. relationship between those matters and science. Histor- ians interested in any of these issues will find this book 0160-9327/$ – see front matter ß 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. enriching and thought provoking. The author’s insights doi:10.1016/j.endeavour.2009.01.001 Book Review To serve at the pleasure of the President In Sputnik’s Shadow: The President’s Science Advisory Committee and Cold War America by Zouyue Wang, Rutgers University Press (2008), 455 pp. + xix, $49.95, ISBN 978-0-8135-4331-4 Rena Selya* Department of History, UCLA, 6265 Bunche Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1473, USA In Sputnik’s Shadow is a comprehensive 1957. Even before Sputnik, he had relied heavily on the history of the President’s Science Advisory Office of Defense Mobilization Science Advisory Commit- Committee (PSAC) from its 1957 incep- tee and its various studies and panels for guidance, and tion by President Eisenhower to its dis- many of the members of ODM-SAC were invited to join solution by President Nixon in 1973. In PSAC. Although their first tasks were focused narrowly on Zouyue Wang’s detailed account, the Pre- restoring American scientific prestige after the embar- sident, the individual members of the rassment of Sputnik, PSAC soon became Eisenhower’s Committee and the chair, who was the source for clear advice on matters that were not strictly President’s special assistant for science scientific.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW ARTICLE the NASA Spitzer Space Telescope
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 78, 011302 ͑2007͒ REVIEW ARTICLE The NASA Spitzer Space Telescope ͒ R. D. Gehrza Department of Astronomy, School of Physics and Astronomy, 116 Church Street, S.E., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 ͒ T. L. Roelligb NASA Ames Research Center, MS 245-6, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000 ͒ M. W. Wernerc Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, MS 264-767, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109 ͒ G. G. Faziod Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 ͒ J. R. Houcke Astronomy Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-6801 ͒ F. J. Lowf Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85721 ͒ G. H. Riekeg Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, Arizona 85721 ͒ ͒ B. T. Soiferh and D. A. Levinei Spitzer Science Center, MC 220-6, California Institute of Technology, 1200 East California Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91125 ͒ E. A. Romanaj Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, MS 264-767, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, California 91109 ͑Received 2 June 2006; accepted 17 September 2006; published online 30 January 2007͒ The National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Spitzer Space Telescope ͑formerly the Space Infrared Telescope Facility͒ is the fourth and final facility in the Great Observatories Program, joining Hubble Space Telescope ͑1990͒, the Compton Gamma-Ray Observatory ͑1991–2000͒, and the Chandra X-Ray Observatory ͑1999͒. Spitzer, with a sensitivity that is almost three orders of magnitude greater than that of any previous ground-based and space-based infrared observatory, is expected to revolutionize our understanding of the creation of the universe, the formation and evolution of primitive galaxies, the origin of stars and planets, and the chemical evolution of the universe.
    [Show full text]
  • Edwin Powell Hubble Papers: Finding Aid
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf7b69n8rd Online items available Edwin Powell Hubble Papers: Finding Aid Processed by Ronald S. Brashear, completed December 12, 1997; machine-readable finding aid created by Xiuzhi Zhou and updated by Diann Benti in June 2017. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © 1998 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Edwin Powell Hubble Papers: mssHUB 1-1098 1 Finding Aid Overview of the Collection Title: Edwin Powell Hubble Papers Dates (inclusive): 1900-1989 Collection Number: mssHUB 1-1098 Creator: Hubble, Edwin, 1889-1953. Extent: 1300 pieces, plus ephemera in 34 boxes Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: This collection contains the papers of Edwin P. Hubble (1889-1953), an astronomer at the Mount Wilson Observatory near Pasadena, California. as well as the diaries and biographical memoirs of his wife, Grace Burke Hubble. Language: English. Access Open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, contact Reader Services. Publication Rights The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities. The responsibility for identifying the copyright holder, if there is one, and obtaining necessary permissions rests with the researcher. Preferred Citation [Identification of item].
    [Show full text]
  • Spiral Galaxy HI Models, Rotation Curves and Kinematic Classifications
    Spiral galaxy HI models, rotation curves and kinematic classifications Theresa B. V. Wiegert A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Canada 2010 Copyright (c) 2010 by Theresa B. V. Wiegert Abstract Although galaxy interactions cause dramatic changes, galaxies also continue to form stars and evolve when they are isolated. The dark matter (DM) halo may influence this evolu- tion since it generates the rotational behaviour of galactic disks which could affect local conditions in the gas. Therefore we study neutral hydrogen kinematics of non-interacting, nearby spiral galaxies, characterising their rotation curves (RC) which probe the DM halo; delineating kinematic classes of galaxies; and investigating relations between these classes and galaxy properties such as disk size and star formation rate (SFR). To generate the RCs, we use GalAPAGOS (by J. Fiege). My role was to test and help drive the development of this software, which employs a powerful genetic algorithm, con- straining 23 parameters while using the full 3D data cube as input. The RC is here simply described by a tanh-based function which adequately traces the global RC behaviour. Ex- tensive testing on artificial galaxies show that the kinematic properties of galaxies with inclination > 40 ◦, including edge-on galaxies, are found reliably. Using a hierarchical clustering algorithm on parametrised RCs from 79 galaxies culled from literature generates a preliminary scheme consisting of five classes. These are based on three parameters: maximum rotational velocity, turnover radius and outer slope of the RC.
    [Show full text]
  • April Constellations of the Month
    April Constellations of the Month Leo Small Scope Objects: Name R.A. Decl. Details M65! A large, bright Sa/Sb spiral galaxy. 7.8 x 1.6 arc minutes, magnitude 10.2. Very 11hr 18.9m +13° 05’ (NGC 3623) high surface brighness showing good detail in medium sized ‘scopes. M66! Another bright Sb galaxy, only 21 arc minutes from M65. Slightly brighter at mag. 11hr 20.2m +12° 59’ (NGC 3627) 9.7, measuring 8.0 x 2.5 arc minutes. M95 An easy SBb barred spiral, 4 x 3 arc minutes in size. Magnitude 10.5, with 10hr 44.0m +11° 42’ a bright central core. The bar and outer ring of material will require larger (NGC 3351) aperature and dark skies. M96 Another bright Sb spiral, about 42 arc minutes east of M95, but larger and 10hr 46.8m +11° 49’ (NGC 3368) brighter. 6 x 4 arc minutes, magnitude 10.1. Located about 48 arc minutes NNE of M96. This small elliptical galaxy measures M105 only 2 x 2.1 arc minutes, but at mag. 10.3 has very high surface brightness. 10hr 47.8m +12° 35’ (NGC 3379) Look for NGC 3384! (110NGC) and NGC 3389 (mag 11.0 and 12.2) which form a small triangle with M105. NGC 3384! 10hr 48.3m +12° 38’ See comment for M105. The brightest galaxy in Leo, this Sb/Sc spiral galaxy shines at mag. 9.5. Look for NGC 2903!! 09hr 32.2m +21° 30’ a hazy patch 11 x 4.7 arc minutes in size 1.5° south of l Leonis.
    [Show full text]
  • L AUNCH SYSTEMS Databk7 Collected.Book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM Databk7 Collected.Book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM
    databk7_collected.book Page 17 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS databk7_collected.book Page 18 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM databk7_collected.book Page 19 Monday, September 14, 2009 2:53 PM CHAPTER TWO L AUNCH SYSTEMS Introduction Launch systems provide access to space, necessary for the majority of NASA’s activities. During the decade from 1989–1998, NASA used two types of launch systems, one consisting of several families of expendable launch vehicles (ELV) and the second consisting of the world’s only partially reusable launch system—the Space Shuttle. A significant challenge NASA faced during the decade was the development of technologies needed to design and implement a new reusable launch system that would prove less expensive than the Shuttle. Although some attempts seemed promising, none succeeded. This chapter addresses most subjects relating to access to space and space transportation. It discusses and describes ELVs, the Space Shuttle in its launch vehicle function, and NASA’s attempts to develop new launch systems. Tables relating to each launch vehicle’s characteristics are included. The other functions of the Space Shuttle—as a scientific laboratory, staging area for repair missions, and a prime element of the Space Station program—are discussed in the next chapter, Human Spaceflight. This chapter also provides a brief review of launch systems in the past decade, an overview of policy relating to launch systems, a summary of the management of NASA’s launch systems programs, and tables of funding data. The Last Decade Reviewed (1979–1988) From 1979 through 1988, NASA used families of ELVs that had seen service during the previous decade.
    [Show full text]
  • The SOFIA Science and Mission Operations Center
    A Publication of the Universities Space Research Association Summer 2005 Edition • www.usra.edu THE SOFIA SCIENCE AND MISSION OPERATIONS CENTER Hangar N211 at NASA Ames is Home of Airborne Astronomy Next year, the modified 747SP that is the Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy will fly from Waco, Texas to Moffett Federal Airfield and the NASA Ames Research Center in California’s Santa Clara Valley. There, SOFIA will roll into its permanent new home: Hangar N211, the Above: Moffett Federal SOFIA Science Airfield and the NASA Ames and Mission Research Center. SOFIA’s Operations new home, Hangar N211 Center. Over the is highlighted. Dominating the landscape is Hangar last few years, One, built for the massive as the aircraft Navy airship USS Macon. has undergone Highway 101, connecting extensive San Francisco and San modifications Jose, cuts through right of photo. Water at upper left is that allow a southernmost fringe of the it to now San Francisco Bay. At left is accommodate a front view of N211. a 2.5-meter telescope in a vibration- isolated cavity that opens to the heavens, the building that Inside will house the aircraft and all associated operations 4 Hangar Floor Plan has been going through its own substantial 5 Why Moffett Field? alterations. In N211, the 6 Mirror Stripping and SOFIA aircraft will be Coating Rooms virtually surrounded by the people who make the missions happen – 8 SOFIA Team at Ames scientists, engineers, flight crews, mechanics, 9 Germans at the SSMOC education and outreach specialists, and database experts. The building also houses 9 Aircraft Update laboratories for readying and checking out instruments, facilities for stripping and coating the telescope’s primary mirror, flight operations rooms where missions 10 Preflight Integration Facility are planned, and education areas for students and teachers discovering airborne 10 SOFIA E/PO astronomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Telescopes and Binoculars
    Continuing Education Course Approved by the American Board of Opticianry Telescopes and Binoculars National Academy of Opticianry 8401 Corporate Drive #605 Landover, MD 20785 800-229-4828 phone 301-577-3880 fax www.nao.org Copyright© 2015 by the National Academy of Opticianry. All rights reserved. No part of this text may be reproduced without permission in writing from the publisher. 2 National Academy of Opticianry PREFACE: This continuing education course was prepared under the auspices of the National Academy of Opticianry and is designed to be convenient, cost effective and practical for the Optician. The skills and knowledge required to practice the profession of Opticianry will continue to change in the future as advances in technology are applied to the eye care specialty. Higher rates of obsolescence will result in an increased tempo of change as well as knowledge to meet these changes. The National Academy of Opticianry recognizes the need to provide a Continuing Education Program for all Opticians. This course has been developed as a part of the overall program to enable Opticians to develop and improve their technical knowledge and skills in their chosen profession. The National Academy of Opticianry INSTRUCTIONS: Read and study the material. After you feel that you understand the material thoroughly take the test following the instructions given at the beginning of the test. Upon completion of the test, mail the answer sheet to the National Academy of Opticianry, 8401 Corporate Drive, Suite 605, Landover, Maryland 20785 or fax it to 301-577-3880. Be sure you complete the evaluation form on the answer sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas Launch System Mission Planner's Guide, Atlas V Addendum
    ATLAS Atlas Launch System Mission Planner’s Guide, Atlas V Addendum FOREWORD This Atlas V Addendum supplements the current version of the Atlas Launch System Mission Plan- ner’s Guide (AMPG) and presents the initial vehicle capabilities for the newly available Atlas V launch system. Atlas V’s multiple vehicle configurations and performance levels can provide the optimum match for a range of customer requirements at the lowest cost. The performance data are presented in sufficient detail for preliminary assessment of the Atlas V vehicle family for your missions. This guide, in combination with the AMPG, includes essential technical and programmatic data for preliminary mission planning and spacecraft design. Interface data are in sufficient detail to assess a first-order compatibility. This guide contains current information on Lockheed Martin’s plans for Atlas V launch services. It is subject to change as Atlas V development progresses, and will be revised peri- odically. Potential users of Atlas V launch service are encouraged to contact the offices listed below to obtain the latest technical and program status information for the Atlas V development. For technical and business development inquiries, contact: COMMERCIAL BUSINESS U.S. GOVERNMENT INQUIRIES BUSINESS INQUIRIES Telephone: (691) 645-6400 Telephone: (303) 977-5250 Fax: (619) 645-6500 Fax: (303) 971-2472 Postal Address: Postal Address: International Launch Services, Inc. Commercial Launch Services, Inc. P.O. Box 124670 P.O. Box 179 San Diego, CA 92112-4670 Denver, CO 80201 Street Address: Street Address: International Launch Services, Inc. Commercial Launch Services, Inc. 101 West Broadway P.O. Box 179 Suite 2000 MS DC1400 San Diego, CA 92101 12999 Deer Creek Canyon Road Littleton, CO 80127-5146 A current version of this document can be found, in electronic form, on the Internet at: http://www.ilslaunch.com ii ATLAS LAUNCH SYSTEM MISSION PLANNER’S GUIDE ATLAS V ADDENDUM (AVMPG) REVISIONS Revision Date Rev No.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2020
    NIKE The official publication of New NYork State Women, Inc. IKVOL. 70 n ISSUE 1 nE SEPTEMBER 2020 Our Mission To build powerful women personally, professionally, and politically. Our Vision To make a difference in the lives of working women. Are YOU a member of NYS Women, Inc. yet? yet? Inc. Women, a member of NYS YOU Are Time to check us out at nyswomeninc.org Time Dated Material — Deliver Promptly #NEWYORKTOUGH NYS Women, Inc. – The State of the State Clear vision, clear leadership. -Jacquie Shellman NYS Women, Inc. President, 2020/2021 First, thank you for supporting and We have held productive informative encouraging me during my 43 years of Zoom meetings about “Best Practices for membership. It is an honor to serve the Presidents & Treasurers;” training on women of New York State in this new holding your own Zoom meetings, how decade. A perk of this office is to write a to navigate our website, and navigating President’s Message for NIKE, the respect- Facebook. We have more sessions com- ed publication of an organization with ing. Most are all recorded and accessible 100-plus years of advocating for women. on our website at: www.nyswomeninc. To accomplish our goals, we need org/members/zoom meetings Clear Vision, Clear Leadership. We need to We are being positive and proactive, connect with you, our member, and those planning a Fall Board October 2-3, 2020 of you who are interested in our organi- at the Killian’s Event Center in Waterloo, zation. We know that this new decade is NY.
    [Show full text]