Enhancement of Rnai by a Small Molecule Antibiotic Enoxacin

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Enhancement of Rnai by a Small Molecule Antibiotic Enoxacin Qiangzhe Zhang et al. npg Cell Research (2008) 18:1077-1079. 1077 © 2008 IBCB, SIBS, CAS All rights reserved 1001-0602/08 $ 30.00 npg LETTER TO THE EDITOR www.nature.com/cr Enhancement of RNAi by a small molecule antibiotic enoxacin Qiangzhe Zhang 1, *, Caihong Zhang 1, *, Zhen Xi 1 1 State Key Laboratory of Elemento-Organic Chemistry and Department of Chemical Biology, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China Cell Research (2008) 18:1077-1079. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.287; published online 23 September 2008 Dear Editor, RNAi. We hypothesized that inhibitors of RNA helicases may increase the stability of double-stranded siRNA, so RNAi has become a mainstream molecular tool for as to enhance RNAi efficiency. Since a large family of assessing the functions of genes in mammalian cells [1]. fluoroquinolone antibiotics target bacterial DNA gyrase Large-scale RNA interference-based analyses are often complexed with the targeted DNA possibly in A-form complicated by false positive and negative hits due to (similar to RNA) [6] and since they also exhibit antiviral off-target effects [2] and interferon response [3], which activity through interference with Tat-TAR interaction can be attributed at least in part to the use of high con- [7], we decided to screen a library of commercially avail- centrations of siRNA. Lowering the amounts of siRNAs able fluoroquinolone antibiotics, with the hope that some and shRNAs can effectively and expediently mitigate the of the analogs may cross-inhibit relevant human RNA off-target effect and interferon response [4]. However, in helicases. Herein, we report that enoxacin, one of the RNAi experiments, lowering the concentration of siRNA fluoroquinolone antibiotics known to inhibit bacterial gy- is often accompanied by a lower knockdown efficiency. rase and topoisomerase IV with minimal effects on their One of the key factors affecting RNAi efficiency is the mammalian counterparts, can increase RNAi efficiency. stability of double-stranded siRNA. We reasoned that We have found that enoxacin can reduce the concentra- measures that could stabilize double-stranded RNA may tions of siRNA by 2~5-fold for the same RNAi knock- lead to increased RNAi efficiency. Given that RNAi down efficiency. requires a number of cellular proteins, it should be possi- A dual-luciferase reporter assay system was used to ble, at least in theory, to regulate the efficiency of RNAi screen small organic compounds that were capable of en- using small organic molecules. To stabilize ds-RNA used hancing RNAi efficiency. The siRNA used in our screen in RNAi, we therefore envisioned the following meth- is siFL867-885, which can effectively suppress the firefly ods: (1) to design more stable siRNA (screening for cer- luciferase reporter activity at 10 nM siRNA duplexes tain sequences, modification of RNA); (2) to increase the [8]. This system has been reported to be a robust siRNA activity of ds-RNA protective proteins (such as ds-RNA- screening system [8]. As a starting point, we diluted binding proteins, or simply binding domains); (3) to in- siFL867-885 to a concentration of 8.4×10–10 M, and at hibit the activity of ds-RNA-dissolving proteins (such as this concentration the RNAi knockdown was partial. RNA helicases); (4) to stabilize ds-RNA and/or its pro- A small library of fifteen widely used fluoroquinolone tein complex with small organic compounds. Our long- antibiotics (Figure 1B) was screened using the dual-lu- standing interest in drug-nucleic acids interaction [5] led ciferase reporter system. By statistical analysis of experi- us to search for potential small molecular regulators of mental data (Figure 1A), seven compounds were found to increase RNAi efficiency (Figure 1B, the compounds shown with asterisk (*)). Among these 7 fluoroquino- lones exhibiting statistically significant RNAi-enhancing *These two authors contributed equally to this work. activities, enoxacin and norfloxacin were more active Correspondence: Zhen Xi Tel/Fax: +86-22-23504782 than others at the same concentration. We then chose E-mail: [email protected] enoxacin and norfloxacin for further characterization. It www.cell-research.com | Cell Research npg Enhancement of RNAi by a small molecule antibiotic enoxacin 1078 1200000 A control compound siRNA siRNA+compoud 1000000 800000 600000 120000 100000 Firefly luciferase activity 80000 60000 40000 20000 0 Compound Enoxacin Fleroxacin Ofloxacin DifloxacinPefloxacin NorfloxacinGatifloxacin Balofloxacin Pazufloxacin Levofloxacin PrulifloxacinSparfloxacinNadifloxacinCiprofloxacinLomefloxacin B C 100 Balofloxacin Fleroxacin Pazufloxacin Ofloxacin Levofloxacin enoxacin + enoxacin – 16.7 nM 95 Norfloxacin Gatifloxacin Enoxacin Prulifloxacin Sparfloxacin 1.67 nM 90 0.84 nM 85 0.42 nM Nadifloxacin Ciprfloxacin Lomefloxacin Difloxacin Pefloxacin RNAi knockdown percentage 80 0.21 nM 1×10–10 1×10–9 1×10–8 siRNA concentration (M) Figure 1 (A) Screening of 15 fluoroquinolones for RNAi enhancing activity in cultured HEK-293 cells. Statistically significant difference of RNAi efficiency was observed in the presence of 7 compounds as shown with asterisk. The Y-axis denotes the chemiluminescence data of firefly luciferase activities. The final concentrations of siRNA duplexes (siFL867-885) and com- pounds are 8.4×10–10 M and 50 mM, respectively. The plotted data represent the mean±SE. The asterisk (*) denotes statisti- cally significant difference (P < 0.05). (B) Chemical structures of 15 fluoroquinolones. The compounds showing statistically significant RNAi enhancing effect are labeled with asterisk (P < 0.05). (C) RNAi efficiency of different concentrations of siRNA (siFL867-885) in the presence or absence of enoxacin. At 12 h post-transfection, HEK-293 cells were treated without or with enoxacin at the final concentration of 50 mM. The Y-axis denotes the RNAi knockdown percentage of firefly luciferase activity after correction by renilla luciferase activity (using normalized expression ratios between the firefly luciferase avtivity and the renilla luciferase activity in the dual-luciferase reporter assay system) [6]. The RNAi-enhancing activity by enoxacin reaches the maximum at the siRNA concentration of 8.4×10–10 M. All experiments with siRNAs were performed in triplicates and re- peated at least twice. Each value represents the mean±SE. was found that the RNAi-enhancing activity of enoxacin to cause non-specific reduction of the firefly luciferase was dose-dependent (see Supplementary information, activity (see Supplementary information, Figure S3). The Figure S1). The EC50 of enoxacin as an RNAi enhancer RNAi efficiency of different concentrations of siRNA is about 30 mM. This concentration is far below the IC50 (siFL867-885) in the presence or absence of enoxacin of enoxacin for inhibition of topoisomerase II in human was also examined. At 12 h post-transfection, HEK-293 macrophages (IC50 = 1 485 mM) (see Supplementary in- cells were treated with or without 50 mM enoxacin. An formation, Figure S2) [9]. At 120 mM, enoxacin started optimum RNAi-enhancing effect by enoxacin was ob- Cell Research | Vol 18 No 10 | October 2008 Qiangzhe Zhang et al. npg 1079 served when the siRNA concentration was at 8.4×10–10 (2003CB114403), National Natural Science Foundation M. Generally, enoxacin can reduce the amount of siRNA of China (20272029, 20572053, 20421202, 20432010), by 2~5-fold to achieve the same RNAi knockdown effi- Ministry of Education of China (104189) and Nankai ciency (Figure 1C). University. In summary, we have demonstrated that certain fluo- roquinolone antibiotics such as enoxacin, in addition to References their powerful clinic use for the treatment of infections in humans and animals [10], can be used to increase RNAi 1 Cullen LM, Arndt GM. Genome-wide screening for gene func- efficiency. Enoxacin can significantly reduce the amount tion using RNAi in mammalian cells. Immunol Cell Biol 2005; of siRNA (by 2~5-fold) to achieve the same RNAi effi- 83:217-223. 2 MacDonald ML, Lamerdin J, Owens S, et al. Identifying off- cacy. The precise mechanism of this RNAi enhancement target effects and hidden phenotypes of drugs in human cells. remains unclear at present. While our manuscript was in Nat Chem Biol 2006; 2:329-337. preparation, a similar finding with more detailed analysis 3 Bridge AJ, Pebernard S, Ducraux A, Nicoulaz AL, Iggo R. was reported by Jin and colleagues [11], who proposed Induction of an interferon response by RNAi vectors in mam- that enoxacin acts by potentially increasing RISC load- malian cells. Nat Genet 2003; 34:263-264. ing efficiency through a mechanism depending on the 4 Martin SE, Caplen NJ. Applications of RNA interference in protein factor TRBP. Nevertheless, one cannot rule out mammalian systems. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2007; 8:81-108. the possibility that the effect of enoxacin on RNAi is 5 Xi Z, Zhang R, Yu Z, Ouyang D. The interaction between due to the cross-interaction with human RNA helicases tylophorine B and TMV RNA. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2006; and the stabilization of RNAi molecules, especially in 16:4300-4304. view of the finding that human RNA helicase A (RHA) 6 Noble CG, Barnard FM, Maxwell A. Quinolone-DNA inter- is an active RISC component and functions in RISC as action: sequence-dependent binding to single-stranded DNA an siRNA loading factor [12]. Further mechanistic study reflects the interaction within the gyrase-DNA complex. Anti- (such as QSAR, photolabelling and affinity purification) microb Agents Chemother 2003; 47:854-862. is being actively pursued in our lab to elucidate the mo- 7 Richter S, Parolin C, Palumbo M, Palù G. Antiviral properties of quinolone-based drugs. Curr Drug Targets Infect Disord lecular basis of the observation reported here. Other ds- 2004; 4:111-116. RNA stabilizing agents are still waiting to be explored 8 Xu Y, Zhang HY, Thormeyer D, et al. Effective small interfer- for the regulation of RNAi. We believe that the finding ing RNAs and phosphorothioate antisense DNAs have dif- of small molecular RNAi enhancers could potentially be ferent preferences for target sites in the luciferase mRNAs.
Recommended publications
  • A Review on the Current Classification and Regulatory Provisions for Medicines in Drug & Cosmetic Act, in the Light of Present Day Context
    Section Pharmaindustry Commentary A Review on the Current Classification and Regulatory Provisions for Medicines in Drug & Cosmetic Act, in the light of Present Day Context Prashant Tandon1, Varun Gupta2, Ashish Ranjan3, Purav Gandhi4, Anand Kotiyal5, 3 Aastha Kapoor 3 1Founder ;2VP & Head Medical Affair; Manager Medical Affair; 5Drug Data Analyst Medical Affair, 1mg Technologies Private Limited, 4th Floor, Motorola Building, MG Road, Sector 14, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001. 4Founder, Remedy Social, C/602, Tulip Citadel, Shreyas Tekra, Ambawadi, Ahmedabad 380015, Gujarat. ABSTRACT______________________________________________________________ Background: Current classification of medicines in Conclusions: We have recommended a revised drug India under Drug and Cosmetic Act into Schedule G, classification system that is more comprehensive in coverage and H, H1, X is outdated, evolved through patchwork over eliminates the overlaps between classes. Moreover, considering the years and needs to be thoroughly updated. The the implementation challenges for such a drug classification primary aim of the scheduling system is to ensure system in the diverse and fragmented ecosystem in India, we appropriate access to medicines while balancing recommend a technology backed platform to help monitor the public health and safety. India is experiencing a rapid implementation. transition with the rising burden of chronic non- communicable diseases where regular access of Key words: Drug Classification System, Drug and Cosmetic Act affordable medicines is critical for chronic disease India, Digitization of Prescriptions, Drug Schedules in India, management to prevent complications. Methods: We Schedule H, Monitoring Drug Schedule System analyzed drugs commonly selling across India, Received: 01.09.17 | Accepted:16.09.17 through multiple information sources including 1mg drug database, PharmaTrac (AIOCD-AWACS), Corresponding Author inventory data from distributors and retailers, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinically Isolated Chlamydia Trachomatis Strains
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, JUIY 1988, p. 1080-1081 Vol. 32, No. 7 0066-4804/88/071080-02$02.00/0 Copyright © 1988, American Society for Microbiology In Vitro Activities of T-3262, NY-198, Fleroxacin (AM-833; RO 23-6240), and Other New Quinolone Agents against Clinically Isolated Chlamydia trachomatis Strains HIROSHI MAEDA,* AKIRA FUJII, KATSUHISA NAKATA, SOICHI ARAKAWA, AND SADAO KAMIDONO Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Kobe University, 7-5-1 Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe-city, Japan Received 9 December 1987/Accepted 29 March 1988 The in vitro activities of three newly developed quinolone drugs (T-3262, NY-198, and fleroxacin [AM-833; RO 23-6240]) against 10 strains of clinically isolated Chiamydia trachomatis were assessed and compared with those of other quinolones and minocycline. T-3262 (MIC for 90% of isolates tested, 0.1 ,ug/ml) was the most active of the quinolones. The NY-198 and fleroxacin MICs for 90% of isolates were 3.13 and 62.5 ,ug/ml, respectively. Recently, it has become well known that Chlamydia 1-ml sample of suspension was seeded into flat-bottomed trachomatis is an important human pathogen. It is respon- tubes with glass cover slips and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 sible not only for trachoma but also for sexually transmitted for 24 h. The monolayer was inoculated with 103 inclusion- infections, including lymphogranuloma venereum. In forming units of C. trachomatis. The tubes were centrifuged women, it causes cervicitis, endometritis, and salpingitis at 2,000 x g at 25°C for 45 min and left undisturbed at room asymptomatically (19), while in men it causes nongono- temperature for 2 h.
    [Show full text]
  • Second and Third Generation Oral Fluoroquinolones
    Therapeutic Class Overview Second and Third Generation Oral Fluoroquinolones Therapeutic Class • Overview/Summary: The second and third generation quinolones are approved to treat a variety of infections, including dermatologic, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, respiratory, as well as several miscellaneous infections.1-10 They are broad-spectrum agents that directly inhibit bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) synthesis by blocking the actions of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV, which leads to bacterial cell death.11,12 The quinolones are most active against gram-negative bacilli and gram-negative cocci.12 Ciprofloxacin has the most potent activity against gram-negative bacteria. Norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin have limited activity against streptococci and many anaerobes while levofloxacin and moxifloxacin have greater potency against gram-positive cocci, and moxifloxacin has enhanced activity against anaerobic bacteria.11-12 Gemifloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin are considered respiratory fluoroquinolones. They possess enhanced activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae while maintaining efficacy against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and atypical pathogens. Resistance to the quinolones is increasing and cross-resistance among the various agents has been documented. Two mechanisms of bacterial resistance have been identified. These include mutations in chromosomal genes (DNA gyrase and/or topoisomerase IV) and altered drug permeability across the bacterial cell membranes.11-12 Clinical Guidelines support
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment of Bacterial Urinary Tract Infections: Presence and Future
    european urology 49 (2006) 235–244 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com Review - Infections Treatment of Bacterial Urinary Tract Infections: Presence and Future Florian M.E. Wagenlehner *, Kurt G. Naber Urologic Clinic, Hospital St. Elisabeth, Straubing, Germany Article info Abstract Article history: Bacterial urinary tract infections (UTIs) are frequent infections in the Accepted December 12, 2005 outpatient as well as in the nosocomial setting. The stratification into Published online ahead of uncomplicated and complicated UTIs has proven to be clinically useful. print on January 4, 2006 Bacterial virulence factors on the one side and the integrity of the host defense mechanisms on the other side determine the course of the Keywords: infection. In uncomplicated UTIs Escherichia coli is the leading organism, Urinary tract infections (UTI) whereas in complicated UTIs the bacterial spectrum is much broader Uncomplicated and including Gram-negative and Gram-positive and often multiresistant complicated UTI organisms. The therapy of uncomplicated UTIs is almost exclusively Antibiotic resistance of antibacterial, whereas in complicated UTIs the complicating factors uropathogens have to be treated as well. There are two predominant aims in the Antibiotic treatment antimicrobial treatment of both uncomplicated and complicated UTIs: New antiinfectives for (i) rapid and effective response to therapy and prevention of recurrence treatment of UTI of the individual patient treated; (ii) prevention of emergence of resis- tance to antimicrobial chemotherapy in the microbial environment. The main drawback of current antibiotic therapies is the emergence and rapid increase of antibiotic resistance. To combat this development several strategies can be followed. Decrease the amount of antibiotics administered, optimal dosing, prevention of infection and development of new antibiotic substances.
    [Show full text]
  • A TWO-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS of ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS with 5PSQ-031 FLUOROQUINOLONE and QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS 24Th Congress Of
    A TWO-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF ADVERSE DRUG REACTIONS WITH 5PSQ-031 FLUOROQUINOLONE AND QUINOLONE ANTIBIOTICS 24th Congress of V. Borsi1, M. Del Lungo2, L. Giovannetti1, M.G. Lai1, M. Parrilli1 1 Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Pharmacovigilance Centre, Florence, Italy 2 Dept. of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), 27-29 March 2019 Section of Pharmacology and Toxicology , University of Florence, Italy BACKGROUND PURPOSE On 9 February 2017, the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) initiated a review1 of disabling To review the adverse drugs and potentially long-lasting side effects reported with systemic and inhaled quinolone and fluoroquinolone reactions (ADRs) of antibiotics at the request of the German medicines authority (BfArM) following reports of long-lasting side effects systemic and inhaled in the national safety database and the published literature. fluoroquinolone and quinolone antibiotics that MATERIAL AND METHODS involved peripheral and central nervous system, Retrospective analysis of ADRs reported in our APVD involving ciprofloxacin, flumequine, levofloxacin, tendons, muscles and joints lomefloxacin, moxifloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, pefloxacin, prulifloxacin, rufloxacin, cinoxacin, nalidixic acid, reported from our pipemidic given systemically (by mouth or injection). The period considered is September 2016 to September Pharmacovigilance 2018. Department (PVD). RESULTS 22 ADRs were reported in our PVD involving fluoroquinolone and quinolone antibiotics in the period considered and that affected peripheral or central nervous system, tendons, muscles and joints. The mean patient age was 67,3 years (range: 17-92 years). 63,7% of the ADRs reported were serious, of which 22,7% caused hospitalization and 4,5% caused persistent/severe disability. 81,8% of the ADRs were reported by a healthcare professional (physician, pharmacist or other) and 18,2% by patient or a non-healthcare professional.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigerian Veterinary Journal 39(3)
    Nigerian Veterinary Journal 39(3). 2018 Asambe et al. NIGERIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL ISSN 0331-3026 Nig. Vet. J., September 2018 Vol 39 (3): 199 -208. https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/nvj.v39i3.3 ORIGINAL ARTICLE In Vitro Comparative Activity of Ciprofloxacin and Enrofloxacin against Clinical Isolates from Chickens in Benue State, Nigeria Asambe, A.1*; Babashani, M2. and Salisu, U. S.1 ¹.Federal University Dutsinma, Katsina State. 2.Ahmadu Bello University Zaria. *Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]; Tel No:+2348063103254 SUMMARY This study compares the in vitro activities of enrofloxacin and its main metabolite ciprofloxacin against clinical Escherichia coli and non-lactose fermenting enterobacteria isolates from chickens. Ten (10) Escherichia coli and 8 non lactose fermenting enterobacteriaceae species isolated from a pool of clinical cases at the Microbiology Laboratory of the Veterinary Teaching Hospital, University of Agriculture Makurdi were used in this study. Ten-fold serial dilution of 10 varying concentrations (0.1-50μg/mL) of enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were tested against the isolates in vitro by Bauer’s disc-diffusion method to determine and compare their antimicrobial activities against the isolates. The 18 isolates tested were susceptible to both enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, and their mean values in the susceptibility of Escherichia coli and non-lactose fermenters were significantly different (p < 0.01). The study concluded that the clinical isolates are susceptible to both enrofloxacin and ciprofloxacin though ciprofloxacin exhibit higher activity. Comparatively, ciprofloxacin was found to be more potent than enrofloxacin and the difference statistically significant. Ciprofloxacin was recommended as a better choice in the treatment of bacterial infections of chicken in this area compared to enrofloxacin.
    [Show full text]
  • Maxaquin® Lomefloxacin Hydrochloride Tablets to Reduce The
    Maxaquin® lomefloxacin hydrochloride tablets To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of Maxaquin and other antibacterial drugs, Maxaquin should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by bacteria. DESCRIPTION Maxaquin (lomefloxacin HCl) is a synthetic broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent for oral administration. Lomefloxacin HCl, a difluoroquinolone, is the monohydrochloride salt of (±)-1-ethyl-6, 8-difluoro-1, 4-dihydro-7-(3-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-4-oxo-3- quinolinecarboxylic acid. Its empirical formula is C17H19F2N3O3·HCl, and its structural formula is: Lomefloxacin HCl is a white to pale yellow powder with a molecular weight of 387.8. It is slightly soluble in water and practically insoluble in alcohol. Lomefloxacin HCl is stable to heat and moisture but is sensitive to light in dilute aqueous solution. Maxaquin is available as a film-coated tablet formulation containing 400 mg of lomefloxacin base, present as the hydrochloride salt. The base content of the hydrochloride salt is 90.6%. The inactive ingredients are carboxymethylcellulose calcium, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hypromellose, lactose, magnesium stearate, polyethylene glycol, polyoxyl 40 stearate, and titanium dioxide. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers: In 6 fasting healthy male volunteers, approximately 95% to 98% of a single oral dose of lomefloxacin was absorbed. Absorption was rapid following single doses of 200 and 400 mg (Tmax 0.8 to 1.4 hours). Mean
    [Show full text]
  • Fluoroquinolones for Treating Tuberculosis (Presumed Drug- Sensitive) (Review)
    Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis (presumed drug- sensitive) (Review) Ziganshina LE, Titarenko AF, Davies GR This is a reprint of a Cochrane review, prepared and maintained by The Cochrane Collaboration and published in The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 6 http://www.thecochranelibrary.com Fluoroquinolones for treating tuberculosis (presumed drug-sensitive) (Review) Copyright © 2013 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS HEADER....................................... 1 ABSTRACT ...................................... 1 PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR THE MAIN COMPARISON . ..... 3 BACKGROUND .................................... 5 OBJECTIVES ..................................... 6 METHODS ...................................... 6 RESULTS....................................... 9 Figure1. ..................................... 10 Figure2. ..................................... 12 ADDITIONALSUMMARYOFFINDINGS . 15 DISCUSSION ..................................... 20 Figure3. ..................................... 20 Figure4. ..................................... 21 AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS . 23 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 23 REFERENCES ..................................... 24 CHARACTERISTICSOFSTUDIES . 30 DATAANDANALYSES. 60 Analysis 1.1. Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones plus standard regimen (HRZE) versus standard regimen alone (HRZE), Outcome1Deathfromanycause. 61 Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Fluoroquinolones plus standard regimen (HRZE) versus standard regimen alone (HRZE), Outcome2TB-relateddeath.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice (2Nd Edition) Iii
    ii Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice (2nd edition) iii Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice, 2nd edition Publisher: Companion Animal Group, Danish Veterinary Association, Peter Bangs Vej 30, 2000 Frederiksberg Authors of the guidelines: Lisbeth Rem Jessen (University of Copenhagen) Peter Damborg (University of Copenhagen) Anette Spohr (Evidensia Faxe Animal Hospital) Sandra Goericke-Pesch (University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover) Rebecca Langhorn (University of Copenhagen) Geoffrey Houser (University of Copenhagen) Jakob Willesen (University of Copenhagen) Mette Schjærff (University of Copenhagen) Thomas Eriksen (University of Copenhagen) Tina Møller Sørensen (University of Copenhagen) Vibeke Frøkjær Jensen (DTU-VET) Flemming Obling (Greve) Luca Guardabassi (University of Copenhagen) Reproduction of extracts from these guidelines is only permitted in accordance with the agreement between the Ministry of Education and Copy-Dan. Danish copyright law restricts all other use without written permission of the publisher. Exception is granted for short excerpts for review purposes. iv Foreword The first edition of the Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice was published in autumn of 2012. The aim of the guidelines was to prevent increased antibiotic resistance. A questionnaire circulated to Danish veterinarians in 2015 (Jessen et al., DVT 10, 2016) indicated that the guidelines were well received, and particularly that active users had followed the recommendations. Despite a positive reception and the results of this survey, the actual quantity of antibiotics used is probably a better indicator of the effect of the first guidelines. Chapter two of these updated guidelines therefore details the pattern of developments in antibiotic use, as reported in DANMAP 2016 (www.danmap.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Dead Bugs Don't Mutate: Susceptibility Issues in the Emergence of Bacterial Resistance
    PERSPECTIVES Dead Bugs Don’t Mutate: Susceptibility Issues in the Emergence of Bacterial Resistance Charles W. Stratton*1 The global emergence of antibacterial resistance among and macrolides (the antibacterial agents used most frequently common and atypical respiratory pathogens in the last decade for pneumococcal infections) have become prevalent through- necessitates the strategic application of antibacterial agents. out the world. Indeed, rates of S. pneumoniae resistance to The use of bactericidal rather than bacteriostatic agents as penicillin now exceed 40% in many regions, and a high pro- first-line therapy is recommended because the eradication of portion of these strains are also resistant to macrolides. More- microorganisms serves to curtail, although not avoid, the devel- over, the trend is growing rapidly. Whereas 10.4% of all S. opment of bacterial resistance. Bactericidal activity is achieved with specific classes of antimicrobial agents as well as by com- pneumoniae isolates were resistant to penicillin and 16.5% bination therapy. Newer classes of antibacterial agents, such resistant to macrolides in 1996, these proportions rose to as the fluoroquinolones and certain members of the macrolide/ 14.1% and 21.9%, respectively, in 1997 (9). A more recent lincosamine/streptogramin class have increased bactericidal susceptibility study conducted in 2000–2001 showed that activity compared with traditional agents. More recently, the 51.5% of all S. pneumoniae isolates were resistant to penicillin ketolides (novel, semisynthetic, erythromycin-A derivatives) and 30.0% to macrolides (10). have demonstrated potent bactericidal activity against key res- The urgent need to curtail proliferation of antibacterial- piratory pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Hae- resistant bacteria has refocused attention on the proper use of mophilus influenzae, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Moraxella antibacterial agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Cr
    Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Crizotinib (PF-02341066) 1 4 55 Docetaxel 1 5 98 Anastrozole 1 6 25 Cladribine 1 7 23 Methotrexate 1 8 -187 Letrozole 1 9 65 Entecavir Hydrate 1 10 48 Roxadustat (FG-4592) 1 11 19 Imatinib Mesylate (STI571) 1 12 0 Sunitinib Malate 1 13 34 Vismodegib (GDC-0449) 1 14 64 Paclitaxel 1 15 89 Aprepitant 1 16 94 Decitabine 1 17 -79 Bendamustine HCl 1 18 19 Temozolomide 1 19 -111 Nepafenac 1 20 24 Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 1 21 -43 Lapatinib (GW-572016) Ditosylate 1 22 88 Temsirolimus (CCI-779, NSC 683864) 1 23 96 Belinostat (PXD101) 1 24 46 Capecitabine 1 25 19 Bicalutamide 1 26 83 Dutasteride 1 27 68 Epirubicin HCl 1 28 -59 Tamoxifen 1 29 30 Rufinamide 1 30 96 Afatinib (BIBW2992) 1 31 -54 Lenalidomide (CC-5013) 1 32 19 Vorinostat (SAHA, MK0683) 1 33 38 Rucaparib (AG-014699,PF-01367338) phosphate1 34 14 Lenvatinib (E7080) 1 35 80 Fulvestrant 1 36 76 Melatonin 1 37 15 Etoposide 1 38 -69 Vincristine sulfate 1 39 61 Posaconazole 1 40 97 Bortezomib (PS-341) 1 41 71 Panobinostat (LBH589) 1 42 41 Entinostat (MS-275) 1 43 26 Cabozantinib (XL184, BMS-907351) 1 44 79 Valproic acid sodium salt (Sodium valproate) 1 45 7 Raltitrexed 1 46 39 Bisoprolol fumarate 1 47 -23 Raloxifene HCl 1 48 97 Agomelatine 1 49 35 Prasugrel 1 50 -24 Bosutinib (SKI-606) 1 51 85 Nilotinib (AMN-107) 1 52 99 Enzastaurin (LY317615) 1 53 -12 Everolimus (RAD001) 1 54 94 Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) 1 55 24 Thalidomide 1 56 40 Tivozanib (AV-951) 1 57 86 Fludarabine
    [Show full text]
  • Zagam® (Sparfloxacin) Tablets Contain Sparfloxacin, a Synthetic Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Agent for Oral Administration
    Zagam Rx only DESCRIPTION: Zagam® (sparfloxacin) tablets contain sparfloxacin, a synthetic broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent for oral administration. Sparfloxacin, an aminodifluoroquinolone, is 5-Amino-1-cyclopropyl-7-(cis-3,5-dimethyl-1- piperazinyl)-6,8-difluoro-1,4-dihydro-4-oxo-3-quinolinecarboxylic acid. Its empirical formula is C19H22F2N4O3 and it has the following chemical structure: Sparfloxacin has a molecular weight of 392.41. It occurs as a yellow crystalline powder. It is sparingly soluble in glacial acetic acid or chloroform, very slightly soluble in ethanol (95%), and practically insoluble in water and ether. It dissolves in dilute acetic acid or 0.1 N sodium hydroxide. Zagam is available as a 200-mg round, white film-coated tablet. Each 200-mg tablet contains the following inactive ingredients: microcrystalline cellulose NF, corn 1 Zagam starch NF, L-hydroxypropylcellulose NF, magnesium stearate NF, and colloidal silicone dioxide NF. The film coating contains: methylhydroxypropylcellulose USP, polyethylene glycol 6000, and titanium dioxide USP. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY: Absorption: Sparfloxacin is well absorbed following oral administration with an absolute oral bioavailability of 92%. The mean maximum plasma sparfloxacin concentration following a single 400-mg oral dose was approximately 1.3 (±0.2) µg/mL. The area under the curve (mean AUC0→∞) following a single 400-mg oral dose was approximately 34 (±6.8) µg•hr/mL. Steady-state plasma concentration was achieved on the first day by giving a loading dose that was double the daily dose. Mean (± SD) pharmacokinetic parameters observed for the 24-hour dosing interval with the recommended dosing regimen are shown below: Dosing Regimen Peak Trough AUC0→24 (mg/day) Cmax C24 (µg/mL) hr.
    [Show full text]