DOCSLIB.ORG

Learning Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Learning Brief Learning Brief LEARNING BRIEF “Pakada and tutya”: Gaining the Indigenous Communities’ Consent for Project Implementation Key Messages It is tradition in the Cordilleras or among Indigenous Peoples’ (IPs) that before entering into any territory, pakada” andone mustto leave: seek Pakada” first the in consent Kankana-ey of the (Besao, community. Sagada It • Introducing a project is called “ which means“pakacha” permission to enter to the ICC needs pakaja” andpakada” Sadanga, Mt. Province), in Bontoc, Mt. understanding, Province, “ in Tubo, Abra. Although the word transparency, respect tradition“ ofis deriveddeliberating from whether the Ilocano to approve dialect, itor was deny and perseverance. The practiced by the IPs of Cordillera combined with their culture, tradition and beliefs of the community Tutyathe request is usually to enter done their in their community dap-ays/ators/atos which they call as must be considered “tutya” in Kankana-ey term used in Sagada and Besao. when introducing a which project. Approval of keyrefer players to an indigenous to administer open the meeting agreements place related made of to the stone slabs where bonfire is usually set at its center. The project by the community pakada” tutya” represented by the different dap-ays (Tubo, Sagada and is in accordance with “ and “ are the Council of Elders (COEs) their customary laws and experiences. Their Besao), ators (Sadanga) and atos (Mainit, Bontoc). experiences include the historical struggles This traditional approach was consciously followed by the project in gaining the consent of the indigenous of the community communities of Abra and Mountain Province for its involving ownership and mountains:SIKAME-IWMP Sisipitan, initiative. Kaman-ingel The proposed and Mengmeng watershed management of natural protection plan was named after the three major resources within their ancestral domain claims. (SIKAME) situated in the boundaries of Abra and Mountain Province. Objectively, the implementation of the watershed protection plan becomes the responsibility of the different tribes within the project site. The Project has identified the provincial boundaries of Mountain Province and Abra as the appropriate areas for the establishment of model learning site because it contains the biggest area of water source that supplies the Project’s largest population/beneficiaries. The SIKAME-IWMP specifically aims to prepare watershed plan to protect, sustain, safeguard and enhance the common natural resources in the watershed areas of Mountain Province and Abra; document the indigenous forest management practices of the IPs in the proposed inter- tribal watershed management plan, identify the common watershed areas and come up with a common plan to protect, sustain and enhance the SIKAME ecosystem. Gueday, Ambagiw and Tamboan of Besao, Aguid, Pide, Fidelisan, The plan/project covers 18 barangays namely, Lacmaan, Agawa, Madongo, Tanulong, and Bangaan of Sagada, Mainit of Bontoc, Belwang of Sadanga for Mountain Province and Kili, Tabacda, Tiempo, Alangtin, and Tubtuba of Tubo for Abra Province. The proposed watershed plan covers a total land area of approximately 44,604.96 hectares within 9 sub-watersheds. In the conduct of the initiative, the Project conducted the Free and Prior Information Consent or FPIC in coordination with the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP). The FPIC principle generally requires that communities must be adequately informed about development projects in a timely manner and should be given the opportunity to approve or reject these projects free from undue pressure as stated in the FPIC legal framework of the RA. 8371 (IPRA Law). The consent and approval of all the tribes involved in the SIKAME watershed is important because the main objective of the proposed plan is for all the tribes to co-manage, protect, and preserve the SIKAME natural resources. The Tribes at the very start had many reasons and fears that blocked a unanimous consent resulting to the non-approval of the SIKAME-IWMP. To understand their views, the Project conducted a series of “tutya”. 2 Experiences and Reflections Seeking approval of the ICCs for the issuance Consent seeking as an iterative process: of Certification Precondition of the proposed The case of Northern Sagada project through pakada and tutya The Tribes at the very start had many reasons and The certification precondition states that free, fears that blocked a unanimous consent resulting prior and informed consent (FPIC) has been to the non-approval of the SIKAME-IWMP. To obtained from the concerned IPs. When the understand their views, the Project conducted pakada was already granted or the consent of the a series of tutya. On those occasions, the team community is obtained, the terms and conditions presented all possibilities, opportunities, and agreed upon shall be stated in a memorandum potentials of the watershed protection plan. It was of agreement to be executed between and among reiterated that once approved and materialized, the ICC/IPs (represented by elders who have been the Project will be implemented by all the ICCs identified during the validation and authorized by within the SIKAME area as co-tribal management. the community to sign). A series of “tutya” were But still, some elders were not yet satisfied conducted in all covered barangays. with the concept of the proposed plan. Thus, In the case of Tubo, Abra and Belwang, Sadanga, they requested to have another tutya and more the pakada and tutya was conducted once per information education communication campaign domain, and thrice for Besao, Mountain Province for them to fully understand the whole concept of for they have immediately understood the main the proposed plan. The request was again granted concept, objectives and goals of the proposed by the Project. However, during the course of project. The three ICCs immediately granted tutya, the elders refused consent again claiming approval and consent, and Memorandum of that it will bring negative effect to the community Agreements were signed. On February 2019, the and that they cannot afford to manage other tribes CP for the three Municipalities (per ancestral entering in their boundaries because it might domain) were issued by the NCIP. Meanwhile, cause tribal conflict in the future. Additionally, it took long for Northern Sagada and Mainit, there were some negative elements affecting their Bontoc, to give their approval and consent consciousness that leads them to misunderstood even after the Project conducted series of tutya the project concept, and experienced on past with them. Thus, requested for more tutya and unsuccessful projects like similar research were information education communication (IEC) conducted in the ili without full disclosure of the campaigns. final result. Northern Sagada elders forwarded a letter of resolution stating their refusal to the proposed Formulation of Technical Working Group to plan and excluding Mount Sisipitan in the help achieve project objectives SIKAME plan. As a response, the Project sought A Technical Working Group (TWG) composed help from the MLGU and Municipal TWG A Technical Working Group (TWG) composed Members. of project staff, provincial and municipal local The Local Chief Executive then convened the government units, partner agencies from NCIP, barangay chairpersons of the six Barangays in DENR, DILG, and NEDA, and COEs from the 18 northern Sagada together with the Project staff Barangays were organized to work as the team to and NCIP in his office to discuss the Resolution of provide technical assistance in the formulation Rejection to the SIKAME Project. The Barangay of the SIKAME-IWMP. On the other hand, the officials were enlightened and agreed to continue identified COEs as tribe representatives will help the SIKAME Project after the meeting. They in the formulation of the policies in support to the claimed that the Resolution was not discussed plan. COEs as representative in the TWG will also to them properly and was not even agreed upon help explain the aim and purpose of the SIKAME- IWMP in their respective community. 3 Experiences and Reflections by majority of the community members. The Barangay Chairpersons then promised to coordinate the conduct of community consultation and to pursue for the approval of the concerned ICCs on the said project. They also suggested for more conducive venue for they believed that it might be the venue or ambiance that resulted to the previous disapprovals. The third “tutya” was then conducted at the Bangaan National High School (BNHS) grounds. After all the explanations, Students of the Bangaan National clarifications and discussions among the SagadaHigh Schoolregarding participated for the ‘pamakada’ in the “tutya” being members of the TWGs and other community conducted by the Project and MLGU- members, the plan was not yet been approved by the attending participants for they claimed sought for the SIKAME-IWMP initiative. that they still do not understand its objectives and they wanted more precise and deeper explanations on its main concepts and goals. They also claimed that it is untimely for the project to enter their community for they claimed that they can manage to conserve their watershed for it was already protected since time immemorial. They requested for another tutya. The Project staff, TWG members and service providers agreed to conduct the last and final “tutya” among community and the proponents in the pursuit of the approval of the SIKAME Project. However, it was also decided that if (above) and after the final “tutya” and the community will not give their approval, the NCIP will take (below)Project Manager Cameron P. Odsey action based on the FPIC procedure. Agroforestry Watershed Management Coordinator The last “pakada” through a tutya was better understanding, together with of MLGU-Sagada, took turns conducted in the Mission ground of Bangaan, in explaining the concept of the SIKAME-IWMP for Sagada and with the full support and the community people. participation of the Vice Mayor, he also called the attention of the high school Students of BNHS to attend and participate stating that the participation will raise awareness about the concern among the youth.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POPCEN Report No. 3.Pdf
    CITATION: Philippine Statistics Authority, 2015 Census of Population, Report No. 3 – Population, Land Area, and Population Density ISSN 0117-1453 ISSN 0117-1453 REPORT NO. 3 22001155 CCeennssuuss ooff PPooppuullaattiioonn PPooppuullaattiioonn,, LLaanndd AArreeaa,, aanndd PPooppuullaattiioonn DDeennssiittyy Republic of the Philippines Philippine Statistics Authority Quezon City REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES HIS EXCELLENCY PRESIDENT RODRIGO R. DUTERTE PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY BOARD Honorable Ernesto M. Pernia Chairperson PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY Lisa Grace S. Bersales, Ph.D. National Statistician Josie B. Perez Deputy National Statistician Censuses and Technical Coordination Office Minerva Eloisa P. Esquivias Assistant National Statistician National Censuses Service ISSN 0117-1453 FOREWORD The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) conducted the 2015 Census of Population (POPCEN 2015) in August 2015 primarily to update the country’s population and its demographic characteristics, such as the size, composition, and geographic distribution. Report No. 3 – Population, Land Area, and Population Density is among the series of publications that present the results of the POPCEN 2015. This publication provides information on the population size, land area, and population density by region, province, highly urbanized city, and city/municipality based on the data from population census conducted by the PSA in the years 2000, 2010, and 2015; and data on land area by city/municipality as of December 2013 that was provided by the Land Management Bureau (LMB) of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Also presented in this report is the percent change in the population density over the three census years. The population density shows the relationship of the population to the size of land where the population resides.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.5.4.2 Final Report of Kankana-Ey Besao Size
    Ethnomedical documentation of selected Philippine ethnolinguistic groups: the Busaos Kankana-ey people of Barangay Catengan, Besao, Mountain Province A collaborative project of Philippine Institute of Traditional and Alternative Health Care, Department of Health, Sta Cruz, Manila University of the Philippines Manila, Ermita, Manila 2000 August Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We wish to thank the Provincial Health Office of Mountain Province for the assistance and suggestions given during the initial phase of the study, and Dr Penelope Domogo for the suggestions and referrals on the study sites. We also thank the people of Besao especially Hon Johnson N Bantog for the permission to conduct the study in his locality, and Ms Joyce Callisen for the guidance and help in the coordination in the study site. And lastly, we would like to give our deepest thanks to the people of Brgy Catengan, Brgy Captain Dondie Babake for allowing us to conduct our study in their community, the family of Mrs Vergie Sagampod for the warm acceptance and accommodation given the researcher during the study period, and the healers, mothers, youth members and children for the information that they shared. Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive summary Background of the study Objectives Methodology Review of literature Results Recommendations References Appendices Page 3 Ethnomedical documentation of selected Philippine ethnolinguistic groups: the Busaos Kankana-ey people of Besao, Mountain Province EXECUTIVE SUMMARY An ethnomedical documentation of the Busaos people in Mountain Province was conducted in March to July 2000. The five-month study focused on the indigenous healers present in the community. The study included the documentation of the health perceptions, beliefs and practices of the Busaos, including the ethnopharmacological knowledge of the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Lo Fil) 2Ozo by and Between
    * Contract ID 20Proo41 Contract Name Convergence and Specia! Support Program - Construction/ Improvement of Access Roads leading to Declared Tourism Destinations, Tadian-sagada Via Besao Road leading to Tirad Pass View, Fidelisan Falls, Sumaguing Cave, Balangagan Cave, Ayyuweng di lambak ed Tadian Festival, Kiltepan Sunrise, Besao Sunset Hanging Coffins, Echo Valley, Tadian, Mountain Province Location of the .Tadian, Mountain Province Contract CONTRACT AGREEMENT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: This CONTRACT AGREEMENT, made this lo fil) 2ozo by and between: The GOVERNMENT irr THE REPUBLTC OF THE PHILTPPTNES through the Department of Public Works and Highways-Mountain Province First District Engineering Office (DPWH-MPFDEO) represented herein by ALEXANDER C. CASTAfrEDA, District Engineer, duly authorized for this purpose, with main office address at Lower Caluttit, Bontoc, Mountain Province, hereinafter referred to as the "PROCURING ENTITY"; GENERAL CONSTRUCTION, a single proprietorship organized and existing and by virtue of laws of the Republic of the Philippines, with main office address at POBLACION, TADIAN, MOUNTAIN PROVINCE, represented herein by REYNALDO S. DEL AMOR, duly authorized for this purpose, hereinafter referred to as the *CONTRACTOR; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the PROCURING ENTITY is desirous that the CONTRACTOR execute the Works under 20PI0041 - Convergence and Special Support Program Construction/ Improvement of Access Roads leading to Declared Tourism Destinations, Tadian-Sagada via Besao Road leading to Tirad Pass View, 6
    [Show full text]
  • 2278-6236 Inayan: the Tenet for Peace Among Igorots
    International Journal of Advanced Research in ISSN: 2278-6236 Management and Social Sciences Impact Factor: 6.284 INAYAN: THE TENET FOR PEACE AMONG IGOROTS Rhonda Vail G. Leyaley* Abstract: This research study was conducted to determine the meaning of Inayan and how this principle is used by the Igorots as a peaceful means of solving issues that involves untoward killings, accidents, theft and land grabbing. The descriptive method was used in this study. Key informants were interviewed using a prepared questionnaire. Foremost, the meaning of Inayan among Igorots is, it is the summary of the Ten Commandments. For more peaceful means, they’d rather do the rituals like the “Daw-es” to appease their pain and anger. This is letting the Supreme Being which they call Kabunyan take the course of action in “punishing” those who have committed wrong towards them. It is recommended that the principles of Inayan be disseminated to the younger generation through the curriculum; that the practices and rituals will be fully documented to be used as references; and to develop instructional materials that will advocate the principle of Inayan; Keywords: Inayan, Peace, Igorots, Rituals, Kankanaey *Bulanao, Tabuk City, Kalinga Vol. 5 | No. 2 | February 2016 www.garph.co.uk IJARMSS | 239 International Journal of Advanced Research in ISSN: 2278-6236 Management and Social Sciences Impact Factor: 6.284 I. INTRODUCTION In a society where tribal conflicts are very evident, a group of individuals has a very distinguishable practice in maintaining the culture of peace among themselves. They are the Igorots. The Cordillera region of Northern Philippines is the ancestral domain of the Igorots.
    [Show full text]
  • Quintin Paredes 1884–1973
    H former members 1900–1946 H Quintin Paredes 1884–1973 RESIDENT COMMISSIONER 1935–1938 NACIONALISTA FROM THE PHILIPPINES s the first Resident Commissioner to represent eventually moved to Manila and studied law under the the Philippines after it became a commonwealth direction of another of his brothers, Isidro. He worked during of the United States, Quintin Paredes worked the day, studied at night, and after passing the bar exam, toA revise the economic relationship between his native Paredes briefly took a job with the Filipino government in archipelago and the mainland. Paredes championed Manila before moving to the private sector.4 Paredes married Philippine independence, constantly reminding policymakers Victoria Peralta, and the couple had 10 children.5 of his home’s history as a valuable and vital trading partner. In 1908 Paredes joined the solicitor general’s office In testimony before congressional committees and in in Manila as a prosecuting attorney and rapidly rose to speeches on the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives, the solicitor general post in 1917. The very next year, Paredes countered common misconceptions about Filipinos Paredes accepted the job as attorney general, becoming and worked to place the islands on stable economic footing as the Philippines’ top lawyer. Within two years, he became they moved toward independence. secretary of justice in the cabinet of Governor General One of 10 children, Quintin Paredes was born in the Francis Burton Harrison, a former Member of the U.S. northwestern town of Bangued, in the Philippines’ Abra House of Representatives from New York. President Province, on September 9, 1884, to Juan Felix and Regina Woodrow Wilson nominated Paredes to serve as an Babila Paredes.
    [Show full text]
  • BSP Holdings 2012 Production ABRA APAYAO BENGUET SAFETY
    Mineral Production III. Exports Environmental Protection and Enhancement Program A. Metallic Quantity Value (PhP) Commodity/ Quantity Value (PhP) Value (US$) AEPEP Commitment Gold (Kg) 3,400.69 8,326,807,058.00 Destination Company 2012 Commitment Silver (Kg) 3,680.31 97,288,217.00 A. Gold (kg) 3,080.64 6,998,402,339 412,991,653 (PhP) Copper (DMT) 40,532.00 3,802,572,437.00 China, Japan, Philex Mining Corporation 261,213,336.00 7,482.13 7,398,440.00 London, Canada, SSM-Gold (gms) Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company 106,250,000.00 B. Non-Metallic Switzerland ML Carantes Devt. & Gen. Const. Entp. 308,154.00 Quicklime (MT) 8,884.71 63,616,454.14 B. Silver (kg) 3,660.40 215,133,289.40 10,980,778 Slakelime (MT) 461.11 2,377,603.85 China, Japan, Mountain Rock Aggregates 440,500.00 London, Canada, I. Large Scale Metallic Non-Metallic BC-BAGO 2,111,000.00 Mining Switzerland A. Number of 3 1 C. Copper (DMT) 40,136 3,426,102,554 60,400,939 BC-ACMP 4,802,000.00 Producers Japan Itogon Suyoc Resources, Inc. 1,385,310.00 B. Total Area 1,637.0800 19.09 IV. Sand & Gravel TOTAL 376,113,850.00 Covered (Has.) Province ABRA APAYAO BENGUET C. Employment 4,953 Males 406 Females A. Quantity Produced 35,191 250,318 66,553 D. Local Sales (PhP) (cu.m.) Gold (Kg) 194.52 437,814,493.00 B. Value (PhP) 1,294,911 100,127,312 12,235,927 SAFETY STATISTICS January-December 2012 SSM-Gold (gms) 7,705.13 7,875,105.00 C.
    [Show full text]
  • List of KALAHI-CIDSS Subprojects - MAKILAHOK As of February 01, 2019
    List of KALAHI-CIDSS Subprojects - MAKILAHOK as of February 01, 2019 Estimated Physical Date of Region Province Municipality Barangay Sub-Project Name Project Type KC Grant LCC Amount Total Project No. Of HHsDate Started Accomplishme Status Completion Cost nt (%) CAR [Cordillera Administrative Region]MOUNTAIN PROVINCE SADANGA ANABEL Construction of One Unit One School Building 1,181,886.33 347,000.00 1,528,886.33 / / Not yet started Storey Elementary School Building CAR [Cordillera Administrative Region]MOUNTAIN PROVINCE SADANGA BEKIGAN Construction of Sumang-Paitan Water System 1,061,424.62 300,044.00 1,361,468.62 / / Not yet started Village Water System CAR [Cordillera Administrative Region]MOUNTAIN PROVINCE SADANGA BELWANG Construction of Pikchat- Water System 471,920.92 353,000.00 824,920.92 / / Not yet started Pattiging Village Water System CAR [Cordillera Administrative Region]MOUNTAIN PROVINCE SADANGA SACASACAN Rehabilitation of Penged Maballi- Water System 312,366.54 845,480.31 1,157,846.85 / / Not yet started Sacasshak Village Water Supply System CAR [Cordillera Administrative Region]MOUNTAIN PROVINCE SADANGA SACLIT Improvement of Wetig- Footpath / Foot Trail / Access Trail 931,951.59 931,951.59 / / Not yet started Takchangan Footpath (may include box culvert/drainage as a component for Footpath) CAR [Cordillera Administrative Region]IFUGAO TINOC AHIN Construction of 5m x 1000m Road (may include box 251,432.73 981,708.84 1,233,141.57 / / Not yet started FMR Along Telep-Awa-Buo culvert/drainage as a component for Section road)
    [Show full text]
  • Municipal Government of Sadanga, Mountain Province
    MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT OF SADANGA, MOUNTAIN PROVINCE CITIZEN’S CHARTER 2020 (1st Edition) I. MANDATE: Deriving its mandate from the Local Government Code of 1991, also known as RA 7160, the mission to follow the people’s welfare under Section 16 of the Code, to wit: General Welfare: Every LGU shall exercise the powers expressly granted, those necessarily implied therefrom, as well as powers, necessary, appropriate, or incidental for its efficient and effective governance and those which are essential to the promotion of the general welfare within their respective territorial jurisdictions. LGU shall ensure and support among other things, the preservation and enrichment of culture, promote health and safety, enhance the right of the people to a balance ecology, encourage and support the development of appropriate and self-reliant, scientific and technological capabilities, improve public morals, enhance economic prosperity and social justice, promote full employment among their residents, maintain peace and order, and preserve the comfort and convenience of the inhabitant. II. VISION: “ADAYSA NA SADANGA” Dream paradise in the Gran Cordillera that is adaptive, resilient and vibrant community with politically matured, culturally enriched, peace loving, spiritually, strengthened, healthy and child friendly people enjoying a robust economy in a safe and sustainable environment, led by committed and proactive leaders in a participatory and collective governance. III. MISSION: Lead the people to be at pace with the changing times by pursuing equitable socio-economic growth, optimizing resources, improving the quality and delivery of basic services and prudently putting in place relevant infrastructures and socio- economic activities yet keeping intact the locality’s natural endowments and ecological balance while promoting peace and enhancing our indigenous cultural heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Gr 212564 2015.Pdf
    ' .. •' ~ l\epublit- of tbe l)lJtlipptnes &upreme teourt ;llanila TIDRD DIVISION NOTICE · Sirs/Mesdames: Please take notice that the Court, Third Division, issued a Resolution dated. March 18, 2015, which reads as follows: G.R. No. 212564 (People of the Philippines vs. Fermin Cawaren y Chakiwag alias "Aray'?. - This is an appeal from the Decision1 dated November 29, 2013 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CR-HC No. 05472 which affirmed with modification the Judgment2 dated January 26, 2012 of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Bontoc, Mountain Province, Branch 35, in Criminal Case No. 2010-12-16-88. The RTC convicted Fermin Cawaren y Chakiwag alias "Aray" (Cawaren) of the crime of Murder and sentenced him to s4ffer reclusion perpetua without pronouncement as to civil damages which was amicably settled and paid to the heirs of Salvador T. Padya-os (Salvador), the victim. On December 16, 2010, an information was filed charging Cawaren with the crime of murder defined and penalized under Article 248 of the Revised Penal Code (RPC), the accusatory portion of which reads: That on or about December 14, 2010, in the afternoon thereof, at Sitio Fangek, Poblacion, Sadanga, Mountain Province, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused, with intent to kill and with evident premeditation and by means of treachery, did then and there willfully, Unlawfully and feloniously attack, assault and x x .x with the use of a six[ ](6) inches blade knife stab SALVADOR T. PADYA-OS, thereby inflicting upon the latter, stab wound, .4th ICS PARAVERTEBRAL ARFP right and which caused the death of the aforenamed victim, all to the damage and prejudice of the aforementioned victim, all to the damage and prejudice of his heirs.
    [Show full text]
  • NDCC Update Sitrep No. 19 Re TY Pepeng As of 10 Oct 12:00NN
    2 Pinili 1 139 695 Ilocos Sur 2 16 65 1 Marcos 2 16 65 La Union 35 1,902 9,164 1 Aringay 7 570 3,276 2 Bagullin 1 400 2,000 3 Bangar 3 226 1,249 4 Bauang 10 481 1,630 5 Caba 2 55 193 6 Luna 1 4 20 7 Pugo 3 49 212 8 Rosario 2 30 189 San 9 Fernand 2 10 43 o City San 10 1 14 48 Gabriel 11 San Juan 1 19 111 12 Sudipen 1 43 187 13 Tubao 1 1 6 Pangasinan 12 835 3,439 1 Asingan 5 114 458 2 Dagupan 1 96 356 3 Rosales 2 125 625 4 Tayug 4 500 2,000 • The figures above may continue to go up as reports are still coming from Regions I, II and III • There are now 299 reported casualties (Tab A) with the following breakdown: 184 Dead – 6 in Pangasinan, 1 in Ilocos Sur (drowned), 1 in Ilocos Norte (hypothermia), 34 in La Union, 133 in Benguet (landslide, suffocated secondary to encavement), 2 in Ifugao (landslide), 2 in Nueva Ecija, 1 in Quezon Province, and 4 in Camarines Sur 75 Injured - 1 in Kalinga, 73 in Benguet, and 1 in Ilocos Norte 40 Missing - 34 in Benguet, 1 in Ilocos Norte, and 5 in Pangasinan • A total of 20,263 houses were damaged with 1,794 totally and 18,469 partially damaged (Tab B) • There were reports of power outages/interruptions in Regions I, II, III and CAR. Government offices in Region I continue to be operational using generator sets.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015Suspension 2008Registere
    LIST OF SEC REGISTERED CORPORATIONS FY 2008 WHICH FAILED TO SUBMIT FS AND GIS FOR PERIOD 2009 TO 2013 Date SEC Number Company Name Registered 1 CN200808877 "CASTLESPRING ELDERLY & SENIOR CITIZEN ASSOCIATION (CESCA)," INC. 06/11/2008 2 CS200719335 "GO" GENERICS SUPERDRUG INC. 01/30/2008 3 CS200802980 "JUST US" INDUSTRIAL & CONSTRUCTION SERVICES INC. 02/28/2008 4 CN200812088 "KABAGANG" NI DOC LOUIE CHUA INC. 08/05/2008 5 CN200803880 #1-PROBINSYANG MAUNLAD SANDIGAN NG BAYAN (#1-PRO-MASA NG 03/12/2008 6 CN200831927 (CEAG) CARCAR EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE GROUP RESCUE UNIT, INC. 12/10/2008 CN200830435 (D'EXTRA TOURS) DO EXCEL XENOS TEAM RIDERS ASSOCIATION AND TRACK 11/11/2008 7 OVER UNITED ROADS OR SEAS INC. 8 CN200804630 (MAZBDA) MARAGONDONZAPOTE BUS DRIVERS ASSN. INC. 03/28/2008 9 CN200813013 *CASTULE URBAN POOR ASSOCIATION INC. 08/28/2008 10 CS200830445 1 MORE ENTERTAINMENT INC. 11/12/2008 11 CN200811216 1 TULONG AT AGAPAY SA KABATAAN INC. 07/17/2008 12 CN200815933 1004 SHALOM METHODIST CHURCH, INC. 10/10/2008 13 CS200804199 1129 GOLDEN BRIDGE INTL INC. 03/19/2008 14 CS200809641 12-STAR REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP. 06/24/2008 15 CS200828395 138 YE SEN FA INC. 07/07/2008 16 CN200801915 13TH CLUB OF ANTIPOLO INC. 02/11/2008 17 CS200818390 1415 GROUP, INC. 11/25/2008 18 CN200805092 15 LUCKY STARS OFW ASSOCIATION INC. 04/04/2008 19 CS200807505 153 METALS & MINING CORP. 05/19/2008 20 CS200828236 168 CREDIT CORPORATION 06/05/2008 21 CS200812630 168 MEGASAVE TRADING CORP. 08/14/2008 22 CS200819056 168 TAXI CORP.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronic Food Insecurity Situation Overview in 71 Provinces of the Philippines 2015-2020
    Chronic Food Insecurity Situation Overview in 71 provinces of the Philippines 2015-2020 Key Highlights Summary of Classification Conclusions Summary of Underlying and Limiting Factors Out of the 71 provinces Severe chronic food insecurity (IPC Major factors limiting people from being food analyzed, Lanao del Sur, level 4) is driven by poor food secure are the poor utilization of food in 33 Sulu, Northern Samar consumption quality, quantity and provinces and the access to food in 23 provinces. and Occidental Mindoro high level of chronic undernutrition. Unsustainable livelihood strategies are major are experiencing severe In provinces at IPC level 3, quality of drivers of food insecurity in 32 provinces followed chronic food insecurity food consumption is worse than by recurrent risks in 16 provinces and lack of (IPC Level 4); 48 quantity; and chronic undernutrition financial capital in 17 provinces. provinces are facing is also a major problem. In the provinces at IPC level 3 and 4, the majority moderate chronic food The most chronic food insecure of the population is engaged in unsustainable insecurity (IPC Level 3), people tend to be the landless poor livelihood strategies and vulnerable to seasonal and 19 provinces are households, indigenous people, employment and inadequate income. affected by a mild population engaged in unsustainable Low-value livelihood strategies and high chronic food insecurity livelihood strategies such as farmers, underemployment rate result in high poverty (IPC Level 2). unskilled laborers, forestry workers, incidence particularly in Sulu, Lanao del Sur, Around 64% of the total fishermen etc. that provide Maguindanao, Sarangani, Bukidnon, Zamboanga population is chronically inadequate and often unpredictable del Norte (Mindanao), Northern Samar, Samar food insecure, of which income.
    [Show full text]