DOCSLIB.ORG

An International Journal for Students of Theological and Religious Studies Volume 34 Issue 1 April 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An International Journal for Students of Theological and Religious Studies Volume 34 Issue 1 April 2009 An International Journal for Students of Theological and Religious Studies Volume 34 Issue 1 April 2009 EDITORIAL 1 D. A. Carson MINORITY REPORT: A Lesson from Peter the Barber 3 Carl Trueman The Embattled Bible: Four More Books 6 Robert W. Yarbrough How Far Beyond Chicago? Assessing Recent 26 Attempts to Reframe the Inerrancy Debate Jason S. Sexton Divine Retribution: A Forgotten Doctrine? 50 Andrew Atherstone Calvinism and Missions: 63 The Contested Relationship Revisited Kenneth J. Stewart PASTORAL PENSÉES: 79 Power in Preaching: Decide (1 Corinthians 2:1–5), Part 1 of 3 Raymond C. Ortlund Jr. Book Reviews 89 DESCRIPTION Themelios is an international evangelical theological journal that expounds and defends the historic Christian faith. Its primary audience is theological students and pastors, though scholars read it as well. It was formerly a print journal operated by RTSF/UCCF in the UK, and it became a digital journal operated by The Gospel Coalition in 2008. The new editorial team seeks to preserve representation, in both essayists and reviewers, from both sides of the Atlantic. Themelios is published three times a year exclusively online at www.theGospelCoalition.org. It is presented in two formats: PDF (for citing pagination) and HTML (for greater accessibility, usability, and infiltration in search engines). Themelios is copyrighted by The Gospel Coalition. Readers are free to use it and circulate it in digital form without further permission (any print use requires further written permission), but they must acknowledge the source and, of course, not change the content. EDITORS BOOK ReVIEW EDITORS General Editor: D. A. Carson Old Testament Systematic Theology and Bioethics Trinity Evangelical Divinity School Rodrigo de Sousa Hans Madueme 2065 Half Day Road Mackenzie University Trinity Evangelical Divinity School Deerfield, IL, 60015, USA Rua da Consolação, 896 - Prédio 23 2065 Half Day Road; D-632 [email protected] São Paulo, SP - Brazil Deerfield, IL 60015, USA [email protected] [email protected] Consulting Editor: Carl R. Trueman Westminster Theological Seminary New Testament Ethics (but not Bioethics) and Pastoralia Chestnut Hill, P.O. Box 27009 Alistair I. Wilson Dominic Smart Philadelphia, PA 19118, USA Dumisani Theological Institute Gilcomston South Church PO Box 681 Union Street Managing Editor: Charles Anderson King William’s Town 5600 Aberdeen Oak Hill Theological College South Africa AB10 1TP, UK Chase Side, Southgate, London [email protected] [email protected] N14, 4PS, UK [email protected] History and Historical Theology Shawn Wright Mission and Culture Administrator: Andrew David Naselli Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Daniel Strange Trinity Evangelical Divinity School 2825 Lexington Road Oak Hill College 2065 Half Day Road Louisville, KY 40299, USA Chase Side, Southgate Deerfield, IL, 60015, USA [email protected] London N14 4PS [email protected] [email protected] EDITORIal BOARD Gerald Bray, Beeson Divinity School; Beth Currier, University of Wisconsin-Madison; William Kynes, Cornerstone Evangelical Free Church; Ken Magnuson, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary; Jonathan Pennington, The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary; Michael Thate, Durham University; Mark D. Thompson, Moore Theological College; Garry Williams, Oak Hill Theological College;P aul Williamson, Moore Theological College; Stephen Witmer, Pepperell Christian Fellowship. ARTIcleS Articles should generally be about 4,000 to 7,000 words and should be submitted to the Managing Editor of Themelios,which is peer-reviewed. Articles should use clear, concise English, following The SBL Handbook of Style (esp. for abbreviations), supplemented by The Chicago Manual of Style. They should consistently use either UK or USA spelling and punctuation, and they should be submitted electronically as an email attachment using Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx extensions) or Rich Text Format (.rtf extension). Special characters should use a Unicode font. ReVIEWS The book review editors generally select individuals for book reviews, but potential reviewers may contact them about reviewing specific books. As part of arranging book reviews, the book review editors will supply book review guidelines to reviewers. Themelios 34.1 (2009): 1-2 EDITORIal — D. A. Carson — D. A. Carson is research professor of New Testament at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in Deerfield, Illinois. n blogs, journal essays, and books, there has been quite a lot written recently about what “the gospel” is. In the hands of some, the question of what “the gospel” is may be tied to the question of what “evangelicalism” is, since “gospel” = εὐαγγέλιον = evangel, which lies at the heart of evangelicalism. People talk variously of the “simple” gospel or the “robust” gospel or the “pure” I gospel—and doubtless a rich array of other adjectives. Some make a distinction between the gospel of the cross and the gospel of the kingdom. Technical New Testament studies in recent years have addressed the question of when “The Gospel According to Matthew [or Mark or Luke or John]” became “The Gospel of Matthew [or Mark or Luke or John],” for the former presupposes that there was one gospel with assorted witnesses, while the latter opens the possibility of having a distinct gospel for each community labeled by one of the four canonical gospels—though this latter view, still dominant, has come under severe criticism, not least in the light of Richard Bauckham’s edited volume The Gospels for All Christians: Rethinking Gospel Audiences (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998). Ironically, while Bauckham’s title nicely captures something true and important—viz., that our four canonical Gospels were not written for hermetically sealed off communities but for the widest circulation among Christians—it uses the plural form of the noun, “Gospels,” in a way which, as far as I know, is frankly anachronistic, for it does not seem to be duplicated anywhere else in the first century. A handful of other essays have noted the instance where the gospel is not “good news” for certain people, but a promise of terrifying judgment. The writers of these essays argue that εὐαγγέλιον may not mean “good news” but something like “great and important news”: whether it is good or bad depends on those who hear it. A couple of these questions I hope to address shortly elsewhere. For the moment, however, I’d like to underscore another distinction that is still worth making. It was understood better in the past than it is today. It is this: one must distinguish between, on the one hand, the gospel as what God has done and what is the message to be announced and, on the other, what is demanded by God or effected by the gospel in assorted human responses. If the gospel is the (good) news about what God has done in Christ Jesus, there is ample place for including under “the gospel” the ways in which the kingdom has dawned and is coming, for tying this kingdom to Jesus’ death and resurrection, for demonstrating that the purpose of what God has done is to reconcile sinners to himself and finally to bring under one head a renovated and transformed new heaven and new earth, for talking about God’s gift of the Holy Spirit, consequent upon Christ’s resurrection and ascension to the right hand of the Majesty on high, and above all for focusing attention on what Paul (and others—though the language I’m using here reflects Paul) sees as the matter “of first importance”: Christ crucified. All of this is what God has done; it is what we proclaim; it is the news, the great news, the good news. By contrast, the first two greatest commands—to love God with heart and soul and mind and strength, and our neighbor as ourselves—do not constitute the gospel, or any part of it. We may well 1 Editorial argue that when the gospel is faithfully declared and rightly received, it will result in human beings more closely aligned to these two commands. But they are not the gospel. Similarly, the gospel is not receiving Christ or believing in him, or being converted, or joining a church; it is not the practice of discipleship. Once again, the gospel faithfully declared and rightly received will result in people receiving Christ, believing in Christ, being converted, and joining a local church; but such steps are not the gospel. The Bible can exhort those who trust the living God to be concerned with issues of social justice (Isa 2; Amos); it can tell new covenant believers to do good to all human beings, especially to those of the household of faith (Gal 6); it exhorts us to remember the poor and to ask, not “Who is my neighbor?” but “Whom am I serving as neighbor?” We may even argue that some such list of moral commitments is a necessary consequence of the gospel. But it is not the gospel. We may preach through the list, reminding people that the Bible is concerned to tell us not only what to believe but how to live. But we may not preach through that list and claim it encapsulates the gospel. The gospel is whatGod has done, supremely in Christ, and especially focused on his cross and resurrection. Failure to distinguish between the gospel and all the effects of the gospel tends, on the long haul, to replace the good news as to what God has done with a moralism that is finally without the power and the glory of Christ crucified, resurrected, ascended, and reigning. 2 Themelios 34.1 (2009): 3-5 MINORITY RePORT A Lesson From Peter the Barber — Carl Trueman — Carl Trueman is Academic Dean, Vice President of Academic Affairs, and Professor of Historical Theology and Church History at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. o doubt my two children would cringe at the title of this short piece.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pat-Abendroth-Dissertation.Pdf
    A Pastoral Note About My Doctoral Project I am glad you are interested in reading my dissertation. Given that it took a fair amount of effort and my passion for the subject matter, I am happy to share it with church members and friends. Please allow me to introduce you to the project by saying just a few things. If you ask someone what Covenant Theology is and if it is a good or bad thing, you will likely hear lots of different answers. It is fairly common for evangelicals to respond by either saying they do not know what Covenant Theology is or by describing it as something unbiblical and relating to a particular view regarding millennialism, baptism, or Israel. There are three major problems with such responses. First, classic Covenant Theology is essentially concerned with matters of sin and salvation, not something else. Second, the biblical support for such things as the federal headship of Adam and Jesus is strong (federal being from the Latin foedus meaning covenant). Third, when Covenant Theology is rejected, justification by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone is at best in serious jeopardy. My dissertation is a promotion and defense of classic Covenant Theology. I have written out of a pastoral passion to help people understand human history federally/covenantally just as the Apostle Paul did as he wrote inspired Scripture (see Romans 5:12-21). Likewise, I have written in order to demonstrate the vital connection between Covenant Theology and justification by faith alone, the doctrine that is so commonly compromised by rejecters of the federal perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Mentoring Westminster Today
    Westminster Today WINTER 2010 | vol 2 . I s s 1 f o r m i n g . t e a c h i n g . e n g a g i n g mentoring Servant Leaders in this issue Desert Bloom | page 6 China Log | page 14 Mentoring servant Leaders Forming Specialists in the Bible ithout fear of contradiction, Jesus is the greatest educator in history. his Great Commission declares, “Go and make disciples (learners) of all nations” (Matthew 28:19). the School of Christ is worldwide and eternal in character. People from every kindred, tribe, tongue and nation are included (rev. 5:9). in the ages to come, we will still be learning of his grace (eph. 2:6-7)! in obedience to Christ’s Great Commission, Westminster theological Seminary operates as a school of higher learning to train pastors, teachers and Wleaders for the Kingdom of Christ by Declaring the Whole Counsel of God. in the spirit of Christ’s gospel imperative, we seek to make lifelong learners of the unsearchable riches of God in Christ as revealed in the historic-redemptive self- disclosure of God in the Scriptures. We have been doing that now for 80 years. our living graduates and alumni, numbering well over 6,000, are serving in over 60 countries around the globe. these have been consistently identified with what Westminster has cherished—high scholarship and depth of orthodox theology, which seeks to reflect Christ’s love and gospel service. Will you come and join our community of servant leaders and specialists in the Bible? When you do, you will join our worldwide alumni who cherish and joyfully pursue the greatest commission ever given among men—to make learners of the saving and eternal gospel of Jesus Christ, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Theology and Contemporary Legal Theory: a Tale of Ideological Collapse John Warwick Montgomery
    Liberty University Law Review Volume 2 | Issue 3 Article 10 2008 Modern Theology and Contemporary Legal Theory: A Tale of Ideological Collapse John Warwick Montgomery Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review Recommended Citation Montgomery, John Warwick (2008) "Modern Theology and Contemporary Legal Theory: A Tale of Ideological Collapse," Liberty University Law Review: Vol. 2: Iss. 3, Article 10. Available at: http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lu_law_review/vol2/iss3/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Liberty University School of Law at DigitalCommons@Liberty University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Liberty University Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Liberty University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MODERN THEOLOGY AND CONTEMPORARY LEGAL THEORY: A TALE OF IDEOLOGICAL COLLAPSE t John Warwick Montgomery Abstract This paper bridges an intellectual chasm often regarded as impassable, that between modern jurisprudence (philosophy of law) and contemporary theology. Ourthesis is that remarkablysimilar developmental patterns exist in these two areas of the history of ideas and that lessons learned in the one are of the greatestpotential value to the other. It will be shown that the fivefold movement in the history of modern theology (classical liberalism, neo- orthodoxy, Bultmannianexistentialism, Tillichianontology, andsecular/death- of-God viewpoints) has been remarkably paralled in legal theory (realism/positivism,the jurisprudence ofH.L.A. Hart,the philosophyofRonald Dworkin, the neo-Kantian political theorists, and Critical Legal Studies' deconstructionism). From this comparative analysis the theologian and the legal theorist can learn vitally important lessons for their own professional endeavors.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter One Recent Developments in the Doctrine of Scripture D
    CHAPTER ONE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DOCTRINE OF SCRIPTURE D. A. Carson .......tr ___________ ~ CHAPTER ONE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE DOCTRINE OF SCRIPTURE The pattern of Christian thought that emerged from the Reforma­ tion is often summed up under the three phrases: sola gratia, sola fides, and sola Scriptura. When I was a boy! I sometimes wondered how logic could be preseIVed if there were three statements each claiming that something or other was "sola"; but in due course I learned that grace is the sole ground of salvation! faith is the sole means of salvation! and the Scriptures are the sole ultimate authority for faith and life-all set in the context of the polemics of the Reformation period. Precisely because the Reformers' theological formulations were shaped by the controversies of their age! it is clear that the "faith and life" formula was meant to be an all-embracing rubric! not a limiting one. They claimed that the deposit of truth lies in the Bible! not in the church or in the magisterium of the church. Their concern! in other words! was to spell out the locus of authority in order to rebut their Roman Catholic opponents! not to restrict the range of the Bible's authority to religious life and thought! away from history and the natural world.l The modern disjunction would have seemed strange to them. This side of the EnlightenmenC debate over the Scriptures soon moved on to broader matters. Although the history of these debates has been chronicled many times!2 a great deal of detailed work still needs to be done.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Strange Clark H. Pinnock: the Evolution of an Evangelical Maverick
    EQ 71:4 (1999), 311-326 Daniel Strange Clark H. Pinnock: The Evolution of an Evangelical Maverick The theological debate awakened by the work ofDr Clark Pinnock has figured more than once in the EVANGEUCAL QUARTERLY in recent years. The submission oftwo arti­ cles on the topic, the one dealing with the general development ofPinnock ~ theology and the other with the specific question ofexclusivism and inclusivism, suggested that it might be worthwhile to publish them together and also give the subject the opportunity to comment on them. The author of our first article is doing doctoral research on the problem of the unevangelised in recent evangelical theology in the University ofBristol. Key words: Theology; religion; inclusivism; Pinnock. ! Some theologians are idealogues, so cocksure about the truth that they are willing to force reality to fit into their own system; others are not so sure and permit reality to ch~nge them and their systems instead. I am a theologian 1 of the latter type. ! ' In this paper I wish t~; give a biographical study of the Canadian Baptist theologi~, Clark H.iPinnock, giving a flavour of his pi~grimage in the­ ology WhICh has spar;ned five decades. In understanding the current work of a particular sC,holar, it is always helpful to understand the con­ text within which he or she works, the theological background from which they have come, and the influences that have shaped their thought. From this it may even be possible to predict where they will go next in their theological journey. Within the Evangelical community, especially in North America, Clark Pinnock is one of the most stimulating, controversial and influ­ ential theologians, and a study of his work raises important questions about the nature and identity of contemporary Evangelicalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery, Human Dignity and Human Rights John Warwick Montgomery'
    EQ 79.2 (2007), 113-131 Slavery, human dignity and human rights John Warwick Montgomery' John Warwick Montgomery is a barn"ster who is Emeritus Professor of Law and Humanities at the University of Bedfordshire. He is also an ordained Lutheran and Director of the International Academy of Apologetics, Evangelism and Human Rights, Strasbourg. KEY WORDS: SLavery, abolition movement, human rights, natural law, Neo-Kantianism, Enlightenment Ronald Oworkin, abortion, right-ta-life. I. The paradox When, a quarter century ago, I taught at the International School of Law, Wash­ ington, D.C" we lived in Falls Church, Virginia. I could always get a laugh at Com­ monwealth parties (Virginia must be so designated - never as a mere 'State') by observing that I was having great difficulty finding slaves to proofread my book manuscripts. In today's climate of political correctness. such attempts at humour would be regarded as offensive at best. obnoxious at worst. In the modern world, everyone, everywhere condemns slavery. The formal opposition to it is as powerful as is the universal acclaim for human rights (which are lauded both by doctrinaire liberals and by the worst of dictators). Indeed. the international legal instruments could not be more specific - from the Slavery Convention of the League of Nations. which entered into force 9 March 1927. through Article 4 of both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention of Human Rights. to the Supplementary Convention on the Abolition of Slavery. the Slave Trade. and Institutions and Practices Similar to Slavery, adopted in 1956 under UN sponsorship to reinforce and augment the 1927 Slavery Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    1 CURRICULUM VITAE NAME: Dale C. Allison, Jr. BIRTH: November 25, 1955, Wichita, Kansas HOME ADDRESS: 26 Library Place Princeton, N.J. 08542 OFFICE: Princeton Theological Seminary P.O. Box 821 Princeton, N.J. 08542 TELEPHONE: 609 924 1320 (home) 412 867 1343 (cell) 609 497 7976 (office) E-MAIL: [email protected] BOOKS 4 Baruch (Paraleipomena Jeremiou), Commentaries on Early Jewish Literature (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2018). Night Comes: Death, Imagination, and the Last Things (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2016). A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle of James, International Critical Commentary (London/New York: Bloomsberry T. & T. Clark International, 2013), pp. xlix + 790. Editor, with (for various volumes) Christine Helmer, Volker Leppin, Bernard McGinn, Steven L. McKenzie, Choon-Thomas Römer, Leong Seow, Hermann Spieckermann, Barry Dov Walfish, and Eric Ziolkowski, Encyclopedia of the Bible and Its Reception, vols. 5-12 (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012-2016). Constructing Jesus: Memory, Imagination, and History (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2010; British edition by SPCK), pp. xxix + 588; paperback edition, 2013; selected as "Best Book Relating to the New Testament" for 2009-2010 by the Biblical Archaeology Society. The Historical Christ and the Theological Jesus (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2009), pp. x + 126; translated into Italian as Cristo storico e Gesè teologico (Studi biblici 169; Brescia: Paideia Editrice, 2012). The Love There That's Sleeping: The Art and Spirituality of George Harrison (London/New York: Continuum, 2006); pp. viii + 168. 2 The Luminous Dusk (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2006); pp. x + 178; revised and enlarged edition of The Silence of Angels (Valley Forge: Trinity Press International, 1995).
    [Show full text]
  • Defending the Gospel in Legal Style Legal in Gospel the Defending John Warwick Montgomery Warwick John
    Defending the Gospel in Legal Style Montgomery John Warwick Traditional apologetics is either focused on obscure, quasi-Thomist philosophi- cal arguments for God’s existence or on 18th-century-style answers to alleged biblical contradictions. But a new approach has recently entered the picture: the juridical defence of historic Christian faith, with its particular concern for demons- trating Jesus’s deity and saving work for mankind. The undisputed leader of this movement is John Warwick Montgomery, emeritus professor of law and humani- ties, University of Bedfordshire, England, and director, International Academy of Apologetics, Evangelism and Human Rights, Strasbourg, France. His latest book (of more than sixty published during his career) shows the strength of legal apo- logetics: its arguments, drawn from secular legal reasoning, can be rejected only at the cost of jettisoning the legal system itself, on which every civilised society depends for its very existence. The present work also includes theological essays on vital topics of the day, characterised by the author’s well-known humour and skill for lucid communication. John Warwick Montgomery is the leading advoca- te of a legal apologetic for historic Christian faith. He is trained as a historian (Ph.D., University of Chicago), an English barrister, French avocat, and American lawyer (LL.D., Cardiff University, Wales, U.K.), and theologian (D.Théol., Faculty of Protes- tant Theology, University of Strasbourg, France). He has debated major representatives of secula- rism (atheist Madalyn Murray O’Hair, death-of-God advocate Thomas Altizer, liberal theologian Bishop James Pike, atheistic cosmologist Sean M. Carroll, et al.). He is the author or editor of more than 60 books and 150 journal articles, and has appeared on innumerable international television and radio broadcasts.
    [Show full text]
  • LUTHER Historical Significance Can Hardly Be Overstated
    FOREWORD BY ROBERT KOLB LUTHER historical significance can hardly be overstated. CARL R. TRUEMAN MartinKnown as the Luther’s father of the Protestant Reformation, Luther has had an enormous impact on Western Christianity and culture. In Luther on the Christian Life, AFTERWORD BY MARTIN E. MARTY historian Carl Trueman introduces readers to the lively Reformer, taking them on a tour of his historical context, theological system, and approach to the Christian life. on the Christian Life Whether exploring Luther’s theology of protest, ever-present sense of humor, or misunderstood view of sanctification, this book will help modern readers go deeper in their spiritual walk by learning from one of the great teachers of the faith. “This book illustrates again why Martin Luther remains a nearly inexhaustible resource. Trueman explains why Luther can be such a perceptive, encouraging, human, and even humorous guide to the Christian life.” MARK A. NOLL, Francis A. McAnaney Professor of History, University of Notre Dame “Carl Trueman has pulled off a tremendous feat: he’s not only given us a volume that is scholarly and historically nuanced while still accessible and refreshingly contemporary; he’s also managed to capture the brilliance and boldness of Martin Luther in a relatively short space.” KEVIN DEYOUNG, Senior Pastor, University Reformed Church, East Lansing, Michigan “If you think you know Luther, read this book. It is a remarkably edifying and illuminating piece of work. Displaying the interests of a pastor and the rigor of a historian, Trueman provides us with an analysis of Luther on the Christian life that is as ‘human’ as the German Reformer himself.” MICHAEL HORTON, J.
    [Show full text]
  • By Augusto Del Noce ______By Carl Trueman
    what is man? Ordained Servant November 2017 Ordained Servant Online A Journal for Church Officers E-ISSN 1931-7115 CURRENT ISSUE: WHAT IS MAN? November 2017 From the Editor The doctrine of man is central to the modern debate about sexual identity. The rejection of transcendent reality by the modern mind sets people free to seek to redefine the human. In my editorial essay, “Diminishing Humanity: How the Modern World Is Dehumanizing Us,” I explore the theme of dehumanization in modernity. Carl Trueman reviews the work of a relatively unknown twentieth-century Italian political and cultural philosopher in his review of Augusto Del Noce, The Crisis of Modernity. His exploration of the disenchantment of modern life in terms of an assumed materialism is profound. The human quest for rest without God leads to the exhaustion of hope. God has designed it that way, so that we may not find rest outside of resting in him. The Sabbath trajectory of human life is meant to drive us to our Creator, in whom true rest may only be found. I explore this theme in George Herbert’s poem “The Pulley.” John Muether continues the celebration of Reformation 500 as he explores the confessional development of the Reformation with “Reformed Confessions: Canons of the Synod of Dort (1619).” This demonstrates the doctrinal consistency of biblically based ecclesiastical symbols forged in the ecumenical spirit of a truly ecumenical endeavor. In another area of historical exploration, Danny Olinger gives us chapter 10 of his Vos biography, “Geerhardus Vos: Grace and Glory,” in which he explores the sermonic production of Vos.
    [Show full text]
  • PASTOR's PEN Our 2018 Teaching
    PASTOR’S PEN Our 2018 Teaching Weekend with the Rev. Dr. Carl Trueman— “The Reformation: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow” It’s with great joy that we announce our 2018 Teaching Weekend set for February 9-11. This annual event, now ten years strong, will again be co-sponsored by our congregation and our sisters and brothers of Grace Church, Roanoke. We are committed through these Teaching Weekends to bring strong biblical teaching and scholarship as a blessing to the wider community. This year we are particularly thrilled that the Rev. Dr. Carl Trueman will be our visiting scholar and teacher. He will be addressing the topic, “The Reformation: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow.” Given the 500th celebration of the Reformation in October, it will be a blessing to continue to draw upon that history for the Church today. Dr. Trueman is one of the most respected orthodox theologians in the Church. Having his PhD from the University of Aberdeen, Scotland, he holds the Paul Woolley Chair of Church History at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia. He also serves as the pastor of Cornerstone Presbyterian Church, a congregation of the Orthodox Presbyterian Church. He has written more than a dozen books and is currently working on the Oxford Handbook of Calvin and Calvinism due early next year. Dr. Trueman’s academic interests focus primarily on Reformation church history and especially on the life and work of Martin Luther. Dr. Trueman’s 2015 biography of Luther—Luther on the Christian Life: Cross and Freedom—was met with rave reviews and appreciations. He is also a frequent contributor to “First Things” magazine.
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry Council Periodic External Review Report
    Ministry Council Periodic External Review Report Oak Hill College April 2016 Ministry Division Church House Great Smith Street London SW1P 3AZ Tel: 020 7898 1412 Fax: 020 7898 1421 Published 2016 by the Ministry Division of the Archbishops’ Council Copyright © The Archbishops’ Council 2016 CONTENTS GLOSSARY ....................................................................................................................................1 LIST OF REVIEWERS ..................................................................................................................2 THE PERIODIC EXTERNAL REVIEW FRAMEWORK ...........................................................3 SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................4 FULL REPORT INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................9 SECTION ONE: AIMS AND KEY RELATIONS ..................................................................... 12 A Aims and objectives .................................................................................................... 12 B Relationships with other institutions ......................................................................... 17 SECTION TWO: CURRICULUM FOR FORMATION AND EDUCATION ......................... 20 C Curriculum for formation and education.............................................................. 20 SECTION THREE: MINISTERIAL DEVELOPMENT ...........................................................
    [Show full text]