Sessional Diary 2008–09

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sessional Diary 2008–09 HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSIONAL DIARY 2008–09 3 December 2008 to 12 November 2009 Prepared in the Journal Office of the House of Commons INTRODUCTION 1. This diary records the business on which the House spent its time in Session 2008–09, analysed into categories, and similar information for sittings in Westminster Hall. It is intended mainly to provide information in response to statistical inquiries, and in using it the following points should be borne in mind: (a) The diary does not include business which took little or no time, such as presentations of bills, unopposed private business, and motions agreed to without debate or division. (b) Divisions are normally included with the business to which they relate. (c) Timings are taken from the Official Report, using the printed times where available, and otherwise taking a column of debate to last three minutes. Daily prayers are assumed to last a standard five minutes (and are not itemised in the analysis), and the time at which the House rose is taken from the Votes and Proceedings. (d) Periods of suspension are included in the total sitting time, and are listed in section 14h of the analysis (Miscellaneous). However, the 2½-hour suspension from 11.30 to 14.00 in Westminster Hall on most Tuesdays and Wednesdays (introduced on 1 January 2003) is shown in brackets in the “Duration” column and is left out of the totals. Other suspensions in Westminster Hall are included in the totals and in the analysis under section 5. (e) The times in the column headed “After appointed time” refer to business taken after the time appointed as the “moment of interruption”. In Session 2008–09, these times were as follows: Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 2200 2200 *1900 1800 1430 * 2200 on the day of the State Opening of Parliament and immediately following a periodic adjournment. (f) All times are in hours and minutes, using the 24-hour clock. 2. A Sessional Diary has been kept in the Journal Office for most sessions since 1906, although in the early years times were kept only to the nearest quarter hour. An analysis substantially in the current form begins in the 1960s. The totals from the analysis have been reproduced in the Sessional Information Digest since 1984–85 and in the House’s Sessional Returns since 1987–88. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS AND TOTALS Part Contents Duration After Page appointed time I Diary for House 2 II Analysis for House 1053.51 84.19 1. Addresses other than Prayers 31.35 1.54 91 2. Government bills 257.50 14.46 a Second readings: committed to standing 61.47 0.48 91 committee b Second readings: committal to Committee of 28.04 3.02 92 whole House (wholly or partly) c Second readings: no committal (Consolidation — — bills) d Committee of the whole House 43.17 7.11 92 e Consideration 77.53 0.49 93 f Third reading 9.04 0.43 93 g Lords amendments 28.38 0.58 94 h Allocation of time motions 8.11 0.57 94 i Committal and carry-over motions 0.56 0.18 95 3. Private Members’ bills 61.11 0.22 a Second readings (and all stages) 48.23 0.15 95 b Later stages 12.48 0.07 96 4. Private bills at time for opposed private business 3.56 — 96 5. Government motions 162.40 3.05 a European Union documents 5.32 — 96 b Business motions 1.55 0.13 97 c General 39.00 2.52 97 d General debates 100.01 — e Topical debates 16.12 — 6. Opposition business 127.18 6.30 a Opposition days 127.18 6.30 99 b Opposition motions in Government time — — 7. Private Members’ motions 16.54 0.07 a Substantive motions 8.12 0.07 100 b Ten-minute rule motions 8.42 — 101 8. Adjournment motions 85.12 49.29 a Government — — b Recess 15.55 0.01 102 c S.O. No. 24 debates — — iii Part Contents Duration After Page appointed time d Daily 69.17 49.28 102 9. Estimates 13.41 0.07 105 10. Money Resolutions 1.32 0.26 105 11. Ways and Means 22.44 1.21 105 12. Affirmative Statutory Instruments 12.30 0.18 106 13. Negative Statutory Instruments 7.07 — 106 14. Business when no Question before House 238.47 5.54 a Questions 91.37 — 106 b Topical Questions 21.45 — 110 c Urgent Questions 4.05 — 112 d Statements 65.08 2.13 112 e Business Statements 24.59 0.07 115 f S.O. No. 24 Applications 0.07 — 116 g Points of order 10.48 1.02 117 h Public petitions 3.02 2.24 143 i Miscellaneous 17.16 0.08 145 15. Daily prayers 10.54 — 146 III Diary for Westminster Hall 147 IV Analysis for Westminster Hall 337.48 — 1. Private Members’ Adjournment Debates 259.14 — 164 2. Government Adjournment Debates 15.01 — 170 3. Liaison Committee Adjournment Debates 52.27 — 170 4. Questions — — 5. Miscellaneous 11.06 — 171 iv PART I: DIARY FOR HOUSE 1 PART I: DIARY FOR HOUSE This page intentionally left blank 2 SESSIONAL DIARY, 2008–09 Time Subject Duration After appointed time 1. Wednesday 3rd December 2008 11.25 Prayers 0.05 11.30 Suspension 3.00 14.30 Speaker’s Statement: arrest and entry into the offices of the hon. Member for 0.07 Ashford 14.37 Points of Order: Mr Michael Howard: asking for an assurance that Members 0.15 taking part in the debate on the establishment of a committee to look into the arrest and entry into the offices of the hon. Member for Ashford would be free to question the conduct of Ministers, civil servants and the House authorities. Sir Menzies Campbell: asking for as assurance that the Committee, when established, would be entitled to have access to information from the Government, Members of Parliament, the police, and Officers of the House of Commons. John Reid: asking for the debate on the establishment of the Committee to consider both the rights and privileges of Parliament, and the fact that Members are not above the law. Damian Green: asking to make clear that he did not consider Members of Parliament to be above the law, but that it was not a crime to expose facts that Ministers would prefer to keep hidden. Mr Denis MacShane: asking for the debate to consider that a systematic breach of confidence in a Minister’s office destroys confidence in democratic government. Mr Iain Duncan Smith: asking for an assurance that the Executive would be asked to draft the motion for debate in a way that would take account of representations from both sides of the House. Mr David Winnick: asking that the senior police officers responsible for the entry into the offices of the hon. Member for Ashford be called to the bar of the House to explain their conduct. Mr Douglas Hogg: asking what powers were available to the House to call to account the senior police officers responsible for the arrest of the hon. Member for Ashford. Andrew Mackinlay: asking at what time the Clerk of the House or the Clerk Assistant were informed of the arrest of the hon. Member for Ashford. Sir Alan Beith: asking for an assurance that Officers of the House would be supported in protecting the rights of Members to communicate with their constituents in confidence. Tom Levitt: asking for an assertion by the Speaker on behalf of the House that Ministers have the right to expect loyalty and discretion from their staff. Sir Patrick Cormack: asking about the length of the debate on the establishment of the Committee to look into the arrest and entry into the offices of the hon. Member for Ashford. Mr George Howarth: asking for the Speaker to issue guidance on the terms in which the motion establishing the Committee should be debated. 14.52 Address: [1st Day] 0.45 15.37 Point of Order: John Reid: asking to point out that he had not supported the 0.01 arrest of a Member of Parliament, as had been suggested by the Leader of the Opposition. 15.38 Address: [1st Day] [resumed] 0.36 16.14 Points of Order: Mr Michael Howard: asking whether the Prime Minister was 0.02 criticising the content of the Speaker’s statement. Mr William Cash: asking for confirmation that the Speaker’s statement did not constitute a decision of the House itself. PART I: DIARY FOR HOUSE 3 Time Subject Duration After appointed time 16.16 Address: [1st Day] [resumed] 4.04 20.20 Point of Order: David Taylor: asking if there was a problem with the acoustics in 1.10 the Chamber. 21.30 Adjournment: David Wright: Health Services (Telford) 0.18 21.48 Point of Order: Mr William Cash: asking to be allowed to participate in the 0.01 Adjournment debate. 21.49 Adjournment: David Wright: Health Services (Telford) [resumed] 0.06 21.55 House rose [Totals for session: 10.30; 0.00] 10.30 0.00 2. Thursday 4th December 2008 10.30 Prayers 0.05 10.35 Business Statement: 0.46 11.21 Statement: The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Jacqui Smith): 1.00 Government Information (Unauthorised Release) 12.21 Points of Order: Damien Green: asking to correct the Home Secretary on the 0.10 wording of his arrest warrant. Mr Dominic Grieve: asking about the inadequacy of a document placed in the library for answering a question to the Home Secretary.
Recommended publications
  • Nutt Dismissal in Britain Highlights Diverging Drug Views
    NEWS Testy debate: Looking ahead: 2009 in review: Biomarkers for Warwick Anderson We take a look prostate cancer discusses funding back at the past stir controversy in Australia year’s headlines 1339 1346 1348 Nutt dismissal in Britain highlights diverging drug views At a time when the US government has Jacqui Smith over a paper Nutt published in signaled a softer stance on medical marijuana, January on perceptions of risk that compared the dismissal of an independent drug advisor 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine in Britain has highlighted the UK’s hard-line (MDMA, or ‘ecstasy’) use to horse riding (J. stance on illegal substances. Psychopharmacol. 23, 3–5; 2009). David Nutt, until recently chair of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs Public dispute (ACMD), was fired by UK Home Secretary In a statement, Johnson claimed that Nutt’s Alan Johnson on 30 October. The sacking comments “damage efforts to give the public followed the issuing of a press release relating clear messages about the dangers of drugs.” to a lecture on drug risk and classification that Nutt, however, has hit back in a series of Nutt gave in July at King’s College London. interviews attacking the Labour government’s In his lecture, Nutt criticized the lack of approach to the issue of drugs. evidence for the current classification of drugs As Nature Medicine went to press, no less in the UK and claimed that this undermined than five members of the ACMD had resigned the credibility of the official message on drugs. in protest of Nutt’s dismissal.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing Terrorism Through Preemption: a Comparative Analysis of Radicalization in Three Western Liberal Democracies Derek M.D
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 2017 Governing Terrorism through Preemption: A Comparative Analysis of Radicalization in Three Western Liberal Democracies Derek M.D. Silva University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Silva, D. M.(2017). Governing Terrorism through Preemption: A Comparative Analysis of Radicalization in Three Western Liberal Democracies. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4278 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GOVERNING TERRORISM THROUGH PREEMPTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF RADICALIZATION IN THREE WESTERN LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES by Derek M.D. Silva Bachelor of Arts University of Ontario Institute of Technology, 2012 Master of Arts Carleton University, 2014 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2017 Accepted by: Mathieu Deflem, Major Professor Andrea K. Henderson, Committee Member Carla A. Pfeffer, Committee Member Wadie E. Said, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School © Copyright by Derek M.D. Silva, 2017 All Rights Reserved. ii DEDICATION For Ali, Gilmour, and Gator. Gilmour, you were my best friend and true companion. I will never, ever forget the memories we shared as a family. You will live on in my heart forever. Rest in peace my boy. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper, whose now infamous proclamation against “committing sociology” when considering issues of terrorism was in many ways the impetus for this project and my entire graduate research career.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour's Last Fling on Constitutional Reform
    | THE CONSTITUTION UNIT NEWSLETTER | ISSUE 43 | SEPTEMBER 2009 | MONITOR LABOUR’S LAST FLING ON CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM IN THIS ISSUE Gordon Brown’s bold plans for constitutional constitutional settlement …We will work with the reform continue to be dogged by bad luck and bad British people to deliver a radical programme of PARLIAMENT 2 - 3 judgement. The bad luck came in May, when the democratic and constitutional reform”. MPs’ expenses scandal engulfed Parliament and government and dominated the headlines for a Such rhetoric also defies political reality. There is EXECUTIVE 3 month. The bad judgement came in over-reacting a strict limit on what the government can deliver to the scandal, promising wide ranging reforms before the next election. The 2009-10 legislative which have nothing to do with the original mischief, session will be at most six months long. There PARTIES AND ELECTIONS 3-4 and which have limited hope of being delivered in is a risk that even the modest proposals in the the remainder of this Parliament. Constitutional Reform and Governance Bill will not pass. It was not introduced until 20 July, DEVOLUTION 4-5 The MPs’ expenses scandal broke on 8 May. As the day before the House rose for the summer the Daily Telegraph published fresh disclosures recess. After a year’s delay, the only significant day after day for the next 25 days public anger additions are Part 3 of the bill, with the next small HUMAN RIGHTS 5 mounted. It was not enough that the whole steps on Lords reform (see page 2); and Part 7, to issue of MPs’ allowances was already being strengthen the governance of the National Audit investigated by the Committee on Standards in Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Question Time ­ 20 April 2008
    Question Time ­ 20 April 2008 Questions 1. Foreign Secretary David Miliband has warned Labour that squabbling over what issue raises the risk of electoral defeat? ( )Introduction of the specialist diplomas ( )Abolition of the 10p income tax rate ( )Period of detention for terrorist suspects ( )Electoral reform 2. Parliament's longest-serving female MP has died aged 77. What is her name? ( )Dame Shirley Williams ( )Gwyneth Dunwoody ( )Baroness Castle ( )Baroness Boothroyd 3. Who was accused by the Conservatives of a "blatant breach" of Whitehall election rules by making a major government announcement in the period leading up to the 1 May elections? ( )Alistair Darling ( )Lord Jones ( )Jacqui Smith ( )David Miliband 4. Lord Jones has said that he will step down from Gordon Brown's "government of all the talents" before the next general election. What position does Lord Jones currently hold? ( )Transport Minister ( )Foreign Affairs Minister ( )Education Minister ( )Trade Minister 5. Who is the only independent candidate in the race to become London Mayor? ( )Winston Paddock ( )Boris Winstanley ( )Levi Kingstone ( )Winston McKenzie 6. Ahead of the local elections on 1 May, leader Nick Clegg has claimed that the Lib Dems are ... ( )"very much the national party" ( )"destined for a heavy defeat" ( )"on a hiding to nothing" ( )"back in their constituencies and prepared for government" 7. The High Court has ruled that the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) acted unlawfully by dropping a corruption inquiry into ... ( )Contracts to build new academy schools ( )A Saudi arms deal ( )MP's expenses ( )The Crossrail project 8. Which opening will Gordon Brown not be attending? ( )Terminal 5 ( )Beijing Olympics ( )Zimbabwe's new Parliament ( )Lloyd‐Webber's new version of Oliver 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey Report
    R YouGov/ Sunday Times Survey Results YouGov Sample Size: 1755 Fieldwork: 10th - 11th April 2008 For detailed results, click here % Headline Voting Intention [Excluding Don't Knows and Wouldn't Votes] Con 44 Lab 28 Lib Dem 17 Other 11 Do you think Gordon Brown is doing well or badly as prime minister? Very well 2 Fairly well 26 Fairly badly 37 Very badly 28 Don’t know 7 Do you think David Cameron is doing well or badly as Conservative leader? Very well 7 Fairly well 44 Fairly badly 27 Very badly 11 Don’t know 11 Do you think Nick Clegg is doing well or badly as leader of the Liberal Democrats? Very well 1 Fairly well 25 Fairly badly 24 Very badly 11 Don’t know 38 Do you think house prices in your area will rise or fall over the next 12 months? Rise by more than 10% 2 Rise by less than 10% 10 TOTAL RISE 12 Stay about the same 28 Fall by less than 10% 41 Fall by more than 10% 13 TOTAL FALL 54 Don’t know 6 Over the next 12 months do you think Britain's economy will... Grow at a faster rate than over the past 12 months 1 Grow at about the same rate 5 Grow more slowly 35 Not grow at all 28 Go into recession 26 Don't know 6 1 © 2008 YouGov plc. All Rights Reserved www.yougov.com R % YouGov How much do you trust Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling to lead Britain through the present financial crisis? Trust a lot 4 Trust to some extent 25 Do not trust much 30 Do not trust at all 36 Don’t know 6 Thinking about Prime Minister Gordon Brown which of the following qualities do you think he has? [Please tick all that apply.] Sticks to what he believes
    [Show full text]
  • X Marks the Box: How to Make Politics Work for You by Daniel Blythe
    Thank you for downloading the free ebook edition of X Marks the Box: How to Make Politics Work for You by Daniel Blythe. This edition is complete and unabridged. Please feel free to pass it on to anyone else you think would be interested. Follow Daniel on his blog at www.xmarksthebox.co.uk. The book is all about debate, of course – so get involved and tell Daniel and the world what you think there! The printed edition of X Marks the Box (ISBN 9781848310513), priced £7.99, is published on Thursday 4 March by Icon Books and will be available in all good bookstores – online and otherwise. And don’t forget to vote! www.xmarksthebox.co.uk I C O N B O O K S Published in the UK in 2010 by Icon Books Ltd, Omnibus Business Centre, 39–41 North Road, London N7 9DP email: [email protected] www.iconbooks.co.uk This electronic edition published in 2010 by Icon Books ISBN: 978-1-84831-180-0 (ePub format) ISBN: 978-1-84831-191-6 (Adobe ebook format) Printed edition (ISBN: 978-1-84831-051-3) sold in the UK, Europe, South Africa and Asia by Faber & Faber Ltd, Bloomsbury House, 74–77 Great Russell Street, London WC1B 3DA or their agents Printed edition distributed in the UK, Europe, South Africa and Asia by TBS Ltd, TBS Distribution Centre, Colchester Road, Frating Green, Colchester CO7 7DW Printed edition published in Australia in 2010 by Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd, PO Box 8500, 83 Alexander Street, Crows Nest, NSW 2065 Printed edition distributed in Canada by Penguin Books Canada, 90 Eglinton Avenue East, Suite 700, Toronto, Ontario M4P 2YE Text copyright © 2010 Daniel Blythe The author has asserted his moral rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Mps' Expenses and Allowances
    in Public Life on Standards Committee MPs’ expenses and allowances MPs’ expenses and allowances Supporting Parliament, safeguarding the taxpayer Committee on Standards in Public Life November 2009 November 2009 November Cm 7724 Twelfth Report Chair: Sir Christopher Kelly KCB Cm 7724 Spine Twelfth Report of the Committee on Standards in Public Life Chair: Sir Christopher Kelly KCB MPs’ expenses and allowances Supporting Parliament, safeguarding the taxpayer Report Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty November 2009 Cm 7724 £26.60 MPS’ exPeNSeS aNd aLLowaNCeS © Crown Copyright 2009 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please contact the Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected]. ISBN: 9780101772426 Printed in the UK for The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2332086 11/09 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. 2 PRefaCe Preface 4 November 2009 Revelations about the expenses regime in the House of Commons have corroded public trust in the integrity of Parliament. The reputation of individual MPs and confidence in the way we are governed have both been seriously damaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacqui (Jacqueline Anne) LAIT Conservative BECKENHAM Nov '97
    Jacqui (Jacqueline Anne) LAIT Conservative BECKENHAM Nov '97- Majority: 1,227 (3.8%) over Labour 8-way Description: The most compact of Bromley's three seats in southeast Greater London, on the Kent border; it contains Crystal Palace Park; its inner edge has more Labour and LibDem voters, while Tories are more numerous as it moves out toward suburbia and Kent; in '95 it acquired 15,000 Tory- leaning voters in the West Wickham wards from abolished Ravensbourne; neither as Beckenham nor as pre-'48 Bromley has it ever been out of Tory hands; Position: Social Security Spokesman '00-; ex: Whip '99, Assistant Whip '96-97; PPS, to William Hague '95-96; on Select Committees: on Science and Technology '98-99, Deregulation '98- 99, Catering '98-99; Secretary, Positive Europe Group '93-97; Chairman, British Section, European Union of Women '90-92; Chairman, City of London Conservatives '86-89; on: FHSA '89-91, City and East London Family Practitioners Committee '86-89; Outlook: Vigorous and personable lady politician and former lobbyist who retained Beckenham in the difficult by-election after scandal-blighted Piers Merchant stepped down; was John Major's first female Whip; rooted, realistic and commonsensical; a "conspicuous loyalist" and "ardent pro-European" (INDEPENDENT) sceptical about the Euro; one of the crusaders for independent taxation for married women and for an overhaul of the pension industry, partly from her own bad experiences on pension transfers; a longtime seat-chaser, she was "a first-class candidate" in Tyne Bridge in '85 who
    [Show full text]
  • Members 1979-2010
    Members 1979-2010 RESEARCH PAPER 10/33 28 April 2010 This Research Paper provides a complete list of all Members who have served in the House of Commons since the general election of 1979 to the dissolution of Parliament on 12 April 2010. The Paper also provides basic biographical and parliamentary data. The Library and House of Commons Information Office are frequently asked for such information and this Paper is based on the data we collate from published sources to assist us in responding. This Paper replaces an earlier version, Research Paper 09/31. Oonagh Gay Richard Cracknell Jeremy Hardacre Jean Fessey Recent Research Papers 10/22 Crime and Security Bill: Committee Stage Report 03.03.10 10/23 Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Bill [HL] [Bill 79 of 2009-10] 08.03.10 10/24 Local Authorities (Overview and Scrutiny) Bill: Committee Stage Report 08.03.10 10/25 Northern Ireland Assembly Members Bill [HL] [Bill 75 of 2009-10] 09.03.10 10/26 Debt Relief (Developing Countries) Bill: Committee Stage Report 11.03.10 10/27 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2010 17.03.10 10/28 Transport Policy in 2010: a rough guide 19.03.10 10/29 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2010/11 26.03.10 10/30 Digital Economy Bill [HL] [Bill 89 of 2009-10] 29.03.10 10/31 Economic Indicators, April 2010 06.04.10 10/32 Claimant Count Unemployment in the new (2010) Parliamentary 12.04.10 Constituencies Research Paper 10/33 Contributing Authors: Oonagh Gay, Parliament and Constitution Centre Richard Cracknell, Social and General Statistics Section Jeremy Hardacre, Statistics Resources Unit Jean Fessey, House of Commons Information Office This information is provided to Members of Parliament in support of their parliamentary duties and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any particular individual.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Season Service
    Recognising those whose generous donations at Bronze, Silver and Gold levels helped fund XH558’s final WALL OF HONOUR season service, allowing her to continue to be the world’s last flying Vulcan. 2014/15 Winter servicing: 1) Reinstalling engine 620392 in the number 3 position. This engine had been removed in 2008 due to a higher than permitted metal debris count in its oil. In collaboration with Marshall Aerospace and Rolls- Royce the Trust instigated a programme to attempt recovery. Having changed two gearboxes thought to be possible sources of the debris particles, the engine would be put through a thorough testing regime. 2) The exhaust end caps are removed for examination, and to access the jet pipes. 3) The first of four jets pipes to be removed and checked over. Here Steve Hands, Ray Watts, Rick Lee and Mark Brown take a well-earned rest after removing the jet pipe onto the special trolley stand. 4-5) Lifting the cockpit canopy to access the crew ejector seats for servicing. 6) Steve Hands strips and resprays some panels, with the primed canopy ready for repainting seen in the background. 7) Ray Watts carries out inspections on all the engine connections. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8) With the aircraft on jacks undercarriage retraction is tested. Photos by Paul Lindley, Andrew Hellen, Correne & Jim Calow. GOLD A DOWNIE ANDREW FELLOWS BORIS PERKINS CLIFFORD ROGERS DAVID FRENDO EDWIN FARRAR GRAHAM CRESWICK JAMES BROOKBANK Dr JOHN MUNN Cpl LEE RADCLIFFE MARTIN RADBON NEIL HOTCHIN PAUL THOMPSON RAYMOND ALSOP ROBERT MARRIOTT SPENCER HARBAR TIM
    [Show full text]
  • University of Huddersfield Repository
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by University of Huddersfield Repository University of Huddersfield Repository Hill, Michael The Parliamentary Conservative Party: The leadership elections of William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith Original Citation Hill, Michael (2007) The Parliamentary Conservative Party: The leadership elections of William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/741/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ The Parliamentary Conservative Party: The Leadership Elections of William Hague and Iain Duncan Smith Michael Hill A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Huddersfield Dedication This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my father, David Leyland Hill.
    [Show full text]