DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Robert De Beaumont, 1St Earl of Leicester

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Robert De Beaumont, 1St Earl of Leicester Proven Companions of William of Normandy at the Battle of Hastings (source: William of Poitiers, unless attributed elsewhere – all via Wikipedia) 1. Robert de Beaumont, 1st Earl of Leicester "A certain Norman, Robert, son of Roger of Beaumont, being nephew and heir to Henry, Count of Meulan, through Henry's sister Adeline, found himself that day in battle for the first time. He was as yet but a young man and he performed feats of valour worthy of perpetual remembrance. At the head of a troop which he commanded on the right wing he attacked with the utmost bravery and success."] 2. Eustace II, Count of Boulogne "With a harsh voice he (Duke William) called to Eustace of Boulogne, who with 50 knights was turning in flight and was about to give the signal for retreat. This man came up to the Duke and said in his ear that he ought to retire since he would court death if he went forward. But at the very moment when he uttered the words Eustace was struck between the shoulders with such force that blood gushed out from his mouth and nose and half dead he only made his escape with the aid of his followers” 3. William, Count of Evreux 4. Geoffrey of Mortagne, Count of Montagne and Lord of Nogent, later Count of Perche 5. William FitzOsbern, 1st Earl of Hereford 6. Aimeri Viscount of Thouars 7. Walter Giffard, Lord of Longueville 8. Hugh de Montfort, Lord of Montfort-sur-Risle 9. Ralph de Tosny, Lord of Conches 10. Hugh de Grandmesnil 11. William de Warenne, 1st Earl of Surrey 12. William Malet, Lord of Graville "His (King Harold's) corpse was brought into the Duke's camp and William gave it for burial to William, surnamed Malet, and not to Harold's mother, who offered for the body of her beloved son its weight in gold." 13. Odo, Bishop of Bayeux, later Earl of Kent (source: Bayeux Tapestry). Hic Odo Eps (Episcopus) Baculu(m) Tenens Confortat Pueros." (Here Odo the Bishop holding a club strengthens the boys). 14. Turstin FitzRolf (source: Orderic Vitalis) 15. Engenulf de Laigle (source: Orderic Vitalis) 16. Geoffrey de Mowbray, Bishop of Coutances 17. Robert, Count of Mortain (source: Bayeux Tapestry) 18. Wadard, believed to be Follower of Bishop of Bayeux (source: Bayeux Tapestry) 19. Vital, believed to be Follower of Bishop of Bayeux (source: Bayeux Tapestry) 20. Goubert d’Auffay, Seigneur of Auffay (Source: Orderic Vitalis) 21. Humphrey of Tilleul-en-Auge (source: Orderic Vitalis) "There were present in this battle: Eustace, Count of Boulogne; William, son of Richard, Count of Evreux; Geoffrey, son of Rotrou, Count of Mortagne; William FitzOsbern; Haimo, Vicomte of Thouars; Walter Giffard; Hugh of Montfort-sur-Risle; Rodulf of Tosny; Hugh of Grantmesnil; William of Warenne, and many other most renowned warriors whose names are worthy to be commemorated in histories among the bravest soldiers of all time." Sources French Wikipedia, Compagnons de Guillaume le Conquérant Cokayne's Complete Peerage, Revised edition, vol.12, Appendix L, pp. 47–48 Douglas, David C. & Greenaway, George W. (Eds.) English Historical Documents 1042-1189, London, 1959. "William of Poitiers: the Deeds of William, Duke of the Normans and King of the English," pp. 217–232 & "The Bayeux Tapestry," pp. 232–279. Mason, J.F.A., "The Companions of the Conqueror: An Additional Name," The English Historical Review, Vol. 71, No. 278 (Jan., 1956), pp. 61–69. External sources[edit] French Wikipedia, Compagnons de Guillaume le Conquérant C. P. Lewis, "Companions of the Conqueror (1066–1071)," Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press. read online. Battle Abbey Roll Liste de l'abbaye de la Bataille Roll of Dives-sur-Mer. Liste de Dives-sur-Mer Roll of Falaise. Liste de Falaise Further reading[edit] Camp, Anthony J. My Ancestors Came With the Conqueror: those who did and some of those who probably did not. Society of Genealogists, 1990, pp89. Douglas, David C. Companions of the Conqueror, Jnl of History, vol.28, 1943, pp. 129–147 Mason, J.F.A. "The Companions of the Conqueror: An Additional Name," English Historical Review, vol.71, no.278, 1956, pp. 61–69 Planché, J.R. The Conqueror and his Companions, 1874 Moriarty, G. Andrews, "The Companions of The Conqueror," published in The American Genealogist, Vol.21, No. 2, October 1944, pp. 111–113 Robert, Count of Mortain, (Robert de Mortain) unofficially, 2nd Earl of Cornwall (c. 1031–1090) was a Norman nobleman and the half-brother of William the Conqueror. He was one of the few proven companions of William at the Battle of Hastings and as recorded in the Domesday Book of 1086 was one of the greatest landholders in his half- brother's new Kingdom. Life Robert was the son of Herluin de Conteville and Herleva of Falaise and brother of Odo of Bayeux. He was born c. 1031 in Normandy, a half-brother of William the Conqueror and was probably not more than a year or so younger than his brother Odo, born c. 1030. About 1035, Herluin, along with his wife Herleva and Robert, founded Grestain Abbey. In c. 1049 his brother, Duke William made him Count of Mortain in place of William Werlenc, who had been banished by Duke William; according to Orderic Vitalis, on a single word. William Werlenc was a grandson of Duke Richard and therefore a cousin once removed to William, Duke of Normandy. Securing the southern border of Normandy was critical to Duke William and Robert was entrusted with this key county which guarded the borders of Brittany and Belleme. In early 1066, Robert was present at both the first council, that of William's inner circle, and the second larger council held to discuss the Duke's planned conquest of England. Robert agreed to provide 120 ships to the invasion fleet, which was more than any other of William's magnates.[ Robert was one of those few known to have been at the Battle of Hastings in 1066. He is pictured at a dinner at Pevensey on the Bayeux Tapestry, seated with his brothers William and Odo on the day of the landing in England. When granting the monastery of St Michael’s Mount to the Norman monastery on the Mont-Saint-Michel, Robert recorded that he had fought at the Battle of Hastings under the banner of St Michel. Robert's contribution to the success of the invasion was clearly regarded as highly significant by the Conqueror, who awarded him a large share of the spoils; in total 797 manors at the time of Domesday. However, the greatest concentration of his honors lay in Cornwall where he held virtually all of that county and was considered by some the Earl of Cornwall. While Robert held lands in twenty counties, the majority of his holdings in certain counties was as few as five manors. The overall worth of his estates was £2100. He administered most of his southwestern holdings from Launceston, Cornwall, and Montacute, Somerset. The holding of single greatest importance, however, was the Rape of Pevensey, East Sussex, which protected one of the more vulnerable parts of the south coast of England. In 1069, together with Robert of Eu, he led an army against a force of Danes in Lindsay and effected great slaughter against them. After that there is little mention of Robert who appears to have been an absentee landholder spending the majority of his time in Normandy. Along with his brother, Odo, he participated in a revolt in 1088 against William II but afterwards he was pardoned. On 8 December 1090 Robert died and chose to be buried at the Abbey of Grestain near his father and next to his first wife Matilda. He was described by William of Malmesbury in his Gesta Regum as a man of stupid dull disposition (crassi et hebetis ingenii). but William the Conqueror considered him one of his greatest supporters and trusted him with the important county of Mortain. This was a trust he would hardly place in someone who was in any way incompetent. Further clues to his character are found in the Vita of Vitalis of Savigny, a very wise monk who Robert sought out as his chaplain. One incident tells of Robert beating his wife and Vital, intervening, threatened to end the marriage if Robert did not repent. In still another entry Vital tells of his leaving Robert's service abruptly and after being escorted back to him, Robert begged for Vital's pardon for his actions. Overall, Robert was proficient in every duty William assigned him, he was a religious man yet ill-tempered enough to beat his wife, but not himself known as a man of great wisdom. Robert was married to Matilda, daughter of Roger de Montgomery, 1st Earl of Shrewsbury, before 1066 and together they had: William, Count of Mortain, who succeeded him. Agnes who married André de Vitré, seigneur of Vitré. Denise, married in 1078 to Guy, 3rd Sire de La Val. Emma of Mortain, the wife of William IV of Poulouse. After Matilda de Montgomery's death c. 1085 Robert secondly married Almodis. The couple had no children. On screen, Robert has been portrayed by Gordon Whiting in the two-part BBC TV play Conquest (1966), part of the series, Theatre 625, and by Richard Ireson in the TV drama Blood Royal: William the Conqueror (1990). 1. His position of authority in the south west has led many to consider him as the Earl of Cornwall, although it appears uncertain whether he was formally created as such.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Odo, Bishop of Bayeux and Earl of Kent
    ( 55 ) ODO, BISHOP OF BAYEUX AND EARL OF KENT. BY SER REGINALD TOWER, K.C.M.G., C.Y.O. IN the volumes of Archceologia Cantiana there occur numerous references to Bishop Odo, half-brother of William the Conqueror ; and his name finds frequent mention in Hasted's History of Kent, chiefly in connection with the lands he possessed. Further, throughout the records of the early Norman chroniclers, the Bishop of Bayeux is constantly cited among the outstanding figures in the reigns of William the Conqueror and of his successor William Rufus, as well as in the Duchy of Normandy. It seems therefore strange that there should be (as I am given to understand) no Life of the Bishop beyond the article in the Dictionary of National Biography. In the following notes I have attempted to collate available data from contemporary writers, aided by later historians of the period during, and subsequent to, the Norman Conquest. Odo of Bayeux was the son of Herluin of Conteville and Herleva (Arlette), daughter of Eulbert the tanner of Falaise. Herleva had .previously given birth to William the Conqueror by Duke Robert of Normandy. Odo's younger brother was Robert, Earl of Morton (Mortain). Odo was born about 1036, and brought up at the Court of Normandy. In early youth, about 1049, when he was attending the Council of Rheims, his half-brother, William, bestowed on him the Bishopric of Bayeux. He was present, in 1066, at the Conference summoned at Lillebonne, by Duke William after receipt of the news of Harold's succession to the throne of England.
    [Show full text]
  • British Royal Banners 1199–Present
    British Royal Banners 1199 – Present Geoff Parsons & Michael Faul Abstract The presentation begins with the (accepted) date of 1199, the death of King Richard I, the first king known to have used the three gold lions on red. It continues to show how King Edward III added the French Royal Arms, consequent to his claim to the French throne. There is then the change from “France Ancient” to “France Modern” by King Henry IV in 1405, which set the pattern of the arms and the standard for the next 198 years. The story then proceeds to show how, over the ensuing 234 years, there were no fewer than six versions of the standard until the adoption of the present pattern in 1837. The presentation includes pictures of all the designs, noting that, in the early stages, the arms appeared more often as a surcoat than a flag. There is also some anecdotal information regarding the various patterns. Anne (1702–1714) Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Vexillology, Washington, D.C., USA 1–5 August 2011 © 2011 North American Vexillological Association (www.nava.org) 799 British Royal Banners 1199 – Present Figure 1 Introduction The presentation begins with the (accepted) date of 1199, the death of King Richard I, the first king known to have used the three gold lions on red. Although we often refer to these flags as Royal Standards, strictly speaking, they are not standard but heraldic banners which are based on the Coats of Arms of the British Monarchs. Figure 2 William I (1066–1087) The first use of the coats of arms would have been exactly that, worn as surcoats by medieval knights.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 104 William M. Aird, Robert Curthose Duke Of
    H-France Review Volume 12 (2012) Page 1 H-France Review Vol. 12 (August 2012), No. 104 William M. Aird, Robert Curthose duke of Normandy (c. 1050-1134). Woodbridge: The Boydell Press, 2008. xx + 328 pp. Abbreviations, maps, genealogy, bibliography, and index. $99.00 U.S. (hb). ISBN 1-84383-310-9; $34.95 U.S. (pb). ISBN 1-8483-660-5. Review by Stephanie Mooers Christelow, Idaho State University. In this work, William Aird offers an account of the life and struggles of Robert Curthose, William the Conqueror’s eldest son, would-be king of England, and challenged duke of Normandy. This is the first biography of the duke since that published nearly a century ago by C. W. David in 1920 and one the few treatments to appear in print during the late twentieth century, although landmark studies of Robert’s brothers and kings of England, William Rufus (1087-1100) and Henry I (1100-1135), contain significant analyses of Curthose and Normandy during their reigns.[1] The most influential twelfth-century historian is Orderic Vitalis, a monk of St- Évroul, Normandy who portrayed Robert Curthose as lazy, pathetic and inept [2], a depiction accepted by C. W. David. David argued that Robert Curthose’s failures rested on his deficient temperament and his actions endangered the stability of one of France’s most important principalities. However, as a result of his thorough and meticulous research, Aird finds it necessary to counter these negative images of the duke. He contends that Curthose was a skilled diplomat, a good governor, a pious Christian and a heroic crusader, and he sets out to establish Robert’s good character through a review of the surviving evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Southampton Research Repository Eprints Soton
    University of Southampton Research Repository ePrints Soton Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination http://eprints.soton.ac.uk i UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES School of History The Wydeviles 1066-1503 A Re-assessment by Lynda J. Pidgeon Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 15 December 2011 ii iii ABSTRACT Who were the Wydeviles? The family arrived with the Conqueror in 1066. As followers in the Conqueror’s army the Wydeviles rose through service with the Mowbray family. If we accept the definition given by Crouch and Turner for a brief period of time the Wydeviles qualified as barons in the twelfth century. This position was not maintained. By the thirteenth century the family had split into two distinct branches. The senior line settled in Yorkshire while the junior branch settled in Northamptonshire. The junior branch of the family gradually rose to prominence in the county through service as escheator, sheriff and knight of the shire.
    [Show full text]
  • Launde Priory 1
    21 MAY 2018 LAUNDE PRIORY 1 actswilliam2henry1.wordpress.com Release date Version notes Who Current version: H1-Launde-2018-1 21/5/2018 Original version DXC Previous versions: — — — — This text is made available through the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs License; additional terms may apply Authors for attribution statement: Charters of William II and Henry I Project David X Carpenter, Faculty of History, University of Oxford LAUNDE PRIORY Augustinian priory of St John the Baptist County of Leicestershire : Diocese of Lincoln Founded 1121 × c. 1125 Launde priory was one of the early Augustinian houses in England, established 1120 × c. 1125. According to a narrative concerning the early years of Holy Trinity priory in Aldgate, London, known only from fifteenth-century manuscripts, Bernard prior of Dunstaple, John prior of Launde (Landa), Geoffrey de Clinton, the (king’s) chamberlain (Gaufridus camerarius de Clinton), and others named, witnessed the gift of the Cnihtengild in London to Holy Trinity in that year. It is unsurprising that the priors of two recently founded Augustinian houses should witness a gift to Holy Trinity, thought to be the first Augustinian house in England. Their names were presumably taken from a contemporary deed or other record which has not been preserved (Hodgett, Cartulary of Holy Trinity, 168, no. 871; R. R. Sharpe, Calendar of Letter Books, C, 220). The king’s confirmation of the gift, 000, Regesta 1467, also witnessed by Geoffrey de Clinton, is apparently authentic and datable 1123 × 1127, so the narrative’s date of 1125 may well be accurate. Launde priory was founded at Loddington, ‘in cuius territorio abbatia fundata est’, according to Henry II’s general confirmation of 1155 × 1158 (H2/1456).
    [Show full text]
  • The Bretons and Normans of England 1066-1154: the Family, the Fief and the Feudal Monarchy*
    © K.S.B. Keats-Rohan 1991. Published Nottingham Mediaeval Studies 36 (1992), 42-78 The Bretons and Normans of England 1066-1154: the family, the fief and the feudal monarchy* In memoriam R.H.C.Davis 1. The Problem (i) the non-Norman Conquest Of all the available studies of the Norman Conquest none has been more than tangentially concerned with the fact, acknowledged by all, that the regional origin of those who participated in or benefited from that conquest was not exclusively Norman. The non-Norman element has generally been regarded as too small to warrant more than isolated comment. No more than a handful of Angevins and Poitevins remained to hold land in England from the new English king; only slightly greater was the number of Flemish mercenaries, while the presence of Germans and Danes can be counted in ones and twos. More striking is the existence of the fief of the count of Boulogne in eastern England. But it is the size of the Breton contingent that is generally agreed to be the most significant. Stenton devoted several illuminating pages of his English Feudalism to the Bretons, suggesting for them an importance which he was uncertain how to define.1 To be sure, isolated studies of these minority groups have appeared, such as that of George Beech on the Poitevins, or those of J.H.Round and more recently Michael Jones on the Bretons.2 But, invaluable as such studies undoubtedly are, they tend to achieve no more for their subjects than the status of feudal curiosities, because they detach their subjects from the wider question of just what was the nature of the post-1066 ruling class of which they formed an integral part.
    [Show full text]
  • Belgrave Stuart Galloway
    U3A WTT Belgrave Stuart Galloway Route Summary A circular walk around historic Belgrave. Route Overview Category: Walking Length: 6.430 km / 4.02 mi Parking: The Sidings LE4 3BR Last Modified: 1st March 2017 Difficulty: Medium Rating: Unrated Surface: Average Refreshments: Platform Cafe The Sidings Date Published: 1st March 2017 Description This is an urban walk which crosses several busy roads so care should be taken. Some muddy patches after rain along the river. Waypoints Great Central Railway (52.66658; -1.13374) The Great Central Railway is now a heritage railway which links Leicester and Nottingham. Leicester North Station is the southernmost station. It is on the route of the original railway that linked Manchester, Sheffield, Nottingham and Leicester with London Marylebone. It was originally called Belgrave and Birstall Station. Following Beecham's sentence of death it became derelict but was restored by the Main Line Steam Trust and is now the site of a proposed new heritage railway museum. Backed by £10 million from the Heritage Lottery Fund, it is set to open in 2021 Walk down The Sidings, turn left and proceed a few yards along Redhill Way, turning left into Belgrave Cemetery Belgrave Cemetry (52.66637; -1.13221) 1 / 7 During the 1800's owing to the rapidly expanding towns and cities, sanitation was becoming appalling with diseases; such as cholera becoming mass killers. Up until about the middle of the 1800's those who died in urban areas such as Belgrave were buried in urban churchyards and had been for about 850 years since the Norman Conquest.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment for Land Off Seagrave Road, Sileby, Leicestershire (SK 610 158)
    An archaeological desk-based assessment for land off Seagrave Road, Sileby, Leicestershire (SK 610 158) Leon Hunt ULAS Report No 2011-202 ©2012 An archaeological desk-based assessment for land off Seagrave Road, Sileby, Leicestershire (SK 610 158) Leon Hunt for: Hazelton Homes Checked by: Signed: Date: ……18.01.2012……. Name: ...Patrick Clay........................... University of Leicester Archaeological Services University Rd., Leicester, LE1 7RH Tel: (0116) 2522848 Fax: (0116) 2522614 ULAS Report Number 2011-202 ©2012 CONTENTS Summary ........................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Aims and Methods ......................................................................................................... 1 Methodology .................................................................................................................. 2 Site Location, Geology and Topography ....................................................................... 3 Historical and Archaeological Background ................................................................... 4 Historical Background ................................................................................................... 4 Archaeological Background ........................................................................................... 5 Prehistoric .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mont Saint-Michel, France
    Mont Saint-Michel, France The beautiful Mont Saint-Michel at night The timeless treasure of Mont Saint-Michel rises from the sea like a fantasy castle. This small island, located off the coast in northern France, is attacked by the highest tides in Europe. Aubert, Bishop of Avranches, built the small church at the request of the Archangel Michael, chief of the ethereal militia. A small church was dedicated on October 16, 709. The Duke of Normandy requested a community of Benedictines to live on the rock in 966. It led to the construction of the pre-Romanesque church over the peak of the rock. The very first monastery buildings were established along the north wall of the church. The 12th century saw an extension of the buildings to the west and south. In the 14th century, the abbey was protected behind some military constructions, to escape the effects of the Hundred Years War. However, in the 15th century, the Romanesque church was substituted with the Gothic Flamboyant chancel. The medieval castle turned church has become one of the important tourist destinations of France. The township consists of several shops, restaurants, and small hotels. Travel Tips Remember that the tides here are very rough. Do not try to walk over sand as it is dangerous. Get the help of a guide if you wish to take a stroll over the tidal mudflats. The Mount has steep steps; climb carefully. Mont St-Michel Location Map Facts about Mont St-Michel The Mont St-Michel and its Bay were inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bayeux Tapestry Embroiderers Story PDF Book
    THE BAYEUX TAPESTRY EMBROIDERERS STORY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Jan Messent | 112 pages | 01 Jan 2011 | Search Press Ltd | 9781844485840 | English | Tunbridge Wells, United Kingdom The Bayeux Tapestry Embroiderers Story PDF Book Lists with This Book. Oxford University Press. The tapestry is a band of linen feet 70 metres long and Want to Read saving…. Is any historical primary source of information entirely reliable? Richard Burt, University of Florida. Reopening with new conditions: Only the gallery of the Tapestry is open, the interpretation floors remain closed Timetable: 9. The Latin textual inscriptions above the story-boards use Old English letter forms, and stylistically the work has parallels in Anglo-Saxon illuminated manuscripts. What's on? According to Sylvette Lemagnen, conservator of the tapestry, in her book La Tapisserie de Bayeux :. Hearing this news, William decides to cross the Channel in to reclaim his throne…. With a visit to the museum, you can discover the complete Bayeux Tapestry, study it close up without causing damage to it, and understand its history and how it was created thanks to an audio-guide commentary available in 16 languages. Rachelle DeMunck rated it it was amazing Sep 06, Open Preview See a Problem? Heather Cawte rated it it was amazing Apr 05, American historian Stephen D. The design and embroidery of the tapestry form one of the narrative strands of Marta Morazzoni 's novella The Invention of Truth. It required special storage in with the threatened invasion of Normandy in the Franco-Prussian War and again in — by the Ahnenerbe during the German occupation of France and the Normandy landings.
    [Show full text]
  • Domesday in Rutland — the Dramatis Personae
    Domesday Book in Rutland The Dramatis Personae Prince Yuri Galitzine DOMESDAY BOOK IN RUTLAND The Dramatis Personae by Prince Yuri Galitzine Rutland Record Society 1986 1986 Published by Rutland Record Society Rutland County Museum, Oakham LE15 6HW © Prince Yuri Galitzine 1986 ISBN 0907464 05 X The extract Roteland by courtesy of Leicestershire Museums and the Domesday Map of Rutland by courtesy of the General Editor, Victoria County History of Rutland The Dramatis Personae of Domesday Book The story of Domesday Book only comes alive when we try to find more about those persons who are mentioned in it by name. The Domesday Book records the names of each of three categories of landowners – the tenants‑in‑chief and the tenants in 1086 – TRW = Tempore Regis Guilielmi and the antecessors, the name given to those who held in 1066 – TRE = Tempore Regis Edwardii. Throughout the whole of England about 200 tenants‑in‑chief arc recorded in Domesday Book holding from the King as overlord of whom 15 held in Rutland. About another 5,000 throughout England held as tenants directly of the King or of his tenants‑in‑chief by knight’s fees. Of the latter, there were 16 in Rutland. Sadly the majority of persons referred to in the record are not identified by name. These are people the landowners controlled and who were established in the villages of Rutland. They comprised 10 priests, 142 freemen, 1147 villagers, 244 small holders and 21 slaves (two of whom were women) ‑ a total of 1564. The tenants-in-chief Not unnaturally as Rutland had been the dowry of the Queens of England since 964, King William had in his direct control the largest share of the lands in Rutland – 24 carucates and 39 hides comprising the town of Oakham and 14 manors valued at £193 12s.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019-04 Volume 2 Issue 2 the St. John
    in this issue >>> Volume 2 • A possible identification of Ralph St. Issue 2 John, living in 1053. • Follow-up to an Adoption solved with Newsletter DNA. Est. 2018 • George St. John & Nancy Bryan February, March & April 2019 An Insight into the St. John Family of Highlight FOCUS ON primaryr ecords current topics >>> George St. John & Nancy Bryan Why a family newsletter Discovered Information to explain NPEs by Suzanne St. John By Suzanne St. John The descendants of George St. John and Nancy logical that the children, that appeared to have The St. Johns of Highlight, Glamorgan, Wales are Bryan have been challenging to sort out. Before been born after 1793, were both George and DNA testing came along, and before researchers Nancy’s children but exact birth dates are lost in Modern History. The individuals of this realized there were St. John and de Port-St. John unknown. family, their ancestors and descendants have been families living in America, it seemed logical to conclude that any St. Johns found in a general Berry, Thomas, William, Elizabeth, Sarah, and merged, confounded, and obliterated into non- vicinity of one another were biologically Martha do not have any descendants who have existence by well-meaning researchers, heralds, related. This was certainly true for the tested in our project. However, for Arthur, and family before us. It is our responsibility and researchers for George and Nancy. Martin and Abner we do have 7 test subjects and they don’t match their brother John’s right to honor our ancestors based on the primary What we found with DNA testing created a lot descendants.
    [Show full text]