DOCSLIB.ORG

Soil Survey of Rhea County, Tennessee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soil Survey of Rhea County, Tennessee United States In cooperation with Department of Tennessee Agricultural Agriculture Experiment Station, Soil Survey of Tennessee Department of Agriculture, Rhea County Rhea County, Board of Commissioners, and Rhea County Soil Natural Conservation District Tennessee Resources Conservation Service 3 How To Use This Soil Survey The information provided in this publication can be useful in planning the use and management of small areas. The text includes descriptions of detailed soil map units and provides an explanation of the information presented in the tables, or soil reports, which are available via the Web Soil Survey of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (accessible from the Soils Web site at http://soils.usda.gov). The publication also includes a glossary of terms used in the text and tables and a list of references. Bookmarks and links in the publication allow the user to navigate from one part of the text to another. Maps showing soil lines and map unit symbols can be accessed for a particular area of interest through Web Soil Survey (by clicking on the “Soil Map” tab). The symbols on the maps represent the detailed soil map units in the area. These map units are listed in the bookmarks panel of the text. Information about the map units can be accessed by clicking on the appropriate bookmark. The bookmarks panel of the text outlines the contents of this publication. 4 This soil survey is a publication of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (formerly the Soil Conservation Service) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Major fieldwork for this soil survey was completed in 2001. Soil names and descriptions were approved in 2003. Unless otherwise indicated, statements in this publication refer to conditions in the survey area in 2001. This survey was made cooperatively by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station, the Tennessee Department of Agriculture, the Rhea County Board of Commissioners, and the Rhea County Soil Conservation District. The survey is part of the technical assistance furnished to the Rhea County Soil Conservation District. Soil maps in this survey may be copied without permission. Enlargement of these maps, however, could cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping. If enlarged, maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a larger scale. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all of its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, or, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, or political beliefs, as a means of reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call 800-795-3272 (voice) or 202-720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover: The historic Rhea County Courthouse in an area of Urban land-Udorthents complex, 2 to 12 percent slopes. (Photo courtesy of Eva Cruver) Additional information about the Nation’s natural resources is available on the Natural Resources Conservation Service home page on the World Wide Web. The address is http://www.nrcs.usda.gov. 5 Contents Cover ....................................................................... 1 CgD—Collegedale silt loam, 12 to 25 percent How To Use This Soil Survey ................................. 3 slopes .......................................................... 53 Contents.................................................................. 5 CoC—Conasauga silt loam, 5 to 12 percent Foreword ................................................................. 9 slopes .......................................................... 54 General Nature of the County ................................ 11 Cr—Cranmore loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, How This Survey Was Made .................................. 17 frequently flooded ........................................ 56 General Soil Map Units ........................................ 19 DeB—Dewey silt loam, 2 to 5 percent 1. Lily-Gilpin-Ramsey ...................................... 19 slopes .......................................................... 57 2. Gilpin-Allen-Bouldin-Petros.......................... 20 DeC—Dewey silt loam, 5 to 12 percent 3. Shady-Hamblen-Waynesboro-Cobstone ..... 21 slopes .......................................................... 58 4. Pailo-Fullerton-Tasso................................... 23 DeD—Dewey silt loam, 12 to 25 percent 5. Colbert-Lyerly-Ketona-Capshaw ................. 24 slopes ......................................................... 59 6. Townley-Sunlight-Salacoa-Apison ............... 25 DL—Dumps, landfills.......................................... 61 7. Waynesboro-Holston-Wolftever ................... 26 Ec—Ealy-Craigsville complex, occasionally 8. Waynesboro-Pailo-Holston .......................... 27 flooded ......................................................... 61 Detailed Soil Map Units ....................................... 29 Eg—Egam silty clay loam, 0 to 3 percent Ac—Allegheny-Cotaco complex, occasionally slopes .......................................................... 64 flooded ......................................................... 30 EtB—Etowah loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes .......... 65 AeB—Allen loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes............. 31 EtC—Etowah loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes........ 66 AeC—Allen loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes .......... 32 FuB—Fullerton gravelly silt loam, 2 to 5 AeD—Allen loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes ........ 34 percent slopes ............................................. 67 AMC—Allen-Urban land complex, 2 to 12 FuC—Fullerton gravelly silt loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes ............................................. 35 percent slopes ............................................. 69 AnB—Altavista loam, 1 to 5 percent slopes ....... 36 FuD—Fullerton gravelly silt loam, 12 to 25 AsF—Apison-Sunlight-Salacoa complex, 25 percent slopes ............................................. 70 to 65 percent slopes .................................... 37 FuF—Fullerton gravelly silt loam, 25 to 60 At—Atkins loam, frequently flooded ................... 39 percent slopes ............................................. 71 BaE—Barfield-Rock outcrop complex, 10 GpC—Gilpin loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes ......... 73 to 40 percent slopes .................................... 40 GpD—Gilpin loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes ....... 74 BEF—Bethesda-Mine pits complex, 10 GpF—Gilpin loam, 20 to 60 percent slopes ....... 75 to 80 percent slopes .................................... 42 GuF—Gilpin-Bouldin-Petros complex, 25 to Bm—Bloomingdale silty clay loam, frequently 80 percent slopes, very stony ...................... 77 flooded ......................................................... 43 Ha—Hamblen silt loam, occasionally flooded .... 79 CaB—Capshaw silt loam, 2 to 5 percent HoB—Holston loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes ........ 80 slopes .......................................................... 44 HoC—Holston loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes ...... 82 CaC—Capshaw silt loam, 5 to 12 percent JeC—Jefferson cobbly loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes .......................................................... 46 slopes .......................................................... 83 Cb—Cobstone cobbly fine sandy loam, 0 to 3 JsD—Jefferson-Shelocta complex, 10 to 20 percent slopes, rarely flooded ..................... 47 percent slopes ............................................. 84 CDB—Cobstone-Shady-Urban land complex, JsF—Jefferson-Shelocta complex, 20 to 45 0 to 5 percent slopes, rarely flooded............ 49 percent slopes ............................................. 86 CeC—Colbert and Lyerly soils, 2 to 12 percent JvD—Jefferson-Varilla-Shelocta complex, 10 slopes, very rocky ........................................ 50 to 20 percent slopes, very stony .................. 87 CgC—Collegedale silt loam, 2 to 12 percent JvF—Jefferson-Varilla-Shelocta complex, 20 slopes .......................................................... 52 to 60 percent slopes, very stony .................. 89 6 Kt—Ketona–Tupelo complex, 0 to 3 percent TsD—Townley-Sunlight complex, 12 to 25 slopes, frequently flooded ............................ 90 percent slopes ........................................... 126 LhB—Lily loam, 2 to 5 percent slopes................ 92 UUC—Urban land-Udorthents complex, 2 LhC—Lily loam, 5 to 12 percent slopes ............. 93 to 12 percent slopes .................................. 127 LhD—Lily loam, 12 to 20 percent slopes ........... 94 W—Water......................................................... 129 LhE—Lily loam, 20 to 35 percent slopes............ 96 Wa—Wax-Rockdell complex, 0 to 3 percent LnB—Lonewood-Hendon complex, 2 to 5 slopes, occasionally flooded ...................... 129 percent
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TCWP Newsletter No
    TENNESSEE CITIZENS for WILDERNESS PLANNING Newsletter No. 207 September 30, 1995 llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll 1. Obed Wild&: Scenic River ..... ............................ ... p. 3 A. Congressman Wamp visits C General management Plan now official B. Cumberland Plateau water-supply study progresses 2. Big South Fork NRRA .... .................. , P· 4 A. Two major tracts acquired B. Bear Creek improvement plans 3. Around the State.. .. .. ... .. .. .. .. .. .. • . p. 5 A. TCWP appe.1.ling Champion permit F. Stripmining and fall Creek Falls B. Scotts Gulf protection effort G. Stale Park m;magement politicized C. Golf course for Roan Mtn.Stille Park7 H. Concerns about environmental policy D. TWRA's existence threatened J. 1995legislative outcomes E. Nongame wildlife preservation K. Wolf River land purchased L. Tennessee Greenways 4, Smokies .. ················· ·· ····· ... ......... P· 8 A. Secreta!)' Babbitt visits C Smoky because of pollution B. Helms threatens red wolf reintroduction D. Should there be an entrance fee? 5. The Cherokee and surroundings . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. p. 9 A. Big Frog wilderness protection B. The Appalachian landscape (ronferencel 6. Tennessee Valley Authority . ... .. ... .. ... .... p. 10 A. Energy plan: some disappointments B. Resource budget survives (but leaner) '1. Congress' war on Parks .. ... , , . .............. ................. p.ll A. Parks-closure bill: good and b01d news B. Other anti-Parks bills 8. Congress' war on other federal land protection .. .. p.12 A. Land acquisition almost zeroed C. Anti-wilderness precedent B. Mania for federal divestiture D. The big give-away: our mineral resources E. Arctic Refuge must not be developed! 9. Other national issues . .. ................. ........ p.13 A. Endangered Species Act in jeopardy B. Wolf conservation 10. Oilk Ridge area news , . • • . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ....... p. 14 A. Common Ground prDCess B.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Meeting – Monday April 2, 2018 Reports from the Field Club Meeting *****Annual Dues
    Newsletter of the Chattanooga Hiking Club March 2018 Club Meeting Reports from the Field The Chattanooga Hiking Club meets at 6:30 PM on the Twenty-Mile to AT, Twenty-Mile Loop, Ridge first Monday of even numbered months at the Outdoor Trail Chattanooga offices on River Street. Directions to the Saturday January 27, 2018 meeting site are on the club website: chatthiking.com An eager bunch left the Food City in Ooltewah at 6:30 headed to the Smokies. The trail started out deceptively flat but soon began the steady uphill trek to the intersection with the AT. It Next meeting – Monday April 2, 2018 was so windy there that after touching the sign everyone dropped back down the trail for the lunch break. The return trip began rather quickly as the temperature, though not too cold, *****Annual Dues ***** and wind had a very chilling effect. Twenty Mile Loop and a straight return on Twenty Mile trail were the choices for the Yes, the $20 annual dues will be due by April 1, 2018, return trip. Glad to get warm and head for dinner in Vonore at unless you have joined since the first of this year or have Pizzeria Venti were: Charlie Breeding, Betsy Parson, Bonnie already paid for this year. Go to the website, “About Us” Smith, Carolyn Brannon, Rick Glisson, Monty Simmons, Tim tab, and “Renewal Form” tab, to print the form. Chomyn, Anne Moore, and Wayne Chambers leading. Quote of the day: "Boy I sure am glad to get here!" after Hopefully we can get the stickers to update your Rock trekking uphill to the AT junction and touching the Creek discount cards out to you by the first of May.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday GRSM SCHOOLHOUSE HIKE March 9
    March 2019 A.T. WORK TRIP EASY HIKE: THUNDERHEAD PRONG QUIET WALKWAY March 2 – Saturday March 16-SATURDAY We will be clearing the trail of trees and limb debris near Fontana that From the Middle Prong trailhead we will go right on the seldom traveled have fallen over the winter, as well as prepping the trail for the upcoming Thunderhead Prong Walkway. It is a short but scenic walk. We'll return to thru-hiker season. Volunteers are needed to assist the certified sawyers Middle Prong & walk to what remains of an old Cadillac. Hike 5.5 miles. with removal of debris after it is cut. We will also repair tread as needed. Mileage reimbursement $2.00. Meet at Maryville WalMart @7:30 AM. 140 miles RT =$7.00. Meet @ Alcoa Food City @ 9:00. Leader: Franklin LaFond, [email protected], 678-464-3380 Leader: David Smith [email protected] RICH MTN. LOOP March 6 - Wednesday VIRGIN FALLS POCKET WILDERNESS AREA We’ll hike the Rich Mountain Loop trail to Indian Grave Gap and down March 23- Saturday Crooked Arm Ridge to complete a moderate approximately 8.5 mile 1960 This lollipop hike offers 3 impressive waterfalls as well as the usual karst foot elevation gain loop that starts at the entrance to Cades Cove. Enjoy landscape common to the Cumberland Plateau. One of the most unusual great views overlooking Dry Valley toward Townsend as well as Cades features of Virgin Falls itself is that the water drops over a hundred feet Cove and explore site of fire tower on Rich Mountain, our highest point only to disappear in a sinkhole.
    [Show full text]
  • (Asteraceae) in Tennessee: S. Arenicola and S. Simplex
    Floden, A. 2012. Notes on two rare Solidago (Asteraceae) in Tennessee: S. arenicola and S. simplex . Phytoneuron 2012-63: 1–4. Published 2 Aug 2012. ISSN 2153 733X NOTES ON TWO RARE SOLIDAGO (ASTERACEAE) IN TENNESSEE: S. ARENICOLA AND S. SIMPLEX AARON FLODEN Herbarium TENN Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 [email protected] ABSTRACT Solidago simplex subsp. randii var . racemosa is reconfirmed as a member of the Tennessee flora. Solidago arenicola is similarly confirmed although there are minor morphological differences between the Tennessee plants and typical plants from Alabama. Solidago arenicola in Tennessee is disjunct by about 300 kilometers from the type locality in Alabama and by about 370 kilometers from a reported occurrence in Kentucky, the only other known areas of distribution for the species. Solidago simplex and S. arenicola in Tennessee are distributed on two separate river systems of the Cumberland Plateau. KEYWORDS: Solidago arenicola , Solidago racemosa , Tennessee, Obed River, Big South Fork The recent floristic checklist of Tennessee (Chester et al. 2009) reported Solidago arenicola Keener & Kral based on material from two counties, Morgan and Scott, both of the Cumberland Plateau physiographic province where they grow along river-scoured rocky margins or on cobble bars. The present report of S. arenicola in Tennessee is due to the referral of the Tennessee populations to that species by Semple and Cook (2006) and their suggestion that the identity of the plants needs confirmation. Specimens at TENN were annotated to Solidago arenicola by Dwayne Estes based on a presumption of their identity fide Semple and Cook (2006) and their comparison to an isotype at TENN.
    [Show full text]
  • TCWP Newsletter No
    TENNESSEE CITIZENS for WILDERNESS PLANNING NewsleHer No. 204 April17, 1995 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 1. National Park System in jeopardy .. , , , , ........................................ p. 3 A. HR 260, an Anti-Parks bill. HELP!!! C. NPS reorganization"' chaos? B. Resdsion takes away NPS 1995 funds D. Park-support groups meet 2. Obed and Big South Fork ........................................................ p. 4 A. Scoping for regional water supply EIS C. Friends of BSFNRRA formed B. Implications of the rescisions for Obed and BSF 3. Coli courses in stale puks?........ p. 6 4. Action needed on additional state items . .. .. .. .. .. p. 7 A. ScoH's Gulf at risk C. Bills in state legislatu«- 8. Processing plant for Champion logging D. Key legislative commiHees 5. More state issues and news .. p. 9 A. Future mining in the Cherokee1 E. Protection for "non-game" species B. Sequatchie Valley threatened F. Military reservations rich in species C To revive Cumberland Trail G. Tennessee Environmental Endowment D. French Broad lands preserved 6. Smokies ............... ....................................................... p.11 A. Noisy overflights B. Abrams Cr. /Chilhowee Mtn. C. Elkmont cabins 7. Tennessee Valley Authority ... p.12 A. TVA in grave danger B. Update on the Duck River 8. National news: crises abound .................................................... p. 13 A. "Dirty Water'' Bill E. "Green Scissors" could cut billions B. To double National Forest timber cuts F. Northwest Forest Plan approved C. Sham "reform" of 1872 Mining Law G. Tracking coal-mine violations D. Mine threatens Yellowstone NP H. Temperatures headed up again 9. Oak Ridge capsules .................... .. p.IS A. North Ridge Trail C. Second greenway ready B. Worthington Cemetery D. Oak Ridge Reservation 10. TCWP news ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey of State-Owned Lands
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF STATE-OWNED LANDS ,II Tennessee Department of Conservation . .;(' Division' of Archaeology Report, of Investigations No. 3 1986 ARCHAEOLOOICAL SURVEY OF STATE-OWNED LARDS conducted by Tennessee Division of Archaeology . 1982 - 1984 by John D.· Froeschauer Peggy S.Froeschauer Charles P. Stripling Tennessee Department of Conservation Division of Archaeology Report of Investigations No. 3 1986 ..~ ", Autho. No. 327129. This, public document was promulgated at a cost of $3.97 ea. 200/1/87 • TN Printing Div .. Nashville, TN 37219-5208. PREFACE TO STATE LANDS SURVEY REPORT NOTICE TO READERS The Division of Archaeology in accord with its legislative mandate to research, investigate, and preserve and' protect the archaeological heritage of Tennessee has conducted a series of archaeological surveys and excavation projects since 1973. The Division, along with the staff of the Tennessee Historical Commission, is also a part of the State Historic Preservation Office which conducts programs of the Department of Interior's National Historic Preservation Act programs. One of the major responsibilities of the SHPO's staff is to carry out comprehensive archaeological and historical resource planning which includes providing written information on such resources and their significance to planners, land managers, and others whose decisions affect or may affect the heritage resources. This report describing the known archaeological sites located on state­ owned lands is one part of a series of studies and documents intended for the use of managers and planners as well as archaeologists and other researchers. Since this report is intended to be used by a variety of readers, it may be helpful to discuss the organization of the information it contains.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological and Dendrochronological Investigations at Cagle Saltpetre Cave, Van Buren County, Tennessee Sarah Anne Blankenship University of Tennessee - Knoxville
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2007 Archaeological and Dendrochronological Investigations at Cagle Saltpetre Cave, Van Buren County, Tennessee Sarah Anne Blankenship University of Tennessee - Knoxville Recommended Citation Blankenship, Sarah Anne, "Archaeological and Dendrochronological Investigations at Cagle Saltpetre Cave, Van Buren County, Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/242 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Sarah Anne Blankenship entitled "Archaeological and Dendrochronological Investigations at Cagle Saltpetre Cave, Van Buren County, Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Joseph C. Douglas, Jan F. Simek Accepted for the Council: Dixie L. Thompson Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official student records.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Sarah Anne Blankenship entitled “Archaeological and Dendrochronological Investigations at Cagle Saltpetre Cave, Van Buren County, Tennessee.” I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of the Arts, with a major in Anthropology.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring City Tennesse
    We are a Rhea County United Way Agency City of Dayton 423-775-1817 Fax: 423-775-8404 Sunday School . .10:00am Sunday Morning Worship Service (Classes for all ages) . .11:00am 423-265-3455 Sunday Evening Worship Service (Winter) . 6:00pm www.daytontn.net Sunday Evening Worship Service (Summer) . 7:00pm Wednesday Evening Service . 7:00pm Together, we can save a life 399 First Ave. • P.O. Box 226 Children’s Wednesday Night Program. 6:30pm www.redcross.org Dayton, Tennessee 37321 A B C D E H ILL 16 IMPORTANT NUMBERS S RD Welcome To 29 EMERGENCY 1 27 GREENWAY BLVD DIAL 911 1 LOWER Police . 775-3876 FINE LN RAY ARNOLD LN INDUSTRIAL PPALACHIAN UPPER Dayto, Tennesse A FINE LN AREA DR Fire . 775-2525 BACK VALLEY RD CAR LY W 8 LE H Ambulance . 775-2141 R I D T E 13 O A K City Hall . 775-1817 SEE POCKET SNOW FALLS DUNN OVERLOOK BRIDGE WILDERNESS INSET RD (2 miles from Trailhead) P Member (3.7 miles from E CAMPSITE A Trailhead) LAUREL FALLS CAMPSITE V WHITE OAK (4.3 miles from Y TRAILER PARK LN H (2.7 miles from Trailhead) H QUAIL LN FDIC Trailhead) RICHLAND CREEK O I I D N U D I CAMPSITE D L E SE E N A R (1.8 miles from LN W D DAYTON STREET INDEX MANUFACTURERS RD N I M Trailhead) S SE INOL H H E I I LN L L Spring City 365-8400 LAUREL FALLS L L ABLE DR B5 GODBEHERE RD C6 PAT BUCKNER LN A6 POCKETT WILDERNESS RD INDUSTRIAL ANNEX DR S S (2.6 miles WALNUT GROVE RD D D ACADEMY AVE B3 GOSSETT LN C5 PEARL ST C3 HIXSON R 369 Front St.
    [Show full text]
  • TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 5-2007 Archaeological and Dendrochronological Investigations at Cagle Saltpetre Cave, Van Buren County, Tennessee Sarah Anne Blankenship University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Blankenship, Sarah Anne, "Archaeological and Dendrochronological Investigations at Cagle Saltpetre Cave, Van Buren County, Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2007. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/242 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Sarah Anne Blankenship entitled "Archaeological and Dendrochronological Investigations at Cagle Saltpetre Cave, Van Buren County, Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Arts, with a major in Anthropology. Charles H. Faulkner, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Joseph C. Douglas, Jan F. Simek Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges
    [Show full text]
  • Fall Creek Falls State Park Business & Management Plan
    Fall Creek Falls State Park Business & Management Plan 1 Table of Contents Mission Statement………………………………………………………02 Goals, Objectives and Action Plans…………………………………03 Park Overview………..………………………………………………….29 Park & Operations Assessment………………………………………35 Park Inventory and Facility Assessment……………………40 Operational Assessment………………………………………41 Financial Performance Assessment…………………………47 Competitors………………………………………………………54 Customer Service & Satisfaction Plan………………………………55 Financial Pro Forma…………………………………………………….56 Park Map…………………………………………………………………..59 2 Park’s Mission Statement Fall Creek Falls State Park will forever be committed to protecting and preserving the most scenic and significant waterfalls, gorges, and forest of the Cumberland Plateau, while telling the story of the settlers that came before us. These parklands will provide the opportunity to experience the splendor and wildness of Tennessee’s Cumberland Plateau. Fall Creek Falls State Park is dedicated to protecting and preserving the natural and cultural resource of the parkland for perpetuity. While providing safe, quality, and diverse recreation and interpretive opportunities as well as providing well-managed stay use accommodations and day use facilities. (Source: FCFSP MDS, 2013). Goals, Objectives and Action Plans Definitions: COGS – Cost of Goods Sold SEER – Seasonal Energy Efficiency Rating LEAN – Process Improvement Method Goal 1. Cost Management See Financial Pro forma section for the Parks’ cost objective. Fall Creek Falls State Park self-sufficiency is currently forecasting FY 2013-14 operations at a 72% cost recovery of operational expenses through earned revenues. This percentage can be enhanced by increasing revenues (see Goal 2); by controlling COGS; by controlling Personnel costs and other expenses. Objective 1: Plans for controlling COGS - list $ or % of revenue; unless noted otherwise, all objectives are for completion by end of FY13-14.
    [Show full text]
  • TCWP Newsletter No
    TENNESSEE CITIZENS FOR WILDERNESS PLANNING Newsletter No. 35, October 13, 1970 1. A fine visual program is planned for our annual meeting, Oct. 29 ........ p.1 2. Positions of candidates on conservation issues .......................... p.1 3. Obed and Buffalo Studies now truly underway ............................. p.3 4. For a Slickrock Creek - Joyce Kilmer Wilderness ......................... p.3 5. Two court cases involving Tennessee conservation issues (Overton Park; Obion channelization) ............................ p.4 6. No Senate SST vote yet; economic arguments are added to environmental ones . p.5 7. Environmental Reorganization Plan approved .............................. p.5 8. Great outings continue through November ................................. p.5 9. Nominees for TCWP Board. Proposed amendments ............................ p.7 1. NEW FILM AND SLIDESHOW AT ANNUAL MEETING, OCT. 29 Time: Thursday, October 29, 7:30 p.m. Place: Oak Ridge, Cooperative Science Education Center, Oak Ridge Turnpike (just east of Armory and opposite Garden Apartments) Program (not necessarily in this order): 1. Film “Naturally in Tennessee”. This excellent color-sound film was shot by a nationally acclaimed photographer this spring and summer, has just been released. We are grateful to state parks naturalist Mack Prichard, not only for making the film available, but for much of the direction of its content. 2. A very entertaining short slide program on rivers and people, by Jules Tileston, Bureau of Outdoor Recreation, Washington, D.C. 3. Short reports on the year's progress. 4. Annual business of the organization, such as election of officers and board of directors, vote on proposed amendments to constitution and by-laws. (Be sure to see item 9 of this Newsletter, which pertains to this business.) To conduct our business democratically, we need a large turnout.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 CRITA Program
    CURRENT RESEARCH IN TENNESSEE ARCHAEOLOGY 18TH ANNUAL MEETING Friday, February 3 and Saturday, February 4, 2006 Ed Jones Auditorium, Ellington Agricultural Center FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 3 2:00 Governor’s Archaeological Advisory Council meeting. 3:30 Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology meeting. 5:00 Reception at Ed Jones Auditorium following TCPA meeting. SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 4 8:25 Welcome and Opening Remarks 8:30 A Survey of World War II Military Sites in Tennessee. Benjamin C. Nance and Samuel D. Smith (Tennessee Division of Archaeology) 8:45 Castalian Springs (40SU14): A Mississippian Chiefdom in the Nashville Basin of Tennessee. Emily L. Beahm and Kevin E. Smith (Middle Tennessee State University) 9:00 Recent Archaeology at the Hermitage. Daniel Brock (The Hermitage) 9:15 Wood’s Mine: Barite Mining in Monroe County, Tennessee. Paul G. Avery (MACTEC Engineering and Consulting) 9:30 Archaeological Investigations at Chucalissa (40SY1): 1940-1955. David H. Dye (University of Memphis) and Ronald C. Brister (Memphis Pink Palace Museum) 9:45 Applied Archaeology at the Hermitage Springs Site (40DV551): A Middle Archaic through Early Woodland Aggregation Site in the Cumberland River Valley. Daniel S. Allen IV (Cumberland Research Group, Inc.) 10:00 What’s Legal and What’s Not: These Artifacts are Mine, I Can Do What I Want With Them. Nick Fielder (Tennessee Division of Archaeology) BREAK 10:15-10:30 10:30 Evolving Landscapes at the Samuel Doak Plantation, Greeneville, Tennessee. Nicholas Honerkamp (University of Tennessee, Chattanooga) 10:45 The Archaeology of Linville Cave (40SL24), Sullivan County, Tennessee. Jay D. Franklin (East Tennessee State University) and S.
    [Show full text]