DOCSLIB.ORG

Journalof the ARTS in SOCIETY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Journalof the ARTS in SOCIETY The International JOURNALof the ARTS IN SOCIETY Volume 3, Number 5 Fountain Mediated: Marcel Duchamp’s Artwork and its Adapting Material Content Yannis Zavoleas www.arts-journal.com THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ARTS IN SOCIETY http://www.arts-journal.com First published in 2009 in Melbourne, Australia by Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd www.CommonGroundPublishing.com. © 2009 (individual papers), the author(s) © 2009 (selection and editorial matter) Common Ground Authors are responsible for the accuracy of citations, quotations, diagrams, tables and maps. All rights reserved. Apart from fair use for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act (Australia), no part of this work may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. For permissions and other inquiries, please contact <[email protected]>. ISSN: 1833-1866 Publisher Site: http://www.Arts-Journal.com THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ARTS IN SOCIETY is peer-reviewed, supported by rigorous processes of criterion-referenced article ranking and qualitative commentary, ensuring that only intellectual work of the greatest substance and highest significance is published. Typeset in Common Ground Markup Language using CGCreator multichannel typesetting system http://www.commongroundpublishing.com/software/ Fountain Mediated: Marcel Duchamp’s Artwork and its Adapting Material Content Yannis Zavoleas, University of Patras, Greece Abstract: The paper draws upon the relationship between artistic documentation and content over Marcel Duchamp’s sculpture work Fountain. The original Fountain was lost soon after it was created in 1917. Since then, Fountain has been reproduced in various media formats, such as photographs, descriptions and replicas. It may be argued that the mediated Fountains were treated as artworks of their own, meanwhile holding and aiding to increase the artistic aura of the original. Fountain is a special case for the following reasons: starting from 1917, it has triggered critical questions related to au- thenticity of artistic creation, such as whether an object of manufacture could be attributed artistic value, also whether re- productions of original artworks may be treated as artworks, too. Even so, Fountain’s artistic significance has been radically different over time. Rather surprisingly, a comparative examination of the mediated Fountains shows substantial differences in the objective information they present, to such an extent that artistic characterizations to which artwork is tied in prin- cipal, become questionable. A reverse relationship among the mediated Fountains and the original may be weaved, so that in documenting the artwork, its material content would even have to be modified in order to comply with the concurrent artistic standards. Keywords: Fountain, Marcel Duchamp, Duchamp, Stieglitz, Artistic Documentation, Authenticity, Originality, Original/Copy, Artistic Reproduction duce Fountain, as the elements composing it are “In Milan I have just made a contract with clearly distinguishable and also present in the artwork Schwarz, authorizing him to make an edition with minor or no manipulation by the artist; a remark (8 replicas) of all my few ready-mades. … But upon which Fountain’s classification as a ready- signature or no signature, your find has the made is essentially based.2 same ‘metaphysical’ value as any other ready- However, a close examination of Fountain’s doc- made, [it] even has the advantage to have no umentations raises dilemmas in regards to the ele- 1 commercial value.” ments artwork is composed of. The present inquiry (Marcel Duchamp, response to Douglas compares Fountain’s various appearances, descrip- Gorseline, July 28 1964) tions and references, in order to highlight significant differences among them. Consequently, direct pre- ARCEL DUCHAMP’S Fountain is a sumptions of artwork’s material content are debated; symbolic artwork of Modernity. The ori- moreover, a thread is weaved connecting the forma- Mginal was made in 1917 and it was lost tion of artistic beliefs to the driving forces of artistic soon after it was created; consequently, activity in general, such as artistic production and references about Fountain are applied upon its repro- promotion, also criticism, descriptions, interpreta- ductions, a fact that emphasizes even more artwork’s tions and evaluations of art. pioneering role in addressing critical issues about art, such as artistic creation, originality, authenticity, Fountain Described, Photographed, copy and mass production. It is assumed that Foun- Drawn, Sketched and Replicated tain’s material content is transferred essentially un- changed through its various documentations. Such Over time, Fountain appeared in various media a belief is further supported by the mere observation formats, including descriptions, photographs, draw- that technically it is very simple to execute and repro- ings, sketches and replicas. Firstly, Fountain was 1 Naumann, Francis M. Marcel Duchamp: The Art of Making Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Amsterdam: Ludion Press & New York: Abrams Books, 2002, p.245. 2 The ready-made is a “commonplace prefabricated object, which – with or without alteration – is isolated from its functional context and elevated to the status of art by the mere act of the artist’s selection.” Ibid., p.299. In principle, a ready-made would be intentionally contro- versial, as it deals indiscriminately with both mass-produced, industrially manufactured, objects and the unique works by individual artists made specifically to question the presumed artistic and commercial value of both. Ades, Dawn & Cox, Neil & Hopkins, David. Marcel Duchamp. London: Thames & Hudson, 1999, p.152. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ARTS IN SOCIETY, VOLUME 3, NUMBER 5, 2009 http://www.arts-journal.com, ISSN 1833-1866 © Common Ground, Yannis Zavoleas, All Rights Reserved, Permissions: [email protected] 78 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ARTS IN SOCIETY, VOLUME 3 submitted as a sculptural work in front of the Society those made in 1964, when Duchamp created eight of Independent Artists’ board of directors,3 to be replicas for the scholar/collector Arturo Schwarz, in shown at the art exhibition The Big Show in New order to be displayed along with other ready-made York, in April 1917. Duchamp submitted the work replicas of his work at the Schwarz gallery in Milan. using the pseudonym “Richard Mutt” in order to hide his involvement as Fountain’s creator, also given Artwork’s Composing Elements that he was one of the founding members of the So- ciety and among the organizers/directors of The Big Fountain’s Early Documentation in 1917 Show. Despite the democratic principals of the Soci- ety and the “no jury” policy that would not allow the In search of Fountain’s composing elements, the Show organizers to evaluate submissions, Fountain present inquiry compares artwork’s documenting was refused for display.4 The submitted work was evidence of various occasions. Starting from The lost and there is no photographic evidence of it. Big Show in 1917, the information about the submit- Thereafter, Duchamp made a series of reproductions ted work is quite ambiguous. In one source is de- for various occasions, such as art exhibitions and scribed: “a white porcelain urinal appeared on a black 5 publications. He created the first copy of Fountain pedestal in the storeroom.” Another source notes as a sculptural piece a few days later and while The that Fountain was delivered by a female friend of 6 Big Show was still open, in order to exhibit it to a Duchamp, probably Louise Norton. In another ver- private art show at the “291” gallery, in the studio sion, “this object [the urinal] was delivered to the of photographer Alfred Stieglitz in New York. That Grand Central Palace, together with an envelope piece was photographed and the “Stieglitz photo- bearing the fictitious Mr. Mutt’s six-dollar member- 7 graph” was presented in the main theme of The Blind ship and entry fee and the work’s title: “Fountain.” Man art magazine second issue of May 1917. The Wood also described “walking into one of the exhib- editors of The Blind Man were Duchamp, Beatrice ition’s storerooms and finding two members of the Wood and Henri-Pierre Roché. Blind Man’s first is- board of directors of the Society, Walter Arensberg sue of April 1917 coincided with the opening of The and George Bellows, in the midst of a furious argu- Big Show. The second edition of May was devoted ment, with the ‘glistening white object’ on the floor 8 to Fountain’s defense, presenting the Stieglitz pho- between them.” Based on related descriptions, it is tograph along with two related articles, “The Richard generally accepted that the submitted artwork was Mutt Case” and “Buddha of the Bathroom.” Copies mainly composed of a standard porcelain lavatory of the Stieglitz photograph and of The Blind Man urinal coming directly from J. L. Mott Iron Works second issue still exist. Fountain’s subsequent docu- Company, a manufacturer of plumbing equipment, mentation includes two photographs of the interior signed and dated as “R. Mutt 1917.” of Duchamp’s studio taken sometime between 1917 For some time after The Big Show it was not and 1918, showing artwork hanging from the lintel known what happened to the submitted work, as for of a doorway together with other ready-mades. Later years it was believed that it disappeared or that it on, Duchamp reproduced or supervised copies of was destroyed. Duchamp’s later interview to Pierre Fountain several times in the size of the original, as Cabanne in 1966 shortly before his death (he died well as in miniature scale. In 1938 a large number in 1968) illuminates the facts: “the Fountain was of three-dimensional miniature copies were made simply placed behind a partition and, for the duration for Duchamp’s artwork The Box in a Valise of 1941. of the exhibition, I didn’t know where it was. … Later series of copies, drawings, sketches and photo- After the exhibition, we found the Fountain again, graphs were presented, with most important ones 3 The Society of Independent Artists was a group of American and European artists founded in December 1916.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HARD FACTS and SOFT SPECULATION Thierry De Duve
    THE STORY OF FOUNTAIN: HARD FACTS AND SOFT SPECULATION Thierry de Duve ABSTRACT Thierry de Duve’s essay is anchored to the one and perhaps only hard fact that we possess regarding the story of Fountain: its photo in The Blind Man No. 2, triply captioned “Fountain by R. Mutt,” “Photograph by Alfred Stieglitz,” and “THE EXHIBIT REFUSED BY THE INDEPENDENTS,” and the editorial on the facing page, titled “The Richard Mutt Case.” He examines what kind of agency is involved in that triple “by,” and revisits Duchamp’s intentions and motivations when he created the fictitious R. Mutt, manipulated Stieglitz, and set a trap to the Independents. De Duve concludes with an invitation to art historians to abandon the “by” questions (attribution, etc.) and to focus on the “from” questions that arise when Fountain is not seen as a work of art so much as the bearer of the news that the art world has radically changed. KEYWORDS, Readymade, Fountain, Independents, Stieglitz, Sanitary pottery Then the smell of wet glue! Mentally I was not spelling art with a capital A. — Beatrice Wood1 No doubt, Marcel Duchamp’s best known and most controversial readymade is a men’s urinal tipped on its side, signed R. Mutt, dated 1917, and titled Fountain. The 2017 centennial of Fountain brought us a harvest of new books and articles on the famous or infamous urinal. I read most of them in the hope of gleaning enough newly verified facts to curtail my natural tendency to speculate. But newly verified facts are few and far between.
    [Show full text]
  • AMELIA JONES “'Women' in Dada: Elsa, Rrose, and Charlie”
    AMELIA JONES “’Women’ in Dada: Elsa, Rrose, and Charlie” From Naomi Sawelson-Gorse, Women in Dada:Essays on Sex, Gender, and Identity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998): 142-172 In his 1918 Dada manifesto, Tristan Tzara stated the sources of “Dadaist Disgust”: “Morality is an injection of chocolate into the veins of all men....I proclaim the opposition of all cosmic faculties to [sentimentality,] this gonorrhea of a putrid sun issued from the factories of philosophical thought.... Every product of disgust capable of becoming a negation of the family is Dada.”1 The dadaists were antagonistic toward what they perceived as the loss of European cultural vitality (through the “putrid sun” of sentimentality in prewar art and thought) and the hypocritical bourgeois morality and family values that had supported the nationalism culminating in World War I.2 Conversely, in Hugo Ball's words, Dada “drives toward the in- dwelling, all-connecting life nerve,” reconnecting art with the class and national conflicts informing life in the world.”3 Dada thus performed itself as radically challenging the apoliticism of European modernism as well as the debased, sentimentalized culture of the bourgeoisie through the destruction of the boundaries separating the aesthetic from life itself. But Dada has paradoxically been historicized and institutionalized as “art,” even while it has also been privileged for its attempt to explode the nineteenth-century romanticism of Charles Baudelaire's “art for art's sake.”4 Moving against the grain of most art historical accounts of Dada, which tend to focus on and fetishize the objects produced by those associated with Dada, 5 I explore here what I call the performativity of Dada: its opening up of artistic production to the vicissitudes of reception such that the process of making meaning is itself marked as a political-and, specifically, gendered-act.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alterity of the Readymade: Fountain and Displaced Artists in Wartime
    THE ENDURING IMPACT OF THE FIRST WORLD WAR A collection of perspectives Edited by Gail Romano and Kingsley Baird The Alterity of the Readymade: Fountain and Displaced Artists in Wartime Marcus Moore Massey University Abstract In April 1917, a porcelain urinal titled Fountain was submitted by Marcel Duchamp (or by his female friend, Louise Norton) under the pseudonym ‘R. MUTT’, to the Society of Independent Artists in New York. The Society’s committee refused to show it in their annual exhibition of some 2,125 works held at the Grand Central Palace. Eighty-seven years later, in 2004, Fountain was voted the most influential work of art in the 20th century by a panel of world experts. We inherit the 1917 work not because the original object survived—it was thrown out into the rubbish—but through a photographic image that Alfred Steiglitz was commissioned to take. In this photo, Marsden Hartley’s The Warriors, painted in 1913 in Berlin, also appears, enlisted as the backdrop for the piece of American hardware Duchamp selected from a plumbing showroom. To highlight the era of the Great War and its effects of displacement on individuals, this article considers each subject in turn: Marcel Duchamp’s departure from Paris and arrival in New York in 1915, and Marsden Hartley’s return to New York in 1915 after two years immersing himself in the gay subculture in pre-war Berlin. As much as describe the artists’ experiences of wartime, explain the origin of the readymade and reconstruct the events of the notorious example, Fountain, the aim of this article is to additionally bring to the fore the alterity of the other item imported ready-made in the photographic construction—the painting The Warriors.
    [Show full text]
  • November/Dec Galley 4/9/15 16:59 Page 1
    Duchamp and the Fountain:November/Dec galley 4/9/15 16:59 Page 1 THE JACKDAW WHO DID IT? NOT DUCHAMP! Duchamp and the Fountain:November/Dec galley 4/9/15 16:59 Page 2 2 A CONCEPTUAL INCONVENIENCE Former museum director Julian Spalding and academic Glyn Thompson published an important article in The Art Newspaper in November 2014 (available online at the paper’s website and also in a longer version on the Scottish Review of Books website) proposing that the object we know as Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain , the urinal, was in fact the work of someone else: dadaist artist and poet Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven. The original Fountain was famously lost. In 1999 the Tate bought a 1964 copy for $500,000: it is one of 16 replicas made between 1951 and 1964. In 2004 ‘art experts’ declared Fountain the most influential work of art of the 20th century. Spalding and Thompson have asked for Fountain to be reattributed to its true author. What follows is a correspondence between the authors and Sir Nicholas Serota, director of the Tate Gallery. An exhibition, ‘A Lady’s not a Gent’s’, about the history of Fountain will take place at Summerhall, 1 Summerhall, during the Edinburgh Festival from August 5th to October 5th. www.summerhall.co.uk Duchamp and the Fountain:November/Dec galley 4/9/15 16:59 Page 3 3 November 10th, 2014 consultation must be in the public domain. Dear Nick, We would, therefore, be grateful if you A call to reattribute Marcel Duchamp’s Fountain would supply us with a list of these specialists and a summary of the cases e write following our argument made in the November issue of they have made.
    [Show full text]
  • MARCEL DUCHAMP's Fountain
    The International JOURNALof the ARTS IN SOCIETY Volume 3, Number 5 Fountain Mediated: Marcel Duchamp’s Artwork and its Adapting Material Content Yannis Zavoleas www.arts-journal.com THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ARTS IN SOCIETY http://www.arts-journal.com First published in 2009 in Melbourne, Australia by Common Ground Publishing Pty Ltd www.CommonGroundPublishing.com. © 2009 (individual papers), the author(s) © 2009 (selection and editorial matter) Common Ground Authors are responsible for the accuracy of citations, quotations, diagrams, tables and maps. All rights reserved. Apart from fair use for the purposes of study, research, criticism or review as permitted under the Copyright Act (Australia), no part of this work may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. For permissions and other inquiries, please contact <[email protected]>. ISSN: 1833-1866 Publisher Site: http://www.Arts-Journal.com THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ARTS IN SOCIETY is peer-reviewed, supported by rigorous processes of criterion-referenced article ranking and qualitative commentary, ensuring that only intellectual work of the greatest substance and highest significance is published. Typeset in Common Ground Markup Language using CGCreator multichannel typesetting system http://www.commongroundpublishing.com/software/ Fountain Mediated: Marcel Duchamp’s Artwork and its Adapting Material Content Yannis Zavoleas, University of Patras, Greece Abstract: The paper draws upon the relationship between artistic documentation and content over Marcel Duchamp’s sculpture work Fountain. The original Fountain was lost soon after it was created in 1917. Since then, Fountain has been reproduced in various media formats, such as photographs, descriptions and replicas. It may be argued that the mediated Fountains were treated as artworks of their own, meanwhile holding and aiding to increase the artistic aura of the original.
    [Show full text]
  • Beatrice Wood: Sophisticated Primitive Helen Dixon Hennessey
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2004 Beatrice Wood: Sophisticated Primitive Helen Dixon Hennessey Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES BEATRICE WOOD: SOPHISTICATED PRIMITIVE By HELEN DIXON HENNESSEY A Dissertation submitted to the Program in the Humanities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Spring Semester, 2004 Copyright © 2004 Helen Dixon Hennessey All Rights Reserved The members of the Committee approve the dissertation of Helen D. Hennessey defended on 4 December 2003. W. T. Lhamon, Jr. Professor Directing Dissertation Nancy Smith Fichter Outside Committee Member William Cloonan Committee Member Karen L. Laughlin Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT I am grateful for the generous support of the National Endowment for the Humanities for a research year (1997-1998) and a professional development leave from Florida A&M University (Fall 2003). I am also beholding to several people who greatly assisted my completing this work: Francis M. Naumann, exacting art historian and loyal friend of Beatrice Wood; Judith Throm, head librarian of the Archives of American Art; and especially my major professor, W.T. Llamon, Jr., consistently patient and kind. Many others helped through interviews: notably Otto Heino, Beth Hapgood, Margot Wilkie, and Garth Clark. Many others unnamed are remembered. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS List of figures v Abstract vi 1. ART: OBJECT AS SUBJECT 1 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Baroness Elsa Von Freytag-Loringhoven's New York
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI Date:_May 17, 2006_______ I, _Jaime L.M. Thompson___________________________________, hereby submit this work as part of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts in: Art History It is entitled: “A Wild Apparition Liberated from constraint”: The Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven’s New York Dada Street Performances and Costume Art of 1913-1923 This work and its defense approved by: Chair: Dr. Theresa Leininger-Miller___ Dr. Joan Seeman Robinson_______ Dr. Kimberly Paice___________ _______________________________ _______________________________ “A Wild Apparition Liberated from Constraint”: The Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven’s New York Dada Street Performances and Costume Art of 1913-1923 A thesis submitted to the Art History Faculty of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning University of Cincinnati In candidacy for the degree of Master of Arts in Art History Jaime L.M. Thompson May 2006 Thesis Chair: Dr. Theresa Leininger-Miller Abstract After eighty years of obscurity the German Baroness Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven (1874-1927) has reemerged as a valuable subject of study. The Baroness was an artist and a writer whose media included poetry, collage, sculpture, performance and costume art. In chapter one I firmly establish the Baroness’s position as a Dada artist through examining her shared connections with the emergence of European Dada. In final chapters I will examine the most under-examined aspect of the Baroness’s various mediums—her performance and costume art. In the second chapter I will explore the Baroness’s work utilizing performative and feminist theories in relation to Marcel Duchamp’s female alter ego Rrose Sélavy.
    [Show full text]
  • What If Heidegger Used Fountain Instead of Van Gogh&
    What if Heidegger used Fountain instead of van Gogh’s Shoes to launch the Origin of a Work of Art?’ Heidegger’s reimagining of the artwork was instrumental in forcing a re-evaluation of modern aesthetic assumptions in the first half of the twentieth century. Heidegger’s theory of the origin of the work of art derives from a hermeneutic analysis of a single van Gogh masterpiece. On Heidegger’s view, the artwork provides a substantive and practical way of accessing the nature of art even if questions remain about all manifestations of the nature of art in general. This paper turns his analysis to an alternative influential artwork, Duchamp’s Fountain. I argue thatFountain presents difficulties for Heidegger’s method, some of which can be accommodated. However, the requirement to confine phenomenal engagement to the art object alone leads to problems when the object is appropriated from outside the artworld, not exhibited, and only one photograph bears witness to its existence. The prospect of broadening the focus of our attention from the art object alone to the “drama” of Fountain provides for a much richer phenomenal engagement. However, this move runs counter to a second stipulation of Heidegger’s approach – that the artist’s intentions and her performative acts in creating the object should be excluded from our engagement with the work. Duchamp’s radical move with readymades and Fountain, in particular, disarms more than Heidegger’s early post-modern conception of an artwork. It also places pressure on aesthetic theories that lack the capacity to reset ontological boundaries when deeper transformative experiences lie beyond the remit of the object alone, or when art-relevant concepts are appropriated into and out of the realm of art.
    [Show full text]
  • Mirrors, TRANS/Formation and Slippage in the Five-Way Portrait of Marcel Duchamp James W
    125 Mirrors, TRANS/formation and Slippage in the Five-Way Portrait of Marcel Duchamp James W. McManus California State University, Chico [Editor’s note: This article is the author’s English translation and updating of his “trucage photographique et déplacement de l’objet: À propos d’une photographie de Marcel Duchamp prise devant un miroir à charnieres (1917),” which appeared in Les Cahiers du Museé national d’art moderne in 2005.] To Lawrence D. Steefel, Jr. Duchamp is neither more or less a chess player or a painter, but a machine of atomization on all the supports, sifting the time of plans and the space of perspectives, letting the grains trickle away. - Jean-François Lyotard, Duchamp’s TRANS/formers (81-82) On May 23, 1917, at the Arensberg’s New York apartment, Francis Picabia chal- lenged Henri Pierre Roché to a game of chess, the outcome to determine the fate of their journals, 391 and Blindman, respectively. Picabia won and Blindman ceased publication (Gough-Cooper and Caumont).1 Marcel Duchamp and Roché published the score of the match in Rongwrong that July (Tomkins 198). On June 21, in the company of Beatrice Wood, Duchamp and Picabia visited the Broadway Photo Shop at 1591 Broadway, where, sitting before a hinged-mirror setup, Duchamp (Figure 1) and Picabia (Figure 2), photographed by an attendant using a photo postcard machine, had their five-way portraits made (Gough-Cooper and Caumont). 2 Sometime after sitting for the five-way portrait illustrated below (Figure 2), Picabia revisted the Broadway Photo Shop where he sat for a second five-way portrait (not illustrated).
    [Show full text]
  • Heinz Herbert Mann
    32 ist allgemein bekannt. Weil R. Mutt nicht ausgestellt ist, gibt es auch das Werk von Duchamp nicht zu sehen. In diesem Text ist die Orthographie für Du - champs angebliches Werk anders als im New York Herald. Der Plural wird ver- wendet, und “Coordinating” ist zusammengeschrieben. Der Titel läßt sich als Tulpen-Hysterie-Koordinierung übersetzen. Schon die behauptete Inspiration durch die “flower show” läßt vermuten, daß es sich um ein Bild handelt, auf dem Tulpen dargestellt sind. Jane Dixon beschreibt sogar das Gemälde in ihrem Ausstellungsüberblick: Those were the most hysterical tulips I ever saw in my life. So hysterical were they that every vestige of resemblance to their former symmetrical selves had been lost and they were merely lurid splotches of color running wild all over the canvas.58 Legende und Legenden Guillaume Apollinaire nimmt den Fall Richard Mutt als erster auf und schreibt unter der Überschrift «Le cas de Richard Mutt» im Mercure de France am 16. Juni 1918 über den Vorfall: «New York a eu une exposition des Indépendants sur le modèle de celle qui avait lieu à Paris avant la guerre. Le prix pour expo- ser était de six dollars.»59 58 Dixon 1917. Zitiert nach Naumann 1979 a [sic!], S. 39. Übersetzung: Dies waren die hysterischsten Tul pen, die ich je in meinem Leben gesehen habe. Sie waren so hyste- risch, daß jede Spur von Ähnlichkeit zu ihren vorherigen symmetrischen Identitäten ver- loren gegangen war und sie bloß noch grelle Farbkleckse waren, die wild über die ganze Lein wand liefen. Vgl. ebenda S. 37: “Long before the opening of the exhibition, repor- ters were naturally cu rious to know what Duchamp had planned to exhibit.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/23/2021 02:52:29PM Via Free Access 2 Cole
    Journal of Avant-Garde Studies (2020) 1–31 AVANT- GARDE brill.com/jags “What is 291?” Iterations of an Avant-Garde and Its Legacies Lori Cole New York University, New York, NY, USA [email protected] Abstract “What is 291?” The results of this survey, issued in 1914 by the photographer Alfred Stieglitz to artists, writers, and patrons of his gallery, known by its address at 291 Fifth Avenue, were published in his magazine Camera Work (1903–1917). However, just as Stieglitz was issuing the questionnaire, his associates—Marius de Zayas, Paul Haviland, Agnes Ernst Meyer, and Francis Picabia—were already planning a magazine called 291 (1915–1916), thereby transforming the question even as it was being asked. Read as a response to the questionnaire, the publication 291 destabilizes and amplifies the com- munity Stieglitz had established, while visually embedding its history into the pages of the new magazine. Taking 291 as a case study of the avant-garde and its legacies, this essay traces the origins of the magazine from its predecessors—that is, the periodical Camera Work and the gallery 291—to consider “What is 291?” and its afterlife. Emerg- ing from the intersection of a magazine and gallery as a new iteration of print culture, 291 worked to expand the American avant-garde and to reimagine the magazine as a medium. Keywords periodicals – questionnaires – Stieglitz – Camera Work – 291 – Picabia – Dada “What is 291?” The results of this survey, issued in 1914 by the photographer Alfred Stieglitz to artists, writers, and patrons of his gallery, known by its address at 291 Fifth Avenue, were published in his magazine Camera Work (1903–1917) (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Limbswishing Dada in New York Kentucky
    Limbswishing Dada in New York Kentucky. After Grove's desertion, she made her way to New Baroness Elsa’s Gender Performance York and promptly married the impe-cunious (but sexually satisfying) Baron Leopold von Freytag-Loringhoven. Soon a tided Irene Gammel war widow (the Baron was incarcerated by the French in 1914 and committed suicide in 1919), the Baroness claimed her new spiritual home amidst an energetic and international group of With me posing [is] art—aggressive—virile—extraordinary— invigorating— antestereotyped—no wonder blockheads by nature degeneration dislike it— vanguard artists-- many of them exiles from Europe. From 1913 feel peeved—it underscores unreceptiveness like jazz does. on, she threw herself with abandon into New York's The Baroness to Peggy Guggenheim, 1927 experimental ferment, quickly becoming the movement's most Felix Paul Greve [...] hat intellektuellen Ehrgeiz—Aber er will radical and controversial exponent.2 'Originalitat'—von der ist er strikter Antipod. Ich bin das—was er nicht ist. Perhaps it is appropriate to begin by commenting on the So musste er mich hassen—lassen. The Baroness, "Seelisch-chemischebetrachtung"1 irony of P.P. Grove and Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven's diverging trajectories. Just as the Baroness never tired of contrasting their antithetical artistic personalities, so their shifting cultural value Celebrating her posing as virile and aggressive art in the first follows opposite trends. In examining Canada's settler epigraph, the Data artist Elsa von Freytag-Loringhoven, nee Plotz literature and Grove's vital importance for the Canadian canon (1874-1927) summed up her remarkable life and work just of literature during the 19205 and 19303, Paul I.
    [Show full text]