Population Structure, Status, and Conservation of Two Graptemys Species from the Pearl River, Mississippi Author(S): Will Selman and Robert L

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Population Structure, Status, and Conservation of Two Graptemys Species from the Pearl River, Mississippi Author(S): Will Selman and Robert L Population Structure, Status, and Conservation of Two Graptemys Species from the Pearl River, Mississippi Author(s): Will Selman and Robert L. Jones Source: Journal of Herpetology, 51(1):27-36. Published By: The Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1670/15-082 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1670/15-082 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 51, No. 1, 27–36, 2017 Copyright 2017 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Population Structure, Status, and Conservation of Two Graptemys Species from the Pearl River, Mississippi 1,2,3 4 WILL SELMAN AND ROBERT L. JONES 1 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Drive, 5018, Hattiesburg, Mississippi, USA 2 Department of Biology, Millsaps College, 1701 North State Street, Jackson, Mississippi, USA 4Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Museum of Natural Science, 2148 Riverside Drive, Jackson, Mississippi, USA ABSTRACT.—Graptemys is one of the least studied turtle genera in North America. Graptemys oculifera (Ringed Sawback) and Graptemys pearlensis (Pearl Map Turtle) are endemic to the Pearl River system of Mississippi and southeastern Louisiana. We studied both species near Columbia, Mississippi, on the Pearl River via a trapping and basking surveys over two years. Additionally, five sites including Columbia were trapped for 27 years to determine long-term trends in capture success and relative abundance (RA). At the Columbia site, body size distribution was bimodal for G. oculifera and atypically unimodal for G. pearlensis; G. pearlensis body lengths were smaller than museum specimens. Population estimates for G. oculifera at the Columbia site indicate a stable population over 25 years. Long-term RA trends indicated that G. pearlensis was less common than G. oculifera in all periods and at all sites from 1988 to 2013. Trends in long-term capture success for G. oculifera and G. pearlensis were negative at all sites, with significant declines at three sites for both G. oculifera and G. pearlensis. Declines occurred both upstream and downstream of a major reservoir. Therefore, a combination of factors (including altered hydrology, human disturbance, lack of recruitment, excessive sedimentation, impaired water quality, and/or the pet trade) appear to be contributing to declines. Additional conservation and protection is warranted for G. pearlensis, and current protections for G. oculifera should be extended. Future studies should continue at our long-term sites to determine whether population declines persist or whether populations stabilize. Understanding wildlife population sizes and demography are either G. pulchra (sensu lato; Lovich and McCoy, 1992) or G. central tenets for species conservation efforts; however, these gibbonsi (sensu lato; Ennen et al., 2010); 2) it was perceived to data are lacking for many southeastern freshwater turtle species need less conservation attention, because it was not a drainage to aid in conservation efforts. In particular, Graptemys (map endemic as either G. pulchra (sensu lato) or G. gibbonsi (sensu turtles and sawbacks) is considered one of the least studied lato); and 3) it was overshadowed by the federally threatened turtle genera in North America (Lovich and Ennen, 2013); yet status of G. oculifera. The latter directed more funding resources many species within the genus are of conservation concern toward G. oculifera research to understand basic life-history and (Buhlmann and Gibbons, 1997; van Dijk et al., 2014) and lack ecological characteristics, with data for G. pearlensis only basic life-history information (Lindeman, 2013). Further, most of collected secondarily. the species solely inhabit riverine environments and associated The first objective in this study was to document in-depth water bodies (e.g., oxbows and bayous), with nine of the 14 population structure and densities of both G. oculifera and G. species endemic to single river drainages of the Gulf of Mexico pearlensis at one site on the lower Pearl River of southern (Lindeman, 2013). Many of the endemic Gulf Coast Graptemys Mississippi. The second objective was to examine trends in are considered the least understood within the group (Lovich trapping success (i.e., catch per unit effort, CPUE) and relative and Ennen, 2013). abundance (RA) at five sites throughout the Pearl River system Two such species, Graptemys oculifera (Ringed Sawback; Baur, in Mississippi for 27 yr. The third goal was to compare the data 1890) and Graptemys pearlensis (Pearl Map Turtle; Ennen et al., collected in this study to historical data for both species within 2010), occur sympatrically in the Pearl River system of central the drainage. Mississippi and southeastern Louisiana. Considerable knowl- edge is available for G. oculifera including population densities (Jones and Hartfield, 1995; Dickerson and Reine, 1996; Linde- MATERIALS AND METHODS man, 1998; Shively, 1999), population structure (Jones and Hartfield, 1995), reproductive ecology (Jones, 2006), and Study Sites.—For the detailed demographic study, we conduct- population genetics (Gaillard et al., 2015). Most of this ed fieldwork on 8.3 river kilometers (rkm) of the Pearl River near information was made possible because the species was listed the town of Columbia (Marion County, MS; Fig. 1). The as federally threatened in 1986 (USFWS, 1986) and with the Columbia site is characteristic of a medium-sized (~75–175 m undertaking of proposed studies outlined in the G. oculifera wide), Gulf Coastal Plain river, with alternating pointbar and recovery plan (Stewart, 1988). Most of the available data for G. cutbank sections, abundant submergent and emergent dead- pearlensis, however, is coincidental to visual population density wood snags, and a sand and gravel substrate. The flow of the 3 surveys focused on G. oculifera (Dickerson and Reine, 1996; Pearl River (discharge: 24–1700 m /sec) is primarily regulated by Lindeman, 1998; Shively, 1999), with all data reported prior to the Ross Barnett Reservoir spillway, ~240 rkm upstream from the its recognition as a separate Graptemys taxon (Ennen et al., 2010). site. The site is surrounded by riparian bottomland forest (i.e., Presumably, the lack of data available for G. pearlensis is because Water Oak [Quercus nigra], Baldcypress [Taxodium distichum], 1) it previously had a much wider range when considered as Sycamore [Platanus occidentalis], Spruce Pine [Pinus glabra]), as well as a small amount of pasture land and a small number of 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] fishing camps. The eastern bank at the southern end of the site is DOI: 10.1670/15-082 bordered by a local park, which is a county-maintained and - 28 W. SELMAN AND R. L. JONES FIG. 1. The geographic location of the Pearl River in the southeastern United States (top inset) and map of sample sites in central Mississippi (bottom). Cross-hatching represents areas where Graptemys oculifera and Graptemys pearlensis co-occur, whereas stippling represents upstream areas only occupied by G. pearlensis (based on maps by Lindeman, 2013) and new records of Lindeman (2014a, b). operated park with a boat launch, ball fields, and pavilions. (Lakeland, Monticello, Columbia). These study sites are Boating levels on the river are relatively low even though the described in more detail by Jones and Hartfield (1995). boat ramp provides river access. Short-Term Study.—During 2005–2006, Graptemys species were For the long-term study (1988 and 2014), we trapped over trapped at the Columbia site for 2–4 days per month from April to October. We trapped turtles by attaching open topped basking multiple sampling periods, not including the 2005/2006 traps (made of 3/4-inch PVC coated crawfish wire; Fish Net trapping at Columbia described below. This includes at the Company, Jonesville, LA) to emergent deadwood and left them Columbia site (N = 6 sampling periods) and four other sites— slightly submerged (Selman et al., 2012). Traps varied in size Carthage (6), Ratliff Ferry (7), Lakeland (7), and Monticello (7)— (from 56 · 46 · 31 cm to 122 · 61 · 25 cm) and were attached to determine long-term trends in species CPUE and RA (Fig. 1). with nails and cotton twine to known Graptemys basking logs or Two sites are located upstream of the Ross Barnett Reservoir branches used by both sexes and different size classes. Trap sites (Carthage, Ratliff Ferry), and three sites are located downstream were later approached rapidly via motorized boat, which startled PEARL RIVER GRAPTEMYS STATUS AND CONSERVATION 29 basking turtles into the traps. A maximum of 17 traps were used 1996), because it did not require uniquely marked turtles, and during a trap-day, and each trap was checked approximately additional marked individuals could be added to the popula- every hour; traps were occasionally adjusted because of tion between survey intervals. fluctuating water levels or moved if turtles avoided the trap site. For the long-term study, we used a linear regression to Turtles also were captured opportunistically by hand or by dip analyze the RA of G. pearlensis for all sites over the 27-yr time net. period; G. oculifera RA trend would be the inverse relationship.
Recommended publications
  • Graptemys Oculifera (Baur 1890) - Ringed Map Turtle, Ringed Sawback
    Conservation Biology ofFreshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project ofthe IUCNISSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group 033.1 A .G./. Rhodin, P.CH. Pritchard, P.P. van Dijk, RA. Saumure, KA. Buh/mann, JB. lverson, and RA. Mittermeier, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs ( ISSN I 088-7I 05) No. 5, doi: IO3854/ crm.5.033 .oculifera.v 12009 © 2009 by CheIonian Research Foundation • Published 20 November 2009 Graptemys oculifera (Baur 1890) - Ringed Map Turtle, Ringed Sawback ROBERT L. JONES1 AND WILL SELMAN2 'Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Museum ofNatural Science, 2148 Riverside Drive, Jackson, Mississippi 39202 USA [[email protected]]; 2Department ofB iological Sciences, The University ofSouthern Mississippi, 118 College Drive #5018, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406 USA [[email protected]) SUMMARY. - The ringed map turtle, Graptemys oculifera (Family Emydidae), is a medium-sized aquatic turtle that inhabits the Pearl River watershed of Mississippi and Louisiana. This species prefers larger rivers with current and abundant basking structure in the form of deadwood. Males (carapace length to 109 mm) are much smaller than females (to 215 mm) and mature between 2 and 4 yrs of age, with females maturing between 10 and 16 yrs. Nesting occurs primarily on sandbars from May to July, average clutch size is 3.66 eggs, clutch size ranges from 1 to 10, and annual clutch frequency is 1.10. Nest predation is relatively high, with ca. 86% destroyed by vertebrate preda­ tors, usually raccoons, fish crows, or armadillos. The diet is composed primarily of aquatic insects . Densities range from 90 to over 340 turtles per river km.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Name: ALABAMA MAP TURTLE Scientific Name: Graptemys Pulchra Baur Other Commonly Used Names: Alabama Sawback Previously
    Common Name: ALABAMA MAP TURTLE Scientific Name: Graptemys pulchra Baur Other Commonly Used Names: Alabama sawback Previously Used Scientific Names: none Family: Emydidae Rarity Ranks: G4/S1 State Legal Status: Rare Federal Legal Status: none Description: The Alabama map turtle reaches a maximum carapace length of 27.3 cm (10¾ inches). The medially-keeled carapace has a series of laterally compressed spines which are especially pronounced posteriorly. A narrow dark stripe extends along the length of the keel, though it may be interrupted. The majority of the carapace is olive-colored with faint yellow reticulations. Relatively conspicuous concentric yellow markings are found on the dorsal surface of the marginal scutes. The pale yellow plastron has dark markings along the seams, and the ventral surface of the marginals is patterned with a set of concentric dark rings. The skin is dark brown or olive and has many light-green or yellow stripes. A large yellow or light-green patch or "mask" is present on the head, between and behind the eyes. Adult females are much larger than males and have greatly enlarged heads. Similar Species: Common map turtles (Graptemys geographica) may be found in association with Alabama map turtles within the Coosa River drainage, but the latter can be distinguished by their prominent spiny keel on the carapace (except old adult females) and the large yellow or light-green blotch present on the head between and behind the eyes. Habitat: This species prefers large streams or rivers with swiftly flowing water and an abundance of basking sites in the form of fallen trees or snags.
    [Show full text]
  • In AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): Species in Red = Depleted to the Point They May Warrant Federal Endangered Species Act Listing
    Southern and Midwestern Turtle Species Affected by Commercial Harvest (in AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): species in red = depleted to the point they may warrant federal Endangered Species Act listing Common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) – AR, GA, IA, KY, MO, OH, OK, SC, TX Florida common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina osceola) - FL Southern painted turtle (Chrysemys dorsalis) – AR Western painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) – IA, MO, OH, OK Spotted turtle (Clemmys gutatta) - FL, GA, OH Florida chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia chrysea) – FL Western chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia miaria) – AR, FL, GA, KY, MO, OK, TN, TX Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri) - FL, GA Cagle’s map turtle (Graptemys caglei) - TX Escambia map turtle (Graptemys ernsti) – FL Common map turtle (Graptemys geographica) – AR, GA, OH, OK Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis) – AR, GA, OH, OK, TX Sabine map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis sabinensis) – TX False map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) – MO, OK, TX Mississippi map turtle (Graptemys pseuogeographica kohnii) – AR, TX Alabama map turtle (Graptemys pulchra) – GA Texas map turtle (Graptemys versa) - TX Striped mud turtle (Kinosternon baurii) – FL, GA, SC Yellow mud turtle (Kinosternon flavescens) – OK, TX Common mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum) – AR, FL, GA, OK, TX Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) – AR, FL, GA, LA, MO, TX Diamond-back terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) – FL, GA, LA, SC, TX River cooter (Pseudemys concinna) – AR, FL,
    [Show full text]
  • Alabama Map Turtle
    Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project ofEmydidae the IUCN/SSC — TortoiseGraptemys and Freshwater pulchra Turtle Specialist Group 072.1 A.G.J. Rhodin, P.C.H. Pritchard, P.P. van Dijk, R.A. Saumure, K.A. Buhlmann, J.B. Iverson, and R.A. Mittermeier, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs (ISSN 1088-7105) No. 5, doi:10.3854/crm.5.072.pulchra.v1.2014 © 2014 by Chelonian Research Foundation • Published 6 January 2014 Graptemys pulchra Baur 1893 – Alabama Map Turtle JEFFREY E. LOVICH 1, JAMES C. GODWIN 2, AND C.J. MCCOY 3 1U.S. Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, 2255 North Gemini Drive MS-9394, Flagstaff, Arizona 86001 USA [[email protected]]; 2Alabama Natural Heritage Program, Environmental Institute, 1090 S. Donahue Drive, Auburn University, Alabama 36849 USA [[email protected]]; 3Deceased; formerly Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213 USA SUMMARY . – The Alabama Map Turtle, Graptemys pulchra (Family Emydidae), is a moderately large riverine species endemic to the Mobile Bay drainage system of Alabama, Georgia, and Missis- sippi. Sexual size dimorphism is pronounced, with adult females (carapace length [CL] to 273 mm) attaining more than twice the size of adult males (CL to 117 mm). The species is an inhabitant of relatively large, swift creeks and rivers, often with wide sandbars. Stream sections open to the sun and with abundant basking sites in the form of logs and brush are preferred. Six to seven clutches of 4–7 eggs are laid each year on river sandbars. Although the species is locally abundant, popula- tions are threatened by habitat destruction, declines in their prey base, commercial collection, and vandalism.
    [Show full text]
  • CHELONIAN CONSERVATION and BIOLOGY International Journal of Turtle and Tortoise Research
    CHELONIAN CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGY International Journal of Turtle and Tortoise Research Genetic and Morphological Variation Between Populations of the Pascagoula Map Turtle (Graptemys gibbonsi) in the Pearl and Pascagoula Rivers with Description of a New Species 1,2 2 1 1 1 JOSHUA R. ENNEN ,JEFFREY E. LOVICH ,BRIAN R. KREISER ,W.SELMAN , AND CARL P. Q UALLS 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406 USA [[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]]; 2US Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Northern Arizona University, Applied Research and Development Building, PO Box 5614, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 USA [[email protected]] Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 2010, 9(1): 98–113 g 2010 Chelonian Research Foundation Genetic and Morphological Variation Between Populations of the Pascagoula Map Turtle (Graptemys gibbonsi) in the Pearl and Pascagoula Rivers with Description of a New Species 1,2 2 1 1 1 JOSHUA R. ENNEN ,JEFFREY E. LOVICH ,BRIAN R. KREISER ,W.SELMAN , AND CARL P. Q UALLS 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406 USA [[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]]; 2US Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Northern Arizona University, Applied Research and Development Building, PO Box 5614, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 USA [[email protected]] ABSTRACT. – Cryptic or undescribed species pose a major problem in conservation biology. Managing multiple unresolved taxa collectively as a single entity could precipitate the loss of unrecognized genetic variation and unique populations and, possibly, lead to extinction of undiscovered or unrecognized taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting the Stage for Understanding Globalization of the Asian Turtle Trade
    Setting the Stage for Understanding Globalization of the Asian Turtle Trade: Global, Asian, and American Turtle Diversity, Richness, Endemism, and IUCN Red List Threat Levels Anders G.J. Rhodin and Peter Paul van Dijk IUCN Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Chelonian Research Foundation, Conservation International Thursday, January 20, 2011 New Species Described 2010 Photo C. Hagen Graptemys pearlensis - Pearl River Map Turtle Louisiana and Mississippi, USA Red List: Not Evaluated [Endangered] Thursday, January 20, 2011 IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group Founded 1980 www.iucn-tftsg.org Thursday, January 20, 2011 International Union for the Conservation of Nature / Species Survival Commission www.iucn.org Thursday, January 20, 2011 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Fauna and Flora www.cites.org Thursday, January 20, 2011 Chelonian Conservation and Biology Thomson Reuters’ ISI Journal Citation Impact Factor currently ranks CCB among the top 100 zoology journals worldwide www.chelonianjournals.org Thursday, January 20, 2011 Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises www.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt Thursday, January 20, 2011 IUCN Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group Members: Work or Focus - 2010 274 Members - 107 Countries Thursday, January 20, 2011 Species, Additional Subspecies, and Total Taxa of Turtles and Tortoises 500 Species Add. Subspecies 375 Total Taxa 250 125 0 1758176617831789179218011812183518441856187318891909193419551961196719771979198619891992199420062007200820092010 Currently Recognized: 334 species, 127 add. subspecies, 461 total taxa Thursday, January 20, 2011 Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Species Richness Buhlmann, Akre, Iverson, Karapatakis, Mittermeier, Georges, Rhodin, van Dijk, and Gibbons. 2009. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 8:116–149. Thursday, January 20, 2011 Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Species Richness – Global Rankings 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of the Turtle Family Emydidae
    67 (1): 1 – 122 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2017. 30.6.2017 A Systematic Review of the Turtle Family Emydidae Michael E. Seidel1 & Carl H. Ernst 2 1 4430 Richmond Park Drive East, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA and Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA; [email protected] — 2 Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, mrc 162, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 200137012, USA; [email protected] Accepted 19.ix.2016. Published online at www.senckenberg.de / vertebrate-zoology on 27.vi.2016. Abstract Family Emydidae is a large and diverse group of turtles comprised of 50 – 60 extant species. After a long history of taxonomic revision, the family is presently recognized as a monophyletic group defined by unique skeletal and molecular character states. Emydids are believed to have originated in the Eocene, 42 – 56 million years ago. They are mostly native to North America, but one genus, Trachemys, occurs in South America and a second, Emys, ranges over parts of Europe, western Asia, and northern Africa. Some of the species are threatened and their future survival depends in part on understanding their systematic relationships and habitat requirements. The present treatise provides a synthesis and update of studies which define diversity and classification of the Emydidae. A review of family nomenclature indicates that RAFINESQUE, 1815 should be credited for the family name Emydidae. Early taxonomic studies of these turtles were based primarily on morphological data, including some fossil material. More recent work has relied heavily on phylogenetic analyses using molecular data, mostly DNA. The bulk of current evidence supports two major lineages: the subfamily Emydinae which has mostly semi-terrestrial forms ( genera Actinemys, Clemmys, Emydoidea, Emys, Glyptemys, Terrapene) and the more aquatic subfamily Deirochelyinae ( genera Chrysemys, Deirochelys, Graptemys, Malaclemys, Pseudemys, Trachemys).
    [Show full text]
  • Heinrich and Walsh (2019)
    THE BIG TURTLE YEAR LOOKING FOR WILD TURTLES IN WILD PLACES By George L. Heinrich and Timothy J. Walsh e like looking for wild turtles in wild We both liked turtles as kids, but now, many places. From the time George was in years later, we understand the important ecological Welementary school catching Wood roles they play. Some turtle species serve as indica- Turtles in southwestern Connecticut and Tim tors of environmental health, while others are clas- found his first pebble-sized Striped Mud Turtle sified as keystone species (those that play a vital at age 10 in a south Florida stream, we have both ecological role in a given habitat), umbrella spe- marveled at being in nature and searching for these cies (those whose conservation benefits the larger fascinating reptiles. As children, little did we know ecological community), or flagship species (iconic that our time spent exploring our neighborhood symbols of habitat conservation efforts). Perhaps woods would lead to rewarding careers in wildlife one of the best examples of the ecological signifi- conservation. Now we are both officers with the cance of turtles is the Gopher Tortoise, an imper- Florida Turtle Conservation Trust, an organization iled species that occurs in a six-state range within working to conserve Florida’s rich turtle diversity. the Southeastern Coastal Plain of the United States. In 2017 we created the opportunity of a Appropriately, the Gopher Tortoise was the first lifetime with the Trust’s conservation education species we found on day one of The Big Turtle Year. initiative: The Big Turtle Year, an ambitious plan to travel across the United States and back again SoutheaSt Regional highlightS trying to find as many species as we could.
    [Show full text]
  • Graptemys Barbouri)
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Barbour’s Map Turtle (Graptemys barbouri) Adult female Barbour’s map turtle, Chipola River, FL. (credit: Jonathan Mays, FWC) May 2017 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Atlanta, GA This document was prepared by Lisa Yarbrough (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Panama City, FL Ecological Services Field Office) with assistance from Dr. Sean Blomquist (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Panama City, FL Ecological Services Field Office) and Andreas Moshogianis (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Region 4/Southeast Regional Office). Valuable peer reviews of a draft of this document were provided by John Jensen (Georgia Department of Natural Resources), Jonathan Mays (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), Jim Godwin (Alabama Natural Heritage Program), Lora Smith (Joseph W. Jones Ecological Research Center, Georgia), Sean Sterrett (University of Massachusetts), and Marshall Williams (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service – Region 4/ Southeast Regional Office). We appreciate the time and effort of those dedicated to learning and implementing the SSA Framework, which resulted in a more robust assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2017. Species status assessment report for the Barbour’s Map Turtle (Graptemys barbouri). May, 2017. Atlanta, GA. Barbour’s Map Turtle SSA Page ii 2017 Species Status Assessment Report For Barbour’s Map Turtle (Graptemys barbouri) Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This species status assessment (SSA) reports the results of the comprehensive status review for the Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri), documenting the species’ historical condition and providing estimates of current and future condition under a range of different scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4Th Edition December 2015
    Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) Chelonian Advisory Group Regional Collection Plan 4th Edition December 2015 Editor Chelonian TAG Steering Committee 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Mission ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Steering Committee Structure ........................................................................................................... 3 Officers, Steering Committee Members, and Advisors ..................................................................... 4 Taxonomic Scope ............................................................................................................................. 6 Space Analysis Space .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Survey ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Current and Potential Holding Table Results ............................................................................. 8 Species Selection Process Process ..................................................................................................................................... 11 Decision Tree ........................................................................................................................... 13 Decision Tree Results .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TSA Magazine 2009
    AUGUST 2009 TSATURTLE SURVIVAL ALLIANCE Transforming passion for turtles into effective conservation action through a global network of living collections and recovery programs WWW.TURTLESURVIVAL.ORG The Northern Spider Tortoise, (Pyxis arachnoides brygooi) See Cover Story on p.5 Peter Praschag, Behler Chelonian Center 1 From the President's Desk Ability to respond rapidly is what sets TSA apart s I write this letter, we have just received news that the female Rafetus has laid her first clutch of 56 eggs at Suzhou Zoo for the 2009 Aseason. After suffering last year’s disappointing news, the TSA regrouped and is giving it 100%, addressing some of the problems seen in 2008. We hope to be able to report soon that the world’s population of Rafetus has grown by fourteen-fold and to show the first photographs of a live hatchling R. swinhoei. When Dr. Gerald Kuchling’s email message arrived with this much-anticipated news, he requested that we try and find funding for a camcorder to mount over theRafetus nesting beach that would make finding eggs easier. I forwarded the email to the new TSA Board and almost immediately David Shapiro responded from Hong Kong, offering up the $1,400 requested. It struck me later what an amazing example this was of the TSA network’s strength, and our ability to respond to turtle conservation issues around the globe. No other turtle conservation organization is positioned to respond as rapidly or effectively as the TSA. Another notable strength of the TSA is our global network of veterinarians that can mobilize quickly when situations demand.
    [Show full text]
  • REPTILIA: TESTUDINES: EMYDIDAE Graptemys Pearlensis
    889.1 REPTILIA: TESTUDINES: EMYDIDAE Graptemys pearlensis Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. Ennen, J.R., J.E. Lovich, and R. Birkhead. 2012. Graptemys pearlensis. Graptemys pearlensis Ennen, Lovich, Kreiser, Selman, and Qualls Pearl River Map Turtle Graptemys pulchra : Cagle 1952:223 (part). Graptemys gibbonsi : Lovich and McCoy 1992:293 (part). Graptemys pearlensis Ennen, Lovich, Kreiser, Sel- man, and Qualls 2010:104. Type-locality, “Pearl A female Graptemys pearlensis from the Pearl FIGURE 1. River at State Highway 28, near Georgetown, Co- River in Louisiana, specific locality unknown. Photograph piah County, Mississippi, USA”. Holotype, Carne- by Cris Hagen. gie Museum of Natural History (CM) 62162, an adult male, collected by T.E. Magers on 23 Sept- ember 1967. because G. pearlensis was not recognized at the time, and was included within G. gibbonsi from the • CONTENT . No subspecies are recognized. Pascagoula River (Ennen et al. 2010). Detailed descriptions of the differences between the two • DEFINITION . The Pearl River Map Turtle, Grap- species are given in Ennen et al. (2010). temys pearlensis , is a large aquatic species with maximum carapace length (CL) reaching 295 mm in • ILLUSTRATIONS . Color photographs of Grapt- females and a maximum CL of 120.7 mm in males emys pearlensis are found in Bonin et al (2006), (Ennen et al. 2010). The high-domed shell has a pro - Buhlmann et al. (2008), Ennen et al. (2010), and nounced median keel with a complete black or brown Mara (1996). Black-and-white illustrations of G. pearl- stripe and prominent spines on the posterior portions ensis are in Cagle (1952; as G.
    [Show full text]