MAPS 4 CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD

AGENDA

During the COVID-19 pandemic, no physical location will be provided for this meeting. The meeting will instead be live streamed from remote locations as allowed by SB 1031, 25 O.S. Supp. 2020 §307.1(C). Instructions on how to join the meeting can be found on the second page of this agenda.

Video Conference Meeting

10:30 AM March 4, 2021

BOARD MEMBERS: Teresa Rose Crook, Chairperson Russell Pace, Ward 1 Kevin Guarnera, Ward 5 Allie Shinn, Ward 2 Daisy Muñoz, Ward 6 Harry Black, Ward 3 Monique Bruner, Ward 7 Shay Morris, Ward 4 Bob Nelon, Vice-Chair, Ward 8 Brenda Hernández, At-Large Mark Stonecipher, Councilman Ward 8

David E. Todd, P.E., Program Manager

Dial 1-346-248-7799 (cell phone) Webinar URL: https://okc.zoom.us/j/95136723517 Toll Free: 1-888-475-4499 Webinar ID: 951 3672 3517 1-877-853-5257

ALL MEMBERS ATTENDING THE MEETING BY VIDEO CONFERENCE PARTICIPANT INSTRUCTIONS FOR VIDEO CONFERENCE MEETING

The City encourages participation in the public meeting from the residents of City. The City Council Chamber will be closed and the only alternative to participate in the meeting will be by Zoom/Prime.gov. Below are instructions on how to access to the meeting, request to speak on certain agenda items, and how to request to speak under Comments by Board, Staff and Citizens.

• To participate in the meeting via ZOOM, go to Webinar URL: https://okc.zoom.us/j/95136723517

• To participate in the meeting by cell phone, call 1-346-248-7799.

• To participate by land line toll free, call 1-888-475-4499 or 1-877-853-5257.

• When prompted, enter Webinar ID: 951 3672 3517

• To speak on a certain agenda item, please call or text your request in advance of the meeting to 405- 205-4195. Include your name, the agenda item number and the reason you would like to speak. Please submit your request prior to the beginning of the meeting to avoid receiving your request after your item has been considered. City staff will attempt to submit requests received during the meeting to process them to the meeting Chair.

• To speak under “Comments by Board, Staff and Citizens,” please call or text 405-205-4195; please list your name, address, phone number and the subject on which you wish to address the Board.

The Chair will announce at the beginning of the meeting that if connections are lost, the City will attempt to restore communications for a maximum of 15 minutes and if communications cannot be restored, the meeting will reconvene at a certain date, time and place.

If you are disconnected from the teleconference, please try again before calling or texting 405-205-4195.

INFORMATION ABOUT MAPS 4 CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD MEETINGS

The MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board meeting will be held via video conference. To confirm meeting dates, call (405) 297-3461.

It is the policy of the City to ensure that communications with participants and members of the public with disabilities are as effective as communications with others. Anyone with a disability who requires an accommodation, a modification of policies or procedures, or an auxiliary aid or server in order to participate in this meeting should contact the ADA department coordinator at 297-1531 or TDD 297- 2020 as soon as possible but not later than 48 hours (not including weekends or holidays) before the scheduled meeting. The department will give primary consideration to the choice of auxiliary aid or service requested by the individual with disability. If you need an alternate format of the agenda or any information provided at said meeting, please contact the ADA department coordinator listed above 48 hours prior to the scheduled meeting.

Addressing the Board

Citizens may address the Board on certain items by signing up to speak and providing the agenda item number and reason for appearing, but all comments must be relevant to the item. The Chair or presiding officer may in his or her discretion prohibit a person from addressing the Board, or have any person removed from the Council Chamber, if that person commits any disorderly or disruptive behavior, which includes without limitation any of the following: speaking without being recognized by the Chair or presiding officer; continuing to speak after notice that the speaker’s allotted time has expired; presenting comments or material not relevant to the item under discussion; failing to comply with the lawful instructions of the Chair or presiding officer; engaging in other conduct, activity or speech that delays, disrupts or interferes with the effective or timely conduct of the meeting. A person may also be subject to arrest and removal from the Municipal Building if he or she violates Oklahoma City Municipal Code 2020, § 30­81 – Disorderly conduct. If you know in advance that you wish to address the Board, you may call 297-3461 and provide your name and the subject about which you wish to speak. PLEASE LIMIT YOUR COMMENTS TO 3 MINUTES. Board Actions

Official action can be taken only on items that appear on the agenda. The Board may dispose of business on the agenda by adopting, approving, ratifying, denying, deferring or continuing resolutions, plans and specifications, addenda, amendments and contracts. Other actions may also be taken.

When more information is needed to act on an item, the Board may refer items to City staff. The Board may also refer items to subcommittees of the Board for additional study. Under certain circumstances, items are stricken from the agenda entirely or no action of any kind is taken. Television Coverage

Board meetings are covered live on Cox Cable Channel 20. For more information about the MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board, call 405-297-3461.

VIDEO CONFERENCE

MEETING

AGENDA

MAPS 4 CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD

MARCH 4, 2021

10:30 AM

Webinar URL: https://okc.zoom.us/j/95136723517

Webinar ID: 951 3672 3517

I. Call to Order

II. Approve Minutes of the February 4, 2021 MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board Meeting

III. MAPS 4 Revenue and Expenditure Report A. Receive the MAPS 4 Revenue and Expenditure Report Ending January 31, 2021 IV. Items for Individual Consideration A. Recommend approval of Request for proposals, Project M4­PR002, MAPS 4 Program Public Relations/Media Consultant V. Presentations A. Presentation on MAPS 4 Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium B. Presentation on MAPS 4 Project Advocate Meetings VI. Discussion Items

VII. Comments by Board, Staff, and Citizens

VIII. Adjournment

MAPS 4 CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD

MINUTES

February 4, 2021

BOARD MEMBERS:

Teresa Rose Crook, Chairperson

Russel Pace, Ward 1 Allie Shinn, Ward 2 Harry Black, Ward 3 Shay Morris, Ward 4 Kevin Guarnera, Ward 5 Daisy Munoz, Ward 6 Dr. Monique Bruner, Ward 7 Bob Nelon, Vice-Chairperson, Ward 8 Brenda Hernandez, At-Large Todd Stone, Councilman, Ward 4

David E. Todd, Program Manager

200 N. Walker ● 3rd Floor ● Council Chamber

MINUTES

MAPS 4 CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD

February 4, 2021

(The agenda was filed with the City Clerk at 1:28 p.m. on February 1, 2021.)

I. Call to Order. 10:32 a.m.

Chairperson Teresa Rose Crook called the meeting to order.

All members were present.

II. Approve Minutes of the January 7, 2021 MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board Meeting

APPROVED. Moved by Nelon, seconded by Guarnera. Ayes: Rose Crook, Pace, Black, Morris, Guarnera, Munoz, Bruner, Nelon, Hernandez, Stonecipher. Absent: Shinn.

III. MAPS 4 Revenue and Expenditure Report

A. Receive the MAPS 4 Revenue and Expenditure Report Ending December 31, 2020

RECEIVED. Moved by Pace, seconded by Bruner. Ayes: Rose Crook, Pace, Black, Morris, Guarnera, Munoz, Bruner, Nelon, Hernandez, Stonecipher. Abstain: Shinn.

IV. Presentations A. Presentation on MAPS 4 Oklahoma City Innovation District

Cathy O’Connor of the Alliance for Economic Development of Oklahoma City presented the power of innovation districts and community engagement. Katy Boren of the Oklahoma City Innovation District explained the advantages of the Innovation District project and presented the assets and plan. She stated there are four aspects of the project including Innovation Hall, the Henrietta B. Foster Center for Minority Small Business Development and Entrepreneurship, renovation of Booker T. Washington Park, and connections to Innovation Plaza. Ms. O’Connor explained the job growth strategies. She anticipated there could be a $1.2 billion annual economic impact. She stated $10 million would be budgeted for Innovation Hall, $15 million for the Henrietta B. Foster Center, $5 million for the Booker T. Washington Park, $25 million for connectivity and accessibility, and $21 for operations.

Page 2 Mr. Nelon asked who would own Innovation Hall and who would operate it since there are other funds included. Ms. O’Connor replied that was yet to be determined although the City or a City- related non-profit could own it although that was yet to be determined.

Dr. Bruner asked where the $10 million matching funds would come from. Ms. O’Connor responded the MAPS 4 resolution requires $10 million in matching funds be identified before the $10 million in MAPS 4 funds can be available to the project. She added the funds could come from a variety of sources although none of the funds has been identified.

Ms. Munoz asked if the project would be built on City-owned land. Ms. O’Connor stated the land shown on the renderings for Innovation Hall is privately owned; however, the City owns the Henrietta B. Foster Center.

B. Presentation on MAPS 4 Transit Plan

Jason Ferbrache of the Public Transportation and Parking Department presented the MAPS 4 Transit Plan and explained the background of how the project was included in MAPS 4. He noted approximately $60 million would be allocated for advanced transit. He explained the bus rapid transit system versus a fixed route system. He presented the two potential trip generators for the bus rapid transit system: one in the northeast of the City and one in the south. He explained the City doesn’t have any park-and-rides, so the plan is to include some in MAPS 4 on the fringe of the bus system. He remarked a micro transit plan is also planned to purchase some vehicles for a ride-sharing service in certain zones.

He presented the proposed enhanced bus system with a budget of $60 million, the enhanced bus system with a budget of $ $12.6 million, improved bus stops with a budget of $9.6 million, and planning and expansion with a budget of $5 million totaling $87.2 million for the entire project.

Mr. Stonecipher asked how many passengers would be allowed on the micro transit vehicle and inquired if people could use that to get to and from the airport. Mr. Ferbrache replied they were considering a vehicle for two to three passengers instead of a 15-passenger van that would serve areas that are not on a bus route, which includes the outer parts of the City. Mr. Black asked if the traffic signal priority system could be linked to an app that shows real time bus arrival times. Mr. Ferbrache responded that system is in use and that streetcar and bus arrival times are already online.

Dr. Bruner asked how many riders currently use the transit system. Mr. Ferbrache replied there are over three million passenger trips in a typical year; however, those are reduced currently because of the restrictions of allowing too many people on the busses. Dr. Bruner asked about the income he receives from the riders. Mr. Ferbrache answered approximately 10% of the costs are recovered from riders. Dr. Bruner asked if there is a plan to include other cities like Moore or Midwest City. Mr. Ferbrache replied there is a long-term plan for regional transportation, which is outside the scope of MAPS 4.

Ms. Munoz asked if people could be encouraged to use the bus system. Mr. Ferbrache responded he was hopeful the park-and-ride would make people want to utilize the bus system. Ms. Munoz wondered if the park-and-rides could make the Innovation District more accessible. Mr. Ferbrache agreed the northeast system could make the Innovation District more accessible.

Page 3

MAPS 4 MEMORANDUM Item No. III. A 3/4/2021 The City of OKLAHOMA CITY MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board

TO: Chairperson and Members

FROM: David E. Todd, P.E. Program Manager

Receive the MAPS 4 Revenue and Expenditure Report Ending January 31, 2021

Background: The MAPS 4 Revenue and Expenditure Report is attached for the period ending January 31, 2021. Staff will be available to respond to questions at the meeting.

Recommendation: Receive the report.

5 7 4 0 MAPS 4 REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES: for the period ending January 31, 2021

REVENUE: PROJECTED ACTUAL % +/- Previous Month Collections TOTAL Target 1 Sales Tax $ 978,000,000 $ 9,755,742 $ 66,107,547 $ 75,863,289 -7.8% Interest - 71,020 283,542 354,562 Other - - - - $ 978,000,000 $ 9,826,762 $ 66,391,089 76,217,851

1 The target is the percentage of actual versus projected revenue collected to date.

EXPENDITURES

Previous PROJECTED Month Expenditures TOTAL Neighborhoods $ 318,000,000 $ - $ 71,606 $ 71,606 Connectivity 204,000,000 - 45,936 45,936 Venues 215,000,000 - 48,412 48,412 Community 145,000,000 - 32,650 32,650 Innovation District 71,000,000 - 15,988 15,988 Civil Rights Center 25,000,000 - 5,630 5,630 $ 978,000,000 $ - $ 220,222 $ 220,222 MAPS 4 Agenda MEMORANDUM Item No. IV. A 3/4/2021 The City of OKLAHOMA CITY MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board

TO: Chairperson and Board Members

FROM: David E. Todd, P.E. Program Manager

Recommend approval of Request for proposals, Project M4-PR002, MAPS 4 Program Public Relations/Media Consultant.

Background: The City of Oklahoma City is soliciting a response for proposals for a qualified company to serve as the Public Relations and Media Consultant (PR/MC). The successful PR/MC will be responsible for the day-to-day needs of the MAPS Office with respect to the MAPS 4 program.

It is anticipated the PR/MC will provide the following services: program logo development, program graphics and color schemes, copy writing, digital and print newsletters, social media content, social media management, photographic and video services including drones, video services, public meeting coordination, project ribbon cutting coordination, project groundbreaking coordination, meeting attendance, and public representation.

Proposal Receipt Date: April 7, 2021 4:00:00 p.m.

Recommendation: Recommend approval.

5 7 4 2 (Published in the Journal Record March 17th , 2021)

NOTICE TO PROPOSERS

Notice is hereby given that the City of Oklahoma City will receive electronic proposals at the OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, 200 North Walker Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73102 until 4:00:00 p.m., on the 7th day of April, 2021, for the following:

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS PROJECT M4-PR002 MAPS 4 PROGRAM PUBLIC RELATIONS/MEDIA CONSULTANT

Pre-response Conference: A Pre-proposal Conference will be held on March 26, 2021 at 10:00 a.m. via Microsoft Teams. Please email [email protected] to register for the Microsoft Teams conference and to receive instructions about joining the conference.

The City of Oklahoma City and its Trusts have partnered with BidSync, Inc. to accept proposals electronically. You are invited to submit a proposal electronically through the BidSync system to supply the professional services, products, or systems specified in the electronic proposal packet. The City and its Trusts do not provide access to a computer to prepare electronic proposals or electronic proposal submission. Proposers must register with BidSync at https://www.bidsync.com/the-city-of-oklahoma-city in order to submit an electronic proposal. The City and its Trusts recommend potential proposers register and become familiar with the BidSync electronic proposal process in advance of submitting a proposal. There is no charge to the proposer for registering or submitting an electronic proposal to the Contracting Entity through BidSync. Instructions on how to get registered to propose through BidSync can be found on The City of Oklahoma City’s website at https://www.okc.gov/departments/bidding.

A copy of the City Guidelines and Procedures for Professional Consultant Selection may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk at the above referenced address. Proposals shall be made in accordance with the Notice to Proposers, General Instructions and Requirements for Proposers, Oklahoma Open Records Act and Confidential Information, and the RFP proposal packet, which are a part of the complete electronic proposal packet. A sample Non-Discrimination, Anti/Non-Collusion Affidavit and Vendor Registration form is attached for the Proposer’s reference and will be completed prior to contract approval. By submitting a proposal for services, the Proposer certifies that they, and any proposed subcontractors, are in compliance with 25 O.S. §1313 and participate in the status Verification System. The Status Verification System is defined in 25 O.S. §1312 and includes but is not limited to the free Employment Verification Program (E- Verify) through the Department of Homeland Security and available at www.dhs.gov/E-Verify.

The City and its Trusts reserve the right to waive formalities, irregularities and defects in any or all proposals, except as otherwise required by law. The City and its Trusts reserve the right to: reject any or all proposals; to reject a portion of any or all proposals; to negotiate and execute or to not negotiate or execute a Pricing Agreement/Contract with any proposer; and to solicit new or different proposals. The City and its Trusts reserve the right to negotiate and/or contract with one or more proposers for all or a portion of any proposal or proposed services.

Proposals timely received electronically through BidSync in the City Clerk's Office shall be forwarded to the Requesting Department for the Selection Committee to open and review. The BidSync system does not allow proposals to be submitted after the 4:00:00 p.m. deadline, on the above-mentioned date. There will be no exceptions to this policy. MAPS 4 Agenda MEMORANDUM Item No. V. A 3/4/2021 The City of OKLAHOMA CITY MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board

TO: Chairperson and Board Members

FROM: David E. Todd, P.E. Program Manager

Presentation on MAPS 4 Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium

Bob Funk Jr. will present the proposal for the MAPS 4 Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium project and will be available to answer questions.

1 2 7 8 3 A Place to Bring Us Together AMAPS4 Proposal for a Multi-Purpose Outdoor Venue Page 1 MAPS 4 APlace to Bring Us Together. MultipurposeOutdoor Stadium

okc.gov/maps4okc.gov/maps4 Overview

• Precedent of future-focused leadership Bob Funk, Jr. • City’s shifting preferences and demographics OKC Energy FC track with national trends • Multipurpose vision with diverse support • Avisionforthe present and future

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Past Becoming a BigLeague City

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Past – Becoming a Big League City

Transformational initiatives (1) drive civic and private investment from operators, (2)provide extraordinary return on investment, (3) boost surrounding areas, and (4) attract and retain talent.

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Present Successes and Gaps

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Present – Monumental Successes

MAPS has transformed our city’s reputation, perception and economic outlook and made us the envy of other cities around the country.

MAPS 3 Included Scissortail Park, OKC Streetcar, convention center, health and wellness centers, sidewalks,trails,Bennett Event Center, RIVERSPORT Rapids.

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Local Trends – Demographics

Growing Hispanic Population

Oklahoma City (City Oklahoma City Public Schools Limits) Enrollment Demographics — Demographics — 2017 2017

19.1% Hispanic YEAR

46.8% 53.2% Other Hispanic 2050 80.9% Other Oklahoma City predicted majority/minority change

Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey Source: Office of Educational Quality & Accountability Source: Greater Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce (ACS 2013-2017, 5-Year Estimates)

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Global Trends

3.4 Billion VIEWERS

2018 FIFAWorld Cup

160 Million VIEWERS

2018 Super Bowl

Source: Hollywood Reporter

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium National Trends

The fastest-growing sports in the are YEAR SOCCER, 2046 RUGBY Nationwide predicted AND majority/minority change LACROSSE

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Local Trends – Sports Sports and Soccer Fans

82% of Oklahomans 51% OKC are fans identify as sports or followers of soccer. fans.

18%

49% 51%

82%

Source: Nielsen, 2018 Source: Nielsen, 2018

The phrase Women’sWorld Cup watch party at “WORLD CUP” Together Square, July 7, 2019 was the most Googled term in in2018. Oklahoma Photo credit: The Oklahoman

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Local Support

Photo credit: The Oklahoman

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Present – Gaps & Opportunities

We’re Missing Out: OKC is the only top-50 market without an outdoor entertainment venue.

The OKC Energy FC is the only professional soccer team in North America playing at a high school venue on an undersized soccer pitch that does not meet the United States Soccer Federation’s standards.

Frisco, TX

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Present – Gaps & Opportunities

Missed Opportunities: • Local football games • Concerts and festivals • Big XII, NCAA, NAIA and soccer • JUCO • U.S. and U.S. Youth soccer • • College and club lacrosse. • International and club rugby NCAA DII football games • bowl • Esports • Drone racing. And so much more Kansas City

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Vision/ Future

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Vision

Multipurpose • Central location - accessible • Outdoor • Professional Sports • Rugby • Boxing • Lacrosse • Soccer

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Vision

Potential uses • HS football championships • Live concerts • Festivals • HS soccer championships • National soccer • exhibitions • Outdoor boxing location • Rugby championships • Lacrosse exhibitions and championships • X Games and similar events • Fireworks events • Fitness events and competitions Future home of OKC Energy FC

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Vision

Potential uses • HS football championships • Live concerts • Festivals • HS soccer championships • National soccer • exhibitions • Outdoor boxing location • Rugby championships • Lacrosse exhibitions and championships • X Games and similar events • Fireworks events • Fitness events and competitions Future home of OKC Energy FC

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Vision

Potential uses • HS football championships • Live concerts • Festivals • HS soccer championships • National soccer • exhibitions • Outdoor boxing location • Rugby championships • Lacrosse exhibitions and championships • X Games and similar events • Fireworks events • Fitness events and competitions Future home of OKC Energy FC

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Vision

Potential uses • HS football championships • Live concerts • Festivals • HS soccer championships • National soccer • exhibitions • Outdoor boxing location • Rugby championships • Lacrosse exhibitions and championships • X Games and similar events • Fireworks events • Fitness events and competitions Future home of OKC Energy FC

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Specifics

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Two Options

$37–42 million

$67–72 million

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Option One

Investment: $37–42 Million Seat Count: 8,000 Features: • Regulation-sized playing surface • Would accommodate youth through professional soccer, rugby and lacrosse • Venue would accommodate audiences for concerts and festivals. Anticipated annual economic impact: • 66 events • 509,536Attendance • $60,755,292 annual economic impact

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Option One

Investment: $37–42 Million Seat Count: 8,000 Features: • Regulation-sized playing surface • Would accommodate youth through professional soccer, rugby and lacrosse • Venue would accommodate audiences for concerts and festivals. Anticipated annual economic activity: • 66 events • 509,536Attendance • $60,755,292 annual economic impact

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Option Two

Investment: $67-72 Million Seat Count: 10,000 Features: • Shade structures • Air-conditioned suites • Larger stage • Secondary, more intimate stage • Restrooms for large concert events

Anticipated annual economic activity: • 81 events • 647,581 attendance • $79,445,520 annual economic impact

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Option Two

Investment: $67-72 Million Seat Count: 10,000 Features: • Shade structures • Air-conditioned suites • Larger stage • Secondary, more intimate stage • Restrooms for large concert events Anticipated annual economic activity: • 81 events • 647,581 attendance • $79,445,520 annual economic impact

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Option Two

Investment: $67-72 Million Seat Count: 10,000 Features: • Shade structures • Air-conditioned suites • Larger stage • Secondary, more intimate stage • Restrooms for large concert events Anticipated annual economic activity: • 81 events • 647,581 attendance • $79,445,520 annual economic impact

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Option Two

Investment: $67-72 Million Seat Count: 10,000 Features: • Shade structures • Air-conditioned suites • Larger stage • Secondary, more intimate stage • Restrooms for large concert events Anticipated annual economic activity: • 81 events • 647,581 attendance • $79,445,520 annual economic impact

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Option Two

Investment: $67-72 Million Seat Count: 10,000 Features: • Shade structures • Air-conditioned suites • Larger stage • Secondary, more intimate stage • Restrooms for large concert events Anticipated annual economic activity: • 81 events • 647,581 attendance • $79,445,520 annual economic impact

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Option Two

Investment: $67-72 Million Seat Count: 10,000 Features: • Shade structures • Air-conditioned suites • Larger stage • Secondary, more intimate stage • Restrooms for large concert events Anticipated annual economic activity: • 81 events • 647,581 attendance • $79,445,520 annual economic impact

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Summary/Differences

Either price point provides: $37–42 million • Multipurpose amenities • Expandable design to add seating capacity or additional shade structures

Differences: • 8,000 vs. 10,000 seated capacity • Restroom capacity to accommodate larger events • Capability to draw national touring entertainment $67–72 million

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Project Estimates

Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium - Option 1 Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium - Option 2

Hard Construction Cost Hard Construction Cost • Stadium site work & infrastructure $5,000,000 • Surface parking for 2,750 cars NI • Overflow grass berm seating (future expanded seats) $1,000,000 •Fully conditioned space C • Surface parking for 2,750 cars $6,875,000 $15,720,843• Semi-conditioned space (concessions, public restrooms) $3,020,000 • Fully conditioned space $20,409,679 • Concourses - open air $431, 800 •Semi-conditioned space (concessions, public restrooms) $3,020,000 • Concourses - covered $750,000 • Concourses - open air $893,600 • Seating bowl (concrete on-grade and alum. grandstands) $3,699,500 • Concourses - covered $1,350,000 • Roof canopies $750,000 • Seating bowl (all concrete and $5,285,000 Playing field & lighting $2,000,000 • Roofsteel) canopies $5,000,000 Subtotal Hard Construction Cost: $30,372,143 Playing field & $2,250,000 Soft Costs: Design Fees, Expenses, Surveys, Testing, etc lightingSubtotal Hard Construction Cost: $51,083,279 De$2,581,632sign & Construction $3,037,214 Soft Costs: Design Fees, Expenses, Surveys, Testing, etc $4,342,079 ContingFF&E &en Technologycy Design & Construction Contingency Es$3,037,214calation $911,1644 FF$5,108,328&E & $7,662,492 Total Project Cost $39,939,368 TechnologyEscalation $1,532,498 Excluding Parking Total Project Cost $69,728,675 Including Parking

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Long Term

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Step to a Larger Stage

United Soccer League (USL) Championship Division • OKC Energy FC’s league • Tier two • 36 teams, includingAustin, Louisville, San Antonio, Phoenix, Sacramento, and • Memphis Expected to grow to 40 teams Major League Soccer (MLS) • Tier one • 27 teams • Expected to continue expanding

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Summary

A Place to Bring Us Together. Multipurpose Outdoor Stadium Thank You

okc.gov/maps4okc.gov/maps4 MAPS 4 Agenda MEMORANDUM Item No. V. B 3/4/2021 The City of OKLAHOMA CITY MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board

TO: Chairperson and Board Members

FROM: David E. Todd, P.E. Program Manager

Presentation on MAPS 4 Project Advocate Meetings

Jason Cotton with ADG will present an update on the progress of the Project Advocate Meetings for the MAPS 4 projects as they relate to the Implementation Plan and will be available to respond to any questions at the meeting.

1 1 0 4 MAPS 4 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board Meeting 03.04.2021 Recap Work to Date • November 2020 to present • Project budget development • Project schedule development • Implementation plan preparation • Previous Communications to Board • January 2021: update regarding activities to date (project advocate meetings, plan development) • February 2021: introduction to implementation plan content and process • March 2021: project advocate meetings and key findings 2 Project Advocate Meetings

Goals and Objectives • Communication of information to the project advocate • Anticipated sequence of events • Anticipated schedule from now until adoption of Implementation Plan • Collection of more detailed information from the project advocate re: their project • Identification of advocate priorities within their project • Discussion of topics pertinent to the timing of the project within the larger program

3 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

Diversion Hub • Currently operating in a temporary 15,000-sq.ft. space at NE 10th Street and N. Robinson Avenue • New facility may need to be as much as 2x current space • Anticipated program for facility has changed slightly since Summer 2019 • Anticipated program elements: administrative, dietary and storage, family services, education and employment, probation offices, workspace for partner agencies • Proximity to OKC Police Headquarters, OKC Municipal Courts, and OK County Detention Center would be ideal • Other locations could also be feasible 4 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings Palomar Family Justice Center • Current facility is 80-years old with plumbing and electrical issues • Currently operating in approximately 29,000-sq.ft. of space • Contemplated program: approximately 80,000-sq.ft. • COVID has changed operations, more investment in I/T may be necessary • Palomar ready to move forward as soon as possible • mechanics of land transaction and parking garage construction will be key

5 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings Mental Health & Addiction • Crisis Intervention Centers • Existing OK County Crisis Intervention Center at 2625 General Pershing anticipated to serve as model • Goal of providing immediate needs for those who need stabilization • Restoration Center • Larger scale Crisis Center with focus on addiction • Proximity to Supportive Housing and public inebriate would be ideal • Supportive Housing • Single-room occupancy with sink and microwave • Place for those transitioning out of rehab or crisis centers • Future operators will likely depend on state and federal funding 6 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings Homelessness • Tier I: Permanent Supportive Housing • Focus on individuals actively experiencing homelessness • Key Aspect: On-Site Case Management • Majority of funds would be spent on new construction • Tier II: Public Housing Preservation • Goal of providing wrap-around case management services to all public housing • Could be renovation, redevelopment, or new construction • Tier III: Affordable Housing • Proximity to downtown OKC is preference • Location must provide opportunities for people to move up the economic ladder • Townhouses or multi-unit homes for rental • Mechanics of funding requests, funding approvals, and public reporting is key • M4 funding leveraged to create larger funding package (private, tax credits, other grants) 7 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings Freedom Center and Clara Luper Civil Rights Center • Freedom Center of OKC, LLC organized as 501(c)(3) in February 2020 • Operating entity for Freedom Center • Time needed to build necessary organizational capacity (3 to 4-years) • Have prepared Readiness Plan assuming funding would not occur during that period • Additional land will be required to construct facility • Portions of property currently owned by OCURA • Allowances will need to be made in schedule for land transactions

8 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

Innovation District • Innovation Hall • Part of larger development effort • Matching funds may come from TIF or other sources • HB Foster Center • Identifying and securing appropriately qualified operator seen as biggest challenge • Operator may be a consortium of organizations • Time needed in schedule to properly plan and program the facility • Programs in current facility will move to new Willa D Johnson Community Center • Connectivity • Surrounding neighborhoods • 10th Street and Harrison Street Bridges

9 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

Chesapeake • Age of Facility: 20-years, investment needed to keep up with peers in market • Operator: ASM • OKC Thunder: PBC • Completion of guest-facing components seen as first priority (e.g., NE Entry, Loud City Upgrades) • Practice Facility upgrades will need to be accomplished primarily across summer months • Management of Temporary Conditions will be key • Higher than normal concert and event traffic anticipated for 2022 and 2023 • NBA review and approval process anticipated 10 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings Multipurpose Stadium • Proximity to retail, dining, and other entertainment essential • Downtown location would be ideal • Hope that facility would be designed so that expansion could occur in future • United States Soccer Federation (USF) requirements must be met re: pitch dimensions and materials of construction • Costs associated with land acquisition and parking facility construction (2,750- cars) not included in current budget

11 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings Fairgrounds Coliseum • Ron Norick Arena: 54-years old and at end of serviceable lifespan • Phasing of project • Construction of new arena • Demolition and removal of Norick Arena • Construction of new Connector to Super Barn • Inclusion of Connector between Coliseum and Super Barn is critical from a programming perspective • Timing of $25M in Hotel Tax revenues is currently unknown • Design is currently underway (funded through MAPS 3)

12 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

Parks • Neighborhood and Community Parks ($63M) • Effort to be guided by January 2021 update to Parks Master Plan • Additional community input will be gathered • Dollars to be allocated across 107 parks based on needs and other park characteristics • Adult Soccer and Park Facilities ($29M) • Design of CB Cameron improvements currently in process, Phase I ($5M) funded by 2017 GO Bond • Improvements at South Lakes Park currently anticipated to include artificial turf, restroom facilities, and expanded parking facilities • River Improvements: • FTA grant has been awarded for boat landing • Improvements to river bank and river-adjacent public land associated with a tract of land near Western Ave bridge (OCRRA) • Coordination with Chickasaw Nation required for improvements in vicinity of FAM 13 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings Sidewalks, Bike Lanes, Trails, and Streetlights • Update to BikeWalkOKC currently in process (complete Summer 2021) • Update will acknowledge additional funding made available from MAPS 4 • Priorities for sidewalks, bike lanes, and trails will be guided by OKC Planning • Input required prior to development of work packages / phases • Trees, art, and sustainable design elements will need to be considered within the context of maintenance responsibilities • Streetlight improvements anticipated to be completed by utility provider, OKC will prioritize and identify high-need areas

14 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

Transit • Higher priorities within $87M package • Land Acquisition ($2M) • Planning Updates ($3M) • Bus stop improvements ($10M) • NE and South BRT • time needed for route planning and establishment of operational funding • Projects should be assembled assuming no federal grants will be involved • Park and Ride: need for facilities adjacent to NW BRT (design currently 30% complete) • Enhanced Bus Service: majority of bus procurement not needed until 2023 or 2024

15 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

Youth Centers • Possibility of locating facilities within existing OKC Parks • OKC Play recommendations from Summer 2018 • Land acquisition costs minimized • Handful of potential operators including OKC Parks • Competitive operator selection process currently anticipated • Program may include food pantry and preparation area, clothing closet, counseling (via non-profit partner agencies), gym, and gaming areas

16 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

Senior Wellness Centers • Senior Wellness Center No. 5 anticipated to be located in near NW Oklahoma City • Approach anticipated to be very similar to MAPS 3 process • Competitive operator selection process • Will be informed by programs, budgets, and lessons learned on MAPS 3 Wellness Centers • Operating fund ($15M) will provide assistance for low-income seniors to utilize the MAPS 3 and MAPS 4 senior wellness centers • Guidelines created to prioritize the sustainment of wellness centers located in geographic areas with predominantly lower-income populations • Mechanics of funding requests to MAPS 4 Trust still being developed 17 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

Beautification • Additional staffing anticipated to be first priority – will be funded by Operation/Maintenance Fund ($5M) • Anticipated that all work listed in resolution will be complete in conjunction with program • Due to funding limitations, project scopes will likely be less extensive than typical streetscape-like projects • Subcommittee input will be required to set priorities and guide process re: • City entrance gateways along interstates • Public art and/or monuments at key intersections around City • Low maintenance landscaping along key arterials • trees 18 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

Animal Shelter • Construction of new shelter anticipated to be immediately adjacent to existing facility (2811 SE 29th St) • Facilities located on property or adjacent to existing shelter • OKC Police Department impound • Human Society • Pet Cemetery • Barns and Pens • Budget informed by peer facilities from across country • Proposed budget appears to be more than adequate for anticipated project

19 MAPS 4 Project Advocate Meetings: Key Findings

MAPS 4 Citizens Advisory Board Meeting 03.04.2021