DOCSLIB.ORG

Fungi on Birds in India *

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fungi on Birds in India * FUNGI ON BIRDS IN INDIA * By G. J. F. P u g h Department o f Botany, University o f Nottingham (Received for publication on April 10, 1966) I ntroduction It is well established that numerous fungi are carried by birds, and it has long l»en suspected that birds transport plant pathogenic organisms. Tiffany, Gilman and Murphy (1955) examined the fungi which occurred on birds associated with wilted oaks, while Kouyeas and Anastassiadis (1962) showed that magpies, by building nests con­ taining diseased twigs in healthy trees, can bring about the spread of “ Mai Secco,” a die-back disease of Citrus trees. Fungi pathogenic to animals including man have also been sought on birds. Geese have been examined for Aspergillus fumigatus. causal agent of “ asper­ gillosis,” by Sladen and Austwick (1957), and geese and gulls have been investigated by Beer (1963). More recently a search has been made for keratinophilic fungi on feathers removed from living birds (Pugh, 1964, 1965), and in nest material (Pugh, 1966 a). Keratinophilic fungi are all potentially pathogenic to man, and include the dermato­ phytes. Other human pathogens associated with birds have been discussed by Furcolow, Tosh, Larsh, Lynch and Shaw (1961) and by Partridge and Winner (1965). M a ter ia ls a n d M e t h o d s The feathers used in this survey were removed directly from the breast and underparts of birds obtained in the Madras area. The feathers were placed in sterile envelopes, on which details about the bird were noted. Some of the birds (the golden plovers and the stints) were obtained from trappers in the Kerambakka region immediately after they were caught. The remainder were sampled in Moore Market, Madras. These birds had been in captivity for some time, possibly one or two days, and were kept in cages while waiting to be sold. This factor may have produced some unknown contamination of the birds. However, the birds were kept in cages with other members of the same species; so although there may have been some cross-contamination between birds of the same species it is less likely that other species * Birds were identified using “ The book of Indian birds” by Salim Ali, Bombay Natural History Society, J964. Identifications were checked when posdMe by comparison with specimens in the Natural History Section of Madras Museum. would have been affected. Of fifteen Mynas sampled, three (20%) yielded no fungi, so contaminaton could not have been a very impor­ tant factor. Mynas, parakeets, partridges and quails were sampled from each of several cages, while the crow pheasants and manias were obtained from diiferent cages. In this way it is hoped that the fungal flora obtained from the feathers was representative of the flora on these birds in their natural habitats. In addition to the feathers taken from birds, some unidentifiable feathers were collected at the bird sanctuary at Vedanthangal. In the laboratory, feathers from each bird were placed in a damp chamber consisting of a Petri dish lined with filter-paper which was moistened with sterile water. The large feathers from Vedanthangal were cut up and incubated separately. After incubation at room temperature (about 26° C.) for 3-4 weeks the Petri dishes were exa­ mined for fungal growth. Fungi able to decompose cellulose were found growing on the filter-paper, and those able to attack keratin and other substances were found on the feathers. Fast-growing fungi which use simple soluble carbohydrates were not able to grow under the conditions used. The birds used in this survey are listed in Table 1. Samples were obtained from eleven species, which are classified in six orders; (i) Galliformes, including partridges, quails and red spurfowl. These birds feed on the ground, mainly on seeds and grain. (ii) Cluradriiformes, including golden plovers and stints, which are waders, feeding on various small animals (insects, snails, crabs) in paddy fields and other wet areas. (iii) Columbiformes: the dove, which is another ground feeder, mainly using seeds and grain. (iv) Psittaciformes: the parakeets, which feed on seeds and fruits amongst the foliage. (v) Cuculiformes: the crow pheasant, which feeds on the ground’ mainly on insects and small animals. (vi) Passeriformes, including the Black drongo. which feeds on insects in flight and on the ground, and also on nectar; the munia, which eats seeds on the ground and on the plant; and the mynas, which are omnivorous, feeding mainly on the ground. The great majority of the birds sampled feed on the ground, and mainly eat seeds and fruits. R esu lts The fungi recorded arc listed alphabetically in Table 1. Of the cellulose decomposers the most frequently recorded fungi were Chaetomium spp. (mostly C.globoxum), followed by Curvularia lunata, which was the predominant species, Aspergillus spp. and Memnoniella S Distribution o f fungi on birds caught near Madras. The figures given Partridge— Q uail- Spurfowl — Plover- Stint— FraiKoliiua Calidrix pmduerianus Cotnrmx Galloperdix Phwiali) spp. spadUea dominiea temmenciii (?) AlUrttaria tenuis .. 0 • 3 Atptriillus 1 2 ■ .. 1 BipoUris sp, .. •• .. 2 1 Chidomium bmtrychodet .. .. 1 2 .. 1 1 C. ilatitm .. .. .. .. C. ^lohosnm .. 3 .. 1 ChryKtporimn spp. .. » ft • « 2 2 Cladoiporium htrlninim ,, • • .• 1 Citnoniyces serratns .. 3 2 .. ,. Cun ularia lunata .. 1 1 .. I • • 5 .. tj ■ 1 .. Menmnnietta echinata 1 2 • • Myrothedum rmdum .. j .. Afyxotrichum «p. ..! 1 i , I .. .. Papularia sphtcrinptrma .. j .. 1 •• i •• ; 1 Trickoderma viride .. 1 [! 1 ,. t Sterile hjpha; ., ) Birds with nu fungi .. .. 1 .. C ; 1 Number of fungi .. 0 16 1 » 12 Numtjfr of binis .. 7 j 8 1 7 lU Average No. of fungi per bird 1-5 1 2-0 1 1-3 0-7 i refer to the number of times each fungus was recorded on each bird ■ 1 ■ Crow Black Dove— Piiisk«et- Myna— Monia— j _ , % of Strefttfelia Pheas«nt — PtiUacula Acriihtkeres Drongo— birds chinttiHs Ctntrapu! spp. tristis Dicrurui with tinensis aJsimiJii fun|u8 I 1 i 1 I ' 6 7.fl ■■ ' I .. 1 8 1 1 17-9 • • .. i I 1 .. 4-6 • • 1 ! 2 1 B 1 ' 1 I 32-8 1 1 S 2 15 1 • t •• •• \ 1 J3 ie-4 • « 1 I l-r. ^ * 1 1i ; i 1 * • ^ 0 1 8.« 1 • • 1 ,, 2 9 ! ! 2C-4 « < 1 ; 2 ! B 13-4 j 1 1 1-6 • • • • ' 1 l.fl • • .. • • 1 1-0 • • 2 i 3-0 * 1 1 • ♦ : 1 ; i 3 ;I 4-5 , 1 1 « • ! ' 3 ‘ .. 1 9 ,, i 3 3 i 13 22 : 3 5 ' 9B ,, I 2 7 IS 1 2 87 i » 1-5 ]•» 1-5 i 3 2-5 1-4 1 1 1 •• echinata. Aspergillus, most often found on Mynas, and Chaetomium, most often found on parakeets, were each obtained from seven different bird species; Memnoniella was present on six, while Curvularia was found on four, and was especially common on mynas and plovers. The keratin decomposers were represented by Chrysosporium spp., found on five bird species and especially on partridges and quails, and by Ctenomyces serratus, cleistothecia of which were found on partridges, quails and spurfowl. A surprisingly large number of stints (35%) and mynas (20%) yielded no fungi, while the single drongo and the dove had more fungi on them than did the other birds. In general the number of fungi per bird was rather small. There was a basic similarity in the fungal flora recorded on the birds, and this, perhaps, was to be expected as the birds were mostly ground-feeding seed-eaters. In this survey it was not possible to examine the distribution of fungi in relation to different feeding habits. The 18 feathers collected at Vedanthangal had a sparse fungal flora. Fungi were present on seven, of which four were Chrysosporium spp. and the remainder were sterile hyphae. All seven isolates occurred on dark-coloured feathers, while the while and light-coloured feathers showed no fungal growth despite a careful scarch. D isc u ssio n [n a survey of ccllulolytic and keratinophilic fungi on birds in Britain, Pugh (1965) found that Penicillium spp. occurred on the widest range of birds, and were the most frequently encountered fungi. Oidiodendron spp. were almost as widespread in occurrence although they were much less common than Penicillium. Arthroderma curreyi, Chaetomium spp., Chrysosporium spp. and Cladosporium lierbarum were all fairly often recorded. This distribution is markedly different from the present results, in which Chaetomium spp. were widespread and most frequently isolated. C. globosum, however, was the most common species of this genus in both areas. Aspergillus spp., Chryso­ sporium spp., Curvularia lunata and Memnoniella echinata were all fairly abundantly represented on Indian birds. Aspergillus spp., occurring on almost 18% of the Indian birds, was much more abundant than in Britain, where it was found on 12% of the birds. There was no dominant species of Aspergillus in the Indian results, whereas in Britain, A.fumigatus was the most frequently recorded species. Curvularia and Memnoniella were not found on the British birds, while Chryso­ sporium was almost equally represented, being present on 19-4% of the Indian birds, and 20% of those in Britain. The suggestion (Pugh, 1965) that because the fungi recorded in Britain are cosmopolitan there may well be quantitative differences on birds from other parts of the world appears to have been justified. More important, however, are the large qualitative differences which have now been established. Much more work will have to be carried out before it can be known if these quantitative and qualitative dif­ ferences in mycoflora can be used to plot possible migration paths, as has been done by Ash, HopeJones and Melville (1961) using the pollen masses found on the beaks and head feathers of migrating birds.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yellow-Throated Bulbul Pycnonotus Xantholaemus Feeding on the Aril Of
    Correspondence 59 Arboreal feeding of Grey Junglefowl appears to be a novel behaviour as earlier studies on its foraging ecology did not document this behaviour (Gokula & Vijayan 2000; Gokula 2001; Karthikeyan 2007; Somasundaram & Vijayan 2008; Subramanian et al. 2008; Ramesh & Sathyanarayana 2009; Nirmala 2016; Pankaj, 2017; McGowan & Kirwan, 2020). This also adds Macaranga peltata to the known food plants consumed by Grey Junglefowl in the wild. Acknowledgement Seshadri K. S. I thank the Assistant Wildlife Warden, Thattekkad Bird Sanctuary and Wildlife Warden, Idukki Wildlife Division for support. References 75. A Yellow-throated Bulbul feeding on the aril of an Acacia auriculiformis. Ali, S., & Ripley, S. D., 1983. Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan together with those of Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan and Sri Lanka. Compact ed. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Pp. i–xlii, 1 l., pp. 1–737, 56 ll. The YTB is endemic to parts of southern India and has a Gokula, V., & Vijayan, L., 2000. Foraging pattern of birds during the breeding season disjunct distribution despite being known from nearly 100 in thorn forest of Mudumalai wildlife sanctuary, Tamil Nadu, south India. Tropical localities (Jha & Vasudevan 2020). It is a habitat specialist, Ecology 41: 195–208. Gokula, V., 2001. Foraging patterns of birds in the thorn [forests?] of Mudumalai found in scrub forests in rocky, boulder-strewn landscapes and Wildlife Sanctuary, southern India. Journal of South Asian Natural History 5: is currently listed as a vulnerable species (BirdLife International 143–153. 2021). The YTB is known to consume a higher proportion of Karthikeyan, M., 2007. Avifauna and their habitat utilization in three different habitats fleshy berries compared to insects (Subramanya et al.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of the Birds of Goa, India
    BAIDYA & BHAGAT: Goa checklist 1 A checklist of the birds of Goa, India Pronoy Baidya & Mandar Bhagat Baidya, P., & Bhagat, M., 2018. A checklist of the birds of Goa, India. Indian BIRDS 14 (1): 1–31. Pronoy Baidya, TB-03, Center for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India. And, Foundation for Environment Research and Conservation, C/o 407, III-A, Susheela Seawinds, Alto-Vaddem, Vasco-da-Gama 403802, Goa, India. E-mail: [email protected] [Corresponding author] [PB] Mandar Bhagat, ‘Madhumangal’, New Vaddem,Vasco-da-Gama 403802, Goa, India. E-mail: [email protected] [MB] Manuscript received on 15 November 2017. We dedicate this paper to Heinz Lainer, for his commitment to Goa’s Ornithology. Abstract An updated checklist of the birds of Goa, India, is presented below based upon a collation of supporting information from museum specimens, photographs, audio recordings of calls, and sight records with sufficient field notes. Goa has 473 species of birds of which 11 are endemic to the Western Ghats, 19 fall under various categories of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, and 48 are listed in Schedule I Part (III) of The Indian Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. 451 species have been accepted into the checklist based on specimens in various museums or on photographs, while 22 have been accepted based on sight record. A secondary list of unconfirmed records is also discussed in detail. Introduction that is about 125 km long. The southern portion of these ghats, Goa, India’s smallest state, sandwiched between the Arabian within Goa, juts out towards the Arabian Sea, at Cabo de Rama, Sea in the west and the Western Ghats in the east, is home to and then curves inland.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Seshachalam Biosphere Reserve, South-Eastern Ghats of Andhra Pradesh, India
    Vol. 7(12), pp. 435-452, December 2015 DOI: 10.5897/IJBC2015.0882 Article number: 081BCBC56733 International Journal of Biodiversity ISSN: 2141-243X Copyright © 2015 and Conservation Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/IJBC Full Length Research Paper Birds of Seshachalam biosphere reserve, South-eastern Ghats of Andhra Pradesh, India M. Bubesh Guptha1*, S. Kishore2, N. V. Sivarama Prasad3 and P. V. Chalapathi Rao4 1Bio-Lab of Seshachalam Hills, Wildlife Management Circle, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh - 517 507, India. 2Department of Zoology, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3Bio-Lab of Seshachalam Hills, Wildlife Management Circle, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh - 517 507, India. 4 Forests, Wildlife Management Circle, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh - 517 507, India. Received 28 July, 2015; Accepted 1 October, 2015 The Seshachalam hill is the first declared biosphere reserve in Andhra Pradesh and is located in the southern Eastern Ghats of Chittoor and Kadapa districts. The vegetation comprises of a unique mix of the tropical southern dry mixed deciduous type. The study was carried out from August 2011 to February 2014. The study recorded 215 species of birds, which belong to 45 families. Among which 172 species (80%) were resident, 30 (14%) winter migrant, 8 (4%) seasonal local migrant and 5 (2%) and local migrant. 88 species were found common (C); followed by 91 species uncommon (UC); 15 species rare (R); 14 species occasional (O) and 7 species were found very rare (VR). Passeriform birds are the dominating order of birds, more than 14 families and 79 species of birds were recorded. During the bird survey IUCN status was also gathered, out of 215 species, (n = 208), 97% species were Least Concern (LR-lc), (n = 4), 2% species were Near Threatened (LR-nt) and (n = 3), 1% species were Vulnerable (VU) status.
    [Show full text]
  • Kanha Bird Checklist (Pdf)
    KANHA BIRD SURVEY - CHECKLIST Expected Species eBird 'English (India)' Local name eBird scientific name status Detection 17/03 18/03 19/03 Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica R Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna ferruginea W Cotton Pygmy-Goose Nettapus coromandelianus R Gadwall Anas strepera W Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope W Indian Spot-billed Duck Anas poecilorhyncha R Northern Pintail Anas acuta W Garganey Anas querquedula W Green-winged Teal (Common Teal) Anas crecca W Indian Peafowl Pavo cristatus R Red Spurfowl Galloperdix spadicea R Jungle Bush-Quail Perdicula asiatica R Painted Francolin Francolinus pictus R H Grey Francolin Francolinus pondicerianus R H Red Junglefowl Gallus gallus R H Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis R Asian Openbill Anastomus oscitans R Black Stork Ciconia nigra W Woolly-necked Stork Ciconia episcopus R Lesser Adjutant Leptoptilos javanicus R Little Cormorant Microcarbo niger R Great Cormorant Phalacrocorax carbo R Indian Cormorant (Indian Shag) Phalacrocorax fuscicollis R Oriental Darter Anhinga melanogaster R Grey Heron Ardea cinerea R Purple Heron Ardea purpurea R Great Egret Ardea alba R Intermediate Egret Mesophoyx intermedia R Little Egret Egretta garzetta R Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis R Indian Pond-Heron Ardeola grayii R Threskiornis Black-headed Ibis melanocephalus R Red-naped Ibis (Indian Black Ibis) Pseudibis papillosa R Black-shouldered Kite Elanus caeruleus R (Black-winged Kite) Crested (Oriental) Honey Buzzard Pernis ptilorhynchus R White-rumped Vulture Gyps bengalensis R Indian Vulture (Indian Long-billed
    [Show full text]
  • Peacock-Pheasants and Asiatic Spurfowl
    Above: Adult male Burmese Grey Chinquis Polyplectron b. bicalcaratum in its native habitat. Note multiple metatarsal kicking thorns. Photo P. Kittipinyowat. PEACOCK-PHEASANTS AND ASIATIC SPURFOWL By: Kermit Blackwood (USA) PART 1 INTRODUCTION TO PEACOCK-PHEASANTS In this article, we examine in detail several tropical Asian galliforms frequently mentioned in technical ornithological literature but rarely discussed at length, the peacock-pheasants, those members of the genus Polyplectron, conventionally considered *a as deep forest-adapted, evolutionary prototypes of the larger and even more elaborately plumaged argus and peafowl. A theory that’s become a matter of tradition places the peacock-pheasant as a phylogenetic link between pheasants and peafowl. In this article we will have an additional look at some obscure galliforms even more poorly known than peacock-pheasants, namely the mysterious, Crimson-headed partridge (Haematortyx sanguiniceps) endemic to the mountains of Borneo and the Indian Subcontinent’s enigmatic Asiatic spurfowl of the genus Galloperdix. These two genera share a number of unusual features with peacock-pheasants that may suggest a monophyletic origin. Nine peacock-pheasant species are presently recognised, all united within the genus Polyplectron. Two forms once identified as subspecies by some authors are currently regarded as distinct species. The Hainan peacock-pheasant P. katsumatae and the Bornean peacock-pheasant P. schleiermacheri were both treated as distinct species until Jean Delacour’s reclassification scheme circa 1977, when each were demoted to subspecific status; the Hainan as subspecific of the Grey and the Bornean as a subspecies of the Malayan. Biogeographical, molecular, morphological and phenotypic datas have re- established their species status.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds, Frogs, and Workers Wildlife in the Coffee Fields of Southern India
    Birds, Frogs, and Workers Wildlife in the Coffee Fields of Southern India Anthropocene Earth systems dominated by anthropogenic forces Climate change Ecological Novelty Altered geomorphology Altered biogeochemistry Land Sparing…. Land Sharing…? “Producing wildlife: Biodiversity conservation in dynamic commodity landscapes” • National Science Foundation (NSF #7153185) – Dr. Krithi Karanth – Centre for Wildlife Studies, WCS • Collaborative investigation (NSF #1153944) – Dr. Ashwini Chhatre – Bharti Institute of Public Policy, Indian School of Business, Hyderabad Forest-Plantation Landscape mosaic (Faria et al., 2006; Gardner et al., 2006) Structural complexity of habitat (Tscharntke et al., 2005) Some taxa adapt better than others (Daily et al., 2001) Small and fragmented PAs Insufficient literature ▪ Single taxon, land-use type ▪ Spatial-scale and sample size • Natural vegetation – evergreen, moist-deciduous and dry deciduous forests, and montane grasslands • Faunal diversity – includes 30% of all Indian plant and vertebrate species. • Land Uses – Compared to formal conservation areas (<12% of the landscape) and – traditional conservation systems such as sacred groves (<1%) – agro-forestry areas cover a much larger proportion of the landscape o 65 areca o 61 coffee o 61 rubber 29634 km2 area 187 plantations Dry season sampling 7 minute point-counts (386 sampling hours) 200 meters distance 551 point-counts 6 temporal replicates 6 INTERNS ©SD/KKK/NSF 11 VOLUNTEERS ©SD/KKK/NSF ©Prasenjit Yadav ©Prasenjit Yadav ©Prasenjit Yadav ©Prasenjit Yadav Malabar Trogon Red Spurfowl White-bellied Woodpecker ©Ramki S Greater Racket- tailed Drongo ©Ramki S ©Ramki S Orange-headed Thrush Banded Bay Cuckoo ©Ramki S ©Ramki S ©Ramki S Malabar Woodshrike Malabar Barbet Grey-headed Bulbul ©Ramki S ©Ramki S Malabar Parakeet Flame-throated Bulbul ©Ramki S Hill Myna ©Ramki S ©Ramki S ©Ramki S Brown-breasted Flycatcher Asian Paradise Flycatcher Tickell’s Leaf Wabler ©Ramki S ©Ramki S ©Ramki S Kashmir Flycatcher Blue-tailed Bee-eater ©Ramki S ©Ramki S Areca Coffee Rubber No.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Forest Owlet Prospective Bird List As
    India: Forest Owlet Short Tour POTENTIAL BIRD LIST: The following is a list of species seen on a recent scouting trip in preparation for this tour. The order, English and scientific names follow those used in the recommended field guide for this tour - Rasmussen, P. C. and Anderton, J. C. (2005) Birds of South Asia. The Ripley Guide. Vols. 1 and 2. Smithsonian Institution and Lynx Edicions, Washington D.C. and Barcelona. Codes against the bird names indicate globally-threatened species as defined by BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-Rom Cambridge, U.K. BirdLife International as follows: CR = Critically Endangered End = Subcontinent endemic IN-End = Indian Endemic Painted Francolin (End) Francolinus pictus Jungle Bush Quail Perdicula asiatica Red Spurfowl Galloperdix spadicea Indian Peafowl (End) Pavo cristatus Little Grebe Tachybaptus ruficollis Asian Openbill Anastomus oscitans Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis melanocephalus Red-naped Ibis Pseudibis papillosa Indian Pond Heron Ardeola grayii Eastern Cattle Egret Bubulcus coromandus Great Egret Ardea alba Intermediate Egret Ardea intermedia Little Egret Egretta garzetta Little Cormorant Microcarbo niger Black-winged Kite Elanus caeruleus Crested Honey Buzzard Pernis ptilorhynchus Indian Vulture (CR) (End) Gyps indicus Crested Serpent Eagle Spilornis cheela Short-toed Snake Eagle Circaetus gallicus Black Eagle Ictinaetus malaiensis Shikra Accipiter badius White-eyed Buzzard Butastur teesa Eurasian Coot Fulica atra Indian Stone-curlew Burhinus indicus Red-wattled
    [Show full text]
  • Research Article
    Available Online at http://www.recentscientific.com International Journal of Recent Scientific International Journal of Recent Scientific Research Research Vol. 7, Issue, 11, pp. 14286-14290, November, 2016 ISSN: 0976-3031 Research Article AVIFAUNA DIVERSITY OF MALATWADI AND ITS VICINITY, CHANDGAD TASHIL, KOLHAPUR, SOUTHERN MAHARASHTRA Hiragond N. C., Patil M. S and Lokhande A. S Department of Zoology, Yashwantrao Chavan College, Halkarni – 416 552, Tq. Chandgad, Dt. Kolhapur, Maharashtra, India ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article History: Studies are carried out to record the avifauna diversity in Malatwadi and its adjacent area of Chandgad tashil in Kolhapur district of southern Maharashtra. Field work was carried out from Received 16th August, 2016 th January 2012 to October 2012. A total of 123 bird species were documented belonging to 18 orders, Received in revised form 25 58 families and 103 genera. Passeriformes alone represents 52% (64) of the total bird species September, 2016 followed by Ciconiformes (12) and Falconiformes (8). Ten orders represented by 6-2 bird species. Accepted 23rd October, 2016 th Anseriformes, Podicipediformes, Caprimulgiformes, Apodiformes and Upupiformes consists one Published online 28 November, 2016 bird species each. Among the families Accipitridae consist maximum (7) number of bird species. Fourteen families represented by 5-3 bird species and rest of the families represent one or two bird Key Words: species. Avifauna, Checklist, Chandgad, Malatwadi, Kowad Copyright © Hiragond N. C et al., 2016, this is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTH INDIA Endemics of the Western Ghats
    SOUTH INDIA Endemics of the Western Ghats A Tropical Birding Set Departure January 12-19, 2019 Guides: Ken Behrens and Keith Barnes Report and photos by Ken Behrens TOUR SUMMARY The riches of the Indian Subcontinent are well known. There is remarkable diversity, from the deserts of the west, to the Himalayas of the north, to the Nilgiri mountains of the southwest. The latter was the focus of this short trip that immediately preceded our Sri Lanka set-departure tour. The Western Ghats are the richest part of India for endemic birds, and this short trip was focused on seeing as many of these as possible. We were quite successful, locating 33 Indian endemic birds, most of which are only found in the Western Ghats, and some of which are highly local even within that zone. This endemic tally neatly matched that of Sri Lanka, where we found all of the island’s 33 endemic birds. So those who did both trips went home with 66 endemic birds, a good total for a 3-week trip anywhere in the world. Beyond the endemic birds, southern India offers the kaleidoscopic cultural riches that are typical of India: bustling towns, mountainside temples, elaborately decorated trucks, women in beautiful saris, delicious food, and so on. One thing that is nice about the south, Kerala in particular, is that while offering a typically rich Indian experience, it is much more organized and relaxed than other parts of India, which can be intimidating for a first-time visitor. South India also has stunning scenery. Although the Himalayas spring to mind when you think of towering Indian South India: Western Ghats Endemics January 12-19, 2019 mountains, the southern mountains are impressive in their own right, shooting from sea level to well over 8000 feet (2400m).
    [Show full text]
  • Painted Spurfowl: a Resident Bird That 'Chooses' Its Hills with a Fine-Toothed
    Source : www.thehindu.com Date : 2021-03-03 PAINTED SPURFOWL: A RESIDENT BIRD THAT ‘CHOOSES’ ITS HILLS WITH A FINE-TOOTHED COMB Relevant for: Environment | Topic: Biodiversity, Ecology, and Wildlife Related Issues A male and female Painted Spurfowl at Natham-Vallapakkam range in Vellore. Photo: Rama Neelamegam | Photo Credit: Rama Neelamegam Three bitter phasianidae realities birders from Peninsular India have to swallow. Taking its name seriously, the delectably-coloured Himalayan Monal keeps to that region, fancying real estate that comes with an elevation of 10,000 ft, give or take a couple of thousands. So, a monal sighting is much effort, much time and a few travel tickets away. The Golden Pheasant, also strikingly-painted, is not within easy range, and can even be safely called out-of-bounds. Though endemic to western China’s mountainous ranges, it has populated scattered parts in the rest of the world as feral populations, but none of these is in India. The unkindest cut of all: the Painted Spurfowl — as with the other two, the male is right out of a canvas — belongs to peninsular India. But not every peninsular birding soul is deemed worthy to have a Painted Spurfowl sighting in their backyard. The bird’s habitat is a combination of scrub environment and hilly terrain, but it chooses such properties with a fine-feathered comb. So, you will find this species in the Natham-Vallapakkam range in Vellore, around 150 km from Chennai. But not in the Kumizhi hills near Guduvancherry; not in the hillocks in Pallavaram; not in the Vandalur area; nor at the hillocks around Mailai village on the road from Tiruporur to Chengelpet, though the non-decrepit village with its hillocks is known for another famous phasianidae, the Indian peacock.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF of Birds Checklist
    RajasthanBiodiversity.org Birds of Rajasthan A comprehensive compiled list of birds from various checklist This checklist is a comprehensive compiled list of birds from various checklist which possibly includes all bird species found in Rajasthan till April 2020. This list is a result of in-depth analysis of Helm Field Guide on Birds of Indian subcontinent by Richard Grimmett, Carol Inskipp and Tim Inskipp. The list prepared was compared with all the major checklists available for Rajasthan that includes eBird checklist, BNHS-ENVIS checklist, Birds of Rajasthan a book by Rakesh Vyas and minor differences among these lists were noted down. The present list doesn’t skip any species ever recorded in Rajasthan and presents a comprehensive list of 561 extant and extinct bird species. This checklist is presented as a service to birdwatchers. If you find any error, please do not hesitate to report them at [email protected]. Birds of Indian Sub-continent, Birds of Rajasthan, Rakesh Remarks S. No. Common Name Scientific name eBird (476) BNHS (478) Grimmett et. al. (501) Vyas (475) (According to “Birds of Indian Sub-continent”) FRANCOLINS 1 Black Francolin Francolinus francolinus Y Y Y Y 2 Painted Francolin Francolinus pictus Y Y Y Y 3 Grey Francolin Francolinus pondicerianus Y Y Y Y QUAILS 4 King Quail (Blue-breasted Quail) Coturnix chinensis Y N Y Y Historic Record 5 Rain Quail Coturnix coromandelica Y Y Y Y 6 Common Quail (Grey Quail) Coturnix coturnix Y Y Y Y BUSH QUAILS 7 Rock Bush Quail Perdicula argoondah Y Y Y Y 8 Jungle Bush
    [Show full text]
  • The India Checklist
    The India Checklist VOL. 11 NOS. 5 & 6 | Vol. 11 Nos. 5 & 6 11 | Vol. BIRDS Indian CONTENTS Indian BIRDS 113 A checklist of the birds of India www.indianbirds.in VOL. 11 NOS. 5 & 6 Praveen J., Rajah Jayapal & Aasheesh Pittie DATE OF PUBLICATION: 14 JULY 2016 Introduction ISSN 0973-1407 113 How to use the India Checklist EDITOR: Aasheesh Pittie 118 [email protected] The India Checklist ASSOCIATE EDITORS: V. Santharam, Praveen J. 123 EDITORIAL BOARD Appendix 1. List of bird species known/presumed/hypothesised to occur in South Asia, Maan Barua, Anwaruddin Choudhury 165 Bill Harvey, Farah Ishtiaq, Rajah Jayapal, Girish Jathar but excluded from the India Checklist either for want of corroboration, or on account of Ragupathy Kannan, Madhusudan Katti their absence from Indian limits R. Suresh Kumar, Taej Mundkur, Rishad Naoroji Prasad Ganpule, Suhel Quader Appendix 2. List of bird species endemic to India Harkirat Singh Sangha, C. Sashikumar 169 Manoj Sharma, S. Subramanya, K. S. Gopi Sundar 172 Index CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHERS Clement Francis, Ramki Sreenivasan LAYOUT & COVER DESIGN: K. Jayaram OffICE: P. Rambabu Editorial NEW ORNIS FOUNDATION The publication of the India Checklist is a milestone for Indian Registration No. 314/2004 ornithology—as it is a first. Ideally, a rarities committee is an essential part of such an exercise. It’s brief is to whet records that FOUNDER TRUSTEES Zafar Futehally (1920–2013) add new species to the country list, or grapple with the provenance Aasheesh Pittie, V. Santharam of those that perch on the branch of hypotheticals. Since such a committee does not exist in India, the authors of this checklist TRUSTEES were at pains—communicating worldwide with specialists, original Aasheesh Pittie, V.
    [Show full text]