DOCSLIB.ORG

Kootenai Lower Meander Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kootenai Lower Meander Project Kootenai Lower Meander Project Draft Environmental Assessment March 2017 DOE/EA‐2051 Table of Contents 1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ........................................................................................ 6 1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Need for Action ..................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Purposes ................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.4 Background ............................................................................................................................................ 7 1.5 Public Involvement ............................................................................................................................... 8 2 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................... 9 2.1 Proposed Action .................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 No Action Alternative ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.3 Comparison of Alternatives ............................................................................................................... 16 2.4 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................... 20 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES ................. 25 3.1 Soils and Geology ................................................................................................................................ 25 3.2 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................... 26 3.3 Water Resources .................................................................................................................................. 28 3.4 Fish and Fish Habitat .......................................................................................................................... 32 3.5 Recreation ............................................................................................................................................. 35 3.6 Cultural Resources .............................................................................................................................. 37 3.7 Visual Resources .................................................................................................................................. 39 3.8 Noise ..................................................................................................................................................... 39 3.9 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gasses ................................................................................................. 41 3.10 Public Health and Safety .................................................................................................................... 42 3.11 Transportation and Utilities ............................................................................................................... 43 3.12 Socioeconomics .................................................................................................................................... 44 3.13 Other Environmental Resources ....................................................................................................... 47 3.14 Cumulative Effects Analysis .............................................................................................................. 47 4 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTATION, REVIEW, AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS .. 51 4.1 National Environmental Policy Act .................................................................................................. 51 4.2 Wetlands, Floodplains, and Water Resources ................................................................................. 51 4.3 Fish and Wildlife ................................................................................................................................. 52 4.4 Land Use Plan Consistency ................................................................................................................ 54 4.5 Farmland Protection Policy Act ........................................................................................................ 54 4.6 Cultural and Historic Resources ....................................................................................................... 54 4.7 Air Quality ........................................................................................................................................... 55 4.8 Climate Change ................................................................................................................................... 55 4.9 Noise ..................................................................................................................................................... 56 4.10 Hazardous Materials ........................................................................................................................... 56 4.11 Executive Order on Environmental Justice ...................................................................................... 56 5 TRIBES, AGENCIES, AND PERSONS CONSULTED ........................................................... 57 5.1 Federal Agencies ................................................................................................................................. 57 Lower Meander Project 2 Draft Environmental Assessment 5.2 State Agencies ...................................................................................................................................... 57 5.3 Tribes ..................................................................................................................................................... 57 5.4 Local Governments ............................................................................................................................. 57 5.5 Other ..................................................................................................................................................... 57 6 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................. 58 7 WORKS CITED .............................................................................................................................. 59 Lower Meander Project Draft Environmental Assessment 3 List of Figures Figure 1 Lower Meander Project Location ............................................................................................................. 9 Figure 2 Lower Meander Project Area .................................................................................................................. 10 Figure 3 Kootenai Lower Meander construction actions, Phase 1 (upstream) ................................................ 11 Figure 4 Kootenai Lower Meander construction actions, Phase 2 (downstream) .......................................... 11 Figure 5 Examples of large bank structures in the Kootenai River ................................................................... 13 Figure 6 Pool excavation actions in the Kootenai River ..................................................................................... 14 Figure 7 Vegetated brush bank structures under construction at the 2015 Bonners Ferry Islands project ............................................................................................................................................... 14 Figure 8 Staging areas and temporary haul roads .............................................................................................. 15 Figure 9 Examples of temporary river access road construction ...................................................................... 16 Figure 10 Peak Flows in the Kootenai River ,1932‐2012 ..................................................................................... 28 Figure 11 Sediment plume during 2015 Island Construction ............................................................................ 30 Figure 12 Excerpt from FEMA FIRM Panel 16027 0575 B showing the regulatory floodplain in the Lower Meander Project area within Boundary County. ........................................................... 31 Figure 13 Main public access roads into the project area .................................................................................. 43 List of Tables Table 1. Lower Meander project features by construction phase ...................................................................... 10 Table 2. Design details for large bank structures ................................................................................................ 12 Table 3 Design details for excavated pools ........................................................................................................... 13 Table 4 Comparison of Alternatives by BPA purposes ...................................................................................... 16 Table 5 Comparison of Alternatives by Resource Impact1 ................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Res-Marcuson1993 Kootenai River
    This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. F o r additional c o p i e s of this report, write to: Bonneville Power Administration Public Information Office - ALP-22 P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208 Please include title, author, and DOE/BP number from back cover in the request. KOOTENAI RIVER WHITE STURGEON INVESTIGATIONS ANNUAL REPORT 1993 Prepared by: Patrick Marcuson Senior Fishery Research Biologist' Idaho Department of Fish and Game Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Division of Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97283-3621 Project Number 88-65 Contract Number DE-BI79-88BP96497 MAY 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT ............................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................... 2 STUDY SITE ............................................................. 2 OBJECTIVE .............................................................. 2 METHODS ................................................................ 4 Adult Sturgeon Sampling ...........................................4 White Sturgeon Egg and Larvae Sampling ............................ 4 RESULTS ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Full Report 2007 5.Pdf PDF 1.8 MB
    The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Directory of Columbia River Basin Tribes Council Document Number: 2007-05 Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Tribes and Tribal Confederations 5 The Burns Paiute Tribe 7 The Coeur d’Alene Tribe 9 The Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation 12 The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation 15 The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation 18 The Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon 21 The Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation 23 The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon 25 The Kalispel Tribe of Indians 28 The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho 31 The Nez Perce Tribe 34 The Shoshone Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservation 37 The Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation 40 The Spokane Tribe of Indians 42 III. Canadian First Nations 45 Canadian Columbia River Tribes (First Nations) 46 IV. Tribal Associations 51 Canadian Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fisheries Commission 52 Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 53 Upper Columbia United Tribes 55 Upper Snake River Tribes 56 The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory i ii The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory Introduction The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory 1 2 The Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Tribal Directory Introduction The Council assembled this directory to enhance our understanding and appreciation of the Columbia River Basin tribes, including the First Nations in the Canadian portion of the basin. The directory provides brief descriptions and histories of the tribes and tribal confedera- tions, contact information, and information about tribal fi sh and wildlife projects funded through the Council’s program.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch1 Overview
    RESERVATION OF RIGHTS A number of governments and agencies participated in the development of this Kootenai Subbasin Plan, Part I (Assessment Volume), Part II (Inventory Volume), and Part III (Management Plan Volume), its appendices, and electronically linked references and information (hereafter Plan). The primary purpose of the Plan is to help direct Northwest Power and Conservation Council funding of projects that respond to impacts from the development and operation of the Columbia River hydropower system. Nothing in this Plan, or the participation in its development, is intended to, and shall not be interpreted to, compromise, influence, or preclude any government or agency from carrying out any past, present, or future duty or responsibility which it bears or may bear under any authority. Nothing in this Plan or the participation in its development constitutes a waiver or release of any rights, including the right to election of other remedies, or is intended to compromise, influence, or preclude any government or agency from developing and prosecuting any damage claim for those natural resource impacts identified in the Plan which are not directly and exclusively resulting from, or related to, the development and operation of the Columbia River hydropower system. Nothing in this Plan or the participation in its development is intended to, and shall not be interpreted to, waive any rights of enforcement of regulatory, adjudicatory, or police powers against potentially responsible parties for compliance with applicable laws and regulations pertaining to natural resource damages throughout the Kootenai Subbasin whether or not specifically identified in this Plan. © 2004 Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (KTOI) and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (MFWP) Citation: Kootenai Tribe of Idaho and Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Distribution of Impacts to Channel Bed Mobility Due to Flow Regulation, Kootenai River, Usa
    SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION OF IMPACTS TO CHANNEL BED MOBILITY DUE TO FLOW REGULATION, KOOTENAI RIVER, USA Michael Burke1, Research Associate, University of Idaho ([email protected]); Klaus Jorde1, Professor, University of Idaho; John M. Buffington1,2, Research Geomorphologist, USDA Forest Service; Jeffrey H. Braatne3, Assistant Professor, University of Idaho; Rohan Benjankar1, Research Associate, University of Idaho. 1Center for Ecohydraulics Research, Boise, ID 2Rocky Mountain Research Station, Boise, ID 3College of Natural Resources, Moscow, ID Abstract The regulated hydrograph of the Kootenai River between Libby Dam and Kootenay Lake has altered the natural flow regime, resulting in a significant decrease in maximum flows (60% net reduction in median 1-day annual maximum, and 77%-84% net reductions in median monthly flows for the historic peak flow months of May and June, respectively). Other key hydrologic characteristics have also been affected, such as the timing of annual extremes, and the frequency and duration of flow pulses. Moreover, Libby Dam has impeded downstream delivery of sediment from the upper 23,300 km2 of a 50,000 km2 watershed. Since completion of the facility in 1974, observed impacts to downstream channel bed and bars in semi-confined and confined reaches of the Kootenai River have included coarsening of the active channel bed, homogenization of the channel bed, disappearance of relatively fine-grained beach bars, and invasion of bar surfaces by perennial vegetative species. These impacts have led to reduced aquatic habitat heterogeneity and reduced abundance of candidate recruitment sites for riparian tree species such as black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa) and native willows (Salix spp.). Limited quantitative documentation of the pre-regulation substrate composition exists.
    [Show full text]
  • MFWP 2010 Section 10 Report Kootenai River White Sturgeon
    Kootenai River White Sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus : 2009-2010 Investigations in Montana by Brian Stephens and Ryan Sylvester Montana, Fish, Wildlife and Parks Libby Area Office Section 10(a)(1)(A) Permit TE-210255-0 January 2011 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... 2 Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................................... 4 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 7 Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 8 Results and Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 12 Total Catch .................................................................................................................................. 12 White Sturgeon ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Country Community Safety Strategy
    Indian Country Community Safety Strategy U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Idaho February 2012 Wendy J. Olson United States Attorney, D. Idaho United States Attorney’s Office District of Idaho Indian Country Community Safety Strategy 2012 Update The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Idaho’s Community Safety Strategy, first issued in February 2011, is designed to improve public safety in Idaho’s tribal communities. Idaho’s U.S. Attorney’s Office has a long history of meaningful involvement in Indian Country1 prosecutions. Idaho’s U.S. Attorney’s Office also has a long history of tribal liaison work with each of Idaho’s five federally recognized tribes. Public safety in Indian Country requires collaboration between the U.S. Attorney’s Office, tribal law enforcement, tribal leaders and tribal communities. This 2012 update to the Indian Country Community Safety Strategy reaffirms the steps put into place a year ago, highlights successes, and identifies areas for U.S. Attorney’s Office improvement in its public safety work in Indian Country. This update is accompanied by the 2012 U.S. Attorney Report on Indian Country. Indian Country and Idaho The federal government’s relationship with the tribes of what became the State of Idaho began in the fall of 1805 with Lewis and Clark’s Corps of Discovery and the Shoshone and Nez Perce tribes. As is well known, these two tribes played crucial roles in the Corps’ success, with Shoshone guiding, interpreting and facilitating peaceful interaction with other tribes. When the early snows of high country came, the Nez Perce provided crucial food, canoes and directions.
    [Show full text]
  • Kootenai River White Sturgeon Recovery Implementation Plan and Schedule
    Kootenai River White Sturgeon Recovery Implementation Plan and Schedule 2005 - 2010 Technical Report 2004 - 2005 March 2007 DOE/BP-00019398-1 This Document should be cited as follows: Anders, Paul, Sue Ireland, Kootenai River White Sturgeon Recovery Team, "Kootenai River White Sturgeon Recovery Implementation Plan and Schedule; 2005 - 2010", 2004-2005 Technical Report, Project No. 200200200, 52 electronic pages, (BPA Report DOE/BP-00019398- 1) Bonneville Power Administration P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208 This report was funded by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), U.S. Department of Energy, as part of BPA's program to protect, mitigate, and enhance fish and wildlife affected by the development and operation of hydroelectric facilities on the Columbia River and its tributaries. The views in this report are the author's and do not necessarily represent the views of BPA. Kootenai River White Sturgeon Recovery Implementation Plan and Schedule (2005-2010) Preparation of this Implementation Plan was administered by the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho through a contract from the Bonneville Power Administration (Project 198806400, Contract No. 00020490) as part of the Northwest Power and Conservation Council’s Fish and Wildlife Program., with assistance from the Kootenai River White Sturgeon Recovery Team. Document Citation Kootenai Tribe of Idaho (KTOI) 2005. Anders, P., R. Beamesderfer, M, Neufeld, and S. Ireland (eds). Kootenai River White Sturgeon Recovery Implementation Plan and Schedule (2005-2010). Prepared by S. P. Cramer and Associates for the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho, with assistance from the Kootenai River White Sturgeon Recovery Team (50 pp). About this Recovery Implementation Plan and Schedule This Plan and Schedule delineate research, monitoring and evaluation actions believed necessary to protect, rehabilitate, and maintain Kootenai River white sturgeon in conjunction with activities highlighted in the population’s Recovery Plan (USFWS 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • HERITAGE FISH CONSUMPTION RATES of the KOOTENAI TRIBE of IDAHO December 16, 2016
    HERITAGE FISH CONSUMPTION RATES OF THE KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO December 16, 2016 Prepared for the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho United States Environmental Protection Agency Prepared by RIDOLFI Inc. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through SRA International, Inc. Contract EP- W-14-020 HERITAGE FISH CONSUMPTION RATES OF THE KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO Prepared for the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho Prepared by RIDOLFI Inc. December 16, 2016 Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through SRA International, Inc. Contract EP- W-14-020. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................ iii LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS................................................... iv LIST OF UNITS ................................................................................................... iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..............................................................................1 1.1 Purpose and Objectives ............................................................................ 1 1.2 Study Approach ........................................................................................ 2 2.0 BACKGROUND ................................................................................3 2.1 Summary of Historical Fish Harvest and Consumption .............................. 3 2.2 Summary of Causes of Decline in Fish Populations .................................. 4 2.3 Hopes for the Future ................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kootenai River White Sturgeon Spawning and Recruitment Evaluation
    KOOTENAI RIVER WHITE STURGEON INVESTIGATIONS ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT CHAPTER 1: KOOTENAI RIVER WHITE STURGEON SPAWNING AND RECRUITMENT EVALUATION Period Covered: January 1, 1995 to December 3 1,1995 Prepared by: Vaughn L. Paragamian, Senior Fishery Research Biologist Gretchen Kruse, Senior Fishery Technician Virginia Wakkinen, Fishery Technician Idaho Department of Fish and Game CHAPTER 2: ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE OF LARVAL AND ADVANCED YOUNG-OF-THE-YEAR STURGEON AND BURBOT IN THE KOOTENAI RIVER AND KOOTENAY LAKE Period Covered: April, 1995 to October, 1995 Prepared by: Jim Fredericks, Fishery Research Biologist Idaho Department of Fish and Game and Les Fleck, Fishery Technician British Columbia Ministry of Environment Prepared for: U. S. Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration Environment, Fish and Wildlife P.O. Box 3621 Portland, OR 97208-362 1 IDFG 96-8 Project Number 88-65 Contract Number DE-BI79-88BP93497 December 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER 1: Kootenai River White Sturgeon Spawning and Recruitment Evaluation ABSTRACT . 1 Introduction .................................................... 3 STUDY SITE ......................................................................... 3 OBJECTIVE . 5 METHODS . 5 Discharge and Water Temperature............................ Adult White Sturgeon Sampling.............................. White Sturgeon Telemetry ................................. White Sturgeon Egg Sampling............................... Juvenile White Sturgeon Sampling............................ Juvenile White Sturgeon
    [Show full text]
  • Tribal History Published on Supreme Court (
    Tribal History Published on Supreme Court (https://isc.idaho.gov) Tribal History Tribal History Organized under the auspices of the Idaho Supreme Court Coeur d'Alene Tribe The aboriginal territory of the Coeur d’Alene Tribe encompassed approximately four million acres over an area that extended into Washington and Montana and which was centered around Coeur d’Alene Lake. The aboriginal tribal economy was based upon hunting, fishing, and gathering. Dissatisfaction with treaties being negotiated for Tribal lands led to battles with federal troops in 1858. The Coeur d’Alene Reservation was established by Executive Order dated November 8, 1873. Kootenai Tribe of Idaho The Kootenai Tribe of Idaho was once part of a larger Kootenai Tribe situated in what is now Montana and Canada. Although the "Kootenay" tribe was party to the Treaty of Hellgate in Montana on July 16, 1855, the Idaho Kootenai were apparently not represented, although the treaty ceded lands of the Idaho Kootenai. Thereafter tribal members received a few allotments but there was no reservation established for the Kootenai Tribe of Idaho. It was not until October 18, 1974, that lands were set aside in trust for the Kootenai Tribe by the United States. Act of October 18, 1974, Pub. L. No. 93-458, 88 Stat. 1383. Nez Perce Tribe The Nez Perce Tribe aboriginally had the exclusive use and occupancy of 13,000,000 acres, including all of what are now north central Idaho, southeastern Washington, and northeastern Oregon. The tribe had a strong economy based upon horses and hunting, fishing, and gathering activities that extended far from traditional areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to Congress on the Social and Economic Conditions of Native Americans
    Report to Congress on the Social and Economic Conditions of Native Americans U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Fiscal Years 2007 and 2008 This U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Report to Congress is in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 2992-1, to report on the social and economic conditions of American Indians, Alaska Natives, Native Hawaiians, American Samoan Natives and other Native American Pacific Islanders. Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Health and Human Services ............................................................................................................ 3 Intradepartmental Council on Native American Affairs ................................................................. 5 Administration on Aging ................................................................................................................ 7 Administration for Children and Families .................................................................................... 36 Administration on Children, Youth and Families ..................................................................... 37 Children’s Bureau ................................................................................................................. 37 Family and Youth Services Bureau (FYSB) ......................................................................... 49 Administration for Native Americans (ANA) .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kootenai River White Sturgeon: Synthesis of Two Decades of Research
    Vol. 17: 157–167, 2012 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published online May 23 doi: 10.3354/esr00407 Endang Species Res Contribution to the Theme Section ‘Endangered river fish: threats and conservation options’ OPENPEN ACCESSCCESS Kootenai River white sturgeon: synthesis of two decades of research V. L. Paragamian* Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83815, USA ABSTRACT: Little information is available on the Kootenai River white sturgeon Acipenser trans- montanus population prior to the completion of Libby Dam (Montana, USA) in 1972. Regulation of the Kootenai River by the dam significantly lowered discharge and reduced river temperatures during the white sturgeon spawning season. The population became recruitment limited and was listed as endangered under the US Endangered Species Act in 1994. An international recovery team between the USA and Canada was formed to develop a recovery plan and recommend recovery measures. This paper is a synthesis of research that followed. Population studies esti- mated an abundance of 1000 adults declining at about 4% annually. Through conservation cul- ture hatchery stockings in the early 1990s, survival was found to be about 65% in the first year and 90% thereafter; consequently, hatchery fish soon dominated the population. Wild white sturgeon spawning occurred in spring when the river warmed to ≥8°C but took place over sand substrates which were thought to be unsuitable for incubation and rearing. Recruitment failures continued to drive the decline despite augmented discharge, which was of little value to white sturgeon spawn- ing. Evaluation of spawning habitat and fluvial processes confirmed that cobbles and gravels were present at most spawning locations but were buried under sediment.
    [Show full text]