DOCSLIB.ORG

Minimal Coupling and Berry's Phase

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Minimal Coupling and Berry's Phase Phys460.nb 63 5 Minimal coupling and Berry’s phase Q: For charged quantum particles (e.g. electrons), if we apply an E&M field (E or B), the particle will feel the field. How do we consider the effect E and B fields in quantum mechanics? A: Minimal coupling 5.1. Minimal coupling 5.1.1. review on E&M (vector potential and gauge transformations) → In E&M, we learned that we can describe E and B fields using “potentials”: scalar potential φ and vector potential A. → → ∂ A E = -∇ φ - (5.1) ∂ t and → → B = ∇ ×A (5.2) In addition, we learned that the potentials are NOT uniquely defined. In fact, we can change the scalar and vector potential in the following way, which would NOT change E and B fields and thus all physics would remain the same. ∂ Λ→r, t φ→r → φ' →r = φ→r - (5.3) ∂ t → → → A→r → A' →r = A→r + ∇ Λ→r, t (5.4) where Λ→r, t is any arbitrary function of →r and t. → → To prove that these new potentials φ' and A ' gives exactly the same E and B fields as φ and A, we compute the corresponding field strength → → ∂ A + ∇ Λ → → → ∂ A' ∂ Λ ∂ Λ ∂ A ∂ ∇ Λ ∂ A ∂ Λ ∂ ∇ Λ E' = -∇ φ' - = -∇ φ - - = -∇ φ + ∇ - - = -∇ φ - + ∇ - (5.5) ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t The last two terms are identical (with opposite sign), so they cancel. → → → ∂ A ∂ Λ ∂ ∇ Λ ∂ A → E' = -∇ φ - + ∇ - = -∇ φ - = E (5.6) ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t So, the E field remains the same when we change φ and A to φ' and A'. For the B field, → → → → B' = ∇ ×A' = ∇ ×A + ∇ Λ = ∇ ×A + ∇ ×∇ Λ (5.7) 64 Phys460.nb The last term contains ∇×∇, which is zero (The cross product for a vector with itself is always zero). → → → → B' = ∇ ×A + ∇ ×∇ Λ = ∇ ×A = B (5.8) So, the B field remains the same when we change φ and A to φ' and A'. As a results, we can freely to choose whether we want to use φ and A as our potentials or φ' and A'. This “free choice” is known as a gauge choice. Using a different gauge will NOT change any physics. The transformation mentioned above is known as a gauge transformation ∂ Λ φ → φ' = φ - (5.9) ∂ t → → → A → A' = A + ∇ Λ (5.10) Comment: scalar and vector potentials φ and A are NOT measurable quantities. In E&M we can only measure E and B. We cannot measure φ and A. This is because we can freely choose a different gauge, which changes the value of φ and A. On the other hand, for any measurable quantities, we can measure its value, and thus it must have a unique value. Since φ and A do not have unique values, they cannot be measurable quantities. In fact, we get a more general statement along the same line of thinking: any gauge-dependent quantity (i.e. a quantity whose value changes when we choose a different gauge), can NOT be a measurable quantity. 5.1.2. Gauge transformation in quantum mechanics In classical physics, gauge transformation only changes potentials. Matters (e.g. motion of particles) don’t care about gauge choice at all. This is because in classical physics, the motion of a particle (or any other objects) are described by measurable quantities (e.g. velocity, momentum, mass, etc). For measurable quantities, we know they can NOT change under gauge transformations. However, in quantum, the story is different. Because in quantum mechanics, matters are described by a non-measurable quantity: i.e., the wavefunction ψ→r, t. The wavefunction is a complex function. The absolute value of the wavefunction is a measurable quantity (i.e. the square of the absolute value is the probability to find a particle at this point). However, the phase of a wavefunction is NOT measurable. As a result, (at least in principle), the phase of a wavefunction could depends on the gauge choice. In fact, this is exactly what happens in quantum mechanics. ∂ Λ φ → φ' = φ - (5.11) ∂ t → → → A → A' = A + ∇ Λ (5.12) q Λ ⅈ ψ → ψ' = ψ ⅇ ℏ (5.13) where q is the charge of the particle. Comment: for charge neutral particles, q = 0, the wavefunction doesn't change, when we switch from φ and A to φ' and A'. But for any charged particles, the complex phase of the wavefunction must change, when we switch to a different gauge choice. To prove why we need to change the wavefunction when we change to a different gauge, we shall look at the Schrodinger equation. For any physics law, it should be invariant (i.e. remains the same) when we change to a different gauge (because different gauge choices describes exactly the same physics). As will be shown below, for the Schrodinger equation (which is one fundamental physics law), if we do not change the wavefunction, it would NOT remain the same after we switch to a different gauge. And the only way to ensure that the Schrodinger equation doesn’t change is to change the wavefunction according to the transformation describe above. 5.1.3. Minimal coupling Now, we try to write down the Schrodinger’s equation for a charged particle moving in E and B fields. The way to couple the motion of a charged particle with E&B fields is known as the minimal coupling. We start from charge neutral particles with q = 0, whose Schrodinger equation is Phys460.nb 65 2 ∂ ψ P ⅈ ℏ = + V(r) ψ (5.14) ∂ t 2 m where P = -ⅈℏ ∇ is the momentum quantum operator. Now, if we want to describe the motion of a charged particle, we only need to do the following → -ⅈ ℏ ∇ → -ⅈ ℏ ∇ -q A (5.15) In addition, we need to do one more thing ∂ ∂ ⅈℏ → ⅈℏ -q φ (5.16) ∂ t ∂ t In summary, what we need to do are two things: ∂ ∂ ⅈℏ → ⅈℏ -q φ (5.17) ∂ t ∂ t and → -ⅈ ℏ ∇ → -ⅈ ℏ ∇ -q A (5.18) More precisely, this are four formulas, instead of two, because the last formula is a vector formula with three components, x, y and z ∂ ∂ ⅈℏ → ⅈℏ -q φ (5.19) ∂ t ∂ t -ⅈ ℏ ∂x → -ⅈ ℏ ∂x -q Ax (5.20) -ⅈ ℏ ∂y → -ⅈ ℏ ∂y -q Ay (5.21) -ⅈ ℏ ∂z → -ⅈ ℏ ∂z -q Az (5.22) When we have four formulas (one related with time and three with space), special relativity told us that we can often combine them together as one four-dimensional vector formula. → In special relativity, we can combine ϕ and A together as a four-dimensional vector, known has the electromagnetic four-potential φ μ A = , Ax, Ay, Ay (5.23) c In the same time, we can group ∂ and ∇ together as a four-dimensional vector, known as the four-gradient ∂t 1 ∂ μ ∂ = , -∂x, -∂y, -∂y (5.24) c ∂ t As a result, when we study charged particles, we can start from the Schrodinger equation for a charge neutral particle. Whenever, we see a (time or spatial) derivative , we do the following substitution. ⅈ ℏ ∂μ → ⅈ ℏ ∂μ -q Aμ (5.25) Now, let’s try the minimal coupling on the following Schrodinger equation ∂ (-ⅈ ℏ ∇)2 ⅈ ℏ ψ = + V(r) ψ (5.26) ∂ t 2 m After we do the minimal substitution, we get ∂ (-ⅈ ℏ ∇ -q A)2 ⅈ ℏ -q φ ψ = + V(r) ψ (5.27) ∂ t 2 m ∂ (-ⅈ ℏ ∇ -q A)2 ⅈ ℏ ψ - q φ ψ = + V(r) ψ (5.28) ∂ t 2 m we can move the second term on the l.h.s. to the r.h.s. 66 Phys460.nb ∂ (-ⅈ ℏ ∇ -q A)2 ⅈ ℏ ψ = + V(r) ψ + q φ ψ (5.29) ∂ t 2 m ∂ (-ⅈ ℏ ∇ -q A)2 ⅈ ℏ ψ = + V(r) + q φ ψ (5.30) ∂ t 2 m And know, we can define a new Hamiltonian (-ⅈ ℏ ∇ -q A)2 H = + V(r) + q φ (5.31) 2 m The minimal coupling told us that the Hamiltonian has two modifications: 1. For the kinetic energy, the momentum is not longer just a derivative. We get an extra part q A. This part is new, and it is the first time that we learned it (unless your theoretical mechanics class discussed similar topics for Hamiltonian mechanics). 2. For the potential energy, we get an additional contribution q φ. This part is NOT new and NOT surprising at all. For static electrics, scalar potential φ is just the “electric potential”. If we have a charge particle with charge q moving in the presence of electric potential φ, it gets a potential energy q φ. 5.1.4. Verify the gauge transformation Now we prove that the Schrodinger equation with minimal coupling is invariant under the gauge transformation ∂ Λ φ → φ' = φ - (5.32) ∂ t → → → A → A' = A + ∇ Λ (5.33) q Λ ⅈ ψ → ψ' = ψ ⅇ ℏ (5.34) We know that ∂ (-ⅈ ℏ ∇ -q A)2 ⅈ ℏ -q φ ψ = + V(r) ψ (5.35) ∂ t 2 m Now, if we change to a different gauge, ψ', φ' and A', the Schrodinger equation shall remain the same. We start from the l.h.s.. After the gauge transformation, it becomes ∂ ∂ ψ' ⅈ ℏ -q φ' ψ' = ⅈ ℏ -q φ' ψ' (5.36) ∂ t ∂ t For the first term q Λ q Λ ⅈ ⅈ ℏ q Λ ℏ q Λ q Λ ∂ ψ' ∂ ψ ⅇ ⅈ ∂ ψ ∂ ⅇ ⅈ ∂ ψ ⅈ ∂ Λ ⅈ ℏ = ⅈ ℏ = ⅈ ℏ ⅇ ℏ + ⅈ ℏ ψ = ⅈ ℏ ⅇ ℏ - q ψ ⅇ ℏ ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t (5.37) q Λ ⅈ ∂ ψ ∂ Λ = ⅇ ℏ ⅈ ℏ - q ℏ ψ ∂ t ∂ t As a result, q Λ q Λ ∂ ∂ ψ' ⅈ ∂ ψ ∂ Λ ⅈ ⅈ ℏ -q φ' ψ' = ⅈ ℏ - q φ' ψ' = ⅇ ℏ ⅈ ℏ - q ψ - q φ' ⅇ ℏ ψ ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t ∂ t q Λ ⅈ ∂ ψ ∂ Λ = ⅇ ℏ ⅈ ℏ - q ψ - q φ' ψ ∂ t ∂ t q Λ (5.38) ⅈ ∂ ψ ∂ Λ = ⅇ ℏ ⅈ ℏ - q φ' + ψ ∂ t ∂ t q Λ ⅈ ∂ ψ = ⅇ ℏ ⅈ ℏ - q φ ψ ∂ t Now, we look a the right hand side.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Quantum Field Theory*
    Quantum Field Theory y Frank Wilczek Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Science, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 I discuss the general principles underlying quantum eld theory, and attempt to identify its most profound consequences. The deep est of these consequences result from the in nite number of degrees of freedom invoked to implement lo cality.Imention a few of its most striking successes, b oth achieved and prosp ective. Possible limitation s of quantum eld theory are viewed in the light of its history. I. SURVEY Quantum eld theory is the framework in which the regnant theories of the electroweak and strong interactions, which together form the Standard Mo del, are formulated. Quantum electro dynamics (QED), b esides providing a com- plete foundation for atomic physics and chemistry, has supp orted calculations of physical quantities with unparalleled precision. The exp erimentally measured value of the magnetic dip ole moment of the muon, 11 (g 2) = 233 184 600 (1680) 10 ; (1) exp: for example, should b e compared with the theoretical prediction 11 (g 2) = 233 183 478 (308) 10 : (2) theor: In quantum chromo dynamics (QCD) we cannot, for the forseeable future, aspire to to comparable accuracy.Yet QCD provides di erent, and at least equally impressive, evidence for the validity of the basic principles of quantum eld theory. Indeed, b ecause in QCD the interactions are stronger, QCD manifests a wider variety of phenomena characteristic of quantum eld theory. These include esp ecially running of the e ective coupling with distance or energy scale and the phenomenon of con nement.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmological Dynamics with Non-Minimally Coupled Scalar Field and a Constant Potential Function
    Prepared for submission to JCAP Cosmological dynamics with non-minimally coupled scalar field and a constant potential function Orest Hrycynaa and Marek Szyd lowskib,c aTheoretical Physics Division, National Centre for Nuclear Research, Ho˙za 69, 00-681 Warszawa, Poland bAstronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, Orla 171, 30-244 Krak´ow, Poland cMark Kac Complex Systems Research Centre, Jagiellonian University, Lojasiewicza 11, 30-348 Krak´ow, Poland E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Dynamical systems methods are used to investigate global behaviour of the spatially flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker cosmological model in gravitational the- ory with a non-minimally coupled scalar field and a constant potential function. We show that the system can be reduced to an autonomous three-dimensional dynamical system and additionally is equipped with an invariant manifold corresponding to an accelerated expansion of the universe. Using this invariant manifold we find an ex- act solution of the reduced dynamics. We investigate all solutions for all admissible initial conditions using theory of dynamical systems to obtain a classification of all evolutional paths. The right-hand sides of the dynamical system depend crucially on the value of the non-minimal coupling constant therefore we study bifurcation values of this parameter under which the structure of the phase space changes qualitatively. arXiv:1506.03429v2 [gr-qc] 10 Nov 2015 We found a special bifurcation value of the non-minimal coupling constant
    [Show full text]
  • Avoiding Gauge Ambiguities in Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics Dominic M
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Avoiding gauge ambiguities in cavity quantum electrodynamics Dominic M. Rouse1*, Brendon W. Lovett1, Erik M. Gauger2 & Niclas Westerberg2,3* Systems of interacting charges and felds are ubiquitous in physics. Recently, it has been shown that Hamiltonians derived using diferent gauges can yield diferent physical results when matter degrees of freedom are truncated to a few low-lying energy eigenstates. This efect is particularly prominent in the ultra-strong coupling regime. Such ambiguities arise because transformations reshufe the partition between light and matter degrees of freedom and so level truncation is a gauge dependent approximation. To avoid this gauge ambiguity, we redefne the electromagnetic felds in terms of potentials for which the resulting canonical momenta and Hamiltonian are explicitly unchanged by the gauge choice of this theory. Instead the light/matter partition is assigned by the intuitive choice of separating an electric feld between displacement and polarisation contributions. This approach is an attractive choice in typical cavity quantum electrodynamics situations. Te gauge invariance of quantum electrodynamics (QED) is fundamental to the theory and can be used to greatly simplify calculations1–8. Of course, gauge invariance implies that physical observables are the same in all gauges despite superfcial diferences in the mathematics. However, it has recently been shown that the invariance is lost in the strong light/matter coupling regime if the matter degrees of freedom are treated as quantum systems with a fxed number of energy levels8–14, including the commonly used two-level truncation (2LT). At the origin of this is the role of gauge transformations (GTs) in deciding the partition between the light and matter degrees of freedom, even if the primary role of gauge freedom is to enforce Gauss’s law.
    [Show full text]
  • Quartic Inflation and Radiative Corrections with Non-Minimal Coupling
    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics Quartic inflation and radiative corrections with non-minimal coupling To cite this article: Nilay Bostan and Vedat Nefer enouz JCAP10(2019)028 View the article online for updates and enhancements. This content was downloaded from IP address 129.255.225.189 on 24/12/2019 at 00:03 ournal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics JAn IOP and SISSA journal Quartic inflation and radiative corrections with non-minimal coupling JCAP10(2019)028 Nilay Bostana;b and Vedat Nefer S¸eno˘guza;1 aDepartment of Physics, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Silah¸s¨orCad. No. 89, Istanbul_ 34380, Turkey bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Received July 22, 2019 Accepted September 19, 2019 Published October 8, 2019 Abstract. It is well known that the non-minimal coupling ξφ2R between the inflaton and the Ricci scalar affects predictions of single field inflation models. In particular, the λφ4 quartic inflation potential with ξ & 0:005 is one of the simplest models that agree with the current data. After reviewing the inflationary predictions of this potential, we analyze the effects of the radiative corrections due to couplings of the inflaton to other scalar fields or fermions. Using two different prescriptions discussed in the literature, we calculate the range of these coupling parameter values for which the spectral index ns and the tensor-to-scalar ratio r are in agreement with the data taken by the Keck Array/BICEP2 and Planck collaborations.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 22 Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Background
    Lecture 22 Relativistic Quantum Mechanics Background Why study relativistic quantum mechanics? 1 Many experimental phenomena cannot be understood within purely non-relativistic domain. e.g. quantum mechanical spin, emergence of new sub-atomic particles, etc. 2 New phenomena appear at relativistic velocities. e.g. particle production, antiparticles, etc. 3 Aesthetically and intellectually it would be profoundly unsatisfactory if relativity and quantum mechanics could not be united. Background When is a particle relativistic? 1 When velocity approaches speed of light c or, more intrinsically, when energy is large compared to rest mass energy, mc2. e.g. protons at CERN are accelerated to energies of ca. 300GeV (1GeV= 109eV) much larger than rest mass energy, 0.94 GeV. 2 Photons have zero rest mass and always travel at the speed of light – they are never non-relativistic! Background What new phenomena occur? 1 Particle production e.g. electron-positron pairs by energetic γ-rays in matter. 2 Vacuum instability: If binding energy of electron 2 4 Z e m 2 Ebind = > 2mc 2!2 a nucleus with initially no electrons is instantly screened by creation of electron/positron pairs from vacuum 3 Spin: emerges naturally from relativistic formulation Background When does relativity intrude on QM? 1 When E mc2, i.e. p mc kin ∼ ∼ 2 From uncertainty relation, ∆x∆p > h, this translates to a length h ∆x > = λ mc c the Compton wavelength. 3 for massless particles, λc = , i.e. relativity always important for, e.g., photons. ∞ Relativistic quantum mechanics: outline
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Corrections to Quartic Inflation with a Non-Minimal Coupling
    IMPERIAL/TP/2017/TM/03 CERN-TH-2017-267 Prepared for submission to JCAP Quantum corrections to quartic inflation with a non-minimal coupling: metric vs. Palatini Tommi Markkanen,a Tommi Tenkanen,b Ville Vaskonen,c and Hardi Veerm¨aec;d aDepartment of Physics, Imperial College London, Blackett Laboratory, London, SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom bAstronomy Unit, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, United Kingdom cNational Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, R¨avala 10, 10143 Tallinn, Estonia dTheoretical Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], ville.vaskonen@kbfi.ee, [email protected] Abstract. We study models of quartic inflation where the inflaton field φ is coupled non- minimally to gravity, ξφ2R, and perform a study of quantum corrections in curved space-time at one-loop level. We specifically focus on comparing results between the metric and Palatini theories of gravity. Transformation from the Jordan to the Einstein frame gives different results for the two formulations and by using an effective field theory expansion we derive the appropriate β-functions and the renormalisation group improved effective potentials in arXiv:1712.04874v2 [gr-qc] 13 Mar 2018 curved space for both cases in the Einstein frame. In particular, we show that in both formalisms the Einstein frame depends on the order of perturbation theory but that the flatness of the potential is unaltered by quantum corrections. Contents 1 Introduction1 2 Inflation with a non-minimal coupling to gravity2 3 Quantum corrections in curved space5 3.1 Effective energy density in curved space6 3.2 Effective field equation in curved space7 3.3 Form of the one-loop corrections8 3.4 Renormalisation group improvement and β-functions8 4 Results 10 5 Conclusions 11 1 Introduction Many successful models of cosmic inflation exhibit a non-minimal coupling between matter fields and gravity [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
    Chapter 10 Relativistic Quantum Mechanics In this Chapter we will address the issue that the laws of physics must be formulated in a form which is Lorentz{invariant, i.e., the description should not allow one to differentiate between frames of reference which are moving relative to each other with a constant uniform velocity ~v. The transformations beween such frames according to the Theory of Special Relativity are described by Lorentz transformations. In case that ~v is oriented along the x1{axis, i.e., ~v = v1x^1, these transformations are v1 x1 v1t t c2 x1 x1 = − ; t0 = − ; x20 = x2 ; x30 = x3 (10.1) 2 2 0 1 v1 1 v1 q − c q − c which connect space time coordinates (x1; x2; x3; t) in one frame with space time coordinates (x10 ; x20 ; x30 ; t0) in another frame. Here c denotes the velocity of light. We will introduce below Lorentz-invariant differential equations which take the place of the Schr¨odingerequation of a par- ticle of mass m and charge q in an electromagnetic field [c.f. (refeq:ham2, 8.45)] described by an electrical potential V (~r; t) and a vector potential A~(~r; t) @ 1 ~ q 2 i~ (~r; t) = A~(~r; t) + qV (~r; t) (~r; t) (10.2) @t 2m i r − c The replacement of (10.2) by Lorentz{invariant equations will have two surprising and extremely important consequences: some of the equations need to be formulated in a representation for which the wave functions (~r; t) are vectors of dimension larger one, the components representing the spin attribute of particles and also representing together with a particle its anti-particle.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gauge-Invariant Lagrangian, the Power–Zienau–Woolley Picture, and the Choices of Field Momenta in Nonrelativistic Quantu
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The gauge‑invariant Lagrangian, MATTERS ARISING the Power–Zienau–Woolley picture, and the choices of feld momenta in nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics A. Vukics *, G. Kónya & P. Domokos arising from: E. Rousseau and D. Felbacq; Scientifc Reports https://​doi.​org/​10.​1038/​s41598-​017-​11076-5​(2017). We show that the Power–Zienau–Woolley picture of the electrodynamics of nonrelativistic neutral particles (atoms) can be derived from a gauge-invariant Lagrangian without making reference to any gauge whatsoever in the process. Tis equivalence is independent of choices of canonical feld momentum or quantization strategies. In the process, we emphasize that in nonrelativistic (quantum) electrodynamics, the always appropriate general- ized coordinate for the feld is the transverse part of the vector potential, which is itself gauge invariant, and the use of which we recommend regardless of the choice of gauge, since in this way it is possible to sidestep most issues of constraints. Furthermore, we point out a freedom of choice for the conjugate momenta in the respective pictures, the conventional choices being appropriate in the sense that they reduce the set of system constraints. Let us consider a neutral atom consisting of nonrelativistic point particles coupled to the electromagnetic feld. To describe this system either classically or quantum mechanically, one can use diferent formulations of the same dynamics. One approach uses the minimal-coupling Hamiltonian, while another approach uses the multipolar Hamiltonian. Tis latter Hamiltonian is conventionally derived through a unitary transformation, which is referred to as the Power–Zienau–Woolley (PZW) transformation. In a recent article, Rousseau and Felbacq1 argue that the derivation of the multipolar Hamiltonian based on the PZW transformation is inconsistent, based on consideration of gauges, constraints, and choices of canonical momenta.
    [Show full text]
  • Lectures in Quantum Field Theory Lecture 1
    Instituto Superior T´ecnico Lectures in Quantum Field Theory Lecture 1 Jorge C. Rom˜ao Instituto Superior T´ecnico, Departamento de F´ısica & CFTP A. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal January 2014 Jorge C. Rom˜ao IDPASC School Braga – 1 IST Summary of Lectures Summary ❐ Part 1 – Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (Lecture 1) Introduction Klein-Gordon Eq. ◆ The basic principles of Quantum Mechanics and Special Relativity Dirac Equation Covariance Dirac Eq. ◆ Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations Free Particle Solutions ◆ Gamma matrices and spinors Minimal Coupling NR Limit Dirac Eq. ◆ Covariance E < 0 Solutions ◆ Solutions for the free particle Charge Conjugation Massless Spin 1/2 ◆ Minimal coupling ◆ Non relativistic limit and the Pauli equation ◆ Charge conjugation and antiparticles ◆ Massless spin 1/2 particles Jorge C. Rom˜ao IDPASC School Braga – 2 IST Summary ... Summary ❐ Part 2 – Quantum Field Theory (Two Lectures) Introduction Klein-Gordon Eq. ◆ QED as an example (Lecture 2) Dirac Equation Covariance Dirac Eq. ■ QED as a gauge theory Free Particle Solutions ■ Propagators and Green functions Minimal Coupling ■ NR Limit Dirac Eq. Feynman rules for QED E < 0 Solutions ■ Example 1: Compton scattering Charge Conjugation − + − + ■ Example 2: e + e µ + µ in QED Massless Spin 1/2 → ◆ Non Abelian Gauge Theories (NAGT) (Lecture 3) ■ Radiative corrections and renormalization ■ Non Abelian gauge theories: Classical theory ■ Non Abelian gauge theories: Quantization ■ Feynman rules for a NAGT ■ Example: Vacuum polarization in QCD Jorge C. Rom˜ao IDPASC School Braga – 3 IST Summary ... Summary ❐ Part 3 – The Standard Model (Lecture 4) Introduction Klein-Gordon Eq. ◆ Gauge group and particle content of the massless SM Dirac Equation Covariance Dirac Eq.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Miracles of General Relativity
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PhilSci Archive Two Miracles of General Relativity James Reada*, Harvey R. Browna†, and Dennis Lehmkuhlb‡ aFaculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Humanities, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; bEinstein Papers Project, Caltech M/C 20-7, 1200 East California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USA. Word count: 11474 Keywords: General relativity; equivalence principle; minimal coupling; dynamical perspective. Abstract We approach the physics of minimal coupling in general relativity, demonstrating that in certain circumstances this leads to (apparent) violations of the strong equivalence principle, which states (roughly) that, in general relativity, the dynamical laws of special relativity can be recovered at a point. We then assess the consequences of this result for the dynamical perspective on relativity, finding that potential difficulties presented by such apparent violations of the strong equivalence principle can be overcome. Next, we draw upon our discussion of the dynamical perspective in order to make explicit two ‘miracles’ in the foundations of relativity theory. We close by arguing that the above results afford us insights into the nature of special relativity, and its relation to general relativity. *[email protected] †[email protected] ‡[email protected] 1 Contents 1 Introduction3 2 Electromagnetism5 3 Minimal Coupling and the Equivalence Principle9 4 The Dynamical Perspective 13 5 Two Miracles of General Relativity 18 6 The Geometrical Perspective 21 7 Special Relativity 24 8 Conclusions and Outlook 26 A Minimal Coupling and Poincare´ Invariance 27 B Lorentz Symmetry Breaking 32 2 1 Introduction Recently, there has arisen a heightening of interest in the physics community in the cou- pling of Maxwell electrodynamics to Einstein gravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Gauge Fields
    3 CLASSICAL GAUGE FIELDS Introduction. The theory of “gauge fields” (sometimes called “compensating fields”1) is today universally recognized to constitute one of the supporting pillars of fundamental physics, but it came into the world not with a revolutionary bang but with a sickly whimper, and took a long time to find suitable employment. It sprang from the brow of the youthful Hermann Weyl (–), who is generally thought of as a mathematician, but for the seminal importance of his contributions to general relativity and quantum mechanics—and, more generally, to the “geometrization of physics”—must be counted among the greatest physicists of the 20th Century. Weyl’s initial motivation () was to loosen up the mathematical apparatus of general relativity2 just enough to find a natural dwelling place for electromagnetism. In Fritz London suggested that Weyl’s idea rested more naturally upon quantum mechanics (then fresh out of the egg!) than upon general relativity, and in Weyl published a revised elaboration of his original paper—the classic “Elektron und Gravitation” to which I have already referred.3 The influential Wolfgang Pauli became an ardent champion of the ideas put forward by Weyl, and it was via Pauli (whose “Wellenmechanik” article in the Handbuch der Physik () had made a profound impression upon him) that those ideas 1 See Section 21 in F. A. Kaempffer’s charmingly eccentric Concepts in Quantum Mechanics (). 2 Recall that Einstein’s theory of gravitation had been completed only in , and that its first observationial support was not forthcoming until . 3 The text, in English translation, can be found (together with historical commentary) in Lochlainn O’Raufeartaugh’s splendid The Dawning of Gauge Theory (), which should be consulted for a much more balanced account of events than I can present here.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Particles in a Magnetic Field
    6. Particles in a Magnetic Field The purpose of this chapter is to understand how quantum particles react to magnetic fields. In contrast to later sections, we will not yet place these particles inside solids, for the simple reason that there is plenty of interesting behaviour to discover before we do this. Later, in Section 4.1,wewillunderstandhowthesemagneticfieldsa↵ectthe electrons in solids. Before we get to describe quantum e↵ects, we first need to highlight a few of the more subtle aspects that arise when discussing classical physics in the presence of a magnetic field. 6.1 Gauge Fields Recall from our lectures on Electromagnetism that the electric field E(x,t)andmag- netic field B(x,t)canbewrittenintermsascalarpotentialφ(x,t) and a vector potential A(x,t), @A E = φ and B = A (6.1) r − @t r⇥ Both φ and A are referred to as gauge fields. When we first learn electromagnetism, they are introduced merely as handy tricks to help solve the Maxwell equations. However, as we proceed through theoretical physics, we learn that they play a more fundamental role. In particular, they are necessary if we want to discuss a Lagrangian or Hamiltonian approach to electromagnetism. We will soon see that these gauge fields are quite indispensable in quantum mechanics. The Lagrangian for a particle of charge q and mass m moving in a background electromagnetic fields is 1 L = mx˙ 2 + qx˙ A qφ (6.2) 2 · − The classical equation of motion arising from this Lagrangian is mx¨ = q (E + x˙ B) ⇥ This is the Lorentz force law.
    [Show full text]