DOCSLIB.ORG

Understanding Differential Attainment Across Medical Training Pathways: a Rapid Review of the Literature Final Report Prepared for the General Medical Council

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Understanding Differential Attainment Across Medical Training Pathways: a Rapid Review of the Literature Final Report Prepared for the General Medical Council Understanding differential attainment across medical training pathways: A rapid review of the literature Final report prepared for The General Medical Council Dr Sam Regan de Bere, Dr Suzanne Nunn, Dr Mona Nasser 21/08/2015 Funded by the General Medical Council. The views expressed in this report are those of the participants and the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the General Medical Council. 1 1 Contents Table of Figures .......................................................................................................................... 4 Table of Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 Research design ................................................................................................................. 5 Analysis ............................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Current narratives of differential attainment ................................................................ 10 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 14 2 Background ...................................................................................................................... 15 3 Aims and purposes of the review .................................................................................... 15 4 Methodology .................................................................................................................... 16 4.1 Rapid review .............................................................................................................. 16 4.2 Narrative synthesis .................................................................................................... 16 5 Methods ........................................................................................................................... 17 5.1 Development and registration of protocol ............................................................... 17 5.2 Search strategy .......................................................................................................... 17 5.3 Data management and extraction ............................................................................ 20 5.4 Quality assurance ...................................................................................................... 20 6 Research Ethics ................................................................................................................ 22 7 Data Analysis .................................................................................................................... 22 8 Narrative synthesis .......................................................................................................... 25 9 Findings ............................................................................................................................ 26 9.1 The Individual or discrete group ............................................................................... 26 Study habits ..................................................................................................................... 27 Psycho-social .................................................................................................................... 27 2 Social and cultural capital ................................................................................................ 28 Success ............................................................................................................................. 28 Ethnicity ........................................................................................................................... 29 IMG ................................................................................................................................... 31 Language .......................................................................................................................... 34 Gender ............................................................................................................................. 36 9.2 The institutional ........................................................................................................ 37 The Medical School and the working environment ......................................................... 37 Mentoring ........................................................................................................................ 38 Selection ........................................................................................................................... 38 9.3 Policy ......................................................................................................................... 39 Predictors of success at postgraduate level .................................................................... 39 PMQ ................................................................................................................................. 40 High stakes examinations ................................................................................................ 40 MRCGP and MRCGP Clinical Skills Assessment (CSA) ...................................................... 41 Examiner bias ................................................................................................................... 43 10 Discussion......................................................................................................................... 45 10.1 Causes .................................................................................................................... 45 10.2 Ways of researching .............................................................................................. 46 10.3 Possible interventions ........................................................................................... 48 11 Conclusions (the story so far) .......................................................................................... 50 12 References ....................................................................................................................... 52 13 Appendices ....................................................................................................................... 56 Appendix 1: Studies and other documents included in the synthesis ............................... 56 Appendix 2: Quality evaluation of studies using primary data............................................ 87 3 Table of Figures Figure 1. Flow diagram of study selection ............................................................................... 23 Figure 2 Analysis of included studies and documents by methodology or type ..................... 24 Figure 3. Publication by date ................................................................................................... 25 Figure 4. Conceptual map of themes identified in the published literature ........................... 26 Table of Abbreviations and Acronyms AoMRC Academy of Medical Royal Colleges BME Black and minority ethnic BAPIO British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin CSA Clinical skills assessment FRCA Fellow of the Royal College of Anaesthetists (examination) GMC General Medical Council HEFCE Higher Education Funding Council for England HEFCE Higher Education Funding Council for England IELTS International English Language Testing System IMG International medical graduates MCAT Medical College Admission Test (USA) MRCOG Member of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (examination) MRCPsych Member of the Royal College of Psychiatrists MCQ Multiple choice question NBME National Board of Medical Examiners (USA) OSCE Objective Structured Clinical Examinations PMQ Primary medical qualification PLAB Professional and Linguistics Assessment Board examination RCA Royal College of Anaesthetists RCGP Royal College of General Practitioners RCOG Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists USMLE United States Medical Licensing Examination 4 Executive Summary Introduction Differential attainment is a term used to describe the variations in levels of educational achievement that occur between different demographic groups undertaking the same assessment. Differential attainment has been recognised as a challenge for medical professionals and educators since the 1990s, and has been observed in both undergraduate and postgraduate contexts. It is not specific to medical education; it is a feature of professional education more generally. Since 2010 the GMC has worked with others analysing data in order to better understand the progress of trainees through their programmes and to identify any potential differences between demographic groups. This rapid review of literature published in the period between 2004 and the present day contributes to a wider programme of research being carried out by the GMC to explore differential attainment across training pathways. Research design The research was commissioned to provide a rapid review of the corpus of knowledge relating to differential attainment. The researchers adopted a narrative synthesis methodology in order to explore how contributions to the literature
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clinical Education: a Routine Activity of Extraordinary Importance
    I EDITORIALS Clinical education: a routine activity of extraordinary importance Julie Brice and John Bligh Julie Brice The Royal College of Physicians of London (RCP) the profession is already under more external and BA PGCE, Academic was established in 1518. During its extraordinarily internal pressure than it can comfortably withstand? Support Manager; long and impressive history, it has maintained a dis- The answer is contained in the question. Clinical Peninsula College tinguished tradition of training and educating its teaching often goes unrecognised and unrewarded of Medicine and members for professional practice. In recent years, it precisely because all doctors, whatever their medical Dentistry, Plymouth has been actively developing its continuing profes- specialty, are expected to do it. But employers want John Bligh sional development schemes, conferences, lectures their ‘penny’s worth’ so the pressure is on clinicians BSc MMEd MD FRCGP and training courses. It has developed a resource to devote time to clinical practice rather than to FAcadMed, Vice centre offering a comprehensive collection of print teaching. Developing and fostering excellence in the Dean; Professor of and multimedia educational resources, and it main- next generation of healthcare professionals, despite Clinical Education; tains a comprehensive programme of fellowships, its vital importance of delivering high-quality patient Director of the lectureships and prizes. It offers mentorship and care, is seen as a ‘supporting activity’ and is therefore Institute of Clinical Education; guidance to junior doctors aiming to become consul- likely to be among the first things to get sidelined Peninsula College tant physicians, campaigns on behalf of its members, when the pressure is on.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Financial Statements 31 December 2020 CONTENTS
    Annual Report and Financial Statements 31 December 2020 CONTENTS Trustees’ Annual Report 8 2020 highlights 10 • President’s foreword 12 • Chief Executive’s foreword 14 Making an impact – our work in 2020 44 Trustees’ responsibility statement 45 Treasurer’s report & financial review 58 Independent auditor’s report Financial Statements 61 • Statement of financial activities 62 • Balance sheet 63 • Statement of cash flows 66 • Principal accounting policies 72 • Notes to the accounts 93 About this report 94 Our governance Charity Commission for England and Wales Registration Number 228636 Oce of the Scottish Charity Regulator Registration Number SC038369 2 Trustees’ Annual Report Trustees’ Annual Report 3 Our values Courage Collaboration Champion the specialty of psychiatry and its benets to patients Work together as One College – incorporating all members, employees, • • patients and carers Take every opportunity to promote and inuence the mental health agenda • Work professionally and constructively with partner organisations Take pride in our organisation and demonstrate self-belief • • Consult all relevant audiences to achieve eective outcomes • Promote parity of esteem • for the College Uphold the dignity of those aected by mental illness, intellectual disabilities Work together with patients and carers as equal partners • and developmental disorders. • • Be transparent, wherever possible and appropriate. Innovation Learning • Embrace innovation and improve ways to deliver services • Learn from all experiences Challenge ourselves and be open to new ideas • Share our learning and empower others to do the same • Value and encourage personal feedback Seek out and lead on new, and where possible evidence-based, • • ways of working Use feedback to make continuous improvements • Have the condence to take considered risks Create an enabling environment where everyone is listened to, • • regardless of seniority Embrace the methodology of Quality Improvement to improve mental • health services and the work of the College.
    [Show full text]
  • Association of Clinical Pathologists
    The Bulletin of The Royal College of Pathologists Number 163 July 2013 In this issue The Royal College of Pathologists Everything you wanted to know about your new Pathology: the science behind the cure consultant post but were afraid to ask Voice recognition in histopathology: pros and cons Public Engagement Innovation Grant Scheme www.rcpath.org/bulletin Subscribe to the Bulletin of The Royal College of Pathologists The College’s quarterly membership journal, the Bulletin, is the main means of communications between the College and its members, and between the members themselves. It features topical articles on the latest development in pathology, news from the College, as well as key events and information related to pathology. The Bulletin is delivered free of charge to all active College Members, retired Members who choose to receive mailings and Registered Trainees, and is published four times a year, in January, April, July and October. It is also available for our members to download on the College website at www.rcpath.org/bulletin The subscription rate for libraries and non-members is £100 per annum. To subscribe, contact the Publications Department on 020 7451 6730 or [email protected] Sign up today and keep up to date on what goes on in the world of pathology! The Royal College of Pathologists 2 Carlton House Terrace, London SW1Y 5AF telephone 020 7451 6700 email [email protected] website www.rcpath.org President Dr Archie Prentice Vice Presidents Dr Bernie Croal Dr Suzy Lishman Professor Mike Wells Registrar Dr Rachael
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Training Initiative Guide
    Medical Training Initiative Guide December 2013 Introduction The Medical Training Initiative (MTI) is designed to enable a small number of International Medical and Dental Graduates to enter the UK to experience training and development in the NHS for up to two years – before returning to their home country. Under the scheme, training capacity not required for planned UK/EEA training numbers is made available for overseas doctors and dentists who meet the required eligibility criteria, including obtaining registration with the General Medical Council – for doctors in the MTI scheme this is nearly always obtained via a professional sponsorship scheme with the relevant medical Royal College. The placements filled by doctors in the MTI scheme are approved by the local Deanery/Local Education & Training Board (LETB) and may also need to be approved by the relevant Royal College. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (the Academy) acts as the UK Visa Sponsor to enable participants to apply for a Tier 5 Government Authorised Exchange Scheme visa with the UK Borders Agency – this is an integral part of the MTI scheme. 2 Who is involved in the initiative? Management of the MTI is a joint approach between GMC Approved Sponsors, Postgraduate Deaneries / LETBs, NHS Trusts and the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, with support from the Department of Health. The National Advice Centre for Postgraduate Dental Education manages all dental posts. Each organisation has its own role to play within the scheme – as set out below. GMC Approved Sponsors approval of specific MTI The certificate of sponsorship is The GMC approved sponsors act placements as and when they are required for application for entry to as professional sponsors for an identified Trusts also ensure that a the UK under a Tier 5 visa.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Standards for Health and Social Care Records Report of the Joint Working Group
    Developing standards for health and social care records Report of the Joint Working Group Introduction This report was developed by a Joint Working Group (JWG) convened at the request of the Department of Health Informatics Directorate in England. It was charged with developing a business case, system of governance, constitution, operating framework and legal entity for the establishment of a federated Professional Record Standards Development Body (PRSDB). The PRSDB will have responsibility for overseeing the development of standards for the structure and content of personal records in health and social care, with a particular view to their implementation and use in electronic records. Endorsements This report is supported by a wide variety of organisations. The following bodies were represented on the JWG and endorse the contents of his report: • Academy of Medical Royal Colleges • Allied Health Professions through the National AHP Informatics Strategic Taskforce (NAHPIST) • Department of Health Informatics Directorate • National Voices • NHS National Services Scotland • Royal College of General Practitioners • Royal College of Nursing • Royal College of Ophthalmologists • Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health • Royal College of Psychiatry Informatics Committee • Royal Pharmaceutical Society • Royal College of Physicians (London) • Scottish Royal Colleges • Social Care representative • University College London Health Informatics The following organisations have indicated their support for the recommendations contained within the report: • Academy of Medical Sciences • Arthritis Research UK • Cancer Research UK • College of Occupational Therapists • Health Quality Improvement Partnership • Medical Research Council • National Nursing Informatics Strategy Taskforce (NNIST) • Research Capability Programme • Wellcome Trust Contents Section Page 1. Forewords 4 2. Executive Summary 7 3. Introduction 10 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Specialty Specific Guidance
    Specialty specific guidance on documents to be supplied in evidence for an application for entry onto the Specialist Register with a Certificate of Eligibility for Specialist Registration (CESR) Emergency Medicine This guidance is to help doctors who are applying for entry onto the Specialist Register with a CESR in Emergency Medicine. You will also need to read the Emergency Medicine Curriculum documentation Can I get advice before I submit my application? You can contact us and ask to speak to the Specialist Applications team for advice before you apply. You are strongly advised to contact the Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) for guidance before you submit an application or a review. Applicants may also be able to access advice/support from the Forum for Associate Specialists and Staff Grades (FASSGEM). What is the indicative period of training for a Certificate of Completion of Training (CCT) in Emergency Medicine? The indicative period of training for a CCT in Emergency Medicine is six years and it is very unlikely that an applicant would achieve the competences required for a CCT in a shorter period of time. The evidence you collect for your CESR application should reflect this period of training. The structure of the programme is an indicative two years in the Acute Care Common Stem (covering the areas of EM, Anaesthetics, Intensive Care Medicine and Acute Medicine usually with an indicative one year in Anaesthetics /Intensive Care Medicine and six months in each of EM and Acute Medicine) followed by an indicative four years of training in EM (covering the areas of Paediatric EM (approximately 25%), EM and EM ultrasound).
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Training Initiative Guide 2017 (PDF)
    July 2017 Medical training initiative guide Contents 03 Introduction 04 1.0 Key principles for the initiative 06 2.0 Who is involved in the initiative? 08 3.0 How the MTI works 10 4.0 Certificate of sponsorship application process 13 5.0 Frequently asked questions for trusts 17 6.0 Frequently asked questions for doctors 20 7.0 Useful contacts 2 Academy of Royal Medical Colleges Medical training initiative guide Introduction The Medical Training Initiative (MTI) is designed to enable a small number of International Medical and Dental Graduates to enter the UK to experience training and development in the NHS for up to two years. Under the scheme, training capacity not required for planned UK/EEA training numbers is made available for overseas doctors and dentists who meet the required eligibility criteria, including registration with the General Medical Council (GMC) – for doctors and temporary registration with the General Dental Council (GDC) for dentists in the MTI scheme. This is nearly always obtained via a professional sponsorship scheme with the relevant medical Royal College. The placements filled by doctors in the MTI scheme are approved by the local Deanery/ Local Education & Training Board (LETB) and may also need to be approved by the relevant Royal College. For dentists, the National Advice Centre for Postgraduate Dental Education (NACPDE) in the Faculty of Dental Surgery of the Royal College of Surgeons of England provides sponsorship. The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (the Academy) acts as the UK Visa Sponsor to enable participants to apply for a Tier 5 Government Authorised Exchange Scheme visa from the Home Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal Affiliated to International Psychiatry
    26 Volume 7 Number 1 January 2010 ISSN 1749-3676 Forthcoming international events 10–14 January 2010 10–13 March 2010 18–20 March 2010 International Preparedness and Response to 25th International Conference: Dementia – World Congress for Psychiatric Nurses Emergencies and Disasters – IPRED 2010 Making a Difference Vancouver, Canada Tel Aviv, Israel Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece Organiser: Registered Psychiatric Nurses of Contact: Dr Bruria Adini Organiser: Alzheimer’s Disease International Canada International Emai: [email protected] (ADI) Contact: Jacqollyne Keath Website: http://www.ipred.co.il/English/ Contact: Ben Stanley Website: http://www.worldcongress.ca Email: [email protected] 21–23 January 2010 Website: http://www.adi2010.org 18–20 March 2010 WPA Regional Meeting International Congress on Epilepsy, Brain Dhaka, Bangladesh and Mind Bangladesh Association of Psychiatry 17–20 March 2010 Prague, Czech Republic Psychiatry Contact: Prof. A. H. Mohammad Firoz 4th Biennial Meeting of the International Organiser: International League Against Email: [email protected] Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD) Epilepsy São Paulo, Brazil Contact: Professor Ivan Rektor 24–29 January 2010 Organiser: ISBD Email: [email protected] International Conference on Child and Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.epilepsy-brain- Family Maltreatment Website: http://www.isbd2010.org mind2010.eu San Diego, USA Organiser: The Chadwick Center for Children 19–20 March 2010 Guest editorial and Families 17–20 March 2010 Self, Selves and Sexualities:
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Royal College of Teaching: Raising the Status of the Profession © 2013 the Royal College of Surgeons of England
    TOWARD S A R OYAL COLLE TOWARDS A G E OF TEA ROYAL COLLEGE C HIN OF TEACHING G Raising the status of the profession Towards a Royal College of Teaching: Raising the status of the profession © 2013 The Royal College of Surgeons of England. Some rights reserved. First edition printed in 2013 in the United Kingdom. ISBN 978-1-904096-22-1 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivs 2.0 UK: England & Wales License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.0/uk/ You are free to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work under the following conditions: Attribution — You must give the original author credit. Non-Commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works — You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained in this publication, no guarantee can be given that all errors and omissions have been excluded. No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action as a result of the material in this publication can be accepted by The Royal College of Surgeons of England or the contributors. Published by The Royal College of Surgeons of England 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields London WC2A 3PE www.rcseng.ac.uk Printed in the United Kingdom by Advent Colour Ltd. This work is printed on FSC accredited paper. TOWARDS A ROYAL COLLEGE OF TEACHING Raising the status of the profession 1 Contents 4 Editor’s foreword Charlotte
    [Show full text]
  • Developing the List of Registered Medical Practitioners and an Update on the Data Strategy
    Council meeting, 25 February 2016 Agenda item: 11 Report title: Developing the List of Registered Medical Practitioners and an update on the Data Strategy Report by: Luke Bruce, Assistant Director, Strategy and Communication [email protected], 0207189 5482 Action: To consider Executive summary We are reporting on a number of strands of work which support our aim of becoming a more proportionate, risk based professional regulator. We are seeking to use the information and data we hold to develop a more intelligent way of regulating. We aim to help others protect patients by reflecting what we know back to the medical profession and the healthcare system. We have completed the work to add additional information to our online register, the List of Registered Medical Practitioners (LRMP). It now better reflects our regulatory responsibilities. We will now consult on a proposal for developing a two tiered approach to the register with additional information about a doctor’s practice. We have limited power to require doctors to provide new information for publication. We continue to progress our Data Strategy with a new database which brings together much of the data we hold. This provides the infrastructure to support a simple interactive reporting system; the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED), delivered in partnership with a range of medical education partners; and a new common data set for the environments that doctors work in. We are developing an intelligence model to help us use our data to understand better the risks in medical practice. Recommendations Council is asked to: a Note the progress on adding new information to the List of Registered Medical Practitioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Continuing Professional Development Scheme for Surgery September 2011
    Directors of CPD Subcommittee of the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges Continuing Professional Development Scheme for Surgery September 2011 Definition of “Continuing Professional Development” (CPD) A continuing process, outside formal undergraduate and postgraduate training, that enables individual doctors to maintain and improve standards of medical practice through the development of knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviour. CPD should also support specific changes in practice. Statement of Principle The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and the Royal College of Surgeons of England the support the Ten Principles for College/Faculty CPD schemes as revised in October 2007 [1] COLLEGE/FACULTY DETAILS Description of the College or Faculty The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow, the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and the Royal College of Surgeons of England represent surgery in general in the UK. Agreement has been reached between the surgical Royal Colleges and the nine SAC- defined specialty associations to manage CPD in a way that minimises confusion and facilitates a surgeon from any college to collect, collate and validate their CPD activities. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow Our growing collegiate body is unique to the UK. It includes professionals in surgery, medicine, dentistry, and travel medicine. We are a multidisciplinary body with 8,500 members across all Page 1 of 21 five continents. There are 2387 Surgeons. We provide many courses which are CPD approved and these are advertised on our website. Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh The RCSEd has 19,135 members and fellows of which 1,846 are in Scotland and 9,608 in the rest of the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information for Appraisal and Revalidation: Guidance for Physicians
    Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for physicians Based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges and Faculties’ core guidance for all doctors Second Edition Contents Foreword 3 General introduction 4 Introduction for physicians 7 General information 8 Providing context about what you do in all aspects of your professional work Keeping up to date 11 Maintaining and enhancing the quality of your professional work Review of your practice 14 Evaluating and improving the quality of your professional work Feedback on your practice 18 How others perceive the quality of your professional work Appendix 1 22 The domains and attributes of Good Medical Practice Appendix 2 23 Checklist of supporting information for revalidation Appendix 3 25 List of physician specialty associations Supporting information for appraisal and revalidation: guidance for physicians © Royal College of Physicians 2014 2 FOREWORD As part of revalidation, doctors will need to collect and bring to their appraisal six types of supporting information to show how they are keeping up to date and fit to practise. The GMC has outlined requirements for doctors in its guidance Supporting Information for Appraisal and Revalidation. It recommends that doctors in specialist practice should consult the supporting information guidance provided by their college or faculty. This framework amplifies the headings provided by the GMC, by providing additional detail about the GMC requirements and what each college or faculty expects relating to this, based on their specialty expertise. These expectations are laid out in each specialty guidance under 'Requirements'. Further descriptive information is given under the heading 'Guidance'. The Academy's final core guidance framework has been agreed by all Colleges and Faculties.
    [Show full text]