Rocky Mountain Capshell Snail (Acroloxus Coloradensis): a Technical Conservation Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rocky Mountain Capshell Snail (Acroloxus Coloradensis): a Technical Conservation Assessment Rocky Mountain Capshell Snail (Acroloxus coloradensis): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project January 20, 2005 Tamara Anderson, Ph.D. 1075 S. 2nd Lander, WY 82520 Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Anderson, T. (2005, January 20). Rocky Mountain Capshell Snail (Acroloxus coloradensis): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/ projects/scp/assessments/rockymountaincapshellsnail.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared for the Rocky Mountain Region of the U.S. Forest Service under contract number 53-82X9-3-0060. Several individuals provided unpublished information and/or suggested references. J. Lee supplied a copy of her COSEWIC report. B. Ellis, University of Montana, provided information on her ongoing work. J. Riebesell, University of Michigan-Dearborn, was extremely helpful in answering questions, providing resources, discussing his ongoing work, and providing comments on an early draft. C. Albrecht and I. Picard alerted me to references and current work. D. Lowry, Arapaho National Forest, supplied information on Region 2 Forest Service guidelines. C. Eads provided information on mussels and an ongoing road study. F. Thompson also provided comments on an early draft. AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY Tamara Anderson has studied mollusks for more than 10 years and has spent several years surveying mollusks in South Dakota and Wyoming. She received her Ph.D. in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology from Iowa State University where she studied a federally endangered land snail. She is currently an adjunct curator at the University of Colorado Museum. 2 3 SUMMARY OF KEY COMPONENTS FOR CONSERVATION OF ACROLOXUS COLORADENSIS Status Acroloxus coloradensis (Rocky Mountain capshell snail) is considered a sensitive species in the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region (Region 2). This species is the only representative of Family Acroloxidae that resides in North America. Across its range, A. coloradensis is rare and has widely disjunct populations with some clusters of populations in Quebec, Colorado, and British Columbia. Only six locations are known in Region 2, including populations on the Routt and Roosevelt national forests. Primary Threats Acroloxus coloradensis resides in clean boreal lakes with rocky substrate. Because these lakes are critical habitat, some management activities have the potential to impact these populations. Primary threats include timber harvesting, pesticide application, fisheries management, and some recreational activities. Lowered water levels are a possible cause of the decline in one population. Primary Conservation Elements, Management Implications and Considerations Without information on the status of more of the known populations, it is difficult to manage the species. Additional surveys and monitoring are necessary to better understand the distribution and make fine-scale management decisions. However, it is known that this species evolved under a much narrower range of water quality conditions, less influenced by anthropogenic factors. Therefore, taking conservative routes of maintaining the integrity of aquatic ecosystems and natural processes that influence Acroloxus coloradensis habitat should be strongly considered when planning land management activities. 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................................................2 AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................................................2 SUMMARY OF KEY COMPONENTS FOR CONSERVATION OF ACROLOXUS COLORADENSIS .....................3 Status..........................................................................................................................................................................3 Primary Threats..........................................................................................................................................................3 Primary Conservation Elements, Management Implications and Considerations.....................................................3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................................6 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................7 Goal............................................................................................................................................................................7 Scope..........................................................................................................................................................................7 Treatment of Uncertainty ...........................................................................................................................................7 Application and Interpretation Limits of this Assessment .........................................................................................8 Publication of Assessment on the World Wide Web ..................................................................................................8 Peer Review ...............................................................................................................................................................8 MANAGEMENT STATUS AND NATURAL HISTORY .............................................................................................8 Management Status ....................................................................................................................................................8 Existing Regulatory Mechanisms, Management Plans, and Conservation Elements................................................8 Biology and Ecology..................................................................................................................................................9 Systematics and general species description.........................................................................................................9 Distribution and abundance...................................................................................................................................9 Population trend ..................................................................................................................................................12 Activity patterns and movements........................................................................................................................12 Habitat .................................................................................................................................................................12 Food habits ..........................................................................................................................................................13 Breeding biology.................................................................................................................................................13 Demography........................................................................................................................................................14 Genetic issues .................................................................................................................................................14 Life history .....................................................................................................................................................14 Social pattern for spacing ...............................................................................................................................15 Patterns of dispersal........................................................................................................................................15 Connectivity ...................................................................................................................................................15 Limiting factors ..............................................................................................................................................15 Community ecology ............................................................................................................................................16 Predators.........................................................................................................................................................16 Competitors ....................................................................................................................................................16 Parasites and disease.......................................................................................................................................17 Symbiotic and mutualistic interactions ..........................................................................................................17 Envirogram.....................................................................................................................................................17 CONSERVATION.........................................................................................................................................................17
Recommended publications
  • Land Snails and Soil Calcium in a Central Appalachian Mountain
    Freshwater Snail Inventory of the Fish River Lakes 2/2012 Report for MOHF Agreement Number CT09A 2011 0605 6177 by Kenneth P. Hotopp Appalachian Conservation Biology PO Box 1298, Bethel, ME 04217 for the Maine Outdoor Heritage Fund 37 Wiscasset Rd. Pittston, ME 04345 Freshwater Snail Inventory of the Fish River Lakes Abstract Freshwater snails were inventoried at the eight major lakes of the Fish River watershed, Aroostook County, Maine, with special attention toward pond snails (Lymnaeidae) collected historically by regional naturalist Olof Nylander. A total of fourteen freshwater snail species in six families were recovered. The pond snail Stagnicola emarginatus (Say, 1821) was found at Square Lake, Eagle Lake, and Fish River Lake, with different populations exhibiting regional shell forms as observed by Nylander, but not found in three other lakes previously reported. More intensive inventory is necessary for confirmation. The occurrence of transitional shell forms, and authoritative literature, do not support the elevation of the endemic species Stagnicola mighelsi (W.G. Binney, 1865). However, the infrequent occurrence of S. emarginatus in all of its forms, and potential threats to this species, warrant a statewide assessment of its habitat and conservation status. Otherwise, a qualitative comparison with the Fish River Lakes freshwater snail fauna of 100 years ago suggests it remains mostly intact today. 1 Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................ 1
    [Show full text]
  • The New Zealand Mud Snail Potamopyrgus Antipodarum (J.E
    BioInvasions Records (2019) Volume 8, Issue 2: 287–300 CORRECTED PROOF Research Article The New Zealand mud snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (J.E. Gray, 1853) (Tateidae, Mollusca) in the Iberian Peninsula: temporal patterns of distribution Álvaro Alonso1,*, Pilar Castro-Díez1, Asunción Saldaña-López1 and Belinda Gallardo2 1Departamento de Ciencias de la Vida, Unidad Docente de Ecología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain 2Department of Biodiversity and Restoration. Pyrenean Institute of Ecology (IPE-CSIC). Avda. Montaña 1005, 50059, Zaragoza, Spain Author e-mails: [email protected] (ÁA), [email protected] (PCD), [email protected] (ASL), [email protected] (BG) *Corresponding author Citation: Alonso Á, Castro-Díez P, Saldaña-López A, Gallardo B (2019) The Abstract New Zealand mud snail Potamopyrgus antipodarum (J.E. Gray, 1853) (Tateidae, Invasive exotic species (IES) are one of the most important threats to aquatic Mollusca) in the Iberian Peninsula: ecosystems. To ensure the effective management of these species, a comprehensive temporal patterns of distribution. and thorough knowledge on the current species distribution is necessary. One of BioInvasions Records 8(2): 287–300, those species is the New Zealand mudsnail (NZMS), Potamopyrgus antipodarum https://doi.org/10.3391/bir.2019.8.2.11 (J.E. Gray, 1853) (Tateidae, Mollusca), which is invasive in many parts of the Received: 7 September 2018 world. The current knowledge on the NZMS distribution in the Iberian Peninsula is Accepted: 4 February 2019 limited to presence/absence information per province, with poor information at the Published: 29 April 2019 watershed scale. The present study aims to: 1) update the distribution of NZMS in Handling editor: Elena Tricarico the Iberian Peninsula, 2) describe its temporal changes, 3) identify the invaded habitats, Thematic editor: David Wong and 4) assess the relation between its abundance and the biological quality of fluvial systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Wo 2008/134510 A2
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (43) International Publication Date (10) International Publication Number 6 November 2008 (06.11.2008) PCT WO 2008/134510 A2 (51) International Patent Classification: (74) Agents: WOLIN, Harris, A. et al; Myers Wolin LLC, AOlN 45/00 (2006.01) AOlN 43/04 (2006.01) 100 Headquarters Plaza, North Tower, 6th Floor, Morris- AOlN 65/00 (2006.01) town, NJ 07960-6834 (US). (21) International Application Number: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every PCT/US2008/061577 kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT,AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, (22) International Filing Date: 25 April 2008 (25.04.2008) CH, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FT, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, (25) Filing Language: English IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, (26) Publication Language: English MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, SV, (30) Priority Data: SY, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, 11/740,275 25 April 2007 (25.04.2007) US ZA, ZM, ZW (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): DICTUC (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every S.A. [CUCL]; Rut 96.691.330-4, Avda Vicuna Mackenna kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 4860, Macul, Santiago, 7820436 (CL).
    [Show full text]
  • Potamopyrgus Antipodarum POTANT/EEI/NA009 (Gray, 1843)
    CATÁLOGO ESPAÑOL DE ESPECIES EXÓTICAS INVASORAS Potamopyrgus antipodarum POTANT/EEI/NA009 (Gray, 1843) Castellano: Caracol del cieno Nombre vulgar Catalán: Cargol hidròbid; Euskera: Zeelanda berriko lokatzetako barraskiloa Grupo taxonómico: Fauna Posición taxonómica Phylum: Mollusca Clase: Gastropoda Orden: Littorinimorpha Familia: Hydrobiidae Observaciones Sinonimias: taxonómicas Hydrobia jenkinsi (Smith, 1889), Potamopyrgus jenkinsi (Smith, 1889) Resumen de su situación e Especie con gran capacidad de colonización y alta tasa impacto en España reproductiva, que produce poblaciones muy abundantes, produciendo una modificación de la cadena trófica de los ecosistemas acuáticos; desplazamiento y competencia con especies autóctonas e impacto en las infraestructuras acuáticas. Normativa nacional Catálogo Español de Especies Exóticas Invasoras Norma: Real Decreto 630/2013, de 2 de agosto. Fecha: (BOE nº 185 ): 03.08.2013 Normativa autonómica - Normativa europea - La Comisión Europea está elaborando una legislación sobre especies exóticas invasoras según lo establecido en la actuación 16 (crear un instrumento especial relativo a las especies exóticas invasoras) de la “Estrategia de la UE sobre la biodiversidad hasta 2020: nuestro seguro de vida y capital natural” COM (2011) 244 final, para colmar las lagunas que existen en la política de lucha contra las especies exóticas invasoras. Acuerdos y Convenios - Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica (CBD), 1992. internacionales - Convenio relativo a la conservación de la vida silvestre y del medio natural de Europa. Berna 1979.- Estrategia Europea sobre Especies Exóticas Invasoras (2004). - Convenio internacional para el control y gestión de las aguas de lastre y sedimentos de los buques. Potamopyrgus antipodarum Página 1 de 3 Listas y Atlas de Mundial Especies Exóticas - Base de datos del Grupo Especialista de Especies Invasoras Invasoras (ISSG), formado dentro de la Comisión de Supervivencia de Especies (SSC) de la UICN.
    [Show full text]
  • Metacommunities and Biodiversity Patterns in Mediterranean Temporary Ponds: the Role of Pond Size, Network Connectivity and Dispersal Mode
    METACOMMUNITIES AND BIODIVERSITY PATTERNS IN MEDITERRANEAN TEMPORARY PONDS: THE ROLE OF POND SIZE, NETWORK CONNECTIVITY AND DISPERSAL MODE Irene Tornero Pinilla Per citar o enllaçar aquest document: Para citar o enlazar este documento: Use this url to cite or link to this publication: http://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/670096 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/deed.ca Aquesta obra està subjecta a una llicència Creative Commons Reconeixement- NoComercial Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence DOCTORAL THESIS Metacommunities and biodiversity patterns in Mediterranean temporary ponds: the role of pond size, network connectivity and dispersal mode Irene Tornero Pinilla 2020 DOCTORAL THESIS Metacommunities and biodiversity patterns in Mediterranean temporary ponds: the role of pond size, network connectivity and dispersal mode IRENE TORNERO PINILLA 2020 DOCTORAL PROGRAMME IN WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY SUPERVISED BY DR DANI BOIX MASAFRET DR STÉPHANIE GASCÓN GARCIA Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements to obtain the Degree of Doctor at the University of Girona Dr Dani Boix Masafret and Dr Stéphanie Gascón Garcia, from the University of Girona, DECLARE: That the thesis entitled Metacommunities and biodiversity patterns in Mediterranean temporary ponds: the role of pond size, network connectivity and dispersal mode submitted by Irene Tornero Pinilla to obtain a doctoral degree has been completed under our supervision. In witness thereof, we hereby sign this document. Dr Dani Boix Masafret Dr Stéphanie Gascón Garcia Girona, 22nd November 2019 A mi familia Caminante, son tus huellas el camino y nada más; Caminante, no hay camino, se hace camino al andar.
    [Show full text]
  • Change of Status and Name for a Hawaiian
    Published online: 11 August 2016 ISSN (online): 2376-3191 Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 2015. Edited by Neal L. Evenhuis. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 118: 5 –8 (2016) Change of Status and Name for a Hawaiian Freshwater Limpet : Ancylus sharpi Sykes , 1900 , is the Invasive North American Ferrissia californica (Rowell , 1863) , Formerly Known as Ferrissia fragilis (Tryon , 1863) (Gastropoda : Planorbidae : Ancylinae) 1 CARl C. C HRISteNSeN 2 Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawaiʻi 96817-2704, USA; email: [email protected] the freshwater limpet heretofore known as Ferrissia sharpi (Sykes, 1900) was described as Ancylus sharpi from material collected on the Island of O‘ahu (Sykes 1900). the dis - cussion of the species by Hubendick (1967) added little new information, but by the end of the 20th century it had been reported from the islands of Kauaʻi and Hawaiʻi in addition to its type locality (Cowie et al. 1995; Cowie 1997). Recent surveys of Hawaiian stream fauna have recorded it from numerous localities on those islands and have added the islands of Moloka‘i and Maui to its known range within the state of Hawaiʻi (englund & Godwin 2002; englund & Preston 2002; Anthony et al . 2004; Brasher et al. 2004; Parham et al . 2008). Ferrissia sharpi has been a cryptogenic species in the Hawaiian fauna as its status as native or introduced has been unclear. Most recent authors have regarded its status as uncertain (Cowie et al. 1995; Cowie 1997, 1998; englund & Godwin 2002; englund & Preston 2002; Ziegler 2002; Anthony et al . 2004; Brasher et al. 2004), but Parham et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Snails of the Snake and Green River Basins of Wyoming
    Aquatic snails of the Snake and Green River Basins of Wyoming Lusha Tronstad Invertebrate Zoologist Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming 307-766-3115 [email protected] Mark Andersen Information Systems and Services Coordinator Wyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming 307-766-3036 [email protected] Suggested citation: Tronstad, L.M. and M. D. Andersen. 2018. Aquatic snails of the Snake and Green River Basins of Wyoming. Report prepared by the Wyoming Natural Diversity Database for the Wyoming Fish and Wildlife Department. 1 Abstract Freshwater snails are a diverse group of mollusks that live in a variety of aquatic ecosystems. Many snail species are of conservation concern around the globe. About 37-39 species of aquatic snails likely live in Wyoming. The current study surveyed the Snake and Green River basins in Wyoming and identified 22 species and possibly discovered a new operculate snail. We surveyed streams, wetlands, lakes and springs throughout the basins at randomly selected locations. We measured habitat characteristics and basic water quality at each site. Snails were usually most abundant in ecosystems with higher standing stocks of algae, on solid substrate (e.g., wood or aquatic vegetation) and in habitats with slower water velocity (e.g., backwater and margins of streams). We created an aquatic snail key for identifying species in Wyoming. The key is a work in progress that will be continually updated to reflect changes in taxonomy and new knowledge. We hope the snail key will be used throughout the state to unify snail identification and create better data on Wyoming snails.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limpet Form in Gastropods: Evolution, Distribution, and Implications for the Comparative Study of History
    UC Davis UC Davis Previously Published Works Title The limpet form in gastropods: Evolution, distribution, and implications for the comparative study of history Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8p93f8z8 Journal Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 120(1) ISSN 0024-4066 Author Vermeij, GJ Publication Date 2017 DOI 10.1111/bij.12883 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2016, , – . With 1 figure. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2017, 120 , 22–37. With 1 figures 2 G. J. VERMEIJ A B The limpet form in gastropods: evolution, distribution, and implications for the comparative study of history GEERAT J. VERMEIJ* Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA,USA C D Received 19 April 2015; revised 30 June 2016; accepted for publication 30 June 2016 The limpet form – a cap-shaped or slipper-shaped univalved shell – convergently evolved in many gastropod lineages, but questions remain about when, how often, and under which circumstances it originated. Except for some predation-resistant limpets in shallow-water marine environments, limpets are not well adapted to intense competition and predation, leading to the prediction that they originated in refugial habitats where exposure to predators and competitors is low. A survey of fossil and living limpets indicates that the limpet form evolved independently in at least 54 lineages, with particularly frequent origins in early-diverging gastropod clades, as well as in Neritimorpha and Heterobranchia. There are at least 14 origins in freshwater and 10 in the deep sea, E F with known times ranging from the Cambrian to the Neogene.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interactive Effects of Predators, Resources, and Disturbance On
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School 4-23-2010 The nI teractive Effects of Predators, Resources, and Disturbance on Freshwater Snail Populations from the Everglades Clifton B. Ruehl Florida International University, [email protected] DOI: 10.25148/etd.FI10080412 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons, Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Population Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Ruehl, Clifton B., "The nI teractive Effects of Predators, Resources, and Disturbance on Freshwater Snail Populations from the Everglades" (2010). FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 266. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/266 This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY Miami, Florida THE INTERACTIVE EFFECTS OF PREDATORS, RESOURCES, AND DISTURBANCE ON FRESHWATER SNAIL POPULATIONS FROM THE EVERGLADES A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in BIOLOGY by Clifton Benjamin Ruehl 2010 To: Dean Kenneth Furton choose the name of dean of your college/school College of Arts and Sciences choose the name of your college/school This dissertation, written by Clifton Benjamin Ruehl, and entitled The Interactive Effects of Predators, Resources, and Disturbance on Freshwater Snail Populations from the Everglades, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual content, is referred to you for judgment.
    [Show full text]
  • Synergistic Effects of Predators and Trematode Parasites on Larval Green Frog (Rana Clamitans) Survival
    Ecology, 94(12), 2013, pp. 2697–2708 Ó 2013 by the Ecological Society of America Synergistic effects of predators and trematode parasites on larval green frog (Rana clamitans) survival 1 JOHN A. MARINO,JR., AND EARL E. WERNER Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 830 N. University Ave., Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1048 USA Abstract. Parasites and predators can have complex, nonadditive effects on a shared group of victims, which can have important consequences for population dynamics. In particular, parasites can alter host traits that influence predation risk, and predators can have nonconsumptive effects on prey traits which influence susceptibility (i.e., infection intensity and tolerance) to parasites. Here, we examined the combined effects of trematode parasites (Digenea: Echinostomatidae) and odonate (Anax) predators on the survival of larval green frogs (Rana clamitans). First, in a large-scale mesocosm experiment, we manipulated the presence or absence of parasites in combination with the presence of no predator, caged predators, or free predators, and measured survival, traits, and infection. Parasites, caged predators, and free predators decreased survival, and we found a strong negative synergistic effect of parasites in combination with free predators on survival. Importantly, we then examined the potential mechanisms that explain the observed synergistic effect of parasites and predators in a series of follow-up experiments. Results of the follow-up experiments suggest that increased predation susceptibility due to elevated activity levels in the presence of free-swimming parasite infective stages (i.e., an avoidance response) is the most likely mechanism responsible for the observed synergism. These results suggest a potential trade-off in susceptibility to parasites and predators, which can drive nonadditive effects that may have important consequences for natural enemy interactions in natural populations and amphibian conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Gut Bacterial Communities in the Freshwater Snail Planorbella Trivolvis and Their Modification by a Non-Herbivorous Diet
    Gut bacterial communities in the freshwater snail Planorbella trivolvis and their modification by a non-herbivorous diet Zongfu Hu1,2, Qing Tong2, Jie Chang1, Jianhua Yu1, Shuguo Li1, Huaxin Niu1 and Deying Ma2 1 College of Animal Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao, People’s Republic of China 2 College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China ABSTRACT The freshwater pulmonate snail Planorbella trivolvis is a common species in various bodies of water but is not native to China. Planorbella trivolvis usually live on diets with high fiber content, such as water grasses, algae and fallen leaves. These snails can attach to the wall of a water tank or to water grass and can be transported overseas to China through the ornamental fish trade. There are few studies investigating the intestinal microbiota of freshwater snails. In this study, using culture-independent molecular analysis, we assessed for the first time the complexity of bacterial communities in the intestines of reared snails. The intestinal microbiota in the snails fed different diets, that is, herbivorous feed (HV) with high cellulose and non-herbivorous feed (NHV) with low cellulose, were analyzed by Illumina sequencing. The results showed that the NHV-based diet significantly increased the body mass, shell diameter and specific growth rate of the snails after 60 days of rearing (P < 0.05). Histological experiments showed that the fat droplets in the epithelium columnar cells of the intestines of the NHV snails increased, and the cilia on these cells fell off. The sequencing results identified 486 and 195 OTUs in HV and Submitted 9 July 2020 NHV, respectively.
    [Show full text]