Proquest Dissertations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proquest Dissertations "Fairness and Balance?": The Politics of Ontario's Labour Relations Regime, 1949-1963 Charles W. Smith A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Programme in Political Science York University Toronto, Ontario June 2009 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-54108-1 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-54108-1 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis. cette these. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. 1*1 Canada "Fairness and Balance?": The Politics of Ontario's Labour Relations Regime, 1949-1963 By Charles Smith a dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of York University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY © 2009 Permission has been granted to: a) YORK UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES to lend or sell copies of this dissertation in paper, microform or electronic formats, and b) LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES CANADA to reproduce, lend, distribute, or sell copies of this dissertation anywhere in the world in microform, paper or electronic formats and to authorize or procure the reproduction, loan, distribution or sale of copies of this dissertation anywhere in the world in micro­ form, paper or electronic formats. The author reserves other publication rights, and neither the dissertation nor extensive extracts from it may be printed or otherwise reproduced without the author's written permission. IV Abstract This thesis explores the creation and administration of the Ontario Labour Relations Act (OLRA) and the Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB) between 1949 and 1963. In so doing, it examines the role played by business and organized labour in shaping labour relations in post-war Ontario. The thesis challenges conventional arguments put forward by industrial pluralists that the acceptance of collective bargaining by post-war governments equitably balanced the relationship between unions and business. In making this case, the thesis argues that the OLRA was structured by business and the close relationship it maintained with the Progressive Conservative governments of George Drew, Leslie Frost and John Robarts. In this regard, the entrenchment of collective bargaining in Ontario was closely aligned with the class interests of Ontario businesses. The close relationship that business maintained with the provincial government also worked to limit the discretionary power of the OLRB. Although the OLRB was originally intended to ensure impartiality and fairness in regulating trade union freedoms, its discretionary power was eroded by business pressure. In order to challenge the OLRB, business was able to appeal to the courts in order to challenge the expertise and jurisdiction of the Board. These challenges led to an increasing judicialization of the Board and limited its ability to extend trade union freedoms. Ultimately, these pressures suggested that the politics of class and class struggle shaped the structure of post-war legislation in Ontario. V Dedication This thesis is dedicated to my parents, Arlene and Wilfred Smith. As with most families, I suspect that mothers and fathers bring different perspectives to the issues that shape the thinking of their kids. In my family, my mother has been a passionate and courageous defender of social justice for as long as I can remember. In the same way, my father has imprinted an unwavering belief in the democratic capacity of working people and their unions to change the world. Together, they have shaped the ideas and arguments presented here. vi Acknowledgments Woody Allen once commented that "life is full of misery, loneliness, and suffering-and it's all over much too soon." While Woody was pondering the unanswerable meaning of life, I often felt that he could have been talking about the experience of a graduate student. Undeniably, the act of research, writing, editing and finishing a PhD thesis is a work of individual endurance that takes its toll on even the most dedicated of scholars. Notwithstanding the challenges, the things that stay with you, even after they are over, are the people that planted the ideas, motivated you to go the archive one more time or simply listened to your endless thoughts on this or that piece of legislation. In this light, I was fortunate to be surrounded by so many intelligent and dedicated people while completing this thesis. I would like to take this opportunity to thank them all in turn. At York University, I owe an intellectual debt of gratitude to my thesis advisors Lome Sossin, Bob Macdermid and Leo Panitch. All three of these scholars brought considerable talent and experience to this project and made it a far better piece of work than it could have been otherwise. I would like to thank the thesis' principle advisor, Lome Sossin for his years of considerable guidance and advice. Lome kindly and graciously took the early ideas presented here and helped construct them into a workable thesis. Bob Macdermid provided unique insight into the politics of Ontario and was invaluable in guiding the thesis through its final stages. As one of the world's leading scholars on Marxism and the left, Leo Panitch gave an incredible amount of time and insight, providing invaluable organizational and editorial advice, as well as contributing his considerable expertise on the Canadian state, political economy and trade unions. Few people are fortunate to work with such dedicated and accomplished academics. I am privileged to have completed this thesis amongst so many passionate and talented intellectuals at York University. Many of the people I have met through the Political Science Department, History and SPT have set the standard for academic achievement and progressive scholarship. I am also fortunate to have learned so much from progressive individuals in southern Ontario and in British Columbia. I am thankful for the advice, mentorship and friendship that came from the most passionate political theorists I have ever known, Geoff Kennedy and Angela Joya. I was lucky to call Gil Gaspar, one of the smartest men I have known, a friend, as well as and the most talented and courageous politician in Ontario, Cheri DiNovo. I am equally thankful for the advice and friendship of Larry Savage, Julian Ammirante, Dann Hoxsey, Jason Ellis, Fred Ho, Greg Albo, Bryan Palmer, Bryan Evans, Peter Graffe, Doug Jamieson, Tracey Summerville, Curtis Maloley, Sam Gindin, Ian Greene, Tom Wilson, the late Richard Slye, Travis Fast, Stephanie Ross, Derek Hrynyshyn, Chanchal Bhattacharya, Leah Bradshaw, Paul Hamilton, Matt Hennigar, Roddy Loeppky, Tyler Attwood, Jonathan Carson, Russell Janzen and Ian "raging" Hesketh. I was also privileged to work with two up-and-coming young scholars at Brock University, Tim Fowler and Brad Walchuk. vii I am grateful to the administrative expertise of Marlene Quesenberry and Jlenya Sarra as well as the staff at Brock University, the University of Toronto, Mississauga and the Archives of Ontario. I would also like to thank the Department of Political Science at York University and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship for ongoing financial support. It is important to single out some close friends who spent an unusual amount of time and effort helping to bring this project to the finish line. Geoff Read painstakingly went over almost every sentence in this thesis and provided invaluable editorial advice. Geoff s good humour and stern belief in comradery amongst young academics has been truly inspiring. My friend Dan Crow helped guide my intellectual development from the picketline, through our core courses and was my long-time roommate. While we spent hundreds of hours debating (often over several pints!), it was rare that we ever found substantial disagreement. I have also been privileged to call Dennis Pilon and Dave McGrane friends. I challenge anyone who has ever met Dennis to walk away from that first encounter without thinking that they have just met someone extraordinary. His brilliance and unending belief in the working class is awe-inspiring. Dennis is a true academic in every sense of the word. I can make similar observations about Dave McGrane. Dave and I met in 1999 when we were starting our MAs at York University.
Recommended publications
  • DRAFT Five Principles Open Letter
    c/o Mennonite Central Committee Ontario The Honourable Deb Matthews, MPP 50 Kent Ave. Minister of Health Kitchener, ON N2G 3R1 10th Floor, Hepburn Block 80 Grosvenor Street Toronto, Ontario M7A 2C4 March 25, 2010 Dear Minister Matthews, The decision the McGuinty government has taken to end the Special Diet Allowance for people on Ontario Works and the Ontario Disability Support Program has been interpreted as a disturbing signal about the degree to which government is committed to the goals of poverty reduction and the importance of protecting the human rights of people with disabilities. However, it also presents you with the opportunity to create a new program that will address the acknowledged shortcomings of the Special Diet Allowance program, while ensuring continuation of the important financial support it provides to people with documented health challenges. In light of the government's announcement that the Ministry of Health will be creating a replacement program for the Special Diet Allowance, we are writing to forward our proposal for Five Principles that should form the basis for this new program. The 25 in 5 Network and its partners, the ODSP Action Coalition and the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario (RNAO), are circulating the enclosed Five Principles document to other partner organizations, individuals, and supporters. We trust that you will hear from many around the province who also believe that the new program must be based on these principles. Statements about the scope and mandate of the new program have been made by members of government that have led many to fear that people currently receiving Special Diet will no longer be adequately supported by our government.
    [Show full text]
  • Austerity, Competitiveness and Neoliberalism Redux Ontario Responds to the Great Recession
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Socialist Studies (E-Journal) / Études Socialistes Socialist Studies / Études socialistes 7(1/2) Spring/Fall 2011: 141‐170 Copyright © 2011 The Author(s) SPECIAL ISSUE ON ORGANIZING FOR AUSTERITY: THE NEOLIBERAL STATE, REGULATING LABOUR AND WORKING CLASS RESISTANCE Austerity, Competitiveness and Neoliberalism Redux Ontario Responds to the Great Recession CARLO FANELLI and MARK P. THOMAS Sociology & Anthropology, Carleton University. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Sociology, York University. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Abstract This article examines the deepening integration of market imperatives throughout the province of Ontario. We do this by, first, examining neoliberalism’s theoretical underpinnings, second, reviewing Ontario’s historical context, and third, scrutinizing the Open Ontario Plan, with a focus on proposed changes to employment standards legislation. We argue that contrary to claims of shared restraint and the pressing need for public austerity, Premier McGuinty’s Liberal’s have re‐branded and re‐packaged core neoliberal policies in such a manner that costs are socialized and profits privatized, thereby intensifying class polarization along with its racialized and gendered diversities. Résumé Cet article analyse l’intégration de plus en plus profonde des impératifs du marché dans la province de l’Ontario. Nous faisons cette analyse, premièrement, en analysant les bases théoriques du néolibéralisme, deuxièmement, en décrivant le contexte historique de l’Ontario, et troisièmement, en examinant le “Open Ontario Plan”, sous l’angle particulier des propositions de changement de la législation sur le droit du Carlo Fanelli is a PhD candidate in the Department of Sociology & Anthropology at Carleton University.
    [Show full text]
  • In Canadian Labour Law Brian A
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 5 Volume 21, Number 3 (October 1983) "Equal Partnership" in Canadian Labour Law Brian A. Langille Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Article Citation Information Langille, Brian A.. ""Equal Partnership" in Canadian Labour Law." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 21.3 (1983) : 496-536. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol21/iss3/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. "EQUAL PARTNERSHIP" IN CANADIAN LABOUR LAW By BRIAN A. LANGILLE* I. THE ISSUE ............................................... 497 II. AN AMERICAN STARTING POINT ......................... 499 III. THE SCOPE OF THE DUTY TO BARGAIN IN CANADA ...... 503 IV. CERTIFICATION AND CERTIFICATES ..................... 506 V. AN EVALUATION ........................................ 508 VI. OTHER PARTS OF THE PUZZLE ........................... 512 A. The Statutory Timetable .................................. 512 B. The FunctionalContent of the Duty to Bargain .............. 514 C. The Freeze ............................................. 523 D. UnfairLabour Practices.................................. 528 E. The ArbitrationJurisprudence on ContractingOut ........... 532 VII. CONCLUSION ............................................ 536 © Copyright, 1983, Brian A. Langille. * Associate Professor of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto. 1983] Partnershipsin LabourLaw ... by permiting labour to organize freely and effectively we can convert the relation of master and servant in to an equal and cooperativepartnership.... I Senator Wagner (1932) ... Congress had no expectation that the elected union representative2 would become an equalpartnerin the running of the business enterprise. Blackmun J. (1981) The union is an equalpartner ... 3 Canada Labour Relations Board (1981) (Dorsey, Vice Chairman) We cannot subscribe to an interpretation .
    [Show full text]
  • COMPOSITION RÉCENTE DU CORPS POLITIQUE 895 Ministre
    COMPOSITION RÉCENTE DU CORPS POLITIQUE 895 Ministre délégué à l'Aménagement et au Développement Ministre de l'Industrie et du Commerce, l'hon. Frank S. régional et président du Comité ministériel permanent de Miller l'aménagement et du développement régional, l'hon. Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation, l'hon. François Gendron Dennis R. Timbrell Ministre des Relations internationales et ministre du Ministre de l'Éducation et ministre des Collèges et des Commerce extérieur, l'hon. Bernard Landry Universités, l'hon. Bette Stephenson, M.D. Ministre de la Main-d'oeuvre et de la Sécurité du revenu Procureur général, l'hon. Roy McMurtry, CR. et vice-présidente du Conseil du Trésor, l'hon. Pauline Marois Ministre de la Santé, l'hon. Keith C. Norton, CR. Ministre de l'Énergie et des Ressources, l'hon. Yves Ministre des Services sociaux et communautaires, l'hon. Duhaime Frank Drea Ministre délégué aux Relations avec les citoyens, l'hon. Trésorier provincial et ministre de l'Économie, l'hon. Denis Lazure Larry Grossman, CR. Ministre des Transports, l'hon. Jacques Léonard Président du conseil d'administration du Cabinet et président du Cabinet, l'hon. George McCague Ministre de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation, l'hon. Jean Garon Ministre du Tourisme et des Loisirs, l'hon. Reuben Baetz Ministre de l'Habitation et de la Protection du Ministre de la Consommafion et du Commerce, l'hon. consommateur, l'hon. Guy Tardif Robert G. Elgie, M.D. Ministre des Affaires culturelles, l'hon. Clément Richard Secrétaire provincial à la Justice, l'hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Unions Matter
    Unions Matter How the Ability of Labour Unions to Reduce Income Inequality and Influence Public Policy has been affected by Regressive Labour Laws Garry Sran with Michael Lynk, James Clancy and Derek Fudge Abstract Copyright March 2013: Ottawa Canadian Foundation for Labour Rights THERE IS EXTENSIVE RESEARCH literature that suggests Design and layout by Skip Hambling there are significant social benefits for countries with strong labour rights and a more extensive collective bargaining The Canadian Foundation for Labour Rights (CFLR) is a system. Income inequality is less extreme according to a national voice devoted to promoting labour rights as an im- variety of measures, civic engagement is higher, there are portant means to strengthening democracy, equality and more extensive social programs such as health care and economic justice here in Canada and internationally. pensions plans, and the incidence of poverty is significant- www.labourrights.ca ly smaller. This paper adds to the literature by examining the relationship between labour unions, income inequal- CFLR was established and is sponsored by the ity and regressive labour laws. National Union of Public and General Employees (NUPGE). www.nupge.ca The underlying causes of declining unionization rates will be examined for Canada and will be compared to other The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of developed economies. C. Meyer, M. Luff, B. Hildahl and D. Wells in the preparation of this paper. The paper finds that regressive labour laws in Canada have reduced unionization rates which has led to rising income inequality and reduced civic participation. UNIONS MATTER | CANADIAN FOUNDATION FOR LABOUR RIGHTS 1 n 1 Introduction FOR OVER 30 YEARS income inequality in Canada and throughout the world has been rising.
    [Show full text]
  • Crash Landing: Citizens, the State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968- 1976
    Crash Landing: Citizens, The State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968- 1976 ii Crash Landing: Citizens, The State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968- 1976 By Michael Rowan, B.A., M.A. Supervisor: Dr. Ken Cruikshank Committee Members: Dr. Richard Harris, Dr. John Weaver, Dr. Penny Bryden A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy McMaster University © Copyright by Michael Rowan, January 2019. iii McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2018) Hamilton, Ontario (History) TITLE: Crash Landing: Citizens, The State and Protest Against Federal Airport Development, 1968-1976 AUTHOR: Michael Rowan, B.A. (York University), M.A. (York University) PROFESSOR: Ken Cruikshank NUMBER OF PAGES 206 iv Abstract During the 1960s both the federal and provincial governments continued to take on new and larger responsibilities. During this same time period citizens began to mobilize and challenge the state on a number of social issues including race, gender, labour, urban sprawl and the environment. Citizens believed that not only did they have the right to challenge the authority of government in planning public policy, but they also had a right to participate in the decision- making process as much as any bureaucrat, expert, or elected official. In planning airports in Pickering, Ste. Scholastique and Sea Island, the federal government was opposed by citizen groups in each of these three cases. Citizens believed their voices were not being heard and that government officials did not respect them. As a result, they disrupted the meticulously laid out plans of elected officials and policy planners by drawing on evidence and expert advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Proquest Dissertations
    000083 RRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR RRRRRRRRRRRRRm*RRRRRRRRRRRERRRRRRRR RRR RRR REE RRR RRR HKR RRR HRR RR RR R R EGERTOW RXSRSOI LIBRARIES .* By F. J. McDonald! M.A., B. Paed. RRRR RR R (<\b1 UMI Number: EC55674 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the c submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrate and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and imp alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manusci and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthoriz copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletior UMI® UMI Microform EC55674 Copyright 2011 by ProQuest LLC All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected againsl unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 A«~ A-U„,. k/ll /Q-mfi fJ/IC COHIEIT S CHAP. PAGE I. Introduction 2 II. What is Canadian Literature? . 13 III. The Puritan Influence on Canadian. Literature 22 IV. The Loyalist Influence 28 V. She Influence of Methodism on English Literature ... 37 71. Ryerson1s Early Life and-Writing 47 711. His Work at the Credit and Cobourg 74 Till. Ryerson as a Pamphleteer .... 82 IX. Ryerson Becomes an Editor ... 96 X. Ryerson in Politics 108 XI. Last Year as Editor 122 XII. Dr. Ryerson Defends Metcalfe . .146 XIII. The University Question . .155 XI7. The Common School System . .175 CHAP. PAGE XV. The Development of the School System 201 XVI. She Separate Sehool Question.207 XYII.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Advocacy in the Ascendant Osgoode Sets Its Sights on Areas Where the Fairness, Accessibility and Effectiveness of Justice Can Be Improved Through Visual Media
    OSGOODE HALL LAW SCHOOL OF YORK UNIVERSITY | ALUMNI MAGAZINE WINTER 2016 Visual Advocacy in the Ascendant Osgoode sets its sights on areas where the fairness, accessibility and effectiveness of justice can be improved through visual media. 10 Visual Advocacy CONTINUUM in the Ascendant Osgoode Hall Law School Alumni Magazine Osgoode, with the generous assistance of Volume 40 Kathryn Podrebarac ’92, has established EDITOR the Fund for Innovation in Law and Media Anita Herrmann (FILM) to create and sustain experiential Director, Office of External education programs focused on the use of Relations & Communications visual advocacy. Initial projects include the 416-736-5364 [email protected] Gladue Video Project and the Justice Video CONTRIBUTING EDITOR Information Project. Virginia Corner Manager, Communications 14 Bridging Law WRITERS Suzanne Bowness and Community Meghan Carrington Osgoode Visiting Professor Jamil Jivani is Bev Cline Virginia Corner inspiring Osgoode students to put law into New Ways to Connect Anita Herrmann action through his Community Organizing Kaitlin Normandin and the Law course and initiatives such as Lorne Sossin mobilizing voter turnout in the Jane and Christine Ward Finch neighbourhood. PHOTOGRAPHY Ian Crysler New Paramount Studios Ltd. 16 Osgoode’s Helping Hand Sjoerd Witteveen Members of the Osgoode community go DESIGN AND PRODUCTION above and beyond to support Syria’s refugees SPARK | sparkbranding.ca at home and abroad. WINTER 2016 PRINTING RJM Print Group LINKEDIN FACEBOOK YOUTUBE TWITTER Continuum is published once a year by Osgoode 20 Celebrating our Illustrious Osgoode Hall facebook.com/ youtube.com/ @OsgoodeNews Hall Law School of York University for alumni and Law School osgoode OsgoodeHall friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Society Lacks Consistently Defined Attitudes
    ‘OUR SOCIETY LACKS CONSISTENTLY DEFINED ATTITUDES TOWARDS THE BLACK BEAR’: THE HISTORY OF BLACK BEAR HUNTING AND MANAGEMENT IN ONTARIO, 1912-1987 by MICHAEL COMMITO, B.A. (HONS), M.A. McMaster University DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (2015) Hamilton, Ontario (History) TITLE: ‘Our society lacks consistently defined attitudes towards the black bear’: The History of Black Bear Hunting and Management in Ontario, 1912-1987 AUTHOR: Michael Commito, B.A. (Hons) (Laurentian University), M.A. (Laurentian University) SUPERVISOR: Dr. Ken Cruikshank NUMBER OF PAGES: vii, 282 ii ABSTRACT What kind of animal was a black bear? Were black bears primarily pests, pets, furbearers or game animals? Farmers, conservationists, tourists, trappers, and hunters in early twentieth- century Ontario could not agree. Even as the century progressed, ideas about bears remained twisted and there was often very little consensus about what the animal represented. These varying perceptions complicated the efforts of the provincial Department of Game and Fisheries and its successor agencies, the Department of Lands and Forests and the Ministry of Natural Resources, to develop coherent bear management policies. Perceptions about black bears often conflicted and competed with one another and at no one time did they have a single meaning in Ontario. The image of Ontario’s black bears has been continuously negotiated as human values, attitudes, and policies have changed over time. As a result, because of various and often competing perspectives, the province’s bear management program, for most of the twentieth century, was very loose and haphazard because the animal had never been uniformly defined or valued. Examining the history of these ambiguous viewpoints towards the black bear in Ontario provides us with a snapshot of how culture intersects with our natural resources and may pose challenges for management.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Decline of the Cooperative Commonwealth
    THE RISE AND DECLINE OF THE COOPERATIVE COMMONWEALTH FEDERATION IN ONTARIO AND QUEBEC DURING WORLD WAR II, 1939 – 1945 By Charles A. Deshaies B. A. State University of New York at Potsdam, 1987 M. A. State University of New York at Empire State, 2005 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) The Graduate School The University of Maine December 2019 Advisory Committee: Scott W. See, Professor Emeritus of History, Co-advisor Jacques Ferland, Associate Professor of History, Co-advisor Nathan Godfried, Professor of History Stephen Miller, Professor of History Howard Cody, Professor Emeritus of Political Science Copyright 2019 Charles A. Deshaies All Rights Reserved ii THE RISE AND DECLINE OF THE COOPERATIVE COMMONWEALTH FEDERATION IN ONTARIO AND QUEBEC DURING WORLD WAR II, 1939 – 1945 By Charles A. Deshaies Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Scott See and Dr. Jacques Ferland An Abstract of the Thesis Presented In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in History) December 2019 The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) was one of the most influential political parties in Canadian history. Without doubt, from a social welfare perspective, the CCF helped build and develop an extensive social welfare system across Canada. It has been justly credited with being one of the major influences over Canadian social welfare policy during the critical years following the Great Depression. This was especially true of the period of the Second World War when the federal Liberal government of Mackenzie King adroitly borrowed CCF policy planks to remove the harsh edges of capitalism and put Canada on the path to a modern Welfare State.
    [Show full text]
  • Download 1 File
    ^-^mmi mm- ProYinc# of Orrfvwrku liiix a&k Ontario DEBATES AND PROCEEDINGS of the Second and Third Sessions of the Thirtieth Legislature of the Province of Ontario - Thursday, January 15, 1976 Friday, January 16, 1976 Tuesday, March 9, 1 976 -Thursday, Decemberl6, 1976 INDEX INDICES Provincial Parliament Council Members 3 Provincial Parliament Members 4 Alphabetical List of Bills 7 Numerical List of Bills Private Bills 10 Government Bills 12 Members' Bills 20 Subjects and speakers (alphabetical by Subjects) 26 Speakers and subjects (alphabetical by Members) 93 Speaker: Honourable Russell Daniel Rowe Clerk: Roderick Lewis, Q.G. THE QUEEN'S PRINTER PARLIAMENT BUILDINGS, TORONTO 1977 10 Members of the Executive Council* Hon. William G. Davis, Premier and President of the Council Hon. Robert Welch, Minister of Culture and Recreation Hon. James A. C. Auld, Chairman, Management Board of Cabinet Hon. Rene Brunelle, Minister without Portfolio and Chairman of Cabinet Hon. Thomas L. Wells, Minister of Education Hon. George A. Kerr, Minister of the Environment Hon. Leo Bernier, Minister of Natural Resources Hon. James W. Snow, Minister of Transportation and Communications Hon. Margaret Birch, Provincial Secretary for Social Development Hon. Claude Bennett, Minister of Industry and Tourism Hon. W. Darcy McKeough, Treasurer, Minister of Economics and Intergovernmental Affairs Hon. Arthur K. Meen, Minister of Revenue Hon. William Newman, Minister of Agriculture and Food Hon. Sidney B. Handleman, Minister of Consumer and Commercial Relations Hon. Frank S. Miller, Minister of Health Hon. John R. Rhodes, Minister of Housing Hon. Donald R. Irvine, Provincial Secretary for Resources Development Hon. Dennis R. Timbrell, Minister of Energy Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report on Vulnerable Workers and Precarious Work
    Vulnerable Workers and Precarious Work INTERIM REPORT August 2012 Available online at www.lco-cdo.org Disponible en français ISBN: 978-1-926661-46-9 ABOUT THE LAW COMMISSION OF ONTARIO The Law Commission of Ontario (LCO) was created by an Agreement among the Law Foundation of Ontario, the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Osgoode Hall Law School and the Law Society of Upper Canada, all of whom provide funding for the LCO, and the Law Deans of Ontario’s law schools. It is located at Osgoode Hall Law School, York University. The mandate of the LCO is to recommend law reform measures to enhance the legal system’s relevance, effectiveness and accessibility; improve the administration of justice through the clarification and simplification of the law; consider the use of technology to enhance access to justice; stimulate critical legal debate; and support scholarly research. The LCO is independent of government and selects projects that are of interest to and reflective of the diverse communities in Ontario. It has committed to engage in multi-disciplinary research and analysis and make holistic recommendations as well as to collaborate with other bodies and consult with affected groups and the public more generally. Law Commission of Ontario Final Reports The Law as It Affects Older Adults (April 2012) Modernization of the Provincial Offences Act (August 2011) Joint and Several Liability Under the Ontario Business Corporations Act (February 2011) Division of Pensions Upon Marriage Breakdown (December 2008) Fees for Cashing Government Cheques (November 2008) DISCLAIMER The opinions or points of view expressed in our research, findings and recommendations do not necessarily represent the views of our funders and supporters named above.
    [Show full text]