DOCSLIB.ORG

Feasibility of Diverting and Detaining Flood Water and Urban Storm Runoff, and the Enhancement of Natural Recharge

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Feasibility of Diverting and Detaining Flood Water and Urban Storm Runoff, and the Enhancement of Natural Recharge Feasibility of Diverting and Detaining Flood and Urban Storm Runoff and the Enhancement of Ground Water Recharge in the Tucson Area, Pima County, Arizona (Phase I Draft) Authors Water Resources Research Center Publisher Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Download date 09/10/2021 23:23:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/314310 Phase I Draft FEASIBILITY OF DIVERTING AND DETAINING FLOOD WATER AND URBAN STORM RUNOFF, AND THE ENHANCEMENT OF NATURAL RECHARGE. Water Resources Research Center College of Earth Sciences University of Arizona FEASIBILITY OF DIVERTING AND DETAINING FLOOD AND URBAN STORM RUNOFF AND THE ENHANCEMENT OF GROUND WATER RECHARGE IN THE TUCSON AREA PIMA COUNTY ARIZONA DRAFT THE WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH CENTER COLLEGE OF EARTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA TUCSON, ARIZONA 85721 MAY 1980 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Prepared for United States Army Corps of Engineers Los Angeles District Tucson Urban Study Regional Flood Control Element by The University of Arizona College of Earth Sciences Water Resources Research Center in cooperation with College of Agriculture Investigators: Professor Sol D. Resnick, Director, WRRC Dr. K. James DeCook, Hydrologist, WRRC Dr. L. G. Wilson, Hydrologist, WRRC in cooperation with: Mr. J. E. Posedly, Department of Soils, Water and Engineering, College of Agriculture Project Coordinator: Jonathon C. Goldman Contributors: Editors: John E. Stufflebean K. James DeCook Dale A. Altshul Sol D. Resnick John B. Price Jonathon C. Goldman Jonathon C. Goldman Sol D. Resnick Staff: Graphics: L. Donald R. Brokaw J. Newhouse A. Troutner S. Schuster N. Svacha i ABSTRACT ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PHASE I FEASIBILITY OF DIVERTING AND DETAINING FLOOD WATER AND URBAN STORM RUNOFF, AND THE ENHANCEMENT OF NATURAL RECHARGE Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT CONTENTS iii LIST OF TABLES vi LIST OF FIGURES viii INTRODUCTION 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT 1 LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA 2 DIVERSION AND DETENTION 4 PRECIPITATION 5 RAINFALL - RUNOFF RELATIONSHIPS 38 RUNOFF 77 METHODS OF DIVERSION AND DETENTION 113 CHANNEL HYDRAULICS 115 CHANNEL MODIFICATIONS 116 Historic 116 Present and Planned 117 EVAPORATION AND TRANSPIRATION 124 QUALITY (DIVERSION AND DETENTION) 127 QUALITY (GROUND WATER RECHARGE) 137 RECHARGE ENHANCEMENT 141 INTRODUCTION 141 METHODS 142 Spreading - Basins /Pits 142 iii Page Factors that Affect Basins and Pits 143 Design and Operation of Basins and Pits 146 Examples of Basins and Pits 151 Wells /Shafts 153 Factors that Affect Wells and Shafts 158 Design and Operation of Wells and Shafts 164 Augmenting Streambed Infiltration 168 Factors that Affect Streambed Infiltration 168 Design and Operation of Streambed Infiltration Enhancement 170 TECHNICAL INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS /COLLECTION TECHNIQUES 170 Infiltration 170 Percolation 173 Storage 175 Recovery 177 DATA AVAILABLE 178 Infiltration 178 Recharge 187 Hydrogeologic Conditions 191 Subsidence 205 SOURCES AND USE 207 CENTRAL ARIZONA PROJECT 208 History 208 The Plan at Present 209 Quality of Delivered CAP Waters 214 Delivery Sites 214 Summary 215 BENEFICIAL USE 215 Legal Definition 215 Uses 220 Reduction of Flood Damage 220 Flood Damage Reduction by Diversion, Detention and Recharge of Storm Runoff 221 Municipal and Domestic Uses 223 iv Page Mining and Industrial Uses 232 Agriculture 239 Summary 247 Recreational Use 242 Summary 247 Other Benefits 248 Exchanges 248 LAND USE INVENTORY AND PROJECTIONS 250 NATURAL DRAINAGE SYSTEM LAND USE 251 LAND USE PROJECTIONS 253 REFERENCES CITED 254 BIBLIOGRAPHY 268 APPENDICES 275 APPENDIX A - 276 APPENDIX B 299 APPENDIX C 303 APPENDIX D 347 APPENDIX E 358 APPENDIX Z 389 APPENDIX K 400 APPENDIX X 403 APPENDIX Y 405 v TABLES Number Title Source LA Normals, Means & Extremes National Weather Service 2A Duration array - return periods Reich, 1978 3A Coefficients - Atterbury Fogel, 1969 4A Hydrologic effects - Urbanization Savini & Kammerer, 1961 5A Description, Curve numbers, Coefficients - Kao et al., 1973 Urban Watersheds 6A Mean rainfall - runoff Modified SCS Boyer & DeCook, 1975 7A Events - Tucson Area Arai et al., 1977 8A Storms and Runoff High school WS Diskin & Resnick, 1976 9A Storms and Runoff Arcadia WS Diskin & Resnick, 1976 10A Statistical parameters High school WS Diskin & Resnick, 1976 11A Statistical parameters Arcadia JJS 12A Relationships between Variables High School WS 13A Relationships between Variables Arcadia WS 14A Rainfall - Runoff data Tucson Arroyo WS Foerster, 1972 15A Rainfall - Runoff data Atterbury WS 16A Distrubution of annual Streamflow Condes de la Torre, 1970 17A Monthly flood peaks above base IV II II II 18A Variablility of peak discharge II II II II 19A Flood Volumes it II II 20A Historic peak flows U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1975 21A Peak flows - IR & SPF " 1973 22A Average Velocities of flow II 1975 & 1973 23A Rates of Rise and Duration n y n n 1975 & 1973 24A 5 Highest peak flows by year - High School Diskin & Resnick, 1976 WS 25A 5 Highest peak flows by year - Arcadia WS 26A Peak flows by frequency - High School and - Arcadia Watersheds 27A Urban Runoff Pima Ass'n. of Governments, 1977 28A Annual Runoff - Urban & Semi -Urban vi TABLES (cont.) Number Title Source 100 Range and Mean of Chemical Constituents Laney, 1972 110 Water and Suspended Sediment discharges Laney, 1972 RECHARGE ENHANCEMENT 1B Tucson Basin Inflow, outflow, Infiltration. Burkham, 1970 2B Tucson Basin Water Budget 3B Hydrogeologic Characteristics Fogg, 1978 10 CAP Water Allocation, Delivery Schedule - Bureau of Reclamation, 1979 and Priorities 20 Consumptive uses and demand Quality - (Summary) Quantity - v. 30 Treated Water Quality Standards & Goals Bóz`et,1974 40 Ground Water Quality - Upper Santa Cruz Pima Association of Governments, Groundwater Basin 1979 50 Industrial Water Consumptive Use Projections 1978 60 Industrial Water Quality Demands Federal Water Pollution Control Admin., 1968 70 Projected and Total Irrigation Consumption Pima Association of Governments, 1978 80 Herbicide Levels for Irrigation Waters Federal Water Pollution Control Admin., 1968 90 Effluent Quality Gudelines for Various Uses RGA Consulting Engineers, 1979 100 Summary of generalized Land use in Eastern City of Tucson et al., 1975 Pima County vii FIGURES Number Title Source Fig. 100 Location of Study Area WRRC I, lA Precip. and Temperature Summaries National Weather Service 2A Precipitation monthly (WRRC, 1979) 3A Total Precipitation 1976 Wood, NWS 4A Total Precipitation 1977 Wood, NWS 5A Total Precipitation 1978 Wood, NWS u 6A Total Precipitation 1979 Wood, NWS " 7A Precipitation vs. Altitude Condes de la Torre, 1970 8A Atterbury, Experimental Watershed Boyer & DeCook, 1975 9A Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (Renard & Kepple.) " 10A Isohyetal map Storm of Aug. 20, 1956, Woolhiser & Atterbury Schwalen, 1960 " 11A Frequency of magnitude of storm centers Woolhiser & Schwalen, 1960 12A Storm Center, Area -Depth Relations Woolhiser & Schwalen, 1960 " 13A Isohyetal map Storm of July 16, 1975 Boyer & DeCook Atterbury 1975 " 14A Depth of Rainfall - Recurrence Fogel & Duckstein, 1969 " 15A Occurrences - Depth Osborn et al., 1972 " 16A 2 yr. - 6 hr. Precipitation Zeller, 1977 " 17A 2 yr. - 24 hr. precipitation Zeller, 1977 viii FIGURES Number Title Source Figure 100 Location of Study Area WRRC " IA Precipitation & Temperature Summaries National Weather Service ft 2A Precipitation monthly (WRRC, 1979) 3A Total Precipitation, 1976 Wood, NWS 4A Total Precipitation 1977 Wood, NWS 5A Total Precipitation 1978 Wood, NWS 6A Total Precipitation, 1979 Wood, NWS If 7A Precipitation vs. Altitude Condes de la Torre, 1970 It 8A Atterbury Experimental Watershed Boyer & DeCook, 1975 " 9A Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed Renard & Kepple) l0A Isohyetal map; storm of 8/20/56, Atterbury Woolhiser & Schwalen, 1960 11A Frequency of magnitude of Storm Centers Woolhiser & Schwalen, 1960 " 12A Storm Center, Area -Depth Relations Woolhiser & Schwalen, 1960 " 13A Isohyetal map; storm of 7/16/75, Atterbury Boyer & DeCook, 1975 tt 14A Depth of Rainfall - Recurrence Fogel & Duckstein, 1969 it 15A Occurrences - Depth Osborn et al., 1972 it 16A 2 yr. - 6 hr. precipitation Zeller, 1977 17A 2 yr. - 24 hr. " 18A 5 yr. - 6 hr. it " If tt 19A 5 yr. - 24 hr. " 20A 10 yr. - 6 hr. " 21A 10 yr. - 24 hr. It 22A 25 yr. - 6 hr. t, 23A 25 yr. - 6 hr. t, If 24A 50 yr. - 6 hr. " 25A 50 yr. - 6 hr. If It 26A 100 yr. - 6 hr. " 27A 100 yr. - 24 hr. 28A Area - Depth Curves N WS, 1961 29A Point -Area Conversions; 30- minute Osborn, Lane & Meyers, 1979 30A Point -Area Conversions ;60 -minute 31A Point -Area Conversions; 2 -hr. " ix FIGURES - Cont'd Number Title Source Figure 32A Point -Area Conversion; 6 -hr. Osborn, Lane & Meyers, 1979 tt tt " 33A Fraction of Watershed Area 34A Intensity - Duration of Flow Reich, 1978 It 35A Peak discharge - Recurrence)Walnut Gulch Osborn & Laursen, 1973 It " 36A Peak discharge vs. Drainage Area It 37A Urban Hydrology - Experimental Watersheds Kao et al., 1973 38A Rainfall - Runoff small watersheds tt tt 39A Urbanization effect on curve number t tt 40A Volume - peak relationships tt tt 41A Model -max series; rainfall - runoff Fogel et al., 1974 42A Impervious area - depth of runoff 43A Hydrograph - High School Watershed Arai et al., 1977- It It " 44A Hydrograph - Railroad Watershed tt It " 45A Hydrograph - Arcadia Watershed It tt " 46A Hydrograph - T -3 Watershed 47A Tucson Arroyo - Arroyo Chico Watershed 48A Channel losses; Santa Cruz River Condes de la Torre, 1970 49A Distribution of daily flows Sabino
Load more

Recommended publications
  • USGS Open-File Report 2009-1269, Appendix 1
    Appendix 1. Summary of location, basin, and hydrological-regime characteristics for U.S. Geological Survey streamflow-gaging stations in Arizona and parts of adjacent states that were used to calibrate hydrological-regime models [Hydrologic provinces: 1, Plateau Uplands; 2, Central Highlands; 3, Basin and Range Lowlands; e, value not present in database and was estimated for the purpose of model development] Average percent of Latitude, Longitude, Site Complete Number of Percent of year with Hydrologic decimal decimal Hydrologic altitude, Drainage area, years of perennial years no flow, Identifier Name unit code degrees degrees province feet square miles record years perennial 1950-2005 09379050 LUKACHUKAI CREEK NEAR 14080204 36.47750 109.35010 1 5,750 160e 5 1 20% 2% LUKACHUKAI, AZ 09379180 LAGUNA CREEK AT DENNEHOTSO, 14080204 36.85389 109.84595 1 4,985 414.0 9 0 0% 39% AZ 09379200 CHINLE CREEK NEAR MEXICAN 14080204 36.94389 109.71067 1 4,720 3,650.0 41 0 0% 15% WATER, AZ 09382000 PARIA RIVER AT LEES FERRY, AZ 14070007 36.87221 111.59461 1 3,124 1,410.0 56 56 100% 0% 09383200 LEE VALLEY CR AB LEE VALLEY RES 15020001 33.94172 109.50204 1 9,440e 1.3 6 6 100% 0% NR GREER, AZ. 09383220 LEE VALLEY CREEK TRIBUTARY 15020001 33.93894 109.50204 1 9,440e 0.5 6 0 0% 49% NEAR GREER, ARIZ. 09383250 LEE VALLEY CR BL LEE VALLEY RES 15020001 33.94172 109.49787 1 9,400e 1.9 6 6 100% 0% NR GREER, AZ. 09383400 LITTLE COLORADO RIVER AT GREER, 15020001 34.01671 109.45731 1 8,283 29.1 22 22 100% 0% ARIZ.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Geomorphology .. and Hydrology of the Santa Cruz River
    Historical Geomorphology .. and Hydrology of the Santa Cruz River Michelle Lee Wood, P. Kyle House, and Philip A. Pearthree Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 99-13 July 1999 Text 98 p., 1 sheet, scale 1: 100,000 Investigations supported by the Arizona State Land Department as part of their efforts to gather technical information for a stream navigability assessment This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standards. EXTENDED ABSTRACT This report provides baseline information on the physical characteristics of the Santa Cruz River to be used by the Arizona Stream Navigability Commission in its determination of the potential navigability of the Santa Cruz River at the time of Statehood. The primary goals of this report are: (1) to give a descriptive overview of the geography, geology, climatology, vegetation and hydrology that define the character of the Santa Cruz River; and, (2) to describe how the character of the Santa Cruz River has changed since the time of Statehood with special focus on the streamflow conditions and geomorphic changes such as channel change and movement. This report is based on a review of the available literature and analyses of historical survey maps, aerial photographs, and U.S. Geological Survey streamgage records. The Santa Cruz River has its source at the southern base of the Canelo Hills in the Mexican Highlands portion of the Basin and Range province. The river flows south through the San Rafael Valley before crossing the international border into Mexico. It describes a loop of about 30 miles before it re-enters the United States six miles east of Nogales, and continues northward past Tucson to its confluence with the Gila River a few miles above the mouth of the Salt River.
    [Show full text]
  • Hohokam Reservoirs, Tucson Presidio
    ARCHAEOLOGY IN TUCSON Vol. 6, No. 4 Newsletter of the Center for Desert Archaeology October 1992 HOHOKAM RESERVOIRS AND THEIR ROLE IN AN ANCIENT DESERT ECONOMY By James M. Bayman Desert Archaeology, Inc. Papaguería—the vicinity of the Tohono O'odham Indian Reservation), Arizona's most famous archaeologist, Emil W. Haury, even referred to the people of these drier areas as the ''Desert Branch Hohokam." Until fairly recently, Hohokam populations in these nonriverine areas were perceived to be of secondary importance in greater Hohokam society, and the Phoenix Basin was long viewed as an economic center for prehistoric central and southern Arizona (much as it is today). A common explanation for the apparent contrast between the Phoenix Hohokam and "everybody else" was that canal irrigation systems required an advanced organizational system, in other words, "people in control," for their design, construction, and maintenance. Moreover, because large- scale canal irrigation was simply not feasible in Hohokam Figure 1. A modern "charco," or reservoir, in the settlements outside the greater Phoenix area, it was thought Baboquivari Valley, at the modern village of Ali Chukson on that the ''Desert Branch" Hohokam never developed and the Tohono O’odham Reservation. This charco may be quite flourished to the extent of their neighbors. similar to prehistoric reservoirs utilized by the Hohokam in the nonriverine areas of southern Arizona. Photo by Jonathan A tremendous amount of recent archaeological survey and B. Mabry. excavation, however, has produced evidence that the Hohokam "regional system" was more diverse than previously thought. In the vast deserts between Tucson and Phoenix studies by institutions like Arizona State University, The remarkable development and desert adaptation of the the Arizona State Museum (University of Arizona), and the prehistoric Hohokam has long impressed explorers, settlers, Museum of Northern Arizona have resulted in the discovery and later, archaeologists who came to live and work in arid of a number of extremely large Hohokam sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin
    Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin By H. P. Eisenhuth GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 579 Washington J 968 United States Department of the Interior STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary Geological Survey William T. Pecora, Director Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C. 20242 Index of Surface-Water Records to September 30, 1967 Part 9 .-Colorado River Basin By H. P. Eisenhuth INTRODUCTION This report lists the streamflow and reservoir stations in the Colorado River basin for which records have been or are to bepublishedinreportsoftheGeological Survey for periods through September 30, 1967. It supersedes Geobgical Survey Circular 509. Basic data on surface-water supply have been published in an annual series of water-supply papers consisting of several volumes, including one each for the States of Alaska and Hawaii. The area of the other 48 States is divided into 14 parts whose boundaries coincide with certain natural drainage lines. Prior to 1951, the records for the 48 States were published in 14 volumes, one for each of the parts. From 1951 to 1960, the records for the 48 States were pub~.ished annually in 18 volumes, there being 2 volumes each for Parts 1, 2, 3, and 6. The boundaries of the various parts are shown on the map in figure 1. Beginning in 1961, the annual series ofwater-supplypapers on surface-water supply was changed to a 5-year S<~ries. Records for the period 1961-65 will bepublishedin a series of water-supply papers using the same 14-part division for the 48 States, but most parts will be further subdivided into two or more volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • ADEQ Flow Regime Updates | May 2021
    ADEQ Flow Regime Updates | May 2021 Name WBID Watershed Flow Regime Assignment Colorado River AZ14070006-001 CG Perennial (P) Paria River AZ14070007-123 CG P Chinle Creek AZ14080204-002-I LC Intermittent (I) Laguna Creek AZ14080204-003-I LC I Chinle Wash AZ14080204-017 LC I Lukachukai Wash AZ14080204-024-I LC I Colorado River AZ15010001-001 CG P Colorado River AZ15010001-002 CG P Bright Angel Creek AZ15010001-019 CG P Colorado River AZ15010001-022 CG P Colorado River AZ15010002-001 CG P Diamond Creek AZ15010002-002-I CG P Colorado River AZ15010002-003 CG P Colorado River AZ15010002-009 CG P Garden Creek AZ15010002-841 CG P Kanab Creek AZ15010003-001 CG P Kanab Creek AZ15010003-013-I CG I Truxton Wash AZ15010007-002 CG I Virgin River AZ15010010-003 CG P Beaver Dam Wash AZ15010010-009 CG P Little Colorado River AZ15020001-011A LC P Nutrioso Creek AZ15020001-017 LC P Nutrioso Creek AZ15020001-017A LC I Lee Valley Creek AZ15020001-232A LC P Lee Valley Creek AZ15020001-232B LC I Little Colorado River AZ15020002-016 LC I Little Colorado River AZ15020002-024 LC P Carrizo Wash AZ15020003-001 LC I Silver Creek AZ15020005-001 LC I Show Low Creek AZ15020005-012 LC I Silver Creek AZ15020005-013 LC P Unnamed Trib to Walnut Creek AZ15020005-239 LC I Puerco River AZ15020007-005 LC I Jacks Canyon AZ15020008-004 LC I Clear Creek AZ15020008-006 LC P Clear Creek AZ15020008-007 LC I Chevelon Canyon AZ15020010-001 LC P Chevelon Canyon AZ15020010-003 LC I Oraibi Wash AZ15020012-003-I LC I Polacca Wash AZ15020013-001-I LC I Jadito Wash AZ15020014-005-I LC Ephemeral
    [Show full text]
  • Brawley Wash - Los Robles Wash Watershed - Arizona (Altar Wash - Brawley Wash Watershed) Released By
    NEMO Watershed-Based Plan Santa Cruz Watershed Item Type text; Report Authors Uhlman, Kristine; Guertin, D. Phillip; Levick, Lainie R.; Sprouse, Terry; Westfall, Erin; Holmgren, Cassie; Fisher, Ariel Download date 27/09/2021 06:23:08 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/188192 Brawley Wash - Los Robles Wash Watershed - Arizona (Altar Wash - Brawley Wash Watershed) Released by: Sharon Medgal David McKay Director State Conservationist University of Arizona U.S. Department of Agriculture Water Resources Research Center Natural Resources Conservation Service Principle Investigators: Dino DeSimone - Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Keith Larson - Natural Resources Conservation Service, Phoenix, Arizona Kristine Uhlman - Water Resources Research Center, University of Arizona D. Phil Guertin - School of Natural Resources, University of Arizona Cite as: USDA Natural Resource ConservationConservations Service, Serivce, Arizona Arizona and and University University of of Arizona Arisona Water Water Resources Resources Research Center. 2008. BrawleyLittle Colorado Wash - RiverLos Robles Headwaters, Wash Watershed, Arizona, Rapid (Altar Watershed Wash - Brawley Assessment. Wash Watershed), Arizona, Rapid Watershed Assessment. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD).
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of September 1970 in Arizona, Utah and Colorado
    WATER-RESOURCES REPORT NUMBER FORTY - FOUR ARIZONA STATE LAND DEPARTMENT ANDREW L. BETTWY. COMMISSIONER FLOODS OF SEPTE1VIBER 1970 IN ARIZONA, UTAH, AND COLORADO BY R. H. ROESKE PREPARED BY THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PHOENIX. ARIZONA UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR APRIL 1971 'Water Rights Adjudication Team Civil Division Attorney Generars Office: CONTENTS Page Introduction - - ----------------------------------------------- 1 Acknowledgments -------------------------------------------- 1 The storm ---------------------------- - - --------------------- 3 Descri¢ionof floods ----------------------------------------- 4 Southern Arizona----------------------------------------- 4 Centrru Arizona------------------------------------------ 4 Northeastern Arizona------------------------------------- 13 Southeastern Utah and southwestern Colorado --------------- 14 ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 1-5. Maps showing: 1. Area of report ----------------------------- 2 2. Rainfrul, September 4- 6, 1970, in southern and central Arizona -------------------------- 5 3. Rainfall, September 5- 6, 1970, in northeastern Arizona, southeastern Utah, and southwestern Colorado -------------------------------- 7 4. Location of sites where flood data were collected for floods of September 4-7, 1970, in Ariz ona ------------------------ - - - - - - - - - 9 5. Location of sites where flood data were collected for floods of September 5- 6, 12-14, 1970, in northeastern Arizona, southeastern Utah, and southwestern Colorado-------------------- 15 ITI IV TABLES Page TABLE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 1Tuiurrmtj of Arizrnta &Xtlitin DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE
    The Chemical Composition of Representative Arizona Waters Item Type text; Book Authors Smith, H. V.; Caster, A. B.; Fuller, W. H.; Breazale, E. L.; Draper, George Publisher College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) Download date 01/10/2021 06:34:32 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/212507 Bulletin 225 November 1949 1tuiurrMtj of Arizrnta &xtlitin DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF REPRESENTATIVE ARIZONA WATERS Agricultural Experiment Station University of Arizona, Tucson ORGANIZATION Board of Regents Dan E. Garvey (ex officio) Governor of Arizona Marion L. Brooks, B.S., M.A. (ex officio) State Superintendent of Public Instruction W. R. Ellsworth, President Term Expires Jan., 1951 Samuel H. Morris, A.B., J.D Term Expires Jan., 1951 Cleon T. Knapp, LL.B Term Expires Jan., 1953 John M. Scott Term Expires Jan., 1953 Walter R. Bimson, Treasurer Term Expires Jan., 1955 Lynn M. Laney, B.S., J.D., Secretary Term Expires Jan., 1955 John G. Babbitt, B.S Term Expires Jan., 1957 Michaèl B. Hodges Term Expires Jan., 1957 James Byron McCormick, S.J.D., LLD President of the University Robert L. Nugent, Ph.D Vice -President of the University Experiment Station Staff Paul S. Burgess, Ph.D Director Ralph S. Hawkins, Ph.D Vice- Director Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Soils William T. McGeorge, M.S Agricultural Chemist Theophil F. Buehrer, Ph.D Physical Chemist Howard V. Smith, M.S Associate Agricultural Chemist Wallace H. Fuller, Ph.D Associate Biochemist George E. Draper, M.S Assistant Agricultural Chemist
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Groups Or Locally Active Partners
    Watershed Groups or Locally Active Partners Category (Partnership, Watershed Groups or Locally Active Partners Primary Partners Watershed Contact Person Position Email/Phone Website Tribe, Forest, etc.) Altar Valley, Brawley Wash (w/in Santa Altar Valley Conservation Alliance Watershed partnership Cruz Watershed) Mary Miller Executive Director [email protected] http://www.altarvalleyconservation.org Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests/ Watershed Forest Nancy Walls A-S Natural Resources Staff Officer [email protected] Aravaipa Watershed Conservation Alliance Watershed partnership Lower San Pedro Sandy Warner President [email protected] http://www.aravaipawatershed.org Arizona Water Sentinels Sandy Bahr Water Sentinels program contact [email protected] https://www.sierraclub.org/arizona/water-sentinels Conservation Education and Science Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Organization Debbie Colodner Director [email protected] https://www.desertmuseum.org Black Canyon Trail Association/ Black Canyon Heritage Park Organization Bob Cothern [email protected] https://blackcanyonheritagepark.org Borderlands Restoration Partnership Local partnership [watershed] Kurt Vaughn Executive Director [email protected] https://www.borderlandsrestoration.org/ Cienega Watershed Partnership Watershed partnership Cienega (w/in Santa Cruz Watershed) Tom Meixner UA faculty (water) and CWP Chair [email protected] http://www.cienega.org/ Cienega Watershed Partnership Watershed partnership Cienega (w/in
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a – Data for Sample Sites, Avra Valley Sub-Basin, 1998-2001
    Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Avra Valley Sub-Basin of the Tucson Active Management Area A 1998-2001 Baseline Study By Douglas Towne Arizona Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Quality Division Surface Water Section, Monitoring Unit 1110 West Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85007-2935 Publication Number: OFR-14-06 Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Avra Valley Sub-Basin of the Tucson Active Management Area: A 1998-2001 Baseline Study By Douglas C. Towne Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Open File Report 14-06 ADEQ Water Quality Division Surface Water Section Monitoring Unit 1110 West Washington St. Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2935 Thanks: Field Assistance: Elizabeth Boettcher, Royce Flora, Maureen Freark, Joe Harmon, Angela Lucci, and Wang Yu. Special recognition is extended to the many well owners who were kind enough to give permission to collect groundwater data on their property. Report Cover: An irrigated field of corn is almost ready for harvest in the late spring near the Town of Marana. Most irrigated agriculture in the Avra Valley sub-basin is located in this area, which is becoming a bedroom community of Tucson. Saguaro National Monument West and the Tucson Mountains are in the distance. iii ADEQ Ambient Groundwater Quality Open-File Reports (OFR) and Factsheets (FS): Harquahala Basin OFR 14-04, 62 p. FS 14-09, 5 p. Tonto Creek Basin OFR 13-04, 50 p. FS 13-04, 4 p. Upper Hassayampa Basin OFR 13-03, 52 p. FS 13-11, 3 p. Aravaipa Canyon Basin OFR 13-01, 46 p. FS 13-04, 4 p. Butler Valley Basin OFR 12-06, 44 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Section VII Potential Linkage Zones SECTION VII POTENTIAL LINKAGE ZONES
    2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 41 Section VII Potential Linkage Zones SECTION VII POTENTIAL LINKAGE ZONES Linkage 1 Linkage 2 Beaver Dam Slope – Virgin Slope Beaver Dam – Virgin Mountains Mohave Desert Ecoregion Mohave Desert Ecoregion County: Mohave (Linkage 1: Identified Species continued) County: Mohave Kit Fox Vulpes macrotis ADOT Engineering District: Flagstaff and Kingman Mohave Desert Tortoise Gopherus agassizii ADOT Engineering District: Flagstaff ADOT Maintenance: Fredonia and Kingman Mountain Lion Felis concolor ADOT Maintenance: Fredonia ADOT Natural Resources Management Section: Flagstaff Mule Deer Odocoileus hemionus ADOT Natural Resources Management Section: Flagstaff Speckled Dace Rhinichthys osculus Spotted Bat Euderma maculatum AGFD: Region II AGFD: Region II Virgin Chub Gila seminuda Virgin Spinedace Lepidomeda mollispinis mollispinis BLM: Arizona Strip District Woundfin Plagopterus argentissimus BLM: Arizona Strip District Congressional District: 2 Threats: Congressional District: 2 Highway (I 15) Council of Government: Western Arizona Council of Governments Urbanization Council of Government: Western Arizona Council of Governments FHWA Engineering: A2 and A4 Hydrology: FHWA Engineering: A2 Big Bend Wash Legislative District: 3 Coon Creek Legislative District: 3 Virgin River Biotic Communities (Vegetation Types): Biotic Communities (Vegetation Types): Mohave Desertscrub 100% Mohave Desertscrub 100% Land Ownership: Land Ownership: Bureau of Land Management 59% Bureau of Land Management 93% Private 27% Private
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Flow, Sediment Transport and Water Quality Connections in the Lower Santa Cruz River, Arizona
    Surface Flow, Sediment Transport and Water Quality Connections in the Lower Santa Cruz River, Arizona Thomas Meixner, Associate Professor of Hydrology and Water Resources, University of Arizona Eylon Shamir, Research Hydrologist, Hydrologic Research Center, San Diego Jennifer Duan, Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering, University of Arizona Report Prepared for U.S. EPA Region IX October 2009 1 Executive Summary The nature of hydrologic connections and their impact on water quality conditions in rivers is of ecological, hydrologic and biogeochemical importance. In this report, the nature of hydrologic connections and water quality impacts between the Upper Santa Cruz River basin, the Lower Santa Cruz River, and the Gila River are investigated. First a discussion of the important processes active in arid and semi-arid rivers is provided, emphasizing the nature of sediment and particulate transport and the opportunity for the channel network to provide an ecosystem service in the way of contaminant and nutrient removal. Following this, an analysis is conducted of the historical nature of hydrologic connections within the Lower Santa Cruz River system. The result of this analysis shows that existing infrastructure and actions of decision-making organizations recognize that the Upper and Lower Santa Cruz rivers are hydrologically connected. Next the nature of this hydrologic connection between the USGS gages at Cortaro and Laveen is analyzed through specific events, hydrologic response, and statistically. This analysis shows that large flows at Cortaro take approximately two days to propagate through the Santa Cruz River channel to Laveen. The statistical analysis shows that large flows at Cortaro lead to the largest flows observed during the period of record at Laveen and that these hydrologic connections of import occur approximately on an annual to bi-annual basis.
    [Show full text]