Lazy Solution Without Proper Consultation Or a Business Case

Home , Balgowlah Heights, East Killara, Lane Cove North, North Shore (Sydney), Rodd Point

Please find below reasons why I am opposed to the privatisation of the Sydenham to Bankstown line and the proposed urban renewal as outlined in the Sydenham to Bankstown urban renewal corridor1

I live a short walk to Canterbury station and I am highly concerned about the proposed development along my closest rail corridor and in my local area. Lazy solution without proper consultation or a business case It appears to me that this proposal has been pitched to Planning NSW as an easy solution without any issues or drawbacks to future population growth. It is a solution aimed at increasing rails costs, breaking up the rail system and creating wealth for a small number of developers. I understand that this system is common in Singapore and Hong Kong. However, that does not immediately mean that it applies in Sydney and that it is the best solution to a problem that has not been clearly articulated. The Metro appears to have been a knee jerk embrace to a perceived opportunity brought by an outside interest.

I am concerned that the exact intentions of the Planning changes proposed by Planning NSW (and with the support of the private sector) for the Bankstown line are shrouded in secrecy. No business case has been released to support the Metro.2

By converting the Bankstown line, NSW is squandering windfall gains from the sale of the State’s electricity assets. As a resident on the Bankstown line and based on the information that has been presented to the public, one can reasonably conclude that the Sydney Metro, including the City & Southwest section, is not really about providing improved public transport. It is about providing development opportunities to developers, including MTR Corporation, and turning large tracts of Sydney into MTR’s version of Hong Kong.

The Metro line is being used as an excuse to push dramatic over-development on communities along the corridor. It seems spatially and geographically unequal. The push is from developers and, much of what is being built is investor driven flats built to attract the burgeoning investment market.3 This does nothing to address affordability4 or housing disadvantage. Destruction of a heritage listed suburb Ashbury and Canterbury and much of the whole Bankstown Corridor have significant heritage value that should be retained such as that of the Mary MacKillop convent5.

I am concerned about every suburb along the corridor and the impact of the plans. I have worked in Erskineville, Bankstown and Riverwood and appreciate the communities living along the whole line and those that will lose their stations or are at threat of losing their stations.

Erskineville Marrickville Campsie St Peters. Dulwich Hill Belmore Hurlstone Park Wiley Park-Lakemba

1 http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/Plans-for-your-area/Priority-Growth-Areas-and-Precincts/Sydenham-to-Bankstown- Urban-Renewal-Corridor 2 http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/secrecy-shrouds-multibilliondollar-sydney-rail-projects-20160613-gphm3g.html 3 https://theconversation.com/why-investor-driven-urban-density-is-inevitably-linked-to-disadvantage-82073 4 https://theconversation.com/housing-policy-is-captive-to-property-politics-so-dont-expect-politicians-to- tackle-affordability-55384 5 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-04-08/st-mary-mackillops-convent-faces-rezoning-proposal/8427100

Canterbury Punchbowl-Bankstown

Hurlstone Park for example has low-density character and historic homes that could be under significant threat from urban renewal plans.

Currently, nearly 60 per cent of dwellings in the suburb are separate homes. Like other suburbs on the Bankstown line, Hurlstone Park began to be developed following the completion of the railway line in the mid-1890s. This gives the area a distinctive Federation housing feel. This should be retained.

Belmore’s character will undergo dramatic change if the urban renewal plans are adopted. The change in character will be particularly apparent at Acacia and Myall Sts, which were first subdivided in 1922 as part of Redman’s Estate and are lined with single-storey character homes. These streets are proposed to be redeveloped for skyscrapers up to 25 storeys, overlooking adjacent Terry Lamb Reserve. It would seem likely the towers will destroy the ambience and peace of the reserve, which also contains Belmore Sportsground. To transition from low density to 25 stories seems a complete conflict to the idea of community integration.

The Canterbury precinct has to date already experienced significant redevelopment of its industrial areas and commercial sites along New Canterbury Rd, however residential areas have been spared significant change. There are now 1000s of new dwellings in the immediate vicinity of Canterbury station and the area is experiencing congestion, crowded street parking and long shadows from the high-rise development. Along Canterbury Road the developments go all the way to the footpath with no set back at all. The community has lost historic hotels, single story homes and now has a corridor of buildings for hundreds of metres.

Under the urban renewal plans, many hundreds of the precinct’s homes are to be demolished under the plans. Streets clustered around the now redeveloped industrial areas and village centre north of the Cooks River will see the most significant change, including current family home low-density streets such as Tincombe and Robert Streets, where streets currently containing single-storey homes are now proposed to be lined with unit blocks between 19-25 storeys high.

To put this into perspective - this is the equivalent of putting a series of skyscrapers as high as the Blues Point Tower into what are currently low-scale family home streets. It is questionable whether this level of high rise appartment development of low-density areas has previously been attempted in Sydney – even in the 1960s and 1970s.

Low-density John St, which is opposite Canterbury racecourse, will also have towers up to 18 storeys while streets to the east of the railway station will be transformed into canyons of eight-storey unit blocks. What’s more, high-density development will jump the Cooks River and transform currently untouched low-density streets in the southern part of the suburb, including streets such as Emu, Waratah and Berna Streets where five-storey unit blocks are now proposed.

Subdivision plans show these streets were first subdivided in 1889 – before the railway line was even constructed in 1895. The area at the time was listed as Silver Park. These five-storey unit blocks are also proposed in Fore St, threatening two heritage-listed homes designed by famous 19th century architect Varney Parkes. One of these homes is a State heritage-listed former convent – which was purchased by Australian’s only Catholic Saint Mary MacKillop in 1901.

Heritage and character Canterbury also has an historic cemetery, a primary school building built in the 19th Century (1879 is still inscribed on the original building) and an historic high school building. Canterbury Council prior to amalgamation has erected historic information signs around the suburb explaining its rich past as a food bowl to Sydney and the original subdivisions.

Separately, a significant number of heritage items – including State heritage items – are now under threat because they have been placed in redevelopment areas. Housing in the corridor dates back to the 1890s, when the line to Belmore was first constructed.

The corridor is also the spiritual home of the iconic War Services Home Commission scheme, which provided homes to soldiers returning home from World War I. The former Sugar Works at Canterbury, built in 1841, is a stunning State heritage item. It has been converted into housing. The proposed urban renewal plans released in October 2015 make this a high-rise site, threatening the future of the Sugar Works. Maps released in May 2016 showed that this proposal had been removed, but the site will still be surrounded by intense development undermining its setting. This is not in keeping with the intent and spirit of heritage.

Learn from West Connex Haberfield was created as a garden suburb in the early twentieth century and represented an ideal environment for people to live, work, raise and spend time with their family. The suburb has remained substantially intact but has had development through roads and Westconnex ruin its character, destroy tree canopies and divide communities. Those residents who have lost their homes cannot remain in the area due to inadequate compensation and rising housing cost. It has fragmented the community and created a landscape with a constant reminder of development at catastrophic social cost. Tree canopy is lost, heritage is lost and traffic congestion intensified.

Disruption to the social cohesion through compulsory acquisition Residents in the development corridor (including Ashbury and Canterbury) will have their houses compulsorily acquired by developers, the NSW State Government or road projects such as Westconnex6 and be forced to move from the area. Already real estate agents and developers are knocking door to door in a predatory manner pressuring people to sell.

This would be a disruption to the social cohesion that is present in the older established area. What people want is security of tenure. Ordinary people appreciate and rely on the Torrens title system as a way of feeling like they can stay somewhere and that they own their home. Westconnex has shown that this is completely undermined. The new strata title legislation7 also undermines confidence in being able to really own something or know that you can stay in your home for as long as you choose. If residents don’t have this sense of security it undermines the long-term links that are established.

As an example where I live a number of households have been away on holidays together for a weekend on a number of occasions. These activities encourage connections and people looking out

6 http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/cost-of-linking-local-roads-to-westconnex-motorway-to-hit-18-billion-20170825-gy48vk.html

7 Strata building under new legislation now only require 75% agreement for the whole building to be sold.

for each other. The constant development in the area undermines any sense that households can stay or want to stay. But where do we go? We like living here!

Make our cities liveable and productive The executive director of UN Habitat, Joan Clos, recently said:

The unprecedented confluence of climate change, population boom and the rush to live in cities means that our critical human development will take place in cities.8

If we want our cities to be the places that we want to live they have to have clean air, allow food production and generate their own clean energy. Residents are increasingly valuing that ability to grow food and to use roof top solar to make their own electricity and reduce power costs. There is no indication that the apartments and developments proposed for up to 25 stories will ever allow residents to put roof top solar on. Nor will they have to roof area big enough in ratio to generate the energy required.

The demand and supply side economic framework lacks credibility. Overdevelopment and high rise does not address affordability or disadvantage There are clear studies that indicate that high rise development that is investor led does not address either affordability or social disadvantage.

The planning proposal is underpinned by the argument that by increasing supply the rezoning of the corridor will address housing needs and housing affordability. It does at no time discuss demand for housing and acknowledge that the planning being proposed is in fact going to feed demand without alleviating either rehousing need or affordability.

If we look at the statistics from the Planning website Canterbury Bankstown has not been one of the 5 top Local government areas for additional homes.9 It is planned to be but only through sledge hammer planning laws that skew development to one area of the metropolitan area to draw away and protect other areas. [See Table 1 for a list of suburbs 15 kilometres from the CBD]

For example to single out the eastern suburbs to Maroubra and the lower north shore to Manly. Canterbury is 9.3 Kilometres from the city and 12.3 by train to the city and yet other suburbs are not bearing the development burden.

8 https://theconversation.com/the-urban-a-concept-under-stress-in-an-interconnected-world-61000

9 http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/Research-and-Demography/Sydney-housing-supply-forecast/Top-five-local-government-areas

Poorly planned and regulated housing stock is being built The apartments that have been built already around Canterbury station for example have not demonstrated any particular features that could be identified as outstanding or sustainable. The recent Grenfell building fire disaster in London points to poor building regulation and design that for high rise needs to be more rigorous perhaps than for lower level dwellings10. Admittedly that was in London but its seems this is being replicated here. See defects reference below. It’s not just the cladding but the sprinkler system, fire escapes, structural integrity, fire grade materials and internal space configuration. My observations of the stock in Canterbury indicates that;

 There are very few if any solar panels on the new developments  There appears to be very little passive ventilation on the buildings to minimise the use of air conditioning and fans  Parking in the area and buildings is already at a premium  Green space around the buildings is almost non -existant. Buidings go to the very edge of available land to the footpath of a busy road without any set back or small relief between public space and development.  Very few 3 and 4 bedroom apartments have been factored into the design minimising the possibility of families with children or group households being able to live long term in the area.  An urgency to get buildings up and sold off. There increases the risk that some developers are using shelf companies that may vanish as soon as the last flat is settled and will take no responsibility for defects11.

In Dulwich Hill a number of Boarding house developments have already been approved and constructed providing for a revolving door, temporary accommodation solution to people’s housing rather than a space that provides all services including cooking and the possibility of carers, children, companions.

Dramatic levels of character change

The level of character change proposed in the corridor are unprecedented, including the rezoning of streets of single-storey homes to allow unit blocks ranging from four to 25 storeys.

1010 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-29/grenfell-tower-review-announced-after-82-buildings-fail- tests/8755708 11 https://www.domain.com.au/news/nsw-apartment-owners-could-face-bills-for-millions-of-dollars-to- replace-unsafe-cladding-20170619-gwu6kv/

This website has been produced to bring to life and explain the impacts of the corridor-wide plan, given this issue has not been subject to public debate and attention to date. With the approval of development at the site 165 – 171 Milton Street, Ashbury to allow seven stories and possibly beyond, the unique character and of this suburb and Ashbury's Heritage Conservation Area will be destroyed. Every suburb along the corridor will be changed irrevocably and no proper consideration is being given to this. Almost no other area in Sydney will experience the level of change in such a short time as this proposal.

Lack of infrastructure and loss of employment and creative enterprises

Proposed development is currently not supported by sufficient planning for new jobs, affordable housing, infrastructure or open space. Indeed, the plan seeks to develop significant existing parcels of open space while at the same time proposing only incremental or minor additional open space acquisitions in other areas.

For instance, in its submission to the corridor strategy, the Department of Education and Communities (DEC) has raised concerns it will not be able to meet demand from the increased proposed population – even with a special development levy.

Alarmingly, DEC says in its submission that “the increased population proposed in the Sydenham to Bankstown Urban Renewal Strategy will place significant pressures on the Department to meet its legislative obligations under the Education Act 1990, particularly if there is no developer contribution to State infrastructure or…increases in budget allocations.”

The other area that is not fully explored in terms of infrastructures is small manufacturers, light industry and creative enterprises which have relied on lower rents in light industrial areas. We need to keep our high streets and industrial areas for employment and production. Most manufacturers these days are small, agile and creative. Manufacturing is increasingly interwoven with creative industries, through innovation-driven additive manufacturing, craft-based production, and bespoke maker scenes.

Cities such as New York and Portland are actively planning for this, because they recognise that the creative-manufacturing interface generates jobs, assists place marketing, contributes to liveability and enlivens local communities12.

Transport

These plans are being incorrectly justified on the basis that the Bankstown line is being replaced by a rapid-transit Metro line from 2024, with allegedly increased transport capacity. The proposed metro trains may in fact not be the best option. The notion that privatisation for the sake of privatisation always delivers the best options has not in fact been born out with real life examples. Port Macquarie Hospital is an example of that. The rail line to the domestic and international terminals has also delivered a service that is more than three times the cost of an equivalent Opal fare to the same distance. The public would expect a premium however the terminal fares are nothing less than price gouging.

12 https://theconversation.com/can-our-cities-thriving-creative-precincts-be-saved-from-renewal-83042

The wisdom of spending billions of dollars cannabilising an existing rail line is questionable, when this money could be used to create new transport capacity elsewhere. There should be investigations made into an additional rail line between the East Hills line and the Bankstown line. There may also be capacity for a new rail line from Green Square in the direction of East Gardens and Maroubra. Both those areas currently do not have a train to service connections to South East Sydney or additional capacity to South West Sydney. It is also doubtful that the single decker trains will deliver the volumes of people in comfort that it promises. The ABC Fact Check in 2012 examined this claim and found it was “doubtful”13. This was because double-decker trains have got a greater total capacity than single-decker trains and because double-decker trains can be modified to allow more efficient disembarkation.

The submission about Sydney Metro by Ecotransit14 outlines that the money spent on the Chatswood to Sydenham section of the Metro line, could be better spent on providing new public transport solutions for suburbs with limited connectivity, or improving signalling operations to speed-up the capacity of the current network, rather than cannibalising an existing line.

Open space including the racecourse at Canterbury is at a premium and should be retained for current and future generations These plans are suburban overdevelopment and are not focused on keeping the current open space or providing further open space or facilities.

Until now, the Australian Turf Club, which owns the 35-hectare racecourse, had only publicly endorsed the rezoning of 6.5 hectares of the racecourse, which it considered "surplus to the operations of the racecourse". But Mr Macri said the board had now had a "one-off opportunity" to give future club executives and members "the ability to capitalise on the asset." I am very concerned with the current discussion of including 25 story developments on the race course land. This is in contravention of the surrounding Ashbury's Heritage Conservation Area and precinct.

Open space is idenitifed in the proposed plans in schools but knowing the local schools their security will not be compromised to allow public access. [See Enclosed Lands Act] Open space will need to be truly public and not a shopping mall or a school. Natural heritage The Cooks river corridor is a valuable green space constantly under threat of development. It has wetlands, small pockets of remnant bush and is a refuge for many bird species. Overdevelopment puts pressure on all animals and birds with pollution, noise, artificial lights, rubbish, chemical release into water supplies. If we value having these quiet and green spaces close to the city then a balance must be found. The environmental impacts of this level of development has not been done and has not even found it way onto the agenda as an important consideration and that is regrettable.

An example of this is the sighting of Tawny Frogmouth owls in the local area. There are rainbow lorikeets, galahs and a range of birds.

13 http://www.abc.net.au/news/factcheck/2014-04-11/barry-ofarrell-sydney-trains-claim-doubtful/5371446

14 http://majorprojects.planning.nsw.gov.au/?action=view_submission&job_id=7400&submission_id=151221

Conclusion

Evidence would suggest the Bankstown line, and surrounding communities, are being used to provide the raw materials for a significant privatisation agenda, which involves developers taking over transport and land assets. This will be to the detriment of the existing communities and with a significant prospect of a far worse urban outcome in the future.

Recommendations 1. That the Sydenham to Bankstown line continue as a public train line integrated into the rest of the train system 2. That the development proposed in and around the precincts of the rail line referred to in the plan for renewal be abandoned. That proper community consultation be conducted taking into consideration; infrastructure health services, education services, environmental concerns, heritage, air quality, social equality, community cohesion, long term sustainability, open space, safety, natural heritage and active transport. 3. That any new privatised train lines need to be constructed underground following extensive consultation, cost benefit analysis, environmental impact assessment, long term impact assessment and exploration of all other transport options.

References

Development and affordability Nicole Gurran and Peter Phibbs 2016 https://theconversation.com/housing-policy-is-captive-to-property-politics-so-dont-expect- politicians-to-tackle-affordability-55384

Creative Precincts Chris Gibson, University of Wollongong; Alexandra Crosby, University of Technology Sydney; Carl Grodach, Queensland University of Technology; Craig Lyons, University of Wollongong; Justin O'Connor, Monash University, and Xin Gu, Monash University https://theconversation.com/can-our-cities-thriving-creative-precincts-be-saved-from-renewal- 83042

Investor-driven urban density is linked to disadvantage - August 30, 2017 Bill Randolph https://theconversation.com/why-investor-driven-urban-density-is-inevitably-linked- to-disadvantage-82073

Modelling House Prices across Sydney with Estimates for Access, Property Size, Public Transport, Urban Density and Crime – NILS Working Paper 2012 Peter Abelson, Roselyne Joyeux and Stéphane Mahuteau http://www.flinders.edu.au/sabs/nils-files/publications/working-papers/WP%20181.pdf

High-density neighbourhoods make life worse for the poor August 22, 2017 Laurence Troy, UNSW; Hazel Easthope, UNSW, and Laura Crommelin, UNSW https://theconversation.com/its-not-just-the-buildings-high-density-neighbourhoods-make-life-worse-for-the-poor-82070

Traffic congestion http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/sydney-is-congestion-capital-of-australasia-report-shows-20170104- gtlmwq.html

This is why apartment living is different for the poor – August 2017 Hazel Easthope, UNSW; Laura Crommelin, UNSW, and Laurence Troy, UNSW https://theconversation.com/its-not-just-the-buildings-high-density-neighbourhoods-make-life-worse-for-the-poor-82070

Defects – Apartment owners facing bills to replace unsafe cladding https://www.domain.com.au/news/nsw-apartment-owners-could-face-bills-for-millions-of-dollars- to-replace-unsafe-cladding-20170619-gwu6kv/

Urban Canopy cover and city development Joe Hurley, RMIT University; Ebadat Parmehr, RMIT University; Kath Phelan, RMIT University; Marco Amati, RMIT University, and Stephen Livesley, University of Melbourne https://theconversation.com/does-higher-density-city-development-leave-urban-forests-out-on-a- limb-57106

‘The urban’: a concept under stress in an interconnected world Lauren Rickards, RMIT University; Brendan Gleeson, University of Melbourne; Cian O'Callaghan, National University of Ireland Maynooth, and Mark Boyle, National University of Ireland Maynooth https://theconversation.com/the-urban-a-concept-under-stress-in-an-interconnected- world-61000

Ashbury developments and commentary http://ashburycommunity.org/the-properties/

Links http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/Plans-for-your-area/Priority-Growth-Areas-and-Precincts/Sydenham-to-Bankstown- Urban-Renewal-Corridor 1 http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/secrecy-shrouds-multibilliondollar-sydney-rail-projects-20160613-gphm3g.html 1 https://theconversation.com/why-investor-driven-urban-density-is-inevitably-linked-to-disadvantage-82073 1 https://theconversation.com/housing-policy-is-captive-to-property-politics-so-dont-expect-politicians-to- tackle-affordability-55384 1 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-04-08/st-mary-mackillops-convent-faces-rezoning-proposal/8427100 http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/cost-of-linking-local-roads-to-westconnex-motorway-to-hit-18-billion-20170825-gy48vk.html

1 Strata building under new legislation now only require 75% agreement for the whole building to be sold.

1 https://theconversation.com/the-urban-a-concept-under-stress-in-an-interconnected-world-61000

1 http://www.planning.nsw.gov.au/Research-and-Demography/Sydney-housing-supply-forecast/Top-five-local-government-areas

1 http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-07-29/grenfell-tower-review-announced-after-82-buildings-fail- tests/8755708 1 https://www.domain.com.au/news/nsw-apartment-owners-could-face-bills-for-millions-of-dollars-to- replace-unsafe-cladding-20170619-gwu6kv/ 1 https://theconversation.com/can-our-cities-thriving-creative-precincts-be-saved-from-renewal-83042 1 http://www.abc.net.au/news/factcheck/2014-04-11/barry-ofarrell-sydney-trains-claim-doubtful/5371446

1 http://majorprojects.planning.nsw.gov.au/?action=view_submission&job_id=7400&submission_id=151221

Table 1 -Illustrates suburbs less than 15 kms from the CBD. Please note in this list we have Canterbury , Campsie, Hurlstone Park, Sydenham, Wiley Park, Dulwich hill, Belmore and Lakemba. 9 suburbs out of 247 (3.6%) targeted for the Metro redevelopment. This is not to say that other suburbs are not also experiencing development but that many suburbs are not being targeted at all. Sources http://myboot.com.au/nsw/15/suburblist.aspx

Table 1

New South Wales

1. Suburb : Abbotsford (2046) 7.4 km 2. Suburb : Alexandria (2015) 3.5 km 3. Suburb : Allambie Heights (2100) 12 km 4. Suburb : Allawah (2218) 14.3 km 5. Suburb : Annandale (2038) 3.7 km 6. Suburb : Arncliffe (2205) 9.5 km 7. Suburb : Artarmon (2064) 6.7 km 8. Suburb : Ashbury (2193) 9 km 9. Suburb : Ashfield (2131) 7.9 km 10. Suburb : Balgowlah (2093) 9.6 km 11. Suburb : Balgowlah Heights (2093) 8.7 km 12. Suburb : Balmain (2041) 2.9 km 13. Suburb : Balmain East (2041) 1.8 km 14. Suburb : Banksia (2216) 10.7 km 15. Suburb : Banksmeadow (2019) 10 km 16. Suburb : Bardwell Park (2207) 10.4 km 17. Suburb : Bardwell Valley (2207) 10.1 km 18. Suburb : Beacon Hill (2100) 13.7 km 19. Suburb : Beaconsfield (2015) 5 km 20. Suburb : Belfield (2191) 12 km 21. Suburb : Bellevue Hill (2023) 5.3 km 22. Suburb : Belmore (2192) 12.3 km 23. Suburb : Belrose (2085) 14.2 km 24. Suburb : Beverley Park (2217) 13.9 km 25. Suburb : Beverly Hills (2209) 14.7 km 26. Suburb : Bexley (2207) 11.7 km 27. Suburb : Bexley North (2207) 11.7 km 28. Suburb : Birchgrove (2041) 2.9 km 29. Suburb : Blenheim Road (2113) 10.2 km 30. Suburb : Bondi (2026) 5.9 km 31. Suburb : Bondi Beach (2026) 6.8 km 32. Suburb : Bondi Junction (2022) 4.7 km 33. Suburb : Bondi Junction Plaza (2022) 4.8 km 34. Suburb : Botany (2019) 8.7 km 35. Suburb : Breakfast Point (2137) 9.6 km 36. Suburb : Brighton-le-sands (2216) 11.4 km 37. Suburb : Bronte (2024) 6.5 km 38. Suburb : Brookvale (2100) 12.8 km 39. Suburb : Burwood (2134) 9.6 km 40. Suburb : Burwood Heights (2136) 9.9 km 41. Suburb : Cabarita (2137) 8.9 km 42. Suburb : Cammeray (2062) 5 km 43. Suburb : Camperdown (2050) 3.6 km 44. Suburb : Campsie (2194) 10.7 km 45. Suburb : Canada Bay (2046) 8.4 km 46. Suburb : Canterbury (2193) 9.3 km 47. Suburb : Carlton (2218) 13.6 km 48. Suburb : Castle Cove (2069) 9.2 km 49. Suburb : Castlecrag (2068) 7.2 km 50. Suburb : Centennial Park (2021) 3.8 km 51. Suburb : Chatswood (2067) 8.2 km

52. Suburb : Chatswood West (2067) 8.7 km 53. Suburb : Chifley (2036) 12.5 km 54. Suburb : Chippendale (2008) 2.2 km 55. Suburb : Chiswick (2046) 6.8 km 56. Suburb : Chullora (2190) 14.2 km 57. Suburb : Clemton Park (2206) 11.6 km 58. Suburb : Clontarf (2093) 7.9 km 59. Suburb : Clovelly (2031) 7.2 km 60. Suburb : Concord (2137) 9.6 km 61. Suburb : Concord West (2138) 11.3 km 62. Suburb : Coogee (2034) 7.4 km 63. Suburb : Cremorne (2090) 4.8 km 64. Suburb : Cremorne Point (2090) 3.2 km 65. Suburb : Crows Nest (2065) 4.6 km 66. Suburb : Croydon (2132) 8.7 km 67. Suburb : Croydon Park (2133) 9.6 km 68. Suburb : Curl Curl (2096) 13.6 km 69. Suburb : Daceyville (2032) 7 km 70. Suburb : Darling Point (2027) 2.8 km 71. Suburb : Darlinghurst (2010) 1.8 km 72. Suburb : Darlington (2008) 3.1 km 73. Suburb : Davidson (2085) 14.3 km 74. Suburb : Dawes Point (2000) 1.3 km 75. Suburb : Dee Why (2099) 14.6 km 76. Suburb : Denistone (2114) 14 km 77. Suburb : Denistone East (2112) 12.8 km 78. Suburb : Denistone West (2114) 14.1 km 79. Suburb : Double Bay (2028) 3.6 km 80. Suburb : Dover Heights (2030) 6.8 km 81. Suburb : Drummoyne (2047) 5.2 km 82. Suburb : Dulwich Hill (2203) 7.2 km 83. Suburb : Earlwood (2206) 9.9 km 84. Suburb : East Killara (2071) 13.1 km 85. Suburb : East Lindfield (2070) 11.4 km 86. Suburb : East Ryde (2113) 8.6 km 87. Suburb : Eastgardens (2036) 8.9 km 88. Suburb : Eastlakes (2018) 6.5 km 89. Suburb : Eastwood (2122) 14.5 km 90. Suburb : Edgecliff (2027) 2.9 km 91. Suburb : Elizabeth Bay (2011) 1.9 km 92. Suburb : Enfield (2136) 10.8 km 93. Suburb : Enmore (2042) 4.9 km 94. Suburb : Erskineville (2043) 4.2 km 95. Suburb : Eurimbla (2867) 6.4 km 96. Suburb : Eveleigh (2015) 3.6 km 97. Suburb : Fairlight (2094) 9.8 km 98. Suburb : Five Dock (2046) 7.1 km 99. Suburb : Forest Lodge (2037) 2.9 km 100. Suburb : Forestville (2087) 11.7 km 101. Suburb : Frenchs Forest (2086) 13 km 102. Suburb : Frenchs Forest East (2086) 13.3 km 103. Suburb : Gladesville (2111) 8.1 km 104. Suburb : Glebe (2037) 2.3 km 105. Suburb : Gordon (2072) 13.4 km 106. Suburb : Greenacre (2190) 14.5 km 107. Suburb : Greenwich (2065) 4.4 km 108. Suburb : Haberfield (2045) 6.5 km 109. Suburb : Harbord (2096) 12.2 km 110. Suburb : Haymarket (2000) 1.6 km 111. Suburb : Henley (2111) 7.1 km 112. Suburb : Hillsdale (2036) 9.8 km 113. Suburb : Hmas Kuttabul (2011) 1.7 km

114. Suburb : Hmas Rushcutters (2027) 2.7 km 115. Suburb : Hmas Waterhen (2060) 3.2 km 116. Suburb : Hmas Watson (2030) 7.6 km 117. Suburb : Homebush (2140) 11.6 km 118. Suburb : Homebush Bay (2127) 12.2 km 119. Suburb : Homebush West (2140) 12.7 km 120. Suburb : Hunters Hill (2110) 6.3 km 121. Suburb : Huntleys Cove (2111) 6.5 km 122. Suburb : Huntleys Point (2111) 6.4 km 123. Suburb : Hurlstone Park (2193) 8.4 km 124. Suburb : Hurstville (2220) 14.7 km 125. Suburb : Kensington (2033) 4.9 km 126. Suburb : Killara (2071) 12 km 127. Suburb : Killarney Heights (2087) 10.4 km 128. Suburb : Kingsford (2032) 6.7 km 129. Suburb : Kingsgrove (2208) 12.8 km 130. Suburb : Kirribilli (2061) 2.4 km 131. Suburb : Kogarah (2217) 12.7 km 132. Suburb : Kogarah Bay (2217) 14.7 km 133. Suburb : Kyeemagh (2216) 10.3 km 134. Suburb : La Perouse (2036) 13.8 km 135. Suburb : Lakemba (2195) 13.5 km 136. Suburb : Lane Cove (2066) 6.8 km 137. Suburb : Lane Cove North (2066) 7.4 km 138. Suburb : Lane Cove West (2066) 8.4 km 139. Suburb : Lavender Bay (2060) 2.7 km 140. Suburb : Leichhardt (2040) 5 km 141. Suburb : Lewisham (2049) 6.6 km 142. Suburb : Liberty Grove (2138) 11.8 km 143. Suburb : Lilyfield (2040) 3.9 km 144. Suburb : Lindfield (2070) 10.7 km 145. Suburb : Linley Point (2066) 7 km 146. Suburb : Little Bay (2036) 13.1 km 147. Suburb : Longueville (2066) 5.4 km 148. Suburb : Macquarie Park (2113) 11.8 km 149. Suburb : Malabar (2036) 11.5 km 150. Suburb : Manly (2095) 10.8 km 151. Suburb : Manly Vale (2093) 10.8 km 152. Suburb : Maroubra (2035) 9.4 km 153. Suburb : Marrickville (2204) 6.7 km 154. Suburb : Marsfield (2122) 13.9 km 155. Suburb : Mascot (2020) 7.2 km 156. Suburb : Matraville (2036) 10.3 km 157. Suburb : Mcmahons Point (2060) 2.5 km 158. Suburb : Meadowbank (2114) 12.2 km 159. Suburb : Melrose Park (2114) 13.3 km 160. Suburb : Middle Cove (2068) 8.1 km 161. Suburb : Millers Point (2000) 1 km 162. Suburb : Milsons Point (2061) 2.2 km 163. Suburb : Monterey (2217) 12.9 km 164. Suburb : Moore Park (2021) 3.2 km 165. Suburb : Mortlake (2137) 9.6 km 166. Suburb : Mosman (2088) 5.4 km 167. Suburb : Naremburn (2065) 5.6 km 168. Suburb : Narraweena (2099) 14.5 km 169. Suburb : Neutral Bay (2089) 4.2 km 170. Suburb : Newington (2127) 14.4 km 171. Suburb : Newtown (2042) 4.1 km 172. Suburb : North Balgowlah (2093) 9.8 km 173. Suburb : North Bondi (2026) 7 km 174. Suburb : North Curl Curl (2099) 14.3 km 175. Suburb : North Manly (2100) 11.7 km

176. Suburb : North Ryde (2113) 10.9 km 177. Suburb : North Strathfield (2137) 10.7 km 178. Suburb : North Sydney (2060) 3.2 km 179. Suburb : North Sydney (2055) 11.8 km 180. Suburb : North Willoughby (2068) 8.3 km 181. Suburb : Northbridge (2063) 6.3 km 182. Suburb : Northwood (2066) 5 km 183. Suburb : Paddington (2021) 2.7 km 184. Suburb : Pagewood (2035) 8.3 km 185. Suburb : Petersham (2049) 5.9 km 186. Suburb : Phillip Bay (2036) 12.9 km 187. Suburb : Point Piper (2027) 4.2 km 188. Suburb : Port Botany (2036) 11.1 km 189. Suburb : Potts Point (2011) 1.7 km 190. Suburb : Putney (2112) 9.9 km 191. Suburb : Pymble (2073) 15 km 192. Suburb : Pyrmont (2009) 1.3 km 193. Suburb : Queens Park (2022) 5.5 km 194. Suburb : Queenscliff (2096) 11.8 km 195. Suburb : Ramsgate (2217) 14.5 km 196. Suburb : Ramsgate Beach (2217) 13.8 km 197. Suburb : Randwick (2031) 6 km 198. Suburb : Redfern (2016) 2.9 km 199. Suburb : Rhodes (2138) 11.7 km 200. Suburb : Riverview (2066) 6.4 km 201. Suburb : Rockdale (2216) 11.5 km 202. Suburb : Rodd Point (2046) 6 km 203. Suburb : Rookwood (2141) 13.8 km 204. Suburb : Rose Bay (2029) 5.7 km 205. Suburb : Rosebery (2018) 5.9 km 206. Suburb : Roselands (2196) 14.4 km 207. Suburb : Roseville (2069) 9.6 km 208. Suburb : Roseville Chase (2069) 9.9 km 209. Suburb : Royal North Shore Hospital (2065) 5.3 km 210. Suburb : Rozelle (2039) 3.4 km 211. Suburb : Rushcutters Bay (2011) 2.2 km 212. Suburb : Russell Lea (2046) 6.2 km 213. Suburb : Ryde (2112) 11.2 km 214. Suburb : Seaforth (2092) 8.8 km 215. Suburb : South Coogee (2034) 8.4 km 216. Suburb : St Leonards (2065) 5 km 217. Suburb : St Peters (2044) 5.5 km 218. Suburb : Stanmore (2048) 5.1 km 219. Suburb : Strathfield (2135) 10.5 km 220. Suburb : Strathfield South (2136) 11.8 km 221. Suburb : Summer Hill (2130) 7 km 222. Suburb : Surry Hills (2010) 2.5 km 223. Suburb : Sydenham (2044) 6.6 km 224. Suburb : Tamarama (2026) 6.9 km 225. Suburb : Tempe (2044) 7.7 km 226. Suburb : Tennyson Point (2111) 9.2 km 227. Suburb : The Rocks (2000) 0.9 km 228. Suburb : The University Of Sydney (2006) 3 km 229. Suburb : Turrella (2205) 9.3 km 230. Suburb : Ultimo (2007) 1.5 km 231. Suburb : Vaucluse (2030) 6.6 km 232. Suburb : Wareemba (2046) 7.1 km 233. Suburb : Waterloo (2017) 3.7 km 234. Suburb : Watsons Bay (2030) 7.4 km 235. Suburb : Waverley (2024) 5.4 km 236. Suburb : Waverton (2060) 3.2 km 237. Suburb : West Pymble (2073) 14 km

238. Suburb : West Ryde (2114) 12.8 km 239. Suburb : Wiley Park (2195) 14.2 km 240. Suburb : Willoughby (2068) 7.3 km 241. Suburb : Willoughby East (2068) 7.2 km 242. Suburb : Wolli Creek (2205) 8.5 km 243. Suburb : Wollstonecraft (2065) 4.4 km 244. Suburb : Woollahra (2025) 3.6 km 245. Suburb : Woolloomooloo (2011) 1.3 km 246. Suburb : Woolwich (2110) 4.5 km 247. Suburb : Zetland (2017) 4.8 km

Home |