Photodynamic Therapy: Targeting Cancer Biomarkers for the Treatment of Cancers

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Photodynamic Therapy: Targeting Cancer Biomarkers for the Treatment of Cancers cancers Review Photodynamic Therapy: Targeting Cancer Biomarkers for the Treatment of Cancers Xinning Wang 1,* , Dong Luo 2 and James P. Basilion 1,2,* 1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, Wearn Building B-49, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA 2 Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, 11100 Euclid Ave, Wearn Building B-44, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (X.W.); [email protected] (J.P.B.); Tel.: +216-844-4848 (X.W.); +216-983-3246 (J.P.B.); Fax: +216-844-4987 (X.W. & J.P.B.) Simple Summary: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a minimally invasive treatment option that can kill cancerous cells by subjecting them to light irradiation at a specific wavelength. The main problem related to most photosensitizers is the lack of tumor selectivity, which leads to undesired uptake in normal tissues resulting in side effects. Passive targeting and active targeting are the two strategies to improve uptake in tumor tissues. This review focused on active targeting and summarizes recent active targeting approaches in which highly potent photosensitizers are rendered tumor-specific by means of an appended targeting moiety that interacts with a protein unique to, or at least significantly more abundant on, tumor cell surfaces compared to normal cells. Abstract: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a well-documented therapy that has emerged as an effec- tive treatment modality of cancers. PDT utilizes harmless light to activate non- or minimally toxic photosensitizers to generate cytotoxic species for malignant cell eradication. Compared with con- ventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy, PDT is appealing by virtue of the minimal invasiveness, Citation: Wang, X.; Luo, D.; Basilion, J.P. Photodynamic Therapy: its safety, as well as its selectivity, and the fact that it can induce an immune response. Although Targeting Cancer Biomarkers for the local illumination of the cancer lesions renders intrinsic selectivity of PDT, most photosensitizers Treatment of Cancers. Cancers 2021, used in PDT do not display significant tumor tissue selectivity. There is a need for targeted delivery 13, 2992. https://doi.org/ of photosensitizers. The molecular identification of cancer antigens has opened new possibilities 10.3390/cancers13122992 for the development of effective targeted therapy for cancer patients. This review provides a brief overview of recent achievements of targeted delivery of photosensitizers to cancer cells by targeting Academic Editor: Michael Höpfner well-established cancer biomarkers. Overall, targeted PDT offers enhanced intracellular accumulation of the photosensitizer, leading to improved PDT efficacy and reduced toxicity to normal tissues. Received: 19 May 2021 Accepted: 14 June 2021 Keywords: photodynamic therapy; photosensitizer; targeted therapy; antibodies; ligands Published: 15 June 2021 Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in 1. Introduction published maps and institutional affil- iations. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a novel minimally invasive treatment option that has been used to treat a wide variety of cancers and other diseases [1–4]. PDT includes a photosensitizer that is inactive in the dark. When irradiated with visible light, usually long wavelength red light, in the presence of oxygen, the photosensitizer will be activated to act as an energy transducer, transferring energy to molecular oxygen (Figure1). This Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. transfer results in the generation of a series of highly reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 1 This article is an open access article singlet oxygen ( O2)[5–7]. PDT destroys cancer tissues via three mechanisms: (1) During distributed under the terms and light irradiation, ROS species are generated, which will kill cancer cells directly; (2) PDT conditions of the Creative Commons will destroy a tumor through irreversible damage to the tumor vasculature; and (3) PDT Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// will stimulate the immune response directed against tumor cells [5–8] (Figure1). Based creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ on these mechanisms, PDT has several advantages for cancer treatment, including its 4.0/). minimal invasiveness, targeted toxicity of the defined tumor tissues using targeted visible Cancers 2021, 13, 2992. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13122992 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/cancers Cancers 2021, 13, x 2 of 20 Cancers 2021, 13, 2992 2 of 19 its minimal invasiveness, targeted toxicity of the defined tumor tissues using targeted vis- lightible irradiation,light irradiation, and the and ability the toability bypass to thebypass several the resistance several resistance mechanisms mechanisms displayed bydis- malignantplayed by cells malignant [9–11]. cells [9–11]. Tumor cell necrosis and Excited singlet state . apotosis Intersystem OH . - PS O2 1 crossing Excited H2O2 triplet state 1 O2 Inflammation Dendritic cell Absorption Fluorescence Intersystem crossing Light conversion Internal 3O Phosphorescence 2 PS0 Damage to Neutrophil Ground State neovasculature FigureFigure 1. 1.Modified Modified Jablonski Jablonski scheme scheme illustrating illustrating the the principles principles and and mechanisms mechanisms of of photodynamic photodynamic therapy. therapy. Reprinted Reprinted with with permissionpermission from from Ref. Ref. [8 [8].]. Copyright Copyright 2006 2006 Springer Springer Nature. Nature. VariousVarious photosensitizers photosensitizers have have been been reported. reported. Photofrin Photofrin (porfimer (porfimer sodium) sodium)(Figure (Figure2) 2) isis the the first first approvedapproved PDT agent agent for for the the treatment treatment of of cancer cancer and and is still is still widely widely used used to treat to treatlung, lung, esophageal, esophageal, bladder bladder cancers, cancers, and cervical and cervical cancer cancer [12–15]. [12 –The15]. limitations The limitations of Photo- of Photofrinfrin include include its lack its lackof purity, of purity, poor poor tissue tissue penetration penetration at the at theactivation activation light light (630 (630 nm) nm) and andprolonged prolonged skin skin phototoxicity phototoxicity [16]. [16 Theses]. Theses drawbacks drawbacks encouraged encouraged the thedevelopment development of sec- of second-generationond-generation PDT PDT agents, agents, including including macrocyc macrocycliclic compounds, compounds, such asas VerteporfinVerteporfin [ 17[17],], whichwhich is is a a 1:11:1 mixturemixture of regioisomers, Foscan Foscan (mTHPC) (mTHPC) [18], [18], silicon silicon phthalocyanine phthalocyanine 4 (Pc 4 (Pc4) [19], 4) [19 Tookad], Tookad [20], [20 Talaporfin], Talaporfin and and protopor protoporphyrinphyrin IX (PPIX) IX (PPIX) precursors, precursors, such such as 5-ami- as 5- aminolevulinicnolevulinic acid acid (5-ALA, (5-ALA, Levulan) Levulan) [21] [21 ](Figure (Figure 22).). ComparedCompared toto Photofrin,Photofrin, most most of of the the second-generationsecond-generation PSs PSs are are pure pure single single compounds compounds and and have have high high singlet singlet oxygen oxygen quantum quantum yieldsyields (Table (Table1). 1). Pc Pc 4 also 4 also has has a very a very high high quantum quantum yield yield for fluorescence, for fluorescence, enabling enabling it to also it to bealso utilized be utilized for theranostic for theranostic approaches, approaches, see below. see below. They are They excited are atexcited longer at wavelengths, longer wave- whichlengths, allows which deeper allows penetration deeper penetration of the light of into the the light tissue into and the cantissue be usedand can to treat be used deep- to seatedtreat deep-seated tumors, resulting tumors, in improvedresulting in treatment improved efficacy. treatment The efficacy. main drawbacks The main associated drawbacks withassociated second-generation with second-generation photosensitizers photosensi are poortizers water are solubility poor water and slow solubility body clearance and slow rate.body Although clearance 5-ALA rate. Although shows high 5-ALA tumor shows selectivity high totumor glioblastoma selectivity and to bladderglioblastoma cancers, and thebladder lack of cancers, selectivity the to lack desired of selectivity targets remains to desired a problem targets forremains most photosensitizers.a problem for most While pho- specifictosensitizers. delivery While of light specific to the delivery tumors of renderslight to the selectivity tumors renders to PDT selectivity treatment, to most PDT pho-treat- tosensitizersment, most arephotosensitizers non-selectively are distributed non-selectively in the distributed body and willin the cause body side and effects, will cause e.g., accumulationside effects, e.g., in skin, accumulation causing patients in skin, to causing shield themselvespatients to shield from brightthemselves light forfrom several bright days.light Thefor several development days. The of third-generation development of PSs third-generation aimed to improve PSs aimed the pharmacological to improve the characteristicspharmacological and characteristics tumor selectivity. and tumor PSs have selectivity. shown PSs improved have shown tumor improved accumulation tumor when incorporated into delivery systems, such as liposomes [22–25], micelles [26–28], gold accumulation when incorporated into delivery systems, such as liposomes [22–25], mi- nanoparticles [29–31], and silica-based nanoparticles [32]. Approaches of using nanopar- celles
Recommended publications
  • Paclitaxel Augments Cytotoxic Effect of Photodynamic Therapy Using Verteporfin in Gastric and Bile Duct Cancer Cells
    PAPER www.rsc.org/pps | Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences Paclitaxel augments cytotoxic effect of photodynamic therapy using verteporfin in gastric and bile duct cancer cells Seungwoo Park,†a Sung Pil Hong,†a Tae Yoon Oh,b Seungmin Bang,a Jae Bock Chunga and Si Young Song*a,b Received 11th December 2007, Accepted 25th April 2008 First published as an Advance Article on the web 15th May 2008 DOI: 10.1039/b719072g Photodynamic therapy (PDT) shows a limited antitumor effect in treating gastrointestinal tumors because of improper light penetration or insufficient photosensitizer uptake. The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxic effect of PDT combined with paclitaxel on in vitro cancer cells. In vitro photodynamic therapy was performed in gastric cancer cells (NCI-N87) and bile duct cancer cells (YGIC-6B) using verteporfin (2 ug mL−1) and a PTH light source (1 000 W, Oriel Co.) with 665–675 nm narrow band pass filter. Cytotoxicity was compared using the MTT assay between cancer cells treated with PDT alone or pretreated with paclitaxel (IC25). Apoptotic changes were evaluated using DAPI staining, DNA fragmentation analysis, Annexin V-FITC apoptosis assay, cell cycle analysis, and western blots for cytochrome c, Bax, and Bid. The PDT-induced cytotoxicity was potentiated by pretreating with low dose paclitaxel (P < 0.001). The enhanced cytotoxicity was due to an augmented apoptotic response mediated by exaggerated cytochrome c released from mitochondria, without Bax or Bid activation. These results show that paclitaxel pretreatment
    [Show full text]
  • Photodynamic Therapy Induces Autophagy-Mediated Cell Death In
    Song et al. Cell Death and Disease (2020) 11:938 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-03136-y Cell Death & Disease ARTICLE Open Access Photodynamic therapy induces autophagy- mediated cell death in human colorectal cancer cells via activation of the ROS/JNK signaling pathway Changfeng Song1,WenXu1,HongkunWu2,XiaotongWang1,QianyiGong1,ChangLiu2,JianwenLiu1 and Lin Zhou2 Abstract Evidence has shown that m-THPC and verteporfin (VP) are promising sensitizers in photodynamic therapy (PDT). In addition, autophagy can act as a tumor suppressor or a tumor promoter depending on the photosensitizer (PS) and the cancer cell type. However, the role of autophagy in m-THPC- and VP-mediated PDT in in vitro and in vivo models of human colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been reported. In this study, m-THPC-PDT or VP-PDT exhibited significant phototoxicity, inhibited proliferation, and induced the generation of large amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in CRC cells. From immunoblotting, fluorescence image analysis, and transmission electron microscopy, we found extensive autophagic activation induced by ROS in cells. In addition, m-THPC-PDT or VP-PDT treatment significantly induced apoptosis in CRC cells. Interestingly, the inhibition of m-THPC-PDT-induced autophagy by knockdown of ATG5 or ATG7 substantially inhibited the apoptosis of CRC cells. Moreover, m-THPC- PDT treatment inhibited tumorigenesis of subcutaneous HCT116 xenografts. Meanwhile, antioxidant treatment 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; markedly inhibited autophagy and apoptosis induced by PDT in CRC cells by inactivating JNK signaling. In conclusion, inhibition of autophagy can remarkably alleviate PDT-mediated anticancer efficiency in CRC cells via inactivation of the ROS/JNK signaling pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination of Near Infrared Light-Activated Photodynamic Therapy Mediated by Indocyanine Green with Etoposide to Treat Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
    cancers Article Combination of Near Infrared Light-Activated Photodynamic Therapy Mediated by Indocyanine Green with Etoposide to Treat Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Ting Luo 1, Qinrong Zhang 1,* and Qing-Bin Lu 1,2,* 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; [email protected] 2 Departments of Biology and Chemistry, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada * Correspondence: [email protected] (Q.Z.); [email protected] (Q.-B.L.); Tel.: +1-519-888-4567 (ext. 33503) (Q.-B.L.) Academic Editor: Michael R. Hamblin Received: 12 May 2017; Accepted: 1 June 2017; Published: 5 June 2017 Abstract: Indocyanine green (ICG) has been reported as a potential near-infrared (NIR) photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy (PDT) of cancer. However the application of ICG-mediated PDT is both intrinsically and physiologically limited. Here we report a combination of ICG-PDT with a chemotherapy drug etoposide (VP-16), aiming to enhance the anticancer efficacy, to circumvent limitations of PDT using ICG, and to reduce side effects of VP-16. We found in controlled in vitro cell-based assays that this combination is effective in killing non-small-cell lung cancer cells (NSCLC, A549 cell line). We also found that the combination of ICG-PDT and VP-16 exhibits strong synergy in killing non-small-cell lung cancer cells partially through inducing more DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), while it has a much weaker synergy in killing human normal cells (GM05757). Furthermore, by studying the treatment sequence dependence and the cytotoxicity of laser-irradiated mixtures of ICG and VP-16, we found that the observed synergy involves direct/indirect reactions between ICG and VP-16.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeting Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Signaling Pathway For
    Published OnlineFirst August 23, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0326 Small Molecule Therapeutics Molecular Cancer Therapeutics Targeting Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase Signaling Pathway for Therapeutic Enhancement of Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy Daniel Kraus1, Pratheeba Palasuberniam1, and Bin Chen1,2 Abstract Vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (PDT) selectively the strongest synergism, followed in order by combinations disrupts vascular function by inducing oxidative damages to with pan-PI3K inhibitor BKM120 and p110a isoform-selective the vasculature, particularly endothelial cells. Although effec- inhibitor BYL719. Combination treatments of PDT and tive tumor eradication and excellent safety profile are well BEZ235 exhibited a cooperative inhibition of antiapoptotic demonstrated in both preclinical and clinical studies, incom- Bcl-2 family protein Mcl-1 and induced more cell apoptosis plete vascular shutdown and angiogenesis are known to cause than each treatment alone. In addition to increasing treatment tumor recurrence after vascular-targeted PDT. We have explored lethality, BEZ235 combined with PDT effectively inhibited therapeutic enhancement of vascular-targeted PDT with PI3K PI3K pathway activation and consequent endothelial cell pro- signaling pathway inhibitors because the activation of PI3K liferation after PDT alone, leading to a sustained growth inhi- pathway was involved in promoting endothelial cell survival bition. In the PC-3 prostate tumor model, combination treat- and proliferation after PDT. Here, three clinically relevant ments improved treatment outcomes by turning a temporary small-molecule inhibitors (BYL719, BKM120, and BEZ235) of tumor regrowth delay induced by PDT alone to a more long- the PI3K pathway were evaluated in combination with verte- lasting treatment response. Our study strongly supports the porfin-PDT.
    [Show full text]
  • Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses and Other Skin Lesions
    Photodynamic Therapy for the Treatment of Actinic Keratoses and Other Skin Lesions Policy Number: Current Effective Date: MM.02.016 March 22, 2019 Lines of Business: Original Effective Date: HMO; PPO; QUEST Integration April 01, 2008 Place of Service: Precertification: Office Not Required I. Description Photodynamic therapy (PDT) refers to light activation of a photosensitizer to generate highly reactive intermediaries, which ultimately cause tissue injury and necrosis. Photosensitizing agents are being proposed for use with dermatologic conditions such as actinic keratoses and nonmelanoma skin cancers.For individuals who have nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratoses on the face or scalp who receive PDT, the evidence includes randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The relevant outcomes are symptoms, change in disease status, quality of life, and treatment-related morbidity. Evidence from multiple RCTs has found that PDT improves the net health outcome in patients with nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratoses on the face or scalp compared with placebo or other active interventions. The evidence is sufficient to determine that the technology results in a meaningful improvement in the net health outcome. For individuals who have low-risk basal cell carcinoma who receive PDT, the evidence includes RCTs and systematic reviews of RCTs. The relevant outcomes are symptoms, change in disease status, quality of life, and treatment-related morbidity. Systematic reviews of RCTs have found that PDT may not be as effective as surgery for superficial and nodular basal cell carcinoma. In the small number of trials available, PDT was more effective than placebo. The available evidence from RCTs has suggested that PDT has better cosmetic outcomes than surgery.
    [Show full text]
  • Mtor Signaling in Metabolism and Cancer
    cells Editorial mTOR Signaling in Metabolism and Cancer Shile Huang 1,2 1 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71130-3932, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-318-675-7759 2 Feist-Weiller Cancer Center, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, 1501 Kings Highway, Shreveport, LA 71130-3932, USA Received: 10 October 2020; Accepted: 13 October 2020; Published: 13 October 2020 Abstract: The mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a serine/threonine kinase, is a central regulator for human physiological activity. Deregulated mTOR signaling is implicated in a variety of disorders, such as cancer, obesity, diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases. The papers published in this special issue summarize the current understanding of the mTOR pathway and its role in the regulation of tissue regeneration, regulatory T cell differentiation and function, and different types of cancer including hematologic malignancies, skin, prostate, breast, and head and neck cancer. The findings highlight that targeting the mTOR pathway is a promising strategy to fight against certain human diseases. Keywords: mTOR; PI3K; Akt; tissue regeneration; regulatory T cells; tumor; photodynamic therapy The mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), a serine/threonine kinase, integrates environmental cues such as hormones, growth factors, nutrients, oxygen, and energy, regulating cell growth, proliferation, survival, motility and differentiation as well as metabolism (reviewed in [1,2]). Evidence has demonstrated that deregulated mTOR signaling is implicated in a variety of disorders, such as cancer, obesity, diabetes, and neurodegenerative diseases (reviewed in [1,2]). Current knowledge indicates that mTOR functions at least as two distinct complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2) in mammalian cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluorouracil Enhances Photodynamic Therapy of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Via a P53 - Independent Mechanism That Increases Protoporphyrin IX Levels and Tumor Cell Death
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on March 23, 2017; DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-16-0608 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Fluorouracil enhances photodynamic therapy of squamous cell carcinoma via a p53 - independent mechanism that increases protoporphyrin IX levels and tumor cell death Sanjay Anand 1,2,*, Kishore R. Rollakanti 1, Nikoleta Brankov 1, Douglas E. Brash 3, Tayyaba Hasan4, and Edward V. Maytin1,2,4,* 1 Departments of Biomedical Engineering and 2 Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. 3 Departments of Therapeutic Radiology and Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. 4 Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA. * Corresponding authors. Running title: Fluorouracil combined with PDT for skin cancer Key words: Photodynamic therapy, Protoporphyrin IX, Aminolevulinic acid, Squamous cell carcinoma, p53. Abbreviations: 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; ALA, 5-aminolevulinic acid/δ-aminolevulinic acid; ALAD, δ- aminolevulinic acid dehydratase; ALAS, δ-aminolevulinic acid synthase; AK, actinic keratosis; Caspase, cysteine-aspartic proteases; C/EBP, CCAAT enhancer binding protein, cPDT, combination- photodynamic therapy; CPO, coproporphyrinogen oxidase; DAPI, 4’, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Ecad, epithelial cadherin; FC, ferrochelatase; FdUMP, 5-fluoro-2’-deoxyuridine-5’-monophosphate; FdUTP, 5-fluoro-2’-deoxyuridine-5’-triphosphate; FUTP, fluoridine-5’-triphophate; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; H&E,
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Cisplatin on Photosensitizer-Mediated
    Original Article Obstet Gynecol Sci 2019;62(2):112-119 https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2019.62.2.112 pISSN 2287-8572 · eISSN 2287-8580 Effects of cisplatin on photosensitizer-mediated photodynamic therapy in breast tumor-bearing nude mice Tae-Gyu Ahn, Ji Min Jung, Eun-Jeong Lee, Ji Hyun Choi Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea Objective This study aimed to evaluate the potential effects of cisplatin on photodynamic therapy (PDT) in breast cancer using a breast tumor-bearing mouse model. Methods In this study, breast tumor (experimental mammary tumour-6 cell)-bearing nude mice were used as experimental animals. Photolon® (photosensitizer, 2.5 mg/kg body weight [BW]) was injected intraperitoneally; after 2 hours, the tumors were irradiated (660 nm, 80 J/cm2) using a diode laser tool. Cisplatin (3 mg/kg BW) was injected intraperitoneally 1 hour before the Photolon® injection. Results Tumor volume increased over time in the control group and was not different from that in the cisplatin group. In the PDT group, the tumor volume increased on day 3, but not on day 7. In the cisplatin+PDT group, tumor volume increased on day 3 but decreased on day 7. There was no significant difference in the levels of thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) in tumor tissues between the control and cisplatin groups. The levels of TBARS in the cisplatin+PDT group were higher (47%) than those in the PDT group. Analysis of tumor tissue transcriptomes showed that the expression of genes related to the inflammatory response including CL and XCL genes increased, while that of Fn1 decreased in the cisplatin+PDT group compared with the PDT group.
    [Show full text]
  • Autophagy Regulation and Photodynamic Therapy: Insights to Improve Outcomes of Cancer Treatment
    REVIEW published: 20 January 2021 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.610472 Autophagy Regulation and Photodynamic Therapy: Insights to Improve Outcomes of Cancer Treatment Waleska K. Martins 1*, Renata Belotto 2, Maryana N. Silva 1, Daniel Grasso 3, Maynne D. Suriani 4, Tayna´ S. Lavor 4, Rosangela Itri 5, Mauricio S. Baptista 6 and Tayana M. Tsubone 4* 1 Laboratory of Cell and Membrane, Anhanguera University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 2 Perola Byington Hospital Edited by: Gynecology - Lasertherapy Clinical Research Department, São Paulo, Brazil, 3 CONICET, Instituto de Estudios de la Boris Zhivotovsky, Inmunidad Humoral (IDEHU), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 4 Institute of Chemistry, Federal Karolinska Institutet (KI), Sweden University of Uberlaˆ ndia, Uberlaˆ ndia, Brazil, 5 Institute of Physics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 6 Institute of Reviewed by: Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil Dmitri V. Krysko, Ghent University, Belgium Cancer is considered an age-related disease that, over the next 10 years, will become the Luciana Dini, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy most prevalent health problem worldwide. Although cancer therapy has remarkably *Correspondence: improved in the last few decades, novel treatment concepts are needed to defeat this Waleska K. Martins disease. Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) signalize a pathway to treat and manage several [email protected] Tayana M. Tsubone types of cancer. Over the past three decades, new light sources and photosensitizers (PS) [email protected] have been developed to be applied in PDT. Nevertheless, there is a lack of knowledge to explain the main biochemical routes needed to trigger regulated cell death mechanisms, Specialty section: affecting, considerably, the scope of the PDT.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Photodynamic Therapy on Multidrug Resistant Breast Cancer Eric Chekwube Aniogo, Blassan Plackal Adimuriyil George and Heidi Abrahamse*
    Aniogo et al. Cancer Cell Int (2019) 19:91 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0815-0 Cancer Cell International REVIEW Open Access The role of photodynamic therapy on multidrug resistant breast cancer Eric Chekwube Aniogo, Blassan Plackal Adimuriyil George and Heidi Abrahamse* Abstract Breast cancer heterogeneity allows cells with diferent phenotypes to co-exist, contributing to treatment failure and development of drug resistance. In addition, abnormal signal transduction and dysfunctional DNA repair genes are common features with breast cancer resistance. Chemo-resistance of breast cancer associated with multidrug resist- ance events utilizes ATP-binding cassette (ABC) efux transporters to decrease drug intracellular concentration. Pho- todynamic therapy (PDT) is the treatment that involves a combination of a photosensitizer (PS), light and molecular oxygen to induce cell death. This treatment modality has been considered as a possible approach in combatting mul- tidrug resistance phenomenon although its therapeutic potential towards chemo-resistance is still unclear. Attempts to minimize the impact of efux transporters on drug resistance suggested concurrent use of chemotherapy agents, nanotechnology, endolysosomal release of drug by photochemical internalization and the use of structurally related compound inhibitors to block the transport function of the multidrug resistant transporters. In this review, we briefy summarize the role of membrane ABC efux transporters in therapeutic outcomes and highlight research fndings related to PDT and its applications on breast cancer with multidrug resistance phenotype. With the development of an ideal PS for photodynamic cancer treatment, it is possible that light activation may be used not only to sensitize the tumour but also to enable release of PS into the cytosol and as such bypass efux membrane proteins and inhibit escape pathways that may lead to resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Photodynamic Therapy Treatment
    Photodynamic Therapy Treatment Hello. My name is Doctor Nicole Annest. I am here to talk to you today about your Photodynamic Therapy or PDT light treatment. PDT is used to treat pre-cancerous spots known to dermatologists as actinic keratosis. We treat these areas so they will not progress to become invasive skin cancers. PDT is also used to treat very thin or superficial skin cancers. Before your treatment begins we will ask you to sign a consent form and ask you about some medications you may be taking as well as some details of your health history. PDT can have similar effects to other treatments which you may have used in the past. The total time required for your PDT light treatment today will be a few hours. During the treatment, a solution called 5-aminolevulinic acid or Levulan will be placed on your skin. This solution is absorbed by the sun damaged areas of your skin. Then, a bright light is used to activate this solution, thereby killing the sun damaged cells. After your skin heals, the sun damaged cells are replaced with new, healthy skin cells. There are a few important things to be aware of when undergoing PDT light treatment. First, you must strictly avoid any sun exposure for 48 hours after treatment. Second, if your face is being treated and you have a history of cold sores, you must take anti-viral medication to prevent a flare of the virus that causes cold sores. You should have been asked about a history of cold sores at the time of your appointment scheduling if your face is being treated.
    [Show full text]
  • Photodynamic Therapy Combined to Cisplatin Potentiates Cell Death
    de Freitas et al. BMC Cancer (2017) 17:123 DOI 10.1186/s12885-017-3075-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Photodynamic therapy combined to cisplatin potentiates cell death responses of cervical cancer cells Laura Marise de Freitas1, Rodolfo Bortolozo Serafim2, Juliana Ferreira de Sousa2, Thaís Fernanda Moreira1, Cláudia Tavares dos Santos1, Amanda Martins Baviera1, Valeria Valente1,2, Christiane Pienna Soares1 and Carla Raquel Fontana1* Abstract Background: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has proven to be a promising alternative to current cancer treatments, especially if combined with conventional approaches. The technique is based on the administration of a non-toxic photosensitizing agent to the patient with subsequent localized exposure to a light source of a specific wavelength, resulting in a cytotoxic response to oxidative damage. The present study intended to evaluate in vitro the type of induced death and the genotoxic and mutagenic effects of PDT alone and associated with cisplatin. Methods: We used the cell lines SiHa (ATCC® HTB35™), C-33 A (ATCC® HTB31™) and HaCaT cells, all available at Dr. Christiane Soares’ Lab. Photosensitizers were Photogem (PGPDT) and methylene blue (MBPDT), alone or combined with cisplatin. Cell death was accessed through Hoechst and Propidium iodide staining and caspase-3 activity. Genotoxicity and mutagenicity were accessed via flow cytometry with anti-gama-H2AX and micronuclei assay, respectively. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc test. Results: Both MBPDT and PGPDT induced caspase-independent death, but MBPDT induced the morphology of typical necrosis, while PGPDT induced morphological alterations most similar to apoptosis. Cisplatin predominantly induced apoptosis, and the combined therapy induced variable rates of apoptosis- or necrosis-like phenotypes according to the cell line, but the percentage of dead cells was always higher than with monotherapies.
    [Show full text]