DOCSLIB.ORG

Supporting Organizations — Reporting Requirements New Market Tax Credit Deals SCHEDULE a REPORTING: SECTION 509( A)(3) SUPPORTI NG ORGANIZATIONS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supporting Organizations — Reporting Requirements New Market Tax Credit Deals SCHEDULE a REPORTING: SECTION 509( A)(3) SUPPORTI NG ORGANIZATIONS July/August 2017 Conversions From Nonprofit to For-Profit Supporting Organizations — Reporting Requirements New Market Tax Credit Deals SCHEDULE A REPORTING: SECTION 509( a)(3) SUPPORTI NG ORGANIZATIONS JOHN V. WOODHULL AND JANICE M. SMITH Supporting organizations historically have been charity status. In most instances, charitable organiza - Because of expanded viewed as operating within a very complex area of the tions simply checked the same box in Part I (“Reason reporting requirements, tax law. The complexity arguably rose to a new level, for Public Charity Status”) that they had checked in supporting organization managers and tax however, with the 2014 introduction of an expanded the previous year or years, and moved on to the next practitioners have been Schedule A of Form 990—the form required for re - (and seemingly more important) schedules in Form forced to possess a porting public charity status and public support. Be - 990. Public charity status seemingly had been rele - deeper understanding cause of the expanded reporting requirements, gated to one of the less important issues for tax exempt of supporting supporting organization managers and tax practi - organizations to consider. If any effort was expended, organization tax law than required in the past. tioners have been forced to possess a deeper under - it was focused primarily on Parts II and III of Sched - standing of supporting organization tax law than ule A (the support schedules) that numerically veri - required in the past. fied a charitable organization’s public charity status If there is one area of tax law in which compliance under Section 509(a)(1)/Section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and can be amorphous, escaping even the most meticu - Section 509(a)(2). lous organizational and tax accounting profession - Schedule A previously had been revised in 2008 als, it is the area of supporting organizations. 1 Not when the entire Form 990 was redesigned and ex - only are the tax rules complex, but, as discussed panded to 16 schedules. The primary changes that below, expanded tax reporting under the rules affects were introduced to Schedule A at that time related situations that were not even intended to be affected, to the public support schedules, which were ex - thus forcing strained interpretations of the regulatory panded from a four-year rolling average to a five- requirements. year rolling average. Prior to 2008, organizations applying for recognition of charitable exemption on Form 1023, “Application for Recognition of Exemp - The previous Schedule A tion Under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Rev - Until the 2014 Form 990 series was released, Sched - enue Code,” were permitted to elect an “advance ule A of Form 990 was not much more than a pro ruling” that required the organization to submit forma checklist for charitable organizations’ public public support information on a separate schedule at the end of the five-year advance ruling period to JOHN V. WOODHULL is a tax managing director in the Chicago of - fice of Crowe Horwath LLP. JANICE M. SMITH is a tax senior man - confirm their public charity status under Section ager in the firm’s Washington, DC, office. 509(a)(1)/Section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). However, al - JULY/AUGUST 2017 taxation of exempts 17 though Question 6a in Part X (“Request for Advance threshold (as the case may be) in Part IV-A of Sched - Ruling”) remains in Form 1023, instructions on the ule A could continue to file as publicly supported or - form itself indicate that the advance ruling election ganizations, albeit incorrectly, unless either the IRS is no longer available. This is another example of the audited the organization and directed it to begin fil - difficulty the IRS has had in trying to update its pub - ing a Form 990-PF or the organization itself stopped lications and regulations to reflect the statutory filing the Form 990. There was no automatic default changes enacted by Congress. to private foundation status in Part IV-A of the pre- At present, once an initial determination has been 2008 Form 990. made by the IRS regarding a charitable organization’s public charity status based on the financial informa - tion submitted with Form 1023, Schedule A is the The winds of change hit the only schedule that charitable organizations may use regulations ... and Schedule A to demonstrate that they are maintaining their pub - Notwithstanding the changes to Parts II and III of lic charity status under Section 509(a)(1)/Section Schedule A, Schedule A reporting issues did not re - 170(b)(1)(A)(vi). If, at the end of five years, a chari - ally come into focus until the Section 509(a)(3) reg - table organization does not meet the one-third test ulations were finalized in 2012 and Parts IV, V, and or the 10% facts-and-circumstances test—the math - VI were added to Schedule A beginning with the ematical tests that demonstrate that an organization 2014 tax year. 2 Prior to 2006 and the changes en - acted to Section 509(a)(3), Section 509(a)(3) often was used as a default public charity status, available Expanded tax reporting affects situations for charitable organizations that were unable to ef - that were not even intended to be affected. fectively solicit charitable contributions or charge admissions for exempt activities and satisfy the pub - receives the requisite amount of public support to lic support tests of Sections 509(a)(1)/Section maintain its public charity classification—the Sched - 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and Section 509(a)(2). Although ule automatically defaults the organization into pri - the relationship tests are the most difficult part of the vate foundation status. 509(a)(3) regulations to satisfy, many charitable or - Prior to the 2008 tax year (and the changes to the ganizations choose to be classified as supporting or - Form 990), Part IV-A of Schedule A required Section ganizations, with only a limited understanding of the 509(a)(1)/Section 170(b)(1)(A)(vi) and Section restrictions that Section 509(a)(3) impose on their 509(a)(2) organizations to demonstrate their ability abilities to act independently. to satisfy the respective public support tests in much the same manner as Parts II and III of today’s Sched - ule A. The big difference with the revised Schedule A The ‘new’ Schedule A— is at the bottom of the respective Parts (lines 18 and Expanded reporting for 20, respectively). The revised Schedule A automati - supporting organizations cally defaults organizations that fail the mathematical As most supporting organizations discovered upon public support tests to private foundation status. completing their 2014 Form 990, the number and Prior to 2008, organizations that failed the public complexity of the questions in the expanded Sched - support test and fell below the 10% or one-third ule A can be confusing and overwhelming. The ex - 1 Supporting organizations are described in Section 509(a)(3). It de - organizations into the statute.” Specifically, Type I supporting organ - fines them as an organization that is organized, and at all times op - izations are “operated, supervised, or controlled by” one or more Sec - erated, exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to tion 509(a)(1) or 509(a)(2) organizations; Type II supporting carry out the purposes of one or more publicly supported organiza - organizations are “supervised or controlled in connection with” one tions (specifically, organizations described in Section 509(a)(1) or Sec - or more Section 509(a)(1) or 509(a)(2) organizations; and Type III tion 509(a)(2)). A supporting organization is either “operated, supporting organizations are “operated in connection with” a Sec - supervised or controlled by,” “supervised or controlled in connection tion 509(a)(1) or (2) organization. 4 with,” or “operated in connection with” one or more publicly sup - In considering the supporting organization regulations, a district ported organizations. Supporting organizations must not be con - court judge commented that “the Internal Revenue Service has trolled directly or indirectly by disqualified persons. drafted fantastically intricate and detailed regulations to thwart the 2 Even though Form 990, Schedule A, has been updated to conform fantastically intricate and detailed efforts of taxpayers to obtain pri - to the new supporting organization requirements, Form 1023, Sched - vate benefits from foundations while avoiding the imposition of ule D, has not been similarly updated. Thus, Form 1023 supporting taxes.” Windsor Foundation, 40 AFTR2d 77-6004 at 77-6005 (ED organization filers should include documentation (such as a narrative Va., 1977). 5 explanation) to demonstrate that the applicable supporting organ - See, for example, Mitchell et al, “Supporting Organizations in the ization tests will be met. Spotlight,” 27 Exempts 3, page 3 (Nov/Dec, 2015). 3 6 P.L. 109-208, 120 Stat. 780, 3/23/06. According to IRS Notice 2006- Throughout this article, the term “publicly supported organizations” 109, 2006-51 IRB 1121: “The PPA incorporates the previously infor - refers to organizations that receive broad public support and are clas - mal nomenclature used to distinguish among types of supporting sified as Section 509(a)(1) or Section 509(a)(2) organizations. 18 taxation of exempts JULY/AUGUST 2017 SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS panded tax reporting requirements necessitate were not finalized until the end of 2012 and were fi - much closer analysis than before. Specifically, Sched - nally incorporated into the instructions and Sched - ule A of Form 990 was substantially revised in 2014 ule A in 2014. to address the new reporting requirements of the final regulations governing supporting organiza - tions under Section 509(a)(3). Prior to 2014, Section Overview of supporting 509(a)(3) supporting organizations had to provide organization classifications only a minimum amount of information on Sched - The supporting organization statutes and regulations ule A, none of which had to be verified or cross ref - are very complex.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Audit Technique Guide – Fundraising Activities
    Audit Technique Guide – Fundraising Activities Introduction This guide addresses examining tax exempt organization fundraising and provides: Background information Audit guidelines Audit techniques Audit procedures This guide is not all-inclusive and doesn’t intend to limit agents to identifying issues or using techniques not listed in this guide. For information on fundraising issues involving political organizations, see the Audit Technique Guide for Political Organizations. For information on fundraising issues involving gaming activities, see the Audit Technique Guide for Organizations Conducting Gaming Activities. This manual is organized into five sections: Background information Activities (professional fundraisers, fundraising events, internet fundraising) Records (solicitations, disclosures, cash contributions, non-cash contributions) Reporting (Form 990-EZ, Form 990: Core Return, Schedule G, Schedule M, Form 990-PF, Form 990-T) Audit procedures (pre-audit, field/OCEP, penalty considerations, case closing) Background Most, if not all, tax exempt organizations need money. Many exempt purposes can only be achieved via the application of money. Thus, large numbers of organizations devote significant resources to acquiring money. These organizations use various methods to obtain funds, ranging from selling a product or service, conducting a fundraising event, to just asking for money. Traditional methods of obtaining funds include soliciting donors via the mail, phone calls, newspapers, radio, television, and now via the Internet. Organizations have become creative over the years, conducting activities and events, such as the sales of foodstuffs, car washes, raffles, casino nights, auctions, and pledge drives, evolving towards more sophisticated ways to fundraise, such as targeting solicitations, using patronage levels, crowd-funding, and tax planning, such as conservation easements, lending arrangements, and charitable gift annuities.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteering Policy
    My Volunteering Policy The purpose of this policy is to outline the opportunities and procedures for Thomson Reuters employees to engage in community volunteering activities. By allowing all regular employees time off to volunteer, Thomson Reuters can continue to invest in its local communities, and have a meaningful impact on the world around us one community at a time. Thomson Reuters encourages employees from across the business to take part in volunteering activities with recognized charities and community organizations including accredited schools. To enable this we offer all regular full-time and part-time employees* time off with pay for at least 2 days or 16 hours per calendar year (pro-rated for part-time staff). *Part-time employees are eligible if their regularly scheduled hours are 20 or more per week. Multiply the number of hours worked in a day by two; the result is the annual number of hours eligible for paid time off to volunteer (4 hours a day x 2 = 8 hours a year). GUIDELINES FOR VOLUNTEERING Volunteering during working hours is at your manager’s discretion and subject to the needs of the business. You should obtain your manager’s approval to use paid time off to volunteer and then log your paid volunteer hours into My Community. For full details of how to apply for volunteering, read our My Volunteer FAQ in My Community. RECOGNIZED CHARITIES AND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS Through this policy and our programs we support organizations that are registered as a charity not-for-profit or tax exempt organizations and accredited schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving René Bekkers
    Eight Mechanisms That Drive Charitable Giving* René Bekkers and Pamala Wiepking An overwhelming body of knowledge is available on philanthropy in the social sciences. Research on philanthropy appears in journals from very different disciplines. We present an overview of research on determinants of charitable giving from all disciplines. Why Do People Give? Experiments in economics, sociology, social psychology, biology, and marketing have shown how situations can be created that encourage giving. The situations in these experiments are created by researchers, which allows for causal inferences about determinants of giving. From these experiments, conclusions can be drawn about why people give. We reviewed this literature and identify eight mechanisms as the key mechanisms that have been studied as determinants of philanthropy. They are (a) awareness of need; (b) solicitation; (c) costs and benefits; (d) altruism; (e) reputation; (f) psychological benefits; (g) values; (h) efficacy. Below we present the eight mechanisms that drive giving. The order in which the eight mechanisms are presented does not reflect the importance or causal strength of the mechanisms. Rather, the order corresponds to the chronological order in which they affect giving in the typical act of donation. For each mechanism, we present the main effect. In many cases, these main effects can be moderated (or sometimes mediated) by other factors. Moderating factors are factors that weaken or strengthen the effect of the mechanism: conditions or personal characteristics that interact with the main effect. Mechanism 1: Awareness of Need Awareness of need is a first prerequisite for philanthropy. People have to become aware of a need for support.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Qualifying Charitable Organizations for 2019
    LIST OF QUALIFYING CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS FOR 2019 ―Qualifying organizations for cash donations made between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2019― QCO Code Name of Organization Address URL* Phone # 20266 1st Way Pregnancy Center PO Box 5294, Phoenix, AZ 85016 URL (602) 261-7522 20135 4Freedom, Inc. dba Sold No More PO Box 68888, Oro Valley, AZ 85737 URL (520) 917-6528 20075 A New Leaf, Inc. 868 E University Drive, Mesa, AZ 85203 URL (480) 969-4024 20920 Abaka Developmental Preschool & Childcare Foundation 6620 W Shaw Butte Drive, Glendale, AZ 85304 URL (602) 677-2968 20732 Abide Maternity Home 499 2nd Street, Camp Verde, AZ 86322 URL (928) 202-9402 20090 Ability360 5025 E Washington Street, Suite 200, Phoenix, AZ 85034 URL (602) 256-2245 21983 Abounding Service 4573 W Dublin Street, Chandler, AZ 85226 URL (480) 229-8842 20643 About Care PO Box 3278, Tempe, AZ 85244 URL (480) 802-2331 20317 ACCEL - Arizona Centers for Comprehensive Education and Life Skills 10251 N 35th Avenue, Phoenix, AZ 85051 URL (602) 995-7366 22017 AccessMed Foundation (formerly Medicare Planning Solutions) 6930 E Chauncey Lane, Ste. 200, Phoenix, AZ 85054 URL (602) 375-2414 20795 ACHIEVE Human Services, Inc. 3250-A East 40th Street, Yuma, AZ 85365 URL (928) 341-0335 20475 Addicted Nation Solutions (formerly Women in New Recovery) 860 N Center Street, Mesa, AZ 85201 URL (480) 464-5764 22056 Addiction Haven 1164 W Macaw Drive, Chandler, AZ 85286 URL (480) 277-3408 20050 Adelante Healthcare 9520 W Palm Lane, Suite 200, Phoenix, AZ 85037 URL (623) 583-3001 20249 Administration of Resources and Choices 3003 S Country Club Road, Suite 219, Tucson, AZ 85713 URL (520) 623-9383 21023 Adopt a Vet Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 501 on the Ground That All of Its Profits Are Payable to One Or More Organizations Exempt from Taxation Under Section 501
    F. IRC 502 - FEEDER ORGANIZATIONS 1. Introduction An organization described in IRC 502 does not qualify for exemption under any paragraph of IRC 501(c). The purpose of this article is to discuss some of the basic issues presented by IRC 502, to explain how it should be interpreted and applied, and to consider the amount of unrelated business activity that an exempt charitable organization may engage in. IRC 502 provides that an organization operated for the primary purpose of carrying on a trade or business for profit shall not be exempt under IRC 501 on the ground that all of its profits are payable to one or more organizations exempt under IRC 501. 2. Purpose of Feeder Provisions A brief consideration of the reasons for the enactment of IRC 502 provides some insight as to how it should be interpreted. There was growing concern, particularly after World War II, about the increasing amount of business activities carried on by exempt organizations, particularly, charitable organizations. In a series of cases involving taxable years prior to 1951, certain organizations popularly called "feeder organizations" were held exempt from federal income tax under the predecessor to IRC 501(c)(3), even though their sole activity was engaging in commercial business, and the only basis for exemption was the fact their profits were payable to specified exempt organizations. See Roche's Beach, Inc. v. Commissioner, 96 F. 2d 776 (1938); C. F. Mueller Company v. Commissioner, 190 F. 2d 120 (1951). The courts held that the exclusive purpose required by the statute was met when the only object of the organization was religious, scientific, charitable, or educational, without regard to the method of obtaining funds necessary to effectuate the objective.
    [Show full text]
  • Piton Wealth Raises Over $5,000 at Benefit Concert with Singer-Songwriter James Lanman ______
    PITON WEALTH RAISES OVER $5,000 AT BENEFIT CONCERT WITH SINGER-SONGWRITER JAMES LANMAN _____________________________________________________________________ 16 July 2019 (KENNEWICK, WA) For two decades Michelle Clary and her team have operated in wealth management in the Tri-Cities, first as an affiliate practice of Fortune 500 company Thrivent Financial and as of 2018, the CEO and founder of Piton Wealth. It isn’t difficult to see how Clary and her team have consistently ranked in the upper 1% of Thrivent practices in client satisfaction. Taking an active role in the local community and bringing people together for a good cause seems to be second nature for a company that revolves so heavily around encouraging clients to thrive both personally and professionally. In 2017, Michelle and her husband Andy opened their home to singer-songwriter James Lanman who was on a living room concert tour across the US and Canada, where he performed for a mix of their clients and friends. The following year, Michelle had the idea to leverage the draw of live music, food from local eatery, Porter’s Real BBQ, and their expansive network by turning it into a fundraiser. Teaming up with Lanman to sell tickets to his performance at their home, Piton Wealth then matches all ticket sales from the concert to raise money for the Tri-County Habitat for Humanity branch, where Andy also serves on the board. They also have a tradition of a side contest where guests bring their A-game side dishes and judges select the top 3 winners. Now in its third year, what has affectionately become known as “Kennewoodstock” between Lanman and Clary, has become quite the event.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Understanding the Critical Section
    Understanding the Critical Section 509(a) Classification for Auxiliary Organizations Each auxiliary organization should have an IRS tax-exemption determination letter that the entity is an IRC §501(c)(3) – as a charitable organization -- and classifying it into one of the three (3) “public charity” subsets under Section §509(a).1 The §509(a) subset is where the Internal Revenue Code defines a “private foundation” by listing entities that are not private foundations. Under §509(a), an organization is presumed to be a private foundation unless it can prove that it is a public charity based upon its activities. The §509(a) subset classification typically is set when the organization applies for tax-exempt status. But reclassifications can occur with the filing of a change on the IRS Form 990, or as a result a perceived change in the role/function of the organization. Each §509(a) subset involves certain qualification “tests” and the subsets are not necessarily mutually exclusive – that is an organization might fit within any one of the three subsets. Section 509(a)(1) “publicly supported organizations” are the most common “public charities.” They typically include educational organizations, churches, hospitals, and public institutions, or organizations for the benefit of colleges and universities. The qualifying test for a 509(a)(1) organization is that it must receive a substantial part (receive at least one-third) of its support from a governmental unit or from the general public, and be organized and operated exclusively to receive, hold, invest, and administer property and make expenditures to or for the benefit of a governmental unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Charitable Gift Fund User's Guide
    CHARITABLE GIFT FUND USER’S GUIDE CHARITABLE GIFT FUND USER'S GUIDE Thank you for your interest in Anabaptist Foundation’s Charitable Gift Fund (CGF) Program. We have collected the most frequently asked questions about our Charitable Gift Fund in this User's Guide, and arranged them by topic. This information will help you understand how Charitable Gift Funds may and may not be used to support churches and charities. TABLE OF CONTENTS CGF OVERVIEW PURPOSE OF THE CHARITABLE GIFT FUND PROGRAM WHAT IS A CHARITABLE GIFT FUND? .......................................................................................... PAGE 1 WHY DO WE OFFER A CHARITABLE GIFT FUND PROGRAM? ............................................................. PAGE 1 ARE GIFTS TO CHARITIES AND CHURCHES SENT ANONYMOUSLY? ....................................................... PAGE 1 HOW DOES A CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ACCOUNT SIMPLIFY GIVING? ................................................... PAGE 1 A CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ACCOUNT MAKES A ONCE-IN-A-LIFETIME GIFT EASY TO ADMINISTRATE ........... PAGE 2 OPENING A CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ACCOUNT WHO MAY OPEN A CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ACCOUNT? .................................................................. PAGE 2 HOW DO I OPEN A CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ACCOUNT? .................................................................. PAGE 2 IS THERE A MINIMUM AMOUNT NEEDED TO OPEN A CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ACCOUNT? ....................... PAGE 2 HOW OFTEN MAY I MAKE DONATIONS TO MY CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ACCOUNT? ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Registered Charity Vs. Non-Profit Organization
    Fast Facts Registered Charity vs. Non-Profit Organization Registered charities are often referred to as non-profit organizations (NPOs). However, while both types of organizations operate on a non-profit basis, the two types are defined differently under theIncome Tax Act. Topics Registered Charity NPO Must be established and operate • Can operate for social welfare, civic exclusively for charitable purposes improvement, pleasure, sport, recreation, or any Purposes • relief of poverty other purpose except profit. • advancement of education • Cannot operate exclusively for charitable • advancement of religion purposes. • purposes beneficial to the community Must apply to the Canada Revenue No registration process for income tax Registration Agency (CRA) and be approved for purposes. registration as a charity. Charitable Is issued a charitable registration Is not issued a charitable registration number. Registration Number number upon approval by the CRA Can issue official donation receipts Cannot issue official donation receipts for Tax Receipts for income tax purposes. income tax purposes. Must spend a minimum amount on its Spending Requirement own charitable activities or as gifts Not applicable (Disbursement Quota) to qualified donees. Is designated by the CRA as a Designation charitable organization, a public Does not receive a designation. foundation or a private foundation. Must file annual information return May have to file a T2 return (if incorporated), Returns (Form T3010) within six months of its and/or an information return (Form T1044) fiscal period end. within six months of its fiscal period end. Personal Benefits to Cannot use its income to personally Cannot use its income to personally benefit its Members benefit its members.
    [Show full text]
  • Disentangling the Signaling Benefits of Altruistic Acts
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Fehrler, Sebastian; Przepiorka, Wojtek Working Paper Charitable giving as a signal of trustworthiness: Disentangling the signaling benefits of altruistic acts IZA Discussion Papers, No. 7148 Provided in Cooperation with: IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Suggested Citation: Fehrler, Sebastian; Przepiorka, Wojtek (2013) : Charitable giving as a signal of trustworthiness: Disentangling the signaling benefits of altruistic acts, IZA Discussion Papers, No. 7148, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/69483 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von
    [Show full text]
  • A More Charitable Charity: Administrative Necessity Provides an Opportunity to Promote Altruism in Charities
    University of Tennessee Law Legal Scholarship Repository: A Service of the Joel A. Katz Library UTK Law Faculty Publications 12-2016 A More Charitable Charity: Administrative Necessity Provides an Opportunity to Promote Altruism in Charities Eric Franklin Amarante Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.law.utk.edu/utklaw_facpubs Part of the Law Commons A MORE CHARITABLE CHARITY: ADMINISTRATIVE NECESSITY PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY TO PROMOTE ALTRUISM IN CHARITIES Eric Franklin* ABSTRACT The law of charities governs an absurdly wide-ranging field of organizations. A small group of antiquated statutes purport to govern a diversity of entities that range from hospitals worth millions of dollars to purely volunteer-run organizations that provide free childcare. Given the expansive nature of the law of charities, perhaps it is understandable that the law lacks a coherent guiding principle. This alone would not be problematic if not for the fact that most tax-exempt organizations do not comport with the general public’s idea of charity. An intuitive definition of charity relies upon a lack of self-regard. In other words, charity requires some level of altruism. But many charities pay lavish salaries and some are major players in the crass commercialism of the private market; such activities are far from any reasonable definition of altruism. Thus, to the extent that we expect charitable organizations to exhibit some level of altruism, the concept of charity has been stretched to a level that is almost unrecognizable. In addition to diluting the concept of charity, the over-inclusive nature of tax-exempt law resulted in an unreasonable administrative burden for the IRS.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Fundraising Terms
    GLOSSARY OF FUNDRAISING TERMS accountability The responsibility of the donee organization to keep a donor informed about the use that is made of the donor ’ s gift as well as the cost of raising it. acknowledgment Written expression of gratitude for gift or service. acknowledgment letter A letter sent by a donee, or on behalf of a donee, to the donor, expressing appreciation for a gift and identifying the use that will be make of the gift. An acknowledgment letter may be a form letter, but it is usually personalized. acquisition mailing (or prospect mailing) A mailing to prospects to acquire new members or donors. advance gifts Gifts given or pledged in advance of a public announcement of a campaign. Advance gifts are solicited before a campaign is announced because the success or failure of a campaign may depend on the size of the advance gifts. advisory board A group of infl uential and prominent individuals whose association with a development program is calculated to lend luster and implied endorsement of the program ’ s goals and objectives. Source: Principles and Techniques of Fund Raising (Indianapolis: The Fund Raising School, 2009b). Glossary of Fund Raising Terms (Alexandria, VA: Association of Fundraising Professionals, 2003). Copyright © 2010, Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP), all rights reserved. Reprinted with permission from AFP. 463 bbgloss.inddgloss.indd 446363 110/5/100/5/10 110:13:540:13:54 AAMM 464 Glossary of Fundraising Terms analysis That section of a study that deals with the factors essential to success in a fundraising program; principally the case for support, leadership potential, and fi elds of support.
    [Show full text]