DOCSLIB.ORG

Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory BAUMAN MOSCOW STATE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY Physical Department & United Physical Society of Russia Russian Gravitational Society British Society for the Philosophy of Science Liverpool University, Great Britain S.C.&T., University of Sunderland, Great Britain Physical Interpretations of Relativity Theory Proceedings of International Scientific Meeting PIRT-2003 Moscow: 30 June – 03 July, 2003 Edited by M.C. Duffy, V.O. Gladyshev, A.N. Morozov Moscow, Liverpool, Sunderland ISBN-5-89344-006-4 Physical Interpretation of Relativity Theory: Proceedings of International Meeting. Moscow, 30 June – 3 July 2003. – Moscow, Liverpool, Suderland, 2003. -370p. This volume contains papers which accepted for inclusion in the programme of lectures of meeting “Physical Interpretation of Relativity Theory” which is organized by the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, School of Computing and Technology, University of Sunderland, Liverpool University and British Society for Philosophy of Science. The most important single objective of the meeting in Summer 2003 is including the advantages of the various physical, geometrical and mathematical interpretations of the formal structure of Relativity Theory; and to examine the philosophical, historical and epistemological questions associated with the various interpretations of the accepted mathematical expression of the Relativity Principle and its development. The conference is called to examine the various interpretations of the (mathematical) formal structure of Relativity Theory, and the several kinds of physical and mathematical models which accompany these interpretations. The programme timetable, giving authors and titles of papers as presented and other details of the Moscow Meeting “Physical Interpretation of Relativity Theory” are given on the web site maintained by the Bauman Moscow State Technical University http://fn.bmstu.ru/phys/nov/konf/pirt/pirt_main.html. The meeting is intended to be of interest to physicists, mathematicians, engineers, philosophers and historians of science, post-graduate students. The conference is sponsored and supported by the Bauman Moscow State Technical University Physical Department Lomonosov Moscow State University United Physical Society of Russia Russian Gravitational Society British Society for the Philosophy of Science Liverpool University, Great Britain University of Sunderland, Great Britain School of Computing, and Technology Contents Melnikov V.N. Three problems of the Big G . 6 Pervushin V.N., Proskurin D.V., Zinchuk V.A., Zorin A.G. General Relativity as a Conformal Theory . 12 Rowlands P. From Zero to the Dirac State . 13 Kassandrov V.V. Nature of time and particles-caustics: physical world in the framework of algebrodynamics and twistor concept of R.Penrose . 23 Mayburov A. Fuzzy Space-time Geometry as approach to nonrelativistic quantization . 34 Siparov S.V. Gravitational wave’s action on the atom of a cosmic maser . 35 Zakirov U. Dynamic stability of concentrated variable mass in a gravitational field of a charged radiative field . 45 Gorelik V.S. Polaritons and analogical excitations of media and physical vacuum . 56 Levin S.F. Identification of interpreting models in General Relativity and Cosmology . 72 Vargashkin V. The phenomenon of gravitational self-lensing . 82 Misnik V.P., Sergievski A.N. Method of adaptive model creation for determining space object motion . 91 Chervon S.V. Cosmological models of global Universe evolution: from post-planckian epoch till present times . 99 Baburova O.V. Singularity-free accelerating Universe with dilation dark matter . 103 + - Dmitriyev V.P. Mechanical scenario for the reaction n → p + e + ν% . 104 Duffy M.C. Geometrized space-time & the world-ether . 108 Gladyshev V.O., Gladysheva T.M., Zubarev V.Ye. Description of electromagnetic radiation in complex motion media with account of the relativistic effects . 112 Koryukin V.M. The state of the weakly interacting particles of the Universe and the Einstein gravitational equations . 122 Konstantinov M.Yu. Causality properties of some of space-time models . 126 Trell E. String and loop quantum gravity theories unified in Platonic Ether with proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem and Beal’s Conjecture . 134 Golovashkin A.I., Izmailov G.N., Kuleshova G.A., Tskhovrebov A.M. Interferometric registration methods of weak gravitational waves and a reversible calculation problem . 150 Petrova L.I. Formation of physical fields and manifolds . 161 Myasnikov E.N., Myasnikova A.E. Quasirelativistic and quasiquantum kinematics of charges (velocities about the velocity of sound) in classic electrodynamics of continuous media . 168 Golubyatnikov A.N. Gravitation as Mass Exchange . 172 3 Gertsenshtein M.Ye. About Singularity in General Relativity . 176 Kholmetskii A.L. The Lorentz non-invariance of the Faraday induction law . 180 Rivera Rebolledo Jose M. Caltenco J.H., Lopez-Bonilla J.L., Pena-Rivero R. Landau- Lifshits energy-momentum pseudotensor for metrics with spherical symmetry . 188 Khokhlov D.L. The special relativity reinterpreted in view of the quantum mechanics . 192 Tarasov V.A., Gerasimov Yu.V., Baskakov V.D., Korolev A.N. Identification of structured systems and physical objects by using radio-wave method . 196 Bronnikov K.A., Sibileva E.N., Shikin G.N. Nonlinear self-gravitating spinor field: cosmic string-like configurations . 199 Korotaev S.M., Morozov A.N., Serdyuk V.O, Gorohov J.V. Experimental evidence of nonlocal transaction in reverse time . 200 Frolov B.N. On the physical field generated by rotating masses in Poincare-gauge theory of gravity . 213 Averin A.P. On invariance in relativistic thermodynamics . 220 Katanaev M.O. On the energy problem in gravity . 223 Fil'chenkov M.L., Cherny G.P. Quantum Cosmology Revisited . 223 Sankar Hajra. Nature of electric and magnetic fields at the vicinity of the Earth’s surface . 224 Mychelkin E. Geometrized scalar gravity as a new physical paradigm . 239 Zaripov R.G. Clock Synchronization and Finsler Structure of a Flat Anisotropic Space-time . 241 Musienko A.I. Relativistic analogies in the classical mechanics . 249 Konstantinov M.Yu. Problem of space-time structure description in microcosm . 258 Golub' Yu.Ya. Computer simulation of the gravitational interaction in binary systems . 267 Bobrov M.A., Yurasov N.I. The Bohr’s solution of quantum relativistic problem for Moon- Earth system . 271 Vichniakova S., Vichniakov V. On the fermion motion in the gravitational field of masses distributed uniformly . 273 Kupavtsev A.V. SRT and Current Education . 277 Litvinov O.S., Ivanov V.E. Phase problem algoritms solution application to the determination of the gravitation fields phase structure . 281 Amrit Sorli. Gravitational ether as the origin of the Universe and life . 282 Baranov A.M., Tegai S.F. On radiating star subsurface . 287 Carezani R.L. Extra gravitational tug . 292 Carezani R.L. Graviton velocity and gravity speed . 295 4 Carezani R.L. The Principle of Equivalence . 298 Zubarev V.E., Sal’nikov Yu.V., Podguzov G.V. Interferometer for controlling flat surfaces for precise optical experiments . 300 Podguzov G.V., Sal’nikov Yu.V. Methods of increasing efficiency of impulse laser for high- accuracy navigation systems . 300 Gavrilina E.V., Podguzov G.V., Sal’nikov Yu.V. Automating control of aspherical optics for space-location systems . 301 Gershansky V.F. Philosophical aspects of Relativity Theory . 302 Golosov D.A., Yurasov N.I. STR and boundary of the Mendeleev’s periodic system stability . 311 Gong Bing Xin. The uncertainty principle is untenable . 313 Keswani Gope H. Fizeau experiment, Aberration and Relativity . 316 Kholmetskii A.L. Remarks about the energy flux and momentum of electromagnetic field . 323 Kuvshinova E.V., Panov V.F. Cosmological models with rotation . 331 Marmet P. Anomalous Acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11 . 334 Minasyan L.A. Phylosophical Aspects of Geometrical Physics . 338 Pavlov D.G. Finsler alternative of flat space-time . 340 Suresh Chandra Tiwari. Faster-than-light Signals: Myth or Reality? . 347 Shestakova T.P. Could gauge degrees of freedom play the role of environment in ‘extended phase space’ version of quantum geometrodynamics? . 350 Urusovskii I.A. Gravity as a projection of the cosmological force . 359 Uspenskii G.R. Interpretation of the distance paradox for the spacecraft “Pioner-10” on the base of the anomalous gravitational effects . 368 Vichniakova S., Vichniakov V. On the mass concept in the Physics study course . 369 5 THREE PROBLEMS OF BIG G V.N. MELNIKOV Centre for Gravitation and Fundamental Metrology, VNIIMS and Institute of Gravitation and Cosmology, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia 3-1 M.Ulyanovoy Street, Moscow 119313, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Main problems of modern physics and of absolute G measurements, its temporal and range variations from both experimental and theoretical points of view are discussed, and a new next generation multipurpose space project for measuring G, G(r) and G- dot promising an improvement of our knowledge of these quantities by 2-4 orders is advocated. 1 Introduction If earlier the main trend in physics was the study of different physical interactions - gravita- tional, electromagnetic, strong and week ones, after 60's and especially during last decades we see the outbreak of investigations along the unification of all four known interactions. This is due mainly to problems related to the gravitational interaction: its quantization, singularities, early universe description etc. We have now a good model unifying
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Gravitational Lens Effect of Galaxies and Black Holes
    .f .(-L THE GRAVITATIONAL LENS EFFECT of GALAXIES and BLACK HOLES by Igor Bray, B.Sc. (Hons.) A thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of lr{athematical Physics The University of Adelaide South Australia January 1986 Awo.c(sd rt,zb to rny wife Ann CONTENTS STATEMENT ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS lt ABSTRACT lll PART I Spheroidal Gravitational Lenses I Introduction 1.1 Spherical gravitational lenses I 1.2 Spheroidal gravitational lenses 12 2 Derivationof I("o). ......16 3 Numerical Investigation 3.1 Evaluations oI l(zs) 27 3.2 Numericaltechniques 38 3.3 Numerical results 4L PART II Kerr Black llole As A Gravitational Lens 4 Introduction 4.1 Geodesics in the Kerr space-time 60 4.2 The equations of motion 64 5 Solving the Equations of Motion 5.1 Solution for 0 in the case m - a'= 0 68 5.2 Solution for / in the case m: a = O 76 5.3 Relating À and 7 to the position of the ìmage .. .. .82 5.4 Solution for 0 ... 89 5.5 Solution for / 104 5.6 Solution for ú. .. ..109 5.7 Quality of the approximations 115 6 Numerical investigation . .. ... tt7 References 122 STATEMENT This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any degree, and to the best of my knowledge and belief, contains no material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. The author consents to the thesis being made available for photocopying and loan if applicable if accepted for the award of the degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Spacetimes with Singularities Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica
    Spacetimes with Singularities Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica To cite this version: Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica. Spacetimes with Singularities. An. Stiint. Univ. Ovidius Constanta, Ser. Mat., 2012, pp.26. hal-00617027v2 HAL Id: hal-00617027 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00617027v2 Submitted on 30 Nov 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Spacetimes with Singularities ∗†‡ Ovidiu-Cristinel Stoica Abstract We report on some advances made in the problem of singularities in general relativity. First is introduced the singular semi-Riemannian geometry for met- rics which can change their signature (in particular be degenerate). The standard operations like covariant contraction, covariant derivative, and constructions like the Riemann curvature are usually prohibited by the fact that the metric is not invertible. The things become even worse at the points where the signature changes. We show that we can still do many of these operations, in a different framework which we propose. This allows the writing of an equivalent form of Einstein’s equation, which works for degenerate metric too. Once we make the singularities manageable from mathematical view- point, we can extend analytically the black hole solutions and then choose from the maximal extensions globally hyperbolic regions.
    [Show full text]
  • No Sign of Gravitational Lensing in the Cosmic Microwave Background
    Perspectives No sign of gravitational lensing in the ., WFPC2, HST, NASA ., WFPC2, HST, cosmic microwave et al background Ron Samec ravitational lensing is a Ggravitational-optical effect whereby a background object like a distant quasar is magnified, distorted Andrew Fruchter (STScI) Image by and brightened by a foreground galaxy. It is alleged that the cluster of galaxies Abell 2218, distorts and magnifies It is one of the consequences of general light from galaxies behind it. relativity and is so well understood that fectly smooth black body spectrum of sioned by Hoyle and Wickramasinghe it now appears in standard optics text 5,6 books. Objects that are too far to be 2.725 K with very tiny fluctuations in and by Hartnett. They showed that seen are ‘focused’ by an intervening the pattern on the 70 μK level. These a homogeneous cloud mixture of car- concentration of matter and bought ‘bumps’ or patterns in the CMB are bon/silicate dust and iron or carbon into view to the earth based astronomer. supposedly the ‘seeds’ from which whiskers could produce such a back- One of the most interesting photos of the galaxies formed. Why is it so ground radiation. If the CMB is not the effects of gravitational lensing smooth? Alan Guth ‘solved’ this puz- of cosmological origin, all the ad hoc ideas that have been added to support is shown in the HST image of Abell zle by postulating that the universe was the big bang theory (like inflation) 2218 by Andrew Fruchter1 (Space originally a very tiny entity in thermal fall apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalizations of the Kerr-Newman Solution
    Generalizations of the Kerr-Newman solution Contents 1 Topics 1035 1.1 ICRANetParticipants. 1035 1.2 Ongoingcollaborations. 1035 1.3 Students ............................... 1035 2 Brief description 1037 3 Introduction 1039 4 Thegeneralstaticvacuumsolution 1041 4.1 Line element and field equations . 1041 4.2 Staticsolution ............................ 1043 5 Stationary generalization 1045 5.1 Ernst representation . 1045 5.2 Representation as a nonlinear sigma model . 1046 5.3 Representation as a generalized harmonic map . 1048 5.4 Dimensional extension . 1052 5.5 Thegeneralsolution . 1055 6 Tidal indicators in the spacetime of a rotating deformed mass 1059 6.1 Introduction ............................. 1059 6.2 The gravitational field of a rotating deformed mass . 1060 6.2.1 Limitingcases. 1062 6.3 Circularorbitsonthesymmetryplane . 1064 6.4 Tidalindicators ........................... 1065 6.4.1 Super-energy density and super-Poynting vector . 1067 6.4.2 Discussion.......................... 1068 6.4.3 Limit of slow rotation and small deformation . 1069 6.5 Multipole moments, tidal Love numbers and Post-Newtonian theory................................. 1076 6.6 Concludingremarks . 1077 7 Neutrino oscillations in the field of a rotating deformed mass 1081 7.1 Introduction ............................. 1081 7.2 Stationary axisymmetric spacetimes and neutrino oscillation . 1082 7.2.1 Geodesics .......................... 1083 1033 Contents 7.2.2 Neutrinooscillations . 1084 7.3 Neutrino oscillations in the Hartle-Thorne metric . 1085 7.4 Concludingremarks . 1088 8 Gravitational field of compact objects in general relativity 1091 8.1 Introduction ............................. 1091 8.2 The Hartle-Thorne metrics . 1094 8.2.1 The interior solution . 1094 8.2.2 The Exterior Solution . 1096 8.3 The Fock’s approach . 1097 8.3.1 The interior solution .
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Lensing in a Black-Bounce Traversable Wormhole
    Gravitational lensing in black-bounce spacetimes J. R. Nascimento,1, ∗ A. Yu. Petrov,1, y P. J. Porf´ırio,1, z and A. R. Soares1, x 1Departamento de F´ısica, Universidade Federal da Para´ıba, Caixa Postal 5008, 58051-970, Jo~aoPessoa, Para´ıba, Brazil In this work, we calculate the deflection angle of light in a spacetime that interpolates between regular black holes and traversable wormholes, depending on the free parameter of the metric. Afterwards, this angular deflection is substituted into the lens equations which allows to obtain physically measurable results, such as the position of the relativistic images and the magnifications. I. INTRODUCTION The angular deflection of light when passing through a gravitational field was one of the first predictions of the General Relativity (GR). Its confirmation played a role of a milestone for GR being one of the most important tests for it [1,2]. Then, gravitational lenses have become an important research tool in astrophysics and cosmology [3,4], allowing studies of the distribution of structures [5,6], dark matter [7] and some other topics [8{15]. Like as in the works cited earlier, the prediction made by Einstein was developed in the weak field approximation, that is, when the light ray passes at very large distance from the source which generates the gravitational lens. Under the phenomenological point of view, the recent discovery of gravitational waves by the LIGO-Virgo collaboration [16{18] opened up a new route of research, that is, to explore new cosmological observations by probing the Universe with gravitational waves, in particular, studying effects of gravitational lensing in the weak field approximation (see e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Singularities, Black Holes, and Cosmic Censorship: a Tribute to Roger Penrose
    Foundations of Physics (2021) 51:42 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-021-00432-1 INVITED REVIEW Singularities, Black Holes, and Cosmic Censorship: A Tribute to Roger Penrose Klaas Landsman1 Received: 8 January 2021 / Accepted: 25 January 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract In the light of his recent (and fully deserved) Nobel Prize, this pedagogical paper draws attention to a fundamental tension that drove Penrose’s work on general rela- tivity. His 1965 singularity theorem (for which he got the prize) does not in fact imply the existence of black holes (even if its assumptions are met). Similarly, his versatile defnition of a singular space–time does not match the generally accepted defnition of a black hole (derived from his concept of null infnity). To overcome this, Penrose launched his cosmic censorship conjecture(s), whose evolution we discuss. In particular, we review both his own (mature) formulation and its later, inequivalent reformulation in the PDE literature. As a compromise, one might say that in “generic” or “physically reasonable” space–times, weak cosmic censorship postulates the appearance and stability of event horizons, whereas strong cosmic censorship asks for the instability and ensuing disappearance of Cauchy horizons. As an encore, an “Appendix” by Erik Curiel reviews the early history of the defni- tion of a black hole. Keywords General relativity · Roger Penrose · Black holes · Ccosmic censorship * Klaas Landsman [email protected] 1 Department of Mathematics, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Vol.:(0123456789)1 3 42 Page 2 of 38 Foundations of Physics (2021) 51:42 Conformal diagram [146, p. 208, Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalizations of the Kerr-Newman Solution
    Generalizations of the Kerr-Newman solution Contents 1 Topics 663 1.1 ICRANetParticipants. 663 1.2 Ongoingcollaborations. 663 1.3 Students ............................... 663 2 Brief description 665 3 Introduction 667 4 Thegeneralstaticvacuumsolution 669 4.1 Line element and field equations . 669 4.2 Staticsolution ............................ 671 5 Stationary generalization 673 5.1 Ernst representation . 673 5.2 Representation as a nonlinear sigma model . 674 5.3 Representation as a generalized harmonic map . 676 5.4 Dimensional extension . 680 5.5 Thegeneralsolution ........................ 683 6 Static and slowly rotating stars in the weak-field approximation 687 6.1 Introduction ............................. 687 6.2 Slowly rotating stars in Newtonian gravity . 689 6.2.1 Coordinates ......................... 690 6.2.2 Spherical harmonics . 692 6.3 Physical properties of the model . 694 6.3.1 Mass and Central Density . 695 6.3.2 The Shape of the Star and Numerical Integration . 697 6.3.3 Ellipticity .......................... 699 6.3.4 Quadrupole Moment . 700 6.3.5 MomentofInertia . 700 6.4 Summary............................... 701 6.4.1 Thestaticcase........................ 702 6.4.2 The rotating case: l = 0Equations ............ 702 6.4.3 The rotating case: l = 2Equations ............ 703 6.5 Anexample:Whitedwarfs. 704 6.6 Conclusions ............................. 708 659 Contents 7 PropertiesoftheergoregionintheKerrspacetime 711 7.1 Introduction ............................. 711 7.2 Generalproperties ......................... 712 7.2.1 The black hole case (0 < a < M) ............. 713 7.2.2 The extreme black hole case (a = M) .......... 714 7.2.3 The naked singularity case (a > M) ........... 714 7.2.4 The equatorial plane . 714 7.2.5 Symmetries and Killing vectors . 715 7.2.6 The energetic inside the Kerr ergoregion .
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Lensing and Optical Geometry • Marcus C
    Gravitational Lensing and OpticalGravitational Geometry • Marcus C. Werner Gravitational Lensing and Optical Geometry A Centennial Perspective Edited by Marcus C. Werner Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Universe www.mdpi.com/journal/universe Gravitational Lensing and Optical Geometry Gravitational Lensing and Optical Geometry: A Centennial Perspective Editor Marcus C. Werner MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Editor Marcus C. Werner Duke Kunshan University China Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Universe (ISSN 2218-1997) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/universe/special issues/ gravitational lensing optical geometry). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03943-286-8 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03943-287-5 (PDF) c 2020 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Editor .............................................. vii Preface to ”Gravitational Lensing and Optical Geometry: A Centennial Perspective” ..... ix Amir B.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein, History, and Other Passions : the Rebellion Against Science at the End of the Twentieth Century
    Einstein, history, and other passions : the rebellion against science at the end of the twentieth century The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Holton, Gerald James. 2000. Einstein, history, and other passions : the rebellion against science at the end of the twentieth century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Published Version http://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674004337 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:23975375 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA EINSTEIN, HISTORY, ANDOTHER PASSIONS ;/S*6 ? ? / ? L EINSTEIN, HISTORY, ANDOTHER PASSIONS E?3^ 0/" Cf72fM?y GERALD HOLTON A HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS C%772^r?<%gf, AizziMc^zzyeZZy LozzJozz, E?zg/%??J Q AOOO Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book and Addison-Wesley was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed in capital letters. PHYSICS RESEARCH LIBRARY NOV 0 4 1008 Copyright @ 1996 by Gerald Holton All rights reserved HARVARD UNIVERSITY Printed in the United States of America An earlier version of this book was published by the American Institute of Physics Press in 1995. First Harvard University Press paperback edition, 2000 o/ CoMgre.w C%t%/og;Hg-zM-PMMt'%tz'c7t Dzztzz Holton, Gerald James.
    [Show full text]
  • PHY390, the Kerr Metric and Black Holes
    PHY390, The Kerr Metric and Black Holes James Lattimer Department of Physics & Astronomy 449 ESS Bldg. Stony Brook University April 1, 2021 Black Holes, Neutron Stars and Gravitational Radiation [email protected] James Lattimer PHY390, The Kerr Metric and Black Holes What Exactly is a Black Hole? Standard definition: A region of space from which nothing, not even light, can escape. I Where does the escape velocity equal the speed of light? r 2GMBH vesc = = c RSch This defines the Schwarzschild radius RSch to be 2GMBH M RSch = 2 ' 3 km c M I The event horizon marks the point of no return for any object. I A black hole is black because it absorbs everything incident on the event horizon and reflects nothing. I Black holes are hypothesized to form in three ways: I Gravitational collapse of a star I A high energy collision I Density fluctuations in the early universe I In general relativity, the black hole's mass is concentrated at the center in a singularity of infinite density. James Lattimer PHY390, The Kerr Metric and Black Holes John Michell and Black Holes The first reference is by the Anglican priest, John Michell (1724-1793), in a letter written to Henry Cavendish, of the Royal Society, in 1783. He reasoned, from observations of radiation pressure, that light, like mass, has inertia. If gravity affects light like its mass equivalent, light would be weakened. He argued that a Sun with 500 times its radius and the same density would be so massive that it's escape velocity would exceed light speed.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Gravitational Lensing by Schwarzschild Black Holes
    STRONG GRAVITATIONAL LENSING BY SCHWARZSCHILD BLACK HOLES G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan1,2,3 and O. Yu. Tsupko1,3 The properties of the relativistic rings which show up in images of a source when a black hole lies between the source and observer are examined. The impact parameters are calculated, along with the distances of closest approach of the rays which form a relativistic ring, their angular sizes, and their "magnification" factors, which are much less than unity. Keywords: strong gravitational lensing: Schwarzschild black hole 1. Introduction One of the basic approximations in the theory of gravitational lensing [1, 2] is the approximation of weak lensing, i.e., small deflection angles. In the case of Schwarzschild lensing by a point mass, this approximation means that the impact parameters for incident photons are much greater than the Schwarzschild radius of the lensing system. In most astrophysical situations involving gravitational lensing, the weak lensing condition is well satisfied and it is possible to limit oneself to that case. In some cases, however, strong lensing effects and those associated with large deflection angles are of interest. Some effects associated with taking the motion of photons near the gravitational radius of a black hole into account, have been discussed before [3, 4]. An explicit analytic expression for the deflection angle in a Schwarzschild metric have been derived in the strong field limit [5, 6]. In this paper we investigate effects arising from the strong distortion of isotropic radiation from a star by the gravitational field of a black hole. (1) Space Research Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] (2) Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia (3) Moscow Engineering Physics Institute, Moscow, Russia; e-mail: [email protected] 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Structures in the Dynamics of Kerr Black Holes
    Complex structures in the dynamics of Kerr black holes Ben Maybee [email protected] Higgs Centre for Theoretical Physics, The University of Edinburgh YTF 20, e-Durham In a certain film… Help! I need to precisely scatter off a spinning black hole and reach a life supporting planet… Spinning black holes are very special…maybe some insight will simplify things? Christopher Nolan and Warner Bros Pictures, 2013 In a certain film… Okay, you’re good with spin; what should I try? Black holes are easy; the spin vector 푎휇 determines all multipoles. Try using the Newman- Janis shift… Hansen, 1974 Outline 1. The Newman-Janis shift 2. Kerr black holes as elementary particles? 3. Effective actions and complex worldsheets 4. Spinor equations of motion 5. Discussion The Newman-Janis shift Simple statement: Kerr metric, with spin parameter 푎, can be Newman & obtained from Schwarzschild by complex Janis, 1965 transformation 푧 → 푧 + 푖푎 Kerr and Schwarzschild are both exact Kerr-Schild solutions to GR: Kerr & Schild, 1965 Background metric Null vector, Scalar function Classical double copy: ∃ gauge theory solution Monteiro, O’Connell & White, 2014 → EM analogue of Kerr: Kerr! The Newman-Janis shift Metrics: Under 푧 → 푧 + 푖푎, 푟2 → 푟ǁ + 푖푎 cos 휃 2. Why did that just happen??? Scattering amplitudes and spin No hair theorem → all black hole multipoles specified by Hansen, 1974 mass and spin vector. Wigner classification → single particle Wigner, states specified by mass and spin s. 1939 Little group irreps Any state in a little group irrep can be represented using chiral spinor- helicity variables: Distinct spinor reps Arkani-Hamed, Huang & Huang, 2017 Little group metric Massless: 푈(1) → 훿푖푗 2-spinors Massive: 푆푈 2 → 휖푗푖 3-point exponentiation Use to calculate amplitudes for any spin s: Chiral Spin = parameter e.g.
    [Show full text]