DOCSLIB.ORG

Community-Outcomes-Report-09.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Community-Outcomes-Report-09.Pdf Hawke’s Bay Community Outcomes Regional Monitoring Report May 2009 Report prepared by Sean Bevin, Economic Analyst Economic Solutions Ltd, Napier Email: [email protected] Table of Contents R e g i o n a l M o n i t o r i n g R e p o r t S u m m a r y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 n t r o d u c t i o n _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 1 . 0 I 2 . 0 a w k e ' s B a y C o m m u n i t y O u t c o m e s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 H 3 3 . 0 M e a s u r i n g O u t c o m e s P r o g r e s s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4 3 . 0 M e t h o d o l o g y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 c o n o m i c W e l l - b e i n g _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 . 0 E ( i ) E c o n o m y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 a p h i c ( a ) D e m o g r _____________________________________________________________________ 4 ( b ) i n b B u s e s s N u m e r s _________________________________________________________________ 5 ( c ) c n i c P a n c E o o m e r f o r m e _____________________________________________________________ 6 ( d ) a n d a d i v i n S t r o f L g _________________________________________________________________ 6 ( ) a l c e R u r S e t o r ______________________________________________________________________ 7 ( ) h n d i f O t e r I u s t r e s __________________________________________________________________ 8 ( ) i g T o u r s m _________________________________________________________________________ 8 ( h ) p l n E m o y m e t _____________________________________________________________________ 9 ( i ) i d n i a l a n d P b l i c n v n e s e t u I e s t m e t R __________________________________________________ 10 ( j ) d c a i n a n d a i n i n E u t o T r g ____________________________________________________________ 12 ( k ) k i l l d a b S e L o u r ___________________________________________________________________ 15 ( l ) a b a n i n L o u r E r g s __________________________________________________________________ 16 ( ) a n i n m S t f f R e t e t o __________________________________________________________________ 17 ( n ) i n P i n n i i a i v B u s e s s r o m o t o I t t e s _____________________________________________________ 18 ( ) a l i i o Q u t y o f L f e ___________________________________________________________________ 18 ( i i ) i T r a n s p o r t I n f r a s t r u c t u r e a n d S e r v c e s _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 8 ( a ) a i c C a h T r f f r s e s ___________________________________________________________________ 18 l n a b l l ( b ) V u e r e U s e r R e s u t s ___________________________________________________________ 19 ( c ) a n p a T r s o r t S f e t y _________________________________________________________________ 19 ( d ) P b l i c a n p u T r s o r t _________________________________________________________________ 20 ( ) c i v n c a l a d i n k E f f e t e e s s o f L o R o g N e t w o r s e _____________________________________________ 22 ( ) a n p a n d i n a l v l p n C n i b i n f r s o r t R e g o D e e o m e t o t r u t o T ____________________________________ 23 ( i i i ) S u m m a r y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 4 6 2 6 . 0 C u l t u r a l a n d S o c i a l W e l l - b e i n g _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( i ) i H e r t a g e _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 6 ( a ) i a P c i n a n d v l p n e r t g e r o t e t o D e e o m e t H _______________________________________________ 26 ( b ) a i i a P c i n a n d v l p n M r H e r t g e r o t e t o D e e o m e t o _________________________________________ 28 ( c ) C n i p p c i a i n a i C l a n d a n a m m u t y A r e t o o f M o r u t u r e L g u g e o _______________________________ 28 i ( i i ) L e a d e r s h p _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2 9 i n a l C l l a b a i n ( a ) R e g o o o r t o ____________________________________________________________ 29 ( b ) c n i c v l p n a n d i n a l w l l - b i n o o m D e e o m e t R e g o e e g E ______________________________________ 30 ( c ) P b l i c n v l v n i n G v n a n c I o e m e t o e r e u __________________________________________________ 31 ( i i i ) i C o m m u n t y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 2 c i - c n i c p i v a i n ( a ) S o o E o o m D e r t o _______________________________________________________ 32 ( b ) a i c i - c n i c v l p n o r S o o E o o m D e e o m e t M ________________________________________________ 33 ( c ) C n i n v l v n o m m u t y I o e m e t __________________________________________________________ 35 i ( i ) R e c r e a t o n _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 7 v ( a ) i n a l C l l a b a i n R e g o o o r t o ____________________________________________________________ 37 ( b ) n a l a k i n a c i l i i E x t e r M r e t g o f F t e s _____________________________________________________ 37 a c i l i i ( c ) U s e o f F t e s __________________________________________________________________ 37 ( d ) i d n a i a c i n i h a c i l i i e s e t S t s f t o w t F t e s R _________________________________________________ 38 ( ) n v n i n a c i l i i e I s t m e t N e w F t e s e _______________________________________________________ 39 ( ) v S u m m a r y _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 9 4 7 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration
    Local Government Leaders’ Climate Change Declaration In 2015, Mayors and Chairs of New Zealand declared an urgent need for responsive leadership and a holistic approach to climate change. We, the Mayors and Chairs of 2017, wholeheartedly support that call for action. Climate change presents significant opportunities, challenges and risks to communities throughout the world and in New Zealand. Local and regional government undertakes a wide range of activities that will be impacted by climate change and provides infrastructure and services useful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resilience. We have come together, as a group of Mayors and Chairs representing local government from across New Zealand to: 1. acknowledge the importance and urgent need to address climate change for the benefit of current and future generations; 2. give our support to the New Zealand Government for developing and implementing, in collaboration with councils, communities and businesses, an ambitious transition plan toward a low carbon and resilient New Zealand; 3. encourage Government to be more ambitious with climate change mitigation measures; 4. outline key commitments our councils will take in responding to the opportunities and risks posed by climate change; and 5. recommend important guiding principles for responding to climate change. We ask that the New Zealand Government make it a priority to develop and implement an ambitious transition plan for a low carbon and resilient New Zealand. We stress the benefits of early action to moderate the costs of adaptation to our communities. We are all too aware of challenges we face shoring up infrastructure and managing insurance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • LGNZ 3 Waters Working Group and Council Leads for Survey Completion
    LGNZ 3 Waters Project – Working Group and Council leads for survey completion Council Council - Main contact LGNZ NIF Working Council support responsible for survey Group technical person is from completion support person Far North District Martin Ross Philip Jaggard Auckland Whangarei District Simon Weston Philip Jaggard Auckland Kaipara District Bruce Thomson Philip Jaggard Auckland Waikato District Marie McIntyre Lorraine Kendrick Waipa Otorohanga District Roger Brady Lorraine Kendrick Waipa Waipa District Lorraine Kendrick Lorraine Kendrick Waipa Waitomo District Andreas Senger Lorraine Kendrick Waipa Thames Coromandel District Bruce Hinson Adrian De LaBorde Hauraki Hauraki District Rex Leonhart Adrian De LaBorde Hauraki Matamata Piako Manaia Tewiata Adrian De LaBorde Hauraki South waikato District Andrew Pascoe Adrian De LaBorde Hauraki Taupo District Mike Cordell Lorraine Kendrick Waipa Western Bay of Plenty Ian Butler/Kevin Hill Adrian De LaBorde Hauraki Rotorua District Clayton Oldham Haydn Read Wellington Kawerau District Tom McDowell Haydn Read Wellington Opotiki District Jim Findlay Haydn Read Wellington Whakatane District Tomasz Krawczyk Haydn Read Wellington Napier City Council Paul Dunford Brett Chapman Hastings Gisborne District (Unitary) Marcus Koll Brett Chapman Hastings Wairoa District Jamie Cox Brett Chapman Hastings Hastings District Brett Chapman Brett Chapman Hastings Central Hawkes Bay District Steve Thrush Brett Chapman Hastings Ruapehu District Anne-Maire Westcott Shane Allen Palmerston North Wanganui District
    [Show full text]
  • 9 April 2019
    MĀORI CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE Open Agenda Meeting Date: Tuesday 9 April 2019 Time: 3.00pm Venue: Council Chamber Hawke’s Bay Regional Council 159 Dalton Street Napier Committee Members Piri Prentice (In the Chair), Councillor Apiata Tapine, Tiwana Aranui, Te Whetū Henare-Winitana and George Reti Officer Responsible Director Community Services Administration Governance Team Next Māori Consultative Committee Meeting Tuesday 21 May 2019 1 Māori Consultative Committee - 09 April 2019 - Open Agenda ORDER OF BUSINESS Karakia Apologies Nil Conflicts of interest Public forum Announcements by the Chairperson Announcements by the management Confirmation of minutes A copy of the Minutes from the meeting held on Tuesday, 26 February 2019 are attached on page ........................................................................................................................................ 102 Reports from Standing Committees Reports from Strategy and Infrastructure Committee held 19 March 2019 1 Napier Aquatic Centre Development: Completing LTP Caveats ........................................ 3 2 Leases of Reserves - Napier Free Kindergarten Association Incorporated ..................... 12 3 Lease of Reserve - Maraenui Rugby & Sports Association Incorporated ........................ 17 4 Plastic Recycling..…………………………………………… ......................................... …..20 Reports from Finance Committee held 2 April 2019 1 Hawke's Bay Airport Ltd Half Year Report to 31 December 2018 .................................... 36 2 Elected Members' Remuneration
    [Show full text]
  • Hawke's Bay Expressway
    Hawke’s Bay Expressway: Noise and Air Quality Issues Office of the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment Te Kaitiaki Taiao a Te Whare Pāremata PO Box 10-241, Wellington June 2005 This report and other publications by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (PCE) are available on the PCE’s website: www.pce.govt.nz Author Iain McAuley, BSc, MSc (Hons), PhD With assistance from Helen Beaumont, BSc (Hons) Bob McClymont, DipTP Michael Moodie, MSc (Hons), LLB (Hons) Bruce Taylor, MPP Internal reviewer Kathryn Botherway, BSc (Hons) Editing and layout Write Group Limited, Wellington Acknowledgements The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment and his investigation team would like to thank all those who assisted with the research and preparation of this report and who provided feedback on earlier drafts. Bibliographic reference Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. 2005. Hawke’s Bay Expressway: Noise and air quality issues. Wellington: Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment. This document may be copied provided that the source is acknowledged. ISBN: 1-877274-58-5 Contents 1 About this report..................................................... 5 1.1 Introduction .....................................................5 2 The global context .................................................. 6 2.1 Adverse noise effects.........................................6 2.2 Fundamental principles for noise management ......6 2.3 Importance of social and environmental factors.....7 2.4 Measurement of noise and its impacts..................7 3 The New Zealand context........................................ 8 3.1 Noise and urban amenity values..........................8 3.2 National environmental standards .......................8 3.3 Integrated approach to transport planning............9 4 Roles and responsibilities in transport management......................................................... 10 5 The Hawke’s Bay Expressway: Background .......... 11 5.1 Designation of the expressway.........................
    [Show full text]
  • Monthy Grant Summary April 2019-Feb 2020 .Xlsx
    Organisation Name TLA Amount Requested Allocated Amount WAIKATO / BOP Kawerau District Council Kawerau District Council $50,000.00 $50,000.00 Te Whanau Waka Ama O Whangamata Thames-Coromandel District Council $36,800.00 $17,500.00 Waterwheel Historic Trust Kawerau District Council $9,599.50 $5,000.00 Rangiura Trust Board South Waikato District Council $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Matamata Country Music Club Matamata-Piako District Council $3,472.00 $3,221.00 Blue Light Ventures Inc - Edgecumbe Whakatane District Council $15,700.00 $6,531.00 Musical Theatre N Z Inc Hamilton City Council $1,860.00 $1,380.00 Literacy Taupo Inc Taupo District Council $2,083.00 $2,083.00 Brass Band Assn of N Z Inc Hamilton City Council $4,000.00 $4,000.00 Mount Maunganui Tennis Club Tauranga City Council $6,801.95 $3,000.00 Pohlen Foundation Trust Matamata-Piako District Council $10,621.00 $10,621.00 C N I K T - Central Kids Charles Kindergarten South Waikato District Council $4,332.00 $4,332.00 Sport Waikato Hamilton City Council $140,000.00 $120,000.00 Age Concern Rotorua District Inc Rotorua District Council $9,000.00 $3,000.00 Otumoetai Intermediate School Tauranga City Council $25,000.00 $20,000.00 River Downs Playcentre Hamilton City Council $6,000.00 $1,260.00 Waimana School Whakatane District Council $17,600.00 $17,600.00 Coastline District Rugby League Inc Tauranga City Council $2,836.52 $2,523.00 Tauranga Squash Rackets Club Inc Tauranga City Council $100,000.00 $70,000.00 House of Science Tauranga Charitable Trust Tauranga City Council $18,744.00 $12,000.00
    [Show full text]
  • Submission to Hamilton City Council (HCC) Regarding Water Fluoridation
    Submission No: 1064 Submission to Hamilton City Council (HCC) regarding Water Fluoridation. Greg Oosterbaan, 6 Howell Avenue, Hamilton. Ph 0273052439 Email [email protected] 31stMarch 2013 1 Submission No: 1064 Contents. 4 – 12 Personal presentation Appendix 13 What are they fluoridating with? From FANNZ website 16 NZ - Fluoridation status by council From FANNZ website 21 HYDROFLUOROSILICIC ACID AND WATER FLUORIDATION (The Process of Production) http://nzic.org.nz/ChemProcesses/production/1C.pdf 24 Material Safety Data Sheet - SODIUM FLUORIDE http://www.fannz.org.nz/pdfs/Sodium%20fluoride%20ORICA.pdf 29 Studies on Tooth Decay Rates After Water Fluoridation Is Stopped Fluoride Action Network | February 2001 31 Supplementary submission to the Inquiry into how to prevent child abuse and improve children's health outcomes Katherine Smith 38 FLUOROSIS 40 Dental Fluorosis Incidence in New Zealand 2 Submission No: 1064 44 Fluoride Is Not an Essential Nutrient Fluoride Action Network | August 2012 | By Michael Connett 46 Tooth Decay Trends in Fluoridated vs. Unfluoridated Countries F.A.N. | July 2012 | By Michael Connett 51 World Health Organisation Figures statistics on dental health of 12 year olds. 53 The Hastings Fluoridation Experiment 55 The Hastings Fluoridation Experiment: Science or Swindle? By John Colquhoun and Robert Mann (http://exacteditions.theecologist.org/exact/browse/307/308/5395/3/21) 69 Why I Changed My Mind About Water Fluoridation John Colquhoun 83 Fluoride & Intelligence: The 36 Studies Fluoride Action Network | By Michael Connett& Tara Blank, PhD | UPDATED December 9, 2012 114 (New Zealand) Institute of Directors. (IoD) https://www.iod.org.nz/ 114 http://www.parliament.nz/en- NZ/PB/Legislation/Bills/b/c/8/00DBHOH_BILL11034_1-Natural-Health- and-Supplementary-Products-Bill.htm 115 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_and_radiation_accidents Nuclear and radiation accidents From Wikipedia.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthy Grant Summary April 2019-Feb 2020 .Xlsx
    Organisation Name TLA Amount Requested Allocated Amount WAIKATO / BOP Whakatane Roller Club Inc Whakatane District Council $5,000.00 $2,750.00 Hamilton Volleyball Club Inc Hamilton City Council $12,000.00 $4,000.00 Kawaha Point School Rotorua District Council $5,950.00 $5,950.00 Manawaru Playcentre Matamata-Piako District Council $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Onemana Surf Life Saving Club Inc Thames-Coromandel District Council $100,000.00 $50,000.00 B o P Indoor Bowls Centre Inc Rotorua District Council $862.00 $862.00 Waikato Billiards & Snooker Assn Inc Hamilton City Council $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Rotorua Competitions Soc Inc Rotorua District Council $10,000.00 $8,000.00 The Circuit Club Inc Taupo District Council $10,450.00 $5,000.00 Whangamata Harbour Care Inc Thames-Coromandel District Council $5,415.00 $5,415.00 Hamilton Star University Cricket Club Inc Hamilton City Council $3,670.00 $3,670.00 Fairfield Swim Club Inc Hamilton City Council $17,500.00 $8,500.00 Whakatane Surf Life Saving Club Inc Whakatane District Council $15,559.50 $12,866.00 Create The Bay Incorporated Tauranga City Council $3,000.00 $1,500.00 C N I E E S T - Central Kids Dinsdale Hamilton City Council $10,355.00 $7,500.00 Alzheimers Soc Eastern Bay of Plenty Inc Whakatane District Council $15,456.00 $13,440.00 Volleyball Bay of Plenty Inc Tauranga City Council $1,800.00 $1,800.00 Parent to Parent N Z - Waikato Hamilton City Council $5,151.00 $2,525.00 Parent to Parent - Coastal Bay of Plenty Tauranga City Council $9,919.00 $7,843.00 Papamoa Sports Tennis Club Tauranga City
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Leaders' Climate Change Declaration
    Local Government Leaders’ Climate Change Declaration In 2015, Mayors and Chairs of New Zealand declared an urgent need for responsive leadership and a holistic approach to climate change. We, the Mayors and Chairs of 2017, wholeheartedly support that call for action. Climate change presents significant opportunities, challenges and risks to communities throughout the world and in New Zealand. Local and regional government undertakes a wide range of activities that will be impacted by climate change and provides infrastructure and services useful in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and enhancing resilience. We have come together, as a group of Mayors and Chairs representing local government from across New Zealand to: 1. acknowledge the importance and urgent need to address climate change for the benefit of current and future generations; 2. give our support to the New Zealand Government for developing and implementing, in collaboration with councils, communities and businesses, an ambitious transition plan toward a low carbon and resilient New Zealand; 3. encourage Government to be more ambitious with climate change mitigation measures; 4. outline key commitments our councils will take in responding to the opportunities and risks posed by climate change; and 5. recommend important guiding principles for responding to climate change. We ask that the New Zealand Government make it a priority to develop and implement an ambitious transition plan for a low carbon and resilient New Zealand. We stress the benefits of early action to moderate the costs of adaptation to our communities. We are all too aware of challenges we face shoring up infrastructure and managing insurance costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol in Our Lives:An Issues Paper on the Reform of New Zealand’S Liquor Laws (Nzlc Ip15, 2009)
    ALCOHOL IN OUR LIVES:AN ISSUES PAPER ON THE REFORM OF NEW ZEALAND’S LIQUOR LAWS (NZLC IP15, 2009) THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROCESS 1. The Law Commission’s consultation document, Alcohol In Our Lives: An Issues Paper On The Reform Of New Zealand’s Liquor Laws (NZLC IP15, 2009) was published in July 2009 and invited feedback from the public on the proposed options for the reform of liquor laws in New Zealand. The consultation period was open for three months from 31 July until 30 October 2009. 2. The Commission received 2939 submissions through the public consultation process. We continued accepting submissions received in the post up to mid November 2009, in order to ensure all submissions posted prior to the close off date of 30 October 2009 were received. Electronic submissions received during this period were also accepted, and processed. Submissions received subsequently were read by the Commission’s project team but could not be included in the data analysis. 3. More than two thirds of submissions were received from individuals. Alongside these were several hundred submissions from a range of organisations including, central and local government, liquor companies and related industry organisations, liquor wholesalers and retailers, academics, the medical profession, advertising groups, the Police, the treatment sector and community groups. 4. The organisations that made a submission to the Commission are listed below. A set of submissions received from these organisations is available on CD from the Commission at a cost of $10.00 (incl GST). In some cases information has been redacted from submissions in accordance with the withholding provisions of the Official Information 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Community Housing Delivery March 2018
    Napier City Council Review of Community Housing Delivery March 2018 Document status Ref Approving director Date 2315 Ewen Skinner December 2017 2315 Ewen Skinner January 2018 2315 Ewen Skinner March 2018 © Morrison Low Except for all client data and factual information contained herein, this document is the copyright of Morrison Low. All or any part of it may only be used, copied or reproduced for the purpose for which it was originally intended, except where the prior permission to do otherwise has been sought from and granted by Morrison Low. Prospective users are invited to make enquiries of Morrison Low concerning using all or part of this copyright document for purposes other than that for which it was intended. Contents Executive Summary 1 Assessment of current service 1 Delivery options 1 Consultation requirements 1 Recommendations 1 Introduction 2 Section 17A 2 Review Methodology 3 Background 3 What is social housing? 3 Current situation 3 Issues to Consider 6 Role of local government 6 Does the Council see a need for further council provision? 6 Quality and capacity of housing stock 6 Location of stock 7 Tenancy services 7 Government policy 8 Opportunity to access income related rent subsidy 8 Potential that community housing provider will partner 10 Principles 10 Options for Social Housing Delivery 11 1. Status quo 12 2. Enhanced status quo – stock optimisation 13 3. Shared services 15 4. Partnership with a community housing provider 16 Way forward 19 Consultation requirements 20 Appendix 1 Section 17A of the Local Government Act 21 Appendix 2 Summary of Options Analysis 22 Appendix 3 Information on Councils 24 Morrison Low i Executive Summary Morrison Low was commissioned to review the delivery of Community Housing by Napier City Council held within the Community Housing Portfolio, in accordance with the requirements of section 17A of the Local Government Act 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Using Fujitsu 6670 Scanner and Scandall Pro Ver 1.7 Software
    2088 1992/348 THE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT (APPROVAL OF TRANSIT NEW ZEALAND AS REQ.UIRING AUTHORITY) ORDER 1992 CA THERINE A. TIZARD, Governor-General ORDER IN COUNCIL At Wellington this 7th day of December 1992 Present: HER EXCElLENCY THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL IN COUNCIL PURSUANT to sections 167 and 420 (6) of the Resource Management Act 1991, Her Excellency the Governor-General, acting by and with the advice and consent of the Executive Council, and on the recommendation of the Minister for the Environment, hereby makes the following order_ ORDER 1. Title and commencement-(I) This order may be cited as the Resource Management (Approval of Transit New Zealand as Requiring Authority) Order 1992_ (2) This order shall come into force on the 7th day after the date of its notification in the Gazette. 2. General approval-Transit New Zealand is hereby approved as a requiring authority under section 167 of the Resource Management Act 1991 for- (a) All existing roads that are State highways as defined in section 2 (1) of the Transit New Zealand Act 1989; and (b) The maintenance and improvement of the safe and efficient operation of the existing State highways in New Zealand. 1992/348 Resource Management (Approval rif Transit New 2089 Zealand as Requiring Authority) Order 1992 s. Approval in respect of projects with existing designations­ Transit New Zealand is hereby approved as a requiring authority under section 167 of the Resource Management Act 1991 for the projects described in the Schedule to this order (being projects to which existing designations
    [Show full text]
  • Of New Zealand's Local Government
    Peter Hodder Measuring the Effectiveness of New Zealand’s Taken together, these results reveal Local Government an emphasis on assessing managerial activity, with less attention being paid to Abstract effective engagement with ratepayers. A reorientation of the programme to better Local Government New Zealand’s recently introduced CouncilMARK™ meet current expectations of central scheme assesses local councils’ effective management of finance government and ratepayers for improved and resources, their leadership and their responsiveness to their community well-being is suggested. communities, and enables them to be compared and the prospect Setting the scene for a quality enhancement for collaboration towards improved performance explored. Other regime Local governments in New Zealand own measures of reputation and ratepayer participation suggest that $119 billion in fixed assets, employ 25,000 CouncilMARK may be over-emphasising managerial capability staff and spend annually nearly $10 billion relative to stakeholder engagement, which may have implications (Productivity Commission, 2018, p.4). Seventy-eight local authorities, which vary for the scheme’s value if community well-being is introduced as a considerably in size, deliver about 10% of prominent measure of performance. total public services. A small proportion of spending is locally allocated compared to Keywords local government, quality enhancement, stakeholder most OECD countries, but many central engagement, reputation, localism government services rely strongly on local authorities for delivery. In response to its ocal Government New Zealand management, service delivery and asset reputation research (discussed later in this (LGNZ) has established a voluntary management, and stakeholder engagement. article), Local Government New Zealand Lquality enhancement programme – This article compares the results of developed a ‘Local Government Excellence CouncilMARK – for local authorities in this assessment for the participating Programme’, of which CouncilMARK is a New Zealand.
    [Show full text]