Neotropical Biology and Conservation 7(2):140-143, may - august 2012 © 2012 by Unisinos - doi: 10.4013/nbc.2012.72.08 COMMENT Antpittas and worm-feeders: a match made by evolution? Evidence for a possible commensal foraging relationship between antpittas (Grallariidae) and mammals Grallariidae e mamíferos: evidências de uma possível relação de comensalismo Harold F. Greeney1 Commensal foraging relationships er, 1993), and primates (Boinski and
[email protected] between two groups of animals fre- Scott, 1988; Heymann, 1992; Stott, quently involve one following another 1947; Zang and Wang, 2000). Similar- and capitalizing on the prey flushed ly, the types of birds involved in such by the movement of the other (Al- bird-mammal feeding relationships cock, 1997; Weins, 1989). In broad cover a broad taxonomic spectrum, terms, three of the best documented and include Accipitridae (Robinson, associations involving vertebrates are 1994), Laridae (Harrison, 1979), Pro- birds and mammals following ants cellariidae (Obst and Hunt, 1990), (Elliot, 1950; Júnior and Zara, 2007; Ardaeidae (Rice, 1954), Trogonidae Martins, 2000; Rylands et al., 1989; (Stott and Selsor, 1961), Bucerotidae Willis and Oniki, 1978, 1992), birds (Chapin, 1939), Cuculidae (Siegel et following birds (Baker, 1980; Ben- al., 1989; Smith, 1971), and several nett and Smithson, 2001; Hino, 1998; families of Passeriformes (Di Gia- Robbins, 1981), and birds following como and Di Giacomo, 2006; Komar mammals (see below). Such rela- and Hanks, 2002; Levey, 1999; Stott, tionships between birds and mam- 1947). Unlike the well studied rela- mals have been reported from many tionships between birds and ants in regions of the globe (Wiens, 1989), the lowland Neotropics (Willis, 1969; and documented mammalian “beater” Willis and Oniki, 1978, 1992; Will- species include a wide array of taxo- son, 2004), little is known about the nomic groups including elephants commensal foraging associations of (Ruggiero and Eves, 1998), deer (Her- Andean birds.