DOCSLIB.ORG

Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust: Annual Report and Accounts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust: Annual Report and Accounts Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18 Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017/18 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 7, paragraph 25 (4) (a) of the National Health Service Act 2006 ©2018 Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Contents Performance report 05 06 Overview 26 Performance analysis About The Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust Key performance measures and meeting standards The Royal Free London group Financial review A word from our chairman and chief executive Improving our environment Our objectives Our 2017/18 highlights Accountability report 39 40 Directors’ report 98 Staff report 43 Disclosures as set out in the NHS foundation Workforce overview trust code of governance Staff survey The role of the trust board Equality, diversity and human rights The Royal Free London group and its committee structures 111 Single oversight framework Audit committee annual report 2017/18 114 Annual governance statement Council of governors Patient care 90 Remuneration report 123 Annual accounts 173 Quality report 174 Part one: embedding quality 269 Annexes Statement on quality from the chief executive Annex 1: statements from commissioners, Our trust: Implementing a group model to deliver world local Healthwatch organisations and overview class expertise with local care for a larger population and scrutiny committee Annex 2: statement of directors’ responsibilities i 186 Part two: priorities for improvement and n respect of the quality report statement of assurance from the board Annex 3: limited assurance statement from Priorities for improvement external auditors Statements of assurance from the board 280 Appendices Reporting against core indicators Appendix a: changes made to the quality report 239 Part three: review of quality performance Appendix b: glossary of definitions and terms Overview of the quality of care in 2017/18 used in the report Performance against key national indicators Our plans 4 Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18 Performance report 06 Overview 06 About the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust 08 Welcome to the Royal Free London group 14 A word from our chairman and chief executive 17 Our objectives 20 Our 2017/18 highlights 26 Performance analysis 26 Key performance measures and meeting standards 30 Financial review 34 Improving our environment Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18 5 Overview This section is a summary of the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (RFL) – our purpose, our objectives, details about any key risks to the achievement of those objectives, and information about how we performed during 2017/18. About the Royal Free London 1828 The Royal Free Hospital was founded 189 years ago in 1828 to provide free healthcare to those who could not afford medical treatment. 1837 The title ‘Royal’ was granted by Queen Victoria in recognition of the hospital’s work with cholera 1887 patients. The Royal Free Hospital was the first hospital in London to accept women medical students. 1991 In April 1991, the Royal Free became one of the first NHS trusts. 2012 The hospital was authorised as a foundation trust under the name the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust. 2014 In July 2014 Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals NHS Trust became part of the Royal Free London. 2016 The trust receives a ‘good’ rating from the Care Quality Commission. 2017 The Royal Free London group is established and North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust joins us as our first clinical partner. 6 Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18 / Performance report Our work and activities The Royal Free London is one of the largest hospital trusts in the country, employing more than 10,000 staff and serving 1.6 million patients across 20 sites in north London and Hertfordshire. We attract patients from across the country and beyond to our specialist services in liver and kidney transplantation, haemophilia, HIV, infectious diseases, plastic surgery, immunology, neurology, Parkinson’s disease, vascular surgery, cardiology, amyloidosis and scleroderma. We are a member of the academic health science partnership UCL Partners, which brings people and organisations together to transform the health and wellbeing of the population. The Royal Free Hospital provides the only high-level isolation unit of its kind for the care of patients with the Ebola virus and other infectious diseases. The trust is a member of the academic health science partnership, UCL Partners. Key issues and risks The board assurance framework has been re-organised to align the risks with the Royal Free London group goals and the committees responsible for managing those risks. The framework describes the risks and mitigations in place, sources of board assurance and actions required for each risk. See page 59. World class care values All of our staff are expected to treat our patients, visitors and each other in line with our world class care values which expect us to be: • positively welcoming • actively respectful • clearly communicating • visibly reassuring Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18 / Performance report 7 Welcome to the Royal Free London group Our staff are doing a fantastic job under growing pressure - treating more people than ever before. To manage this increasing demand we need to think differently about the way we deliver our services. For far too long, hospitals and other healthcare services have worked independently - collaboration and partnership working has to be the way forward. We have the opportunity of a generation… We have been given the opportunity of a generation to improve the care we deliver to our patients through the NHS vanguard programme. We have been chosen to set up and lead a group of NHS providers who will share services and resources in order to improve the experience of our staff and patients. To deliver on this opportunity, the Royal Free London group was established in July 2017. by doing things differently… We will have a new operational structure with: • local hospital management teams in place at our three main hospitals: Barnet Hospital, Chase Farm Hospital and the Royal Free Hospital • new divisional structures • a group board and group executive team which sets the strategy for the group. and collaborating with our partners… Working side-by-side with other healthcare experts we can share ways of working which we know deliver the best outcomes. By working collectively we can reduce variations in patient care and the cost of treatment that we see across the group, increasing our purchasing power. We will also be able to share services which are essential to the day-to- day running of a hospital. By working at a larger scale, teams such as HR and finance can support a group of hospitals, rather than just one. This means we can improve efficiency and have more money to invest in patient care. 8 Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18 / Performance report we will lead a group of NHS providers… Our plan proposes to bring together a range of acute providers to create a ‘group’ of hospitals, connected by a single group centre – similar to models seen internationally, such as Intermountain Healthcare in Utah, USA. Individual trusts will be able to join the group under a range of membership options, from full membership to arrangements such as buddying. to transform the experience of our staff and our patients. By working as a group, we can bring together larger numbers of clinicians to share their knowledge about the very best ways to treat patients in line with the very best care available across the globe. At the heart of this approach are clinical practice groups, or CPGs. CPGs are clinically led ways of working across several hospital sites aimed at reducing variation and ensuring all patients receive the best standard of care, wherever they are treated. Hospital teams come together to design pathways – that is the way a patient is treated in hospital for a particular health issue. They work to ensure diagnostic and treatment decisions are consistent and based on the latest evidence to deliver the best possible outcome for patients. CPGs also ensure that staff are working at the top of their capability. A consultant will not always be the most appropriate medic for a patient to see. Nurses and therapists are being empowered to see more patients and make clinical decisions, freeing up consultants to see the cases where a specialist opinion is required. This improves the time in which a patient is seen and overall patient satisfaction and outcomes. The Royal Free London has four CPGs: • Women’s and children’s • Medical and urgent care • Transplant and specialist services • Surgery and associated services These four areas were chosen by the RFL group executive team, division leads and clinicians as they met certain criteria. They are: priority areas for the group; high cost; high volume; and areas with widespread, unwarranted variation. Unwarranted variation refers to differences in the way a patient is treated - both within the individual hospitals and between the sites - without there being any improvement on the outcome. This can result in inefficiencies and variations in outcomes for patients. Within each CPG there are between five to nine different pathways, for different areas of care, where we are working to smooth out variation by using the latest evidence to improve care for patients. How we are working with North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust (NMUH) joined Royal Free London group in September 2017 as our first clinical partner. As a clinical partner, NMUH will work alongside the RFL to ensure there are consistent approaches to designing and delivering care, based on evidence and best practice – nationally and internationally. The partnership is the culmination of more than two years of close working between the Royal Free London and NMUH.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prescribing in a Paediatric Emergency: a PERUKI Survey of Prescribing and Resuscitation Aids
    Received: 3 July 2020 | Revised: 3 August 2020 | Accepted: 20 August 2020 DOI: 10.1111/apa.15551 REGULAR ARTICLE Prescribing in a paediatric emergency: A PERUKI survey of prescribing and resuscitation aids Haiko Kurt Jahn1,2 | Ingo Henry Johannes Jahn3 | Damian Roland4 | Wilhelm Behringer5 | Mark Lyttle6,7 | Paediatric Emergency Research in the United Kingdom, Ireland (PERUKI) 1Emergency Department, Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast, UK Abstract 2Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Aim: The aim was to investigate the use of paper-based and electronic prescribing Germany and resuscitation aids in paediatric emergency care from a departmental and indi- 3School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Queensland, Brisbane, vidual physician perspective. Australia Methods: A two-stage web-based self-report questionnaire was performed. In stage 4 Emergency Department, Leicester Royal (i), a lead investigator at PERUKI sites completed a department-level survey; in stage Infirmary, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK (ii), individual physicians recorded their personal practice. 5Centre for Emergency Medicine, University Results: The site survey was completed by 46/54 (85%) of PERUKI sites. 198 physi- of Jena, Jena, Germany cians completed the individual physicians' survey. Individual physicians selected the 6Emergency Department, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK use of formulary apps for checking of medication dosages nearly as often as hard- 7Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, copy formularies. The APLS WETFLAG calculation and hardcopy aids were widely ac- University of the West of England, Bristol, cepted in both surveys. A third of sites accepted and half of the individual physicians UK selected resuscitation apps on the personal mobile device as paediatric resuscitation Correspondence aids.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Free Quality Accounts 2017/18
    Quality report 174 Part one: Embedding quality 174 1.1 Statement on quality from the chief executive 175 1.2 Our trust: delivering world class expertise with local care for a larger population 186 Part two: Priorities for improvement and statements of assurance from the board 186 2.1 Priorities for improvement 211 2.2 Statements of assurance from the board 229 2.3 Reporting against core indicators 239 Part three: review of quality performance 239 3.1 Overview of the quality of care in 2017/18 243 3.2 Performance against key national indicators 264 3.3 Our plans 269 Annexes 269 Annex 1: Statements from commissioners, local Healthwatch organisations and overview and scrutiny committee 276 Annex 2: Statement of directors’ responsibilities in respect of the quality report 277 Annex 3: Limited assurance statement from external auditors 280 Appendices 280 Appendix a: Changes made to the quality report 281 Appendix b: Glossary of definitions and terms used in the eportr Annual Report and Accounts 2017/18 / Quality report 173 Part one: Embedding quality 1.1 Statement on quality from the chief executive This report is designed to assure our mothers and babies together after The quality report includes our high local population, our patients and our birth; and by standardising the way level priorities for the coming year and commissioners that we provide high we treat patients who require knee an assessment of our performance last quality clinical care to our patients. It also operations, we can greatly reduce how year. There have been some particular shows where we could perform better long patients have to stay in hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Planned Orthopaedic Surgery for Adults in North Central
    Improving planned orthopaedic surgery for adults in north central London 13 January to 6 April 2020 We are proposing changes to planned surgery for bones, joints and muscles (planned orthopaedic surgery) for adults. This includes hip and knee replacements; and other surgery of hips, knees, shoulders, elbows, feet, ankles and hands. Any changes could affect residents of Barnet, Camden, Enfield, Haringey and Islington and neighbouring boroughs. We need your comments and advice. Closing date for feedback 6 April 2020 A consultation document published by North London Partners in health and care on behalf of Barnet, Camden, Enfield, Haringey and Islington clinical commissioning groups. Introduction Helen Pettersen Prof Fares Haddad North London Partners in Clinical Lead for the review, Clinical Director of the Health and Care Convenor and Institute of Sport and Exercise Health and a Consultant accountable officer of NCL’s Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeon at University College five CCGs London Hospitals North London Partners in health and care was established to tackle As a surgeon, who provides this kind of care every day, I know the Hospitals across north central London have some of the big health and care challenges we face in the coming difference it makes to patients. Damage to bones, joints and muscles years. We are a partnership of health and care organisations who are can be debilitating for people of all ages - whether it is a result of proposed a new way to organise orthopaedic working together to find solutions to address these challenges. Our ageing or trauma - but with the right care at the right time, the review of orthopaedic services is a good example of this.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Mr GD Hildebrand
    Curriculum vitae Mr GD Hildebrand BM BCH (Oxon) MPhil (Cantab) MD (USA) FEBO (Paris) FRCS (Edinburgh) FRCOphth (London) Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon and Paediatric Ophthalmologist King Edward VII Hospital, Windsor Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading West Berkshire Community Hospital, Newbury 1 Personal information / contact details: Mr. G. Darius Hildebrand BM BCH DCH MD MPhil FEBO FRCSEd FRCOphth General Consultant Ophthalmic Surgeon Paediatric Ophthalmology Specialist for Berkshire Prince Charles Eye Unit King Edward VII Hospital Medical Schools and Universities: 1994-97 Oxford University, U.K. Magdalen College, Oxford Clinical Medicine 1992-93 Cambridge University, U.K. Gonville & Caius College, Cambridge Molecular Pathology 1990-92 Dartmouth Medical School, USA 1993-94/97 Pre-/Clinical Medicine 1986-90 Brown University, USA Biology (with honours) 1986-90 Brown University, USA Modern History 1987 Université de Paris La Sorbonne, Paris summer Certificat (French, niveau supérieur) 1986 Harvard University Summer School summer Boston, Massachussetts, USA Biology 2 Academic qualifications: 2009 FRCOphth Royal College of Ophthalmologists, London 2007 CCT Certificate of Completion of Training 2007 GMC Full specialist registration, General Medical Council, London 2007 FRCS Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh (Ophthalmology) 2005 FEBO European Board of Ophthalmology, Paris 2001 MRCOphth Royal College of Ophthalmologists, London 2001 MRCS Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh 2000 DCH Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, London 1994-97
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of 30-Day Mortality for 500 Patients Undergoing Non
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.10.20115543; this version posted June 12, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license . Title: Evaluation of 30-day mortality for 500 patients undergoing non-emergency surgery in a COVID-19 cold site within a multicentre regional surgical network during the COVID- 19 pandemic Veeru Kasivisvanathan, PhDa,b,λ Jamie Lindsay, MBBSa,λ, Sara Rakshani-Moghadam, MBBSa, Ahmed Elhamshary, MB BCha, Konstantinos Kapriniotis, MDa, Georgios Kazantzis, MSca, , Bilal Syed, MBBSa, John Hines, FRCSa, Axel Bex, PhDc, Daniel Heffernan Ho, FRCRd, Martin Hayward, FRCSe, Chetan Bhan, FRCSf, Nicola MacDonald, FRCOGg, Simon Clarke, FRCA,h, David Walker, FRCAb,i, Geoff Bellingan, PhDi, James Moore, MBAj, Jennifer Rohn, PhDk, Asif Muneer, FRCSa,b,l, Lois Roberts, BAm, Fares Haddad, FRCSb, John D Kelly, FRCSa,b, UCLH study group collaborators^ λThese authors share joint first authorship ^PubMed Indexed Collaborators: UCLH study group collaborators: Tarek Ezzatt Abdel-Aziz, Clare Allen, Sian Allen, Hussain Alnajjar, Daniella Andrich, Vimoshan Arumuham, Naaila Aslam, Ravi Barod, Rosie Batty, Timothy Briggs, Eleanor Brockbank, Manish Chand, Simon Choong, Nim Christopher, Justin Collins, James Crosbie, Louise Dickinson, Konstantinos Doufekas, Mark Feneley, Tamsin Greenwell, Alistair Grey, Rizwan Hamid, John Hines, Julie
    [Show full text]
  • The Royal Free Association
    E L FR E H THE ROYAL FREE A O Y S O P R I T E A L H T • • ASSOCIATION L ONDON (Incorporating the Royal Free Old Students’ Association and Members of the School) 2016 Newsletter Contents President’s Report 2 President’s Report 3 Programme It is a great pleasure and privilege to have been stimulating group of Trust staff in the morning, and the invited to be President of the Royal Free Association. Peter Scheuer Symposium in the afternoon. We have 5 Minutes Of The Annual General Meeting Although not a graduate of the Royal Free, I have long- invited several inspirational ex-students and staff to 7 Apologies For Absence standing links to the Royal Free School of Medical as take part in the Symposium, and we look forward to a 8 Financial Report a Clinical Academic and to the Hospital, having been stimulating day. 9 Notices appointed first as Registrar to Professor Dame Sheila Sherlock in 1977. I remained at the Royal Free to We were delighted earlier this year to welcome 10 Triennial Dinner complete my MD Thesis and after 2 years of research Dr Alex Nesbit from the Royal Free, University 11 The Deans’ Portraits in the USA returned as a Lecturer and then Senior College and Middlesex Students (RUMS) Committee 15 Members’ Contributions Lecturer on the Liver Unit. I count myself lucky to have and further meetings have developed links to the worked at the Medical School and Hospital, both of Association which we believe will be fruitful for both 19 Student Elective Reports which have reputations for being among the friendliest organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Organisational Overview
    EASTMAN DENTAL INSTITUTE Organisational Overview UCL Eastman Dental Institute (EDI) is a division within the Faculty of Medical Science (FMS) which is part of the School of Life and Medical Sciences (SLMS) at University College London (UCL). According to the QS ranking, it is consistently rated as one of the top ten dental schools in the world. It is the largest postgraduate dental school in Europe and has a reputation as one of the world’s leading academic centres for dentistry. EDI’s main activities are research and education in the field of oral healthcare sciences. Our mission encompasses education, academic enquiry and the advancement of knowledge with the aim of: • Benefiting society by encouraging a healthy lifestyle, preventing oral disease, and improving patient care by application of education, research and clinical skills. • Providing the highest quality educational and training experiences for graduates on taught and research programmes. • Advancing the dental profession. EDI works closely in the furtherance of its mission with the Eastman Dental Hospital (EDH), part of University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH), and other local healthcare providers. In October 2019, EDI will be relocating from its present locations at 123 and 256 Grays Inn Road to new premises on the Bloomsbury and Royal Free Hospital campuses. The clinical and teaching functions will be moving to refurbished accommodation in Bloomsbury that will provide the most up-to-date facilities for students and staff in close proximity to the new Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals in Huntley Street. Research activities at EDI, other than that involving direct contact with patients and human subjects, will be relocating to state-of-the-art facilities within the UCL Campus on the Royal Free Hospital site in Hampstead, London.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter-From-Moorfields-Hes.Pdf
    Moorfields at City Road 162 City Road London EC1V 2PD Tel: 020 7253 3411 29th January 2020 Dear Optometrists, 1. Moorfields A&E has seen a significant rise in patients being sent from community optometrists, often from very long distances, where closer emergency ophthalmic provision is available. In many cases, patients are sent to A&E without any discussion or referral letter. An internal audit revealed that 40% of emergency referrals to A&E do not require an A&E attendance. 2. We have also seen a large rise in Optometrist referrals (GOS-18) to GPs asking for 1-2 week appointments which GPs are unable to obtain. These patients are frequently sent to A&E, which then doubles the cost to CCGs (as the A&E attendance and subsequent clinic review are both charged for separately). Such cases are usually inappropriate for A&E review. Should you need to make such a request, please do not send them to A&E. It is usually better to telephone your local eye unit and ask for the most appropriate pathway for the patient (e.g. AMD, Glaucoma Pathway etc). 3. As it is local CCGs who foot the bill for such attendances, we will need to feedback directly to them. Please remember that A&E is for genuine and potentially sight threatening emergencies only. 4. We have also seen an increase in patients being sent to us while already under the care of other units requesting second opinions. We do not offer second opinions in the A&E department, and as such, patients will be reverted back to the original referrer.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Your Blood Test Online @ Royal Free Hospital
    Book your blood test online @ Royal Free Hospital Information for patients From 21 November 2019, the Royal Free Hospital, part of the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, adult blood test service will be by appointment. This leaflet sets out how you can book a blood test at the Royal Free Hospital. How can I book a blood test? You can book your blood test online from 1 November 2019, for appointments on and after 21 November 2019. This is a free booking service. Please follow the steps below to book your test online: 1. Go to: www.royalfree.nhs.uk/adult-blood-tests and click on the link to the booking system 2. Select your appointment type. 3. Choose the time you would like to come in. 4. Register your details (please note that you will only have to do this the first time you book a blood test and you can use the same log-in details if you need to book another test later). What do I do if I cannot book my blood test online? If you are unable to book your blood test online, please call the trust to make your appointment on: 020 7443 9757 (Monday to Friday, 8am to 5pm). Normal call charges will apply. What are the opening hours for the blood testing service? The opening times remain as: 7.30am to 5.30pm, Monday to Friday 8am to 1pm, Saturdays Other blood test services at the Royal Free London We also provide blood test services at Barnet Hospital and Chase Farm Hospital.
    [Show full text]
  • UCL Library Services
    Dr. Paul Ayris Dr. Tiberius Ignat Pro-Vice-Provost (UCL Library Services) Managing Director Co-Chair of the LERU INFO Community Scientific Knowledge Services Adviser to the LIBER Board www.knowledge.services e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] Content ❑ The scope of Open Science ❑ Open Access ❑ Research Data Management ❑ European Open Science Cloud ❑ Citizen Science ❑ Conclusions Plaster Relief by John Flaxman, Flaxman Gallery, UCL The Three Major Shifts of Open Science ❑ How scientists collaborate to create knowledge » RDM, EOSC, ERA ERIC ❑ How scientists find meaning in knowledge » Ex. The International HapMap Project ❑ A change in the relationship Science – Society » OA, Citizen Science, Open Days, Pop Science UCL LIBRARY SERVICES Content ❑ The scope of Open Science ❑ Open Access ❑ Research Data Management ❑ European Open Science Cloud ❑ Citizen Science ❑ Conclusions Plaster Relief by John Flaxman, Flaxman Gallery, UCL UCL LIBRARY SERVICES What is Open Science? ❑Open Science is the movement to make scientific research, data and dissemination accessible at all levels of an enquiring society UCL LIBRARY SERVICES Open Science a paradigm shift in the modus operandi of research and science impacting the entire scientific process Characteristics Research Cycle Citizen Science Open code Conceptualization Pre-print Data Gathering Open Access Alternative Reputation Systems Analysis Collaborative Bibliographies Science Blogs Review Open Annotation Open Data Publication Open Lab Books/Workflows Data Intensive
    [Show full text]
  • Camden CCG Enables Joined-Up Care by Delivering an Integrated Digital Care Record Across Health and Social Care
    Camden CCG enables joined-up care by delivering an Integrated Digital Care Record across health and social care Orion Health Case Study: Camden Clinical Commissioning Group London www.camdenccg.nhs.uk/ The Customer Customer Name NHS Camden Clinical Commissioning Group Camden Clinical Commissioning Group (NHS Camden CCG) was formally created in 2013 to commission the delivery of healthcare Location in Camden, London. They are clinically led, with London Borough of Camden, England the 35 GP practices in Camden making up their membership and working alongside them to Organisation Type make decisions about how best to deliver health CCG commissioning healthcare across and care services across the borough. the region The Challenge Population Covered The Care Integrated Digital Record (CIDR) 250,000 project came about to coordinate a complex health system in Camden which was delivering Number of Clinical Users very mixed outcomes. Like many NHS 2,400 commissioners, NHS Camden CCG faced the challenge of patient information existing in a Key Benefits number of disparate systems across GP records, • Single integrated digital care record hospital records, clinical documents, community available to care givers across all GP health records, mental health records, social practices, mental health, community care records and end of life care records, with no health, two NHS acute trusts and single view available. They developed a business local authority systems including case with providers for a single integrated digital social care care record system to help care givers deliver the • Efficiencies gained in less time best outcomes for patients. spent by staff chasing information, fewer duplicated tests and reduced The Solution inpatient admissions NHS Camden CCG has made major inroads • Improved patient safety with better in achieving the National Information Board’s informed care decisions based on a 2020 directive to implement ‘real-time digital holistic view of information on a person’s health and care by patient information including 2020’.
    [Show full text]
  • Reply to Tasker, and to Lellouche and L'her
    AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 31-October-2019 as 10.1164/rccm.201910-2045LE Page 1 of 4 Reply to Tasker, and to Lellouche and L’Her Edward Palmer1,2(0000-0002-8024-4616), Daniel Martin3,4 (0000-0001-6220-8235), Mervyn Singer1,5, Steve Harris1,2,6 (0000-0002-4982-1374) 1. Bloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, University College London (UCL), London, UK 2. INFORM-lab, UK 3. Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK 4. Critical Care Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK 5. Department of Critical Care, UCL Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK Corresponding author+: Dr E Palmer, Bloomsbury Institute of Intensive Care Medicine, Cruciform Building, UCL, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. [email protected] Contributions • EP: Additional sensitivity analysis • EP, DM, MS, SH: Writing of letter Declarations The views expressed are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the NIHR, the NHS or the UK Department of Health and Social Care Running Head Hyperoxemia and outcome in critical care patients Descriptor 6.4 Epidemiology, 13.04 Oxidants/Antioxidants Copyright © 2019 by the American Thoracic Society AJRCCM Articles in Press. Published on 31-October-2019 as 10.1164/rccm.201910-2045LE Page 2 of 4 To the Editor: Professor Tasker queries whether patients undergoing brainstem death testing could bias the association between exposure to hyperoxemia and mortality in our recent study (1). In our database, these patients represent a tiny fraction of patients evaluated. For the day 1, 3, 5 and 7 cohorts, there were only 33 (0.1%), 14 (0.1%), 9 (0.1%) and 6 (0.1%) patients, respectively in whom there was semantic labelling for death confirmed using neurological criteria.
    [Show full text]