The India Checklist

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The India Checklist The India Checklist VOL. 11 NOS. 5 & 6 | Vol. 11 Nos. 5 & 6 11 | Vol. BIRDS Indian CONTENTS Indian BIRDS 113 A checklist of the birds of India www.indianbirds.in VOL. 11 NOS. 5 & 6 Praveen J., Rajah Jayapal & Aasheesh Pittie DATE OF PUBLICATION: 14 JULY 2016 Introduction ISSN 0973-1407 113 How to use the India Checklist EDITOR: Aasheesh Pittie 118 [email protected] The India Checklist ASSOCIATE EDITORS: V. Santharam, Praveen J. 123 EDITORIAL BOARD Appendix 1. List of bird species known/presumed/hypothesised to occur in South Asia, Maan Barua, Anwaruddin Choudhury 165 Bill Harvey, Farah Ishtiaq, Rajah Jayapal, Girish Jathar but excluded from the India Checklist either for want of corroboration, or on account of Ragupathy Kannan, Madhusudan Katti their absence from Indian limits R. Suresh Kumar, Taej Mundkur, Rishad Naoroji Prasad Ganpule, Suhel Quader Appendix 2. List of bird species endemic to India Harkirat Singh Sangha, C. Sashikumar 169 Manoj Sharma, S. Subramanya, K. S. Gopi Sundar 172 Index CONTRIBUTING PHOTOGRAPHERS Clement Francis, Ramki Sreenivasan LAYOUT & COVER DESIGN: K. Jayaram OffICE: P. Rambabu Editorial NEW ORNIS FOUNDATION The publication of the India Checklist is a milestone for Indian Registration No. 314/2004 ornithology—as it is a first. Ideally, a rarities committee is an essential part of such an exercise. It’s brief is to whet records that FOUNDER TRUSTEES Zafar Futehally (1920–2013) add new species to the country list, or grapple with the provenance Aasheesh Pittie, V. Santharam of those that perch on the branch of hypotheticals. Since such a committee does not exist in India, the authors of this checklist TRUSTEES were at pains—communicating worldwide with specialists, original Aasheesh Pittie, V. Santharam, Rishad Naoroji, observers, photographers, museum collection curators, etc.—to Taej Mundkur, S. Subramanya, Suhel Quader, Praveen J. scrutinise every hypothetical, or new record before including, or excluding a species. AIMS & OBJECTIVES • To publish a newsletter that will provide a platform to The formation of an Indian Birds Records and Rarities birdwatchers for publishing notes and observations Committee has been discussed at Indian BIRDS for some time primarily on birds of South Asia. now, and with the publication of the India Checklist, it's time this • To promote awareness of birdwatching amongst the is furthered. Publication of updates to the India Checklist should general public. ideally be entrusted to such a committee. Till one is formed, the authors will publish updates keeping up with the ornithology of • To establish and maintain links/liaison with other associations or organized bodies in India or abroad the times. whose objectives are in keeping with the objectives of the Trust (i.e. to support amateur birdwatchers with Faunal checklists are not static, but dynamic by their very cash / kind for projects in ornithology). nature—as they record a living world. They need to change quickly when required, or they become redundant. The molecular studies UBSCRIPTION nfORMATION revolution sweeping through avian systematics and taxonomy, S I and the phenomenal increase in the numbers of birdwatchers, Type Annual 3-year and photographers in India, are drivers that will ensure changes to Individual Rs. 300 Rs. 900 the India Checklist in future. To keep up with the jacanas, Indian Institution Rs. 800 Rs. 2,400 Foreign Individual $30 $90 BIRDS will upload updates of the India Checklist on its website. Foreign Institution $85 $225 Besides this, we will also upload it in Excel format to enable users to modify it for personal use. – Aasheesh Pittie Please make payments favouring NEW ORNIS FOUNDATION For online payment: http://www.indianbirds.in/subscription-india/ Send subscriptions to: FRONT COVER & BACK COVER: All the families of Indian birds New Ornis Foundation, 2nd Flr, BBR Forum, Rd. No. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, India. ARTIST: Rohan Chakravarty PRAVEEN, JAYAPAL & PITTIE: The India Checklist 113 A checklist of the birds of India Praveen J., Rajah Jayapal & Aasheesh Pittie Praveen J., Jayapal, R., & Pittie, A., 2016. A checklist of the birds of India. Indian BIRDS 11 (5&6): 113–172. Praveen J., B303, Shriram Spurthi, ITPL Main Road, Brookefields, Bengaluru 560037, Karnataka, India. E-mail: [email protected] Rajah Jayapal, Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History, Anaikatty (Post), Coimbatore 641108, Tamil Nadu, India. E-mail: [email protected] [Corresponding author]. Aasheesh Pittie, 2nd Floor, BBR Forum, Road No. 2, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad 500034, Telangana, India. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper presents a definitive Checklist of birds of India (‘the India Checklist’) in a modern taxonomy. We have reviewed all the past records of bird species from within the political boundaries of the Republic of India and have included only those species whose occurrence within the country is well corroborated. In this process, we follow ‘The Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World’ (4th Edition) for taxonomy and species sequence. In total, the India Checklist acknowledges inclusion of 1263 species of birds out of which 61 (4.8%) are endemic to India. Taxonomically, it covers 23 orders, 107 families, and 498 genera. We hope that the India Checklist—a systematic, peer-reviewed baseline data for the country’s avifauna— will standardise the taxonomy, and nomenclature, of Indian birds and will streamline communications in Indian ornithology. We also plan to regularly update the India Checklist online, which will be freely available to all users. Introduction comprehensive inventory of the birds of British India (including A brief history of Indian checklists Myanmar), based on the Fauna, with some additions. Recognising the need for a revision of the Indian bird list, since the publication The Republic of India (hereinafter, India), with a geographical of the first of Fauna series in 1890s, E. C. Stuart Baker published land area of 32,87,263 sq. km. (Anon. 2015), ranks among the an updated ‘hand-list’ of the birds of British India, along with their top ten countries in the world in terms of most number of bird distribution ranges, first as a series of papers in theJournal of species (Lepage 2016); covering 2.2% of the world’s terrestrial the Bombay Natural History Society (hereinafter, JBNHS; Baker landmass, India is known to harbour about 12.5% of its avifauna. 1920, 1921a,b,c, 1922a,b,c, 1923a), and later as a standalone This spectacular diversity is believed to have arisen from multiple hand book (1923b); He was subsequently commissioned to factors that include its unique biogeographical, and ecological write the eight-volume series on the birds of India (1922d, 1924, history, its heterogeneity of physical features, and a high degree 1926, 1927, 1928, 1929,1930a,b), as part of the second edition of eco-climatic variations—ranging from tropical to temperate. of the Fauna of British India series (hereinafter, New Fauna). Given this avifaunal richness, and the fact that scientific Indian Over the next 30 years, the New Fauna served as an authoritative ornithology goes back three centuries, it may surprise many that reference on the birds of the Subcontinent. the total number of bird species recorded from India is still a This period also witnessed a sea change in our understanding matter of conjecture, often drawn from regional ornithological of avian taxonomy and species sequence, with two of the most literature. A definite number is still elusive in the absence of an influential classifications of the time—one by Alexander Wetmore authentic checklist of the country’s avifauna. (1960), and the other by J. L. Peters and his successors (1931– Edward Blyth (1850a,b, 1851) first compiled and published a three-part checklist of birds of the erstwhile British Dominions 1987)—being increasingly adopted by ornithological societies in South Asia. This was followed, a decade later, by T. C. Jerdon’s and institutions worldwide. Back home, Biswamoy Biswas (1952) monumental two-volume treatise (published in three parts) ‘The compiled a reference list of the genera of Indian birds. With a birds of India’ (1862, 1863, 1864), which was also the first view to presenting an annotated checklist of the Subcontinent’s systematic attempt in the Indian Subcontinent (hereinafter, the birds in conformity with modern taxonomy, S. D. Ripley II (1961, Subcontinent) to assign English names to Indian birds, as they 1982) published his Synopsis following Wetmore’s classification. were, till then, only known by their ‘Latin’ names. Jerdon’s works The ‘Synopsis’ is perhaps the first systematic checklist of the birds were edited and reprinted by H. H. Godwin-Austen (Jerdon of the Subcontinent, in post-independent India, with detailed 1877a,b,c) with additional notes that Jerdon had published in Ibis, annotations on distribution, status, and movements of each taxon post the original edition. In 1879, A. O. Hume prepared a ‘rough at the subspecies level. It was also the basis for the monumental tentative list of birds of India’ updating Jerdon’s list. But it was ten-volume Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan towards the end of the nineteenth century that the region’s first (hereinafter, Handbook) (Ali & Ripley 1968–1974, 1978–1983a, encyclopedic work on its avifauna was published, in four volumes, 1986, 1996–1999), widely regarded as the ‘Bible’ in Indian in the ‘Fauna of British India’ (hereinafter, Fauna) series; Eugene ornithological literature; also hugely popular in its ‘Compact Oates (1889, 1890) authored the first two volumes, and William Edition’ (Ali & Ripley 1983b, 1987). Both the Synopsis, and the Blanford (1895, 1898), the latter. At around the same time, Handbook—particularly for the passerines—drew heavily on the James A. Murray brought out his compendium on the avifauna unpublished manuscripts of Hugh Whistler (1889–1943), and C. of British India and its dependencies (including Afghanistan and B.
Recommended publications
  • Birdquest 15Th November 2011
    SOUTHERN INDIA & SRI LANKA Including The Andaman Islands 15/21 NOVEMBER – 10 DECEMBER 2011 TOUR REPORT LEADER: DAVE FARROW This was the first Birdquest to combine Southern India with Sri Lanka, and it proved to be a winning combination, further enhanced by a six day pre-extension to the Andaman Islands. This allowed us to see a total of 394 species that included a fantastic variety of South Asian endemics. On the Andaman Islands we saw all 20 of the available endemics, we had stunning views of jay-walking Andaman Crake, plus Andaman Cuckoo-Dove, Andaman Serpent Eagle, Andaman Woodpigeons, a flock of 18 Andaman Treepies and a surprise Malayan Night Heron. In Tamil Nadu and Kerala we had memorable encounters with Painted Bush Quail, Red Spurfowl, White-bellied Minivet, White-bellied Treepie, Black-and-orange Flycatchers, Nilgiri Blue Robin, Kerala and Black-chinned Laughingthrushes, Nilgiri Pipit and Nilgiri Woodpigeon, finding all but a handful of the regional endemics despite struggling with heavy rain and a strike. In Sri Lanka we cleaned up all of the 35 known endemics, with the Red-faced Malkoha taking the longest to find, yet Ceylon Spurfowl and Ceylon Scaly Thrush both showed atypically well and we had great looks at Ceylon Whistling-thrush. From the very first evening of the tour, the theme of nightbirds featured strongly. In total we recorded 15 species of Owl, with 23 individuals of 14 species seen, 15 of which were in daytime! In addition we saw five species of Nightjar, and three Ceylon Frogmouths. From the Andamans we had great encounters with Andaman and Hume’s Hawk Owls, Andaman and Oriental Scops Owls, Andaman Barn Owl and Andaman Nightjar.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Human Activity on Foraging Flocks and Populations of the Alpine Chough Pyrrhocorax Graculus
    Avocetta N°19: 189-193 (1995) Impact of human activity on foraging flocks and populations of the alpine chough Pyrrhocorax graculus ANNE DELESTRADE Centre de Biologie des Ecosystèmes d'Altitude, Université de Pau, 64000 Pau, France. Present address: Institut d'écologie, CNRS URA 258, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 7 qua i St Bernard, 75252 Paris, France. Abstract - The Alpine Chough Pyrrhocorax graculus is a social corvid which uses food provided by tourist activities in mountain regions (e.g. at ski stations, refuse dumps, picnic areas). In order to determine the impact ofthe human food supply on the Alpine Chough, foraging flock size and distribution were studied in a tourist region in the Northern French Alps between 1988 and 1992. Alpine Chough attendance at tourist sites was closely related to human activities. Activity rhytbrn was influenced by human presence on picnic area in summer. Relations to human activities held at a seasonal scale (such as opening of a ski station) but not at a daily time scale (such as weekend). Long term trends of Alpine Chough populations since intense tourist development at altitude are discussed with regard of flock size counts recorded at a same site before and after intense tourist development. Introduction a little studied species, and it is particularly uncertain whether Alpine Chough populations have increased Availability of food is a factor which influences the since the intense development of tourist activities in distribution and abundance of species at a range of mountains. spatial and temporal scales. Many bird species forage The aims of this study were (1) to determine whether in human related habitats (Murton and Wright 1968), the Alpine Chough adapted its foraging behaviour to and food supplied by man (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Tc & Forward & Owls-I-IX
    USDA Forest Service 1997 General Technical Report NC-190 Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere Second International Symposium February 5-9, 1997 Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Editors: James R. Duncan, Zoologist, Manitoba Conservation Data Centre Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Department of Natural Resources Box 24, 200 Saulteaux Crescent Winnipeg, MB CANADA R3J 3W3 <[email protected]> David H. Johnson, Wildlife Ecologist Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 600 Capitol Way North Olympia, WA, USA 98501-1091 <[email protected]> Thomas H. Nicholls, retired formerly Project Leader and Research Plant Pathologist and Wildlife Biologist USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station 1992 Folwell Avenue St. Paul, MN, USA 55108-6148 <[email protected]> I 2nd Owl Symposium SPONSORS: (Listing of all symposium and publication sponsors, e.g., those donating $$) 1987 International Owl Symposium Fund; Jack Israel Schrieber Memorial Trust c/o Zoological Society of Manitoba; Lady Grayl Fund; Manitoba Hydro; Manitoba Natural Resources; Manitoba Naturalists Society; Manitoba Critical Wildlife Habitat Program; Metro Propane Ltd.; Pine Falls Paper Company; Raptor Research Foundation; Raptor Education Group, Inc.; Raptor Research Center of Boise State University, Boise, Idaho; Repap Manitoba; Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada; USDI Bureau of Land Management; USDI Fish and Wildlife Service; USDA Forest Service, including the North Central Forest Experiment Station; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; The Wildlife Society - Washington Chapter; Wildlife Habitat Canada; Robert Bateman; Lawrence Blus; Nancy Claflin; Richard Clark; James Duncan; Bob Gehlert; Marge Gibson; Mary Houston; Stuart Houston; Edgar Jones; Katherine McKeever; Robert Nero; Glenn Proudfoot; Catherine Rich; Spencer Sealy; Mark Sobchuk; Tom Sproat; Peter Stacey; and Catherine Thexton.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complete Species-Level Molecular Phylogeny For
    Author's personal copy Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47 (2008) 251–260 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A complete species-level molecular phylogeny for the ‘‘Eurasian” starlings (Sturnidae: Sturnus, Acridotheres, and allies): Recent diversification in a highly social and dispersive avian group Irby J. Lovette a,*, Brynn V. McCleery a, Amanda L. Talaba a, Dustin R. Rubenstein a,b,c a Fuller Evolutionary Biology Program, Laboratory of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14950, USA b Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA c Department of Integrative Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA Received 2 August 2007; revised 17 January 2008; accepted 22 January 2008 Available online 31 January 2008 Abstract We generated the first complete phylogeny of extant taxa in a well-defined clade of 26 starling species that is collectively distributed across Eurasia, and which has one species endemic to sub-Saharan Africa. Two species in this group—the European starling Sturnus vulgaris and the common Myna Acridotheres tristis—now occur on continents and islands around the world following human-mediated introductions, and the entire clade is generally notable for being highly social and dispersive, as most of its species breed colonially or move in large flocks as they track ephemeral insect or plant resources, and for associating with humans in urban or agricultural land- scapes. Our reconstructions were based on substantial mtDNA (4 kb) and nuclear intron (4 loci, 3 kb total) sequences from 16 species, augmented by mtDNA NDII gene sequences (1 kb) for the remaining 10 taxa for which DNAs were available only from museum skin samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Geolocator Tracking Data and Ringing Archives to Validate Citizen-Science Based Seasonal Predictions of Bird Distribution in a Data-Poor Region
    Global Ecology and Conservation 24 (2020) e01215 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Global Ecology and Conservation journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/gecco Original Research Article Using geolocator tracking data and ringing archives to validate citizen-science based seasonal predictions of bird distribution in a data-poor region * Wieland Heim a, , Ramona J. Heim a, Ilka Beermann a, Oleg A. Burkovskiy b, Yury Gerasimov c, Pavel Ktitorov d, e, Kiyoaki Ozaki f, Ilya Panov g, h, Martha Maria Sander i, Sissel Sjoberg€ j, Sergei M. Smirenski k, Alexander Thomas l, Anders P. Tøttrup o, Ivan M. Tiunov m, Mikkel Willemoes n, Norbert Holzel€ a, Kasper Thorup j, Johannes Kamp a, p a Institute of Landscape Ecology, University of Münster, Germany b Sakhalin Energy, Investment Company LTD, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia c Kamchatka Department of Pacific Geographical Institute, Far-eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Science, Petropavlovsk- Kamchatskiy, Russia d Institute of Biological Problems of the North, Far-eastern Branch of Russian Academy of Science, Magadan, Russia e Birds Russia, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, Russia f Yamashina Institute for Ornithology, Chiba, Japan g Bird Ringing Centre of Russia, IPEE RAS, Russia h Biological Station Rybachy, ZIN RAS, Russia i Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Italy j Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark k Muraviovka Park for Sustainable Land Use, Blagoveshchensk, Russia l School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China m Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia n Department of Biology, Lund University, Sweden o Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark p University of Gottingen,€ Department of Conservation Biology, Bürgerstr.
    [Show full text]
  • EIA & EMP Report
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN OF River bed mining of Minor Minerals Block No. 11, K-Mirhama Upstream Vishu Nalla Proposal No. SIA/JK/MIN/60760/2021 File No. JKEIAA/2021/476 Block no. 11 Area 9.21 HA Production 1,93,410TPA Location Village – Dhamhal Hanjipora, Tehsil- D.H. Pora District- Kulgam, Jammu & Kashmir APPLICANT Shri. Hem Chand Singh S/o Sh. Rohitash Singh R/o H.No.06 Kashish Enclave 3K Road Ludhiana, State/UT: Punjab Table of Content Draft EIA/EMP for Riverbed Mining Project of Minor Mineral in Block No.11, K-Mirhama Upstream Vishu Nalla, District-Kulgam, State-Jammu & Kashmir. (Area 9.21) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS TITLE PAGE NO CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.0 Purpose of the Report 1 1.1 Identification of project & project proponent 2 1.2 Brief description of project 3 1.3 Scope of the Study 7 CHAPTER 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.0 Type of Project 32 2.1 Need for the project 32 2.2 Location Details 32 2.3 Topography & Geology 34 2.4 Geological Reserve 36 2.5 Conceptual Mining Plan 38 2.6 Anticipated Life of Mine 38 2.7 General Features 38 CHAPTER 3 BASELINE ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS 3.0 General 42 3.1 Land Environment of the Study Area 43 3.2 Water Environment 45 3.3 Air Environment 53 3.4 Soil Environment 58 3.5 Noise Characteristics 61 3.6 Biological Environment 63 3.7 Socio-Economic Environment 84 CHAPTER 4 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES 4.0 General 99 4.1 Land Environment 99 4.2 Water Environment 100 4.3 Air Environment 101 4.4 Noise Environnent 104 TC-2 Table of Content Draft EIA/EMP for Riverbed Mining Project of Minor Mineral in Block No.11, K-Mirhama Upstream Vishu Nalla, District-Kulgam, State-Jammu & Kashmir.
    [Show full text]
  • Andhra Pradesh
    PROFILES OF SELECTED NATIONAL PARKS AND SANCTUARIES OF INDIA JULY 2002 EDITED BY SHEKHAR SINGH ARPAN SHARMA INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION NEW DELHI CONTENTS STATE NAME OF THE PA ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR CAMPBELL BAY NATIONAL PARK ISLANDS GALATHEA NATIONAL PARK MOUNT HARRIET NATIONAL PARK NORTH BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK MIDDLE BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK SOUTH BUTTON ISLAND NATIONAL PARK RANI JHANSI MARINE NATIONAL PARK WANDOOR MARINE NATIONAL PARK CUTHBERT BAY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY GALATHEA BAY WILDLIFE SANCTUARY INGLIS OR EAST ISLAND SANCTUARY INTERVIEW ISLAND SANCTUARY LOHABARRACK OR SALTWATER CROCODILE SANCTUARY ANDHRA PRADESH ETURUNAGARAM SANCTUARY KAWAL WILDLIFE SANCTUARY KINNERSANI SANCTUARY NAGARJUNASAGAR-SRISAILAM TIGER RESERVE PAKHAL SANCTUARY PAPIKONDA SANCTUARY PRANHITA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY ASSAM MANAS NATIONAL PARK GUJARAT BANSDA NATIONAL PARK PURNA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY HARYANA NAHAR SANCTUARY KALESAR SANCTUARY CHHICHHILA LAKE SANCTUARY ABUBSHEHAR SANCTUARY BIR BARA VAN JIND SANCTUARY BIR SHIKARGAH SANCTUARY HIMACHAL PRADESH PONG LAKE SANCTUARY RUPI BHABA SANCTUARY SANGLA SANCTUARY KERALA SILENT VALLEY NATIONAL PARK ARALAM SANCTUARY CHIMMONY SANCTUARY PARAMBIKULAM SANCTUARY PEECHI VAZHANI SANCTUARY THATTEKAD BIRD SANCTUARY WAYANAD WILDLIFE SANCTUARY MEGHALAYA BALPAKARAM NATIONAL PARK SIJU WILDLIFE SANCTUARY NOKREK NATIONAL PARK NONGKHYLLEM WILDLIFE SANCTUARY MIZORAM MURLEN NATIONAL PARK PHAWNGPUI (BLUE MOUNTAIN) NATIONAL 2 PARK DAMPA WILDLIFE SANCTUARY KHAWNGLUNG WILDLIFE SANCTUARY LENGTENG WILDLIFE SANCTUARY NGENGPUI WILDLIFE
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal
    Open Journal of Forestry 2013. Vol.3, No.4, 109-114 Published Online October 2013 in SciRes (http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojf) http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojf.2013.34018 Birds of Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal Saroj Panthi1*, Sher Singh Thagunna2 1Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation, Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Baglung, Nepal 2Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation, Api-Nampa Conservation Area, Darchula, Nepal Email: *[email protected] Received June 18th, 2013; revised July 22nd, 2013; accepted August 7th, 2013 Copyright © 2013 Saroj Panthi, Sher Singh Thagunna. This is an open access article distributed under the Crea- tive Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any me- dium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nepal is rich in bird diversity and recorded 871 bird species. Our study aimed to update bird diversity of Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve (DHR) of Nepal which is an Important Birds Area (IBA) out of 27 IBAs of Nepal. One hundred forty nine species of birds were recorded in DHR; out of them Catreus wallichii was globally threatened bird which has faced different anthropogenic problem. Twelve species of birds were included in CITIES Appendices and 3 species were nationally threatened. Most of the species of order Passeriformis were recorded. Only one species of order Upupiformes i.e. Upupa epops was recorded dur- ing the study. Keywords: Bird; Checklist; Threatened; Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve Introduction Myadgi districts of Nepal (Figure 1). The reserve supports 14 ecosystems types represented in the mid hill to higher Himala- Birds (class Aves) are feathered, winged, bipedal, endother- yan ecosystem (Shrestha et al., 2002; Lillesø et al., 2005; Bhuju mic, egg-laying, vertebrate animals (Wikipedia, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Warm Temperatures During Cold Season Can Negatively Affect Adult Survival in an Alpine Bird
    Received: 28 February 2019 | Revised: 5 September 2019 | Accepted: 9 September 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5715 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Warm temperatures during cold season can negatively affect adult survival in an alpine bird Jules Chiffard1 | Anne Delestrade2,3 | Nigel Gilles Yoccoz2,4 | Anne Loison3 | Aurélien Besnard1 1Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes (EPHE), Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle Abstract et Evolutive (CEFE), UMR 5175, Centre Climate seasonality is a predominant constraint on the lifecycles of species in alpine National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), PSL Research University, and polar biomes. Assessing the response of these species to climate change thus Montpellier, France requires taking into account seasonal constraints on populations. However, interac- 2 Centre de Recherches sur les Ecosystèmes tions between seasonality, weather fluctuations, and population parameters remain d'Altitude (CREA), Observatoire du Mont Blanc, Chamonix, France poorly explored as they require long‐term studies with high sampling frequency. This 3Laboratoire d'Ecologie Alpine study investigated the influence of environmental covariates on the demography of a (LECA), CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, corvid species, the alpine chough Pyrrhocorax graculus, in the highly seasonal environ- Grenoble, France ment of the Mont Blanc region. In two steps, we estimated: (1) the seasonal survival 4 Department of Arctic and Marine of categories of individuals based on their age, sex, etc., (2) the effect of environ- Biology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway mental covariates on seasonal survival. We hypothesized that the cold season—and more specifically, the end of the cold season (spring)—would be a critical period for Correspondence Jules Chiffard, CEFE/CNRS, 1919 route de individuals, and we expected that weather and individual covariates would influence Mende, 34090 Montpellier, France.
    [Show full text]
  • Engelsk Register
    Danske navne på alverdens FUGLE ENGELSK REGISTER 1 Bearbejdning af paginering og sortering af registret er foretaget ved hjælp af Microsoft Excel, hvor det har været nødvendigt at indlede sidehenvisningerne med et bogstav og eventuelt 0 for siderne 1 til 99. Tallet efter bindestregen giver artens rækkefølge på siden.
    [Show full text]
  • SOUTHERN INDIA and SRI LANKA
    Sri Lanka Woodpigeon (all photos by D.Farrow unless otherwise stated) SOUTHERN INDIA and SRI LANKA (WITH ANDAMANS ISLANDS EXTENSION) 25 OCTOBER – 19 NOVEMBER 2016 LEADER: DAVE FARROW This years’ tour to Southern India and Sri Lanka was once again a very successful and enjoyable affair. A wonderful suite of endemics were seen, beginning with our extension to the Andaman Islands where we were able to find 20 of the 21 endemics, with Andaman Scops and Walden’s Scops Owls, Andaman and Hume’s Hawk Owls leading the way, Andaman Woodpigeon and Andaman Cuckoo Dove, good looks at 1 BirdQuest Tour Report: South India and Sri Lanka 2016 www.birdquest-tours.com Andaman Crake, plus all the others with the title ‘Andaman’ (with the exception of the Barn Owl) and a rich suite of other birds such as Ruddy Kingfisher, Oriental Pratincole, Long-toed Stint, Long-tailed Parakeets and Mangrove Whistler. In Southern India we birded our way from the Nilgiri Hills to the lowland forest of Kerala finding Painted and Jungle Bush Quail, Jungle Nightjar, White-naped and Heart-spotted Woodpeckers, Malabar Flameback, Malabar Trogons, Malabar Barbet, Blue-winged Parakeet, Grey-fronted Green Pigeons, Nilgiri Woodpigeon, Indian Pitta (with ten seen on the tour overall), Jerdon's Bushlarks, Malabar Larks, Malabar Woodshrike and Malabar Whistling Thrush, Black-headed Cuckooshrike, Black-and- Orange, Nilgiri, Brown-breasted and Rusty-tailed Flycatchers, Nilgiri and White-bellied Blue Robin, Black- chinned and Kerala Laughingthrushes, Dark-fronted Babblers, Indian Rufous Babblers, Western Crowned Warbler, Indian Yellow Tit, Indian Blackbird, Hill Swallow, Nilgiri Pipit, White-bellied Minivet, the scarce Yellow-throated and Grey-headed Bulbuls, Flame-throated and Yellow-browed Bulbuls, Nilgiri Flowerpecker, Loten's Sunbird, Black-throated Munias and the stunning endemic White-bellied Treepie.
    [Show full text]