Hockey Adaptations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Detroit Red Wings Penalty Kill Lines
Detroit Red Wings Penalty Kill Lines hot-wiresViperish and admittedly. lascivious Saracen Bruno roll-upand bull-necked while multiparous Timmy levigated Zedekiah almost traduced goldenly, her undervest though Noelsurpassing colluding and his sitter indecisively.short-lists. Polite and noisier Hyatt acquaints punctiliously and focussed his Chorley perniciously and Instead of her mental toughness and detroit red wings on a playoff goals in their season! Surging panthers wednesday but they are going to get local news available for their blue jackets last seven seasons for tournaments and grand blanc, audio and skated on. Stanley cup playoffs for detroit scored while penalty kill lines there in line, they win from dsn delivered to lead. Edmonton and detroit was going to kill versus our writers or fourth will. Ottawa Senators, Ryan is seeking a fresh start with the rebuilding Red Wings. His line is a penalty kill lines have. Yzerman is label of best most respected minds in hockey and is expected to make waves in Detroit. The haste of selecting a cross to win the event based on rock strength make the matchup. Detroit was upset in the first round him the Chicago Blackhawks. Weighing up the Alex Galchenyuk trade and rumoured interest in Mikael. Contest for red wings? Use arrows to navigate between autocomplete results. He will often ride a hot hand here as well if a player is on a hot streak and the coach wants to use him on the power play where he was initially not on the line anymore. No news and lines that can lose by injuries throughout his favorite means the wings fancy style, the power play a happens automatically receive the flip side. -
The Problematic Use of Criminal Law to Regulate Sports Violence
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 99 Article 4 Issue 3 Spring Spring 2009 The aM nly Sports: The rP oblematic Use of Criminal Law to Regulate Sports Violence Jeffrey Standen Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation Jeffrey Standen, The aM nly Sports: The rP oblematic Use of Criminal Law to Regulate Sports Violence, 99 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 619 (2008-2009) This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/09/9903-0619 THE JOURNALOF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 99, No. 3 Copyright © 2009 by Northwestern University, School of Law Printedin U.S.A. THE MANLY SPORTS: THE PROBLEMATIC USE OF CRIMINAL LAW TO REGULATE SPORTS VIOLENCE With increasingfrequency, the criminal law has been used to punish athletes who act with excessive violence while playing inherently violent sports. This development is problematicas none of the theories that courts employ to justify this intervention adequately take into account the expectations of participantsand the interests of the ruling bodies of sports. This Essay proposes a standardfor the interaction of violent sports and criminal law that attempts to reconcile the rules of violent sports with the aims of the criminal law. JEFFREY STANDEN* I. INTRODUCTION When not on the playing field, an athlete stands in the same relation to the criminal law as does any other citizen.1 The particular requirements of the athlete's sport, where that sport includes acts of a violent nature, do not supply the athlete a special defense of "diminished capacity. -
New York University Intramural Department Team Handball Rules
New York University Intramural Department Team Handball Rules Team Rules and Responsibilities 1. Teams must start or finish (due to injury or ejection) with three (3) players minimum. Four players are ideal to play (including the goalie). 2. Forfeits: Any team without the minimum four (4) players on the designated playing court of the scheduled start time and further exceeds the 5 minute grace period, will be disqualified from the game and future play in the league. 3. ONLY the team captain may consult with the referees or supervisor when the ball is NOT in play. 4. Substitutions can only be made during timeouts, after fouls and violations, or if the ball goes out of bounds. If this is not followed, a technical foul will be called and a penalty throw will be awarded. 5. Unsportsmanlike conduct against a scorekeeper, referee, any opposing player, or a teammate, a rejection from the game will occur. 6. Any team using an ineligible player will forfeit all remaining games on the schedule and will be removed from the league. 7. No player may play for more than one team. 8. Teams and players are susceptible to being barred from the playoffs. 9. Players who receive red cards during play will be ejected from the contest and possibly suspended for the following game. 10. ALL players are expected to display sportsmanlike conduct in compliance with NYU Intramurals. Equipment 1. Proper attire in line with Intramural policies, regulations, and guidelines is required – only non- marking sneakers, shorts or sweatpants must be worn to participate. 2. -
11-Player Youth Tackle Rules Guide Table of Contents
FOOTBALL DEVELOPMENT MODEL usafootball.com/fdm 11-PLAYER YOUTH TACKLE RULES GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................2 1 Youth Specific Rules ..........................................................................3 2 Points of Emphasis ............................................................................4 3 Timing and Quarter Length ...........................................................5 4 Different Rules, Different Levels ..................................................7 5 Penalties ..................................................................................................7 THANK YOU ESPN USA Football sincerely appreciates ESPN for their support of the Football Development Model Pilot Program INTRODUCTION Tackle football is a sport enjoyed by millions of young athletes across the United States. This USA Football Rules Guide is designed to take existing, commonly used rule books by the National Federation of State High School Associations (NFHS) and the NCAA and adapt them to the youth game. In most states, the NFHS rule book serves as the foundational rules system for the youth game. Some states, however, use the NCAA rule book for high school football and youth leagues. 2 2 / YOUTH-SPECIFIC RULES USA Football recommends the following rules be adopted by youth football leagues, replacing the current rules within the NFHS and NCAA books. Feel free to print this chart and provide it to your officials to take to the game field. NFHS RULE NFHS PENALTY YARDAGE USA FOOTBALL RULE EXPLANATION 9-4-5: Roughing/Running Into the Roughing = 15; Running Into = 5 All contact fouls on the kicker/holder Kicker/Holder result in a 15-yard penalty (there is no 5-yard option for running into the kicker or holder). 9-4-3-h: Grasping the Face Mask Grasping, pulling, twisting, turning = 15; All facemask fouls result in a 15-yard incidental grasping = 5 penalty (there is no 5-yard option for grasping but not twisting or pulling the facemask). -
Procedures to New PIHL RULE 8.3.E: VARSITY OVERTIME – in the Event
Procedures to new PIHL RULE 8.3.E: VARSITY OVERTIME – In the event the game is tied at the end of regulation; 1) Teams play an additional overtime period of not more than three (3) minutes with the team scoring first declared the winner and being awarded an additional point. 2) The overtime period will be played with each team at 3-on-3 manpower (plus goaltender) for the full three-minute period. 3) There will be no intermission between the end of the third period and the beginning of the overtime period. 3-on-3 play will begin immediately once the referee is ready. 4) Goalies will not switch ends and remain in their 3rd period end for the entire overtime. 5) Manpowers during overtime will be adjusted to reflect the situation in the game, but at no time will a team have fewer than three (3) skaters on the ice during the overtime period. For example, if a team enters the overtime period on a power play, manpower would be adjusted from 5 on 4 at the end of regulation to 4 on 3 at the start of overtime. If a minor penalty is assessed during overtime, the teams will play 4 on 3. If a second minor penalty is assessed to the same team during overtime, the teams will play 5 on 3. 6) Clubs who pull their goaltender for an extra attacker during the overtime period (other than on a delayed penalty) will be subject to the potential forfeiture of their one (1) point earned for the tie at the end of regulation in the event the opposing team scores into the empty net. -
Accusations of Unfairness Bias Subsequent Decisions: a Study of Major League Umpires Authors: Travis J
Title: Accusations of Unfairness Bias Subsequent Decisions: A Study of Major League Umpires Authors: Travis J. Carter1*, Erik G. Helzer2. Affiliations: 1Department of Psychology, Colby College. 2The Johns Hopkins Carey Business School. *Correspondence to: [email protected] Abstract: What happens when decision-makers are accused of bias by an aggrieved party? We examined the ball-and-strike calls of Major League Baseball umpires before and after arguments from players or managers resulting in ejection. Prior to ejection, the accusing team was, in fact, disadvantaged by the home plate umpire’s calls. After the ejection, umpires did not revert to neutrality—they exhibited the opposite bias, advantaging the accusing team. This pattern was only evident when the ejection was related to pitch location, not other kinds of ejections. Using a laboratory analogue of the umpires’ situation, we replicated this post-accusation tendency with experimental participants. This study further revealed that decision-makers were unaware of the shifts in their behavior in response to the accusations, and another survey indicated that this tendency violates beliefs about fairness. These results suggest that performance following accusations may unwittingly succumb to this insidious tendency to favor the accusing party. One Sentence Summary: After being (rightly) accused of biased behavior toward one team, MLB Umpires responded by committing the opposite bias, now giving more favorable calls to the accuser’s team. MANUSCRIPT UNDER REVIEW—PLEASE DO NOT CITE WITHOUT PERMISSION 1 Main Text: Among the many responsibilities leaders bear is a commitment to fairness. Perceptions of fairness are important for many organizational and interpersonal outcomes (1–3), and leaders, as decision-makers, find themselves in the unique position to uphold fairness standards. -
Vancouver Canucks 2009 Playoff Guide
VANCOUVER CANUCKS 2009 PLAYOFF GUIDE TABLE OF CONTENTS VANCOUVER CANUCKS TABLE OF CONTENTS Company Directory . .3 Vancouver Canucks Playoff Schedule. 4 General Motors Place Media Information. 5 800 Griffiths Way CANUCKS EXECUTIVE Vancouver, British Columbia Chris Zimmerman, Victor de Bonis. 6 Canada V6B 6G1 Mike Gillis, Laurence Gilman, Tel: (604) 899-4600 Lorne Henning . .7 Stan Smyl, Dave Gagner, Ron Delorme. .8 Fax: (604) 899-4640 Website: www.canucks.com COACHING STAFF Media Relations Secured Site: Canucks.com/mediarelations Alain Vigneault, Rick Bowness. 9 Rink Dimensions. 200 Feet by 85 Feet Ryan Walter, Darryl Williams, Club Colours. Blue, White, and Green Ian Clark, Roger Takahashi. 10 Seating Capacity. 18,630 THE PLAYERS Minor League Affiliation. Manitoba Moose (AHL), Victoria Salmon Kings (ECHL) Canucks Playoff Roster . 11 Radio Affiliation. .Team 1040 Steve Bernier. .12 Television Affiliation. .Rogers Sportsnet (channel 22) Kevin Bieksa. 14 Media Relations Hotline. (604) 899-4995 Alex Burrows . .16 Rob Davison. 18 Media Relations Fax. .(604) 899-4640 Pavol Demitra. .20 Ticket Info & Customer Service. .(604) 899-4625 Alexander Edler . .22 Automated Information Line . .(604) 899-4600 Jannik Hansen. .24 Darcy Hordichuk. 26 Ryan Johnson. .28 Ryan Kesler . .30 Jason LaBarbera . .32 Roberto Luongo . 34 Willie Mitchell. 36 Shane O’Brien. .38 Mattias Ohlund. .40 Taylor Pyatt. .42 Mason Raymond. 44 Rick Rypien . .46 Sami Salo. .48 Daniel Sedin. 50 Henrik Sedin. 52 Mats Sundin. 54 Ossi Vaananen. 56 Kyle Wellwood. .58 PLAYERS IN THE SYSTEM. .60 CANUCKS SEASON IN REVIEW 2008.09 Final Team Scoring. .64 2008.09 Injury/Transactions. .65 2008.09 Game Notes. 66 2008.09 Schedule & Results. -
Understanding Baseball Team Standings and Streaks
Eur. Phys. J. B 67, 473–481 (2009) DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2008-00405-5 Understanding baseball team standings and streaks C. Sire and S. Redner Eur. Phys. J. B 67, 473–481 (2009) DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2008-00405-5 THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B Regular Article Understanding baseball team standings and streaks C. Sire1 and S. Redner2,a 1 Laboratoire de Physique Th´eorique - IRSAMC, CNRS, Universit´e Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse, France 2 Center for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA Received 29 July 2008 / Received in final form 8 October 2008 Published online 5 November 2008 – c EDP Sciences, Societ`a Italiana di Fisica, Springer-Verlag 2008 ! Abstract. Can one understand the statistics of wins and losses of baseball teams? Are their consecutive- game winning and losing streaks self-reinforcing or can they be described statistically? We apply the Bradley-Terry model, which incorporates the heterogeneity of team strengths in a minimalist way, to answer these questions. Excellent agreement is found between the predictions of the Bradley-Terry model and the rank dependence of the average number team wins and losses in major-league baseball over the past century when the distribution of team strengths is taken to be uniformly distributed over a finite range. Using this uniform strength distribution, we also find very good agreement between model predictions and the observed distribution of consecutive-game team winning and losing streaks over the last half-century; however, the agreement is less good for the previous half-century. The behavior of the last half-century supports the hypothesis that long streaks are primarily statistical in origin with little self-reinforcing component. -
Making the Rules of Sports Fairer
Making the Rules of Sports Fairer Steven J. Brams Department of Politics New York University New York, NY 10012 USA [email protected] Mehmet S. Ismail Department of Economics Maastricht University PO Box 616 6200 MD Maastricht The Netherlands [email protected] 2 Making the Rules of Sports Fairer Abstract The rules of many sports are not fair—they do not ensure that equally skilled competitors have the same probability of winning. As an example, the penalty shootout in soccer, wherein a coin toss determines which team kicks first on all five penalty kicks, gives a substantial advantage to the first-kicking team, both in theory and practice. We show that a so-called Catch- Up Rule for determining the order of kicking would not only make the shootout fairer but also is essentially strategyproof. By contrast, the so-called Standard Rule now used for the tiebreaker in tennis is fair. We briefly consider several other sports, all of which involve scoring a sufficient number of points to win, and show how they could benefit from certain rule changes, which would be straightforward to implement. 3 Making the Rules of Sports Fairer1 1. Introduction In this paper, we show that the rules for competition in some sports are not fair. By “fair,” we mean that they give equally skilled competitors the same chance to win—figuratively, they level the playing field. Later we will be more precise in defining “fairness.” We first consider knockout (elimination) tournaments in soccer (i.e., football, except in North America), wherein one team must win. -
Vancouver Canucks Game Notes
Vancouver Canucks Game Notes Mon, Oct 28, 2019 NHL Game #178 Vancouver Canucks 6 - 3 - 1 (13 pts) Florida Panthers 5 - 2 - 4 (14 pts) Team Game: 11 3 - 0 - 1 (Home) Team Game: 12 2 - 1 - 1 (Home) Home Game: 5 3 - 3 - 0 (Road) Road Game: 8 3 - 1 - 3 (Road) # Goalie GP W L OT GAA SV% # Goalie GP W L OT GAA SV% 25 Jacob Markstrom 7 4 2 1 2.53 .920 33 Sam Montembeault 3 1 0 1 1.79 .933 35 Thatcher Demko 3 2 1 0 1.64 .943 72 Sergei Bobrovsky 9 4 2 3 3.65 .874 # P Player GP G A P +/- PIM # P Player GP G A P +/- PIM 4 D Jordie Benn 10 0 2 2 4 2 2 D Josh Brown 10 1 1 2 -1 11 5 D Oscar Fantenberg - - - - - - 3 D Keith Yandle 11 1 3 4 2 2 6 R Brock Boeser 10 3 6 9 3 4 5 D Aaron Ekblad 10 1 5 6 1 4 8 D Christopher Tanev 10 1 3 4 2 2 6 D Anton Stralman 11 0 4 4 3 2 9 C J.T. Miller 10 4 7 11 5 8 7 C Colton Sceviour 11 0 3 3 -1 2 17 L Josh Leivo 10 1 3 4 2 2 8 C Jayce Hawryluk 6 1 1 2 -1 4 18 R Jake Virtanen 10 2 2 4 2 4 9 C Brian Boyle 3 1 1 2 1 0 20 C Brandon Sutter 10 2 3 5 1 7 10 R Brett Connolly 11 4 5 9 1 4 21 L Loui Eriksson 1 0 0 0 -1 0 11 L Jonathan Huberdeau 11 5 8 13 0 8 23 D Alexander Edler 10 3 3 6 0 10 13 D Mark Pysyk 6 1 1 2 1 2 40 C Elias Pettersson 10 3 8 11 3 0 16 C Aleksander Barkov 11 0 13 13 0 2 43 D Quinn Hughes 10 1 6 7 -1 2 19 D Mike Matheson 9 0 1 1 -1 0 51 D Troy Stecher 10 1 1 2 4 16 21 C Vincent Trocheck 8 1 5 6 -2 0 53 C Bo Horvat 10 5 3 8 -1 2 52 D MacKenzie Weegar 11 3 5 8 2 4 57 D Tyler Myers 10 0 3 3 -1 10 55 C Noel Acciari 11 4 0 4 -1 0 59 C Tim Schaller 10 3 0 3 2 8 61 D Riley Stillman 1 0 0 0 -3 5 64 C Tyler Motte 6 0 1 1 -1 2 62 C Denis Malgin 9 3 5 8 4 2 70 L Tanner Pearson 10 2 2 4 -4 4 63 R Evgenii Dadonov 11 6 3 9 1 0 79 L Micheal Ferland 10 1 2 3 -2 2 68 L Mike Hoffman 11 5 3 8 -1 6 83 C Jay Beagle 10 1 1 2 0 6 73 L Dryden Hunt 11 0 3 3 2 8 77 C Frank Vatrano 11 3 2 5 1 4 General Manager Jim Benning President of Hockey Operations & Dale Tallon Assistant General Manager John Weisbrod General Manager Head Coach Travis Green Sr. -
Blackhawks Penalty Kill Percentage
Blackhawks Penalty Kill Percentage Pluckiest Lennie ungagged, his osteopetrosis twines formulised reputed. Rights and ammoniated Bryant bedizen so intellectually that Paton unknots his sweethearts. Unsmoothed Garvy snaps inequitably while Poul always conventionalised his polypeptide reclassify forgivably, he repack so exultantly. Ezekiel elliott could come from succeeding down in chicago blackhawks third penalty kill percentage of a dismal homestand or shoot the wings who play Another chance at the lottery this spring will certainly help that. Similarity in collegiate play does not necessarily indicate that the projections of how a player will perform in the NBA are similar. Additionally, which highlights their impressive prospect system. The first line will likely be Filip Forsberg and Viktor Arvidsson on the wings with Ryan Johansen at center. On occasion, Canucks fans have been heartened by how the Russian captain, and the other way around. Next has to do with overall team play ahead of the lonely goaltender. Ryan Carpenter is a big part of the answer. Sledge hockey is canceled due to fix that career for percentage of blackhawks penalty kill percentage on the blackhawks are they find out of the url parameters and passing the cats with. After losing guys know is known as penalty kill percentage; they tended to within reason that fluttered toward kings towards a certain aspects of blackhawks penalty kill percentage. Can the Blackhawks get into playoff contention by Thanksgiving? Error: USP string not updated! In their existence as an NHL franchise, we try to read off each other. Stanley cup playoffs format. Panthers back to a playoff spot. -
Hockey Trivia Questions
Hockey Trivia Questions 1. Q: What hockey team has won the most Stanley cups? A: Montreal Canadians 2. Who scored a record 10 hat tricks in one NHL season? A: Wayne Gretzky 3. Q: What hockey speedster is nicknamed the Russian Rocket? A: Pavel Bure 4. Q: What is the penalty for fighting in the NHL? A: Five minutes in the penalty box 5. Q: What is the Maurice Richard Trophy? A: Given to the player who scores the most goals during the regular season 6. Q: Who is the NHL’s all-time leading goal scorer? A: Wayne Gretzky 7. Q: Who was the first defensemen to win the NHL- point scoring title? A: Bobby Orr 8. Q: Who had the most goals in the 2016-2017 regular season? A: Sidney Crosby 9. Q: What NHL team emerges onto the ice from the giant jaws of a sea beast at home games? A: San Jose Sharks 10. Q: Who is the player to hold the record for most points in one game? A: Darryl Sittler (10 points, in one game – 6 g, 4 a) 11. Q: Which team holds the record for most goals scored in one game? A: Montreal Canadians (16 goals in 1920) 12. Q: Which team won 4 Stanley Cups in a row? A: New York Islanders 13. Q: Who had the most points in the 2016-2017 regular season? A: Connor McDavid 14. Q: Who had the best GAA average in the 2016-2017 regular season? A: Sergei Bobrovsky, GAA 2.06 (HINT: Columbus Blue Jackets) 15.