Non-Native Crayfish in Scotland, with a Main Focus on P

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Non-Native Crayfish in Scotland, with a Main Focus on P Gladman, Zara F. (2012) Crayfish in Scotland. PhD thesis. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/3977/ Copyright and moral rights for this thesis are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Glasgow Theses Service http://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] Crayfish in Scotland Zara F. Gladman Submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences University of Glasgow December 2012 2 Abstract Unlike the rest of Britain, Scotland has no native crayfish species. There are, however, two introduced species: the white-clawed crayfish (Austropotamobius pallipes) has inhabited Loch Croispol in Sutherland and Whitemoss Reservoir in Renfrewshire for several decades. A. pallipes is endangered in its native range and Scottish stocks may constitute an important conservation resource in the future. The other crayfish species in Scotland, the North American signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) was first recorded in the wild in 1995 and has spread rapidly to inhabit many river catchments and standing waters, where it is considered a serious threat to native biodiversity. The purpose of this thesis was to conduct research into the distribution, control and impact of non-native crayfish in Scotland, with a main focus on P. leniusculus. A comparative field study on the River Clyde in southern-central Scotland was used to test the efficacy of different sampling methods for detecting P. leniusculus in shallow, flowing waters. A combination of kick-sampling and three-run electrofishing was shown to be the most effective method and assisted in the development of a crayfish detection protocol. This protocol has been applied by fishery trusts across Scotland to determine the fine- scale distribution of P. leniusculus in rivers. Results of a radio-tracking study in the River Clyde catchment showed that P. leniusculus moves up to 195 m day -1 in lotic habitats, with flow and in-stream barriers identified as potential impediments to movement. In addition to studies of P. leniusculus, surveys were undertaken to assess the status of the two A. pallipes populations in Scotland. Results showed the occurrence of a low density and high density population at Loch Croispol and Whitemoss Reservoir respectively. These sites could serve as long-term “ex-situ” ark sites for A. pallipes but only if measures are taken to mitigate the current biosecurity threats of P. leniusculus and disease. 3 Laboratory studies were used to assess the potential threat of P. leniusculus to Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) redds and the globally endangered freshwater pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera). The burial of Salmo salar eggs in redds appears to afford protection from predation by P. leniusculus but other life stages may be at greater risk. Crayfish attempted to predate upon M. margaritifera but were unsuccessful, probably due to the thick, protective shell of the adult mussels tested; predation of juvenile mussels is predicted to be more likely. Finally, the impact of a large-scale trapping programme on a population of P. leniusculus in a large lake was evaluated using mark and recapture methods at Loch Ken in southern Scotland. The programme significantly reduced the number of males in the population but its effect on females was complicated by seasonal variation in trappability and the bias of traps towards males. Depth was found to be a significant determinant of the catch of P. leniusculus. Animals were also found to make significant movements of 800 metres in two weeks. Crayfish occur in Loch Ken at densities which are high compared with other lakes and the loss of native biodiversity there is expected to be considerable. Continued research into invasive species such as P. leniusculus will provide valuable data to support management decisions and help tackle what is one of the top five drivers of human-induced global change. 4 Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................... 2 List of Tables ............................................................................... 7 List of Figures .............................................................................. 8 Acknowledgements ...................................................................... 11 Author’s declaration .................................................................... 14 Chapter 1: General introduction ...................................................... 15 1.1 The growing threat of species invasions ............................... 15 1.2 The arrival of North American signal crayfish in Europe: a brief history .............................................................................. 17 1.3 The ecological implications of signal crayfish introductions ....... 21 1.3.1 Impact on macrophytes ............................................. 22 1.3.2 Impact on invertebrates ............................................ 23 1.3.3 Impact on amphibians .............................................. 24 1.3.4 Impact on fish ........................................................ 25 1.4 Non-native crayfish in Scotland: project aims ........................ 26 Chapter 2: Detecting signal crayfish in riffles ...................................... 29 2.1 Abstract .................................................................... 29 2.2 Introduction ................................................................ 30 2.3 Materials and methods ................................................... 31 2.3.1 Study area ............................................................ 31 2.3.2 Sampling procedure ................................................. 32 2.3.3 Statistical analysis ................................................... 33 2.4 Results ...................................................................... 34 2.5 Discussion .................................................................. 38 2.5.1 Hand searching ....................................................... 38 2.5.2 Electrofishing ........................................................ 39 2.5.3 Surber sampling ...................................................... 40 2.5.4 Kick sampling ......................................................... 41 2.5.5 Combinations of techniques ....................................... 42 2.5.6 Conclusions and recommendations ............................... 43 Chapter 3: Movements of signal crayfish in a Scottish river .................... 45 3.1 Abstract .................................................................... 45 3.2 Introduction ................................................................ 46 3.3 Materials and methods ................................................... 48 3.3.1 Study sites ............................................................ 48 3.3.2 Crayfish and tagging ................................................ 49 3.3.3 Daily tracking ........................................................ 50 3.3.4 Overnight tracking ................................................... 51 3.3.5 Environmental measurements ..................................... 51 3.3.6 Statistical analysis ................................................... 51 3.4 Results ...................................................................... 53 3.4.1 Tag retention ......................................................... 53 3.4.2 Movements out of water ............................................ 53 3.4.3 Overnight tracking and burrow occupation ...................... 53 3.4.4 Movement patterns .................................................. 54 3.4.5 Number and distance of movements ............................. 58 Discussion .......................................................................... 68 5 3.4.6 Movement patterns .................................................. 68 3.4.7 Dispersal .............................................................. 73 Chapter 4: The paradox of a non-native but high conservation value species ..................................................................................... 75 4.1 Abstract .................................................................... 75 4.2 Introduction ................................................................ 76 4.3 Materials and methods ................................................... 80 4.3.1 Study sites ............................................................ 80 4.3.2 Survey procedure .................................................... 81 4.3.3 Statistical analysis ................................................... 83 4.4 Results ...................................................................... 84 4.4.1 Abundance ............................................................ 84 4.4.2 Size distribution ..................................................... 84 4.4.3 Sex ratios ............................................................. 85 4.4.4 Ark site suitability ................................................... 86 4.5 Discussion
Recommended publications
  • South Lanarkshire Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy
    South Lanarkshire Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy Report by IronsideFarrar 7948 / February 2016 South Lanarkshire Council Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS 3.3 Landscape Designations 11 3.3.1 National Designations 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page No 3.3.2 Local and Regional Designations 11 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 3.4 Other Designations 12 1.1 Background 1 3.4.1 Natural Heritage designations 12 1.2 National and Local Policy 2 3.4.2 Historic and cultural designations 12 1.3 The Capacity Study 2 3.4.3 Tourism and recreational interests 12 1.4 Landscape Capacity and Cumulative Impacts 2 4.0 VISUAL BASELINE 13 2.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACT AND CAPACITY METHODOLOGY 3 4.1 Visual Receptors 13 2.1 Purpose of Methodology 3 4.2 Visibility Analysis 15 2.2 Study Stages 3 4.2.1 Settlements 15 2.3 Scope of Assessment 4 4.2.2 Routes 15 2.3.1 Area Covered 4 4.2.3 Viewpoints 15 2.3.2 Wind Energy Development Types 4 4.2.4 Analysis of Visibility 15 2.3.3 Use of Geographical Information Systems 4 5.0 WIND TURBINES IN THE STUDY AREA 17 2.4 Landscape and Visual Baseline 4 5.1 Turbine Numbers and Distribution 17 2.5 Method for Determining Landscape Sensitivity and Capacity 4 5.1.1 Operating and Consented Wind Turbines 17 2.6 Defining Landscape Change and Cumulative Capacity 5 5.1.2 Proposed Windfarms and Turbines (at March 2015) 18 2.6.1 Cumulative Change
    [Show full text]
  • Moorland Forum Understanding Predation Report
    scoomids MOORLAND FORUM 16 301,_41., Ant UNDERSTANDING PREDATION A review bringing together natural science and local knowledge of recent wild bird population changes and their drivers in Scotland Centre for LJL UNIVERSITY OF BTO CUNIVERSITY Ecology & Hydrology vy STIRLING 610 Lrx4,ng okr fry berk OF ABERDEEN IIIIUO•C NC•0••••• &IC C OUNCIL Gill Ainsworth (University of Aberdeen), John Calladine (BTO Scotland), Blaise Martay (BTO Scotland), Kirsty Park (University of Stirling), Steve Redpath (University of Aberdeen), Chris Wernham (BTO Scotland), Mark Wilson (BTO Scotland) &Juliette Young (CEH Edinburgh) UNDERSTANDING PREDATION A review bringing together natural science and local knowledge of recent wild bird population changes and their drivers in Scotland Gill Ainsworth (University of Aberdeen), John Calladine (BTO Scotland), Blaise Martay (BTO Scotland), Kirsty Park (University of Stirling), Steve Redpath (University of Aberdeen), Chris Wernham (BTO Scotland), Mark Wilson (BTO Scotland)& Juliette Young (CEH Edinburgh) Page 1 of 382 CONTENTS CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................ 9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Turbine Development Background Report
    NORTH LANARKSHIRE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN MODIFIED PROPOSED PLAN LANDSCAPE CAPACITY STUDY FOR WIND TURBINE DEVELOPMENT BACKGROUND REPORT NOVEMBER 2018 North Lanarkshire Council Enterprise and Communities CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. LUC - Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Turbine Development in Glasgow & Clyde Valley (2014) 3. URS Review of North Lanarkshire Local Landscape Character (2015) 4. Kilsyth Hills Special Landscape Area (SLA) 5. Clyde Valley Special Landscape Area (SLA) Appendices Appendix 1 - LUC - Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Turbine Development in Glasgow & Clyde Valley (2014) Appendix 2 - URS Review of North Lanarkshire Local Landscape Character (2015) 1. Introduction 1.1 The current North Lanarkshire Local Plan was informed by the, Capacity of the North Lanarkshire Landscape to Accommodate Wind Turbine Development (ASH 2008). This Study did not define capacity in terms of a level of development to be achieved, nor did it comment on cumulative impact. In 2013, there was a further Study undertaken by Bayou Bluenvironment that examined, in detail, the Landscape and Visual Sensitivity and the Capacity for wind energy within Fortissat Ward. This Report was commissioned in response to increasing pressure for wind farm development in this part of North Lanarkshire based on the Landscape Character Types from the Glasgow & Clyde Valley Landscape Character Assessment (1999). 1.2 For the North Lanarkshire Local Development Plan Modified Proposed Plan it has been necessary to update the background information in relation to wind
    [Show full text]
  • South Lanarkshire Core Paths Plan Adopted November 2012
    South Lanarkshire Core Paths Plan Adopted November 2012 Core Paths list Core paths list South Lanarkshire UN/5783/1 Core Paths Plan November 2012 Rutherglen - Cambuslang Area Rutherglen - Cambuslang Area Map 16 Path CodeNorth Name Lanarkshire - Location Length (m) Path Code Name - Location LengthLarkhall-Law (m) CR/4/1 Rutherglen Bridge - Rutherglen Rd 360 CR/27/4 Mill Street 137 CR/5/1 Rutherglen Rd - Quay Rd 83 CR/29/1 Mill Street - Rutherglen Cemetery 274Key CR/5/2 Rutherglen Rd 313 CR/30/1 Mill Street - Rodger Drive Core233 Path CR/5/3 Glasgow Rd 99 CR/31/1 Kingsburn Grove-High Crosshill Aspirational530 Core Path Wider Network CR/5/4 Glasgow Rd / Camp Rd 543 CR/32/1 Cityford Burn - Kings Park Ave 182 HM/2280/1 Cross Boundary Link CR/9/1 Dalmarnock Br - Dalmarnock Junction 844 CR/33/1 Kingsheath Ave 460 HM/2470/1 Core Water Path CR/9/2 Dalmarnock Bridge 51 CR/34/1 Bankhead Road Water122 Access/Egress HM/2438/1 CR/13/1 Bridge Street path - Cambuslang footbridge 56 CR/35/1 Cityford Burn Aspirational164 Crossing CR/14/1 Clyde Walkway-NCR75 440 CR/36/1 Cityford Burn SLC276 Boundary Neighbour Boundary CR/15/1 Clyde Walkway - NCR 75 1026 CR/37/1 Landemer Drive 147 North Lanarkshire HM/2471/2 CR/15/2 NCR 75 865 CR/38/1 Landemer Drive Core Path93 Numbering CR/97 Land CR/15/3 Clyde Walkway - NCR 75 127 CR/39/1 Path back of Landemer Drive 63 UN/5775/1 Water CR/16/1 Clydeford Road 149 CR/40/1 Path back of Landemer Drive CL/5780/1 304 W1 Water Access/Egress Code CR/17/1 Clyde Walkway by Carmyle 221 CR/41/1 King's Park Avenue CL/3008/2 43 HM/2439/1
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Cost of Invasive Non-Native Species on Great Britain F
    The Economic Cost of Invasive Non-Native Species on Great Britain F. Williams, R. Eschen, A. Harris, D. Djeddour, C. Pratt, R.S. Shaw, S. Varia, J. Lamontagne-Godwin, S.E. Thomas, S.T. Murphy CAB/001/09 November 2010 www.cabi.org 1 KNOWLEDGE FOR LIFE The Economic Cost of Invasive Non-Native Species on Great Britain Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the input of many people from Great Britain and abroad. We thank all the people who have taken the time to respond to the questionnaire or to provide information over the phone or otherwise. Front Cover Photo – Courtesy of T. Renals Sponsors The Scottish Government Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government Department for the Economy and Transport, Welsh Assembly Government FE Williams, R Eschen, A Harris, DH Djeddour, CF Pratt, RS Shaw, S Varia, JD Lamontagne-Godwin, SE Thomas, ST Murphy CABI Head Office Nosworthy Way Wallingford OX10 8DE UK and CABI Europe - UK Bakeham Lane Egham Surrey TW20 9TY UK CABI Project No. VM10066 2 The Economic Cost of Invasive Non-Native Species on Great Britain Executive Summary The impact of Invasive Non-Native Species (INNS) can be manifold, ranging from loss of crops, damaged buildings, and additional production costs to the loss of livelihoods and ecosystem services. INNS are increasingly abundant in Great Britain and in Europe generally and their impact is rising. Hence, INNS are the subject of considerable concern in Great Britain, prompting the development of a Non-Native Species Strategy and the formation of the GB Non-Native Species Programme Board and Secretariat.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Environment Baseline.Pdf
    Moray Offshore Renewables Limited - Environmental Statement Telford, Stevenson and MacColl Offshore Wind Farms and Transmission Infrastructure 5 Human Environment 5.1 Commercial Fisheries 5.1 5.1.1 Introduction 5.1.1.1 This chapter summarises the baseline study of commercial fishing activities, including salmon and sea trout fisheries, in the vicinity of the three proposed development sites (Telford, Stevenson and MacColl) and the offshore transmission infrastructure (OfTI). For the purpose of this study, commercial fishing is defined as CHAPTER any legal fishing activity undertaken for declared taxable profit. 5.1.1.2 The following technical appendices support this chapter and can be found as: Technical Appendix 4.3 B (Salmon and Sea Trout Ecology Technical Report). Technical Appendix 5.1 A (Commercial Fisheries Technical Report). 5.1.1.3 For the purposes of this assessment, salmon and sea trout fisheries in the Moray Firth are separately addressed to other commercial fisheries, as a result of their being located largely in-river (with the exception of some coastal netting) and being different in nature to the majority of marine commercial fishing activities. In addition, due to the migratory behaviour of salmon and sea trout, fisheries have been assessed for all rivers flowing into the Moray Firth. It is also recognised that salmon is a qualifying feature or primary reason for Special Area of Conservation (SAC) site selection of the following rivers in the Moray Firth: Berriedale and Langwell Waters SAC (primary reason); River Moriston
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Turbine Development in Glasgow and the Clyde Valley
    Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Turbine Development in Glasgow and the Clyde Valley Overview Report Prepared by LUC for the Glasgow and the Clyde Valley Strategic Development Plan Authority September 2014 Project Title: Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Turbine Development in Glasgow and the Clyde Valley Client: Glasgow and the Clyde Valley Strategic Development Plan Authority In association with: Scottish Natural Heritage East Dunbartonshire Council East Renfrewshire Council Glasgow City Council Inverclyde Council North Lanarkshire Council Renfrewshire Council South Lanarkshire Council West Dunbartonshire Council Version Date Version Details Prepared by Checked by Approved by Principal 0.1 15 November Internal draft LUC PDM NJ 2013 0.2 22 November Interim draft for LUC PDM NJ 2013 discussion 1.0 25 March Draft LUC NJ NJ 2014 2.0 6 June 2014 Final LUC PDM NJ 3.0 11 September Revised LUC PDM NJ 2014 H:\1 Projects\58\5867 LIVE GCV wind farm study\B Project Working\REPORT\Overview report\GCV Report v3 20140911.docx Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Turbine Development in Glasgow and the Clyde Valley Overview Report Prepared by LUC for the Glasgow and the Clyde Valley Strategic Development Plan Authority September 2014 Planning & EIA LUC GLASGOW Offices also in: Land Use Consultants Ltd Registered in England Design 37 Otago Street London Registered number: 2549296 Landscape Planning Glasgow G12 8JJ Bristol Registered Office: Landscape Management Tel: 0141 334 9595 Edinburgh 43 Chalton Street Ecology Fax: 0141 334 7789 London NW1
    [Show full text]
  • Glasgow Rivers and Streams Their Legend and Lore
    GLASGOW RIVERS AND STREAMS THEIR LEGEND AND LORE ’ Clyde s First Bridge . n e One mile f r om the sou . PREFACE TH E following chapters embody the results of a ’ summer s wayfaring a mong the green hills and grey moorlands which lie around Glasgow town . ' These wedges of wild nature and old r omance thrust themselves into the heart of a very workaday a nd world . They sweeten its atmosphere , remind uS of wide - Spreading Spaces where sunshine and S r hadow dwell , whe e the only sounds are the half c r wail , half wile of the peesweep , the y of the lonely whaup , and the soft music of hidden waters . Among these solemn wastes where earth and sky seem to meet in perfect harmony , we find the r and crystal cradle of the Clyde , and of the ivers She streams to which beckons , as a mother to her r r wayward children . As they hu ry to the eve lasting her shelter of ample bosom , they tumble down . r ‘ r through red scau s , and th ough shadowed glens , t valleys akin to hose of which Stevenson sang , vi PREFACE where birds are on every tree and in every corner r e r s of the ove hanging woods , pealing out th i note air is until the full of them . They pass grim r e embattled towe s and ancient mills , th y form into deep pools where the children of old- world villages are to be seen on the summer afternoons looking - r r for yellow bellied t out , still eaches over which ' tree and cloud weave dissolving patterns of light r r r and b ightness , places of tende beauty whe e it is good for a man to be alone with nature and r r himself.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO's RETIREMENT? Essays in Honour of Peter Volten
    NATO’S RETIREMENT? Essays in Honour of Peter Volten Margriet Drent, Arjan van den Assem, Jaap de Wilde, editors 2011 GREENWOOD PAPER 26 NATO’s Retirement? Essays in honour of Peter Volten. Editors: Margriet Drent, Arjan van den Assem, Jaap de Wilde First published in January 2011 by The Centre of European Security Studies (CESS) Lutkenieuwstraat 31 A 9712 AW Groningen The Netherlands Director: Peter Volten ISBN: 978-90-76301-28-0 Copyright © 2011 by CESS All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Centre for European Security Studies (CESS) is an independent institute for research, consultancy, education and training, based in the Netherlands. Its aim is to promote transparent, accountable and effective governance of the security sector, broadly defined. It seeks to advance democracy and the rule of law, help governments and civil society face their security challenges, and further the civilized and lawful resolution of conflict. The Man behind the Greenwood Papers Resting his fists on the lectern, he would fix his audience with a glare and pronounce: “REVEAL, EXPLAIN AND JUSTIFY.” It was his golden rule of democratic governance. David Greenwood was born in England in 1937 and died in 2009 in Scotland. He first worked for the British Ministry of Defence, then went on to teach political economy at Aberdeen University, where he later became the director of the Centre for Defence Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report No 5 the History of the Daer Valley
    Interim Report No 5 The History of the Daer Valley Tam Ward April 2002 Abstract This report describes an evolving project to determine the history, from earliest times to the present, of a single valley in the Southern Uplands of Scotland. Local voluntary archaeologists from Biggar Archaeology Group have conducted a series of field surveys and excavations, which have produced evidence of Mesolithic, Neolithic, Bronze Age, Post Medieval and Later people. The work is supplemented by a programme of historical, cartographic and oral research. Introduction Taken at face value and more often than not from within a car, the many landscapes which one passes through appears not to attract more than a cursory glance. This is because in the modern world, one normally only has a fleeting glimpse of the countryside as we move along at high speed. Only if there happens to be a particularly attractive or dramatic feature, natural or man-made, and which is obvious to the eye, will it be recalled or commented upon. Sadly, this is an endemic aspect of our modern hectic society, it is also one of the reasons why there appears to be such a poor understanding of the importance of the historic landscape, for economic use and for the purposes of education, leisure and recreation. Every hill, river, farm or settlement has a story; it may be a tale of geology, natural history or the history of people. It is to the latter that this paper is given over and to that end, a seemingly lonely valley, seldom seen, bleak when it is bleak but not without attraction on a fine day, has been chosen to tell a story; the History of the Daer Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Document
    South Lanarkshire Council Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 13. SOUTHERN UPLANDS Southern Uplands is an upland type located in the south of South Lanarkshire. The type comprises ranges of large scale steep rounded hills separated by deep Upland Glens and the Broad Valley Upland of the Clyde. Eastern areas are extensively affected by forestry, the M74 communications corridor and latterly by extensive windfarm development. Western and southern areas are much less developed and less afforested, having some aspects of wildness in their character, but also with extensive evidence of past mining around Leadhills. Three landscape character areas are identified: (i) East of Clyde/ Daer; (ii) Lowther Hills (Around Daer Water); (iii) Lowther Hills (West of Clyde/ Daer) IronsideFarrar 50 7948/ Feb 2016 South Lanarkshire Council Landscape Capacity Study for Wind Energy _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Table 6.1(j) Summary of Landscape Capacity, Cumulative Effects and Guidance for Future Wind Energy Development in Southern Uplands (see also Figures 6.1 to 6.4 for maps) Key: No Capacity Low Capacity Medium Capacity High Capacity UNDERLYING LANDSCAPE CAPACITY (i.e. not CURRENT CONSENTED
    [Show full text]
  • South Lanarkshire Local Transport Strategy Strategic Environmental Assessment
    Environment South Lanarkshire Council March 2013 South Lanarkshire Local Transport Strategy Strategic Environmental Assessment Prepared by: CC ................. Checked by: IB ................... Charlotte Clinton Iain Bell Senior Consultant Regional Director Approved by: CC ................. Charlotte Clinton Senior Consultant Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 2 Final Draft for Consultation following Client Review IB CC 18/03/2013 1 Initial Draft for Client Review IB CC 07/02/2013 Telephone: Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No Reference Date Created: August 2012 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM Limited and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM Limited, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM Limited. f:\proposal\3512\south lanakshire lts\sea\er\client review\final draft for consultation\south lanarkshire lts environmental report final draft.doc Table of Contents 1 Introduction................................................................................................................................................................ 2 2 The Local Transport Strategy ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]