Antpittas and Worm-Feeders: a Match Made by Evolution? Evidence for a Possible Commensal Foraging Relationship Between Antpittas (Grallariidae) and Mammals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antpittas and Worm-Feeders: a Match Made by Evolution? Evidence for a Possible Commensal Foraging Relationship Between Antpittas (Grallariidae) and Mammals Neotropical Biology and Conservation 7(2):140-143, may - august 2012 © 2012 by Unisinos - doi: 10.4013/nbc.2012.72.08 COMMENT Antpittas and worm-feeders: a match made by evolution? Evidence for a possible commensal foraging relationship between antpittas (Grallariidae) and mammals Grallariidae e mamíferos: evidências de uma possível relação de comensalismo Harold F. Greeney1 Commensal foraging relationships er, 1993), and primates (Boinski and [email protected] between two groups of animals fre- Scott, 1988; Heymann, 1992; Stott, quently involve one following another 1947; Zang and Wang, 2000). Similar- and capitalizing on the prey flushed ly, the types of birds involved in such by the movement of the other (Al- bird-mammal feeding relationships cock, 1997; Weins, 1989). In broad cover a broad taxonomic spectrum, terms, three of the best documented and include Accipitridae (Robinson, associations involving vertebrates are 1994), Laridae (Harrison, 1979), Pro- birds and mammals following ants cellariidae (Obst and Hunt, 1990), (Elliot, 1950; Júnior and Zara, 2007; Ardaeidae (Rice, 1954), Trogonidae Martins, 2000; Rylands et al., 1989; (Stott and Selsor, 1961), Bucerotidae Willis and Oniki, 1978, 1992), birds (Chapin, 1939), Cuculidae (Siegel et following birds (Baker, 1980; Ben- al., 1989; Smith, 1971), and several nett and Smithson, 2001; Hino, 1998; families of Passeriformes (Di Gia- Robbins, 1981), and birds following como and Di Giacomo, 2006; Komar mammals (see below). Such rela- and Hanks, 2002; Levey, 1999; Stott, tionships between birds and mam- 1947). Unlike the well studied rela- mals have been reported from many tionships between birds and ants in regions of the globe (Wiens, 1989), the lowland Neotropics (Willis, 1969; and documented mammalian “beater” Willis and Oniki, 1978, 1992; Will- species include a wide array of taxo- son, 2004), little is known about the nomic groups including elephants commensal foraging associations of (Ruggiero and Eves, 1998), deer (Her- Andean birds. Largely anecdotal ac- ring and Herring, 2007), coatis (Sick, counts of many species of passerines 1984), peccaries, wolves (Silveira et associated with highland army ants al., 1997), armadillos (Di Giacomo (Labidus spp., Ecitoninae), however, and Di Giacomo, 2006; Komar and are scattered throughout the litera- Hanks, 2002), manatees (Scott and ture (Dobbs and Martin, 1998; Hilty, Powell, 1982), whales (Harrison, 1974; Nieto-R. and Ramírez, 2006; 1979; Obst and Hunt, 1990), dolphins Rios et al., 2008; Vallely 2001), in- (Evans, 1982; Monteiro-Filho, 1992), cluding several species of antpittas domestic cattle (Burger and Goch- (Grallariidae) (Greeney and Gelis, 1 Yanayacu Biological Station & Center for Creative Studies. Km 5, Via Las Caucheras, Cosanga, Napo, Ecuador. field, 1982; Heatwole, 1965; Källand- 2005; Kofoed and Auer, 2004; Nieto- Antpittas and worm-feeders: a match made by evolution? R. and Ramírez, 2006). Here, I pres- al., 2008), comes as no surprise. What bamboo at Yanayacu in 2001. During ent observations of Andean antpittas, seems more surprising, however, is a brief pause, I noticed a single adult which suggest that they may, at least how readily they respond to the stim- perched several meters away on a on a facultative basis, partake in com- ulus of human presence, vocalization, low branch. Apart from an occasional mensal foraging associations with and movement at feeding stations. flicking of its wings, it appeared un- mammals. This putative association, Many other wild birds are commonly perturbed by my presence. After mov- in turn, may help explain the success brought in by feeding stations of vari- ing another 20 m, I paused again. of recently implemented antpitta feed- ous types. The common static feeders, Within moments an adult antpitta ap- ing stations which have reached wide- however, are not accompanied by ob- peared and observed me as before. spread use in the tourist industry. vious (to birds) presence of humans. This continued for more than 30 min., My observations of antpitta behavior The following observations of behav- covering perhaps 100 m of dense bam- were made during the course of field ior exhibited by Andean antpittas sug- boo. I was not followed after emerg- work throughout Ecuador over the past gest a possible explanation. ing from the bamboo. In subsequent 12 years. I made most observations at Though allied with obligate follow- years I have had similar experiences Cabañas San Isidro and the adjacent ers of army ants (i.e., some species of with Chestnut-naped Antpitta (n = 1), Yanayacu Biological Station (00°36’S, Thamnophilidae; sensu Remsen et al., White-bellied Antpitta (n = 1), Rufous 77°53’W) in the northeastern Andes, 2011), antpittas are thought to only op- Antpitta (n = 2), Watkins’s Antitta (G. and at the Tapichalaca Biological Re- portunistically join mixed-species for- watkinsi; n = 4), Jocotoco Antpitta (n serve (04º30’S, 79º10’W) in Ecua- aging assemblages at ant swarms. Rel- = 6), and twice more with Chestnut- dor’s extreme southeastern Andes. I atively few species have been reported crowned Antpitta. To the best of my also include unpublished observations foraging at ant swarms (Greeney and knowledge, in all cases, I was not provided by several other field work- Gelis, 2005; Kofoed and Auer, 2004; near their nest at the time. Given the ers in Ecuador and Colombia. Nieto-R. and Ramírez, 2006). These natural ability of antpittas to remain Antpittas are among the most elusive records, along with my own observa- hidden, in concert with my own focus of neotropical passerines, and their tions and those kindly provided by on making a hole through the vegeta- scarcity and retiring manner make Eliot T. Miller, however, suggest that tion, it seems likely that I have been them a daunting challenge for the stu- most species of antpittas will opportu- followed through the undergrowth dent of birds. Predominantly, haunt- nistically follow montane ant swarms. more often than I am aware. Jose Ma- ing montane forests, antpittas occur Between Miller and myself we have ria Loaiza B. related a similar experi- through the Neotropics and reach recorded Chestnut-crowned Antpitta ence whereby he has been followed by their peak diversity in the Andes of (n = 2), White-bellied Antpitta (n = 2), Scaled Antpitta (G. guatimalensis) and South America. Antpittas forage pre- Chestnut-naped Antpitta (n = 5), and Ochre-breasted Antpitta. He observed dominantly on (Grallaria, Hylopezus, Jocotoco Antpitta (n = 4) in attendance both species coming to forage at leaf Myrmothera), or near (Grallaricula), at army ant swarms. I have also ob- litter he had disturbed, following him the ground (Krabbe and Schulenberg, served several species of Grallaricula for some distance to repeatedly cap- 2003). In recent years, due to the prize antpittas associating with ants, includ- ture prey from the areas of overturned that a sighting of these birds represents ing Slate-crowned Antpitta (G. nana; n soil and leaves. Though this is the in the tourist industry, the practice of = 6) and Ochre-breasted Antpitta (G. only other report of such behavior in calling-in and feeding antpittas via flavirostris; n = 2). The frequency of antpittas that I am aware of, it seems the creation of “worm-feeders” has these observations, especially given likely that it may often go unnoticed become wide-spread in Ecuador and the difficulty with which antpittas are or unreported. In addition to my ob- Colombia (Woods et al., 2011). This observed in the wild, suggests that ant- servations above, I have had similar involves establishing a location where pittas may associate with ant swarms experiences of being followed by two worms are regularly provided to ant- more frequently than is reported in Grallaricula antpittas, Slate-crowned pittas and/or may be foraged for in the literature, and that the behavior is (n = 4) and Peruvian (G. peruviana; n enriched compost. At most localities wide-spread within the family. = 2). In addition to these observations where I have witnessed this phenom- Perhaps, surprisingly, other than in under natural conditions, during the enon, antpittas are called in through situations as described above, I have construction of trails near Yanayacu, I whistles, calls, or other coaxing and, had my best looks at antpittas while frequently witness Chestnut-crowned, with time, are frequently tame enough crashing through dense understory White-bellied, and Giant Antpittas to take food from human hands. That vegetation in search of their nests. spending long periods of time foraging these largely terrestrial birds frequent- I first noticed “following behavior” in in the recently disturbed earth, often ly forage on worms, often feeding a Chestnut-crowned Antpitta while I only a few meters from those working them to their nestlings (Greeney et was moving noisily through Chusquea on the trail. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 141 Harold F. Greeney Most species of antpittas occur sym- ing strategy. Their apparent scarcity at http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853982X00265 patrically with a range of large mam- feeding stations is likely a reflection of CHAPIN, J.P. 1939. The birds of the Belgian mals. Other than large cats, montane a difference in prey choice, and their Congo, part 2. New York, The American Mu- seum of Natural History, 632 p. (Bulletin of the mammalian predators (which might relatively reduced experience with American Museum of Natural History 75). pose a threat if followed) are gener- worms as food. DOBBS, R.C.; MARTIN, P.R. 1998. Migrant bird ally small (e.g., Mustellidae) and Commensal foraging relationships participation at an army ant swarm in montane would not likely be profitable “beat- involving birds as “follower” species Jalisco, Mexico. Wilson Bulletin, 110:293-295. are common and wide-spread geo- EISENBERG, J.E.; REDFORD, K.H.; REID, ers.” Large herbivores, however, are F.A. 1999. Mammals of the Neotropics, Volume diverse, and include agoutis, pacas, graphically and taxonomically (see 3. Chicago, Illinois, Chicago University Press, deer, tapirs, and bears (Eisenberg et al., introduction).
Recommended publications
  • Colombia Mega II 1St – 30Th November 2016 (30 Days) Trip Report
    Colombia Mega II 1st – 30th November 2016 (30 Days) Trip Report Black Manakin by Trevor Ellery Trip Report compiled by tour leader: Trevor Ellery Trip Report – RBL Colombia - Mega II 2016 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________ Top ten birds of the trip as voted for by the Participants: 1. Ocellated Tapaculo 6. Blue-and-yellow Macaw 2. Rainbow-bearded Thornbill 7. Red-ruffed Fruitcrow 3. Multicolored Tanager 8. Sungrebe 4. Fiery Topaz 9. Buffy Helmetcrest 5. Sword-billed Hummingbird 10. White-capped Dipper Tour Summary This was one again a fantastic trip across the length and breadth of the world’s birdiest nation. Highlights were many and included everything from the flashy Fiery Topazes and Guianan Cock-of- the-Rocks of the Mitu lowlands to the spectacular Rainbow-bearded Thornbills and Buffy Helmetcrests of the windswept highlands. In between, we visited just about every type of habitat that it is possible to bird in Colombia and shared many special moments: the diminutive Lanceolated Monklet that perched above us as we sheltered from the rain at the Piha Reserve, the showy Ochre-breasted Antpitta we stumbled across at an antswarm at Las Tangaras Reserve, the Ocellated Tapaculo (voted bird of the trip) that paraded in front of us at Rio Blanco, and the male Vermilion Cardinal, in all his crimson glory, that we enjoyed in the Guajira desert on the final morning of the trip. If you like seeing lots of birds, lots of specialities, lots of endemics and enjoy birding in some of the most stunning scenery on earth, then this trip is pretty unbeatable.
    [Show full text]
  • Some New Information on the Distribution of Venezuelan Birds
    Some new information on the distribution of Venezuelan birds Peter Boesman Como resultado de la observación de aves en el campo durante los ultimos 10 años, se presenta un resumen de nuevos datos de distribución de aves en Venezuela. Los datos están organizados por area (20 en total), la mayoria de las areas son poco conocidas. Las observaciones de mayor importancia se detallan en ‘appendix 1’. En Falcón, la Serranía de San Luis tiene muchas más especies tipicas de las alturas sub-tropicales de la Cordillera de la Costa que previamente conocido, las serranias en el noreste de Falcón, de alturas bajas, tienen una avifauna abundante de especies de selva tropical, y areas de agua dulce en esta misma parte de Falcón y el norte de Carabobo son un refugio para muchas especies acuaticas poco conocidas. Los Andes en Lara y Trujillo no han sido estudiados tan profundamente como en Mérida, y por consecuencia se han descubierto importantes extensiones en la distribución de varias especies. En Mérida, se documenta indicaciones de una ruta migratoria muy importante a través del Valle del Río Santo Domingo. Las alturas bajas del Parque Nacional Tamá en Táchira (en el valle de los ríos Frio y Negro) y las areas adjacentes en Apure merecen mayor investigación en vista de algunas observaciones sorprendentes. Igualmente, los descubrimientos en islas del Río Orinoco fueron inesperados. La selva del Río Caura en el norte de Bolívar alberga especies previamente conocidas solamente del estado de Amazonas, y la región del Río Grande en el noreste de Bolívar tiene una avifauna tipicamente Guyanesa.
    [Show full text]
  • Adobe PDF, Job 6
    Noms français des oiseaux du Monde par la Commission internationale des noms français des oiseaux (CINFO) composée de Pierre DEVILLERS, Henri OUELLET, Édouard BENITO-ESPINAL, Roseline BEUDELS, Roger CRUON, Normand DAVID, Christian ÉRARD, Michel GOSSELIN, Gilles SEUTIN Éd. MultiMondes Inc., Sainte-Foy, Québec & Éd. Chabaud, Bayonne, France, 1993, 1re éd. ISBN 2-87749035-1 & avec le concours de Stéphane POPINET pour les noms anglais, d'après Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World par C. G. SIBLEY & B. L. MONROE Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1990 ISBN 2-87749035-1 Source : http://perso.club-internet.fr/alfosse/cinfo.htm Nouvelle adresse : http://listoiseauxmonde.multimania.
    [Show full text]
  • Greeney & Sornoza.Fm
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 16: 137–140, 2005 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society THE NEST AND EGG OF THE SLATE-CROWNED ANTPITTA (GRALLARICULA NANA), WITH OBSERVATIONS ON INCUBATION BEHAVIOR IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR Harold F. Greeney1 & Francisco Sornoza2 1Yanayacu Biological Station and Center for Creative Studies c/o Foch 721 y Amazonas, Quito, Ecuador. E-mail: [email protected] 2Fundación de Conservación Jocotoco, Pasaje Eugenio Santillán N 34-248 y Maurián, Casilla 17-16-337, Quito Ecuador. El nido y huevo de la Gralarita coronipizarrosa (Grallaricula nana) y observaciones sobre su com- portamiento de incubación en el sur del Ecuador. Key words: Egg, nest, incubation, behavior, parasite removal, Andes, cloud forest, Slate-crowned Antpitta, Grallaricula nana. The Slate-crowned Antpitta (Grallaricula nana) old trail, which had worn down into a steep- occurs from northern Venezuela to northern sided gully, and was surrounded by dense Peru, where it is uncommon to locally fairly Chusquea bamboo. The nest was 2 m above common in the undergrowth of montane for- the ground and supported by a loose, hanging ests, usually associated with stands of cluster of vines and dead (leafless) vegetation. Chusquea bamboo (Ridgely & Tudor 1994). In Brief observations indicated incubation of a Ecuador, where only the nominate nana race single egg. The second nest was discovered is found, it ranges from elevations of 2000 to on 25 November 2003, at which time it con- 2900 m (Ridgely & Greenfield 2001). While tained a single egg. An adult was present on Schönwetter (1979) provides a description of the nest, and did not flush until the observer’s the egg, there is apparently little else pub- hand was 50 cm from the nest.
    [Show full text]
  • LIBRO ROJO De La Fauna Venezolana 4Ta Edición 2015 Jon Paul Rodríguez Ariany García-Rawlins Franklin Rojas-Suárez
    LIBRO ROJO DE LA fAUNA vENEZOLANA 4ta edición 2015 Jon Paul Rodríguez Ariany García-Rawlins Franklin Rojas-Suárez Selección de Especies ubicadas en el estado Lara 1 Ángel del sol de Mérida / EN Heliangelus spencei Javier Mesa 2 Créditos Editores Autores Jürg De Marmels Romina Acevedo Jon Paul Rodríguez Abraham Mijares-Urrutia Dorixa Monsalve Douglas Rodríguez-Olarte Kareen De Turris-Morales Salvador Boher-Bentti Ariany M. García-Rawlins Ada Sánchez-Mercado Adda G. Manzanilla Fuentes Edgard Yerena Kathryn Rodríguez-Clark Samuel Narciso Franklin Rojas-Suárez Ahyran Amaro Eliane García Lenín Oviedo Shaenandhoa García-Rangel Ainhoa L. Zubillaga Eliécer E. Gutiérrez Leonardo Sánchez-Criollo Sheila Márques Pauls Editores Asociados Aldo Cróquer Emiliana Isasi-Catalá Lucy Perera Sofía Marín Wikander Mamíferos Alfredo Arteaga Eneida Marín Luis Bermúdez-Villapol Tatiana Caldera Daniel Lew Alimar Molero-Lizarraga Enrique La Marca Manuel Ruiz-Garcí Tatiana León Javier Sánchez Alma R. Ulloa Ernesto O. Boede Marcela Portocarrero-Aya Tito Barros Aves Ana Carolina Peralta Ernesto Ron Marcial Quiroga-Carmona Vicente J. Vera Christopher Sharpe Ana Iranzo Estrella Villamizar Marco Antonio García Cruz Víctor Pacheco Marcos A. Campo Z. Víctor Romero Miguel Lentino Andrés E. Seijas Ezequiel Hidalgo Fátima I. Lameda-Camacaro Margenny Barrios William P. McCord Reptiles Andrés Eloy Bracho Andrés Orellana Fernando Rojas-Runjaic María Alejandra Esteves Wlodzimierz Jedrzejewski Andrés E. Seijas Ángel L. Viloria Fernando Trujillo María Alejandra Faría Romero Yelitza Rangel César Molina † Aniello Barbarino Francisco Bisbal María de los Á. Rondón-Médicci Hedelvy Guada Antonio J. González-Fernández Francisco Provenzano María Fernanda Puerto Carrillo Ilustradores Omar Hernández Antonio Machado-Allison Franger J.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Camera Technology for Monitoring Nests. Chapter
    CHAPTER FIFTEEN Development of Camera Technology for Monitoring Nests W. Andrew Cox, M. Shane Pruett, Thomas J. Benson, Scott J. Chiavacci, and Frank R. Thompson III Abstract. Photo and video technology has become time-lapse digital video recording systems we increasingly useful in the study of avian nesting designed, we monitored 184 nests of 15 differ- ecology. However, researchers interested in using ent species. We generally found these low-cost camera systems are often faced with insufficient systems (US$350–725 per unit) to be reliable. information on the types and relative advantages Sources of data loss were variable by study but of available technologies. We reviewed the litera- included digital recorder malfunction, power ture for studies of nests that used cameras and failure, and video cable damage due to rodents. summarized them based on study objective and Our review of the literature and our own experi- the type of technology used. We also designed and ences suggest that researchers carefully consider tested two video systems that we used for three their objectives and study systems when choos- nest predator and behavioral studies. We found ing camera technology. To facilitate selection of 327 studies that recorded 255 bird species span- the appropriate system, we describe general video ning 19 orders. Cameras were most commonly system design and offer recommendations for used to study nest predators (n ϭ 114), feeding researchers based on commercially available sys- ecology (n ϭ 103), and adult behavior (n ϭ 81). tem components. Most systems (69%) were partially or completely user-built. Systems that recorded in real time Key Words: behavior, camera, digital video (Ն25 frames per second), time-lapse (Ͻ25 fps), recorder, nest monitoring, parental care, photog- and still images were all common, though their raphy, predation, time-lapse, video.
    [Show full text]
  • VENEZUELA La Escalera and the Western Areas May 29 – June 11, 2005 by RON HOFF Clinton, Tennessee USA
    VENEZUELA La Escalera and the western areas May 29 – June 11, 2005 By RON HOFF Clinton, Tennessee USA My wife, Dollyann Myers, and I joined our friends Frank Bills and his wife Sharon Bostick for a 2 week trip to Venezuela. Frank had contracted with Venezuelan guide David Ascanio ([email protected]) to guide us for this trip. David is a well known native Venezuela guide and guides regularly for Victor Emanuel Nature Tours and other tour companies, as well as private groups. We all found David to be one of the best guides we have ever used, anywhere. His knowledge of Venezuelan birds, their calls, and their habitats is unbelievable. On top of that he is a great guy with a superb sense of humor. We had a fantastic time with him and highly recommend him to anyone going to Venezuela or nearby countries. He has his own web site at www.ascaniobirding.com. Our trip was oriented around trying to find as many endemics as we could, but not necessarily as many species as we could. This worked out fine for us and in the end I saw 413 species and heard another 36. This included 20 endemics. Clements’ list says there are 45 endemics in Venezuela, so this adds up to about 44% of Venezuela’s endemics. Adding in what others saw and heard but I didn’t, we finished up with nearly 500 species anyway. Pretty awesome for just 2 weeks! I’ll write up the daily accounts, highlighting most of the new species for the day (but not necessarily the common birds like Tropical Kingbird, etc.), and then I’ll give the overall species list at the end of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotropical Birding 25
    >> NEW BOOK ANTPITTAS THEN AND NOW Then and now: a look at the ‘antpitta revolution’ of the past 25 years Harold F. Greeney A stand-out article from Cotinga 2 was Niels Krabbe’s synopsis of the state of knowledge about Giant Antpitta Grallaria gigantea. Including details of recent field records in Ecuador, this really got the juices flowing about a then-mythical beast. How times have changed! Neotropical Birding invited the modern- day guru of all things grallarid – and author of the 2018 book Antpittas and gnateaters, reviewed on page 86 – to give his perspective on 25 years of antpitta-related revelations. 1 Giant Antpitta Grallaria gigantea, November 2016 (James Lowen/8 jameslowen.com), the subject of the Cotinga 2 paper by Niels Krabbe et al. 2 (1994). 42 Neotropical Birding 25 hen invited to write this article, the Ecuador, a farmer named Ángel Paz joined many stated premise was to illustrate how our other residents of the region in responding to W knowledge of antpittas has changed since the growing avitourism industry by charging the publication of Niels Krabbe et al.’s (1994) birdwatchers to visit the Andean Cock-of-the- article published in Cotinga 2 (Fig. 1), exactly a rock Rupicola quarter of a century ago, concerning the Giant peruviana lek 2 Antpitta Grallaria gigantean (Fig. 2). Although that was active I count myself among those of us most aware of on his property. these changes, I confess I was still shocked to (re) As he grew to read the first paragraph, wherein Krabbe and understand company reveal that, prior that date, the Giant the mentality Antpitta had gone virtually unrecorded for over 35 of birders and years! Indeed, recently summarised information on their (oft- this species (Collar et al.
    [Show full text]
  • First Breeding Record of Wilson's Plover (Charadrius Wilsonia) from the Pacific Coast of Colombia
    104 THE WILSON BULLETIN x Vol. 116, No. 1, March 2004 Wilson Bulletin, 116(1), 2004, pp. 104±105 First Breeding Record of Wilson's Plover (Charadrius wilsonia) from the Paci®c Coast of Colombia Alan Giraldo,1,4 Carlos HernaÂndez,2 Carolina GoÂmez,3 Fernando Castillo,2 and Jorge E. Saavedra2 ABSTRACT.ÐWilson's Plover (Charadrius wilson- for Colombia's Paci®c coast (Hilty and Brown ia) occurs year-round along the Caribbean and Paci®c 1986, Salaman et al. 2001). coasts of Colombia. The species frequents a variety of On 13 May 1993, we participated in a coastal habitats including sandy beaches, tidal ¯ats, and small swamps and wetlands. Its breeding range shorebird survey of Punta Soldado Island, extends from Virginia south through the West Indies Buenaventura Bay (038 499 550 N, 778 089 400 to Surinam, and from Baja California to Peru. Here, W), conducted by the Association for the we report the ®rst nesting record on the Paci®c coast Study and Conservation of Aquatic Birds in of Colombia. Received 14 June 2003, accepted 10 Colombia (CALIDRIS). Punta Soldado beach- March 2004. es are essentially unaffected by tides (possibly ¯ooded once per year), are sparsely vegetated, and serve as roosting and foraging sites for All three sub-species of Wilson's Plover numerous migratory shorebirds and terns (Charadrius wilsonia wilsonia, C. w. beldingi, (Aparicio et al. 1996, Naranjo and Mauna and C. w. cinnamoninus) have been recorded 1996). We observed two C. wilsonia adults in Colombia. The ®rst records (C. w. wilsonia (male and female) exhibiting defensive behav- and C.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing Bird Migrations Verônica Fernandes Gama
    Assessing Bird Migrations Verônica Fernandes Gama Master of Philosophy, Remote Sensing Bachelor of Biological Sciences (Honours) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 School of Biological Sciences Abstract Birds perform many types of migratory movements that vary remarkably both geographically and between taxa. Nevertheless, nomenclature and definitions of avian migrations are often not used consistently in the published literature, and the amount of information available varies widely between taxa. Although comprehensive global lists of migrants exist, these data oversimplify the breadth of types of avian movements, as species are classified into just a few broad classes of movements. A key knowledge gap exists in the literature concerning irregular, small-magnitude migrations, such as irruptive and nomadic, which have been little-studied compared with regular, long-distance, to-and- fro migrations. The inconsistency in the literature, oversimplification of migration categories in lists of migrants, and underestimation of the scope of avian migration types may hamper the use of available information on avian migrations in conservation decisions, extinction risk assessments and scientific research. In order to make sound conservation decisions, understanding species migratory movements is key, because migrants demand coordinated management strategies where protection must be achieved over a network of sites. In extinction risk assessments, the threatened status of migrants and non-migrants is assessed differently in the International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List, and the threatened status of migrants could be underestimated if information regarding their movements is inadequate. In scientific research, statistical techniques used to summarise relationships between species traits and other variables are data sensitive, and thus require accurate and precise data on species migratory movements to produce more reliable results.
    [Show full text]
  • Henri Pittier National Park
    Henri Pittier National Park Summary Description Threats Solutions Conclusions Photo Gallery Date of most recent on-site evaluation: December 2000 Date posted: September 2001 Location: Aragua and Carabobo States Year created: 1937 Area: 107,800 ha Ecoregion: Cordillera de la Costa Montane Forest, La Costa xeric shrublands Habitat: Dry semi-deciduous forest, deciduous forest, coastal shrub forest, savanna, evergreen rain forest, cloud forest, and mangroves. - Summary Description In 1937 Henri Pittier became Venezuela's first national park. It is named in recognition of the Swiss naturalist who promoted and founded Venezuela's National Park System. Henri Pittier covers 107,800 ha and is located in the central portion of the Cordillera de la Costa mountain range that extends east to west along the northern Caribbean coast. Along the park's altitudinal gradient are several distinct habitats, including mangroves, savannas, dry forests, humid forests, and cloud forests, which result in high levels of biodiversity. World-class birdwatching and the beautiful beaches of the Caribbean Sea make the park a popular destination for international and Venezuelan tourists. Several towns lie within the boundaries of the park. Some of these towns are small, traditional communities that depend on the sustainable cultivation of cacao (Theobroma cacao). Several resort towns also lie within the park along its borders. Biodiversity Henri Pittier National Park is internationally known for its high biodiversity, and the avifauna is of particular importance. About 43% of Venezuela's bird species, including six globally threatened bird species and the harpy eagle (nearly threatened), live within the park. In addition to resident species, there is a migration corridor (Paso de Portachuelo) that supports seasonal birds and butterflies from North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Classic Colombia
    The stunning Buffy Helmetcrest was one of the many great endemics we encountered on this fabulous tour! (Chris Venetz) CLASSIC COLOMBIA 22 FEBRUARY – 15 MARCH 2020 LEADER: CHRIS VENETZ and TREVOR ELLERY THe 2020 Birdquest Classic Colombia continued tHe run of previous successful tours, and was once again anotHer memorable birding adventure in tHis incredible bird-rich country. WitH nearly 1900 species, Colombia is simply Home to more species of birds tHan any otHer country in tHe world and firmly established as a premier birding destination in SoutH America. Beside tHe greatest list, Colombia also Holds an extraordinary set of endemics, as well as plenty of other range-restricted species shared witH neigHbour countries, and this definitely kept us busy every day tHrougHout tHis incredible tour! THe main reason beHind such a HigH rate of endemism is due to tHe effect tHat Here in Colombia the Andes split into tHree slopes, isolating two major valleys and tHeir associated endemics, while tHe nortHern part of tHe country also hold the famous Santa Marta Mountains, a completely isolated mountain range where another great number of endemics are found. The excellent birding infrastructures, some super friendly and excellent local guides, as well as the great 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: Classic Colombia 2020 www.birdquest-tours.com conservation movement simply added a very pleasant side during our daily quest for tHese special birds. We crossed a wide range of Habitats spanning from wetlands in tHe Carribean coast, to arid scrubs in tHe Guajira Peninsula, to rich Andean footHill forest (including tHe CHoco bioregion), to tHe spectacular paramo of the HigH Andes and also to the unique tropical forest of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta.
    [Show full text]