DOCSLIB.ORG

Agenda Item 6A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agenda Item 6A Agenda Item 6a Case Number 20/01437/RG3 (Formerly PP-08691398) Application Type Application Submitted by the Council Proposal Retention and refurbishment of existing buildings, demolition of associated structures and erection of new buildings to form a mixed use development comprising a communal hall with associated retail space, cafe, bar (Use Classes A1/A2/A3/A4/A5) flexible business, events and studio space (Use Classes B1/D1/D2) and associated works Location Land Bound By Cambridge Street, Wellington Street and Backfields Sheffield S1 4HP Date Received 06/05/2020 Team City Centre and East Applicant/Agent Miss Lauren Hawksworth Recommendation Grant Conditionally Time limit for Commencement of Development 1. The development shall be begun not later than the expiration of three years from the date of this decision. Reason: In order to comply with the requirements of the Town and Country Planning Act. Approved/Refused Plan(s) 2. The development must be carried out in complete accordance with the following approved documents: HOH-FCBS-Z3-XX-DR-A-0001 P1 - H3 Existing Location Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-XX-DR-A-0010 P1 - H3 Site Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-B1-DR-A-0038 P1 - Existing Basement Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-LG-DR-A-0039 P1 - Existing Lower Ground Floor Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-UG-DR-A-0040 P1 - Existing Upper Ground Floor Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-01-DR-A-0041 P1 - Existing First Floor Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-02-DR-A-0042 P1 - Existing Second Floor Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-RF-DR-A-0043 P1 - Existing Roof Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0080 P1 - Existing Sections HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0090 P1 - Existing West Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0091 P1 - Existing Bethel Walk Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0092 P1 - Existing East Elevations Page 11 HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0093 P1 - Existing South Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-B1-DR-A-0098 P1 - Proposed Basement Level Demolition Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-LG-DR-A-0099 P2 - Proposed Lower Ground Floor Demolition Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-UG-DR-A-0100 P2 - Proposed Upper Ground Floor Demolition Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-01-DR-A-0101 P1 - Proposed First Floor Demolition Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-02-DR-A-0102 P2 - Proposed Second Floor Demolition Plans HOH-FCBS-Z3-RF-DR-A-0103 P2 - Proposed Roof level Demolition Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-00-DR-A-0104 P2 - Proposed Ground Floor Bethel Sunday School Demolition Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-01-DR-A-0105 P2 - Proposed First Floor Bethel Sunday School Demolition Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-02-DR-A-0106 P1 - Proposed Second Floor Level Bethel Sunday School Demolition Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-RF-DR-A-0107 P2 - Proposed Roof Level Bethel Sunday School Demolition Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0161 P1 - Demolition West Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0162 P2 - Demolition Bethel Walk Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0163 P1 - Demolition East Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0164 P1 - Demolition South Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-B1-DR-A-0198 P1 - H3 Proposed Basement Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-LG-DR-A-0199 P2 - H3 Proposed Lower Ground Floor Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-UG-DR-A-0200 P2 - H3 Proposed Upper Ground Floor Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-01-DR-A-0201 P2 - H3 Proposed First Floor Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-02-DR-A-0202 P2 - H3 Proposed Second Floor Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-03-DR-A-0203 P1 - H3 Proposed Third Floor Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-RF-DR-A-0204 P1 - H3 Proposed Roof Plan HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0701 P2 - H3 GA-Section AA HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0702 P1 - H3 GA-Section BB HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0703 P1 - H3 GA-Section CC HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0704 P2 - H3 GA-Section DD HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0705 P1 - H3 GA-Section EE HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0706 P1 - H3 GA-Section FF HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0707 P1 - H3 GA-Section GG HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0752 P2 - H3 Site Elevations HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0801 P2 - H3 Proposed West Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0802 P1 - H3 Proposed North Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0803 P1 - H3 Proposed East Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0804 P1 - H3 Proposed South Elevation HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0851 P1 - Bay Study - West Elevation - Arrival Building HOH-FCBS-Z3-ZZ-DR-A-0852 P2 - Bay Study - West Elevation - Bethel Chapel Reason: In order to define the permission. Pre-Commencement Condition(s) 3. Prior to the commencement of development (excluding demolition) a supplementary intrusive site investigation and risk assessment shall be carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Preliminary Geoenvironmental Risk Assessment (ref: HOHARUP-Z3-XX-RP-CG-0002, dated 24/4/20) and be the subject of a Phase II Intrusive Site Investigation Report which shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The Report shall be prepared in accordance with Contaminated Land Report CLR 11 (Environment Agency 2004). Reason: In order to ensure that any contamination of the land is properly dealt with. Page 12 4. Any remediation works recommended in the Phase II Intrusive Site Investigation Report shall be the subject of a Remediation Strategy Report which shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to construction works commencing. The Report shall be prepared in accordance with Contaminated Land Report CLR11 (Environment Agency 2004) and Local Planning Authority policies relating to validation of capping measures and validation of gas protection measures. Reason: In order to ensure that any contamination of the land is properly dealt with and the site is safe for the development to proceed, it is essential that this condition is complied with before the development is commenced. 5. Prior to the commencement of development (excluding demolition) the improvements (which expression shall include traffic control, pedestrian and cycle safety measures) to the highways listed below shall have either: a) been carried out; or b) details have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority of arrangements which will have been entered into which will secure that such improvement works will be carried out before the development is brought into use. Highway Improvement Works: (i) Backfields (partial closure to motor vehicles/ diversion and associated public realm works) (ii) Bethel Walk (partial closure) (iii) Cambridge Street between Cross Burgess Street and Division Street - Displacement of on-street parking, replacement of disabled parking, provision of service laybys and public realm works. - Promotion of a Traffic Regulation Order in relation to servicing/loading (waiting and loading restrictions) and parking restrictions, and the prohibition of motorised traffic in the vicinity of the development site, all subject to usual procedures, including provision of associated signing and lining (iv) Provision for the movement of cyclists, pedestrians and motorised traffic along Backfields, (including the provision of direction signing), with the aim of providing interventions that deliver safe cycle routes in the vicinity of the development. (v) Any accommodation works to traffic signs, road markings, repositioning street lighting columns, highway drainage and general street furniture deemed necessary as a consequence of the development. (vi) All materials within public realm works and adopted highway in the vicinity of the development are to be in accordance with the Sheffield Urban Design Compendium. Reason: To enable the above-mentioned highways to accommodate the increase in traffic, which in the opinion of the Local Planning Authority, will be generated by the development, and in the interests of protecting free and safe flow of traffic on the public highway it is essential that this condition is complied with before any works on site commence. Page 13 6. Prior to the improvement works indicated in the preceding condition being carried out, full details of these improvement works shall have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of highway safety and the amenities of the locality. 7. No development, including any demolition of foundations and groundworks, shall take place until the applicant, or their agent or successor in title, has submitted a Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) that sets out a strategy for below-ground archaeological investigation and this has been approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The WSI shall include: - The programme and method of site investigation and recording. - The requirement to seek preservation in situ of identified features of importance. - The programme for post-investigation assessment. - The provision to be made for analysis and reporting. - The provision to be made for publication and dissemination of the results. - The provision to be made for deposition of the archive created. - Nomination of a competent person/persons or organisation to undertake the works. - The timetable for completion of all site investigation and post-investigation works. Thereafter the development shall only take place in accordance with the approved below-ground archaeological investigation WSI and the development shall not be brought into use until the Local Planning Authority has confirmed in writing that the requirements of the WSI have been fulfilled or alternative timescales agreed. Reason: To ensure that any archaeological remains present, whether buried or part of a standing building, are investigated and a proper understanding of their nature, date, extent and significance gained, before those remains are damaged or destroyed and that knowledge gained is then disseminated. It is essential that this condition is complied with before any other works on site commence given that damage to archaeological remains is irreversible.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Page 13 View That As Much of the Frontage of Cambridge Street Should Be Retained in Order to Maintain the Context Within Which Leah’S Yard Is Located
    Sheffield Conservation Advisory Group SHEFFIELD RETAIL QUARTER Observations on the outline planning application 1. SCAG considered the proposals for the Sheffield Retail Quarter at a special meeting on 29 September 2015. 2. The question that the Group has considered is whether the scheme would preserve and enhance the character and appearance of the City Centre Conservation Area, in which much of the scheme lies, and its impact on listed buildings in, and immediately adjacent to, the area, one of which is Grade I (Town Hall). 3. The Group considers that the proposals are an improvement on the previous schemes produced by Hammersons, although has reservations about aspects of the scheme as it currently appears. These are set out below. The Group is also conscious that the success of the scheme will depend in large measure on the detailed realisation of the individual blocks. But they take the view that it is essential that the overall form and massing of the development is subject to critical analysis at this stage, given that an outline permission will constrain the way in which the scheme can be integrated into the fabric of the city. 4. The Group’s major concern is about the views of the development from key locations within the city centre and the relationship of new buildings to their immediate surroundings. The scheme proposals make much play of the view along Fargate and the proposed New Fargate from Marks & Spencers store to the new anchor department store to the north of the present Charter Square. The Group expressed concern over the views from the Peace Gardens and the Town Hall steps and the way in which the proposed height of buildings would dominate the frontages in Pinstone Street, including Town Hall Chambers.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Modelling and Cycling Modal Share
    1 RE: Planning application 15/02917/OUT, New Retail Quarter Wellington Street Sheffield S1 4HD Written by Matt Turner on behalf of CycleSheffield, 25a Middlewood Road, S6 4GW For over 20 years Cycle Sheffield has campaigned to create a cycle-friendly Sheffield, where everyone has the choice to make daily journeys by bike. Our vision is a cycle friendly and people friendly city where people of all ages and abilities have the freedom to ride a bike – not only the young, quick, fit and brave. We are a constituted organisation with over 550 paying members. CycleSheffield took part in the Retail Quarter consultation by organising the ‘CycleSheffield Postcards’ which are referenced in the Statement of Community Involvement. Over 300 people responded to the public consultation calling for the development to be cycle-friendly: comments regarding cycle provision and pedestrian and cycle safety ranked in first and second place in the issues raised. CycleSheffield has met with Sheffield City Council, Arup and Counter Context during September to discuss and fully understand the transport proposals within the plan. We also organised a public event on 8th September where we walked around the site, explained the plans to members of the public and gathered feedback. This work has influenced our response to the planning application. Sheffield’s Vision for Excellent Transport aims for 10% of all journeys in Sheffield by bike by 2025 (just 10 years away) and 25% of all journeys by 2050. The South Yorkshire Cycling Actions plan has similar aims, with a target of 10% of all journeys in South Yorkshire to be made by bike by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield Retail Quarter – Heart of the City Phase 2 ______
    Agenda Item 7 Report to Economic and Environmental Wellbeing Scrutiny and Policy Development Committee 30 November 2017 Report of: Nalin Seneviratne, Director – City Centre Development ______________________________________________________________ Subject: Sheffield Retail Quarter – Heart of the City Phase 2 ______________________________________________________________ Author of Report: Nalin Seneviratne, Director – City Centre Development [email protected] ______________________________________________________________ Summary: The Sheffield Retail Quarter is now on site and being delivered at pace after many years of delay. The first phase comprises a landmark office building including new retail space. The remainder of the scheme follows closely behind and is being shaped through a revision to the master plan presented in the summer of 2015 and taken to the Planning Committee in 2016. The project is a major city centre redevelopment and at this stage, the City Council is the developer having acquired the land ownership of the site. The report provides a status update and describes the outline timescale for the remaining delivery of the scheme. The Committee are invited to review matters and provide views, comments and challenge given the nature of this project. This scheme provides the opportunity for a transformational retail based mixed- use development that gives residents, workers and visitors a quality experience that is distinctively of Sheffield and is the hub linking the existing retail, cultural, leisure and employment offers. The first phase of this scheme is being delivered with 56,000 sq. of new retail and leisure space together with 140,000 sq.ft. of new offices with a major pre-let to HSBC. This phase is focused around high quality public realm linking the development to the redevelopment of The Moor, which is being undertaken by Aberdeen Standard Life Investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Protocol for Cabinet Reports
    Agenda Item 11 Author/Lead Officer of Report: David Ambrose Tel: 0114 27 35539 Report of: Executive Director, Place and Executive Director of Resources Report to: Cabinet Date of Decision: 15th July 2020 Subject: Heart of the City II: Approval and endorsement for the Council’s updated delivery strategy. Is this a Key Decision? If Yes, reason Key Decision: - Yes x No - Expenditure and/or savings over £500,000 x - Affects 2 or more Wards Which Cabinet Member Portfolio does this relate to? Cabinet Member for Business & Investment and Cabinet Member for Finance Which Scrutiny and Policy Development Committee does this relate to? Economic and Environmental Wellbeing. Has an Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) been undertaken? Yes X No If YES, what EIA reference number has it been given? 926 Does the report contain confidential or exempt information? Yes x No Part 1 – OPEN, with CLOSED Part 2 Part 2 of this report is not for publication by virtue of Regulation 20(2) Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information) (England) Regulations 2012 because, in the opinion of the proper officer, it contains exempt information under Paragraph 3 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government Act 1972 (as amended) and the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information. Form 2 – Executive Report Page 45 July 2016 Purpose of Report: This report seeks to 1) Provide an update to the Heart of the City II development two years following the major decision that this Council took to invest in and progress the major re-shaping of Sheffield City Centre following past difficulties and seeks approval/endorsement for the Councils updated delivery strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield and Rotherham Clean Air Zone Feasibility Study Outline Business Case
    SHEFFIELD AND ROTHERHAM CLEAN AIR ZONE FEASIBILITY STUDY OUTLINE BUSINESS CASE 24 December 2018 DOCUMENT CONTROL APPROVAL Version Name Organisation Date Changes 1 Authors Laurie Brennan SCC December David Connolly SYSTRA 2018 Amanda Cosgrove SCC Julie Kent RMBC Julie Meese SCC Matt Reynolds RMBC Ogo Osammor SCC Chris Robinson SYSTRA Jane Wilby SCC Checked David Connolly SYSTRA, Director by 21/12/18 Approved Tom Finnegan-Smith SCC Head of 21/12/2018 by / Tom Smith Strategic Transport and Infrastructure / RMBC Assistant Director, Community Safety and Street Scene 2 Author Checked by Approved by TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 1.1 CONTEXT 6 1.2 THE 5 CASE MODEL 6 1.3 OUR PREFERRED OPTION – CATEGORY C CAZ WITH ADDITIONAL MEASURES (‘+’) 7 1.4 IMPROVING THE VEHICLES ON OUR ROADS – SUPPORTING DRIVERS AND BUSINESSES 7 1.5 IMPACT OF OUR PREFERRED OPTION ON AIR QUALITY 9 1.6 CONCLUSIONS 10 2. STRATEGIC CASE 11 2.1 NATIONAL CONTEXT 11 2.2 LOCAL TRAFFIC, EMISSIONS AND AIR QUALITY MODELLING 12 2.3 AIR QUALITY IN SHEFFIELD 13 2.4 AIR QUALITY IN ROTHERHAM 15 2.5 HEALTH IMPACTS 19 2.6 RELEVANT LOCAL AUTHORITY POLICIES AND STRATEGIES 21 2.7 SPENDING OBJECTIVES 25 2.8 BENEFITS, RISKS, CONSTRAINTS AND DEPENDENCIES 26 2.9 OTHER STRATEGIC ISSUES 28 3. ECONOMIC CASE 29 3.1 INTRODUCTION 29 3.2 OVERVIEW OF THE OPTIONS BEING APPRAISED 29 3.3 THE LEVEL OF THE CAZ CHARGES 31 3.4 WHAT WOULD THE MONEY FROM CHARGES BE USED FOR 32 3.5 TIME-SCALES AND TIME-RELATED PROFILES 33 3.6 MONETISING THE EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS 33 3.7 SCHEME COSTS 36 3.8 CHARGES PAID/REVENUE GENERATED 38 3.9 BENEFIT TO COST RATIOS 39 3.10 CONCLUSIONS FROM THE ECONOMIC CASE 40 4.
    [Show full text]
  • St Paul's Chambers, Sheffield
    St Paul’s Chambers, Sheffield PRIME CITY CENTRE MIXED USE INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR SALE Investment Summary • St Paul’s Chambers is very well situated in the prime location of the city, forming part of the ‘Heart of the City’. • Occupiers at St Paul’s include; DLA Piper, Barclays Corporate Banking, PwC and the Government Department for Business Innovation & Skills. The leisure occupiers include; Café Rouge, Caffè Nero, Piccolino, Pizza Express, Genting Casino, Cosmo and Smoke BBQ. • The property is a high quality, leisure and retail development, arranged over ground floor and basement, which was fully redeveloped in early 2000’s, comprising 4 self contained units measuring 9,132 sq ft, also benefiting from the ground rent income from the residential apartments above. • The subject interest is held by way of a long leasehold interest expiring 2251 at a peppercorn rent to Sheffield City Council. • A total income of £199,600 per annum and a Weighted Average Unexpired Lease Term (WAULT) of 13.1 years. • The income is underpinned by Mitchells and Butlers Retail (No 2) Limited, with 87% of the WAULT and 57% of the passing rental. • Offers are sought above £3,000,000 (three million pounds), subject to contract and exclusive of VAT. • A purchase at this level represents a Net Initial Yield of 6.25%, after allowing for purchaser’s costs of 6.45%. Sheffield is England’s fourth largest city and the commercial, administrative Sheffield Mainline Station provides direct services to the following UK Location and retail centre of South Yorkshire, with an urban area population of cities with approximate fastest journey times as below: approximately 640,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield & Rotherham Joint Retail & Leisure Study
    * First Floor, City Point 29 King Street Leeds LS1 2HL T: +44 (0)8449 02 03 04 F: +44 (0)113 280 8080 Sheffield & Rotherham Joint Retail & Leisure Study Sheffield City Council & Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council February 2017 gva.co.uk Sheffield City Council & Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Contents Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Planning Policy and Strategy Context ................................................................................................ 4 3. Retail and Leisure Trends .................................................................................................................... 25 4. Sub-regional hierarchy ........................................................................................................................ 35 5. The Sheffield Retail Hierarchy and Health Check Assessments ..................................................... 40 6. The Rotherham Retail Hierarchy and Town Centre Health Checks .............................................. 94 7. The Basis for the Need Assessment for Retail and Leisure Floorspace ........................................ 128 8. Assessment of Need for Retail and Leisure Floorspace in Sheffield ............................................ 139 9. Assessment of need for retail and leisure floorspace in Rotherham ........................................... 160 10. Policy Recommendations ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Page 81 Page Castlegate, Currently Under Performs in Terms of New Investment, Jobs and the Numbers of Students Given Its Potential
    Capital Team | Commercial Business Development Summary Appendix 1 CPG: 21st November 2018 Scheme name & summary description Value £’000 A Economic Growth New additions None Variations and reasons for change Knowledge Gateway Scheme description +154 The strategic rationale for the Knowledge Gateway is to unlock and connect key development sites in order to generate additional economic growth. The corridor which links the Cultural Industries Quarter, Hallam’s Central Campus, the Digital Campus and the emerging innovation zone of Page 81 Castlegate, currently under performs in terms of new investment, jobs and the numbers of students given its potential. Working with the support and funding from Sheffield Hallam University and the other key partners this project aims to: - Encourage new investments and jobs. This project will act as a catalyst for new regeneration opportunities in the Creative and Digital Industries sector, a key growth sector as identified in the Strategic Economic Plan, especially around Paternoster Row, Brown St and Sidney St. - Address strategic and site specific issues such as improved walking and cycling routes, disabled access issues at Site Gallery; interface between The Showroom and Paternoster Row; and the domination of buses and taxis at Fitzalan Square, which currently undermine inward investment. - Make the area more attractive, feel and be safer, thereby increasing footfall and ultimately bringing new investment, jobs, footfall, student numbers and economic growth - Create a series of high quality useable public
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 6
    Agenda Item 6 SHEFFIELD CONSERVATION ADVISORY GROUP Meeting held 20 th September , 2016 PRESENT: Name Organisation Dr. Philip Booth (Chair) Co-opted Member Mr. Tim Hale Sheffield Chamber of Mr. Patrick Burns Commerce Mr. Rod Flint Co-opted Member Mr. Simon Geddye Georgian Group Mr. Howard Greaves Civic Trust Hallamshire Historic Buildings Mr. Graham Hague Society Victorian Society/South Dr. Roger Harper Yorkshire Industrial History Mr. Bob Hawkins Society Ancient Monuments Society Dr. Jo Lintonbon Council for the Protection of Mr. Bob Marshall Rural England Dr. Jan Woudstra University of Sheffield Royal Town Planning Institute Landscape Institute 1. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Prof. Clyde Binfield (Twentieth Century Society), Mr. Rob Darrington (Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors), Mr. Andrew Shepherd (Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings) and Louise White (Civic Trust). 2. MINUTES The minutes of the meeting held on 21st June, 2016, were approved as a correct record, subject to the substitution, in the apologies for absence of the words “Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings” for the words ” Society for the Protection of Rural England”. Arising therefrom, the Group (a) noted that:- (i) the Chair (Dr. Booth) had not had further contact with the City Council about the possible appointment of Dr. Woudstra be appointed as a member of the Independent Tree Panel, following a letter from the Head of Planning in June last. He would pursue the matter further; (ii) a local heritage action zone application, in respect of Castlegate, had been submitted to Historic England. The scheme had a wider brief than previous schemes, being area based rather than building specific and one project per territory, of which there four, would be selected; (iii) (A) the proposed scheme for the provision of student flats on the site of Stokes Tiles was not going ahead, (B) action had been started regarding the Page 11 Meeting of the Sheffield Conservation Advisory Group 20.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 High Street, City Centre Sheffields1
    50 High Street, City Centre Sheffield S1 1QH PROPOSED VIEW FROM CASTLE SQUARE - CGI FOR INDICATIVE PURPOSES ONLY 1 50 High Street, City Centre, Sheffield S1 1QH SUBSTANTIAL 99,782 SQ FT (9,270 SQ M) CITY CENTRE DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY The Moor Sheffield Amphitheatre Sheffield Station Sheffield Retail Quarter Peace Gardens Primark Bus Station John Lewis Crucible Theatre Pinstone Street Orchard Square Shopping Centre Fargate 2 50 High Street, City Centre, Sheffield S1 1QH Executive Summary · The City of Sheffield is the principle commercial centre in South Yorkshire and lies approximately 35 miles (56 km) south west of Leeds and 39 miles (62.7 km) east of Manchester. · Located opposite the main Sheffield Hallam Campus in the heart of Sheffield city centre. The property is situated in a prominent position at the junction of the High Street and Arundel Gate. · The subject property benefits from a GIA of 99,782 sq ft (9,270 sq m) of existing accommodation at first to fourth floors. · Existing planning permission approved for the development of 121,796 sqft (11,315 sqm) GIA of student accommodation over basement, lower ground, ground and 6 upper floors. · Consent granted for 330 new student bed spaces (38 cluster and 63 studios) with communal, ancillary and access facilities. · New long leasehold interest of 250 years, with full vacant possession of the upper floors offered, (Subject to service charge). · Offers are invited in excess of £4,000,000 (FOUR MILLION POUNDS) for the long leasehold of the property, reflecting a low capital value of £45 per sq ft. Subject to contract and exclusive of VAT.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield and Rotherham Retail and Leisure Study 2017
    * First Floor, City Point 29 King Street Leeds LS1 2HL T: +44 (0)8449 02 03 04 F: +44 (0)113 280 8080 Sheffield & Rotherham Joint Retail & Leisure Study Sheffield City Council & Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council February 2017 gva.co.uk Sheffield City Council & Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council Contents Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Planning Policy and Strategy Context ................................................................................................ 4 3. Retail and Leisure Trends .................................................................................................................... 25 4. Sub-regional hierarchy ........................................................................................................................ 35 5. The Sheffield Retail Hierarchy and Health Check Assessments ..................................................... 40 6. The Rotherham Retail Hierarchy and Town Centre Health Checks .............................................. 94 7. The Basis for the Need Assessment for Retail and Leisure Floorspace ........................................ 128 8. Assessment of Need for Retail and Leisure Floorspace in Sheffield ............................................ 139 9. Assessment of need for retail and leisure floorspace in Rotherham ........................................... 160 10. Policy Recommendations ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]