DOCSLIB.ORG

Ringed Map Turtle (Graptemys Oculifera) Surveys on the Pearl River

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ringed Map Turtle (Graptemys Oculifera) Surveys on the Pearl River Ringed Map Turtle (Graptemys oculifera) Surveys on the Pearl River Washington Parish Keri Landry, Biologist Louisiana Natural Heritage Program Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries Introduction Ringed map turtles (Graptemys oculifera) are endemic to the Pearl River and its tributaries in Mississippi and Louisiana in stretches with moderate current, sand beaches, and abundant basking structures. The LDWF conducted a basking survey during 2009-2010 along the Bogue Chitto River in Louisiana, a tributary of the Pearl River, which showed a decline in ringed map turtle numbers over the past decade. Periodic surveys within this river system are necessary to evaluate population trends. For the current project, mark-resight techniques were used along the northern stretch of the Pearl River in Washington parish. The Pearl River map turtle, Graptemys pearlensis (formerly known as Pascagoula map turtle, Graptemys gibbonsi) is also endemic to the Pearl River and its tributaries in Louisiana and Mississippi and the status of this species was also assessed during this project. Nesting areas were assessed along the Pearl River survey sites. Issues were documented such as ATV use on sandbars, sand and gravel mining, invasive species and other activities detrimental to nesting turtles. Goals • Obtain population estimates of the ringed map turtle on the Pearl River • Assess quality and amount of available nesting habitat • Assess quality and amount of basking/foraging sites • Update LNHP database with current locality data for this species • Address issues with activities detrimental to nesting turtles Survey Methodology Trapping Surveys were conducted along two stretches of the Pearl River, north and south of the Bogalusa public boat launch in Washington Parish during October 2011, May and October 2012 to assess current status of G. oculifera and G. pearlensis (Figure 1). A 16-foot aluminum Jon boat with 25Hp motor was used to peruse the river to monitor structures, such as logs and branches, for basking turtles particularly Graptemys spp. Once basking structures were selected, various sizes of open-topped basking traps made of crawfish wire were attached to logs and branches with nails and cotton twine and slightly submerged to conceal the trap from basking turtles. Approximately 10-13 traps were used during each trapping period and when possible, turtles were also captured by hand using a dip net. Logs and branches with basking traps were monitored frequently for turtles. Captured Graptemys species were identified, weighed, measured, and permanently marked. Individuals were also temporarily marked on the 2nd and 3rd vertebral scutes with a waterproof, tree-marking spray paint (Aervoe® Lead- Free Fluorescent Glo Spray Paint, Aervoe Industries, Inc.) for mark-resight surveys. G. oculifera were marked with fluorescent orange and G. pearlensis were marked with fluorescent green spray paint to distinguish the species. Tail clips were also collected for subsequent genetics analysis. Turtles were then released at their capture location. Resight Survey Resight surveys were conducted on May 31st, June 26-27th, and October 24th, 2012 within optimal conditions for basking turtles and along the river stretches that were surveyed with traps. Resight surveys began after at least 10 turtles were paint-marked to ensure an adequate number of marked turtles were available for surveys and 2-3 weeks after the first turtle was marked to ensure no loss of paint marks. Biologists began at the upstream end of sandbars and scanned basking structures with a pair of 10x40 binoculars and a spotting scope with 20-60x zoom eyepiece mounted on a tripod. Data collection included number of marked and unmarked turtles, species, age classes (adult, juvenile), and gender if feasible. Shively (1999) recommended that surveys not be conducted during late summer because basking rates are expected to decrease when water temperatures rise too high; therefore, surveys in 2011 and 2012 ceased by the end of June until October. Nest Survey Nest surveys were conducted on sandbars within the survey area south of the Bogalusa public boat launch on the Pearl River on August 1st, 2012. Transects were conducted across the entire area of each sandbar in search of tracks and nests. All tracks were identified and noted as well as the number and condition of nests. Results Trapping The total length surveyed for basking turtles is approximately 10 river kilometers (rkm); a 6 rkm stretch north of Bogalusa and a 4 rkm stretch south of Bogalusa (Figure 2). A total of 28 turtles were marked during this survey effort; 26 G. oculifera and two G. pearlensis (Table 1). Approximately 77 percent of all G. oculifera captured during surveys were adults and adults accounted for 75 percent of the total for all captured species. There was nearly a 1:1 ratio when comparing captures of males to females. The two captures with unknown gender were due to the individuals being too young to determine gender. Other species caught in traps were Pseudemys concinna (river cooter), Trachemys scripta (red-eared slider), Apalone spinifera (spiny softshell), and Sternotherus carinatus (razor-back musk turtle). Resight Survey The most common species observed basking was G. oculifera, accounting for approximately 82 percent of the total number of individuals (Table 2). The total number of G. oculifera captured was divided in gender by 57 males and 26 females with 30 individuals noted as unknown for gender due to limitations while surveying. One paint- marked male G. oculifera was observed basking during resight surveys. One female G. pearlensis was observed and only 3 unidentified Graptemys and 2 unidentified turtles were included in the total count of turtles for this survey effort. Nest Survey Many turtle tracks and several nests were observed while walking transects. Tracks were followed to find potential nests. A total of 22 nests with egg shells remnants, either intact or pieces, were counted during this survey. Eight of these nests were nearly absent of egg shells and appeared to be depredated. Other tracks observed while nest searching include human, feral hog, raccoon, opossum, deer, vulture, turkey, and wading bird. Discussion Due to multiple boat motor issues and the labor intensive nature of this project, additional trapping and mark-resight surveys are necessary to completely assess the population status of these turtles. Evidence of reproduction was observed during the 2012 surveys, although more time should be given to nest searching. Additional nest surveys will be conducted to determine the amount of available and occupied nesting habitat and nest success of Graptemys species. Environmental and habitat data will be collected during future surveys to assess basking site availability and examine environmental and habitat trends. Locality data entry into the LNHP database will be completed by spring 2013. Issues such as ATV use on sandbars, sand and gravel mining, invasive species and other activities detrimental to nesting turtles should be addressed by coordinating with LDWF scenic rivers, other agencies and by providing technical assistance to private landowners in key areas. As evidenced from nesting surveys, feral hogs may be a serious issue for nesting turtles along the Pearl River and will be examined further in the future. Recommendations • The Pearl River system is designated as a Natural and Scenic river under the LDWF Scenic Rivers Program; therefore, it is protected from clearing or snagging. Continue to use Best Management Practices for Streamside Management Zones to protect exposed sandbars and maintain deadwood for basking sites. • As required by the ringed map turtle recovery plan for delisting there should be evidence of increasing populations within the Pearl River System and its tributaries over a 10 year period. Conduct periodic surveys to monitor population trends. • Minimize anthropogenic changes in river hydrology, which limits the availability of exposed sandbars, and causes decreased water quality, to prevent further declines in current populations. Conduct all work as necessary to minimize impacts such as heavy runoff and siltation. • Nest surveys should be conducted to determine the amount of available and occupied nesting habitat. Landowners should be notified of any observed activities that are detrimental to nesting turtles. Nest surveys provide vital information which would be beneficial in protecting these Graptemys species. Future projects should include an assessment of habitat type and basking site availability and document disturbance or change in flow. Acknowledgements The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service provided Section 6 funding in support of this survey effort. Will Selman (LDWF- Rockefeller NWR), Randy Wiggins and Beau Gregory (LDWF-LNHP), and Jeremy Miller (LDWF- Marine Fisheries) assisted with surveys. Joe Nehlig with Lee Memorial Forest provided housing during extended field days. Tim Ruth with LDWF-Inland Fisheries provided the use of their boat. References Dickerson, D. D. and K. J. Reine. 1996. Habitat assessment and relative abundance estimates for the ringed sawback turtle (Graptemys oculifera) in dredging sites of the West Pearl River Navigation Project (Louisiana): Final Project Report. U.S. Army Engineer District, Vicksburg. 21 pp. plus tables, figures and appendices. Ennen, J. R., J. E. Lovich, B. R. Kreiser, W. Selman and C. P. Qualls. 2010. Genetic and Morphological Variation Between Populations of the Pascagoula Map Turtle (Graptemys gibbonsi) in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Graptemys Oculifera (Baur 1890) - Ringed Map Turtle, Ringed Sawback
    Conservation Biology ofFreshwater Turtles and Tortoises: A Compilation Project ofthe IUCNISSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group 033.1 A .G./. Rhodin, P.CH. Pritchard, P.P. van Dijk, RA. Saumure, KA. Buh/mann, JB. lverson, and RA. Mittermeier, Eds. Chelonian Research Monographs ( ISSN I 088-7I 05) No. 5, doi: IO3854/ crm.5.033 .oculifera.v 12009 © 2009 by CheIonian Research Foundation • Published 20 November 2009 Graptemys oculifera (Baur 1890) - Ringed Map Turtle, Ringed Sawback ROBERT L. JONES1 AND WILL SELMAN2 'Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Museum ofNatural Science, 2148 Riverside Drive, Jackson, Mississippi 39202 USA [[email protected]]; 2Department ofB iological Sciences, The University ofSouthern Mississippi, 118 College Drive #5018, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406 USA [[email protected]) SUMMARY. - The ringed map turtle, Graptemys oculifera (Family Emydidae), is a medium-sized aquatic turtle that inhabits the Pearl River watershed of Mississippi and Louisiana. This species prefers larger rivers with current and abundant basking structure in the form of deadwood. Males (carapace length to 109 mm) are much smaller than females (to 215 mm) and mature between 2 and 4 yrs of age, with females maturing between 10 and 16 yrs. Nesting occurs primarily on sandbars from May to July, average clutch size is 3.66 eggs, clutch size ranges from 1 to 10, and annual clutch frequency is 1.10. Nest predation is relatively high, with ca. 86% destroyed by vertebrate preda­ tors, usually raccoons, fish crows, or armadillos. The diet is composed primarily of aquatic insects . Densities range from 90 to over 340 turtles per river km.
    [Show full text]
  • Movement and Habitat Use of Two Aquatic Turtles (Graptemys Geographica and Trachemys Scripta) in an Urban Landscape
    Urban Ecosyst DOI 10.1007/s11252-008-0049-8 Movement and habitat use of two aquatic turtles (Graptemys geographica and Trachemys scripta) in an urban landscape Travis J. Ryan & Christopher A. Conner & Brooke A. Douthitt & Sean C. Sterrett & Carmen M. Salsbury # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2008 Abstract Our study focuses on the spatial ecology and seasonal habitat use of two aquatic turtles in order to understand the manner in which upland habitat use by humans shapes the aquatic activity, movement, and habitat selection of these species in an urban setting. We used radiotelemetry to follow 15 female Graptemys geographica (common map turtle) and each of ten male and female Trachemys scripta (red-eared slider) living in a man-made canal within a highly urbanized region of Indianapolis, IN, USA. During the active season (between May and September) of 2002, we located 33 of the 35 individuals a total of 934 times and determined the total range of activity, mean movement, and daily movement for each individuals. We also analyzed turtle locations relative to the upland habitat types (commercial, residential, river, road, woodlot, and open) surrounding the canal and determined that the turtles spent a disproportionate amount of time in woodland and commercial habitats and avoided the road-associated portions of the canal. We also located 21 of the turtles during hibernation (February 2003), and determined that an even greater proportion of individuals hibernated in woodland-bordered portions of the canal. Our results clearly indicate that turtle habitat selection is influenced by human activities; sound conservation and management of turtle populations in urban habitats will require the incorporation of spatial ecology and habitat use data.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON MAP TURTLE Scientific Name: Graptemys Geographica Le
    Common Name: COMMON MAP TURTLE Scientific Name: Graptemys geographica Le Sueur Other Commonly Used Names: none Previously Used Scientific Names: none Family: Emydidae Rarity Ranks: G5/S1 State Legal Status: Rare Federal Legal Status: none Description: Like other species of map turtles, the common map turtle exhibits strong sexual dimorphism in both total size and head size. While males reach a carapace length of only 15 cm (6 inches), females may attain a carapace length of up to 27 cm (10½ inches). In addition, females have a much broader head than do males. The carapace is olive-green, with fine, lighter green or yellow lines that form a reticulated pattern, similar in appearance to the contour lines of a topographic map. A low, vertebral keel is present, though not nearly as prominent as the keel found on other species of map turtles. Absent on adult females, low vertebral spines may be evident on the posterior portion of the carapace in both juveniles and adult males. The cream to yellow plastron is unmarked in adults, though the bridge and lower marginal scutes have longitudinal dark lines and circular dark markings, respectively. The skin is olive to dark-brown or black with many narrow yellow to light green stripes. Behind each eye is a small yet distinctive yellow spot, not connected to any of the stripes. Juveniles have dark markings along the seams of the plastron and a more intricate carapace pattern. Similar Species: Common map turtles may be found in association with Alabama map turtles (Graptemys pulchra) within the Coosa River drainage, but the latter can be distinguished by their prominent spiny keel on the carapace (except old adult females) and the large yellow or light-green blotch present on the head between and behind the eyes.
    [Show full text]
  • In AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): Species in Red = Depleted to the Point They May Warrant Federal Endangered Species Act Listing
    Southern and Midwestern Turtle Species Affected by Commercial Harvest (in AR, FL, GA, IA, KY, LA, MO, OH, OK, SC, TN, and TX): species in red = depleted to the point they may warrant federal Endangered Species Act listing Common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) – AR, GA, IA, KY, MO, OH, OK, SC, TX Florida common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina osceola) - FL Southern painted turtle (Chrysemys dorsalis) – AR Western painted turtle (Chrysemys picta) – IA, MO, OH, OK Spotted turtle (Clemmys gutatta) - FL, GA, OH Florida chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia chrysea) – FL Western chicken turtle (Deirochelys reticularia miaria) – AR, FL, GA, KY, MO, OK, TN, TX Barbour’s map turtle (Graptemys barbouri) - FL, GA Cagle’s map turtle (Graptemys caglei) - TX Escambia map turtle (Graptemys ernsti) – FL Common map turtle (Graptemys geographica) – AR, GA, OH, OK Ouachita map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis) – AR, GA, OH, OK, TX Sabine map turtle (Graptemys ouachitensis sabinensis) – TX False map turtle (Graptemys pseudogeographica) – MO, OK, TX Mississippi map turtle (Graptemys pseuogeographica kohnii) – AR, TX Alabama map turtle (Graptemys pulchra) – GA Texas map turtle (Graptemys versa) - TX Striped mud turtle (Kinosternon baurii) – FL, GA, SC Yellow mud turtle (Kinosternon flavescens) – OK, TX Common mud turtle (Kinosternon subrubrum) – AR, FL, GA, OK, TX Alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii) – AR, FL, GA, LA, MO, TX Diamond-back terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) – FL, GA, LA, SC, TX River cooter (Pseudemys concinna) – AR, FL,
    [Show full text]
  • Water with Mollusks to Eat
    JUNE 2019 • W ATER LOG 39:2 3 Lawsuit Threatened after ESA Protection Stalls for Mississippi Turtle Kristina Alexander In 2010, an environmental group filed a petition with Pearl River vs. Pascagoula Map Turtles the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) to protect 404 Map turtles (the genus Graptemys ) are sometimes called Southeast aquatic plants and animals under the sawbacks because they have ridges down their backs, often Endangered Species Act (ESA). In 2011, FWS issued its forming little spikes. They are not big turtles, although 90-day finding under the act, finding that the petition female Pearl River map turtles grow almost two-times as demonstrated substantial scientific information that big as the males’ maximum carapace length of 5 inches. listing 374 of those 404 species was warranted. Some of Map turtles have simple needs: sandbars for nesting, those species had been brought to FWS’s attention for snags for basking, and clean water with mollusks to eat. protection as early as 1975. However, one species was not The Pearl River map turtle’s exclusive habitat is the 444- singled out until 2018. That species is the Pearl River map mile Pearl River (see map) . The Pearl River map turtle turtle ( Graptemys pearlensis ) of Mississippi. 1 shares this habitat with the ringed map turtle, which is a 4JUNE 2019 • W ATER LOG 39:2 threatened species under the ESA. In 1990, FWS issued a The ESA allows people to sue FWS if the agency conservation plan for the ringed map turtle, protecting 12 misses deadlines. FWS frequently misses them, in no miles of the Pearl River north of the Ross Barnett small part due to the limited budgets Congress authorizes reservoir.
    [Show full text]
  • Graptemys Geographica), and Sympatric Invasive Red-Eared Slider Turtles (Trachemys Scripta Elegans), in the Upper Niagara River Brian E
    State University of New York College at Buffalo - Buffalo State College Digital Commons at Buffalo State Biology Theses Biology 8-2015 Home Range, Habitat Use, and Movements of Native Northern Map Turtles (Graptemys geographica), and Sympatric Invasive Red-Eared Slider Turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans), in the Upper Niagara River Brian E. Haas State University of New York College at Buffalo, [email protected] Advisor Edward Standora, PhD First Reader Harold W. Avery, PhD Second Reader Christopher Pennuto, PhD Third Reader Robert Warren, PhD Department Chair I. Martha Skerrett, PhD To learn more about the Biology Department and its educational programs, research, and resources, go to http://biology.buffalostate.edu/. Recommended Citation Haas, Brian E., "Home Range, Habitat Use, and Movements of Native Northern Map Turtles (Graptemys geographica), and Sympatric Invasive Red-Eared Slider Turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans), in the Upper Niagara River" (2015). Biology Theses. 16. http://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/biology_theses/16 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/biology_theses Part of the Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Biology Commons Home range, habitat use, and movements of native northern map turtles (Graptemys geographica), and sympatric invasive red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans), in the Upper Niagara River by Brian Haas An Abstract of a Thesis in Biology Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts August 2015 Buffalo State College State University of New York Department of Biology 2 ABSTRACT OF THESIS Home range, habitat use, and movements of native northern map turtles (Graptemys geographica), and sympatric invasive red-eared slider turtles (Trachemys scripta elegans), in the Upper Niagara River Turtle populations throughout the world are in decline due to the effects associated with anthropogenic disturbances.
    [Show full text]
  • Turtles of the Upper Mississippi River System
    TURTLES OF THE UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER SYSTEM Tom R. Johnson and Jeffrey T. Briggler Herpetologists Missouri Department of Conservation Jefferson City, MO March 27, 2012 Background: A total of 13 species and subspecies of turtles are known to live in the Upper Mississippi River, its backwaters and tributaries. There are a few species that could be found occasionally, but would likely account for less than 5% of the species composition of any area. These species are predominantly marsh animals and are discussed in a separate section of this paper. For additional information on turtle identification and natural history see Briggler and Johnson (2006), Christiansen and Bailey (1988), Conant and Collins (1998), Ernst and Lovich (2009), Johnson (2000), and Vogt (1981). This information is provided to the fisheries field staff of the LTRM project so they will be able to identify the turtles captured during fish monitoring. The most current taxonomic information of turtles was used to compile this material. The taxonomy followed in this publication is the Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles of North America North of Mexico, with comments regarding confidence in our understanding (6th edition) by Crothers (2008). Species Identification, Natural History and Distribution: What follows is a synopsis of the 13 turtle species and subspecies which are known to occur in the Upper Mississippi River environs. Species composition changes between the upper and lower reaches of the LTRM study area (Wisconsin/Minnesota state line and southeastern Missouri) due to changes in aquatic habitats. For example, the Northern Map Turtle (Graptemys geographica) is abundant in the northern portion of the river with clearer water and abundant snail prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Map Turtles Complaint
    Case 1:20-cv-00146 Document 1 Filed 01/21/20 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________________ ) CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL ) DIVERSITY, ) 378 North Main Avenue, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-146 Tucson, AZ 85701 ) ) COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY HEALTHY GULF, ) AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 935 Gravier Street, Ste. 700 ) New Orleans, LA 70112 ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official ) capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department ) of Interior; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ) INTERIOR; AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her ) official capacity as Director of U.S. Fish and ) Wildlife Service; U.S. FISH AND ) WILDLIFE SERVICE, ) ) 1849 C Street NW ) Washington, DC 20240 ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) I. INTRODUCTION 1. In this civil action for declaratory and injunctive relief, the Center for Biological Diversity (Center) and Healthy Gulf challenge the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) failure to comply with the nondiscretionary deadlines set forth in the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531–1544. Specifically, the Service failed to determine whether the Pascagoula map turtle (Graptemys gibbonsi) and Pearl River map turtle (Graptemys pearlensis) warrant Case 1:20-cv-00146 Document 1 Filed 01/21/20 Page 2 of 15 protection as endangered or threatened under the Endangered Species Act within the congressionally mandated timeline set forth in Section 4 of the Act, Id. § 1533(b)(3). This failure delays crucial, lifesaving protections for these rare turtles that now suffer an even greater risk of extinction because of the Service’s delay. 2. The Pascagoula map turtle is endemic to the Pascagoula river system in Mississippi.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibians and Reptiles of United States Department of Defense Installations
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 13(3):652–661. Submitted: 20 December 2017; Accepted: 22 August 2018; Published: 16 December 2018. AmphibiAns And Reptiles of United stAtes depARtment of defense instAllAtions Christopher e. petersen1, robert e. LoviCh2,3, and sarah staLLings1 1Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic, 6506 Hampton Boulevard, Norfolk, Virginia 23508, USA 2Naval Facilities Engineering Command Southwest, 1220 Pacifc Highway, San Diego, California 92132, USA 3Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.—The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) occupies approximately 10.1 million ha of land within the U.S. spanning most ecosystems contained therein. To date, no comprehensive agency-wide inventory of amphibian and reptile species has been compiled. We developed an amphibian and reptile species inventory for 415 DoD installations/sites and evaluated species diversity. The amphibian and reptile species confrmed present on DoD sites represent 66% of the total native species documented in the continental U.S. Snakes are the most widespread group found on DoD lands. Of the military services, Army sites have the greatest number of confrmed species, federally listed, state-listed, and At-risk species. There are 24 federally listed (threatened or endangered), 55 state- listed, and 70 At-risk species confrmed present on DoD sites. Thirty non-native and native transplant amphibian and reptile species/subspecies are also confrmed present on DoD sites. Lastly, we verifed that approximately half of the military sites evaluated in this study have at least one venomous snake species confrmed present. Our study results assist directly with ongoing management and conservation of amphibian and reptile species on DoD lands and confrm military lands comprise a signifcant contribution to biodiversity conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing Wood Turtle (Glyptemys Insculpta) Home Range
    University of Northern Iowa UNI ScholarWorks Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate College 2017 Factors influencing wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) home range size in Iowa: A comparison between suburban and rural populations Joshua Gregory Otten University of Northern Iowa Copyright ©2017 Joshua Gregory Otten Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd Part of the Zoology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits oy u Recommended Citation Otten, Joshua Gregory, "Factors influencing wood turtle (Glyptemys insculpta) home range size in Iowa: A comparison between suburban and rural populations" (2017). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 466. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/etd/466 This Open Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at UNI ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNI ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACTORS INFLUENCING WOOD TURTLE (GLYPTEMYS INSCULPTA) HOME RANGE SIZE IN IOWA: A COMPARISON BETWEEN SUBURBAN AND RURAL POPULATIONS An Abstract of a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Joshua Gregory Otten University of Northern Iowa December 2017 ABSTRACT Home range size, movement patterns, and site fidelity of wood turtles (Glyptemys insculpta) were compared between a suburban population in Black Hawk County (BH) and a rural population in Butler County (BC), Iowa. Approximately 89% of individuals captured for studies conducted in Iowa during 2014 and 2015 were >14 years old. 45 individuals (22 females, 18 males, and 5 juveniles) were used for radio telemetry surveys in 2014–2015, 24 of which were located in BC, and 21 at BH.
    [Show full text]
  • CHELONIAN CONSERVATION and BIOLOGY International Journal of Turtle and Tortoise Research
    CHELONIAN CONSERVATION AND BIOLOGY International Journal of Turtle and Tortoise Research Genetic and Morphological Variation Between Populations of the Pascagoula Map Turtle (Graptemys gibbonsi) in the Pearl and Pascagoula Rivers with Description of a New Species 1,2 2 1 1 1 JOSHUA R. ENNEN ,JEFFREY E. LOVICH ,BRIAN R. KREISER ,W.SELMAN , AND CARL P. Q UALLS 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406 USA [[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]]; 2US Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Northern Arizona University, Applied Research and Development Building, PO Box 5614, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 USA [[email protected]] Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 2010, 9(1): 98–113 g 2010 Chelonian Research Foundation Genetic and Morphological Variation Between Populations of the Pascagoula Map Turtle (Graptemys gibbonsi) in the Pearl and Pascagoula Rivers with Description of a New Species 1,2 2 1 1 1 JOSHUA R. ENNEN ,JEFFREY E. LOVICH ,BRIAN R. KREISER ,W.SELMAN , AND CARL P. Q UALLS 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, Mississippi 39406 USA [[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]]; 2US Geological Survey, Southwest Biological Science Center, Northern Arizona University, Applied Research and Development Building, PO Box 5614, Flagstaff, Arizona 86011 USA [[email protected]] ABSTRACT. – Cryptic or undescribed species pose a major problem in conservation biology. Managing multiple unresolved taxa collectively as a single entity could precipitate the loss of unrecognized genetic variation and unique populations and, possibly, lead to extinction of undiscovered or unrecognized taxa.
    [Show full text]
  • Setting the Stage for Understanding Globalization of the Asian Turtle Trade
    Setting the Stage for Understanding Globalization of the Asian Turtle Trade: Global, Asian, and American Turtle Diversity, Richness, Endemism, and IUCN Red List Threat Levels Anders G.J. Rhodin and Peter Paul van Dijk IUCN Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group, Chelonian Research Foundation, Conservation International Thursday, January 20, 2011 New Species Described 2010 Photo C. Hagen Graptemys pearlensis - Pearl River Map Turtle Louisiana and Mississippi, USA Red List: Not Evaluated [Endangered] Thursday, January 20, 2011 IUCN/SSC Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group Founded 1980 www.iucn-tftsg.org Thursday, January 20, 2011 International Union for the Conservation of Nature / Species Survival Commission www.iucn.org Thursday, January 20, 2011 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Fauna and Flora www.cites.org Thursday, January 20, 2011 Chelonian Conservation and Biology Thomson Reuters’ ISI Journal Citation Impact Factor currently ranks CCB among the top 100 zoology journals worldwide www.chelonianjournals.org Thursday, January 20, 2011 Conservation Biology of Freshwater Turtles and Tortoises www.iucn-tftsg.org/cbftt Thursday, January 20, 2011 IUCN Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Specialist Group Members: Work or Focus - 2010 274 Members - 107 Countries Thursday, January 20, 2011 Species, Additional Subspecies, and Total Taxa of Turtles and Tortoises 500 Species Add. Subspecies 375 Total Taxa 250 125 0 1758176617831789179218011812183518441856187318891909193419551961196719771979198619891992199420062007200820092010 Currently Recognized: 334 species, 127 add. subspecies, 461 total taxa Thursday, January 20, 2011 Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Species Richness Buhlmann, Akre, Iverson, Karapatakis, Mittermeier, Georges, Rhodin, van Dijk, and Gibbons. 2009. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 8:116–149. Thursday, January 20, 2011 Tortoise and Freshwater Turtle Species Richness – Global Rankings 1.
    [Show full text]