Senedd Cymru (Welsh Parliament)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Senedd Cymru (Welsh Parliament) Published on The Institute for Government (https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk) Home > Senedd Cymru (Welsh parliament) Senedd Cymru (Welsh parliament) The Senedd Cymru (Welsh parliament) in Cardiff is the devolved legislature of Wales. It is unicameral, meaning that, unlike the UK parliament at Westminster, it has only has one chamber. Why was the Senedd created? Senedd Cymru was originally created as the National Assembly for Wales in 1999 as part of the Labour UK government’s plans to devolve power to Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Devolution to Wales was intended to make it so decisions on key services would be taken by “people directly elected by, and accountable to, Welsh voters”, and “above all else… provide a clear and distinctive voice for Wales”.[1] The creation of the Welsh assembly was approved in a referendum in 1997 (in parallel with a vote in Scotland) with a slim majority of 50.3% of votes cast in its favour, on a turnout of 51.3%. Previous proposals for a Welsh assembly had been defeated in a 1979 referendum, with 79.7% of votes cast against the proposals. The new assembly took on the executive functions previously held by the (central government) Welsh Office and had the power to make secondary legislation in those areas – that is, law created under powers given by specific acts of the UK parliament. But it did not initially have the power to pass primary legislation, which was a significant difference to the Scottish parliament created at the same time. What powers does the Senedd have? The Senedd has power to make laws over many key areas of Welsh life. These include most aspects of health and social care, housing, education, local transport, economic development, social services, language and culture, the environment, and local government. It has also had some tax-raising powers, including control of local taxes, taxes on property transactions (stamp duty land tax) and landfill, and the power to vary income tax rates in Wales. The Senedd has a more limited scope of powers than the Northern Ireland assembly and Scottish parliament. In particular, it has no power over policing and justice in Wales, which remain the responsibility of the UK government. How has devolution in Wales changed over time? Ron Davies, secretary of state for Wales when the National Assembly for Wales was created, described devolution as “a process, not an event”. This has certainly been the case in Wales, which has seen several acts of parliament increase its powers and law-making abilities (along with the other devolved institutions). The Government of Wales Act 2006 formally separated the legislature (the National Assembly for Wales) and the new executive (the Welsh Assembly government). The Assembly was also empowered to pass pieces of primary legislation known as ‘measures’, dependent on Westminster granting it the legislative power over a specific policy area on a case-by-case basis. In February 2010, assembly members voted in favour of a referendum on further law-making powers, for which the UK parliament passed enabling legislation. In March 2011, the new powers were approved with 63.5% of voters in favour, on a turnout of 35%. The Wales Act 2014 devolved fiscal powers to the Welsh assembly for the first time. This included devolving stamp duty, business rates and landfill tax, providing new capital borrowing powers for Welsh ministers, and providing for the devolution of a portion of income tax. The Wales Act 2017 made large changes to the devolution settlement for Wales. These included a change to a ‘reserved powers’ model of devolution, in which the default is that all policy areas are devolved unless explicitly excluded. The Act also devolved powers to Wales over elections, transport, energy, and the natural environment. The assembly was also given the power to change its own name. In November 2019, this power was exercised, as the assembly voted to change its name to bilingual Senedd Cymru or Welsh Parliament. This came into effect on 6 May 2020. How is the Welsh government funded? 1 The majority of the Welsh government’s funding comes from an annual block grant from the UK government calculated using the Barnett formula. Using last year’s block grant as a baseline the formula, the formula increases or decreases the Welsh block grant based on changes to spending in England on functions that are devolved, taking into account and population share. Following a 2016 deal with the UK government, Wales receives 105% of any spending increases in England, on a per-capita basis. So for example, if spending on health care in England increases by £100m, the Welsh government’s block grant would increase by £5.9m, since Wales’ population is 5.6% of England’s, and this is then multiplied by 105%. Although under the terms of the formula the Welsh need not also spend this sum on health care. The Welsh government also receives income from devolved taxes and a share of Welsh income tax revenue. In 2018, it was estimated that these covered around £5 billion in tax revenues, roughly a third of Welsh government spending at that time.[2] Which parties are currently represented in the Senedd? There are currently four political parties represented in the Senedd. The largest party is Welsh Labour, which holds 30 seats and has been in government since 1999. The next largest parties are the Welsh Conservatives and Plaid Cymru, with 16 and 13 members respectively. There is also one Liberal Democrat member, but Senedd rules means that the party does not have enough members to form a political group and be represented on committees. How do Senedd elections work? The Senedd is elected via a voting system known as the additional member system (AMS). Each voter has two votes; one is used to elect a constituency member to represent their local area. This part of the election uses the first-past-the-post counting method where the candidate with the most votes is elected – similar to UK general elections. The second vote is cast for a political party on a regional basis. Constituencies are grouped into five large regions which each elect four ‘top-up’ members to make the composition of the Senedd more proportional to overall vote share. This part of the election uses a special formula (the d’Hondt method) that takes into account the vote share for each party and balances this out against the number of seats already won in the constituency vote, to calculate the number of top-up seats each party is entitled to. Members are then chosen from a list drawn up by each party before the election, in order of preference. Distribution of seats per region in Senedd Cymru (Updated: 21 May 2021) [2] [3] [4] What happens after the Senedd elections? [5] Typically, the Senedd must meet within the period of seven days beginning immediately after the day of the poll (not including weekends). 2 However, the Welsh Elections (Coronavirus) Act 2021 has extended this deadline for the first meeting to 21 days after the election, requiring it to reconvene by 27 May. This is to provide some flexibility and cater for a potential delay in counting ballots and confirming results.[3] The Senedd reconvened on 17 May 2021, 11 days after the election. The Senedd was still required to nominate a first minister within 28 days of the election. This happened on 12 May 2021, six days after the election, when Welsh Labour leader Mark Drakeford was re-elected as First Minister. What has happened at previous Senedd elections? [6] Welsh Labour has been the biggest party in the Senedd since it was created, winning between 26 and 30 seats at every election since 1999. Labour has also been in government, either in coalition or alone, throughout the 22 years of devolution. At the 2021 election, Labour equalled its best performance, winning 30 seats for the third time. The Conservatives also achieved their best result in terms of both their share of the vote and seats, electing 16 members. Plaid Cymru won 13 seats, making a net gain of one seat on the last election, while the Lib Dems remained on one seat. None of the smaller parties – such as UKIP, Abolish the Assembly, and Propel – and independents which had held seats in the previous parliament were re-elected. Percentage of votes and seats won by parties in Senedd Cymru elections (Updated: 21 May 2021) [8] [9] [10] [1] Gay O, The Government of Wales Bill: Devolution and the National Assembly, 4 December 1997, https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/rp97-129/ [11] [2] Cabinet Office and Office of the Secretary of State for Wales, Devolution settlement: Wales, 20 February 2013, www.gov.uk/guidance/devolution-settlement-wales [12] [3] Welsh Government, Welsh Elections (Coronavirus) Bill, https://senedd.wales/media/kukp15ds/pri-ld14059-em- e.pdf [13] Update date: Friday, May 21, 2021 Copyright 2021 Institute for Government | Home | Privacy | Accessibility | Site map | Contact | Work for us The Institute is a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales No. 6480524 Registered Charity No. 1123926 Links [1] https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/file/welsh-distribution-seats-may-2021png [2] https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/charts/distribution-seats-senedd [3] https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Distribution of seats per region in Senedd 3 Cymru&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.instituteforgovernment.org.uk%2Fprintpdf%2F10420%23chart_1582799104&via=instituteforgov [4] https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/sites/default/files/chart-images/welsh-distribution-seats-may-2021.png [5] http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=What%20happens%20after%20the%20Senedd%20elections%3F
Recommended publications
  • Cabinet Office Consultation on 'Better Use of Data in Government
    Cabinet Office consultation on ‘Better use of data in government’ Response from the CLOSER Consortium CLOSER (Cohorts and Longitudinal Studies Enhancement Resources) is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and Medical Research Council (MRC) to maximise the use, value and impact of the UK’s longitudinal studies. The network brings together eight leading longitudinal studies, the British Library and the UK Data Archive. CLOSER’s response to the consultation predominantly reflects our interest in being able to link individual administrative records to longitudinal survey data collected from that same individual. The linking of these two forms of data offers potential that exceeds the sum of the two approaches in isolation. While administrative records can provide enviable coverage and frequency, they rarely provide the richness and depth that comes from survey data collected to tackle specific research questions; conversely, survey data collection can be costly and challenging to administer, leading to missing data and possible biases which can be overcome by using administrative records to fill in the missing information. Consequently, combining the two can yield considerable benefits. For example, recent analysis of the National Pupil Database (NPD) and Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) found higher participation rates in higher education among a range of groups including ethnic-minorities.1 However, those records could not help explain these differences in participation; exploring this required linking individual
    [Show full text]
  • Branches of the Bank of England
    BRANCHES OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND Origin of Soon after the foundation end of the year seventy-three of the more the branches of the Bank of England in important banks in England and Wales had 1694, an anonymous writer on financial matters suspended payment. suggested that the Bank should establish In January 1826, with bank failures and branches which would be able to remit"multi­ commercial bankruptcies still continuing, the tudes of sums, great and small, to and from Court of Directors appointed a Committee to place to place ...without charges of carriage or consider and report "how far it may be dangers of Robberie" (Proposals for National practicable to establish branch banks ". Banks, 1696). The theme was taken up again Although the Committee were primarily con­ in 1721 by a pamphleteer who advocated the cerned to prevent a recurrence of the difficulties opening of branches "in the trading places of the previous year, they clearly did not over­ of the nation" whose managers would have look commercial considerations. Perhaps it authority "to lend a little". Such advice was because the latter issue, at least, was met with little response. Apart from introducing reasonably clear-cut that the Committee were Bank Post Bills(a) in 1724, in an attempt to able to report in only a week that they favoured reduce the risks to the mails of highway rob­ t e setting up of branches which, they con­ b ry, the Bank were little concerned during the � � SIdered, would greatly increase the Bank's own eIghteenth century with developments in the note circulation, would give the Bank greater financial system outside London and indeed control over the whole paper circulation, and were then frequently referred to as the ' Bank would protect the Bank against competition if of London '.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Issue
    Scottish Left Review Issue 79 November/December 2013 £2.00 Comment Scottish Left Review Issue 79 November/December 2013 t is difficult to maintain constitutional Ineutrality at this tail-end of 2013. Of course we will continue to do our best to keep the SLR open as a space for Contents anyone on the Scottish left, a place where they can feel at home and contribute Comment .......................................................2 to a debate that stretches beyond the boundaries of party or constitutional Democracy in writing ....................................4 position. That is our duty as a magazine Jean Urquhart created expressly for that purpose. Solid foundations for change .........................6 But the duty lies not only on us to Michael Keating keep that space open but on all sides to fill that space. Because it can surely not Our share of the future ..................................8 be possible for us to face the desolation Robin McAlpine which lies across Scottish society in the dog-days of this unlucky year without Graveyard or get-together ..........................10 some sort of answer to what lies all Isobel Lindsay around us. Welfare Nation State ...................................12 What answer to Grangemouth? John McInally Facile talk of ‘the need to work together’ is an insult to the collective intelligence. Labour and the trade unions .......................14 All it states is that if we keep the fork Gregor Gall, Richard Leonard, Bob Crow and let others keep the knife, it will be impossible for us to eat on our own. That Real energy answers ...................................18 may not be a bad thing, but someone Andy Cumbers needs to explain why.
    [Show full text]
  • June 2020 Leaders
    Our latest Welsh Political Barometer poll repeated our long-standing question in which we asked respondents to rate political leaders on a 0-10 scale (where 0 means ‘strongly dislike’ and 10 means ‘strongly like’, with a Don’t Know option also available.) This question was asked about the main Britain-wide leaders for the Conservatives and Labour, plus the Welsh leaders of both those parties and Plaid Cymru. With our April poll having begun sampling before the Labour leadership announcement, our new poll thus present the first verdict from Welsh voters on Sir Keir Starmer - and allows us to compare his ratings directly with those of Jeremy Corbyn. As I have often discussed in the past, a first interesting thing in such findings is the proportion of people who answer Don’t Know for each leader. Though some respondents will choose this option because they are genuinely undecided – and some will bluff on a leader about whom they know nothing – overall the percentage of people saying Don’t Know provides a good rough-and-ready measure of their public visibility. There are at least two particular reasons for being interested in that this time around. As this is the first poll asking about Keir Starmer, it is interesting to see the extent to which the public have been able yet to form a view about him. Second, it has been no- table since he became First Minister that large proportions of Barometer respondents have failed to offer a view on Mark Drakeford; with the Covid-19 crisis having pushed him rather more into the public eye, has this changed? The table below shows the percentage of Don't Know responses for each leader (with in brackets the change on our last poll, in April; for Starmer, the figure represents the change on the April fig- ure for Corbyn): Leader % Don’t Know Boris Johnson 5 (-2) Keir Starmer 25 (+16) Mark Drakeford 24 (-16) Paul Davies 67 (+3) Adam Price 55 (+1) These sorts of tables normally show a gulf between the two main UK party leaders and those at the devolved level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Importance of the Welsh Language in Wales's Cultural Independence Within the United Kingdom
    The role and importance of the Welsh language in Wales’s cultural independence within the United Kingdom Sylvain Scaglia To cite this version: Sylvain Scaglia. The role and importance of the Welsh language in Wales’s cultural independence within the United Kingdom. Linguistics. 2012. dumas-00719099 HAL Id: dumas-00719099 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-00719099 Submitted on 19 Jul 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. UNIVERSITE DU SUD TOULON-VAR FACULTE DES LETTRES ET SCIENCES HUMAINES MASTER RECHERCHE : CIVILISATIONS CONTEMPORAINES ET COMPAREES ANNÉE 2011-2012, 1ère SESSION The role and importance of the Welsh language in Wales’s cultural independence within the United Kingdom Sylvain SCAGLIA Under the direction of Professor Gilles Leydier Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................. 1 WALES: NOT AN INDEPENDENT STATE, BUT AN INDEPENDENT NATION ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bread and Butter Actions to Solve Poverty Listening to People 2Nd
    Spring 2019 Wales’ best policy and politics magazine Bread and butter actions to solve poverty Mark Drakeford AM Listening to people Suzy Davies AM 2nd home tax loophole Siân Gwenllian AM ISSN 2059-8416 Print ISSN 2398-2063 Online CONTENTS: SPRING 2019 Wales’ best policy and politics magazine 50.open.ac.uk A unique space in the heart of Cardiff for everything connected with your wellbeing. 50 MLYNEDD O 50 YEARS OF Created by Gofal, the charity thinking differently about YSBRYDOLIAETH INSPIRATION mental health. Wedi’i seilio ar ei chred gadarn sef y dylai addysg fod yn Dedicated Workplace Wellbeing Programmes agored i bawb, mae’r Brifysgol Agored wedi treulio’r hanner A team of professional counsellors with a range of approaches canrif ddiwethaf yn helpu dysgwyr ledled Cymru a’r byd i droi’r Employee Assistant Programmes offering quality support amhosibl yn bosibl. Yn ystod carreg filltir ein pen-blwydd yn 50 oed, rydym yn creu rhaglen o ddigwyddiadau a gweithgareddau cyrous a fydd yn All profits will be reinvested into Gofal - amlygu’r myfyrwyr, sta, partneriaid a theulu’r Brifysgol sustainable wellbeing for all Agored sydd wedi gwneud ein sefydliad yr hyn ydyw heddiw. Mark Drakeford AM Alicja Zalesinska Alun Michael Company Number: 2546880 2 Solving poverty in Wales 10 Housing is a human right 18 The challenge of austerity Registered in England and Wales Registered Charity Number: 1000889 Founded on the firm belief that education should be open to to policing all, The Open University has spent the past fifty years helping learners from all over Wales and the world to make the impossible possible.
    [Show full text]
  • 88 Regionalism and Regionalisation Inn the United Kingdom
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Regionalism after regionalisation : Spain, France and the United Kingdom Schrijver, F.J. Publication date 2006 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Schrijver, F. J. (2006). Regionalism after regionalisation : Spain, France and the United Kingdom. Vossiuspers. http://nl.aup.nl/books/9789056294281-regionalism-after- regionalisation.html General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 88 Regionalism and regionalisation inn the United Kingdom Thee different constituent parts of the United Kingdom, Scotland, Wales, Englandd and Northern Ireland, each with their own characteristics, are well- known,, if only through their separate participation at football or rugby tour- naments.. Still, until very recendy none of those regions had a regional gov- ernmentt or regional elections, and the United Kingdom was among the most centralisedd states in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Report 01-13 to the Assembly Under Standing Order 22.9
    Standards of Conduct Committee Report 01-13 to the Assembly under Standing Order 22.9 March 2013 The National Assembly for Wales is the democratically elected body that represents the interests of Wales and its people, makes laws for Wales and holds the Welsh Government to account. An electronic copy of this report can be found on the National Assembly’s website: www.assemblywales.org Copies of this report can also be obtained in accessible formats including Braille, large print; audio or hard copy from: Standards of Conduct Committee National Assembly for Wales Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA Tel: 029 2082 1821 Fax: 029 2089 8021 Email: [email protected] © National Assembly for Wales Commission Copyright 2013 The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the National Assembly for Wales Commission and the title of the document specified. Standards of Conduct Committee Report 01-13 to the Assembly under Standing Order 22.9 March 2013 Standards of Conduct Committee The Standards Committee was established on 22 June 2011. The Committee’s role is to carry out the functions set out in Standing Order 22. These include: the investigation of complaints referred to it by the Standards Commissioner; consideration of any matters of principle relating to the conduct of Members; establishing procedures for the investigation of complaints, and arrangements for the Register of Members’ interests and other relevant public records determined by Standing Orders.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Statement
    COPYRIGHT STATEMENT This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. i ii REX WHISTLER (1905 – 1944): PATRONAGE AND ARTISTIC IDENTITY by NIKKI FRATER A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth in partial fulfilment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Humanities & Performing Arts Faculty of Arts and Humanities September 2014 iii Nikki Frater REX WHISTLER (1905-1944): PATRONAGE AND ARTISTIC IDENTITY Abstract This thesis explores the life and work of Rex Whistler, from his first commissions whilst at the Slade up until the time he enlisted for active service in World War Two. His death in that conflict meant that this was a career that lasted barely twenty years; however it comprised a large range of creative endeavours. Although all these facets of Whistler’s career are touched upon, the main focus is on his work in murals and the fields of advertising and commercial design. The thesis goes beyond the remit of a purely biographical stance and places Whistler’s career in context by looking at the contemporary art world in which he worked, and the private, commercial and public commissions he secured. In doing so, it aims to provide a more comprehensive account of Whistler’s achievement than has been afforded in any of the existing literature or biographies. This deeper examination of the artist’s practice has been made possible by considerable amounts of new factual information derived from the Whistler Archive and other archival sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidences Submitted by Paul Evans and Paul Silk*(TTC 03) Summary This Paper Responds to the Procedure Committee's Call
    Written evidences submitted by Paul Evans and Paul Silk*(TTC 03) Summary This paper responds to the Procedure Committee’s call for evidence in its inquiry into the procedure of the House of Commons and the territorial constitution. It proposes: The establishment of a permanent inter-parliamentary Body comprised of Members of the four UK legislatures to hold to account the Joint Ministerial Committee or any successor UK intergovernmental organisation. Changes to the standing orders of the House of Commons to enable joint working between all its committees and committees of the UK’s devolved legislatures. Rethinking the role of the territorial Grand Committees, and the establishment of an English Grand Committee to consider legislative consent motions relating to matters relating exclusively to England. A radical simplification of the standing orders relating to English Votes for English Laws. Integration of procedures relating to the operation of the Sewel Convention into the mainstream of the House’s legislative procedures. Other measures to enhance interparliamentary co-operation between Members of the UK’s legislatures. We note that on 6 November the Committee announced its intention of focussing its inquiries on the procedural steps necessary to facilitate greater joint working between House of Commons committees and the relevant committees of other UK legislatures to ensure effective scrutiny of common frameworks. While the scrutiny of the common frameworks provides an immediate impetus for better interparliamentary co-operation, we consider that this should be the launching pad for enhanced and deeper interparliamentary working in the longer term. ___________________________ *Paul Evans CBE is a former Clerk of Committees in the House of Commons.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Explanatory Memorandum to the Land Transaction Tax (Transitional
    Explanatory Memorandum to The Land Transaction Tax (Transitional Provisions) (Wales) Regulations 2018 This Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared by the Office of the First Minister and Cabinet Office of the Welsh Government and is laid before the National Assembly for Wales in conjunction with the above subordinate legislation and in accordance with Standing Order 27.1. Cabinet Secretary’s Declaration In my view, this Explanatory Memorandum gives a fair and reasonable view of the expected impact of the Land Transaction Tax (Transitional Provisions) (Wales) Regulations 2018. I am satisfied that the benefits justify the likely costs. Mark Drakeford AM – Cabinet Secretary for Finance 8 January 2018 1 1. Description 1.1 These Regulations make transitional provisions in respect of the introduction of land transaction tax (“LTT”) in Wales by the Land Transaction Tax and Anti-avoidance of Devolved Taxes (Wales) Act 2017 (“the LTTA Act”). The provisions ensure that transactions which take place on or after 1 April 2018 receive treatment which is consistent, meaning that transactions are not taxed twice under LTT and Stamp Duty Land Tax (“SDLT”), or not taxed at all. The Regulations also ensure that arrangements commenced prior to 1 April 2018 and for which certain reliefs (which exist in both regimes) were claimed will continue to be relieved under LTT (subject to certain conditions being met). The Regulations will also provide for transitional rules for the purposes of determining whether a transaction completed on or before 26 November 2018 is a higher rates residential property transaction where a person‘s main residence is being replaced.
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into the Implementation of the Wales Act 2014 and Operation of the Fiscal Framework
    Welsh Parliament Finance Committee Inquiry into the implementation of the Wales Act 2014 and operation of the Fiscal Framework February 2021 www.senedd.wales The Welsh Parliament is the democratically elected body that represents the interests of Wales and its people. Commonly known as the Senedd, it makes laws for Wales, agrees Welsh taxes and holds the Welsh Government to account. An electronic copy of this document can be found on the Welsh Parliament website: www.senedd.wales/SeneddFinance Copies of this document can also be obtained in accessible formats including Braille, large print, audio or hard copy from: Finance Committee Welsh Parliament Cardiff Bay CF99 1SN Tel: 0300 200 6565 Email: [email protected] Twitter: @SeneddFinance © Senedd Commission Copyright 2020 The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the Senedd Commission and the title of the document specified. Welsh Parliament Finance Committee Inquiry into the implementation of the Wales Act 2014 and operation of the Fiscal Framework February 2021 www.senedd.wales About the Committee The Committee was established on 22 June 2016. Its remit can be found at: www.senedd.wales/SeneddFinance Committee Chair: Llyr Gruffydd MS Plaid Cymru Current Committee membership: Alun Davies MS Siân Gwenllian MS Welsh Labour Plaid Cymru Mike Hedges MS Mark Isherwood MS Welsh Labour Welsh Conservatives Mark Reckless MS Rhianon Passmore MS Abolish the Welsh Assembly Welsh Labour Party The following Member attended as a substitute during this inquiry.
    [Show full text]