The Impact of Infrared Beak Treatment on the Production, Behaviour, and Welfare of Layer Pullets and Hens
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The impact of infrared beak treatment on the production, behaviour, and welfare of layer pullets and hens A Thesis Submitted to the College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon, SK, Canada Submitted by Sarah Struthers Copyright Sarah Struthers, September 2018. All rights reserved. Permission to Use In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the Libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or in part, for scholarly purposes may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work, or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis work was done. It is understood that any copying or publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and to the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Requests for permission to copy or make use of material in this thesis in whole or in part should be addressed to: Head of the Department of Animal and Poultry Science University of Saskatchewan, 6D34 Agriculture Building, 51 Campus Drive Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5A8 OR Dean College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan 107 Administration Place Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada S7N 5A2 i Disclaimer Reference in this thesis/dissertation to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favouring by the University of Saskatchewan. The views and opinions of the author expressed herein do not state or reflect those of the University of Saskatchewan, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. ii Overall Abstract Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of infrared beak treatments (IRBT) on the productivity and welfare of Lohmann LSL-Lite and Lohmann Brown pullets and hens. Birds were treated on day of hatch and IRBT equipment settings were adjusted to create 4 specific beaks shapes: shovel (SHV), step (STP), standard (STAN), and an untreated sham control (C). Experiment 1 pullets were housed in cages from 1 to 29 d of age. Data collected included body weight (BW), feed intake (FI), feed efficiency (FE), water disappearance (WD), pecking force (PF), beak length, age of beak sloughing, behavioural expression, and mortality. Experiment 2 pullets were housed in floor pens from 1 d to 18 wk of age. Data collected included BW, behavioural expression, and mortality. At 18 wk, pullets were transferred to layer barn. Experiment 2 hens were housed in cages until 60 wk of age. Data collected included BW, FI, egg production (EP) and quality (EQ), behavioural expression, feather cover, comb damage, and mortality. During early life, IRBT treatments did not negatively affect FI, FE, or BW. STP and STAN pullets had lower WD than C pullets when given access to water via nipple drinkers but this did not result in reduced growth. The IRBT treatments did not affect PF, suggesting that pullets were not in pain. During the first 5 wk of the rearing period, STAN pullets were more active but performed less exploratory pecking than C pullets. There was no effect of IRBT treatments on mortality during early life. Throughout the laying period, there was no effect of IRBT treatments on production. At 23 wk of age, SHV and STP hens preened more in comparison to C hens; no effect of IRBT treatments on behaviour was seen after this time. The IRBT treatments reduced feather loss, comb damage, and mortality from cannibalism. During both the rearing and laying periods, strain appeared to have more of an effect than the IRBT treatments on production and behaviour. In conclusion, the IRBT treatments and subsequent beak shapes had minor effects on the productivity and behaviour of the pullets and hens while simultaneously improving welfare by improving feather cover and reducing mortality. iii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Karen Schwean-Lardner, for her knowledge, support, encouragement, and advice throughout the process of conducting my research and writing my thesis. Thank you for accepting me as your student and helping me discover a love for research, teaching, and most surprising, poultry. Thank you to my committee members, Dr. Hank Classen and Dr. Susantha Gomis, for their valuable time, support, and input over the past two years. Thank you to my graduate committee chairs, Dr. Tim Mutsvangwa for taking the time to attend my committee meetings and Dr. Ryan Brook, who chaired my defense. Thank you to Dr. Valerie Carney for serving as my external examiner and providing input towards my thesis. I would like to thank the University of Saskatchewan Poultry Centre manager and staff for their assistance with my research. Jocelyn Fournier, Robert Gonda, Mark Meier, and Jason Marshall, thank you for feeding and caring for my pullets and hens and for helping during the many (and sometimes early) data collections. Thank you to my fellow graduate students for their help with data collections, statistics questions, and much more over the course of my Master’s program. I would like to acknowledge the funding agencies that made this research possible, the Canadian Poultry Research Council, the Saskatchewan Egg Producers, and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. I would also like to thank Clark’s Poultry Inc. in Brandon, MB for allowing us the use of their facilities. Finally, I must thank my family and friends. Thank you for being interested in my research, for asking questions, for your continuous encouragement, and for helping me remember the value of hard work. iv Table of Contents Permission to Use ............................................................................................................................ i Disclaimer ....................................................................................................................................... ii Overall Abstract ............................................................................................................................. iii Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... viii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ xi List of Abbreviations .................................................................................................................... xii 1.0 Chapter 1. Literature review: the effects of infrared beak treatment on the production, behaviour, and welfare of layer pullets and hens ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Welfare ............................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.1 Methodologies for assessing welfare ........................................................................ 6 1.2.1.1 Behaviour .............................................................................................................. 6 1.2.1.2 Pecking force ......................................................................................................... 9 1.2.1.3 Feather and comb scoring ..................................................................................... 9 1.3 Anatomy and innervation of the chicken beak ............................................................... 10 1.3.1 Beak anatomy.......................................................................................................... 10 1.3.2 Sensory receptors in the beak ................................................................................. 11 1.3.3 Effects of beak treatment ........................................................................................ 11 1.4 Pain and its relationship to beak treatment..................................................................... 12 1.4.1 Response to pain ..................................................................................................... 13 1.5 Infrared beak treatment .................................................................................................. 15 1.5.1 Severity of treatment ............................................................................................... 16 1.5.2 Pain and healing ...................................................................................................... 17 1.5.3 Beak growth ............................................................................................................ 18 1.6 Brown vs. white strains .................................................................................................