Neighborhoods & Community Development in Franklin County

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Neighborhoods & Community Development in Franklin County Neighborhoods & Community Development in Franklin County: Understanding Our Past & Preparing for Our Future January 2012 Jason Reece, Christy Rogers, Matt Martin, Liz Colombo & Dwight Holley, Melissa Lindsjo The Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race & Ethnicity Moritz College of Law The Ohio State University www.kirwaninstitute.org Research Commissioned by: The Community Development Collaborative of Greater Columbus The following research was commissioned and released as part of the 2012 Community Development Neighborhood Summit. Key Findings The City Expands: Growth and Urban Decentralization Like most urban areas in the United States, Franklin County has experienced a pattern of urban decentralization over the past fifty years. People, housing, jobs and infrastructure have moved outward from the city, producing population loss in most of the city’s core urban communities. Franklin County and the City of Columbus have experienced overall population growth since 1970 (a 40% increase for Franklin County and 46% increase for the City of Columbus); a substantial portion of Columbus’ growth was a result of annexation, which expanded the city’s geographical area within Franklin County. At the same time, many core neighborhoods lost population. In short, distant neighborhoods have captured much of the region’s growth.1 Over one-third of the county’s census tracts -- mostly in the suburbs -- doubled the number of housing units from 1970 to 2005/2009. However, most tracts within the I-270 loop experienced stagnant housing unit growth (or loss), and saw increases in vacant properties during this time period. From 2000 to 2005/2009, census tracts in which at least 15% of the housing units were vacant quadrupled, from 9% to 36%. Reversal of Fortune: The Recession and the Housing Crisis Hit Home Unemployment rates soared across the county as adjusted median household income declined. Franklin County households overall experienced a loss of income from 1970 to 2005/2009: 83% of all tracts lost income. The decline was gradual (in each decade census tracts across the county experienced decreases in income), yet the 2000s saw the worst decline in median household income. Housing cost, as a proportion of income paid for housing, particularly for renters, has increased throughout the County since 1970. In 1970 and 1980, most of the census tracts that had high rates of residents paying more than 35% of their income on rent were in the central city. But from 1990 to 2009, housing cost burden spread to more suburban areas. Between 2000 and 2005/2009 the poverty rate across Franklin County increased. Eighty-four percent of census tracts experienced an increase in poverty and 29% of census tracts experienced over a 100% increase in poverty. In 2009, at least a quarter of the population in 32% of census tracts were in poverty -- and one tract had a 100% poverty rate. In the 1990s, public assistance was drastically reduced across Franklin County. In many neighborhoods in Franklin County, this reversal of fortune has literally stopped revitalization in its tracks. As one respondent described: “Vacancies…have stymied past progress and we’ve had to reorient our focus on stabilizing neighborhood housing markets rather than...on…economic development, infrastructure, and preserving affordable housing.” Changing Demographics In 1970 and 1980, the Latino population was less than 2% of the overall population in nearly all census tracts (i.e. in 1970 only three tracts had more than 3% Latino populations). However, by 2000, the Latino population had increased significantly in many census tracts. By 2005/2009, 9% of all census tracts had Latino populations greater than 10%. The Latino population is a small but growing presence in Franklin County. 1 | Page In 1970, few areas had significant numbers of foreign-born residents – only 2 census tracts had a foreign-born population that made up over 10% of the population – but by 2005/2009 there were significant populations of foreign-born residents throughout Franklin County, especially in northern Franklin County. This trend began in 1990 and by 2005/2009, 27% of census tracts had a foreign born population that made up 10% of the population or greater. Overall, 40% of the county’s census tracts experienced a 300% increase or greater in foreign-born populations. Of the foreign-born populations, a significant number of residents are non-citizens. There was a substantial change in the population that does not speak English in Franklin County between 1980 and 2005/2009. In 1980, in 98% of census tracts, less than 2% of the population did not speak English. In 2005/2009, one-fourth of census tracts had more than 10% of their populations who did not speak English. The increase in the non-English speaking population was most noticeable in the 2000s, began in northwest portion of the county, and expanded to the rest of the county. Education Improves, but Segregation and Disparities Remain Franklin County and its neighborhoods have seen tremendous growth in educational attainment in the past fifty years (Figures 30 and 31). Overall, the proportion of the population that obtained a High School Degree or equivalent increased across Franklin County from 1970 to 2009. However, the rate varied: In 2009, 45.5% of census tracts had a 90% or greater high school degree achievement rate; 26.9% of tracts had more than 95% rate and 3 even had a 100% rate. On the other hand, four census tracts had less than a 50% high school graduation rate, illustrating clear achievement gaps. Similarly, the percentage of residents with a college degree increased substantially from 1970 to 2009, yet disparities remain: by 2000, most northern Franklin County census tracts had at least a 50% college degree rate, while many southern Franklin County tracts had a less than 30% college degree rate. Economic and racial residential segregation persisted throughout the decades in Franklin County, particularly for African Americans. Although less drastic in 2010 than in 1970, there remains a clear concentration of African Americans in the Near East side neighborhoods. Most census tracts in Franklin County were predominantly White in 1970. Between 1970 and 1980 some census tracts on the Near East side experienced a 65% loss or greater of the White population. Between 1980 and 2000, the White population changed very little throughout the county. However, central city neighborhoods experienced an increase in the White population between 2000 and 2005/2009 -- some experienced more than a 44% increase. Residential segregation patterns correlate with segregation into neighborhoods of varying socio- economic conditions. Vacancy rates, educational attainment and poverty rates are higher in African American and Latino neighborhoods, on average, than White and Asian neighborhoods in the Columbus region. Our “opportunity analysis” of neighborhood conditions reveals alarming disparities. While 1 in 2 Whites and 7 in 10 Asians live in areas of high opportunity, only 3 in 10 Hispanics or Latinos and less than 1 in 5 African Americans live in areas of high opportunity. Furthermore, an analysis of the county’s foreign-born population shows that while 60% or more of immigrants from North America, Asia, and Europe live in high opportunity neighborhoods, less than 25% of immigrants from Central America, Africa, and the Caribbean, a group that represents 46% of all immigrants, live in high opportunity neighborhoods. Segregation also has occurred by class, with Columbus following a national trend of more residents concentrated in very poor or very affluent neighborhoods, and a decline in the number of residents living in middle income neighborhoods. Columbus reflected a national trend of neighborhoods polarized 2 | Page into very high and very low income neighborhoods, with middle income neighborhoods declining.2 In 2005/2009, 5% of census tracts, predominantly in the suburbs, had median household incomes over $100,000, while 12% of census tracts, predominantly in the inner city, had median household incomes less than $25,000. In addition, Northern Franklin County, especially the northwest, had consistently lower rates of unemployment, while southern Franklin County had higher rates of unemployment. The central city generally had the highest rates of unemployment. From 1970 to 2009, urban tracts experienced much higher poverty rates than suburban ones. Survey of community development organizations: shared challenges, shared hope Our voluntary on-line survey illuminates the characteristics, activities and challenges of some the area’s community development organizations. In general, the survey respondents represented small, professionally staffed, well-established organizations (i.e. over 15 years of experience), focused most often on housing, employment, community organizing, and services. A very high level of partnership was reported: fully two-thirds of survey respondents indicated that they have 5 or more partnerships. Only one respondent had no active partnerships. The respondents partnered for resource sharing, service delivery, and strategy building. Respondents cited challenges posed by the larger economy, such as increased poverty, unemployment, and foreclosure/vacancy as the most significant regional challenges to neighborhoods in Central Ohio. When it came to neighborhood trends most impacting service areas, respondents most often cited foreclosure, then poverty and unemployment. Many respondents saw similar trends occurring nationally, with one respondent stating,
Recommended publications
  • SDKA Market Presentation
    Columbus Real Estate Market Review Presented and Prepared by: Samuel D. Koon, MAI Owen T. Heisey [email protected] [email protected] Patrick B. Emery [email protected] 614-461-0911 Samuel D. Koon & Associates 141 East Town Street Suite 310 Columbus, Ohio 43215 Roadmap Property Types Reviewed: Income Approach: Office Market Rent Medical Market Occupancy/Vacancy Multi Unit Residential Capitalization Rate Single Unit Residential Recent Transactions Retail Ongoing Development Industrial Other Points of Interest Questions – Anytime! The Big Picture on Capitalization Rates Gas Prices Mortgage Delinquency Rates (CMBS) 1990-2016 CMBS Delinquency Rates Since 2016 Office Markets Source: CBRE Marketview Columbus Office Vacancy and Absorption Capitalization Rates Under Construction: Two25 Commons • Daimler/Kaufman Partnership • NWC of Third and Rich Streets • $60 million • 12-stories: 6 floors of residential on top; 5 floors of office above ground floor retail • 145,000 SF of office and retail • Residential component will be a market-driven combination of condominiums and apartments • Expected completion: End of 2018 Image: Columbus Business First Grandview Yard: Planned/Completed Planned • 1.2 million square feet (Class A Commercial including office, restaurants, grocery, and hospitality) • 1,300 residential units Completed • 680,000 square feet of commercial space • 274 residential units • 126 room hotel Grandview Yard: Under Development • 187,000 square feet of commercial space • 286 apartments and 13,000 square feet of amenity space
    [Show full text]
  • Harrison Park
    Harrison Park Harrison West Society Park Committee Formed in association with the Harrison West Society and Wagenbrenner Development to plan and develop a new 4.6-Acre waterfront park. Harrison Park will run along the Olentangy River from Second Avenue on the North to Quality Place to the South. The park will be developed through a joint venture between the developer and the community, funded by Tax Increment Financing. The Harrison West Park Committee will be responsible for the development of a purpose and need statement for the direction of the TIF. The park upon completion will be dedicated to the City of Columbus for public use. Harrison West Society Park Committee Table of Contents: Park Committee Members 2003 1 Tax Increment Finance News Article 33 Parkland Dedication 2003 2 Presentation to Recreation & Parks 34 Committee Park Names 3 Presentation to Victorian Village 35, 36 City of Columbus Park Names 4 Presentation to Harrison West 37 Park Naming Criteria & Endings 5 Gowdy Field 38 Program & Direction 6 Columbus Urban Growth Letter 39, 40 Plan Evaluation by Officers 7 Harrison Park Center 41, 42 Plan Evaluation by Committee 8 Park Details 43-47 Park Naming 9 Gowdy Field Selection Committee 48 Tax Increment Finance Priorities 10 Gowdy Field News Article 49, 50 Tax Increments Finance Q & A 11, 12 Gowdy Field Request for Qualifications 51-53 Park Details 13, 14 Side by Side Park 54, 55 Gazebo Options 15, 16 Street Lighting 56 Recreation & Parks Comments 17 Avenue One Lofts conceptual proposal 57-62 Site Visit Cancelled 18 Avenue
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus, Ohio HELEN M
    CITY CLERK CGOtf-OO?? IN COUNTY fAiltJ \.\JU\Jt.:. VULUMBU5 AftD OHiO DiViStON ANNUAL REPORT—1978 CITY DEPARTMENTS INDEX Office of the Mayor 2 Department of Law 2 Department of Energy & Telecommunications 6 Department of Finance 8 Data Center 11 City Treasurer 13 Division of Purchasing 15 Income Tax Division 16 City Auditor 17 Department of Recreation & Parks 18 Municipal Court 30 Municipal Civil Service Commission 41 Charitable Solicitations Board 44 Department of Development 44 Community Service 47 Council of the City of Columbus 52 Office of the City Clerk 52 Hare Charity Trust Fund 54 Municipal Garage 57 Public Lands and Buildings 57 THE CITY BULLETIN Official Publication oi the City oi Columbus Published weekly under authority of the City Charter and direction of the City Clerk. Contains official report of proceedings of council, ordinances passed and reso­ lutions adopted; civil service notes and announcements of examinations; advertise­ ments for bids; details pertaining to official actions of all city departments. Subscriptions by mail, $10.00 a Year in advance. Second-Class Postage Paid at Columbus, Ohio HELEN M. VAN HEYDE City Clerk (614 222-7316) CITY DEPARTMENTS. COLUMBUS. OHIO 1978 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR 1978 ANNUAL REPORT 1978 was a year of many accomplishments in the City of an operating grant for the first year of the two-year program Columbus. The City continued its innovative approach to designed to put 3,400 unemployed residents to work in the solving problems common to large cities in the United area. While federal budget cuts may reduce the total amount States; continued to provide basic services to the citizens of received, we will probably receive most of the $31,000,000.
    [Show full text]
  • African Americans and the Color Line in Ohio, 1915-1930
    “Giffin fills an essential gap and takes on a crucial, yet little-studied time period in history. Perhaps more important is the depth and quality of his research combined with his important and nuanced arguments about the hardening of OHIO OHIO OHIO the color line in Ohio urban areas between 1915 and 1930. This book will find STATE STATE STATE sizeable and significant audiences for a long time to come.” —James H. Madison, Indiana University Afric “An exhaustive and fascinating study of race and community.” —Kevin J. Mumford, University of Iowa Writing in true social history tradition, William W. Giffin presents a magisterial study of African Americans focusing on times that saw the culmination of an trends that were fundamentally important in shaping the twentieth century. While many scholars have examined African Americans in the South and such Americ large cities as New York and Chicago during this time, other important urban in Ohio, 1915–1930 areas have been ignored. Ohio, with its large but very different urban cen- ters—notably, Cleveland, Columbus, and Cincinnati—provides Giffin with the wealth of statistical data and qualitative material that he uses to argue that the African Americans “color line” in Ohio hardened during this time period as the Great Migration gained force. His data shows, too, that the color line varied according to urban area—it hardened progressively as one traveled South in the state. In addition, ans and the Color Line whereas previous studies have concentrated on activism at the national level through such groups as the NAACP, Giffin shows how African American men and women in Ohio constantly negotiated the color line on a local level, and the through both resistance and accommodation on a daily and very interpersonal in Ohio, 1915–1930 level with whites, other blacks, and people of different ethnic, class, and racial backgrounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus Neighborhoods a Bicentennial Documentary Series
    Columbus Neighborhoods A Bicentennial Documentary Series The people. The places. The communities we call home. WOSU To Produce Columbus Neighborhoods Landmark Series Premieres in 2009 on To celebrate Columbus’s bicentennial, WOSU Public Media With Outstanding Local is undertaking the Support & Visibility production of Columbus As a local sponsor, you receive: Neighborhoods, a series of hour-long • On-air exposure and credit documentaries including • Web placement and link extensive online resources • Local media placement about the city’s historic • Educational outreach materials neighborhoods. • Event opportunities Columbus Neighborhoods is an ambitious, Did you know? comprehensive series of documentaries, including WOSU Public Media is the leader an innovative web component, community in producing award-winning local storytelling events, and classroom components documentaries including: that will be one of the most visible and memorable projects associated with the observance of the city’s • Many Happy Returns to Lazarus bicentennial. • Pride of the Buckeyes • Birth of the Ohio Stadium Each episode in this series will examine the • Beyond the Gridiron: The Life and historical origins of these neighborhoods and trace Times of Woody Hayes their development. Prominent historical figures will • Lustron: The House America’s Been be profiled, and the neighborhood’s architecture, Waiting For economic base, and cultural assets will be examined. • The Man Who Knew Everything • Honor Flight Columbus Neighborhoods is a production of WOSU Public Media. Making the world relevant...to you. Columbus Neighborhoods Histories Project WOSU To Produce Landmark Series Starring Columbus To celebrate Columbus’s bicentennial, WOSU Public Media is undertaking the production of Columbus Neighborhoods, a series of hour-long documentaries including extensive online resources about the city’s historic neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Microrilms International 300 N
    INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photographed, a definite method of “sectioning” the material has been followed. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand comer of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again-beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Process, Structure and Use of Urban and City Centers
    PROCESS, STRUCTURE AND USE OF URBAN AND CITY CENTERS IN COLUMBUS, OHIO A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Nicholas Bittner June 2001 PROCESS, STRUCTURE AND USE OF URBAN AND CITY CENTERS IN COLUMBUS, OHIO BY NICHOLAS BITTNER This thesis has been approved for the Department of Political Science and the College of Arts and Sciences by Julie White Associate Professor of Political Science Leslie Flemming Dean, College of Arts and Sciences 3 Table of contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………5 1. Government overlays……………………………………………….………………10 Introduction………………………………………………………………………10 Historical development of technocratic process…………………………………10 Columbus as the State Capital…………………………………………...10 The 1908 plan……………………………………………………………17 City of Columbus: 1920-1970………………………………….………..20 Contemporary place…………………………………………….………………..22 Multiple centers………………………………………………………….23 Contemporary development: the region………………………………………….28 The Southeast Area………………………………………………………31 Downtown………………………………………………………………..35 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….36 2. Business volatility……………………………………………….…………………..38 Introduction………………………………………………………………………38 Historical development of corporate process…...………………………………..39 Brice…………………………………………………………….………..41 Contemporary development: neo-traditional…………………………………….46 Easton…………………………………………………………………….46 Commoditization of place………………………………………………..50 The Southeast Area………………………………………………………52
    [Show full text]
  • Download Gateway – University District Leasing Brochure
    GATEWAY – UNIVERSITY DISTRICT Gateway: the Entertainment and Retail Hub at the “Intersection” of University and City Life Gateway – University District is located on High Street, the city’s major North/South thoroughfare. It is adjacent to the revitalization project on High Street which is currently underway, spanning from 15th and High 23 270 to the intersection of King Avenue. This promises to make the University 161 161 District one of the most dynamic mixed-used corridors in Columbus by 71 2020. The Gateway is the gathering space that brings it all together, with 315 the perfect mix of dining, outdoor events and festivals as well as local, I TY D R S I S E T R V I regional and national retailers. Anchoring the property is the non-profit I C N T U N . O R S T Gateway Film Center, which boasts the Sundance designation. T H H I G H 670 More than just a destination for students, faculty and staff, the Gateway’s JOHN GLENN COLMBUS core customers trend from Young Professionals to GenXers and Baby 70 INTERNATIONAL DOWNTOWN AIRPORT Boomers, many of whom are distinct and diverse cosmopolitan COLUMBUS 7.5 MILES 1.7 MILES consumers residing in the adjacent neighborhoods comprising the 70 densest residential population in the state. 270 The Ohio State University was established in 1870 and is one of the 71 nation’s top 20 public universities, according to U.S. News & World Report. The student body totals nearly 60,000 across 15 colleges, 33 2000 undergraduate majors, and 250 master’s, doctoral and other professional degree programs.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA BOARD of ZONING ADJUSTMENT CITY of COLUMBUS, OHIO MAY 24, 2016 the Columbus Board of Zoning Adjustment Will Hold a Public
    AGENDA BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT CITY OF COLUMBUS, OHIO MAY 24, 2016 The Columbus Board of Zoning Adjustment will hold a public hearing on the following applications on TUESDAY, MAY 24, 2016 at 6:00 P.M. in the First Floor Hearing Room of the Department of Building & Zoning Services, 757 Carolyn Avenue. The Board of Zoning Adjustment hears requests for Special Permits, Appeals and Variances to the requirements of the Columbus Zoning Code, Title 33, of the Columbus City Codes. The Board does not hear applications to amend the Official Zoning Map. SPECIAL NOTE TO THE APPLICANT: It is important that you or your representative be present at the public hearing. It is the rule of the Board to dismiss an application when a representative is not present. Further information may be obtained by visiting the City of Columbus Zoning Office website at www.columbus.gov/bzs/zoning/Board-of-Zoning-Adjustment or by calling the Department of Building and Zoning Services, Public Hearings section at 645-4522. 1. Application No.: BZA16-030 Location: 170 NORTH CHAMPION AVENUE (43230), located two sites along Champion Avenue between the first alley north of East Long Street and Hawthorne Avenue and one site at the northwest corner of Hawthorne Avenue and Winner Avenue. Area Comm./Civic: Near East Area Commission Existing Zoning: ARLD, Apartment Residential District Request: Variances(s) to Section(s): 3312.49, Minimum numbers of parking spaces required. To reduce the required number of parking spaces from 18 to 0 in the southwest block and to reduce the required parking from 110 to 98 in the north block.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus, Ohio 1812-1992
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 366 735 CE 065 546 AUTHOR Van Tine, Warren R. TITLE A History of Labor in Columbus, Ohio 1812-1992. INSTITUTION Ohio State Univ., Columbus. Center for Labor Research. REPORT NO CLR-WP-010 PUB DATE 93 NOTE 78p. PUB TYPE Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC04 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Adult Education; Employer Employee Relationship; *Labor Conditions; *Labor Demands; Labor Economics; Laborers; Labor Force; *Labor Relations; Strikes; Union Members; *Unions; Work Environment IDENTIFIERS Labor Studies; *Ohio (Columbus) ABSTRACT While the building and printing industries flourished in pre-Civil War Columbus, manufacturing languished. The manufacturing base grew and diversified from 1820 to 1850. Few unions emerged, and those that did seldom lasted long. During the Civil War business and manufacturing increased to serve the camps and prisons established in Columbus. When the war ended, Columbus's workers launched the first concerted effort to build a labor movement. In August 1869 the arrival of the first train of the Hocking Valley Railroad introduced a new chapter in the city's industrial history. By World War I, industry had migrated out of the downtown area. Workers were excluded from a major say in city affairs, confined to overcrowded and inadequately served neighborhoods, and trapped in low-paying, dirty, demanding jobs. The characteristic pattern of the labor movement until the 1930s emerged: workers unionized during prosperity and retreated with recessions. World War I stimulated the economy; peace brought a depression. But because of the city's diverse economic base, it did not feel the depression as severely as other locations; nor did it experience the prosperity of the 1920s to the same degree as other communities; hence, increasingly, the word "moderate" described all national trends as they applied to Columbus.
    [Show full text]
  • Harrison West Plan a Revision of the Harrison West Reach Section of the Columbus Riverfront Vision Plan
    Harrison West Plan A Revision of the Harrison West Reach Section of the Columbus Riverfront Vision Plan City of Columbus, Department of Development, Planning Division ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Harrison West Plan A Revision of the Harrison West Reach Section of the Columbus Riverfront Vision Plan City of Columbus WORKING COMMITTEE Michael B. Coleman, Mayor Tim Bledsoe, Harrison West Society David J. Butler, Harrison West Society Department of Development Tony Celebrezze, Harrison West Society Mark Barbash, Director Bill Clarkin, APCO-Architectural Products Company Trudy A. Bartley, Deputy Director Debby Colvin, Harrison West Society Jerry Colvin, Harrison West Society Planning Division Craig Copeland, Harrison West Society Vince Papsidero, AICP, Administrator John Fleming, Central Beverage Group Lori Baudro, AICP, Neighborhood Planning Manager Mary Funk, President, Harrison West Society David Hall, AICP, Senior Planner Veda Gilp, Veda Gilp Associates Daniel Thomas, Urban Design Manager Rob Harris, Vice-President, Harrison West Society Elsie Stiger, Graphic Designer Michael Hayes, Acock Associates Odis Jones, Columbus Urban Growth Company Columbus City Council Hal Keller, Ohio Capital Corporation for Housing Matthew D. Habash, President Rick Kobee, Harrison West Society Michael C. Mentel, President Pro-Tem Barbara Kobee, Harrison West Society Kevin L. Boyce Maureen Lorenz, Columbus Recreation and Parks Mary Jo Hudson Bob Mangia, Harrison West Society Maryellen O'Shaughnessy Tom Maxwell, Harrison West Society Charleta B. Tavares Tom McClain, Battelle
    [Show full text]
  • Columbus in 1980, 2015, and 2050
    COLUMBUS IN 1980, 2015, AND 2050 Bill LaFayette, Ph.D. Owner, Regionomics® LLC May 14, 2015 1293 S. Fourth St., Columbus, OH 43206 www.regionomicsllc.com COLUMBUS IN 1980, 2015, AND 2050 Bill LaFayette, Ph.D., owner, Regionomics® May 14, 2015 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 The Historical, Current, and Future Columbus Metropolitan Statistical Area .................................. 1 Population ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Foreign‐Born Population ................................................................................................................. 3 Income ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Poverty ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Housing Security and Homelessness ............................................................................................... 7 Education ......................................................................................................................................... 11 Neighborhoods ................................................................................................................................ 13 The Hilltop ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]