Cycle Parking Implementation Plan Making Sure Every Cycle Trip Starts and Ends with a Place to Park
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Rotherhithe Cycleway Consultation • Southwark.Gov.Uk • Page 01 Rotherhithe Cycleway Consultation
APPENDIX B Rotherhithe Cycleway consultation • southwark.gov.uk • Page 01 Rotherhithe Cycleway consultation Summary Report November 2019 Rotherhithe Cycleway consultation • southwark.gov.uk • Page 02 How we consulted What was consulted? This report summarises the consultation feedback for the The distribution area was large enough to gain views Rotherhithe Cycleway which links Cycleway 4 and from the wider community that may be considered to be Quietway 14 as a first phase and we are exploring affected by the proposed measures. A copy of the potential connections towards Peckham. The proposals postcards is appended. are located in Rotherhithe and Surrey Docks Wards. Consultees were invited to attend drop in sessions as Future cycling demand is predicting there will be a listed below and advised to respond to the consultation significant desire to\from Peckham and beyond, with up via the online consultation portal. They were also given to 150 cyclists using this section of the route during the an email address and telephone number by which to peak period, in the event of a free ferry crossing being respond: developed. a. 23 Jul 2019 at 17:30 to 20:00 at Canada Water The proposals include: Library b. 8 Aug 2019 at 18:00 to 20:00 at Osprey Estate a. Existing roundabouts at Redriff Road junctions TRA Hall with Surrey Quays Road and Quebec Way c. 30 Aug 2019 at 12:00 to 18:00 at Canada Water replaced with traffic signals with pedestrian Library crossings on each arm of the junction d. 7 Sep 2019 at 12:00 to 18:00 at Bacon's College b. -
Niche Innovation Dynamics and the Urban Mobility Transition the Case of Dockless Bike-Sharing in London
Niche innovation dynamics and the urban mobility transition The case of dockless bike-sharing in London Russell Cannon Urban Studies Master’s Programme (Two-Year) 30 Credits VT2019 Supervisor: Désirée Nilsson 1 Abstract This thesis seeks to provide a detailed understanding of the introduction of dockless bike-sharing to London. As part of a wave of new smart and shared mobility services that are aiming to transform the way people move around cities, this emerging form of transport has created disruptions in London since its launch in 2017. This study aims analyse to what extent dockless bike-sharing aligns or conflicts with the aims and objectives of local authorities governing public space in London. In doing so, it also aims to reveal insights into transformations in contemporary mobility by exploring the dynamics of niche innovations within socio-technical transitions, thus contributing to knowledge in the field of transition studies. To do this, a qualitative case study methodology was employed using document analysis and interviews with four stakeholders integrally involved in the case study, representing both public authorities and a private sector dockless bike-sharing operator, Mobike. The findings demonstrate that dockless bike-sharing is well aligned with the city’s explicit objectives to reduce car dependency and encourage active travel. It has particular potential to make cycling more accessible by bringing bike-sharing to parts of the city that do not have access to the pre-existing, docked bike-sharing scheme, operated by the central transport authority, Transport for London. Despite this, dockless bike-sharing, as a niche innovation, has struggled to break into the existing urban mobility regime. -
Safety Effects of the London Cycle Superhighways on Cycle Collisions 2 3 Haojie Lia,C,*, Daniel J
1 Safety Effects of the London Cycle Superhighways on Cycle Collisions 2 3 Haojie Lia,c,*, Daniel J. Grahamb, Pan Liua,c 4 aSchool of Transportation, Southeast University, China 5 bCentre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London, UK 6 cJiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies 7 8 *Corresponding author: Email address: [email protected] 9 ABSTRACT 10 This paper evaluates the effects of the London Cycle Superhighways (CS) on cycle collisions. 11 A total of 45 CS segments and 375 control segments are observed for a period of 8 years in 12 London. Variables such as road characteristics, crash history and socio-economic information 13 are included in the data set. Traffic characteristics including traffic volume, cycle volume and 14 traffic speed are obtained from Department for Transport. We first estimate the safety effects 15 on the CS routes using Empirical Bayes methods. Then propensity score matching methods 16 are also applied for comparison. The introduction of cycle superhighways caused cycling 17 traffic volumes to increase dramatically along CS routes with no significant impacts on 18 collision rates. Our models find that the increase in traffic was associated with a rise in annual 19 total cycle collisions of around 2.6 per km (38% in percentage). However, when we 20 re-estimate the effects based on cycle collision rates rather than levels, our results also show 21 that the CS routes are not more dangerous or safer than the control roads. Among the four CS 22 routes, CS3 performs the best in protecting cyclists with a large proportion of segregated 23 lanes whilst the cyclists have to share the lanes with motorists on other routes. -
Tfl's Quarterly Finance, Investment and Operational Performance Reports
Annexe D TfL’s quarterly finance, investment and operational performance reports Quarter 2, 2015/16 About Transport for London We are the integrated transport authority for London. Our purpose is to keep London working and growing and to make life in the Capital better. We reinvest all of our income to run and improve London’s transport services. Our operational responsibilities include London Underground, London Buses, Docklands Light Railway, London Overground, TfL Rail, London Trams, London River Services, London Dial-a-Ride, Victoria Coach Station, Santander Cycles and the Emirates Air Line. On the roads, we regulate taxis and the private hire trade, run the Congestion Charging scheme, manage the city’s 580km red route network, operate all of the Capital’s 6,200 traffic signals and work to ensure a safe environment for all road users. We are delivering one of the world’s largest programmes of transport capital investment, which is building Crossrail, modernising Tube services and stations, improving the road network and making the roads safer, especially for more vulnerable road users, such as pedestrians and cyclists. We are a pioneer in integrated ticketing and providing information to help people move around London. Oyster is the world’s most popular smartcard, and contactless payment is making travel ever more convenient. Real-time travel information is provided by us directly and through third parties who use the data TfL makes openly and freely available to power apps and other services. Improving and expanding transport in London is central to driving economic growth, jobs and housing across the country. -
Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Bike-Sharing Demand and Hire Time: Evidence from Santander Cycles in London
Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bike-sharing demand and hire time: Evidence from Santander Cycles in London Shahram Heydari1*, Garyfallos Konstantinoudis2, Abdul Wahid Behsoodi1 1 Transportation Research Group, Department of Civil, Maritime and Environmental Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK 2 MRC Centre for Environment and Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic has been influencing travel behaviour in many urban areas around the world since the beginning of 2020. As a consequence, bike-sharing schemes have been affected ― partly due to the change in travel demand and behaviour as well as a shift from public transit. This study estimates the varying effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the London bike-sharing system (Santander Cycles) over the period March-December 2020. We employed a Bayesian second-order random walk time- series model to account for temporal correlation in the data. We compared the observed number of cycle hires and hire time with their respective counterfactuals (what would have been if the pandemic had not happened) to estimate the magnitude of the change caused by the pandemic. The results indicated that following a reduction in cycle hires in March and April 2020, the demand rebounded from May 2020, remaining in the expected range of what would have been if the pandemic had not occurred. This could indicate the resiliency of Santander Cycles. With respect to hire time, an important increase occurred in April, May, and June 2020, indicating that bikes were hired for longer trips, perhaps partly due to a shift from public transit. -
London's Cycling Infrastructure
Holding the Mayor to account and investigating issues that matter to Londoners Transport Committee London’s cycling infrastructure March 2018 Key findings • It is clear that good quality infrastructure makes cycling safer, and encourages more people to cycle. Getting more people cycling is good for people’s health, and makes more efficient use of London’s congested road network. It is a key part of the Mayor’s Transport Strategy. • The Mayor made a number of bold commitments on cycling infrastructure in his 2016 election manifesto. And he has promised an average of £169 million a year for cycling schemes over the next five years. Recently he has announced six new cycle routes, although without delivery plans. Some schemes planned under the previous administration are also being taken forward following delay. • The jury is still out on the Quietway programme of cycle routes. While journey volumes have increased on the QW1 route since it opened, at this stage there is insufficient data to judge the overall success of the programme. • So far, most cycling infrastructure has been built in inner London. But the greatest potential for cycling growth is for local journeys in outer London. • Overall, the performance of the boroughs in delivering cycling improvements has been patchy. The Mayor could raise the standard of new infrastructure across London by turning the London Cycling Design Standards into new formal planning guidance. • Inadequate cycle parking remains a problem and needs to be addressed alongside the installation of new routes. Cycle parking at train stations is particularly important.London Assembly Transport Committee I 1 Holding the Mayor to account and investigating issues that matter to Londoners Transport Committee London’s cycling infrastructure March 2018 Over the last decade, successive mayors and TfL have prioritised million daily journeys currently made by cars, motorcycles, taxis or getting more Londoners cycling. -
Business Plan 2019/20 to 2023/24 About Transport for London (Tfl)
Transport for London Business Plan 2019/20 to 2023/24 About Transport for London (TfL) Part of the Greater London Authority We are moving ahead with many of family led by Mayor of London Sadiq London’s most significant infrastructure Khan, we are the integrated transport projects, using transport to unlock growth. authority responsible for delivering the We are working with partners on major Mayor’s aims for transport. projects like Crossrail 2 and the Bakerloo Line Extension that will deliver the new We have a key role in shaping what homes and jobs London and the UK need. life is like in London, helping to realise We are in the final phases of completing the the Mayor’s vision for a ‘City for All Elizabeth line which, when open, will add 10 Londoners’. We are committed to per cent to central London’s rail capacity. creating a fairer, greener, healthier and more prosperous city. The Mayor’s Supporting the delivery of high-density, Transport Strategy sets a target for 80 mixed-use developments that are per cent of all journeys to be made on planned around active and sustainable foot, by cycle or using public transport travel will ensure that London’s growth is by 2041. To make this a reality, we good growth. We also use our own land prioritise health and the quality of to provide thousands of new affordable people’s experience in everything we do. homes and our own supply chain creates tens of thousands of jobs and We manage the city’s red route strategic apprenticeships across the country. -
Paying for Bike-Sharing Systems EXAMPLES and TRENDS from LATIN AMERICA Introduction
Paying for bike-sharing systems EXAMPLES AND TRENDS FROM LATIN AMERICA Introduction Bike-sharing systems (BSS) have played BOX 1 a key role in discussions around how to promote cycling in cities for more than Financing and funding (CFF, 2017) a decade. This role has further increased Financing: Related to how governments (or with the emergence of private dockless private companies) that own infrastructure find the money to meet the upfront costs of building said systems since 2015. There are now infrastructure. Examples: municipal revenues, bonds, thousands of BSS in operation in cities intergovernmental transfers, private sector. across the world, particularly in Europe, Funding: Related to how taxpayers, consumers or Asia, and North America. others ultimately pay for infrastructure, including paying back the finance from whichever source Creating a BSS, however, is not simply a matter of governments (or private owners) choose. replicating a model that has worked in another city. BSSs are one element of a city’s overall transport infrastructure, Examples: Taxes, municipal revenues, user fees like roads, buses, metros, bike lanes, sidewalks, etc. Their and sponsorship. implementation must be based around a city’s context, including: (a) the applicable laws and regulations with respect to planning and operation of a BSS; (b) its integration with public transport networks, particularly The financing and funding options for a BSS will be its ability to connect transport nodes with offices and dependent on the operational structure that the city residences; and (c) the potential of cycling as a mode of chooses. In all cases, the city will be involved in this transport in the city and any relevant sustainability or structure: the degree of involvement will depend on the development objectives (Moon-Miklaucic et al., 2018). -
Cycling PDF 623 KB
Sustainable Development Select Committee Title Cycling update Alex Crush, Transport Policy & Development Manager Contributors Item 5 Josh Learner, Walking and Cycling Programme Manager Class Part 1 (open) 4 December 2019 1. Summary 1.1. This Committee report provides an overview of the Council’s commitment to cycling highlighted in the Lewisham Corporate Strategy 2018-22 (see background documents) and the 2017 Lewisham Cycling Strategy (see background documents). The report seeks to update the committee on progress against the projects included within these documents. 1.2. These projects include developing a cycle network across the borough, creating safer and healthier streets and neighbourhoods, delivering secure cycle parking, facilitating a dockless bike hire scheme, working with schools to encourage modal shift towards cycling and delivering a comprehensive road safety education programme. 2. Purpose 2.1. This Committee report provides an update to the Committee on the commitments made to cycling within the 2018-22 corporate strategy and 2017 cycling strategy. 2.2. The report also provides an opportunity for the Committee to provide feedback and a discussion with council officers on the progress made to date. 3. Recommendations 3.1. It is recommended that the Committee: note the content of the report and associated Appendices Provide officers with any feedback on the following schemes: o Deptford Parks Liveable Neighbourhood o Cycleway 4 o A21 healthy Street o Cycle Parking o Contra Flow cycling o Broader cycle network o Dockless Bikes o 20mph compliance o Road Safety Education 4. Policy context 4.1. The Mayor of London’s Transport Strategy (2017) contains an aim that by 2041, 80% of all trips in London to be made on foot, by cycle or using public transport. -
Cycle Superhighways London, United Kingdom
Cycle Superhighways London, United Kingdom QUICK FACTS Project Type Bicycle lanes, segregated from motor vehicle traffic, called “cycle superhighways” Location London, United Kingdom Usage East–West Superhighway planned capacity of 3,000 cyclists/hour; North–South Superhighway planned capacity of 2,500 cyclists/hour Length East–West Superhighway will be 18 miles (29 km), from Barking to Acton; North–South Superhighway will be three miles (5 km), from King’s Cross to Elephant and Castle Year Constructed Construction began in the spring of 2015; scheduled to be completed in the summer of 2016 Project Cost £160 million (US$240 million) Funding Public transit fares, London Congestion Charge, government grants, borrowing, and income from advertising and property rental Organizational Lead Transport for London Maintenance and Upkeep Shared among Transport for London, the 32 London boroughs, and the city of London A rendering of the East–West Cycle Superhighway along a portion of Victoria Embankment in central London shows the planned separation of bicycles, vehicular traffic, and pedestrians. (Transport for London) 46 ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION AND REAL ESTATE: THE NEXT FRONTIER IN SPRING 2015, construction began on two cycle superhighways that will connect central London and outlying areas of the capital with bicycling routes that are largely physically segregated from motor vehicle traffic. Also known as “Crossrail for Bikes,” a name evoking the east–west commuter rail line that is being built underneath central London, the new cycle routes are meant to be used as alternatives to driving or taking public transportation. In addition to road safety benefits and an increase in the proportion of bicycle commuters, the £160 million (US$240 million) investment in the creation of the cycle superhighways is spurring new residential and commercial development along the routes. -
Santander Cycles Leisure Routes
Santander Cycles Leisure Routes S I LV E R T W O O W R N R E A S T I N D I A D O C K R O A D E E R L O W L E A C W H O A D R O S C Limehouse D O C K R S I N A DiscoverT the Isle I A of Dogs A S T I N D G Y U E CABLESTREET LIMEHOUSEBasin B SHADWELL , , LIMEH Y AY W A H E H I G H W , E , , T Westferry S W T Tower Hamlets P O P L A R H I G H S T R E E T East India I N N O D I A College E US D O C K A SP E L ) R OAD VER THAM L N E RI ES I N U N Museum K ( T of London Blackwall Ontario Docklands Poplar A S P E N WAY Tower S Crossrail I Pumphouse , West BLACKWALL L V Place E India Quay N R Educational Canary T O Museum , Cabot W Wharf Canada N R O A D Square D W R W Square T E A AY L E SA Canary O S Canary R T ROTHERHITHETUNNEL S F Wharf Wharf ’ E N Doubletree R North O Inter- R , , , T The O2 Docklands Y Heron Continental Greenwich S , M Nelson Dock R E Hotel A O Quays R R P A S , Bank Street Bacon’s D H Ravensbourne W A , College College L L Emirates CANARY WHARF Greenwich Peninsula Ecological South Quay Park M A R S H WA L L Pan Y M A Peninsula North W A Y WESTFERRY ROAD , L E N L ROTHERHITHE Greenwich A H , C Exchange D H N U E M Tower D S E S U R , T R E E SALTER ROAD LIMEHARBOUR Y R Q R U M O RIVER THAMES A , I L Y L A E S N D N R D I A , U Canada OA O M R Cubitt Town F W Water D R I F E D , Library A Surrey Quays R Y CUBITT B L Shopping Crossharbour A C Centre K W D TOWN , A MILLWALL A JOHN HARRISON WAY L Greenland O L Greenland R Dock Asda TU Y R 3 , N South Millwall Outer Dock R N E Holiday Inn F E Dock L Express Surrey S R O GROVE STREET EAST U Quays I T L O W E R R O A D Mudchute H V E P L O U G H WAY Park & Farm R E N Mudchute A B U P B U S H R D R HAWKSTONEROAD , NE P A R I D H T H E L O R E T , A A H L C O T O R H L H R Millwall Isle of Dogs A R A Park Police Station W E T K M , S C E A E C H L T N B R A U EVELYN STREET S W M N E D S George Green’s L T F E E Island School Y G , R R Key ’ RO Y St. -
Lower Road Two-Way Streets and Cycleway 4 Consultation Report
Lower Road Two-Way Streets and Cycleway 4 consultation Summary Report March 2020 Introduction This report has been produced to provide a summary on the consultation exercise for proposed Lower Road Two-Way Streets and Cycleway 4. The proposals are located , in Rotherhithe Ward. The proposals are summarised below: a. All roads are made two-way, except for Cope Street, Croft Street and a small section of Hawkstone Road b. Lower Road between Rotherhithe Old Road and Redriff Road becomes bus and cycle only to enable connections with Cycleway 4 and the Rotherhithe Cycleway c. The through route for traffic becomes Rotherhithe Old Road, Rotherhithe New Road, Bush Road and Bestwood Street d. A segregated two-way cycleway is provided along Lower Road, and forms part of the proposed Cycleway 4 route e. Straight ahead movement introduced from Plough Way into Rotherhithe New Road f. Five new pedestrian crossings g. Public realm improvements including new planting h. Three trees removed, with 13 new trees provided. i. Amendments to some bus routes These proposals are the result of two projects that have been amalgamated: • Lower Road two way working. • C4 forms part of the larger scheme, which will provide a continuous segregated cycle route between Tower Bridge and Greenwich through Bermondsey, Rotherhithe and Deptford. Additionally, this scheme will connect to the proposed Rotherhithe Cycleway. 2 Consultation Process The views of the local community for the Lower Road Two-Way Streets and C4 schemes were sought as part of the Rotherhithe Movement Plan (RMP) consultation exercise. The RMP also included the following projects: a.